Spent nuclear fuel
Spent nuclear fuel, occasionally called used nuclear fuel, is
Nuclear fuel rods become progressively more radioactive (and less thermally useful) due to
Nature of spent fuel
Nanomaterial properties
In the oxide
Cs
In the case of mixed oxide (
Also metallic particles of an
Fission products
3% of the mass consists of fission products of
The fission products can modify the
Table of chemical data
Element | Gas | Metal | Oxide | Solid solution |
---|---|---|---|---|
Br Kr | Yes | - | - | - |
Rb | Yes | - | Yes | - |
Sr | - | - | Yes | Yes |
Y | - | - | - | Yes |
Zr | - | - | Yes | Yes |
Nb | - | - | Yes | - |
Mo | - | Yes | Yes | - |
Tc Ru Rh Pd Ag Cd In Sb | - | Yes | - | - |
Te | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
I Xe | Yes | - | - | - |
Cs | Yes | - | Yes | - |
Ba | - | - | Yes | Yes |
La Ce Pr Nd Pm Sm Eu | - | - | - | Yes |
Plutonium
About 1% of the mass is 239Pu and
Uranium
96% of the mass is the remaining uranium: most of the original 238U and a little 235U. Usually 235U would be less than 0.8% of the mass along with 0.4% 236U.
Reprocessed uranium will contain 236U, which is not found in nature; this is one isotope that can be used as a fingerprint for spent reactor fuel.
If using a thorium fuel to produce fissile 233U, the SNF (Spent Nuclear Fuel) will have 233U, with a half-life of 159,200 years (unless this uranium is removed from the spent fuel by a chemical process). The presence of 233U will affect the long-term radioactive decay of the spent fuel. If compared with MOX fuel, the activity around one million years in the cycles with thorium will be higher due to the presence of the not fully decayed 233U.
For
Some natural uranium fuels use chemically active cladding, such as Magnox, and need to be reprocessed because long-term storage and disposal is difficult.[5]
Minor actinides
Spent reactor fuel contains traces of the
For highly enriched fuels used in marine reactors and research reactors, the isotope inventory will vary based on in-core fuel management and reactor operating conditions.
Spent fuel decay heat
When a nuclear reactor has been
Spent fuel that has been removed from a reactor is ordinarily stored in a water-filled spent fuel pool for a year or more (in some sites 10 to 20 years) in order to cool it and provide shielding from its radioactivity. Practical spent fuel pool designs generally do not rely on passive cooling but rather require that the water be actively pumped through heat exchangers. If there is a prolonged interruption of active cooling due to emergency situations, the water in the spent fuel pools may therefore boil off, possibly resulting in radioactive elements being released into the atmosphere.[6]
Fuel composition and long term radioactivity
The use of different fuels in nuclear reactors results in different SNF composition, with varying activity curves.
Long-lived radioactive waste from the back end of the fuel cycle is especially relevant when designing a complete waste management plan for SNF. When looking at long-term
An example of this effect is the use of nuclear fuels with thorium. Th-232 is a fertile material that can undergo a neutron capture reaction and two beta minus decays, resulting in the production of fissile U-233. Its radioactive decay will strongly influence the long-term activity curve of the SNF around a million years. A comparison of the activity associated to U-233 for three different SNF types can be seen in the figure on the top right. The burnt fuels are Thorium with Reactor-Grade Plutonium (RGPu), Thorium with Weapons-Grade Plutonium (WGPu) and Mixed Oxide fuel (MOX, no thorium). For RGPu and WGPu, the initial amount of U-233 and its decay around a million years can be seen. This has an effect in the total activity curve of the three fuel types. The initial absence of U-233 and its daughter products in the MOX fuel results in a lower activity in region 3 of the figure on the bottom right, whereas for RGPu and WGPu the curve is maintained higher due to the presence of U-233 that has not fully decayed. Nuclear reprocessing can remove the actinides from the spent fuel so they can be used or destroyed (see Long-lived fission product#Actinides).
Spent fuel corrosion
Noble metal nanoparticles and hydrogen
According to the work of
Storage, treatment, and disposal
Spent nuclear fuel is stored either in spent fuel pools (SFPs) or in dry casks. In the United States, SFPs and casks containing spent fuel are located either directly on nuclear power plant sites or on Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (ISFSIs). ISFSIs can be adjacent to a nuclear power plant site, or may reside away-from-reactor (AFR ISFSI). The vast majority of ISFSIs store spent fuel in dry casks. The Morris Operation is currently the only ISFSI with a spent fuel pool in the United States.
Alternatively, the intact spent nuclear fuel can be directly disposed of as high-level radioactive waste. The United States has planned disposal in deep geological formations, such as the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository, where it has to be shielded and packaged to prevent its migration to humans' immediate environment for thousands of years.[1][9] On March 5, 2009, however, Energy Secretary Steven Chu told a Senate hearing that "the Yucca Mountain site no longer was viewed as an option for storing reactor waste."[10]
Geological disposal has been approved in Finland, using the KBS-3 process.[11]
In Switzerland, the Federal Council approved in 2008, the plan for the deep geological repository for radioactive waste.[12]
Remediation
Researchers have looked at the bioaccumulation of strontium by Scenedesmus spinosus (algae) in simulated wastewater. The study claims a highly selective biosorption capacity for strontium of S. spinosus, suggesting that it may be appropriate for use of nuclear wastewater.[14] A study of the pond alga Closterium moniliferum using non-radioactive strontium found that varying the ratio of barium to strontium in water improved strontium selectivity.[13]
Risks
Spent nuclear fuel stays a radiation hazard for extended periods of time with half-lifes as high as 24,000 years. For example 10 years after removal from a reactor, the surface dose rate for a typical spent fuel assembly still exceeds 10,000 rem/hour—far greater than the fatal whole-body dose for humans of about 500 rem received all at once.[15]
There is debate over whether spent fuel stored in a pool is susceptible to incidents such as earthquakes[16] or terrorist attacks[17] that could potentially result in a release of radiation.[18]
In the rare occurrence of a fuel failure during normal operation, the primary coolant can enter the element. Visual techniques are normally used for the postirradiation inspection of fuel bundles.[19]
Since the September 11 attacks the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has instituted a series of rules mandating that all fuel pools be impervious to natural disaster and terrorist attack. As a result, used fuel pools are encased in a steel liner and thick concrete, and are regularly inspected to ensure resilience to earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, and seiches.[20][21]
See also
- Nuclear power
- Spent nuclear fuel shipping cask
- Nuclear meltdown
References
- ^ a b Large, John H: Radioactive Decay Characteristics of Irradiated Nuclear Fuels, January 2006.[clarification needed]
- .
- ^ Dong-Joo Kim, Jae-Ho Yang, Jong-Hun Kim, Young-Woo Rhee, Ki-Won Kang, Keon-Sik Kim and Kun-Woo Song, Thermochimica Acta, 2007, 455, 123–128.
- ^ "Solution of Fission Products in UO2" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-09-10. Retrieved 2008-05-18.
- ^ "RWMAC's Advice to Ministers on the Radioactive Waste Implications of Reprocessing". Radioactive Waste Management Advisory Committee (RWMAC). 3 November 2002. Archived from the original on 29 August 2008. Retrieved 2008-05-18.
- ^ "Nuclear Crisis in Japan FAQs". Union of Concerned Scientists. Archived from the original on 2011-04-20. Retrieved 2011-04-19.
- ^ "David W. Shoesmith". University of Western Ontario. Retrieved 2008-05-18.
- ^ "Electrochemistry and corrosion studies at Western". Shoesmith research group, University of Western Ontario. Retrieved 2008-05-18.
- ^ Testimony of Robert Meyers Principal deputy Assistant Administrator for the Office of Air and Radiation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency before the subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality Committee on Energy and Commerce U. S. House of Representatives, July 15, 2008
- ^ Hebert, H. Josef. "Nuclear waste won't be going to Nevada's Yucca Mountain, Obama official says". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on 2011-03-24.
- .
- ^ SFOE, Swiss Federal Office of Energy. "Sectoral Plan for Deep Geological Repositories". www.bfe.admin.ch. Retrieved 2020-10-19.
- ^ PMID 21628117.
- PMID 24919131.
- ^ "Backgrounder on Radioactive Waste". www.nrc.gov. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). 2021-06-23. Retrieved 2021-05-10.
- ^ Parenti, Christian (March 15, 2011). "Fukushima's Spent Fuel Rods Pose Grave Danger". The Nation.
- ^ "Are Nuclear Spent Fuel Pools Secure?". Council on Foreign Relations. June 7, 2003. Archived from the original on 2011-04-12. Retrieved 2011-04-05.
- ^ Benjamin, Mark (March 23, 2011). "How Safe Is Nuclear-Fuel Storage in the U.S.?". Time Magazine. Archived from the original on March 25, 2011.
- .
- ^ "Fact Sheet on Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel". Archived from the original on 2014-10-27. Retrieved 2017-06-25.
- ^ "Nuclear Waste Disposal". Archived from the original on 2012-07-06. Retrieved 2012-06-05.