Feeling

${\displaystyle Q_{1}\rightarrow Q_{1}}$

${\displaystyle Q_{1}\rightarrow Q_{2}}$

${\displaystyle Q_{1}\rightarrow \neg E_{1}}$

${\displaystyle Q_{1}\rightarrow \neg E_{2}}$

${\displaystyle Q_{2}\rightarrow Q_{1}}$

${\displaystyle Q_{2}\rightarrow Q_{2}}$

${\displaystyle Q_{2}\rightarrow \neg E_{1}}$

${\displaystyle Q_{2}\rightarrow \neg E_{2}}$

Opinion

${\displaystyle E_{1}\rightarrow Q_{1}}$

${\displaystyle E_{1}\rightarrow Q_{2}}$

${\displaystyle E_{1}\rightarrow \neg E_{2}}$

${\displaystyle E_{2}\rightarrow Q_{1}}$

${\displaystyle E_{2}\rightarrow Q_{2}}$

${\displaystyle E_{2}\rightarrow \neg E_{1}}$

Justification

${\displaystyle Q_{1}\rightarrow E_{1}}$

${\displaystyle Q_{1}\rightarrow E_{2}}$

${\displaystyle \neg E_{1}\rightarrow E_{2}}$

${\displaystyle Q_{2}\rightarrow E_{1}}$

${\displaystyle Q_{2}\rightarrow E_{2}}$

${\displaystyle \neg E_{2}\rightarrow E_{1}}$

Revelation

${\displaystyle E_{1}\rightarrow E_{1}}$

${\displaystyle E_{1}\rightarrow E_{2}}$

${\displaystyle E_{2}\rightarrow E_{1}}$

${\displaystyle E_{2}\rightarrow E_{2}}$

Feeling

When the only elements of an "explanation" are one or more qualities intended to explain a quality,

such an explanation is not subjectable to scientific or otherwise academic scrutiny,

whether the quality is true or false.

Examples:

• "I feel sick" because "it's wet outside".
• "That person is cool" because "they look cool in those jeans".
• "It's hot" because "it's very nice".

Opinion

When the only elements of an "explanation" are one or more actions intended to explain a quality,

such an explanation is subjectable to academic scrutiny, but not scientific scrutiny,

whether the quality is true or false.

Examples:

• "I feel sick" because "I inhaled too much rain".
• "That person is cool" because "they've said nice things to me".
• "It's hot" because "our team won the game".

Justification

When the only elements of an "explanation" are one or more qualities intended to explain an action,

such an explanation is subjectable to academic and scientific scrutiny

whether the quality is true or false.

But either the explanation begs the question about the quality itself

or it is tautological fact.

Such qualities are not falsifiable given the limited context.

Examples:

• "My temperature is rising" because "I have a cold".
• "They've said nice things" because "they are nice people".
• "That person helped us win the game" because "her strategy was excellent".

Revelation

When the only elements of an "explanation" are one or more actions intended to explain an action,

such an explanation is subjectable to academic and scientific scrutiny

whether the quality is true or false.

It is possible for this form not to beg the question, in light of explanations of the causal actions,

and the only tautologies that are allowed in this form are explicit, rather than implicit.

Examples:

• "My temperature is rising" because "I have caught flames on my sweater".
• "They've said nice things" because "they learn from other people who have said nice things to them".
• "That person helped us win the game" because "she scored the only points we needed to win".