User:Mojoworker
At some point I may actually add some narrative to my userpage. Awards
Subpages
Admin Dashboard
Administrative backlogReports
User-reported
Usernames for administrator attention
|
.svg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
 | This page has an no admin backlog }} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last Talk to my owner:Online 22:25, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
El Grande Americano
- )
Reason: Dispute over contents, editor who joined today making unencyclopedic and disruptive edits. [1] [2] [3] Diffs: [4] [5] [6] Lemonademan22 (talk) 00:01, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing - continuously adding hoaxes on these article. 158.140.174.54 (talk) 01:54, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by mass-anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 02:22, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason:
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 11:37, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: WP:ARBAI and vandalism. 67.63.51.242 (talk) 12:01, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 12:44, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Lets see if we can get them to talk page. Moxy🍁 13:02, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing IP edit warring to replace the word "partner" with "pardner". Nat Gertler (talk) 13:15, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits. Hotwiki (talk) 13:25, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous editors stemming from previous page protection. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:01, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last Talk to my owner:Online 14:03, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated IP vandalism, hopping to different addresses. Rulue (talk) 14:24, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection:
) 16:15, 9 July 2025 (UTC)Reason: Edit warring, Persistent IP vandalism and providing legally proven false information 91.200.207.202 (talk) 16:46, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Even with the huge "THIS IS NOT THE PLACE TO ASK SORA A QUESTION" banner, on a semi-regular basis such questions are added here. It's annoying, and unfortunately there aren't many page watchers, so the requests tend to linger for a long time. They almost always come from IP editors with no edit history. Page protection might cut down on this. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 17:58, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Aintabli (talk) 18:38, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
Semi-protection: Persistent
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—Talk to my owner:Online 09:07, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection:
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive editing has persisted yet again after protection lapsed. Requesting ECP and to go longer this time. — Trailblazer101🔥 (discuss · contribs) 23:13, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism and unsourced rumours. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 00:53, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
) 00:58, 10 July 2025 (UTC)Semi-protection: Persistent
) 01:33, 10 July 2025 (UTC)Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent unexplained template and citation removals, broken grammar copyedit by unregistered and newly registered users. UmbyUmbreon (talk) 03:31, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 08:43, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
- Just want to +1 this, it's relevant to the WP:ARBPIA ctop. Smallangryplanet (talk) 11:59, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection:
Reason: Persistent removal of content by several IPs since 1 day ago. hundenvonPG (talk) 12:34, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from several IPs for the past 10 days hundenvonPG (talk) 12:36, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent
Reason: Prone to mass vandalism due to the 1 TB leaks Dingle69420 (talk) 13:11, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent
Semi-protection: Persistent
Semi-protection: Persistent
) 14:43, 10 July 2025 (UTC)Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Frequent target for good faith yet nonconstructive edits, also evidence of fairly recent vandalism in the page history and protection log. Might be worth keeping an eye on this one long term. Entranced98 (talk) 15:11, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 16:29, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 17:07, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 17:08, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of
) 17:34, 10 July 2025 (UTC)Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. It's apparently very funny to change Cnut to Cunt. TylerBurden (talk) 17:56, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 0 protected edit requests | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 15:34, 10 July 2025 (UTC) |
| 19 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 17:13, 10 July 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
Hi. Based upon my learning and experience over the years of editing on Wikipedia (almost a decade now), I have created very selected pages which I find qualifying Wikipedia policies. If I find them trending in news but un-complying with the policies, I usually leave a redirect, or occasionally start with the draft. I believe not a single page that I created and/or majorly contributed has been deleted, and many respected editors and admins whom I had interacted with have always been helpful and supportive, believing in my good faith. Plus I only rewrite those articles in bad state which I find relevant, and not every other random article. However, due to recent attacks by sock puppetry over my edits, I want to be an autopatrolled user, so that I can easily continue volunteering independently here, and participate in the ongoing Destubathon as well. I promise I will not misuse this position. Thank you! M. Billoo 13:24, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Requested this permission ~2 months ago, denied because I was mostly creating auto-notable stubs. I think I have expanded the types of articles I create, including well-sourced local pages or biographical entries where I take time to source subjects that do not inherently meet a generic notability criteria. (I still do create auto-notable pages sometimes, but those no longer make up the majority of pages I create.) As a new page reviewer, I got good experience with the notability guidelines reviewing articles during the backlog drive WP:MAY25, and also participating in AfD. Thought about requesting again as I have run into a few of my own pages while reviewing pages that are in topics I contribute to/am interested in. Yoblyblob (Talk ) :) 02:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
7-year vet of the site, multiple GANs and DYKs, 51 mainspace articles created of which 49 are live (G6 and G7 deletions for the other two). Etzedek24 (Talk) (Contribs) 20:54, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
Resubmitting #User:Human Right Wiki above as a procedural action, not an endorsement on the merits. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:39, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello there, my respect to you! I would like to request for getting autopatrolled rights because I contribute interesting articles to both English and Simple Wikipedia. I have over 700 edits, which is over the requirements, and my account is over 3 months old. If I get autopatrolled rights, I will never forget this appreciation I got and I will continue contributing to Wikipedia, and I will also continue to take responsibilities for my actions. Thanks! Waiting for a feedback. :-) Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 13:06, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
I have been on Wikipedia for more than a decade, and I truly feel that it is one of my great passions in life. I have more than 30,000 edits, and I am credited with more than 300 articles that are not Redirects or Disambiguation pages. (I personally take credit for more than 100 of these, which did not originate as Redirect pages.) Although I continue to propose Draft pages to this day when I am not 100% confident myself about notability, I frequently go straight to the mainspace and have made a number of articles that have been significant in some form or field, with my particular focus being on film industry and electoral politics pages. Recently, I redirected a few thousand Supreme Court of the United States cases to the case volumes in which they were listed. It was a large-scale project for me, but in the end it was decided that redlinks would be better for promoting caseload knowledge, something that I agreed to and I believe will continue to service our Wikipedia community. For this reason, it might appear that I have a large number of deleted pages, but this is almost exclusively due to this particular project; I had an edit deletion rate of less than 2%, and I had not had a page that I created taken down in years, not since I was a far more novice editor. (You can read more about that SCOTUS discussion here.) I believe that being autopatrolled will continue to allow me to contribute to the Wikipedia community, and that is why I am reaching out to ask for permissions. I am happy to answer any questions or improve any articles that I have created if there is anything noticeable that needs help. Although I have long been looking to increase my permissions and role in the community, I quite frankly have always had impostor syndrome stop me from asking, but a bit of encouragement from Liz made me try. Thank you so much! PickleG13 (talk) 20:27, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
This editor has created quite a few articles related to archeological sites recently; I marked the most recent ones as reviewed and a random sampling of the others showed no major issues. I will note that his creation Shadows at the Door: The Podcast was deleted at AfD early last year, but that seems to be an outlier in his work, and the issue has not come up again in the 25+ creations since. I don't believe NPP needs to be going over his submissions any longer. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:41, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
text-source integrity, and they were all generally well-written and -formatted. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh ) 09:45, 10 July 2025 (UTC) |
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
Requesting access for generic fixes on older articles that may need maintenance. ɴɪᴋᴏʟᴀɪᴠᴇᴋᴛᴏᴠɪᴄʜ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ/ᴄᴏɴᴛʀɪʙ) 16:19, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
For easier editing and better experience. Zuck28 (talk) 19:24, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Need to update pages that have an incorrect team name. Assadzadeh (talk) 06:14, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag. |
|---|
Extended confirmed |
Requests for event coordinator |
|---|
Event coordinator
I'm co-organizing an edit-a-thon at an academic conference: https://outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/courses/EC_conference/EC'25_Wiki_edit-a-thon?enroll=owsebpjm EC (https://ec25.sigecom.org/) is the main academic conference at the intersection of Economics and Computer Science. We're hosting an edit-a-thon to encourage conference attendees to edit, with a focus on technical entries at the interface of our research and general public interest. Aviad.rubinstein (talk) 17:51, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting event coordinator rights I occasionally help out with events - and expect to do this again more often in the future (recently in the Bay Area, going forward in the Netherlands). Being able to create accounts without hitting rate limits due to event-shared wifi would be helpful! In a pinch, I could rely on my adminship in nlwiki, but that feels like an undesirable workaround. This request is triggered specifically by an event on 8 July 2025 at Stanford (which is also referenced by Aviad above), but will be useful beyond that. effeietsanders 00:44, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
I am looking to host some events with at my library, and we are planning on focusing on building out more along the lines of the Women in Red campaign. Iljhgtn (talk) 04:08, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for file mover |
|---|
File mover
I'm requesting the file mover rights as I usually help out here. The backlogs here can take a lot of time. It would be helpful if I'm able to move the files myself. I don't have a lot of uploads (I only have 5-6). I'm familiar with most of the policies of files OPHYRIUS ⚔ 05:34, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for mass message sender |
|---|
Mass message sender
I’d like to welcome new Wikipedia users."I think I can do very well with this responsibility, if you entrust me. I have submitted my application for this term. THANKS. Olitun (talk) 08:20, 10 July 2025 (UTC) |
Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
I was granted reviewer rights for two times, both were temporary. I'm here requesting the right again to review the articles and make the burden less for others too. I was not active like before due to some personal issues, but I'm going to be active now. Please consider extending my rights. Thankyou Taabii (talk) 17:23, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello there, this is my third time requesting new page reviewer permissions, as the previous two requests were granted on a one-month trial basis and the current trial will end on the 30th of June. I have learnt a lot about the policies for notability and inclusion and will be able to reduce the size of the unreviewed pages backlog significantly. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 06:07, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
My current NPR rights are due to expire on 1 July 2025. While I may not be reviewing in large volumes, I focus on thorough, policy-aligned reviews that aim to improve or appropriately tag each page. I’d like to keep my NPR rights for continued constructive contributions. Thank You. Ambrosiawater (talk) 07:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
I'm interested in doing NPP reviews. I think I've gone over the rules for creating new pages and and using references pretty thoroughly. ColinSchm (talk) 12:07, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi! I want to help out with NPP as there is been a longstanding backlog. I requested this right last year, but was told participate more in AfD discussions. Since, I have participated and as well as nominated for deletions. I think I'm ready now, thanks! Vestrian24Bio 02:57, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi! I'm currently an AfC reviewer and would like to request NPP rights. I've been interested in patrolling new pages for a while, thanks for considering! Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 09:16, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
I'm requesting new page reviewer rights because I would like to help reduce the NPP backlog. I've been an AfC reviewer for a few months, and I also participate at AfD. I believe that I know what pages are and aren't acceptable. Thanks for considering my request. Opm581 (talk | he/him) 10:05, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I have over 2,700+ edits and have been editing for over 4 months. I would like to be able to review new pages and reduce the ever expanding backlog. Floating Orb (talk) 01:38, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
I have a temporary NPP right with which I participated in the May 2025 Backlog Drive reviewing over 350 articles and was awarded two heartwarming sleek awards (on a lighter note though). I'm requesting that the right be renewed to continue reviewing articles. Mekomo (talk) 10:33, 7 July 2025 (UTC)o
Hello - I am happy to contribute and help work on the backlog. I meet all the criteria and promise to not abuse the role in any way. JazzyOxygen (talk) 14:55, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Previously, I withdrew my request because I felt I needed more experience with Wikipedia’s guidelines. I made a good-faith mistake, but with guidance from senior editors, I’ve learned from the experience and am committed to ensuring it doesn’t happen again. Currently, I serve as an AFC reviewer, primarily focusing on South Asia-related articles especially those related to India. I have a solid understanding of the reliability of Indian sources, which allows me to review such content with confidence and care. I am now requesting the New Page Reviewer (NPP) right. If granted, I intend to limit my reviews to India-related articles, as I believe in contributing only in areas where I have strong subject knowledge. You may consider granting me this right on a trial basis, and if my work is found suitable, I would be happy to reapply for a more permanent role. If you have any concerns about my editing, I fully understand if the request is declined, and I would sincerely appreciate any suggestions or guidance on areas where I can improve to meet the required standards. Afstromen (talk) 20:31, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I have over 2,700+ edits and have been editing for over 4 months. I would like to be able to review new pages and reduce the ever expanding backlog. Floating Orb (talk) 01:38, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi! I want to help out with NPP as there is been a longstanding backlog. Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 00:43, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
I'm already an AfC reviewer, and I would like to better improve the encyclopedia and the pages on it. ProtobowlAddict talk! 14:28, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi. I had been granted for temporary new page reviewer right which will be expiring on 31 July 2025. With which I participated in May 2025 backlog drive. I request you to make it permanent for continuous review of articles. Thank You! Fade258 (talk) 15:01, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, my new page reviewer right has expired, I'd like to renew it, thanks. JohnMizuki (talk) 00:57, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I am Justier100 requesting for Page Reviewer because I would like to help reduce the NPP backlog. Thank you Justier100 (talk) 05:00, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request the New Page Reviewer user right. I have been a registered user on the English Wikipedia since November 2011 and have made over 11,800 edits, including more than 5,000 undeleted mainspace edits. I have created pages here and there over the years, focusing largely on Zambian mostly and other topics of intrest, I believe I have a solid understanding of key content policies and guidelines such as WP:PROD. I am applying because I believe I can contribute positively to the backlog reduction effort. I understand the challenges faced by patrollers, and I would like to assist in reviewing pages, identifying those that meet Wikipedia’s standards, and helping maintain the quality of new content. I will do my best to interact with others in a civil and constructive manner and have no behavioral blocks or edit-warring issues. I am committed to supporting quality control on new pages solely as a volunteer. Icem4k (talk ) 13:33, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
You are granted me.I want to work new article review only Indian Article because I know this. Olitun (talk) 17:04, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I was granted the rights on a trial basis for 30 days. Today, my rights expired. Until now, I have completed over 66+ reviews, aiming to minimize the backlog as much as I can, with the aim of reviewing 30 to 100 pages minimum in each month. I know my reviewing speed may look slow but for me Quality is more important than speed. I want to have the right permanently so that I can contribute to the enormous backlog, specifically related to women and plants. Thank you Pasados (talk) 17:11, 10 July 2025 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for the page mover flag. |
|---|
Page mover |
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights and also the rollback right so I can help revert vandalism and also help review pending changes. Allblessed (talk) 00:04, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi there, I have a good amount of mainspace edits and article created, I'm requesting PCR right if possible. Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 00:54, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'd like to request the PCR right. I primarily spend my time on Wikipedia patrolling RC for vandalism and other problematic edits and occasionally come across pending change edits there. While I enjoy RC patrol, I would like to expand how I can help contribute here and PCR seems like a logical next step. I've read through the PCR criteria and guidelines and believe I have a decent understanding of the various content policies. Please let me know if you have any questions or see any issues. Thank you. Nubzor (T | C) 01:30, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
Hi I am requesting rights to use the rollback feature as finding vandalism has actually been a very cool thing for me. I am requesting to be able so I don't have to undo multiple edits by spam-vandals, as I feel like it makes me kind of a spammer when I do this, and doing it all at once would be a great thing. I will admit that I had absolutely no idea that anyone could post warnings on talk pages, I thought that only admins and other experienced members who are given rights could do so. I just want to feel like less of a spammer when reverted edits, so I am requesting this rollback feature. Thanks, MakaylaHippo1998 MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 05:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I've been RC Patrolling for a few years now (more consistently recently, but intermittently before that), and I think counter-vandalism work has been the bulk of all the edits I've ever made on Wikipedia. I hadn't bothered to request Rollbacker before this as I've been getting on quite well with Twinkle for a long while now so I didn't really see the point. However, more recently, as I've spent longer and more regular periods of time reverting larger quantities of edits, I've been getting a bit frustrated with some of the slowdowns with Twinkle. I am requesting Rollbacker as I've heard it's a lot faster and smoother than Twinkle, and I am also interested in trying out some of the rollbacker tools (e.g. Huggle) to see if they work well for me and if I can use them to combat vandalism more effectively. Thanks! SI09 (talk) 18:34, 6 July 2025 (UTC) SI09 (talk) 18:34, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I am a CVU on the German Wikipedia and I am becoming more involved into fighting X-Wiki vandalism. On dewp I am Sichter (Rollback&Review) and temporary-account-viewer. Since my intentions are to fight global vandalism, I will not use the user right locally until I have studied Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback. NDG (talk) 07:49, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor |