WAIFW matrix
In
Examples
The WAIFW matrix for two groups is expressed as where is the transmission coefficient from an infected member of group and a susceptible member of group . Usually specific mixing patterns are assumed.[citation needed]
Assortative mixing
Assortative mixing occurs when those with certain characteristics are more likely to mix with others with whom they share those characteristics. It could be given by [2] or the general WAIFW matrix so long as . Disassortative mixing is instead when .
Homogenous mixing
Homogenous mixing, which is also dubbed random mixing, is given by .[3] Transmission is assumed equally likely regardless of group characteristics when a homogenous mixing WAIFW matrix is used. Whereas for heterogenous mixing, transmission rates depend on group characteristics.
Asymmetric mixing
It need not be the case that . Examples of asymmetric WAIFW matrices are[4]
Social contact hypothesis
The social contact hypothesis was proposed by Jacco Wallinga , Peter Teunis, and Mirjam Kretzschmar in 2006. The hypothesis states that transmission rates are proportional to contact rates, and allows for social contact data to be used in place of WAIFW matrices.[5]
See also
- Mathematical modelling of infectious disease
- Next-generation matrix
References
- ISBN 978-1-4008-4103-5.
- ^ ISBN 978-1-4614-4071-0.
- S2CID 15947480
- ISBN 978-0-19-856-576-5
- PMID 16968863