Deliberative Council of Princes and Ministers
The Deliberative Council of Princes and Ministers (traditional Chinese: 議政王大臣會議; simplified Chinese: 议政王大臣会议; pinyin: Yìzhèng Wáng Dàchén Huìyì), also known as the Council of Princes and High Officials and Assembly of Princes and High Officials, or simply as the Deliberative Council (traditional Chinese: 議政處; simplified Chinese: 议政处; pinyin: Yìzhèng Chù; Manchu: ᡥᡝᠪᡝ ᡳ
ᠪᠠ, Möllendorff: hebe-i ba), was an advisory body for the emperors of the early Qing dynasty (1644–1912). Derived from informal deliberative groups created by Nurhaci (1559–1626) in the 1610s and early 1620s, the Council was formally established by his son and successor Hong Taiji (1592–1643) in 1626 and expanded in 1637. Staffed mainly by Manchu dignitaries, this aristocratic institution served as the chief source of advice on military matters for Hong Taiji and the Shunzhi (r. 1643–1661) and Kangxi (r. 1661–1722) emperors.[1] It was particularly powerful during the regencies of Dorgon (1643–1650) and Oboi (1661–1669), who used it to enhance their personal influence.[2]
After serving as the most influential policymaking body of the dynasty for more than a century, the Deliberative Council was displaced and then made obsolete by the more ethnically mixed Grand Council, which the Yongzheng Emperor (r. 1722–1735) created in the late 1720s to circumvent the influence of the deliberative princes and ministers. The Deliberative Council was formally abolished in 1792.
Origins and formal establishment
Historian Robert Oxnam has called the origin of the Council "a complicated and often confusing process."[3] The Council originated in informal institutions created by Nurhaci (1559–1626) to promote collegial rule among his sons. In 1601, Nurhaci had organized Manchu society into four "Banners" that were doubled in number in 1615 to become the Eight Banners.[4] In 1622, he gave eight of his sons (who were called "princes," or beile) control over one banner each[4] and ordered them to meet to deliberate major policies, especially military matters.[5] Nurhaci's eight sons were known collectively as the "princes who deliberate on government" (議政王 yìzhèng wáng; Manchu: doro jafaha beise).[6]
Another precursor to the Council was a group of "five high officials" and "ten judges" (jarguci), all Manchu, that Nurhaci put in charge of administrative and judicial tasks in 1615 or 1616.[7] Robert Oxnam claims that this group was then referred to as "high officials who deliberate on government" (議政大臣 yìzhèng dàchén; Manchu: hebe-i amban) and assisted the princes in discussing policy.[8] Franz Michael, however, claims that they were mere "technical advisors", a point of view supported by Silas Wu.[9] In 1623, "eight high officials" were also made deliberative officials, but their functions were chiefly censorial and their primary role was to let Nurhaci know of conspiracies among the princes.[10]
Nurhaci was succeeded by his son Hong Taiji (r. 1626–1643), who, instead of following his father's wish for collegial rule, became a strong ruler who laid the institutional foundation of the Qing dynasty. In 1627 he placed the Eight Banners under the command of eight "high officials" (Ma.: gusai ejen; Ch.: dachen), who were also told to assist the princes in policy deliberations.[11] Silas Wu identifies this reform as the bona fide origin of the Deliberative Council, which then became Hong Taiji's main policymaking structure and was consulted on foreign and military matters.[12] In 1637, one year after he had declared himself emperor of the Qing dynasty, Hong Taiji officially excluded imperial princes from the Council.[13] Instead, the Council was manned by eight lieutenant-generals (later called dutong 都統 in Chinese) with two deputies (fu dutong 副都統) each, who were put in charge of managing the Eight Manchu Banners.[14] By limiting Council membership to Manchu military leaders from outside the imperial clan, Hung Taiji enhanced his personal power at the expense of the other princes.[2] Nonetheless the Council remained a bastion of "collective aristocratic rule" within the Qing government.[15]
Central role in the early Qing
When Hong Taiji died in 1643, he was replaced by the young
After Dorgon's death on the last day of 1650, the Shunzhi Emperor started his personal rule: he ordered the members of the Council to
The Shunzhi Emperor (r. 1643–1661) was succeeded by
The
Replacement by the Grand Council
The Yongzheng Emperor succeeded the Kangxi Emperor after a crisis that pitted many of the Kangxi Emperor's sons against one another. Many Manchu nobles who had sided with the Yongzheng Emperor's rivals during the succession struggle were still members of the Deliberative Council.[29] To avoid alienating these grandees, the Yongzheng Emperor still made new appointments to the Council and consulted it on various military matters, but he also worked to undermine its power.[30] To bypass the Council, he created smaller parallel bodies which he found more reliable and less entrenched.[29] Slowly, he transferred deliberative powers to these more trusted ministers.[31] Around 1730, these informal institutions crystallized into the Grand Council.[29] Unlike the Deliberative Council, whose membership was almost exclusively Manchu, the Grand Council counted many Chinese among its ranks.[32] This more ethnically mixed privy council served as the empire's main policymaking body for the rest of the Qing dynasty.
After the stabilization of the Grand Council in the 1730s, the influence of the Deliberative Council quickly declined.
Notes
- ^ Wakeman 1985, p. 851; Bartlett 1991, p. 267; Hucker 1985, p. 266; Rawski 1998, p. 123.
- ^ a b Oxnam 1975, p. 31.
- ^ Oxnam 1975, p. 21, note 17.
- ^ a b Wu 1970, p. 10.
- ^ Oxnam 1975, p. 21; Bartlett 1991, p. 25.
- ^ Oxnam 1975, p. 21.
- ^ Oxnam 1975, p. 21 (1615); Wu 1970, p. 11 (1616); Michael 1942, p. 67 (1616).
- ^ Oxnam 1975, pp. 21 and 30 respectively.
- ^ Michael 1942, p. 67; Wu 1970, p. 11.
- ^ Wu 1970, p. 10; Wakeman 1985, p. 850.
- ^ Oxnam 1975, pp. 30 and 31, note 38; Wakeman 1985, pp. 850–851.
- ^ Wu 1970, p. 11; Oxnam 1975, p. 30 (main policymaking body); Wakeman 1985.
- ^ Wu 1970, p. 10; Oxnam 1975, p. 30.
- ^ Oxnam 1975, p. 30; Kessler 1976, p. 11.
- ^ Wakeman 1985, p. 851.
- ^ a b Oxnam 1975, p. 43.
- ^ a b Wakeman 1985, p. 885.
- ^ Wakeman 1985, p. 300, note 231
- ^ Wakeman 1985, p. 896.
- ^ Oxnam 1975, pp. 70–71.
- ^ a b c d e f g Oxnam 1975, p. 71.
- ^ a b Oxnam 1975, p. 70.
- ^ Wakeman 1985, pp. 925, 948, and 985 (for three examples).
- ^ Oxnam 1975, p. 69.
- ^ Oxnam 1975, pp. 71 and 74.
- ^ Oxnam 1975, pp. 72 and 199.
- ^ Perdue 2005, pp. 148 and 159.
- ^ Oxnam 1975, p. 74 (usually followed the council's advice); Wu 1970, p. 18 (rest of the information).
- ^ a b c Bartlett 1991, p. 27.
- ^ Bartlett 1991, p. 48 and p. 307, note 46.
- ^ a b Wu 1970, p. 105.
- ^ Oxnam 1975, p. 89 (Manchu membership); Bartlett 1991, p. 267 (open to Chinese).
- ^ Bartlett 1991, p. 308, note 61 (Manchu Grand secretaries, 1792), and p. 312, note 116 (abolition by Qianlong).
- ^ Bartlett 1991, p. 312, note 116, and p. 350, note 23.
Bibliography
- Bartlett, Beatrice S. (1991), Monarchs and Ministers: The Grand Council in Mid-Ch'ing China, 1723–1820, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-08645-6.
- ISBN 978-0-8047-1193-7.
- Kessler, Lawrence (1976), K'ang-Hsi and the Consolidation of Ch'ing Rule, 1661–1684, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, ISBN 978-0-226-43203-8.
- Michael, Franz (1942), The Origin of Manchu Rule in China: Frontier and Bureaucracy as Interacting Forces in the Chinese Empire, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
- ISBN 978-0-226-64244-4.
- ISBN 0-674-01684-X.
- Rawski, Evelyn S. (1998), The Last Emperors: A Social History of Qing Imperial Institutions, Los Angeles and Berkeley: University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-674-12761-6.
- Wu, Silas H. L. (1970), Communication and Imperial Control in China: Evolution of the Palace Memorial System, 1693–1735, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, ISBN 978-0-674-14801-7.
- ISBN 978-0-520-04804-1.