User:Andrew c/test

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Homer

All of the Oxyrhynchus manuscripts of Homer are housed at the

Sackler Library. The majority of the manuscripts are in a scroll format, and all but one manuscript is on papyrus (P. Oxy. 3826 is on parchment). P. Oxy. 2747, 3826, and 3831 are codices
, while 2605, 4816, and 4817 are sheets. All off the manuscripts are damaged, and none of them are complete. The vast majority (if not all?) are fragments of a single folio (not sure if that term works with rolls).


Vol Oxy Date Content
XXII 2309 c. 1 Margites
XXX 2530 150? Iliad 19
XXXI 2540 100 Iliad xiii
XXXI 2541 250 Iliad xiv
XXXI 2542 100 Iliad xv
XXXI 2605 250 note mentioning Iliad ii
XXXVI 2747 500 Iliad II
XXXVI 2748 150 Iliad xvi
XLIV 3154 50 Iliad vi
XLIV 3155 200 Iliad xv
XLVII 3323 200 Iliad xv, xvi
XLIX 3438 200 Iliad i
XLIV 3439 150 Iliad v
XLIX 3441 150 Odyssey x
XLIX 3442 150 Odyssey xi
XLIV 3443 250 Odyssey xvii
LII 3661 200 Iliad 3
LII 3662 250 Iliad 5
LII 3663 250 Iliad 18
LVI 3825 125 Iliad 1
LVI 3826 400 Iliad 4, 5
LVI 3827 150 Iliad 11
LVI 3828 100 Odyssey xxii
LVI 3831 300 Homer Oracle
LIX 3963 150 Margites
LIX 3964 150 Margites
LXVII 4638 150 Iliad II
LXVIII 4668 200 Batrachomyomachia
LXXI 4813 250 Iliad I
LXXI 4814 325 Iliad III
LXXI 4815 200 Iliad V
LXXI 4816 500 Iliad XII
LXXI 4817 350 Iliad I +summary

NT Apoc

The Oxyrhynchus Papyri collection contains around 20 manuscripts of New Testament apocrypha, works from the early Christian period that . These works include the gospels of Thomas, Mary, Peter, James, The Shepherd of Hermas, and the Didache. Among this collection are also a few manuscripts of unknown gospels. The 3 manuscripts of Thomas represent the only known Greek manuscripts of this work; the only other surviving manuscript of Thomas is a nearly complete Coptic manuscript from the Nag Hammadi find.[1] P. Oxy. 4706, a manuscript of Hermas, is notable because two sections believed by scholars to have been often circulated independently, Visions and Mandata, were found on the same roll.[2]

  • P. Oxy. V 840 and P. Oxy. XV 1782 are vellum
  • 2949?, 3525, 3529? 4705, and 4706 are scrolls, the rest codices.
Vol Oxy Date Content Institution City, State Country
I 1 200 Gospel of Thomas Bodleian Library
Ms. Gr. Th. e 7 (P)
Oxford UK
II 210 250 Unknown gospel Cambridge University Library; Add. Ms. 4048 Cambridge UK
IV 654 200 Gospel of Thomas British Museum; Inv. 1531 London UK
IV 655 200 Gospel of Thomas Houghton Library,
Harvard
; SM Inv. 4367
Cambridge
Massachusetts
USA
V 840 200 Unknown gospel Bodleian Library
Ms. Gr. Th. g 11
Oxford UK
IX 1172 350 Hermas, Similitudes II 4-10
[same codex as 3526]
British Library; Inv. 224 London UK
X 1224 300 Unknown gospel Bodleian Library
Ms. Gr. Th. e 8 (P)
Oxford UK
XV 1782 350 Didache i-iii Ashmolean Museum Oxford UK
XVII 2067 450 Nicene Creed Ashmolean Museum Oxford UK
XLI 2949 200 Gospel of Peter? Ashmolean Museum Oxford UK
L 3524 550 Gospel of James 25:1 Ashmolean Museum Oxford UK
L 3525 250 Gospel of Mary Ashmolean Museum Oxford UK
L 3526 350 Hermas, Mandates 5-6
[same codex as 1172]
Ashmolean Museum Oxford UK
L 3527 200 Hermas, Similitudes VIII 4-5 Ashmolean Museum Oxford UK
L 3528 200 Hermas, Similitudes IX 20-22 Ashmolean Museum Oxford UK
L 3529 350 Passion of St. Dioscorus Ashmolean Museum Oxford UK
LX 4009 150 Gospel of Peter? Ashmolean Museum Oxford UK
LXIX 4705 250 Hermas Visions I 1.8-9 Ashmolean Museum Oxford UK
LXIX 4706 200 Hermas, Visions III-IV, Mandata II, IV-X Ashmolean Museum Oxford UK
LXIX 4707 250 Hermas, Similitudines VI 3-VII 2 Ashmolean Museum Oxford UK
  1. ^ Kirby, Peter. "Gospel of Thomas" (2001-2006) earlychristianwritings.com Retrieved June 30, 2007.


Joseph

Joseph "of the House of

Christian Gospel accounts, the husband of Mary[1] and supposed father of Jesus of Nazareth.[2] According to the Christian tradition, Joseph did not physically beget Jesus, as Mary had conceived the child through divine means (see virgin birth).[3]
Therefore, most Christians consider Joseph to be Jesus' foster or legal father.


Jesus

Jesus of Nazareth
culturally important
, no undisputed record of what Jesus looked like is known to exist.

Parables navbox test


Not sure if we need "Thomas". There are apparently 3 or so novel parables in Secret James as well, but they don't have articles (and I've seen some sources that list a 3rd Thomas parable). The extracanonical section is possibly slightly expandable. But in it's current state, as I said in the beginnin,g I'm not sure if we need the "Thomas" group. We could just list the 2 next to "extracanonical" and skip the navbox child. -
Andrew c [talk] 19:21, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


Collapsible


RCC template

{{
Roman Catholicism
}}
{{
Roman Catholicism
}}
{{Roman Catholicism2}}


Decalogue

Groups of precepts, containing ten commandments each, are found in other parts of the Pentateuch, and that has given rise to a problem that occupied an important place in Biblical study. Many exegetes have held the view that the original Decalogue is not that of chapter xx, but a different series of ten commandments, namely, the practical precepts in ch. xxxiv 14-26. This view, after being alluded to in ancient times, in a Greek book dating from the end of the fifth century C.E., was advanced in a youthful work of Goethe's; and since Wellhausen agreed with it and gave it scientific basis, it enjoyed popularity, and until recently was widely accepted among Biblical scholars. Its primary basis was the theory held by historians of religion and culture that ritualism antedated the development of ethical principles...

— Cassuto, U. A Commentary on the Book of Ecodus jerusalem: The Magnes Press, The Hebrew University (1967: first published in Hebrew in 1951) p. 237

We have already seen that the sources include independent law codes: the ritual or Yahwistic Decalogue in J (Exod. xxxiv. 10-26), the two forms of the ethical Decalogue in E and D (Exod. xx 1-17; Deut. v. 1-21); the Book of the Covenant in E (Exod. xx 22-xxii. 33); the series of twelve cursed in Deut. xxvii. 15-26 (probably not D); the Code of Holiness (Lev. xvii-xxvi).

— Anderson, George W. A Critical Introduction to the Old Testament Gerald Duckworth (1959) p.50

The account of the rewriting of the Ten Commandments in Exodus 34 (usually assigned to J) contains a decalogue quite different from that of Exodus 20 and Deuteronomy 5. Known as the "Ritual Decalogue" (as distinct from the "Ethical Decalogue") because of its predominantly cultic character, it embodies only three of the stipulations of the Ethical Decalogue (vss. 14, 17, 21), and some of its laws have their parallels in the Covenant Code (Ex. 20:22-23:33). Though resting perhaps on an ancient version of the Decaloque, in its extant form it is little more than conglomerate of heterogeneous cultic regulations. 57. Artur Weiser, The Old Testament6: Its fFormation and Development (New York: Association Press, 1961), p. 105

— West, James King. Introduction to the Old Testament: "Hear, O Israel" MacMillan 1971. p 147

In the Journal for the Study of the Old Testmanet, I found a review of David H. Aaron's Etched in Stone: The Emergence of the Decalogue (2006) T&T Clark

. I do not have access to the book, and obviously have not read it, but based on the review and the amazon description, he appears to treat the 3 decalogues on the same level, and comes to the conclusion that Ex. 34 is the earliest. The reviewer does have a parenthetical comment explaining the 3 decalogues, so perhaps that is an indication it is not a normal classificaiton. Aaron appears to be well trained, semi-well published, and employeed by a repitable institution. Not sure if his position is fringe, but I'd like to read how Aaron explains his claim of 3 decalogues.

References

  1. ^ Matthew 1:16
  2. ^ http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08504a.htm
  3. ^ Matthew 1:18–25, Luke 1:26–38. – Belief in the virgin conception and birth is held by Christians of most faith traditions [1], including Evangelicals [2], Roman Catholics [3], Eastern Orthodox, and most traditional Protestants [4].