Second Crusade
- العربية
- Aragonés
- Արեւմտահայերէն
- Asturianu
- Azərbaycanca
- تۆرکجه
- বাংলা
- Беларуская
- Български
- Bosanski
- Brezhoneg
- Català
- Čeština
- Deutsch
- Eesti
- Ελληνικά
- Español
- Euskara
- فارسی
- Français
- Gaeilge
- Galego
- 한국어
- Հայերեն
- Hrvatski
- Bahasa Indonesia
- Italiano
- עברית
- Jawa
- ქართული
- Kurdî
- Latina
- Latviešu
- Lietuvių
- Lombard
- Magyar
- Македонски
- Malagasy
- Malti
- مصرى
- Bahasa Melayu
- Nederlands
- 日本語
- Norsk bokmål
- Norsk nynorsk
- Occitan
- Oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча
- پنجابی
- پښتو
- Polski
- Português
- Română
- Русский
- Shqip
- Sicilianu
- සිංහල
- Slovenčina
- Slovenščina
- Српски / srpski
- Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски
- Suomi
- Svenska
- Tagalog
- ไทย
- Türkçe
- Українська
- اردو
- Tiếng Việt
- Walon
- 吴语
- 中文
Second Crusade | |
---|---|
Part of the | |
Result | See § Aftermath |
Territorial changes |
- Seljuk Empire
- Fatimid Caliphate
- Almoravids
- Baldwin III of Jerusalem
- Raymond II of Tripoli
- Raymond of Poitiers †
- Louis VII of France
- Eleanor of Aquitaine
- Alfonso Jordan
- Theodwin
- Conrad III of Germany
- Ottokar III of Styria
- Manuel Komnenos
- Thierry of Alsace
- Joscelin II, Count of Edessa
- Roger II of Sicily
- Afonso I of Portugal
- Alfonso VII of León and Castile
- Ramon Berenguer IV
Ideology and institutions
In the Holy Land (1095–1291)
Northern (1147–1410) Against Christians (1204–1588)
Popular (1096–1320) Reconquista (722–1492) | |
Period post-Second Crusade
Period post-Third Crusade Sixth Crusade and aftermath |
The Second Crusade (1147–1149) was the second major
The Second Crusade was announced by
The initial response to the new
Background
Fall of Edessa
Meanwhile,
In late 1144, Joscelin II allied with the Artuqids and marched out of
Papal bull and French plans
The news of the fall of Edessa was brought back to Europe first by pilgrims early in 1145, and then by embassies from Antioch, Jerusalem and Armenia. Bishop Hugh of Jabala reported the news to Pope Eugene III, who issued the bull Quantum praedecessores on 1 December, calling for a second crusade.[7] Hugh also told the Pope of an eastern Christian king, who, it was hoped, would bring relief to the crusader states: this is the first documented mention of Prester John.[8] Eugene did not control Rome and lived instead at Viterbo,[9] but nevertheless the Second Crusade was meant to be more organized and centrally controlled than the First: the armies would be led by the strongest kings of Europe and a route would be planned.[10]
Saint Bernard of Clairvaux

The Pope commissioned French abbot
For all his overmastering zeal, Bernard was by nature neither a bigot nor a persecutor. As in the First Crusade, the preaching inadvertently led to attacks on Jews; a fanatical French monk named
Reconquista in Iberia

In the spring of 1147, the Pope authorized the expansion of the crusade into the
The crusaders agreed to help the king attack Lisbon, with a solemn agreement that offered to them the pillage of the city's goods and the ransom money for expected prisoners. However, some of the crusader forces were hesitant to help, remembering a previous failed attempt on the city by a combined force of Portuguese and northern crusaders during the earlier siege of Lisbon in 1142.[15] The 1147 siege of Lisbon lasted from 1 July to 25 October, when the Moorish rulers agreed to surrender primarily due to hunger within the city. Most of the crusaders settled in the newly captured city, but some of them set sail and continued to the Holy Land.[14] Some of them, who had departed earlier, helped capture Santarém earlier in the same year. Later they also helped to conquer Sintra, Almada, Palmela and Setúbal, and they were allowed to stay in the conquered lands, where they settled down and had offspring.
Almost at the same time on the peninsula, King
Ramon Berenguer then invaded the lands of the
Forces
Muslims
The professional soldiers of the Muslim states, who were usually ethnic
The principal Islamic commander was Mu'in ad-Din Unur, the atabeg of Damascus from 1138 to 1149. Damascus was supposedly ruled by the Burid dynasty of Damascus, but Anur, who commanded the military, was the real ruler of the city. The historian David Nicolle described Anur as an able general and diplomat, also well known as a patron of the arts. Because the Burid dynasty was displaced in 1154 by the Zengid dynasty, Anur's role in repulsing the Second Crusade has been largely erased with historians and chroniclers loyal to the Zengids giving the credit to Anur's rival, Nur al-Din Zengi, the emir of Aleppo.[20]
Crusaders
The German contingent comprised about 20,000 knights; the French contingent had about 700 knights from the king's lands while the nobility raised smaller numbers of knights; and the Kingdom of Jerusalem had about 950 knights and 6,000 infantrymen.[21]
The French knights preferred to fight on horseback, while the German knights liked to fight on foot. The Byzantine Greek chronicler John Kinnamos wrote "the French are particularly capable of riding horseback in good order and attacking with the spear, and their cavalry surpasses that of the Germans in speed. The Germans, however, are able to fight on foot better than the French and excel in using the great sword."[22]
Conrad III was considered to be a brave knight, though often described as indecisive in moments of crisis.[23] Louis VII was a devout Christian with a sensitive side who was often attacked by contemporaries like Bernard of Clairvaux for being more in love with his wife Eleanor than he was interested in war or politics.[24]
Stephen, King of England did not participate in the second crusade due to internal conflicts in his kingdom.[25] Meanwhile, King David I of Scotland was dissuaded by his subjects from joining the crusade himself.[26]
In the East
Joscelin II retook the town of Edessa and
German route
The German crusaders, accompanied by the
In Anatolia, Conrad decided not to wait for the French, but marched towards
In battle, the Turks used their typical tactic of pretending to retreat, and then returning to attack the small force of German cavalry which had separated from the main army to chase them. Conrad began a slow retreat back to Constantinople, his army harassed daily by the Turks, who attacked stragglers and defeated the rearguard.[33] Conrad himself was wounded in a skirmish with them. The other division of the German force, led by the King's half-brother, Bishop Otto of Freising, had marched south to the Mediterranean coast and was similarly defeated early in 1148.[34] The force led by Otto ran out of food while crossing inhospitable countryside and was ambushed by the Seljuks near Laodicea on 16 November 1147. The majority of Otto's force were either killed in battle or captured and sold into slavery.[31]
French route

The French crusaders had departed from
Since the original negotiations between Louis and Manuel I, Manuel had broken off his military campaign against Rûm, signing a truce with his enemy Sultan Mesud I. Manuel did this to give himself a free hand to concentrate on defending his empire from the crusaders, who had gained a reputation for theft and treachery since the First Crusade and were widely suspected of harbouring sinister designs on Constantinople. Nevertheless, Manuel's relations with the French army were somewhat better than with the Germans, and Louis was entertained lavishly in Constantinople. Some of the French were outraged by Manuel's truce with the Seljuks and called for an alliance with Roger II and an attack on Constantinople, but Louis restrained them.[36]

When the armies from Savoy,
The French met the remnants of Conrad's army at
They reached
Journey to Jerusalem
Though delayed by storms, Louis eventually arrived in Antioch on 19 March; Amadeus of Savoy had died in Cyprus along the way. Louis was welcomed by Eleanor's uncle Raymond of Poitiers.
Raymond expected him to help defend against the Turks and to accompany him on an expedition against Aleppo, the Muslim city that functioned as the gateway to Edessa, but Louis refused, preferring instead to finish his pilgrimage to Jerusalem rather than focus on the military aspect of the crusade.[41]
Eleanor enjoyed her stay, but her uncle implored her to remain to enlarge family lands and divorce Louis if the king refused to help what was assuredly the military cause of the Crusade.[42] During this period, there were rumours of an affair between Raymond and Eleanor, which caused tensions in the marriage between Louis and Eleanor.[43]
Louis quickly left Antioch for
Alfonso himself did not reach Jerusalem; he died at
In response to the arrival of the crusaders, the regent of Damascus, Mu'in ad-Din Unur, started making feverish preparations for war, strengthening the fortifications of Damascus, ordering troops to his city and having the water sources along the road to Damascus destroyed or diverted. Unur sought help from the Zangid rulers of Aleppo and Mosul (who were normally his rivals), though forces from these states did not arrive in time to see combat outside of Damascus. It is almost certain that the Zangid rulers delayed sending troops to Damascus out of the hope that their rival Unur might lose his city to the crusaders.[45]
Council of Palmarea
The nobility of Jerusalem welcomed the arrival of troops from Europe. A council to decide on the best target for the crusaders took place on 24 June 1148, when the
In the end, the decision was made to attack the city of Damascus, a former ally of the Kingdom of Jerusalem that had shifted its allegiance to that of the Zengids, and attacked the Kingdom's allied city of
Siege of Damascus

The crusaders decided to attack Damascus from the west, where orchards would provide them with a constant food supply.[32] They arrived at Darayya on 23 July. The following day, the Muslims were prepared for the attack and constantly attacked the army advancing through the orchards outside Damascus. The defenders had sought help from Sayf al-Din Ghazi I of Mosul and Nur ad-Din of Aleppo, who personally led an attack on the crusader camp. The crusaders were pushed back from the walls into the orchards, leaving them exposed to ambushes and guerrilla attacks.[41]
According to William of Tyre, on 27 July the crusaders decided to move to the plain on the eastern side of the city, which was less heavily fortified but had much less food and water.[32] It was recorded by some that Unur had bribed the leaders to move to a less defensible position, and that Unur had promised to break off his alliance with Nur ad-Din if the crusaders went home.[41] Meanwhile, Nur ad-Din and Sayf al-Din had arrived. With Nur ad-Din in the field it was impossible for the crusaders to return to their better position.[41] The local crusader lords refused to carry on with the siege, and the three kings had no choice but to abandon the city.[32] First Conrad, then the rest of the army, decided to retreat to Jerusalem on 28 July, though for their entire retreat they were followed by Turkish archers who constantly harassed them.[50]
Aftermath
The crusaders were victorious in the west, where they conquered several territories—including Lisbon, which would later became the capital of Portugal and thus the Portuguese Empire.[51]
In the east, each of the Christian forces felt betrayed by the other.[32] A new plan was made to attack Ascalon and Conrad took his troops there, but no further help arrived, due to the lack of trust that had resulted from the failed siege. This mutual distrust would linger for a generation due to the defeat, to the ruin of the Christian kingdoms in the Holy Land. After quitting Ascalon, Conrad returned to Constantinople to further his alliance with Manuel. Louis remained behind in Jerusalem until 1149. The discord also extended to the marriage of Louis and Eleanor, which had been falling apart during the course of the Crusade. In April 1149, Louis and Eleanor, who were barely on speaking terms by this time, pointedly boarded separate ships to take them back to France.[52]
Back in Europe, Bernard of Clairvaux was humiliated by the defeat. Bernard considered it his duty to send an apology to the Pope and it is inserted in the second part of his Book of Consideration. There, he explains how the sins of the crusaders were the cause of their misfortune and failures. When his attempt to call a new crusade failed, he tried to disassociate himself from the fiasco of the Second Crusade altogether.[53] He would die in 1153.[53]
The cultural impact of the Second Crusade was even greater in France, with many troubadours fascinated by the alleged affair between Eleanor and Raymond, which helped to feed the theme of courtly love. Unlike Conrad, the image of Louis was improved by the Crusade with many of the French seeing him as a suffering pilgrim king who quietly bore God's punishments.[54]
Relations between the Eastern Roman Empire and the French were badly damaged by the Crusade. Louis and other French leaders openly accused the Emperor Manuel I of colluding with Turkish attacks on them during the march across Anatolia. The memory of the Second Crusade was to colour French views of the Byzantines for the rest of the 12th and 13th centuries. Within the empire itself, the crusade was remembered as a triumph of diplomacy.[55] In the eulogy for the Emperor Manuel by Archbishop Eustathius of Thessalonica, it was declared, "He was able to deal with his enemies with enviable skill, playing off one against the other with the aim of bringing peace and tranquility".[55]
In the East the situation was much darker for the Christians. In the Holy Land, the Second Crusade had disastrous long-term consequences for Jerusalem. In 1149, the atabeg Anur died, at which point Abu Sa'id Mujir al-Din Abaq Ibn Muhammad began to rule as emir. The ra'is of Damascus and commander of the ahdath military Mu'ayad al-Dawhal Ibn al-Sufi feel that since his ahdath had played a major role in defeating the Second Crusade that he deserved a greater share of the power, and within two months of Anur's death was leading a rebellion against Abaq. The in-fighting within Damascus was to lead to the end of the Burid state within five years. Damascus no longer trusted the crusader kingdom and was taken by Nur ad-Din after a short siege in 1154.[56]
Baldwin III finally
Notes
- ^ a b Tyerman 2006, pp. 275–281.
- ^ Riley-Smith 2005, pp. 50–53.
- ^ a b Tyerman 2006, pp. 185–189.
- ^ Runciman 1952, pp. 227–228.
- ^ Ousâma ibn Mounkidh, un émir syrien au premier siècle des croisades, p. 182 (in BnF)
- ^ Runciman 1952, pp. 225–244.
- ^ Tyerman 2006, pp. 273–275.
- ^ Runciman 1952, p. 247.
- ^ Tyerman 2006, p. 289.
- ^ Tyerman 2006, p. 298.
- ^ Father Marie Gildas (1907). "St. Bernard of Clairvaux". In Catholic Encyclopedia. 2. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
- ^ a b c Riley-Smith 1991, p. 48.
- ^ Tyerman 2006, pp. 281–288.
- ^ a b Runciman 1952, p. 258.
- ^ Villegas-Aristizábal 2013, pp. 7–20.
- ^ Villegas-Aristizábal 2009, pp. 80–97.
- ^ Riley-Smith 1991, p. 126.
- JSTOR 871101.
- ^ Nicolle 2009, pp. 28–30.
- ^ Nicolle 2009, pp. 19–21.
- ^ Nicolle 2009, p. 24.
- ^ Nicolle 2009, pp. 26–27.
- ^ Nicolle 2009, p. 17.
- ^ Nicolle 2009, p. 18.
- ^ Schmieder & O'Doherty 2015, pp. 121–138.
- ^ Cowan, Mackay & Macquarrie 1983, p. 18.
- ^ Runciman 1952, pp. 257, 259.
- ^ Nicolle 2009, p. 42.
- ^ Runciman 1952, pp. 259–267.
- ^ Nicolle 2009, p. 43.
- ^ a b c Nicolle 2009, p. 46.
- ^ a b c d e f g Riley-Smith 1991, p. 50.
- ^ Nicolle 2009, p. 47.
- ^ Runciman 1952, pp. 267–270.
- ^ Runciman 1952, pp. 259–263.
- ^ Runciman 1952, pp. 268–269.
- ^ Runciman 1952, p. 269.
- ^ Runciman 1952, pp. 270–271.
- ^ Riley-Smith 1991, p. 51.
- ^ Runciman 1952, pp. 272–273.
- ^ a b c d e Brundage 1962, pp. 115–121.
- ^ a b Nicolle 2009, p. 54.
- ^ Nicolle 2009, pp. 18, 54.
- ^ Riley-Smith 1991, pp. 49–50.
- ^ Nicolle 2009, p. 55.
- ^ William of Tyre, Babcock & Krey 1943, vol. 2, bk. 17, ch. 1, pp. 184–185: "it seems well worth while and quite in harmony with the present history that the names of the nobles who were present at the council... should be recorded here for the benefit of posterity ... to name each one individually would take far too long.".
- ^ Nicolle 2009, pp. 54–55.
- ^ Nicolle 2009, pp. 37–38.
- ^ Runciman 1952, pp. 228–229.
- ^ Baldwin & Setton 1969, p. 510.
- ^ Baldwin & Setton 1969, p. 466.
- ^ Nicolle 2009, p. 77.
- ^ a b Runciman 1952, pp. 232–234, 277.
- ^ Nicolle 2009, pp. 81–84.
- ^ a b Nicolle 2009, p. 84.
- ^ Nicolle 2009, pp. 78, 81.
- ^ Riley-Smith 1991, p. 56.
- ^ Riley-Smith 1991, p. 60.
References
- Baldwin, Marshall W.; Setton, Kenneth M. (1969). A History of the Crusades, Volume I: The First Hundred Years. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
- ISBN 978-0-393-30153-3.
- Berry, Virginia G. (1969). The Second Crusade (PDF). Chapter XV, A History of the Crusades, Volume I.
- Brundage, James (1962). The Crusades: A Documentary History. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.
- Christiansen, Eric (1997). The Northern Crusades. London: Penguin. p. 287. ISBN 978-0-14-026653-5.
- Cowan, Ian Borthwick; Mackay, P. H. R.; Macquarrie, Alan (1983). The Knights of St John of Jerusalem in Scotland. Vol. 19. Scottish History Society. ISBN 978-0-906245-03-3.
- ISBN 978-0-06-097468-8.
- Herrmann, Joachim (1970). Die Slawen in Deutschland. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. p. 530.
- Magdalino, Paul (1993). The Empire of Manuel I Komnenos, 1143–1180. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-52653-1.
- ISBN 978-1-84603-354-4.
- ISBN 978-0-670-82377-2.
- Riley-Smith, Jonathan (1991). Atlas of the Crusades. New York: Facts on File.
- Riley-Smith, Jonathan (2005). The Crusades: A Short History (Second ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-10128-7.
- )
- Schmieder, Felicitas; O'Doherty, Marianne (2015). Travels and Mobilities in the Middle Ages: From the Atlantic to the Black Sea. Vol. 21. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols Publishers. ISBN 978-2-503-55449-5.
- ISBN 978-0-674-02387-1.
- Villegas-Aristizábal, Lucas (2016) [2009]. Crusades. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-315-27159-0.
- Villegas-Aristizábal, Lucas (2013). "Revisiting the Anglo-Norman Crusaders' Failed Attempt to Conquer Lisbon c. 1142". Portuguese Studies. 29 (1). .
- OCLC 310995.
Further reading
Primary sources
- Osbernus. De expugniatione Lyxbonensi. The Conquest of Lisbon. Edited and translated by Charles Wendell David. Columbia University Press, 1936.
- Odo of Deuil. De profectione Ludovici VII in orientem. Edited and translated by Virginia Gingerick Berry. Columbia University Press, 1948.
- Otto of Freising. Gesta Friderici I Imperatoris. The Deeds of Frederick Barbarossa. Edited and translated by Charles Christopher Mierow. Columbia University Press, 1953.
- The Damascus Chronicle of the Crusaders, extracted and translated from the Chronicle of Ibn al-Qalanisi. Edited and translated by H. A. R. Gibb. London, 1932.
- O City of Byzantium, Annals of Niketas Choniatēs, trans. Harry J. Magoulias. Wayne State University Press, 1984.
- John Cinnamus, Deeds of John and Manuel Comnenus, trans. Charles M. Brand. Columbia University Press, 1976.
Secondary sources
- ISBN 0-299-04834-9.
- Ferzoco, George. "The Origin of the Second Crusade". In Gervers (see below), and available online.
- Gervers, Michael, ed. The Second Crusade and the Cistercians. St. Martin's Press, 1992.
- Harris, Jonathan (2014). Byzantium and The Crusades. Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-1-78093-767-0.
- Phillips, Jonathan, and Martin Hoch, eds. The Second Crusade: Scope and Consequences. Manchester University Press, 2001.
- Phillips, Jonathan (2007). The Second Crusade: Extending the Frontiers of Christendom. Yale University Press.
External links
- The Second Crusade and Aftermath at the Internet Medieval Sourcebook