Talk:World War II

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of December 18, 2005.
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article
WikiProject iconAustralia Top‑importance
WikiProject iconWorld War II is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
Note icon
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to help@wikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
WikiProject iconAustria High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBosnia and Herzegovina High‑importance
WikiProject iconWorld War II is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBrazil: History Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the History of Brazil task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconBulgaria High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCanada: History / Military High‑importance
WikiProject icon
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject History of Canada.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the joint Canadian military and military history task force
WikiProject iconChina High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCroatia High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCzech Republic High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconFrance Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconGermany Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconGreece High‑importance
WikiProject icon
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconHungary High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconItaly High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconIndia High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconJapan: History / Military history High‑importance
WikiProject icon
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the History task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force.
WikiProject Japan to do list:
  • Featured content candidates – 

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

WikiProject iconLithuania Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMoldova Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Moldova, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Moldova on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconNetherlands
WikiProject iconThis article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.
WikiProject iconPoland Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconRomania Top‑importance
WikiProject icon
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconRussia: History / Military Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia.
To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.
WikiProject iconSerbia High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
inactive
.
WikiProject iconSlovakia High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovakia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Slovakia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSlovenia High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Slovenia to-do list:

Here are some tasks you can do (watch):

WikiProject iconSoviet Union Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited Kingdom High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Military history / History Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as Top-importance).
Note icon
This article has been selected for use on the United States portal.
WikiProject iconVietnam High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconZimbabwe: Rhodesia Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconWorld War II is within the scope of WikiProject Zimbabwe, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Zimbabwe and Zimbabwe-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Rhodesia task force (assessed as High-importance).
WikiProject Zimbabwe open tasks:
Tasks clipboard
Tasks clipboard
Zimbabwe-related tasks
view edit discusshistorywatch
WikiProject iconInternational relations High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconNepal Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.


I think the lead sentence needs to be modified

Taking a look in World War I, we can clearly, no doubt, see that the introduction sentence does not conform the consistency as belongs to World War II, where World War I put the start and the end in full date format, and enclosed in brackets, but World War II says otherwise. Checking these for reference:
World War I

global conflict fought between two coalitions....
But differently,
World War II[b] or the Second World War was a global conflict that lasted from 1939 to 1945. The vast majority of the world's countries,.... Do you guys have any comment about this difference between two popular pages? 2405:4802:64C7:BF70:B50C:773B:1A40:16BA (talk) 01:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

It seems OK. This article is in much better shape than the World War I article. Nick-D (talk) 02:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No problem with either, really. No reason they have to be identical.--Jack Upland (talk) 03:58, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Jack Upland, @Nick-D, while both of you may find it appropriate and no changes need to be evaluated; however, identical lead statements make the two pages about two world wars looks seamless and consistent. Just small but make a huge leap! 2405:4802:64C7:BF70:20BF:895B:4915:B58A (talk) 04:13, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not a convincing reason. Slatersteven (talk) 16:51, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese theater infobox Photo

The infobox should have a photo from the chinese theater. It was a major theater and it deserves to have recognition in the photo collage. Yedaman54 (talk) 08:22, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 February 2024

37.222.96.160 (talk) 12:58, 27 February 2024 (UTC) world war 2 was the most deadly war in history with really dangerous arms such as atomic bombs, nuclear bombs, nuclear arms and a lot more![reply]
SO what do you want us to add? Slatersteven (talk) 13:00, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a
"change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 16:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

New photo for the Sino-Japanese War

I think this photo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Japanese_Special_Naval_Landing_Forces_in_Battle_of_Shanghai_1937.jpg would be better then the somewhat blurry image that is used at the moment (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Shanghai1937IJA_ruins.jpg) Ruttoperuna (talk) 20:03, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Order of commanders and leaders

@ThunderGit: This order of commanders and leaders has been discussed many times, e.g., Talk:World War II/Archive 61#RfC: Main Allied Leaders. It cannot be changed without a discussion with other editors on this Talk page.

I appreciate your efforts to improve Wikipedia, but I suggest you focus on other issues. This issue has been discussed extensively for years. Accordingly, I feel compelled to revert your edit again. DavidMCEddy (talk) 20:45, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 March 2024

To fix grammar. 66.206.114.194 (talk) 17:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to tell us what it is. Slatersteven (talk) 17:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect The Greater War has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 18 § The Greater War until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Axis country

If you actually think Bulgaria fought on the German side so its interesting how its not on the Axis team when Bulgaria joined the 3th Reich without having to fight so,can you please add it 84.54.153.33 (talk) 19:12, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Err, where is it missing from? Slatersteven (talk) 10:42, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 April 2024

Additional Reading

  • World War II: Summary, combatants & facts, A&E Television Networks, 2024-03-13
  • Grooms, Thomas B. (2021-01-22), World War II (U.S. National Park Service). ThomasB15223 (talk) 20:54, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Question: where exactly should these go and why them and not the countless others that can easily be found? M.Bitton (talk) 21:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template. TylerBurden (talk) 18:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion About My Changes To The Article

@Slatersteven lets discuss here.


Sorry, I didn't see your edit reverting me since I was already working on my next one.


Please explain why you reverted my edits and we can go from there Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 15:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see what value your mass edit has. We do not need all that in the lede, people can read the article and know who the great powers were. Nor do we need links to words like civilian. Simply put there were too many changes that were problematic to single one to. Slatersteven (talk) 15:56, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That note was because, in order to say that all the great powers were involved, it's not unreasonable to say who we are saying was involved. And whats wrong with linking to civilian. Understanding what a civilian is is pretty important to know what the sentence means@Slatersteven Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 16:02, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We do, the info box, and the body and in wiki links in the lede. Slatersteven (talk) 16:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info box says main leaders, not great powers. should we change it. And how about my other things@Slatersteven Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 16:10, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Participants. Slatersteven (talk) 16:18, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is no place in the article saying what the Great powers of the time where, and that they were great powers. And how about everything else, if that was your only issue can I reinstate the rest of my edit@Slatersteven Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 18:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As as I said there were just too many issues (one other of which I have already mentioned). Also who said these are the great powers? Slatersteven (talk) 18:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
List of modern great powers does, and it is quite well referenced. And I can't fix things if you don't tell me what you don't like@Slatersteven Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 18:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We are not an RS, and I did say at least one other, but OK. Slatersteven (talk) 18:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We aren't, but what I am saying is that that articles claim of them being a great power are backed up by sources. I know that if we wanted to actually cite we would need to get the citations from the article, not cite it, but for the purposes of this discussion can you just lookat that article. And I told you my reason for the civilian thing but you never responded@Slatersteven Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 18:45, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually that list does not seem well sourced, which sources says Italy was a great power? Slatersteven (talk) 18:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually thats a great point, it seems a bit borderline but in it (Least of the great powers)@Slatersteven Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 18:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, when you're making "lots of changes" to a somewhat stable, essentially complete article, it's best to explain in the edit summary what kinds of changes you're making and why. If the changes are hard to explain, then I've found it's best to break down into separate edits with their own explanations. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 16:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, that's fair. Per WP:Work in Progress articles aren't done.@StefenTower Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 16:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

lede

We link in the section on the start of the war to the invasion Poland, and to Poland, nor do we need to say when it started as we already do, we do not need it again. Nor do we need a link to civilian, or indeed most of the other wiki links you created, they are meant only where people might not know what we mean. We also need to only link once to a page. That is just the lede. Slatersteven (talk) 18:48, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"they are meant only where people might not know what we mean" - that's true of all links and useless. every link in the article someone added is because someone might not know what they mean, and everything link could be linked under the possibly that someone doesn't know what it means. didn't know about the only linking once. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 18:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See
wp:overlinking. Slatersteven (talk) 18:52, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Time for others to chip in, this is bludgeoning. Slatersteven (talk) 18:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In fairness, we are the 2 people with a dispute, so it's not unreasonable that we are the 2 main people discussing. Also, didn't know about the overlinking. Means I probably shouldn't have linked civilian, but I think some of those links still make sense. And I still think we should change it from "Main Powers" to "Great Powers" in the infobox to clarify or reinsert my footnote. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 20:23, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the reverts here. Many of the edits were over-linking - this included repeatedly linking some articles such as Empire of Japan. The statement on who the supposed 'great powers' were adds nothing of use to the lead, and doesn't reflect modern historical writing, which includes a lot of debate over the status of France, Italy and - to a much lesser extent - the UK at the time given that their empires may have been overall burdens. The modern literature on the UK's role in the war also tends to stress the importance of the Commonwealth countries, India and key colonies to this as well. Making edits like this with hopelessly vague edit summaries is also a very poor practice. Nick-D (talk) 22:59, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cite error: There are <ref group=lower-alpha> tags or {{efn}} templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}} template or {{notelist}} template (see the help page).