Gospel of Barnabas

Part of a series on
New Testament apocrypha
First page of the Gospel of Judas (Page 33 of Codex Tchacos)
Apostolic Fathers 1 Clement 2 Clement Epistles of Ignatius Polycarp to the Philippians Martyrdom of Polycarp Didache Barnabas Diognetus The Shepherd of Hermas
Apocryphal gospels Jewish–Christian gospels Ebionites Hebrews Nazarenes Infancy gospels James Thomas Syriac Pseudo-Matthew History of Joseph the Carpenter Gnostic gospels Judas Mary Philip Truth Secret Mark The Saviour Other gospels Thomas Marcion Nicodemus Peter Barnabas Lost gospels Bartholomew Matthias Cerinthus Basilides Mani Gospel of the Hebrews
Apocalypses Paul Peter Pseudo-Methodius Thomas Stephen 1 James 2 James 2 John
Epistles Apocryphon of James Apocryphon of John Epistula Apostolorum Pseudo-Titus Peter to Philip Paul and Seneca Lost epistles Alexandrians Laodiceans
Acts Andrew Andrew and Bartholomew Barnabas John Mar Mari The Martyrs Paul Peter Peter and Andrew Peter and Paul Peter and the Twelve Philip Pilate Thaddeus Thomas Timothy Xanthippe, Polyxena, and Rebecca
Misc. Other apocrypha Clementine literature Diatessaron Doctrine of Addai Pilate cycle Prayer of the Apostle Paul Questions of Bartholomew Resurrection of Jesus Christ Related topics Nag Hammadi library
Christianity portal
v t e

The Gospel of Barnabas is a

The gospel survives in two manuscripts (in Italian and Spanish), both dated to the Middle Ages. It is one of three works with Barnabas' name; the others are the Epistle of Barnabas and the Acts of Barnabas, although they are not related to each other. The earliest known mention of the Gospel of Barnabas has been discovered in a 1634 manuscript by a Morisco which was found in Madrid, and the earliest published reference to it was in the 1715 book Menagiana by the French poet Bernard de la Monnoye.

The gospel's origins and author have been debated; several theories are speculative, and none has general acceptance. The Gospel of Barnabas is dated to the 13th to 15th centuries,^[2] much too late to have been written by Barnabas (fl. 1st century CE). Many of its teachings are synchronous with those in the Quran and oppose the Bible, especially the New Testament.

Contents

The Gospel of Barnabas, as long as the four canonical gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) combined, contains 222 chapters and about 75,000 words.^{[3]: 36 [4]} Its original title, appearing on the cover of the Italian manuscript, is The True Gospel of Jesus, Called Christ, a New Prophet Sent by God to the World: According to the Description of Barnabas His Apostle;^{[3]: 36 [5]: 215} The author, who claims to be the biblical Barnabas, wishes "peace and consolation to all them that dwell upon the earth." Then a critique follows of those (including Paul the Apostle) who are "deceived by Satan into preaching a 'most impious doctrine' by 'calling Jesus son of God, repudiating the circumcision [...] and permitting every unclean meat'."^[3]: 36

It appears to be a gospel harmony, focusing on the ministry and passion of Jesus.^[3]: 36 The gospel begins with combined elements of Matthew and Luke, such as the annunciation by the archangel Gabriel to Mary, the Adoration of the Magi, the massacre of the Innocents, the circumcision of Jesus, and his finding in the Temple.^[3]: 36 It then jumps to Jesus at age 30, when he goes to the Mount of Olives with his mother to gather olives; while praying there, he received the gospel from Gabriel.^[3]: 37 After this revelation, he tells his mother that he will no longer live with her. Jesus later goes to Jerusalem and begins preaching there. He appoints twelve apostles to accompany him during his ministry; the gospel mentions only ten, including Barnabas.^{[3]: 37 [6]: 34} The gospel follows teachings attributed to Jesus about the origins of circumcision, condemnation of the uncircumcised, and the life of Abraham (including his destruction of idols and the sacrifice of his son Ishmael).^{[3]: 37–38}

The gospel recounts the transfiguration of Jesus and his proclamation of the prophet, Muhammad, who will come after him.^{[3]: 38–39} After a number of his parables and teachings it describes his passion, beginning with his confrontations with the scribes and Pharisees about the woman taken in adultery.^[3]: 43 Mary is told by Gabriel about her son's forthcoming crucifixion and his protection from it;^[3]: 45 the high priest, Herod Antipas, and Pontius Pilate discuss what to do about him.^[3]: 43 Jesus and his disciples hide in Nicodemus' house, where they have the Last Supper.^[3]: 44 Judas Iscariot betrays him for thirty pieces of silver;^[3]: 44 God then commands Gabriel, Michael, Raphael, and Uriel to save Jesus by taking him "out by the window that looketh toward the South" to the third heaven.^{[3]: 44 [6]: 11}

Judas, whose face and speech are changed to resemble those of Jesus, returns to the house while the other disciples are sleeping.^[3]: 44 He is surprised to know that they think he is Jesus,^[3]: 44 and he is arrested.^[3]: 45 Pilate orders his crucifixion, and he is placed in Joseph of Arimathea's tomb.^{[3]: 45–46} Jesus prays for the ability to see his mother and disciples and tell them what actually happened.^[3]: 46 He turns to Barnabas, whom he charges with writing about what occurred.^[3]: 47 The gospel ends with the dispersion of the disciples and another criticism of Paul.^{[3]: 47–48}

Textual history

The Gospel of Barnabas is dated from the 14th^[7] to the 17th centuries,^[6]:57 too late to have been written by the biblical Barnabas (fl. 1st century CE).^[8]:3 It is one of three extant works bearing his name, along with the Epistle of Barnabas and the Acts of Barnabas.^[8]:53–60 A "Gospel according to Barnabas" was first mentioned in the sixth-century Gelasian Decree, and was condemned as apocryphal.^[3]: 25 Another mention of a gospel using his name is in the seventh-century List of the Sixty Books,^[9]: xxiv or the Catalogue of the Sixty Canonical Books.^[10]: 533 Historians are uncertain whether these refer to this Gospel of Barnabas, since no quotes have been preserved for confirmation.^[3]: 25 Jomier believes a forger could have taken the title after the publishing of the Gelasian Decree by printing press.^[11]

The earliest reference to the gospel may have been in a 1634 letter^[6]: 50 in the Biblioteca Nacional de España written in Tunisia by Ibrahim al-Taybil (Juan Pérez in Spanish), an Arabic-Spanish translator and author.^[4] He referred to the "Gospel of Saint Barnabas, where one can find the light".^[a][4] The first published reference to the gospel was by the French poet Bernard de la Monnoye in his 1715 book, Menagiana.^[3]: 26 Dutch orientalist Adriaan Reland referred to the gospel's Spanish version in his 1717 De religione Mohamedica (On the Mohammedan Religion).^[12]: 17 The following year, a reference to the Italian version appeared in the Irish philosopher John Toland's Nazarenus.^[7] British Orientalist George Sale cited the Italian and Spanish manuscripts in his 1734 The Preliminary Discourse to the Koran.^[13]: 53

Manuscripts

Italian

In Nazarenus, Toland said that he was shown the manuscript he called the "Mahometan Gospel" in 1709 in

Jesus being gone, the Disciples scattered themselves into many parts of Palestine, and of the rest of the world; and the truth, being hated of Satan, was persecuted by falshood, as it ever happens. For certain wicked men, under pretence of being Disciples, preached that Jesus was dead, and not risen again: others preached that Jesus was truly dead, and risen again: others preached, and still continued to preach, that Jesus is the Son of God, among which persons Paul has been deceived. We therefore, according to the measure of our knowledge, do preach to those who fear God, to the end that they may be saved at the last day of divine judgment; Amen. The end of the Gospel.[15]

Dated to the end of the sixteenth century,^[16] the manuscript was anonymous.^[15] Toland observed that it was written on a "Turkish paper delicately gummed and polished", bound in the "Turkish manner", and the fine quality of its ink and orthography^{[citation needed]} led him to assume that it was at least three hundred years old. In the appendix of his book, Toland wrote: "[I]t was an octavo volume six inches long, four broad, and one-and-a-half thick, and containing 229 leaves, each of about eighteen and nineteen lines."^[15] The manuscript was obtained by Prince Eugene of Savoy in 1738 through Cramer, who wrote in a dedicatory preface that no Christian had ever been allowed to see it "although they strove with all means at their disposal to find it and take a look at it".^[3]: 50 It is currently held by the Austrian National Library.^[7][4]

The scholars Lonsdale and Laura Ragg published an English translation of the Italian manuscript by Oxford University Press in 1907.^[4] An Arabic translation, at the initiative of the Egyptian scholar Rashid Rida, was published the following year^[4] and became popular in the Muslim world; Saʿādeh, a Christian, translated it.^[5]: 214 Rida began publishing promotional excerpts and information about the Arabic translation before its publication in July 1907 in his magazine, Al-Manār.^[5]: 218 The Raggs' English translation (without their critical preface) became popular in 1973 in Pakistan,^[17]: 80 when it was published by M. A. Rahim and promoted as the "true gospel of Jesus"^[18] by local newspapers.^[4] In Indonesia, it was translated in 1969, 1970, and 1980;^[19]: 129 the 1970 translation, by Husein bin Abu Bakar Al-Habsyi [id] and Abubakar Basymeleh, was republished with additional footnotes in 1987.^{[20]: 91 [21]} Translations in Dutch (1990), German (1994), modern Italian, Persian (1927), Spanish, Turkish, and Urdu (1916) have also been published.^[4][22]

Spanish

The Spanish manuscript was lost for more than a century;^[3]: 25 Sale became the only source for a detailed description in his 1734 book, The Koran.^[23]: xi He wrote, "The book is a moderate quarto [...] written in a very legible hand, but a little damaged towards the latter end. It contains two hundred and twenty-two chapters of unequal length, and four hundred and twenty pages."^[23]: xi Sale saw the manuscript while it was still in the possession of rector George Holme.^[24] It later passed to Thomas Monkhouse, a fellow of The Queen's College, Oxford, and was seen by the Reverend Joseph White. White quoted several extracts from the English translation in a 1784 lecture, before the gospel's whereabouts became unknown.^[3]: 25

A Spanish Gospel of Barnabas was found at the

Scholars note parallels in the manuscript to a series of Morisco forgeries (collectively known as the Lead Books of Sacromonte),^{[25]: 289 [4]} which may date it to the 16th century.^[7] Claiming to be a translation of an Italian manuscript – probably not the extant one – it opens with a prologue by Fra Marino (likely a pseudonym).^[3]: 51 According to Fra Marino, he first encountered writings by the Church Father Irenaeus which criticized Paul and referred to the Gospel of Barnabas. While with his friend Pope Sixtus V at a Vatican City library, he then found a copy of the Gospel of Barnabas and converted to Islam after reading it.^{[3]: 9 [18]} Mustafa de Aranda, an Aragonese Muslim who lived in Istanbul (then Constantinople), is identified in the translator's note as the translator of the Italian manuscript into Spanish.^[7] Nothing further is known about this,^[4] and none of Irenaeus' writings mentioned the gospel.^[26] Through the University of Granada, Luis Bernabé Pons published the incomplete Spanish manuscript (with missing parts derived from the Italian manuscript) in a 1998 book entitled El texto morisco del Evangelio de San Bernabé (The Moorish Text of the Gospel of Saint Barnabas).^[7]

Syriac

In 1985, Turkish media reported that an alleged Syriac-language copy of the Gospel of Barnabas had been found in the city of Hakkâri. ^[27] In February 2012, the Turkish press reported that the Ministry of Culture and Tourism confirmed that a 52-page biblical manuscript thought to be the Gospel of Barnabas had been deposited at the Ethnography Museum of Ankara.^[28] The manuscript was reportedly found in Cyprus in 2000 in a police anti-smuggling operation, and had been in a police repository since then.^[29] Photographs of a cover page were widely published, on which can be read an inscription in a neo-Aramaic hand: "In the name of our Lord, this book is written on the hands of the monks of the high monastery in Nineveh, in the 1,500th year of our Lord."^[30]

Authorship and origins

The Gospel of Barnabas is probably of

The gospel has been hypothesized as having Spanish origins or connections.[6]^{: 52–53 [4]} Spanish academic Mikel de Epalza suggested that the Italian manuscript was created by a Spaniard, with elements of Tuscan and Venetian dialects. Epalza said that the author may have been a Spanish student at the University of Bologna (where the dialects were spoken), since Spaniards commonly studied there during the Middle Ages.^{[3]: 63–64} Analysis indicates linguistic errors in the manuscript, demonstrating the author's unfamiliarity with Italian.^{[3]: 64, 144 [c]} Author David Fox wrote about Arabic gospel forgeries written in 1588 by two Moriscos in Granada, theorizing that the Gospel of Barnabas may have been another Morisco forgery.^{[3]: 64 [4]}

This theory also leads other researchers to advocate a Spanish priority; they believe that the preface in the Spanish manuscript was a fabrication,^[31] a "mere literary device".^[32] According to Luis Bernabé Pons, the Lead Books of Sacromonte (found in Granada in 1595) were meant to begin the Gospel of Barnabas.^[4] The books, written on round lead leaves, deal with the arrival of James the Great and his disciples in Spain.^[4] The books say that James was tasked to hide them in Spain, where a priest (helped by Arabs) would discover them.^[4] The "great conqueror king of the Arab kings" – probably referring to the Ottoman Empire – later summoned a council in Cyprus, the traditional site of Barnabas' martyrdom.^[4] Pons said that Barnabas' name was used because the Lead Books were "suspected and scrutinized" for Islamic content, including the Shahada.^[4] The plan failed when the Moriscos were expelled between 1609 and 1614.^[4]

A comparison of the Italian and Spanish texts indicates several places where the Spanish reading appears secondary; words or phrases necessary for meaning are missing from the Spanish text, but appear in the Italian.^[33]: 155 Biblical scholar Jan Joosten hypothesized a lost Italian original, which he dated to the mid-14th century and may have been used by both manuscripts. Joosten noted that the Spanish text adapts a number of "Italianisms". The Italian text uses the conjunction pero ("therefore"), and the Spanish text reads pero ("however"); the Italian word is the one required in the context. Only the Spanish reading makes sense in several passages, however, and many features of the Italian text are not found in the Spanish.^[7]

Jan Slomp wrote in

The Gospel of Barnabas contains historic anachronisms, as well as geographical and other factual errors.^{[4][6]: 27, 43} According to the Raggs, they prove its medieval origins^[23]: 433 and the author's ignorance of first-century Judea.^[6]: 24 Anachronisms include:^{[3]: 38–39 [6]: 19, 21–29}

• In chapter three, Pontius Pilate is said to have governed Judea and Annas and Caiaphas were the high priests when Jesus was born (c. 4 BC). Annas became high priest in AD 6, and his son-in-law Caiaphas succeeded him in AD 18. Pilate did not become procurator until AD 26–27.
• In chapter 15, during the first year of Jesus' ministry, it is said that the "
  feast of Tabernacles
  was near". In chapter 30, the author writes of the Senofegia which would also take place that year; Tabernacles and Senofegia are synonymous.
• In chapters 20–21, it is said that Jesus and his disciples arrived in Nazareth after embarking on the Sea of Galilee and "went up to Capernaum"; Capernaum was on the shore, and Nazareth more than 15 miles inland.
• In chapters 42 and 96, Jesus said: "I am not the Messiah". The authors appear to not realise that the Greek Christ and the Hebrew Messiah are synonymous; both mean "the anointed one".
• In chapter 63, Nineveh is described as near the Mediterranean Sea; it was 400 miles (640 km) away, in Mesopotamia (modern Iraq).
• In chapter 65, Jesus is said to go to the "Probatica" pool. According to the author, it is so called "because the angel of God every day troubled the water, and whosoever first entered the water after its movement was cured of every kind of infirmity"; probatikḗ, Greek for the Aramaic bethesda, means "of the sheep".
• In chapter 82, it is said that a
  jubilee occurs every hundred years; the Jewish jubilee is every fifty years. Pope Boniface VIII proclaimed 1300 as the first Christian jubilee
  , and the next jubilee would take place a hundred years later.
• In chapter 99, Tyre is said to be near the Jordan River; in reality, it is more than 30 miles (48 km) away.
• In chapter 144, the word
  Pharisee is said to mean "seeking God"; derived from the Hebrew, it means "separated". In the next chapter, it is said that the Pharisees
  began when the Canaanites had power in Judea; this would have been in the 11th century BC or earlier; the Pharisees, a Jewish religious movement, began no earlier than the second century BC.
• In chapter 152, it is said that wine barrels were in use during Jesus' time; large jars (
  pithoi
  ) were used then to store wine.
• In chapters 214 and 217, the "pagan" Herod Antipas is said to rule Jerusalem and Judea; his authority was in Galilee, and he followed the Jewish religion.

Scholarly analysis indicates that the Gospel of Barnabas had an anti-Pauline tone, most clearly shown in its prologue and epilogue; these depict Paul preaching a perverted version of Jesus' teachings, and as "deceived" in thinking that Jesus was God (or the Son of God).^{[3]: 12, 20–21 [34]} In his Connecting with Muslims: A Guide to Communicating Effectively (2014), Lebanese author and Christian missionary Fouad Masri called the gospel anachronistic; in the Acts of the Apostles, Barnabas was Paul's best friend and not an enemy.^{[35]: 165–166} For the Journal of Higher Criticism, R. Blackhirst wrote that the Epistle to the Galatians account of conflict between Paul and Barnabas may have been why the gospel's author attributed it to Barnabas.^[34]

Parallels with the Quran

Crucifixion of Jesus

In the Gospel of Barnabas, Jesus was not crucified. Judas Iscariot (whose face was made to resemble his) replaced him on the cross, and Jesus was raised into heaven by God.^{[6]: 2 [23]: xxvii} This agrees with the mainstream interpretations of An-Nisa 157–158, affirming that Jesus was not crucified but instead his lookalike was:

and for boasting, “We killed the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, the messenger of Allah.” But they neither killed nor crucified him—it was only made to appear so. Even those who argue for this ˹crucifixion˺ are in doubt. They have no knowledge whatsoever—only making assumptions. They certainly did not kill him. Rather, Allah raised him up to Himself. And Allah is Almighty, All-Wise.^[36]

— Qur'ān 4:157-158

In its narrative of Jesus' crucifixion, the gospel is thought to be influenced by (or adopt) docetism: a heterodox doctrine that Jesus' human form was an illusion.^{[3]: 98 [23]: xlvii} David Sox wrote that the Gospel of Barnabas' portrayal of Judas Iscariot is more sympathetic than that in the canonical gospels, where he is cast as a villainous betrayer; in Christian tradition, his name is synonymous with one who deceives under the guise of friendship.^{[3]: 94–95} The Raggs said that since the alleged substitution in the Quran is unnamed and unexplained, the author of the gospel attempted to fill this void.^{[23]: xxvii}

Ghulam Murtaza Azad described the gospel as a medieval forgery in Islamic Studies, but found its narrative more reasonable than that of the canonical gospels: "A man who is not religious minded can hardly believe that a person who wrought such great miracles could not save himself from humiliation and cross. The Christians say that he was crucified in order to save mankind from their sins. This explanation of crucifixion is strange and difficult to understand. And stranger than that is that the traitor was saved and the master was hanged."^[37] In his Understand My Muslim People (2004), Abraham Sarker wrote that the narrative is popular in Quranic exegesis.^{[38]: 129–130}

Prediction of Muhammad

In accordance with As-Saff 6, Muslims believe that Jesus was the forerunner of Muhammad and predicted Muhammad's coming:

And ˹remember˺ when Jesus, son of Mary, said, “O children of Israel! I am truly Allah’s messenger to you, confirming the Torah which came before me, and giving good news of a messenger after me whose name will be Aḥmad.” Yet when the Prophet came to them with clear proofs, they said, “This is pure magic.”
—Qur'ān 61:6 ^[39]

In Islam, the word ahmad (Arabic for "the praised one") refers to Muhammad.^{[4][40]: 157} The Gospel of Barnabas contains a number of sayings attributed to Jesus, who Muslims believe predicted the coming of Muhammad.^[6]: 2 The gospel places Jesus in the role played by John the Baptist in the canonical gospels;^[17]: 90 this appears to contradict the Quran, however, which says that Jesus was the promised messiah.^[4]

Nontrinitarianism

According to the Nicene Creed, the concept of the Trinity means that God is one and also exists consubstantially as three persons (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit); Jesus is the Son.^[41] Trinitarianism is rejected by Islam, which believes in the concept of tawhid (indivisible oneness) and considers the Trinity a shirk equating God with his creation.^{[40]: 46, 135–136} Muslims believe that, like other Islamic prophets, Jesus was human and never claimed to be God.^[40]: 223 The Gospel of Barnabas contains statements, attributed to Jesus, in which he denies being the Son of God.^[6]: 7 The gospel says that Jesus appeared to be crucified as punishment for people who claimed his divinity, and Muhammad was sent later to expose the transgressions by the Christians for worshipping Jesus.^[42]

Perspectives

Christian

The Gospel of Barnabas was not accepted by Christians,^[27] who consider it inferior to the four canonical gospels and a forgery.^{[4][40]: 307} According to Togardo Siburian of the Bandung Theological Seminary [id], it is often used "by [Muslim] propagandists in a guerrilla manner to prey on Christians with weak theological commitments. This is what is said to be the efficacy of the book, as new material for the stealth 'Islamization' of Christian churches today."^[43] Jan Joosten called it a "hotchpotch of Christian, Jewish, and Muslim materials".^[7] J. N. J. Kritzinger wrote for Religion in Southern Africa that the gospel is an obstacle to Christian–Muslim interfaith dialogue, and neither side should use it to discredit the other's religion.^[44] Christian theologian Norman Geisler criticised Muslims who use it to validate their arguments:

It is not surprising that Muslim apologists appeal to the Gospel of Barnabas in that it supports a central Islamic teaching in contrast to the New Testament. It claims that Jesus did not die on the cross [...] Rather, it argues that Judas Iscariot died in Jesus' stead [...] having been substituted for him at the last minute. This view has been adopted by many Muslims, since the vast majority of them believe that someone else was substituted on the cross for Jesus.^[40]: 296

Jan Slomp wrote that it was difficult to understand the absence of mentions of the gospel in early Islamic writings if it had existed since antiquity,^[3]: 19 a view shared by A. H. Mathias Zahniser in his The Mission and Death of Jesus in Islam and Christianity (2017).^{[17]: 93–94} Slomp called it a "conscious attempt at imitating a Diatessaron".^[3]:35 Egyptian Catholic philosopher Georges Chehata Anawati [arz] wrote for the 1971 Encyclopaedia of Islam, "The appearance of a forgery entitled the Gospel of Barnabas put into the hands of the Muslim polemicists [...] a new weapon whose effects on the ordinary public, and even on some insufficiently informed members of universities are felt even today."^[3]: 32 A critical book, William F. Campbell's The Gospel of Barnabas: Its True Value, was published in 1989.^[6]

Islamic

Acceptance

Some have identified it as the Injil, one of four Islamic holy books sent by God.^[45][e] About the gospel's generally-positive reception in the Muslim world, Scottish orientalist W. Montgomery Watt said that it is not uncommon for Muslims to be persuaded to believe in it without question; some are unaware of the scholarly consensus that it is a forgery.^{[46]: 117–118} According to German scholar Christine Schirrmacher, Muslim positivity about the gospel is based on its claim of being written by an eyewitness and disagreement (favoured by Islam) with mainstream Christian doctrines.^[27]

Among Muslims, the gospel was first cited by Pakistani scholar Rahmatullah Kairanawi in his Ijaz-i Isawi (1853).^[22] It became more popular after the 1908 publication of Rashid Rida's Arabic translation.^[5]: 214 According to Pakistani scholar Abul A'la Maududi, the Gospel of Barnabas is "more genuine than the four canonical gospels".^[4] Rida agreed that it was "superior" to the canonical gospels in its "divine knowledge, glorification of the Creator, and knowledge of ethics, manners and values".^[5]: 235 During a 1940 course at Al-Azhar University, Egyptian intellectual Muhammad Abu Zahra challenged Christians to study and refute the gospel: "The most significant service to the religions and to humanity would be that the church take the trouble to study the gospel according to Barnabas and refute it and to bring us the proofs on which this refutation is based."^[6]: 2

At a 1976 Christian–Muslim dialogue in Libya, each Muslim delegate first received copies of the Gospel of Barnabas and the Quran; the gospel was withdrawn after a protest by the Vatican.^{[3]: 11 [47]: 100} Rahim published Jesus: A Prophet of Islam, defending the gospel, in 1979.^[3]: 12 M. A. Yusseff wrote in The Dead Sea Scrolls, The Gospel of Barnabas, and the New Testament (1985) that no other gospels can equal its authenticity.^[40]: 295 A 2007 Iranian film, The Messiah, was apparently based on the gospel and was the first film to depict Jesus from Christian and Islamic perspectives.^[48] It had a mixed critical response, praised for "generating interfaith dialogue"^[48] but criticised for its controversial account of the crucifixion.^[49] Director Nader Talebzadeh said, "I pray for Christians. They've been misled. They will realize one day the true story."^[50]

Rejection

The Gospel of Barnabas is criticized by Muslim scholars,^[40]: 298 who reject it partially^[47]: 101 or completely.^[51] According to American scholar Amina Inloes, the many differences between the gospel and the Quran dilute its importance.^[18] In the January 1977 issue of the Islamic World League journal, Syrian writer Yahya al-Hashimi called it a polemic by a Jew to generate hostility between Christians and Muslims.^{[3]: 115 [4]} Al-Hashimi said that there was no need to use apocryphal gospels to prove that Muhammad was a prophet, because he believed Muhammad had been foretold by Jesus as the Paraclete in the Gospel of John.^[4] Egyptian literary critic Abbas Mahmoud al-Aqqad cited several reasons to reject the gospel, including the use of Andalusi Arabic phrases and teachings which conflict with the Quran.^{[6]: 34 [4]}

See also

• Toledot Yeshu
• Acts of Barnabas
• Epistle of Barnabas

Footnotes

References

Wikisource has original text related to this article:

Gospel of Barnabas