User talk:Thelb4/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Archive 1 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7

Radio Times reference

Thanks for providing the Radio Times reference for Daleks in Manhattan. Would you mind doing the same for the plot section at 42 (Doctor Who)? I'd do it, but I don't have the magazine myself, so I don't know the page number and details like that. Thanks! —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 10:16, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Caps United Zim.gif)

Thanks for uploading

our fair use policy
).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:11, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:The Edge of Destruction book cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading

boilerplate fair use template
, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to

fair use rationale
.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Tony Sidaway 22:39, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello Thelb4, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as

GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk
07:55, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello Thelb4, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as

GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk
09:47, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

here
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

ShadowHalo
22:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Graham-norton-maria.jpg

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading

first fair use criterion
in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to
    di-replaceable fair use disputed
    }}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our

Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast
14:52, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale
.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 00:45, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:01x04-ParentHood.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale
.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 00:45, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:01x05-TurkFlu.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale
.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 00:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:01x06-TheTaxmanCometh.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale
.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 00:47, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:01x07-Brothers.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale
.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 00:47, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Please re-register

Hello, Thelb4! You are receiving this notice because the Cleanup Taskforce has been inactive, as a result of this all active taskforce members are being asked to re-register.

For more information see: Wikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce/Not Dead Yet

If you do not re-register here within 15 days of receiving this notice your name will be removed from the membership list (if you were unable to reply to this notice in time, you can just add you name back).

RJFJR 03:23, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Luxembourgish Wikipedia

A {{

db-author}}. P4k
05:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:How_solve_problem_maria.jpg

I have tagged

18:29, 14 September 2007 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Theme Park Inc 1.png

Thanks for uploading

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

talk
) 02:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter, March 2008

The Space-Time Telegraph
The
WikiProject Doctor Who
newsletter
Issue 1 March 2008
Project News
We have five new participants: .
One editor has left the project:
StuartDD
.
The Doctor Who portal has expanded to increase the number of selected stories to 33.
Articles of note
New featured articles
None
New featured article candidates
New good articles
Delisted articles
None
Proposals
A proposal for changing the layout of the episode pages is under way
here
.
A discussion about the formatting of the cast lists in episode pages is under way here.
A discussion to move
here
.
News
The
Torchwood project
has become a task-force under the project's scope.
The
4th series of Doctor Who
will start to air on 5th April.

For the Doctor Who project, Sceptre (talk) 19:35, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
You have received this letter because you are on the newsletter recipients list. To opt-out, please remove your name.

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Hi Thelb4!
We thank you for uploading

image description page
. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the

robot. --John Bot III (talk
) 15:34, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (August)

--

(talk)
22:42, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Land27011.PNG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Schumi555 (talk
) 21:48, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (September)

--

(talk)
18:22, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

talk
) 07:48, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Proof that 22/7 exceeds π

At talk:Proof that 22/7 exceeds π, you wrote:

Sorry if this seems stupid, but I don't know why this article exists. Do we also need to prove that 4 is bigger than 3? That 50 is bigger than 1.2? No.
I can see it now:
'Proof that 4 exceeds 3'

Well, pardon me if these seems blunt, but that question does seem stupid, but also seems puzzling: I wonder just what people like you who ask that question could have in mind (and you may have noticed that several people raised the same question in the extensive deletion discussion).

I wonder whether those who ask that question even know how to prove, only by a loose heuristic argument, that π > 3 or that π < 4. Are those things that you know how to do, or do you just take the textbook's word for it that π = 3.14159...? If that last possibility is the case then you've cut yourself off from the means of understanding anything. Michael Hardy (talk) 17:53, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

In response to your post on my talk page:
The textbook says: circumference of a circle / diameter of same circle = pi.
In school, one is taught this and looks at circles and manages to work out a couple of decimal places of pi. Mathematical people have proved time and time again that pi ~ (from memory) 3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820974944. That is less than 22/7 (work it out). Ergo, pi < 22/7.
I think many people who are not as well versed in maths as most of the editors of that page would not understand why that page exists, and it needs to be made clearer to them (me included). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thelb4 (talkcontribs)

That is a truly bizarre way of viewing things, almost bordering on psychotic, as it appears to me. We face a question:

Question: How do we humans know that pi = 3.14159..., etc., so that we can assert that in our textbooks?
Thelb4's Answer: Because our textbooks tell us so. And "mathematical people have proved it".
Question: How did they prove it?
Thelb4's Answer: The textbooks and the history books say they have. That's how. Therefore we don't need Wikipedia articles that explain how.

You stop BARELY short of asserting that that number was brought down from Mount Sinai by a prophet and that that's how we know it. The article on which you comment, on the other hand, tries to EXPLAIN how it can be known (although not as many digits as you quote above).

You claim that in school you worked out a couple of decimal places by "looking at circles". I don't know how I would do that. I do know how I can quickly show that pi is more than 3 but less than 4. And it's NOT by saying "we were taught that, and the textbooks say it".

To say that we know that pi is less than 22/7 because we know that pi is 3.14159etc., is a put the cart before the horse. The article MUST start from the assumption that we DON'T know that sort of thing. Any reasonable reader would be very offended if it didn't. Michael Hardy (talk) 19:06, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

PS: I used template:unsigned on your comments because you didn't put four tildes ~~~~ after them so that your signature and the date and time stamp would appear. Michael Hardy (talk) 19:08, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (September II)

--

(talk)
19:14, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: Image:Grand Army Plaza Herald edited.jpg

talk
) 10:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (October)

--

(talk)
16:14, 6 November 2008 (UTC)


WPF1 Newsletter (November)

Cs-wolves(talk) 12:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (December)

Cs-wolves(talk) 04:35, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Many Thanks

Thanks Thelb4 for the help in editing and finally giving the article

History of University of Santo Tomas
a Good Article status! I don't know where to put this acknowledgment appropriately. Again, thank you!


WPF1 Newsletter (January)

Cs-wolves(talk) 21:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (February)

Cs-wolves(talk) 10:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (March)

Cs-wolves(talk) 12:33, 7 April 2009 (UTC)