Benjamin N. Cardozo

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Benjamin N. Cardozo
Supreme Court of New York for the First Judicial Division
In office
January 5, 1914 – January 15, 1917 (Sitting by designation in the Court of Appeals from February 2, 1914)
Preceded byBartow S. Weeks
Succeeded bySamuel H. Ordway
Personal details
Born
Benjamin Nathan Cardozo

(1870-05-24)May 24, 1870
New York City, U.S.
DiedJuly 9, 1938(1938-07-09) (aged 68)
Port Chester, New York, U.S.
Political partyDemocratic
Parent
EducationColumbia University (AB, MA)

Benjamin Nathan Cardozo (May 24, 1870 – July 9, 1938) was an American lawyer and jurist who served on the New York Court of Appeals from 1914 to 1932 and as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1932 until his death in 1938. Cardozo is remembered for his significant influence on the development of American common law in the 20th century, in addition to his philosophy and vivid prose style.

Born in New York City, Cardozo passed the bar in 1891 after attending Columbia Law School. He won an election to the New York Supreme Court in 1913 but joined the New York Court of Appeals the following year. He won election as Chief Judge of that court in 1926. As Chief Judge, he wrote majority opinions on cases such as Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co.

In 1932, President

U.S. Supreme Court to succeed Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. Cardozo served on the Court until his death in 1938, and formed part of the liberal bloc of justices known as the Three Musketeers. He wrote the Court's majority opinion in notable cases such as Nixon v. Condon (1932) and Steward Machine Co. v. Davis
(1937).

Early life and family

Cardozo, the son of Rebecca Washington (née Nathan) and

Portuguese-Jewish community, and affiliated with Manhattan’s Congregation Shearith Israel. Their ancestors had immigrated to the British colonies from London, England, before the American Revolution
.

The family were descended from Jewish-origin

conversos. They left the Iberian Peninsula for Holland during the Inquisition.[2] There they returned to the practice of Judaism. Cardozo family tradition held that their marrano (New Christians who maintained crypto-Jewish practices in secrecy) ancestors were from Portugal,[2] although Cardozo’s ancestry has not been firmly traced to that country.[3] But ”Cardozo” (archaic spelling of Cardoso), ”Seixas”, and ”Mendes” are the Portuguese
, rather than Spanish, spelling of those common Iberian surnames.

Benjamin Cardozo had a fraternal twin, his sister Emily. They had four other siblings, including an older sister Nell and older brother.

Benjamin was named for his uncle, Benjamin Nathan, a vice president of the New York Stock Exchange, who was murdered in 1870. The case was never solved.[4] Among their many cousins, given their deep history in the US, was the poet Emma Lazarus. Other earlier relations include Francis Lewis Cardozo (1836–1903), Thomas Cardozo, and Henry Cardozo, free men of color of Charleston, South Carolina. Francis became a Presbyterian minister in New Haven, Connecticut, after education in Scotland, and was elected Secretary of State of South Carolina during the Reconstruction era. Later he worked as an educator in Washington, DC, under a Republican administration.[5]

Association of the Bar of the City of New York
. After leaving the court, the senior Cardozo practiced law for nearly two decades more until his death in 1885.

When Benjamin and Emily were young, their mother Rebecca died. The twins were raised during much of their childhood largely by their sister Nell, who was 11 years older. Benjamin remained devoted to her throughout his life.

Education

One of Benjamin’s tutors was

Horatio Alger.[6]

At age 15, Cardozo entered Columbia University,[6] where he was elected to Phi Beta Kappa,[7] earning his BA in 1889 and his MA in 1890.[8] He was admitted to Columbia Law School in 1889. Cardozo wanted to enter a profession that could enable him to support himself and his siblings, but he also hoped to restore the family name, which had been sullied by his father’s actions as a judge. Cardozo left law school after two years without a law degree,[9][10] as only two years of law school was required to sit for the bar during this era in New York.

Legal career

Law practice

Cardozo passed the bar examination in 1891 and began practicing appellate law alongside his older brother.[6] Benjamin Cardozo practiced law in New York City until year-end 1913 with Simpson, Warren and Cardozo.[6][11]

Interested in advancement and restoring the family name, Cardozo ran for a judgeship on the New York Supreme Court. In November 1913, Cardozo was elected by a large margin to a 14-year term on that court and took office on January 1, 1914.

New York Court of Appeals

In February 1914, Cardozo was designated to the New York Court of Appeals under the Amendment of 1899.[12] He was reportedly the first Jewish person to serve on the Court of Appeals.

In January 1917, he was appointed by the governor to a regular seat on the Court of Appeals to fill the vacancy caused by the resignation of

Republican
tickets to a 14-year term on the Court of Appeals.

In

United States Supreme Court
.

His tenure was marked by a number of original rulings, in tort and contract law in particular. This is partly due to timing; rapid industrialization was forcing courts to look anew at old common law components to adapt to new settings.[6]

In 1921, Cardozo gave the Storrs Lectures at

Restatement of the Law of Torts, Contracts, and a host of other private law subjects. He wrote three other books that also became standards in the legal world.[6]

While on the Court of Appeals, he criticized the exclusionary rule as developed by the federal courts, saying: ”The criminal is to go free because the constable has blundered”. He noted that many states had rejected the rule, but suggested that the adoption by the federal courts would affect the practice in the sovereign states.[13][14][15][16]

United States Supreme Court

Justice Cardozo in his judicial robes
Cardozo’s Supreme Court nomination

On February 15, 1932, President

associate justice of the United States Supreme Court,[17] to succeed Oliver Wendell Holmes. The New York Times said of Cardozo’s appointment that "seldom, if ever, in the history of the Court has an appointment been so universally commended."[18] The Democrat Cardozo's appointment by a Republican president has been referred to as one of the few Supreme Court appointments in history that was not motivated by partisanship or politics, but strictly based on the nominee's contribution to law.[19]

He was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on February 24, 1932,

William E. Borah
of Idaho, added his strong support for Cardozo, however, Hoover finally bowed to the pressure.

Cardozo was a member of the Three Musketeers, along with Brandeis and Stone, who were considered to be the liberal faction of the Supreme Court. In his years as an associate justice, Cardozo wrote opinions that stressed the necessity for the tightest adherence to the Tenth Amendment.

In his own words

Cardozo’s opinion of himself shows some of the same flair as his legal opinions:[tone]

In truth, I am nothing but a plodding mediocrity—please observe, a plodding mediocrity—for a mere mediocrity does not go very far, but a plodding one gets quite a distance. There is joy in that success, and a distinction can come from courage, fidelity and industry.[22]

Honors

Cardozo received the honorary degree of LL.D. from several colleges and universities, including: Columbia (1915); Yale (1921); New York (1922); Michigan (1923); Harvard (1927); St. John’s (1928); St. Lawrence (1932); Williams (1932); Princeton (1932); Pennsylvania (1932); Brown (1933); and Chicago (1933).[23]


Personal life

Cardozo had an apartment in this building in Washington, D.C.

As an adult, Cardozo no longer practiced Judaism (he identified as an agnostic), but he was proud of his Jewish heritage.[24]

Of the six children born to Albert and Rebecca Cardozo, only his twin sister Emily married. She and her husband did not have any children.

Constitutional law scholar Jeffrey Rosen noted in a New York Times Book Review of Richard Polenberg’s book on Cardozo:

Polenberg describes Cardozo’s lifelong devotion to his older sister Nell, with whom he lived in New York until her death in 1929. When asked why he had never married, Cardozo replied, quietly and sadly, ”I never could give Nellie the second place in my life”.

Cardozo's gravesite

In late 1937, Cardozo had a heart attack, and in early 1938, he suffered a stroke. He died on July 9, 1938, at the age of 68. He was buried in Beth Olam Cemetery in Queens.[25][26]

Ethnicity

Cardozo was the second Jewish justice to be appointed to the Supreme Court. The first was Louis Brandeis, whose family was Ashkenazi.

Cardozo was born into the

Spanish and Portuguese Jewish community, which had traditions distinct from the Ashkenazi. Since the appointment of Justice Sonia Sotomayor in the 21st century, some commentators have suggested that Cardozo should be considered the ”first Hispanic justice”.[27][28][29]

In response to this controversy, Cardozo biographer Kaufman questioned the usage of the term ”Hispanic” in Justice Cardozo’s lifetime, stating: ”Well, I think he regarded himself as a

Sephardic Jew whose ancestors came from the Iberian Peninsula”.[30] After centuries in British North America, Cardozo "confessed in 1937 that his family preserved neither the Spanish language nor Iberian cultural traditions”.[31]
Ancestors had lived in England, the British colonies, and the United States since the 17th century.

Some Latino advocacy groups, such as the

National Association of Latino Elected Officials and the Hispanic National Bar Association, consider Sonia Sotomayor to be the first Hispanic justice, as in their view she was raised in Hispanic culture.[27][30]

Cases

New York Courts
  • Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, 105 N.E. 92 (1914) it is necessary to get informed consent from a patient before operation, but a non-profit hospital was not vicariously liable (the latter aspect was reversed in 1957)
  • MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 111 N.E. 1050 (1916) ending privity as a prerequisite to duty in product liability by ruling that manufacturers of products could be held liable for injuries to consumers even if they were not in privity.
  • third party beneficiary
    law in a contract for marriage case.
  • Wood v. Lucy, Lady Duff-Gordon, 118 N.E. 214 (1917) on an implied promise to do something constituting consideration in a contract.
  • Martin v. Herzog, 126 N.E. 814 (1920) breach of statutory duty establishes negligence, and the elements of the claim includes proof of causation
  • Jacob & Youngs v. Kent
    , 230 N.Y. 239 (1921), substantial performance of a contract does not lead to a right to terminate, only damages.
  • Hynes v. New York Central Railroad Company, 131 N.E. 898 (1921), a railway owed a duty of care despite the victims being trespassers.
  • Glanzer v Shepard, 233 N.Y. 236, 135 N.E. 275, 23 A.L.R. 1425 (1922), a Caballero bean weighing dispute, with duties imposed by law but growing out of contract
  • corporate veil
    cannot be pierced, even in favor of a tort victim unless domination of a subsidiary by the parent is complete.
  • Wagner v. International Railway, 232 N.Y. 176 (1926) the rescue doctrine. ”Danger invites rescue. The cry of distress is the summons to relief [...] The emergency begets the man. The wrongdoer may not have foreseen the coming of a deliverer. He is accountable as if he had”.
  • fiduciary duty
    of business partners is, ”Not honesty alone, but the punctilio of an honor the most sensitive”.
  • Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 162 N.E. 99 (1928) the development of the concept of the proximate cause in tort law.
  • Jessie Schubert v. August Schubert Wagon Company, 164 N.E. 42 (1929) Respondeat superior and spousal immunity relationship are not related.
  • Murphy v. Steeplechase Amusement Park, 166 N.E. 173 (1929) denied a right to recover for knee injury from riding ”The Flopper” funride since the victim ”assumed the risk”.
  • Ultramares v. Touche
    , 174 N.E. 441 (1931) on the limitation of liability of auditors
US Supreme Court
  • Nixon v. Condon, 286 U.S. 73 (1932) all white Texas Democratic Party primary unconstitutional
  • Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111 (1933) which concerns Internal Revenue Code Section 162 and the meaning of ”ordinary” business deductions.
  • Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan, 293 U.S. 388 (1935) dissenting from a narrow interpretation of the Commerce Clause.
  • commerce clause
    power.
  • Carter v. Carter Coal Company
    , 298 U.S. 238 (1936) dissenting over the scope of the Commerce Clause.
  • Steward Machine Company v. Davis
    , 301 U.S. 548 (1937) unemployment compensation and social security were constitutional
  • Helvering v. Davis, 301 U.S. 619 (1937) social security not a contributory programme
  • Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319 (1937) the due process clause incorporated those rights which were ”implicit in the concept of ordered liberty”.

Schools, organizations, buildings and ships named after Cardozo

Bibliography

  • Cardozo, Benjamin N. (1921), The Nature of the Judicial Process, The Storrs Lectures Delivered at Yale University.
  • Cardozo, Benjamin N. (1924), The Growth of the Law, 5 Additional Lectures Delivered at Yale University.
  • Cardozo, Benjamin N. (1928). The Paradoxes of Legal Science.
    OCLC 843833
    .
  • Cardozo, Benjamin N. (1931), Law and Literature and Other Essays and Addresses.
  • Cardozo, Benjamin N. (1889), The Altruist in Politics, commencement oration at Columbia College, Gutenberg Project version.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ a b "Justices 1789 to Present". Washington, D.C.: Supreme Court of the United States. Retrieved February 15, 2022.
  2. ^ from the original on 2020-12-18. Retrieved 2020-10-01.
  3. ^ "Mark Sherman, 'First Hispanic justice? Some say it was Cardozo', The Associated Press, 2009". Archived from the original on 2020-11-14. Retrieved 2016-11-10.
  4. .
  5. ^ Richardson, Joe M. ”Francis L. Cardozo: Black educator during reconstruction”. Journal of Negro Education 48.1 (1979): 73–83. in JSTOR Archived 2020-07-27 at the Wayback Machine
  6. ^ . Retrieved 2008-10-21.
  7. ^ "Supreme Court Justices Who Are Phi Beta Kappa Members" (PDF). PBK.org. Phi Beta Kappa. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-09-28. Retrieved October 4, 2009.
  8. ^ "Columbia university alumni register, 1754-1931, compiled by the Committee on general catalogue". HathiTrust. Retrieved 2024-02-26.
  9. ^ Levy, Beryl Harold (November 2007). "Realist Jurisprudence and Prospective Overruling". New York Review of Books. LIV (17): 10, n. 31.
  10. ^ "Cardozo, Benjamin N". Great American Judges: An Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. 2003. p. 155.
  11. from the original on 21 November 2016. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  12. ^ Designation Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine, The New York Times, February 3, 1914
  13. ^ People of the State of New York v. John Defore, 150 N.E. 585 (1926).
  14. ^ Stagg, Tom, Judge, United States District Court Western District of Louisiana (July 15, 1991). "Letter to the Editor". The New York Times. Shreveport, La. Archived from the original on March 9, 2021. Retrieved January 7, 2013.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  15. .
  16. ^ a b McMillion, Barry J. (January 28, 2022). Supreme Court Nominations, 1789 to 2020: Actions by the Senate, the Judiciary Committee, and the President (PDF) (Report). Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Retrieved February 15, 2022.
  17. ^ "Cardozo is named to Supreme Court". The New York Times. 1932-02-16. Archived from the original on 2018-07-20. Retrieved 2018-07-23.
  18. . Retrieved 2008-10-20.
  19. ^ (The New York Times, March 2, 1932, p. 13)
  20. ^ (Handler, 1995)
  21. ^ As quoted in Nine Old Men (1936) by Drew Pearson and Robert Sharon Allen, p. 221.
  22. ^ Death Notices: Supplement to General Alumni Catalog. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan. 1939. p. 16. Archived from the original on 2021-05-06. Retrieved 2020-10-01.
  23. ^ Benjamin Cardozo. Archived 2016-10-21 at the Wayback Machine, Jewish Virtual Library,
  24. ^ "Christensen, George A. (1983) Here Lies the Supreme Court: Gravesites of the Justices, Yearbook". Archived from the original on 2005-09-03. Retrieved 2013-11-24.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) Supreme Court Historical Society at Internet Archive.
  25. ^ See also, Christensen, George A., Here Lies the Supreme Court: Revisited, Journal of Supreme Court History, Volume 33 Issue 1, Pages 17 – 41 (19 Feb 2008), University of Alabama.
  26. ^ a b "'Cardozo was first, but was he Hispanic?,' USA Today, May 27, 2009". May 27, 2009. Archived from the original on 2009-05-30. Retrieved 2009-06-02.
  27. ^ "Mark Sherman, 'First Hispanic Justice? Some Say It Was Cardozo,' Associated Press May 26, 2009". ABC News. Archived from the original on August 21, 2009. Retrieved 2009-06-02.
  28. ^ "Robert Schlesinger, Would Sotomayor be the First Hispanic Supreme Court Justice or Was it Cardozo? US News & World Report May 29, 2009". Archived from the original on May 29, 2009. Retrieved August 24, 2017.
  29. ^ a b "Neil A. Lewis, 'Was a Hispanic Justice on the Court in the '30s?,' The New York Times, May 26, 2009". The New York Times. May 27, 2009. Archived from the original on June 30, 2012. Retrieved April 26, 2010.
  30. from the original on 2020-07-27. Retrieved 2016-02-19.
  31. ^ "Law School Chapter Locator".
  32. ^ * * * Benjamin N. Cardozo Lodge Archived 2021-02-24 at the Wayback Machine at www.cardozospeaks.org

Further reading

External videos
video icon Presentation by Andrew L. Kaufman on Cardozo, June 14, 1998, C-SPAN

External links

Legal offices
Preceded by
Chief Judge of the New York Court of Appeals

1927–1932
Succeeded by
Preceded by Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
1932–1938
Succeeded by