Field-reversed configuration

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Field-reversed configuration: a toroidal electric current is induced inside a cylindrical plasma, making a poloidal magnetic field, reversed in respect to the direction of an externally applied magnetic field. The resultant high-beta axisymmetric compact toroid is self-confined.

A field-reversed configuration (FRC) is a type of plasma device studied as a means of producing nuclear fusion. It confines a plasma on closed magnetic field lines without a central penetration.[1][2] In an FRC, the plasma has the form of a self-stable torus, similar to a smoke ring.

FRCs are closely related to another self-stable magnetic confinement fusion device, the spheromak. Both are considered part of the compact toroid class of fusion devices. FRCs normally have a plasma that is more elongated than spheromaks, having the overall shape of a hollowed out sausage rather than the roughly spherical spheromak.

FRCs were a major area of research in the 1960s and into the 1970s, but had problems scaling up into practical

fusion triple products (target combinations of density, temperature and confinement time). Interest returned in the 1990s and as of 2019
, FRCs were an active research area.

History

The FRC was first observed in laboratories in the late 1950s during theta pinch experiments with a reversed background magnetic field.[3] The original idea was attributed to the Greek scientist and engineer Nicholas C. Christofilos who developed the concept of E-layers for the Astron fusion reactor.[4]

The first studies were at the United States Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) in the 1960s. Considerable data were collected, with over 600 published papers.[5] Almost all research was conducted during Project Sherwood at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) from 1975 to 1990,[6] and during 18 years at the Redmond Plasma Physics Laboratory of the University of Washington,[7] with the large s experiment (LSX).[8]

Later research was at the

University of Wisconsin-Madison,[10] Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory,[11] and the University of California, Irvine.[12]

Private companies now study FRCs for electricity generation, including General Fusion, TAE Technologies, and Helion Energy.[13]

The Electrodeless Lorentz Force Thruster (ELF) developed by MSNW was an attempt to design a space propulsion device.

VASIMR[15]
before MSNW dissolved.

Applications

The primary application is for fusion power generation.

The FRC is also considered for

electrically powered spaceships and fusion rockets, with interest expressed by NASA.[16][17][18][19][20]

Comparisons

The Difference Between an FRC and a Spheromak
Main article: Magnetic confinement fusion

Producing fusion power by confining the plasma with magnetic fields is most effective if the field lines do not penetrate solid surfaces but close on themselves into circles or toroidal surfaces. The mainline confinement concepts of tokamak and stellarator do this in a toroidal chamber, which allows a great deal of control over the magnetic configuration, but requires a very complex construction. The field-reversed configuration offers an alternative in that the field lines are closed, providing good confinement, but the chamber is cylindrical, allowing simpler, easier construction and maintenance.[21]

Field-reversed configurations and

high beta. The high beta makes the FRC attractive as a fusion reactor and well-suited to aneutronic fuels because of the low required magnetic field. Spheromaks have β ≈ 0.1 whereas a typical FRC has β ≈ 1.[23][24]

Formation

The Dimensions of an FRC, including the S-parameter.

In modern FRC experiments, the plasma current that reverses the magnetic field can be induced in a variety of ways.

When a field-reversed configuration is formed using the theta-pinch (or inductive electric field) method, a cylindrical coil first produces an axial magnetic field. Then the gas is pre-ionized, which "freezes in" the bias field from a magnetohydrodynamic standpoint, finally the axial field is reversed, hence "field-reversed configuration." At the ends, reconnection of the bias field and the main field occurs, producing closed field lines. The main field is raised further, compressing and heating the plasma and providing a vacuum field between the plasma and the wall.[25]

Neutral beams are known to drive current in Tokamaks[26] by directly injecting charged particles. FRCs can also be formed, sustained, and heated by application of neutral beams.[24][27] In such experiments, as above, a cylindrical coil produces a uniform axial magnetic field and gas is introduced and ionized, creating a background plasma. Neutral particles are then injected into the plasma. They ionize and the heavier, positively-charged particles form a current ring which reverses the magnetic field.

Spheromaks are FRC-like configurations with finite toroidal magnetic field. FRCs have been formed through the merging of spheromaks of opposite and canceling toroidal field.[28]

Rotating magnetic fields have also been used to drive current.[29] In such experiments, as above, gas is ionized and an axial magnetic field is produced. A rotating magnetic field is produced by external magnetic coils perpendicular to the axis of the machine, and the direction of this field is rotated about the axis. When the rotation frequency is between the ion and electron gyro-frequencies, the electrons in the plasma co-rotate with the magnetic field (are "dragged"), producing current and reversing the magnetic field. More recently, so-called odd parity rotating magnetic fields[30][31] have been used to preserve the closed topology of the FRC. It was analytically shown that the at a very high critical threshold magnitude of 'odd parity' rotating magnetic field, the axisymmetric equilibrium magnetic field lines loses closure and fundamentally changes field topology. [31]

Single particle orbits

FRC particle trajectory in which a particle starts with cyclotron motion inside the null, transitions to betatron motion, and ends as cyclotron motion outside the null. This motion is in the midplane of the machine. Coils are above and below the figure.

FRCs contain an important and uncommon feature: a "magnetic null," or circular line on which the magnetic field is zero. This is necessarily the case, as inside the null the magnetic field points one direction and outside the null the magnetic field points the opposite direction. Particles far from the null trace closed cyclotron orbits as in other magnetic fusion geometries. Particles which cross the null, however, trace not cyclotron or circular orbits but betatron or figure-eight-like orbits,[32] as the orbit's curvature changes direction when it crosses the magnetic null.

Because the particle's orbits are not cyclotron, models of plasma behavior based on cyclotron motion like magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) are inapplicable in the region around the null. The size of this region is related to the s-parameter,[33] or the ratio of the distance between the null and separatrix, and the thermal ion gyroradius. At high-s, most particles do not cross the null and this effect is negligible. At low-s, ~2, this effect dominates and the FRC is said to be "kinetic" rather than "MHD."

Plasma stability

At low s-parameter, most ions inside an FRC follow large

Alfvén waves and almost no MHD instabilities despite their theoretical prediction,[citation needed] and it avoids the typical "anomalous transport", i.e. processes in which excess loss of particles or energy occurs.[34][35][36]

As of 2000[update], several remaining instabilities are being studied:

  • The
    oblate plasmas (i.e. very elongated plasmas),[37] or by creating a self-generated toroidal field.[38] The tilt mode has also been stabilized in FRC experiments by increasing the ion gyroradii.[33]
  • The magnetorotational instability. This mode causes a rotating elliptical distortion of the plasma boundary, and can destroy the FRC when the distorted plasma comes in contact with the confinement chamber.[39] Successful stabilization methods include the use of a quadrupole stabilizing field,[40][41] and the effects of a rotating magnetic field (RMF).[42][43]

Experiments

Selected field reverse experiments, pre-1988[5]
Year Device Location Device length
(meter) 		Device diameter
(meter) 		B-field
(tesla) 		Fill pressure
(pascal) 		Confinement
(seconds) 		Studied
1959 - NRL 0.10 0.06 10.00 13.33 2.E-06 Annihilation
1961 Scylla I LANL 0.11 0.05 5.50 11.33 3.E-06 Annihilation
1962 Scylla III LANL 0.19 0.08 12.50 11.33 4.E-06 Rotation
1962 Thetatron Culham 0.21 0.05 8.60 13.33 3.E-06 Contraction
1962 Julich[clarification needed] 0.10 0.04 6.00 30.66 1.E-06 Formation, tearing
1963 Culham 0.30 0.10 5.00 6.67 6.E-06 Contraction
1964 0-PII Garching[clarification needed] 0.30 0.05 5.30 13.33 1.E-06 Tearing, contraction
1965 Pharos NRL 1.80 0.17 3.00 8.00 3.E-05 Confinement, rotation
1967 Centaur Culham 0.50 0.19 2.10 2.67 2.E-05 Confinement, rotation
1967 Julietta Julich 1.28 0.11 2.70 6.67 2.E-05 Tearing
1971 E-G Garching 0.70 0.11 2.80 6.67 3.E-05 Tearing, rotation
1975 BN Kurchatov 0.90 0.21 0.45 0.27 - 1.07 5.E-05 Formation
1979 TOR Kurchatov 1.50 0.30 1.00 0.27 - 0.67 1.E-04 Formation
1979 FRX-A LASL 1.00 0.25 0.60 0.53 - 0.93 3.E-05 Confinement
1981 FRX-B LANL 1.00 0.25 1.30 1.20 - 6.53 6.E-05 Confinement
1982 STP-L Nagoya 1.50 0.12 1.00 1.20 3.E-05 Rotation
1982 NUCTE Nihon 2.00 0.16 1.00 6.E-05 Confinement, rotation
1982 PIACE Osaka 1.00 0.15 1.40 6.E-05 Rotation
1983 FRX-C LANL 2.00 0.50 0.80 0.67 - 2.67 3.E-04 Confinement
1984 TRX-1 MSNW 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.67 -2.00 2.E-04 Formation, confinement
1984 CTTX Penn S U 0.50 0.12 0.40 13.33 4.E-05 Confinement
1985 HBQM U Wash 3.00 0.22 0.50 0.53 - 0.93 3.E-05 Formation
1986 OCT Osaka 0.60 0.22 1.00 1.E-04 Confinement
1986 TRX-2 STI 1.00 0.24 1.30 0.40 - 2.67 1.E-04 Formation, confinement
1987 CSS U Wash 1.00 0.45 0.30 1.33 - 8.00 6.E-05 Slow formation
1988 FRXC/LSM LANL 2.00 0.70 0.60 0.27 - 1.33 5.E-04 Formation, confinement
1990 LSX STI/MSNW 5.00 0.90 0.80 0.27 - 0.67 Stability, confinement
Selected field reverse configurations, 1988 - 2011[44]
Device Institution Device type Electron density Max ion or electron FRC diameter Length/diameter
1020 / Meter3 Temperature [eV] [Meter]
Spheromak-3 Tokyo University Merging spheromak 5.0 – 10.0 20 – 100 0.40 1.0
Spheromak-4 Tokyo University Merging spheromak 10 – 40 1.20 - 1.40 0.5 – 0.7
Compact Torus Exp-III Nihon University Theta-pinch 5.0 – 400.0 200 – 300 0.10 - 0.40 5.0 – 10.0
Field-Reversed Exp Liner Los Alamos Theta-pinch 1,500.0 – 2,500.0 200 – 700 0.03 - 0.05 7.0 – 10.0
FRC Injection Exp Osaka University Translation trapping 3.0 – 5.0 200 – 300 0.30 - 0.40 7.0 – 15.0
Swarthmore Spheromak Exp Swarthmore Merging spheromak 100 20 – 40 0.40 1.5
Magnetic Reconnection Exp Princeton (PPPL) Merging spheromak 5.0 – 20.0 30 1.00 0.3 – 0.7
Princeton field-reversed configuration experiment
(PFRC)		 Princeton (PPPL) Rotating B-field 0.05 – 0.3 200 – 300 0.06
Translation Confinement Sustainment University of Washington Rotating B-field 0.1 – 2.5 25 – 50 0.70 - 0.74
Translation Confinement Sustainment-Upgrade University of Washington Rotating B-field 0.4 – 1.5 50 – 200 0.70 - 0.74 1.5 – 3.0
Plasma Liner Compression MSNW Translation trapping 0.20
Inductive Plasma Accelerator MSNW Merging collision 23.0 – 26.0 350 0.20
Inductive Plasma Accelerator-C MSNW Merging compression 300.0 1200 - 2000 0.2 10.0
Colorado FRC University of Colorado Merging spheromak
Irvine Field Reverse Configuration UC Irvine Coaxial source 150.0 10 0.60
C-2
Tri Alpha Energy, Inc.
 Merging collision 5.0 – 10.0 200 – 500 0.60 - 0.80 3.0 – 5.0
STX University of Washington Rotating B-field 0.5 40 0.4 6
Prairie View Rotamak Prairie View A&M Rotating B-field 0.1 10-30 0.4 2

Spacecraft propulsion

Field-reversed configuration devices have been considered for spacecraft propulsion. By angling the walls of the device outward, the plasmoid can be accelerated in the axial direction and out of the device, generating thrust.

External links

References

  1. ISBN 978-0-521-85107-7
    .
  2. ^ Freidberg, Jeffrey P. (2015). Plasma Physics and Fusion Energy (DJVU). Cambridge University Press. p. 335. Retrieved 13 May 2023 – via Internet Archive.
  3. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.3.5
    .(subscription required)
  4. S2CID 241339825
    .
  5. ^
    S2CID 122791237
    .
  6. S2CID 122374822
    .
  7. ^ "Web page of the Redmond Plasma Physics Laboratory". Archived from the original on 2015-02-19.
  8. OSTI 6514222
    .
  9. ^ Kirtley, David; Brown, Daniel L.; Gallimore, Alec D.; Haas, James (June 2005). Details on an AFRL Field Reversed Configuration Plasma Device (PDF) (Technical report). Air Force Research Laboratory.
  10. ^ "Web page of the Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison". Archived from the original on 2020-05-16. Retrieved 2014-06-08.
  11. Bibcode:2012APS..DPPPP8051C
    .
  12. S2CID 103136706
    .
  13. ^ Poddar, Yash (11 March 2014). "Can Startups Make Nuclear Fusion Possible?". Stanford University.
  14. ^ Pancotti, Anthony. "Testimony before the Space Subcommittee of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology United States House of Representatives Hearing on In-Space Propulsion: Strategic Choices and Options June 29, 2017" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 November 2022. Retrieved 8 April 2019.
  15. ^ "NASA's NextSTEP Advanced Electric Propulsion Activities" (PDF). NASA. 9 July 2018. Retrieved 8 April 2019.
  16. ISBN 978-1563969195
    .
  17. doi:10.1063/1.1649593
    .
  18. ^ Slough, John; Pancotti, Anthony; Pfaff, Michael; Pihl, Christopher; Votroubek, George (November 2012). The Fusion Driven Rocket (PDF). NIAC 2012. Hampton, VA: NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts.
  19. ^ Slough, John; Pancotti, Anthony; Kirtley, David; Votroubek, George (6–10 October 2013). Electromagnetically Driven Fusion Propulsion (PDF). 33rd International Electric Propulsion Conference (IEPC-2013). Washington, D.C.: George Washington University.
  20. ^ "Nuclear Fusion Rocket Could Reach Mars in 30 Days". Space.com. 10 April 2013.
  21. ISSN 1682-9344
    .
  22. ^ Dolan, Thomas. Magnetic Fusion Technology. Vol. 2. New York City: Springer, 2012. Print.
  23. S2CID 250871394
    .
  24. ^
    doi:10.13182/FST87-A25020
    . Retrieved 2016-01-05.
  25. S2CID 120579314
    .
  26. S2CID 250743246
    .
  27. doi:10.13182/FST96-A11963143
    .
  28. S2CID 59377360
    .
  29. ISSN 1070-664X
    .
  30. ISSN 1070-664X
    .
  31. ^
    S2CID 251140943
    .
  32. S2CID 120544136
    .
  33. ^
    S2CID 121761596
    .
  34. S2CID 32950265
    .
  35. S2CID 122582085
    .
  36. ^ Rostoker, N.; Binderbauer, M. W.; Wessel, F. J.; Monkhorst, H. J. Colliding Beam Fusion Reactor (PDF). Invited Paper, Special Session on Advanced Fuels APS-DPP. American Physical Society. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2002-01-26.
  37. doi:10.1063/1.2360912
    .
  38. ^ Omelchenko, Yu. A. (27–29 March 2000). Stabilization of the FRC Tilt Mode by a Self-Generated Toroidal Field (PDF). Sherwood 2000 International Fusion/Plasma Theory Conference. UCLA, Los Angeles, California: General Atomics Fusion Energy Research. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-12-16.
  39. S2CID 250861012
    .
  40. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.1042
    .
  41. doi:10.1063/1.864298
    .
  42. PMID 15904379
    .
  43. PMID 10970525. Archived from the original
    (PDF) on 2012-10-17.
  44. ISSN 1070-664X
    .
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Field-reversed_configuration&oldid=1218319808"