Ecoimmunology
Ecoimmunology or Ecological Immunology is the study of the causes and consequences of variation in
mechanisms of immunology. This approach places immunology in evolutionary and ecological contexts across all levels of biological organization.Classical, or mainstream, immunology works hard to control variation (inbred/domestic model organisms, parasite-free environments, etc.) and asks questions about the mechanisms and functionality of the immune system using a reductionist method. While ecoimmunology originated from these fields, it is distinguished by its focus to explain natural variation in immune functions.[3]
Multiple institutes engage in ecoimmunological research, such as the Center for Immunity, Infection, and Evolution at the University of Edinburgh and the Max Planck Institute for Immunoecology and Migration. The US National Science Foundation has funded a Research Coordination Network to bring methodological and conceptual unity to the field of ecoimmunology. The causes and consequences of immune variation have larger implications for public health, conservation, wildlife management, and agriculture.[4]
History
Ecological Immunology is a discipline that uses ecological perspectives to understand variation in immune function. Specifically, to explain how abiotic and biotic factors influence the variation in immune function.
Seminal papers
Seminal papers in the field include Sheldon & Verhulst's [3] which proposed concepts from Life history theory, trade-offs and allocation of resources between competing costly physiological functions, are a cause of variation in immunity [5] One of the field's seminal papers, by Folstad and Karter,[7] was a response to Hamilton and Zuk's famous paper on the handicap hypothesis for sexually selected traits.[8] Folstad and Karter proposed the immunocompetence handicap hypothesis, whereby testosterone acts as a mediator of immunosuppression and thus keeps sexually-selected traits honest.[7] Although there is only moderate observational or experimental evidence supporting this claim up until now, the paper itself was one of the first links to be made suggesting a cost to immunity requiring trade-offs between it and other physiological processes.
More recently, ecoimmunology has been the theme of three special issues in peer-reviewed journals, in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, in Functional Ecology, and in Physiological and Biochemical Zoology (see External links).
Known factors that influence immune variation
Intraspecific constraints
Organisms allocate energy between competing processes including self-maintenance, reproduction, or growth.[9] Energy availability is limited, and the resources used for one of the competing metabolic tasks (i.e., growth, immune response) cannot be directed towards another.[10] The cost of immunity is central to the understanding of ecoimmunology. Natural selection should favor the optimal immune response that maximizes total lifetime reproductive output. The costs of immunity to parasites occur at the individual and the evolutionary scale.[1] Trade-offs between bodily demands are titrated in relation to the local and social ecology.[11]
Innate versus acquired
One axis on which these trade-offs occur is the trade-off between innate and acquired immunity. McDade applies a framework that considers three ecological factors that shape life-history trade-offs.[12] The framework suggests that environments with high extrinsic mortality should favor innate immunity or short-term immunity while low extrinsic mortality should allow for a longer time horizon in order to invest in acquired or long-term immunity.[12]
- The availability of nutritional resources
- The intensity of pathogen exposure
- Signals of extrinsic mortality risk
Childhood growth
Among organisms, in developmental stages, the allocation of energy toward immune function may trade-off with physical growth, particularly in environments characterized by high-pathogen and low resources.[13] In Tsimane children, a 49% reduction in growth was observed in children with mild immune activation.[14]
Body size
Body size affects the extent to which an organism is exposed to parasites as well as limitations on how organisms can mount an immune response.[4] A meta-analysis across animal taxa found that small animals, disproportionately long-lived for their size, experience the largest costs of immune activation.[15]
Reproduction
Physiological and behavioral changes during reproduction are known to influence the
Testosterone
The Immunocompetence Handicap Hypothesis and similar theories propose that testosterone mediates a trade-off between longevity and reproductive effort in males, prioritizing investment in secondary sexual characteristics such as sexually dimorphic muscle mass.[7][24] Energetically expensive secondary sexual characteristics, such as skeletal muscle mass, have been shown to predict a relationship between testosterone levels and reproductive effort.[25]
Human males experience muscle mass deterioration during times of immunological and nutritional stress.[24][25] In humans, studies have reported lower testosterone in males with acute illnesses, including sepsis, surgery[26] and HIV.[27]
A different theoretical model has been proposed for testosterone variability as phenotypic plasticity taking into account behavioral and environmental impacts as well as the role of immune activation on testosterone levels.[25] This model considers the variability we see as a plastic response to environmental stimuli and disease risk in different ecological environments, fundamental shifts between energetic allocations from reproductive to somatic efforts. Within this framework, lowered testosterone in response to injury or illness may be indicative of an adaptive response.[25]
Stress and cortisol
Stress through the release of stress hormones, such as glucocorticoids, influence immune function. Glucocorticoids, like cortisol stimulates mobilization of glucose when energetic demands are increased.[6] Psychological stress responses that trigger physiological changes in organisms in order to cope with the stress modulate immune responses.[28] Activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis is one of the main mechanisms by which the immune system interacts with stress.[29] In animal studies, stressors such as social disruption and restraint stress active HPA axis in mice[29] In both human and animal models, studies have shown that varying times of stress can reactivate latent HSV-1.[29] Stress have been shown to increase ocular shedding of HSV-1 shedding in mice [30] and nasal shedding in bovids.[31] In humans, stress is a predictor of recurrences of herpes simplex virus outbreaks [32] and Epstein-Barr virus.[33]
Interactions with parasites
Host feeding behavior
Parasite-altered feeding behaviors have been observed in several species.
Parasite manipulation
Selection is expected to favor parasite manipulation of the host when the host's behavior creates a suboptimal environment for the parasite's fitness.[40] An application of coevolutionary theory would predict sophisticated manipulations of host behavior when host-specificity is high.[40] Manipulation must be distinguished from disruption or dysfunction, as such experiments must demonstrate that parasite-altered behavior has fitness benefits for the parasite and that it is regulated or controlled physiologically by the parasite.[40]
Host resistance
Additional Interactions
Nutritional stress
The upregulation of the immune system incurs significant nutritional costs in the forms of protein and energy.[47] Immune costs are often seen when organisms are in stressful environments [48] such as experiencing nutritional stress. In animal models, fruit flies that were selected for parasitoid resistance showed reduced larval competitiveness only when they were subject to food limitations.[48][49]
Leptin has been proposed as a mediator of energetic trade-offs, as a potential provider of signal for current energy availability.[50]
Microbiome
Rapid changes in the gut microbiome occurred during human evolution[51] Because the microbiome is influenced by the host environment, researchers believe that it played a role in facilitating human adaptation to novel environments facilitated through periods of climate change and migration.[52] For instance, commensal microbes influence the host's ability to survive pathogenic exposures through several mechanisms including inter-microbial competition and interaction with the immune system.[52] In humans, the microbiome also contributes to many bodily functions such as nutrient processing and fat regulation.[48]
Seasonality
Seasonal changes in immunity arise in wildlife populations due to changes in disease threats over time and trade-offs between immune function and other seasonally variable investments such as reproductive efforts.[5] Examples of these costly reproductive efforts include molting, thermoregulation, and migration in birds.[5] Seasonal immunosuppression is seen during long days in summer among reptiles and birds.[16]
Temperature stress
Temperature stress has been causally linked to declines in immune function in several species including
Population genetics
Population genetic characteristics such as population size, mutation frequency, and selective processes are important host-parasite co-evolutionary dynamics and therefore influence the evolution of different aspects of the immune system.[48]
Pathogen stress is a major recent selection pressure in human evolution.
Studies have shown genes that are differently expressed based on genetic ancestry shape interindividual variation of immune cell responses to viral infections, but most of these effects are cell type-specific.[54] Segments of Neanderthal ancestry genomes introgressed to modern humans are enriched for proteins that interact with viruses suggestive of viral selection pressure throughout evolution.[56]
Critiques
Early studies in ecoimmunology tended to underestimate the complexities of parasite defenses, often relying on one or two immune metrics as an overall indication of anti-pathogen defense capabilities.[4] Many studies involve in vivo laboratory experiments, but there have been recent calls for immunologists to study immune variation more in wild animals in particular.[57] To date, sampling wild populations have shown there is substantial inter-individual immune variation.[6]
Another source of criticism comes from the need for to develop assays that can be utilized across species and be accessible in multiple laboratories due to the fact that ecoimmunologists primarily study non-model organisms.[6]
Evolutionary implications
Ecoimmunology allows for the incorporation of more realistic details of variation in individual immune responses in a population. New research has demonstrated that individual variation in infectiousness follows a highly
Models of host-pathogen coevolution have shown that the nature of life-history trade-offs can greatly alter the evolution of pathogen virulence and its ability to harm infected hosts.[59]
Recent advances in theoretical modeling have allowed for the increased integration of within-organism processes (such as immune-mediated reduction in pathogen replication) and between organism processes (such as
Medical implications
One of the most influential contributions of ecoimmunology has been the concept of tolerance which incorporates the cost of infection into measures of immunity. The study of
See also
References
- ^ PMID 24838746.
- ^ Downs C (June 2014). "A primer in ecoimmunology and immunology for wildlife research and management". California Fish and Game. 100: 371–395.
- ^ PMID 21237861.
- ^ PMC 7114998.
- ^ S2CID 84050611.
- ^ PMID 25218837.
- ^ S2CID 85266542.
- PMID 7123238.
- PMID 12295622.
- ISSN 0084-6570.
- PMID 14666535.
- ^ PMID 26739325.
- ISSN 0269-8463.
- PMID 29632170.
- PMID 29356459.
- ^ PMID 21665817.
- S2CID 14365109.
- ^ PMID 21672808.
- PMID 31165474.
- ISSN 1045-2249.
- PMID 29483573.
- ^ S2CID 209586422.
- PMID 22101690.
- ^ PMID 11786994.
- ^ S2CID 25730983.
- PMID 8501163.
- PMID 7616856.
- PMID 12909458.
- ^ PMID 18279846.
- PMID 9618568.
- S2CID 206331639.
- PMID 10665891.
- S2CID 25629238.
- PMID 33326432.
- PMID 9628035.
- S2CID 8060013.
- JSTOR 2265536.
- .
- ^ PMID 16618675.
- ^ S2CID 41579370.
- ^ PMID 22479650.
- S2CID 85326514.
- S2CID 13296284.
- S2CID 26061375.
- S2CID 25322910.
- S2CID 7052797.
- ISSN 0030-1299.
- ^ PMID 18926970.
- S2CID 205026562.
- PMID 21940777.
- PMID 25368157.
- ^ S2CID 202581640.
- PMID 26889214.
- ^ PMID 34822289.
- ^ PMID 22072984.
- PMID 30290142.
- S2CID 9692150.
- ^ PMID 24944113.
- S2CID 24108279.
- PMID 19911046.
- S2CID 24758375.
- PMID 24465177.
- PMID 27016341.
- PMID 28207349.
External links
- NSF Research Collaborative Network: Refining and Diversifying Ecological Immunology
- Wild Immunology, University of Edinburgh
- Ecological Immunology Theme Issue of Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society B Table of Contents
- Special issue: Ecological Immunology, Functional Ecology Table of Contents
- Physiological and Biochemical Zoology Jan/Feb 2019 Special Issue on Ecoimmunology Table of Contents