This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Anti Romeo squads in uttar Pradesh, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See
It covers a topic on which we already have an article -
section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Uttar Pradesh Police, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page
.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
Hello, I'm Jim1138. An edit you recently made to Punjabi cuisine seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 07:39, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
@Jim1138: I know I just now detected it.Due to inavertent reasons (malfunctioning of ProveIt) the flaw occured. Ill Put the relevant info back from the last version.I am actually trying to remove bare Urls from the page.Also try not to template me again I have suuficient experience with regards to editingFORCE RADICAL (talk) 07:44, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
I didn't get your
wp:ping
. They are tricky. You need to add the ping, message, your signature, and save all three with a single "Save changes".
Unfortunately, there is a lot of vandalism and bad edits. And not very many
wp:RCPers. So, we tend to be quick on the draw. I understand what you are doing, but you might find others confused. Unfortunately with wp:Huggle, there is no "check later to see if they fixed it". Don't worry too much, we all get dinged in the beginning. Eventually, you should get whitelisted and then you're on your own. Cheers Jim1138 (talk
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Category:Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Triology. Since you had some involvement with the Category:Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Triology redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —swpbT 18:07, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Your RFA question [1]
Here. Hello. I hope you don't mind me asking, but I notice you have not been with very long :) so how do you know about that? (As you say in your edit summary, it was your 'first timer') question. Thanks in advance! —
semper crescis, aut decrescis
14:03, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
@
Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: I presume you are talking about my knowledge of the 'best known for IP' and his acts. While searching for different notability guidelines and other policy I came across this
,To test this users in depth knowledge in ANI (I believe admins should have a huge knowledge of these ANI matters to weed out troublesome users) I asked the particular question.To resolve your doubts about my edit summary 'first timer' was meant to indicate that this was my first ever participation in RFA.11:15, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Ah. :) Many thanks! —
semper crescis, aut decrescis
11:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Your RFA question [2]
One additional gentle request from me too (please feel free to ignore this in case you feel this is OTT). Could you correct the English grammar in your RfA queries and give more context for the same? Thanks. Lourdes 13:19, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Sorry I was late (at answering your request) .Also the question asked by Fortuna was regarding an older Rfa so i have taken the liberty of separating the two questions. English grammar was never my strong point so if you find anything wrong please take the liberty of correcting it immediately from next time onward .If you find it intelligible just ping me
⭮
@ 04:30, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Hello, FR30799386/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there! Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui雲水 10:50, 26 May 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:37, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Narada sting operation
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk
) 09:50, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 13:40, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 13:21, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 15:29, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:09, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
was allowed to create article which unfortunately again got redirected :-(
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
You'll find it in the history of
Kohinoor (book). You spaced the title incorrectly, and the article did not contain evidence of notability. Deb (talk
Thanks. Please add the references to the article. Deb (talk) 10:42, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Just a clarification I hope you are saying that I can replace the redirect with an article or are you asking me to place the sources in William Darymple article FORCE RADICAL (talk) 11:01, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
I'm asking that you include the references if you decide to recreate the article. Deb (talk) 11:11, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This week's
article for improvement
(week 27, 2017)
Ultraviolet photography is one of the many visual technologies. This image of the rings of Saturn is an example of the application of ultraviolet photography in astronomy.
Hi, Thanks for volunteering at the West Bengal FARC.
To-do list will include:
1. Updating the data (economy etc) with updated reference,
2. Getting rid of some images (the article is image-heavy)
3. Going through the prose to, at least, get rid of wrong grammar or errors
After such basic things are complete, we can request
WP:GUILD for an improved copyedit. Please let me know your concerns, I will try to help whenever I have time. Thanks, --Dwaipayan (talk
Except a stray support and congratulations for the new admins I am not to participate in RFA discussions.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi. Thank you for your participation. Please read
WP:RFAV, in particular the section on user questions. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk
) 04:56, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
I guess I understand what both of you are hinting at .It may have been true for the first two questions which I asked in earlier RFAs but this time my question certainly had a purpose .I had seen Cullen around for a long time helping about in The Teahouse, in fact I respect the way he arbitrates disputes. In RFA I attach a lot of importance to the deletion part but with no CSD log to go upon and the answer to the A7 question not satisfactory (he did not mention the credibility bit) I asked the question to clarify my doubts and I am happy to say my doubts have been resolved .If you think that me asking the question was wrong then you are at your liberty to strike out the question or any further interaction I may have with the candidate. ThanksRADICALSODA(FORCE) 08:25, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
KudpungOd Mishehu As I had said in the note .I accept that the article was in extremely bad shape and was eligible to be deleted my question was which maintenance tags about which maintained tags/Deletion tags would he have applied in that case which I hope clears up both of your misconceptions.Thanks-RADICALSODA(FORCE) 10:16, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
My issue is with the fact that a) the en.Wiki is the only Wikipedia left where you would be allowed to participate on a RfA, b) with only just over 100 edits to mainspace you shyould theoretically not even know yet that an RfA system exists, and c) I do not consider it a particularly mature move to even question the knowledge of someone whose work is without blemish and knows more about our guidelines and policies than even I do. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
KudpungSince you brought up this topic my edits are a little exactly 200 at mainspace having edited earlier via another account as disclosed at my user page. After getting warned in my former account I took some time of and read up all the guidelines and in the process discovered the WP:Rfa . As for your other allegations I myself have seldom used Teahouse and thus had limited (I did see him handling a particularly bad tempered editor though) contact with the candidate. How was I to know the candidates credentials ?I had my doubts and I clarified them through a question and then supported him.I do not have any hard feeling with any person nor was this a trick question intact I send each and every new admin a congratulations message whatever my stance may have been. As I have said before feel free to strike out the question and redevel it if you feel it is unadminisible in the RFA. But please remember WP:BITE and WP:AGF which you seem to be throwing out of the window by accusing me of trolling the RFA. RADICALSODA(FORCE) 11:12, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
I retract my comments at the base of the last comment .I guess your tone made me lose my temper sorryRADICALSODA(FORCE) 11:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
I understand - my tone is the one I used to use to the students in my classes. The point I'm making is that you are no way ready to be involving yourself in such important meta areas. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:22, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Except a stray support and congratulations for the new admins you can count on me not participating in RFA discussions. If you do find me doing such a thing please give a virtual tap on the back with that tone of your (joking) which should be enough to bring me to my sensesRADICALSODA(FORCE) 11:45, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Hello, FR30799386/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there! Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Joseph2302 (talk) 09:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
On 24 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Karimul Haque, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that tea garden worker Karimul Haque has been awarded India's fourth highest civilian award? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Karimul Haque. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Karimul Haque), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
I fixed an error, it was not a test, if you read the sentence you will see that the word "_/help" is nonsense in the context of the sentence and the article. Φράγκος Στάθης (talk) 05:22, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Φράγκος ΣτάθηςIts okay.I acknowledge my mistake but from next time onwards always leave an edit summary.I would also like you to change your username since this is English Wikipedia and names in other languages may not be displayed correctly.Also your name may be difficult to understand for other people RADICALSODA(FORCE) 05:32, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peadorᐐT₳LKᐬ 10:15, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peadorᐐT₳LKᐬ 15:19, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
WP:IAR and went ahead and removed the CSD template and informed you on your talk page about your fault.Thanks-RADICALSODA(FORCE)
Hi again. Do you think Christy Goldsmith Romero is too stubby for another DYK please? Please ping when you reply, or write on my talkpage. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 11:20, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Zigzig20sGenerally any article above 1500 characters is considered eligible for DYK .I advice you to install the script User:Shubinator/DYKcheck .It is officially recognised by DYK and checks most of the criterion. ThanksRADICALSODA(FORCE) 11:31, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Zigzig20s Sorry for the short reply (I had some meatspace priorities at that time and so could not respond properly).Yes the article is okay for nomination for DYK. The stub template which you yourself added may be a concern as it may be taken by others to mean that the article is still under-construction . You will surely be able to nominate the article yourself .Just follow the instructions on the top of the nomiations page and fill in the necessary details(hook ,source, Alt1 if needed) and then someone else will review your nom in due courseRADICALSODA(FORCE) 04:39, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi, can you describe what you're seeing and indicate which browser you're using, what other gadgets or user scripts, etc.? It seems to be working fine for me, but I may be missing something. – Minh Nguyễn💬 02:54, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
I don't know but the problem seems to have disappeared .I have a gut feeling it was caused by a very slow internet transmission speed and rapid shifting surfing of talkpages .The scripts I use can be found at User:Forceradical/common.js .I use Google chrome as a browser.If I have the same problems again I will inform youRADICALSODA(FORCE) 05:10, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Force Radical – You can see that I have completed the copy-edit you requested of West Bengal. Let me know if you have any questions. I just wanted to mention three things:
1) The following sentence, which appears in the middle of the second paragraph in West Bengal#Sports, needs fixing. It does not make sense, particularly the last part of the sentence:
Kolkata Knight Riders, East Zone, and Bengal play there, and the 1987 World Cup final was there although in 2011 World Cup.
2) You will see that, several times, I removed the word "as", for example in saying the Hindu College was renamed as the Presidency College. I know the article is written in Indian English, and I suppose this is common in Indian English. I am used to U.S. English, and in U.S. English we ordinarily don't use "as" there. Look through my edits, and see where I removed "as". If you feel strongly that it should be written with "as", feel free to put the word back in, or tell me where you want the word put back in and I'll gladly do it for you.
3) You often used the word "like", to my mind, incorrectly (but again, this may be acceptable in Indian English). For each one, I changed it to either "including" or "such as". It is my understanding that "like" is used to show similarity, as in X looks like, seems like, etc., or Y works like a..., sings like a (using a simile), or as an adverb meaning "in the same way as", as in "Like his brother, he preferred working outdoors." Of course, "like" can be a verb. Except in informal speech, "like" is ordinarily not used to mean "for example". If you feel strongly that this last use of "like" is acceptable in Indian English, that is, instead of "for example," "including" or "such as", feel free to put all, or some, back the way they were (perhaps some would be better than all, because you used "like" quite frequently). Well, that's all. Best regards, – Corinne (talk) 14:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC) (Amended this paragraph to make it slightly clearer.)
Hello, Forceradical – In this edit, you made an attempt to clarify the sentence I had said needed fixing. It is still not clear. I will copy the paragraph (minus the citations) here for easy reference:
West Bengal has several large stadiums. Eden Gardens is one of only two 100,000-seat cricket amphitheaters in the world, although renovations will reduce this figure. It is the home to various cricket teams such as Kolkata Knight Riders, East Zone.The 1987 World Cup final was hosted in Eden Gardens .although in 2011 World Cup.
I see you broke up the third sentence into two sentences. Apart from the stray period/full stop before "although", the [new] fourth sentence is not clear. The word "although" is normally used to signal an upcoming contrast with what preceded it. If you look at the first sentence, you will see a correct use of "although". In the [new] fourth sentence, I do not see any contrast between "The 1987 World Cup final was hosted in Eden Gardens" and "in 2011 World Cup" (which, by the way, should be a complete clause, with a subject and a verb). Are you sure you don't mean "also" – "the 1987 World Cup final was hosted at Eden Gardens, and the 2011 World Cup [competition? final?] was held at Eden Gardens" (or something like that)? Was there something different about the 2011 World Cup held at Eden Gardens from the 1987 World Cup final held at Eden Gardens? If so, that difference ought to be made clear. If the only difference was the year, and both were World Cup finals, then you can combine them into one subject: "Both the 1987 and the 2011 World Cup finals were held at Eden Gardens." Also – and this is merely a stylistic consideration – since you use "although" in the second sentence of the paragraph, in such a short paragraph it would be best not to use the word again in the paragraph. There are other ways to signal contrast if you need to, including with "but" or "however". If you need help formulating the sentence, try to explain to me what, if any, the difference is between the two World Cups.
There is another small problem with this paragraph, and that is that there is a slight ambiguity in the pronoun "It" in the third sentence:
What is "it"? If you look back to the two sentences before this, you see two singular nouns that could possibly be "home" to a cricket team: "West Bengal" and "Eden Gardens [amphitheater]". I guess it's pretty clear that "it" refers to "Eden Gardens", but it would be clearer if you use a noun: "The amphitheater is home to various cricket teams..." By the way, is "amphitheater" the commonly used word for the venue in India? If it is, that's fine. In the US, it is "stadium". Also, if you use "amphitheater", is that Indian English spelling? I think British English spelling would be "amphitheatre", wouldn't it? Finally, you need "and" between the two cricket teams: "such as Kolkata Knight Riders and East Zone". – Corinne (talk) 14:30, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Please see this edit. I hope this solves the problem. Also do you prefer the before each cricket team names? (I added the thes) Thanks a lot. Regards, --Dwaipayan (talk) 17:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
I'm sorry, Dwaipayanc, I didn't see this until today. It reads well now, after your re-wording. Good work! I agree that it sounds better with "the" before each team name. I'm wondering, though, about something. In the list of three cricket teams, the first and the third – the Kolkata Knight Riders and the East Zone – sound like real names of teams, but "the Bengal cricket team" does not. Is "the Bengal cricket team" really the name of the team? If not, perhaps you could find the actual name of the team and add it there. – Corinne (talk) 15:42, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk
is Wikipedia's house style guide. It is full of guidelines developed specificially for the purposes of writing on Wikipedia.
The simplified Manual of Style
are the essentials for starting-out. (The main page is huge and has dozens of sub-pages.)
Be careful to review any semi-automated edits made by scripts. (I noticed one which correctly moved punctuation to the left side of a reference, but failed to add a trailing space.) When a script detects one problem, there are often other issues lurking nearby.
@Reidgreg--Thanks for the prompt help. Ill look over the reading material (I have read some of the Tony1 exercises).Please review any articles that I do (since I am new to copyediting).I also want to ask if there is a way to filter out articles about a certain topic (ex:India) which need CE--RADICALSODA(FORCE) 09:29, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
I may be too busy to do reviewing this month, but you can make a request on the drive talk page (it's only redlinked now because nobody has had anything to say yet, but the coordinators should all be watching it). For finding articles, you can use Wikipedia's search engine to cross-reference categories. For example, you can copy&paste incategory:"India" incategory:"Wikipedia articles needing copy edit from January 2017" into the search box at the top-right. However, I'm weirdly not finding entries that way, so perhaps try the more general India incategory:"Wikipedia articles needing copy edit from January 2017". That gives me 14 results (as of writing this), and if you don't like those you can try the same thing for February and March. I like searching this way because it also shows you a little bit of the article and the overall size (but don't use that wordcount on your article list, as it includes references!). I hope that's of help. P.S.: Since you're new to this, try to pick articles of under 2,000 words. Longer articles become increasingly more difficult to copy edit (more issues, and more difficult to maintain consistency). – Reidgreg (talk) 21:08, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Radio Erena
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk
) 21:02, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
This week's
article for improvement
(week 36, 2017)
One 24-ounce energy drink has 330 calories, more than a fast-food cheeseburger, and the equivalent of 18 single-serving packets of sugar.
On 6 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bipin Ganatra, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Bipin Ganatra, an electrician by trade, has voluntarily helped Kolkata firefighters battle more than 100 fires over the past 40 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bipin Ganatra. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bipin Ganatra), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hi FR30799386, you accepted a request made at the GOCE Requests page to copy-edit the article Anjaana Anjaani. Your last edit to the article was at 11:30 UTC, 31 August 2017 and you haven't yet declared the copy-edit done on the Requests page. Please tell us whether the copy-edit is completed—or whether you intend to complete it—so the request can be archived, left alone or returned to the list for someone else to work on. If no update is received and you make no further edits to the article in seven days a GOCE coordinator will strike your acceptance and return the request to the list. Thank you. Miniapolis 18:32, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
MiniapolisIll try my best the problem is that I have been caught up in pujo preparation if by Mahalaya I do not put up a done template feel free to return it to the list—RADICALSODA(FORCE)TM 09:46, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
FYI
Just wanted to give you a heads up on this redirect. Only did it because there were so many versions flying around, it seemed best to redirect to the version that you merged into. Please feel free to undo it, but I thought it was the easiest way to direct people to the current mockup. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:54, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![1]
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
Thanks for helping to get
WP:LANDING up and running. It looks great and your efforts here are much appreciated. TonyBallioni (talk
I ask you to please reconsider your tag on the above article. Several of the 16 references in the article are not very "closely associated with the subject," and the claims made in the article are not that incredible. My understanding is that one independent source to show that the institution is what it claims to be suffices; description of the school can come from sources close to the school (which are usually the only ones who care to report about the school). I've checked several pages of Google references and suggest that we should be satisfied with what we have, without the ugly tag. In line with your advisory about being in the midst of exams, I have removed the tag and await your directions on what we can do if you still regard the article as subjective rather than objective fact. Jzsj (talk) 17:19, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Well,since you have already removed the tag Ill not replace it. As you said some of the sources are not affiliated to the school .It would be best if you could eradicate the sources linked to the school (refs:1,2,3,4,11(blog),15,16) --Forceradical (talk) 04:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
This barnstar is awarded to Forceradical for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE September 2017 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 15:42, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Glad to see you back! – Reidgreg (talk) 15:42, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
This week's
article for improvement
(week 41, 2017)
Wikipedia is sometimes criticized for being used as a source of circular reporting.
Rember never to get lured by "Reasonably priced shoes at high prices"
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Annie Sinha Roy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annie Sinha Roy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Galobtter (talk) 10:16, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:00, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
Yes, I got to know that. You can work on WB and resolve all the queries raised at its FARC and take it to GA. If you want to. Yashthepunisher (talk) 10:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
TFL notification
Hi, Force Radical. I'm just posting to let you know that
List of Vice-Presidents of India. They have helped in improving the article. I just have a suggestion, not about your edits but about the edit comments. I see that most of your edits have been reasonably labeled and easy to parse. Unfortunately, some edit comments are sort of vague like "Okay", "thats that", "that's all". Now this is not something incorrect or wrong on your part but adds a bit of additional work to other editors watching the page. A small improvement here would be to be slightly more precise in what your edit was about. This can also be in short hand given it can get time consuming but will help other edits parse them better. This was not a criticism but just a suggestion. Keep up all the good work and happy editing. Adamgerber80 (talk
) 05:33, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Adam-Thanks for the reminder. Will try and follow your advice and correctly use edit summaries.Happy New Year.
PS:Keep up the anti-vandalism work you are doing! —
No real claim of notability in the article, although the presence of a number of sources may constitute a minor claim in and of itself.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
It is being planned to organize Wikigraphists Bootcamp in India, please fill out the survey form to help the organizers. Your responses will help organizers understand what level of demand there is for the event (how many people in your community think it is important that the event happens). At the end of the day, the participants will turn out to have knowledge to create drawings, illustrations, diagrams, maps, graphs, bar charts etc. and get to know to how to tune the images to meet the QI and FP criteria. For more information and link to survey form, please visit Talk:Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:46, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorris Francis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:47, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
If you find time for it could you take a look at my recent noms at TAFI
Wikipedia:Today's articles for improvement/Nominations. Would appreciate no matter what !vote as no one is attending the TAFI nom page anymore to give input. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! epicgenius (talk
) 18:38, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
FLC
Hi FR, hope you're doing fine. Can you please leave your comments at my FLC? Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:08, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Supporting Indian Wikipedia Program resource distribution
In 2017 - 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India chapter (WMIN) and user groups will pilot a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program (Code name: Project Tiger) will:
(a) Support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and
(b) Sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.
The objective of the program is to provide laptops and internet stipends for existing editors who need support to contribute more actively. 50 basic model Acer Chromebooks and Internet stipends for 100 contributors are available for distribution. Provided resources are the sole property of the beneficiaries and should be used for the betterment of the movement.
If you're an active Wikimedian, and interested to receive support from this project, please apply. It will take around 10 minutes of your time, and will ask descriptive questions about your contribution to Indic Wikimedia projects.
Hello, Force Radical – I have one or two things I want to mention, but I'll get to them in a little while. – Corinne (talk) 23:01, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
I'm sorry for the delay, Force Radical. Here are some thoughts:
1) In the lead, you have these two sentences:
The fire was caused by a short circuit in the lifts. A probe by the government into this incident revealed that illegal construction of two storeys and the lack of a fire clearance were major reasons for the blaze.
The first sentence says clearly that the fire was caused by a short circuit in the lifts. The second sentence provides two more reasons. I think you need to do one of two things (depending upon the actual report of the investigation):
(a) mention all three as causes in one sentence, or
(s) maybe change "The fire was caused" to "The fire was started" in the first sentence (but not absolutely necessary) and, in the second sentence, change "were major reasons for the blaze" to "were major factors that contributed to the blaze spreading throughout the building" or "...to the blaze getting out of control". Something like that.
2) In the section
Stephen Court Fire#Building
, you have this sentence:
Stephen Court is a seven-storied building located on plot 18 A in the posh locality of Park Street, Calcutta.
(a) The phrase "the posh locality" presents two problems, to my mind:
(i) "posh" is British/Indian English; American readers are not used to seeing/hearing the word, so may not get the picture;
(ii) "posh" is also a bit subjective. You might consider changing the phrase to "an upscale neighborhood".
(b) I think "seven-storied" should be spelled "seven-storey" – a seven-storey building".
3) In
Stephen Court Fire#Aftermath
, you have these two sentences:
A few residents were allowed to use the building weeks after the fire but had to sign risk bonds for six months. Moreover, the supply of electricity and of water to the building were cut off by the KMC.
(a) You might want to elaborate a bit on "sign risk bonds". Not everyone will know what those are. Perhaps just add a phrase, something like this:
...absolving the city of any liability in case of injury.
(b) I wonder whether it would be possible to supply the reason why the supply of electricity and water were cut off.
4) In the section
Stephen Court Fire#Fire
, you have this sentence:
A woman was reported to have missed her step and fell five floors below.
Readers might wonder whether this woman died from her fall ("fell to her death") or was merely injured. Also, if you can find the information, you might wish to say what she fell onto – the sidewalk? The street?
5) I'm just wondering why there is no mention in the article of accountability. Was no one held responsible for allowing the two extra floors to be built without proper fire-fighting equipment in place and without updating the wiring? Was no one held responsible for allowing the building to be overused, placing a strain on old wiring?
Well, that's all. – Corinne (talk) 23:48, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
6) I want to ask you about a few things in the section
Stephen Court Fire#Illegal construction
. I will copy the entire paragraph here for ease of reference, and I am going to number the sentences:
(1) Around 1930 a fourth storey was added to the building without the necessary civic sanction, followed by two more in 1984. (2) The civic authorities had slapped a notice on the buildings management authorities. (3) In the same year the illegally constructed portion was regularized by the payment of a penalty. (4) A mezzanine floor was also constructed between the ground floor and first floor, the date of construction of which is not known.
(a) The phrase "civic sanction" will not be understood by American readers. Perhaps change it to "without the necessary building permits"? Would that make sense to Indian readers?
(b) I think, in sentence (2), you should mention when the authorities slapped a notice on the buildings management authorities. Also, the past perfect tense, "had slapped", is only necessary if the authorities made that move before 1930. If it wasn't before 1930, I recommend changing "had slapped" to "slapped". Also, I think "a notice" should be "a notice of violation" or "a notice of building code violation".
(c) (i) In sentence (3), you have "in the same year", but this is not clear if you don't give the year in sentence (2).
(ii) It is not clear whether "the illegally constructed portion" refers to the fourth storey built in 1930, the two built in 1984, or both. I think this should be made clearer.
(iii) Instead of "the illegally constructed portion", why not say "the illegally constructed floors, or storeys? If you use "portion", readers might wonder what this portion was.
Now I will continue to take a look at your changes. – Corinne (talk) 16:59, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
They look fine. What is a "liftman caretaker"? I know that "liftman" means (in American English) "elevator operator", so that's all right, but why "caretaker"? Do you mean he was a supervisor? Or the full-time liftman? – Corinne (talk) 17:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. With 53 contestants qualifying, the groups for round 2 are slightly smaller than usual, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining users.
Our top scorers in round 1 were:
Aoba47 led the field with a featured article, 8 good articles and 42 GARs, giving a total of 666 points.
FrB.TG , a WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points, gained from a featured article and masses of bonus points.
Ssven2, another WikiCup newcomer, was in third place with 403 points, garnered from a featured article, a featured list, a good article and twelve GARs.
Ceranthor, Numerounovedant, Carbrera, Farang Rak Tham and Cartoon network freak all had over 200 points, but like all the other contestants, now have to start again from scratch. A good achievement was the 193 GARs performed by WikiCup contestants, comparing very favourably with the 54 GAs they achieved.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on
Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews
.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) and Vanamonde (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, FR30799386. You have new messages at Titodutta's talk page. Message added 18:28, 2 March 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Yashthepunisher -- Yashthepunisher (talk
) 08:21, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Stephen Court fire
On 12 March 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stephen Court fire, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Stephen Court fire, which killed 43 people, was caused by a short-circuit? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Stephen Court fire), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Beg pardon, but these things bother me. In the article is:
Initially thought to be from a short circuit from a lift in between the fifth and sixth floors, the fire spread upwards and sideways, engulfing ...
The problem is "Initially thought to be from ..." ought to be followed later by what the authorities eventually found the cause to be. But no other discussion of a different cause is stated.
Did you perhaps mean to have something like
The fire is thought to have been initiated by a short circuit from a lift in between the fifth and sixth floors, the fire spread upwards and sideways, engulfing ...
though perhaps using the word 'started' would be better?
Oh, I see in some of the comments above that "fire was started" was mentioned. I'm just looking for the correct meaning to be seen. (And I see your page notice above, but really don't want to "change the meaning" without your approval!) Shenme (talk) 05:15, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
I guess your right as intially is probably a holdover from some of the more gossipy newspapers I summarised. That being said I would suggest that you make the change yourself as I am slightly caught up with meatspace priorities at the moment —
Cool, I see it's updated by you. Thanks! Shenme (talk) 09:48, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Trinetra scam
concern
Hi there, I'm
Draft:Trinetra scam
, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request
Userfication
of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 196.80.165.7 -- 196.80.165.7 (talk
After your heads up I took a another look at the page and found it to be unambiguous breaching the copyvio guidelines. And I tagged it as such(with some goof ups due to the unusually laggy mobile interface) —
, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Kailash29792(talk) 18:20, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Congratulations on the success :) Also, I think you should list your achievements (FLs, DYKs etc.) and the barnstars in your userpage. Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:27, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Hey mate, just wanted to inform you that I have finished the Kerala Blasters page edits you wanted me to do. Cheers. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 18:20, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Hey, just want to say thanks for reviewing the page and eventually helping me get it up to GA. This has been something I have been working on for nearly three years so great to see it finally happen. Now to start the next step... getting the page to featured article status. Cheers. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 19:00, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Some pages have templates that describe problems with that article. There is now more information for mobile readers and what is wrong with the article and how they could help fix it. [1]
The sort order of categories will have errors for a short time starting Monday 9 April (UTC). We are upgrading versions of an internationalisation library (ICU) and using a script to update the database. This will take between a few hours and a few days depending on wiki size. You can read more details. [3]
Tag filter titles will now work better on wikis where the tag filter title is in a language that is written in another direction than the language of that wiki. This could for example be an English title (written from left to right) on a Hebrew or an Arabic wiki (written from right to left). [4]
Problems
The bookmark icon for saved filters on the recent changes page disappeared because of new icon changes. This has now been fixed. [5]
For a week in March rollbacks got both the rollback and the undo tag on the recent changes page and other pages where you see tags. This has now been fixed. [6]
Changes later this week
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 10 April. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 11 April. It will be on all wikis from 12 April (calendar).
Patrolled edits now have three states instead of two. Recent changes filters are updated to show unpatrolled, autopatrolled and manually patrolled edits. [7]
Meetings
You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 10 April at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 11 April at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes later this week
Profiling statistics for an abuse filter tell how often edits match the filter. The statistics for the abuse filters were reset after 10000 actions. Wikis can now decide to reset it more or less often. They can file a phabricator task to do so. [8]
Abuse filters will now treat integers and floats more precisely. For example, 5/2 was rounded down to 2 but will now be 2.5 and 2*4 will be the integer 8 and not the floating-point number 8.0. Division values are the only ones changed. For the rest only strict comparisons (=== and !==) will be affected leaving the values unchanged. [9][10]
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 17 April. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 18 April. It will be on all wikis from 19 April (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 17 April at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 18 April at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
The new PDF renderer could not create PDFs from books. Books are in this case collections of pages on a Wikimedia wiki. PediaPress will take over development of the books-to-PDF function. [11]
Pywikibot will no longer support Python 2.7.2 and 2.7.3. [12]
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
The iOS and Android apps now have synced reading lists. This means you can save articles to a private list that can be seen on your other devices if you use the apps.
The visual editor and the 2017 wikitext ask you to write an edit summary after you press Publish. This button now also shows an ellipsis. This is to show that pressing Publish is not the last step. [14]
Changes later this week
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 24 April. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 25 April. It will be on all wikis from 26 April (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 24 April at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 25 April at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
<mapframe> will come to most Wikipedias in May. This means that you can put interactive maps in the articles. Nine Wikipedias that use a strict version of flagged revisions will not get this feature in May. [15]
The rollback function could change. This was a German community request. All editors with rollback rights can leave feedback on the proposed solution. The last day to leave feedback is 4 May (UTC).
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
The parameter for unpatrolled edits in recent changes filters changed name. You might need to update saved filters and links. [16]
Problems
We are migrating wikis from Tidy to Remex. Because of a bug the 250 wikis which do not yet use Remex were switched on 23 April. This is two months early. This meant that pages with broken wikitext showed wrongly to readers. The bug was undone the next day. You can help fix broken wikitext to avoid this problem when your wiki switches. Tidy will be removed on all wikis before July 2018. You can follow the process on Phabricator. [17]
When an administrator blocks someone they will have a calendar they can use to choose when the block ends. This is to make it easier to pick a specific date. [19]
You can soon turn on the Performance Inspector in the Editing section in your preferences. It shows information about the performance of pages. This could be the size of modules in the page, how many CSS selectors are defined on the page and how many are used, or the size of the images on the page. This tool is intended to help editors fix pages that load slowly. [20]
There is a new abuse filter function called equals_to_any. You can use it to check if its first argument is equal (===) to any of the following ones. For example you can use it to check if the page's namespace is amongst a given set of values in a more compact way than you could earlier. You can read more on mediawiki.org.
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 1 May. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 2 May. It will be on all wikis from 3 May (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 1 May at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 2 May at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
The Wikimedia Cloud Services team is working on a new project called Toolhub. The goal is to make it easier for Wikimedians to discover software tools they can use. You can leave feedback on the talk page or email jharewikimedia.org to leave private feedback.
All wikis with fewer than 100 high-priority linter errors in all namespaces will switch to use the Remex parsing library. This is to replace Tidy. It will happen on 2 May. Other wikis will be recommended to switch soon when they have fixed the errors that must be fixed. Wikibooks wikis with fewer than 100 high-priority linter errors in the main namespace will switch on 9 May. Tidy will be removed on all wikis before July 2018. [21][22][23]
The second round of the 2018 WikiCup has now finished. Most contestants who advanced to the next round scored upwards of 100 points, but two with just 10 points managed to scrape through into round 3. Our top scorers in the last round were:
Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with three featured articles
Iazyges, with nine good articles and lots of bonus points
Yashthepunisher, a first time contestant, with two featured lists
SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with seventeen good topic articles
Usernameunique, a first time contestant, with fourteen DYKs
Muboshgu, a seasoned competitor, with three ITNs and
Courcelles, another first time contestant, with twenty-seven GARs
So far contestants have achieved twelve featured articles between them and a splendid 124 good articles. Commendably, 326 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2018 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met; most of the GARs are fine, but a few have been a bit skimpy.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
The Wikimedia Commons mobile app has a new version. It is now easier to find nearby places that need pictures. It helps you with direct uploads and title and category suggestions. The app only works on Android phones. [24]
Problems
The abuse filters had a problem with blocks where you had changed how long they last. It used the default length everywhere. This was in late April. Abuse filter users should make sure the right block length is used and change them if needed. This is only for filters where how long blocks last had been changed. [25]
Changes later this week
The advanced search function beta feature will be on all Wikimedia wikis. It makes it easier to use some of the special search functions that most editors don't know exist. [26]
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 8 May. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 9 May. It will be on all wikis from 10 May (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 8 May at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 9 May at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
All wikis with fewer than 100 high-priority linter errors in the main namespace will switch to use the Remex parsing library. This is to replace Tidy. It will happen on 16 May. Other wikis will switch soon when they have fixed the errors that must be fixed. Tidy will be removed on all wikis before July 2018. [27][28]
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
The new Advanced Search interface is now available as a Beta Feature on all wikis. This makes it easier to learn about and to use many of the powerful options in our search. Feedback is appreciated. [29]
Changes later this week
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 15 May. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 16 May. It will be on all wikis from 17 May (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 16 May at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
In the mobile view, warnings for when something is wrong with a page are not as clear as they should be. The developers are working on this. You can give feedback and suggestions.
The developers are working on making the Wikipedia Android app available in more languages. You can give feedback, suggestions and help test it. Read more on mediawiki.org[30]
If you have any suggestions regarding my rather new hobby of closing or relisting AFd's please leave your feed back in this thread. I will try my best to factor the feedback into my editing pattern.
Hi, FR, without any comments on any particular relist, it may be prudential for you to skim through
Hi, this looked to me like a controversial NAC closure. The opinions were equally split (5/5) and I felt that the "keep" arguments were on the weak side. In any case, with an even split it was not "Most people agree...". Would you mind undoing the close so that it could be closed by an admin? --K.e.coffman (talk) 23:23, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes later this week
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 22 May. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 23 May. It will be on all wikis from 24 May (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 23 May at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
It could become easier to reference different pages of a book in an article. You can give feedback. The last day for feedback is 27 May.
Hi FR30799386! You created a thread called Renominating an Afd at
archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
You can now use global preferences on most wikis. This means you can set preferences for all wikis at the same time. Before this you had to change them on each individual wiki. Global preferences will come to the Wikipedias later this week. [31][32]
It is now easier for blocked mobile users to see why they were blocked. [33]
There is now a checkbox on Special:ListUsers to let you see only users in temporary user groups. [34]
Some rare invisible Unicode characters have recently been banned from page titles. This includes soft hyphens (U+00AD) and left-to-right (U+2066) and right-to-left (U+2067) isolate markers. Existing pages with these characters will soon be moved by a script. [35]
There's a new Wikimedia Foundation team to support the Wikimedia technical communities. It's called the Technical Engagement team. Most of the team members did similar work in other teams before this. [36]
Problems
Some translatable pages are showing old translations instead of latest ones. The cause of this issue has been fixed. We will update all pages automatically to show the latest translations. [37]
Changes later this week
There will be a new special page named PasswordPolicies. This page gives information about the password rules for each user group on that wiki. [38]
A new way to see moved paragraphs in diffs is coming to most wikis. This is to make it easier to find the moved paragraphs and the changes in them. [39]
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 29 May. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 30 May. It will be on all wikis from 31 May (calendar).
Wikis can enable Citoid to provide automatic reference look-up in the visual editor and the 2017 wikitext editor. This is complex. The tool will now disable itself if the configuration isn't correct. It has warned about this in the JavaScript console since February. Check that your wiki is configured correctly. You can ask for help if you need it. [40]
Meetings
You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 29 May at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 30 May at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
Content Translation drafts which have not been updated in over a year will be removed. This allows other users to translate those articles. [41]
A survey is collecting information on what users think about how Wikimedia wiki pages are loaded. This information could be used in future development. [42]
Some wikis will switch to use the Remex parsing library. This is to replace Tidy. It will happen on 30 May and 13 June. Wikis with fewer than 100 linter issues in the main namespace in all high-priority linter categories will switch. This includes Wikidata. Tidy will probably be removed on all wikis in the first week of July. [43][44]
For doc purposes only: this relates to Bedeni Moluar Kotha
You left right as I was about to respond on IRC. :P Unfortunately, the problem text exists in the entire the entire page history, which sorta presents some problems with using
Slakr-I have listed it for rewrite since it does not meet the criterion of G-12. I am pretty sure that no one is going to come forward to rewrite it. — FR+ 11:04, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
PS:Could you RevDel from revid=687725198 till revid=753312324 in Aponjon as a copyvio of [45] ? — FR+ 11:04, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation
For documentation purposes only :Page has been revision deleted after an request by me on IRC.
Nice find in
WP:CV. I'll give you double kudos and a free, virtual serving of shondesh, if you can spot another copyvio in a previous revision of that article, that has yet not been dealt with either. SamSailor
10:17, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Sam Sailor-Couldn't find any. PS:Please take a look at the Deletion Reveiw. — FR+ 06:48, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
I am hereby t-banned from closing deletion discussions until I have participated in 100 Afds with immediate effect. Exceptions include when a article has been clearly speedy deleted. Anymore discussions on the Rana (film) Afd can take place in the relevant section on this t/p — FR+ 08:22, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I request that you undo your "redirect" closure May 17th of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahul Pandita was correctly closed as "keep" but with the comment Consensus obvious no need to wait another day. But the discussion was passed the 168-hour mark.
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unrest was closed as "keep" with the comment Closing 1 day ahead of 7 day deadline as consensus is obvious. Actually only 2 hours 20 minutes were left of the 168 hours.
The community decided a while back that AFD discussions should normally stay open for at least 168 hours (a full 7 days). There are a number of good reasons to comply with this rule. The intricate details of when to
WP:SNOW
is something that should be left to admins and perhaps in a few cases to experienced users. Unrest was not one of these.
WP:RELIST
: a relisted discussion may be closed once consensus is determined without necessarily waiting a further seven days.
speedy keep
, just a "keep".
And one from May 16th:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gargoyle (monster) was correctly closed as "keep" May 16th 06:27:36, and only 30 seconds later you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live in Buenos Aires 1979 as "keep". You may find that some people will suspect you are head counting. This is not a clear keep that should be closed let alone NAC'ed, and the proof is in the fact that the discussion had been relisted by an admin. But it had received no further discussion, and yet you closed it as "keep". Assume that the admin who has been here for six years knows what he is doing when he calls for more discussion by relisting it. Had I been in Onel5969's shoes, I would have asked you to vacate your closure. A much better thing to do in this case is to search for sources, reference the article, flesh it out if possible, and join the discussion in any case.
It is commendable that you want to help out with backoffice tasks, but as
WP:NACD says: If you are not fairly experienced, or are unfamiliar with deletion policy or the workings of deletion discussions, do not close such discussions. Having only participated in five AFD discussions prior to May 23rd, you owe yourself more experience by joining discussions before you start closing them. Regards, SamSailor
15:16, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Sam Sailor-I will reply to these allegations(concerns)(Note:Never edit Wikipedia™ before sleeping ) in detail on Monday(I am on mobile even now)....in short here are the facts...I agree with you that my closure of Rana(film) was incorrect and I allow you to change it to merge and update docs ...With regards to the early closures....It was mainly due to a difference in time zones...The speedy keep...was a accidental press of a button...I later realised that it should have been keep...as for the case of my speed... our house suddenly ran out of internet access while I was doing the same...when we got back access all the actions that I had performed occured almost simultaneously.Thanks — FR+ 15:57, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
I started closing afd's only after two days of observing other editors...I will certainly take your feedback onboard and start closing discussions next month(I .e after two more weeks of observation) — FR+ 15:57, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
No allegations were made, and it is surprising that my advice is taken as such.
I pointed twice to
WP:NACD in my post, and I did that with a purpose. If you had read the very short section in Wikipedia:Deletion process
that NACD redirects to, you would have noticed it says:
Closures may only be reopened by the closer themselves, an uninvolved administrator in their individual capacity, giving their reasoning, or by consensus at deletion review.
and you would not make the suggestion I allow you to change it to merge and update docs.... When people link to project space, please make sure to read and understand it. That you do not, is another sign that you are out of your depth here.
A word of advice that I wish you will take with you in real life: be responsible for your mistakes, do not try to make excuses. The speedy keep...was a accidental press of a button...I later realised that it should have been keep.... But if you did realise it, why did you not correct it? The other excuses, "time zones", "ran out of internet access", well, basically you are not taking responsibility, you are trying to blame shift. Trust me, people here on Wikipedia are generally very forgiving when we make mistakes, we
assume good faith
towards each other, and any editor will recognize your mistakes as such: good faith mistakes. But try the same kind of excuses in a professional work environment, and you will either immediately or eventually find yourself among the unemployed.
The idea that one can start closing afd's only after two days of observing other editors is a naive mistake, but your idea that you can start closing discussions next month(I .e after two more weeks of observation is just wholly unrealistic.
XFDCloser will look for <!-- Please do not remove or change this AfD message)(?:.|\n)*?}}(?:(?:.|\n)+this\ point --> when closing an AFD. Since
WP:AFD/AI. Let me know, if you have any questions. SamSailor
05:44, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Sam SailorDone - Let me know, if you have any questions — FR+ 06:35, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Closure of the AFD was correct. The implementation of the outcome was not. Can Wikipedia:Non-admin closure be helpful? SamSailor 10:55, 28 May 2018 (UTC) (P.S. Is it logical to hat the TOC on this talk page?)
Well... According to the above mentioned page I had to slap templates on
Good thinking - now please implement it without further ado. SamSailor 05:05, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
WP:IAR instead of jumping through the hoops once more. I mean okay I learnt a lesson but doing the same stuff over and over again seems stretching it a bit too far. I seriously think we can move on from this — FR+
05:13, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
This is getting overboard because you refuse to follow procedure and are arguing ad nauseam.
Had you correctly reopened and closed the AFD Monday, this would have been a done deal. You did not. I have gradually given you shorter and shorter instructions. Either you neglect to read or do not understand the project space links I have spoonfed you. And that's okay as well, you will learn little by little by participating.
But when you do not have the experience to do certain tasks, do not understand basic procedures, do not understand the janitorial role of the closer determining consensus at AFD, then please just do as suggested.
The consensus was to merge, but you continue implementing a redirect, Special:Diff/843296933/843297649, and that was not consensus.
Here I what you should do:
Make sure you are logged in on a PC, this procedure can be tricky on a tablet or a smartphone.
Since you do not have the rollback right, but do have Twinkle installed, open up Special:Diff/840321295/841651025 in a new window or tab.
In the left half of the window you should see "Revision as of 2018-05-09T03:46:59". Above it you should see "[restore this version]". Click "[restore this version]".
Replace the entire AFD template, that is <!-- Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled -->
{{AfDM|page=Rana (film) (2nd nomination)|year=2018|month=May|day=9|substed=yes|origtag=afdx|help=off}}
<!-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point --> with {{Afd-merge to|Kochadaiiyaan|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rana (film) (2nd nomination)|28 May 1018}}
At the top of the page paste {{Afd-merge from|Rana (film)|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rana (film) (2nd nomination)|28 May 1018}}
Finally save the page by clicking "Publish change", and you are done.
Can we wrap this up now without more excuses? SamSailor 10:01, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Sam Sailor-I am not commenting on the above based on the assumption that you were angry. I have done whatever you have specified above and then reverted back to the redirect. Please note that I did not implement consensus of the Afd in my last edit. — FR+ 10:45, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
BTW...The reason why I am redirecting the page repeatedly is because the nom of the Afd thanked me when I closed it as a redirect [[46]] and I know that the nom knows more about Indian films than me — FR+ 10:45, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
The MonoBook skin has been optimised for mobile devices. It now looks different. [47]
Redirect links in Special:WhatLinksHere now link to the original page and not the target page. This was done earlier and changed the used messages on some pages. This was a problem for wikis that customized the message. A new change fixed this by using the old messages with one more parameter for customization. Wikis that already changed their customized messages will have to move the customization back again. [50]
Problems
You will not be able to edit some wikis between 06:00 and 06:30 UTC on 13 June. You can see if your wiki is one of them.
MassMessage did not work 24–28 May. This is also why last week's Tech News was late. [51]
Changes later this week
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 5 June. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 6 June. It will be on all wikis from 7 June (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 5 June at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 6 June at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
So I saw your AfD submission and was going to ask the admins to remove you, but a clickthrough to your userpage and the blocklogs indicates that you aren't blocked, making me very glad that I checked.
I was just wondering why you went for the strikethrough given that it indicates being blocked.
Nosebagbear-I don't know of a such a rule...It was just a sort of indication that I intend to be unavailable or very sparsely active for the following week. Now that you have told me about it I'll just go and change the main sig file and remove those styles. — FR+ 11:22, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
FR30799386 - there certainly isn't a rule, you can keep it like that if you find it interesting. It's just that a common gadget you can turn on marks blocked users with a strikethrough. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:27, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Nah, I decided that I am better of without it — FR+ 11:33, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
In the Wikipedia app for Android or iOS users can create reading lists. The reading lists can be seen on different devices if you are logged in to your account. There is now a browser extension so you can add pages to your reading list from a web browser. At the moment it works with Firefox and Chrome. [54]
There is a new version of Pywikibot. Pywikibot is a tool to automate tasks on MediaWiki wikis. [55]
Problems
The MonoBook skin was changed to make it work better for mobile users. This caused some problems. The change was rolled back to fix them. The new version is now back on the wikis. MonoBook users can opt out from the new responsive design. [56]
Changes later this week
The new filters for edit review tools and interface for watchlists will leave beta. For most wikis this will happen on 18 June. For the rest it will happen on 25 June. [57][58]
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 12 June. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 13 June. It will be on all wikis from 14 June (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the Readers Web team IRC office hour. There you can discuss tools to contribute on the mobile web for the existing MediaWiki skins. The meeting will be on 18 June at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 12 June at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 13 June at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Syntax highlighting has been a beta feature on Wikimedia wikis with text written from left to right. It is now a normal feature. It is based on CodeMirror. [59]
Changes later this week
There is no new MediaWiki version this week.
Meetings
You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 19 June at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 20 June at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
Some old web browsers will not be able to read the Wikimedia wikis. This is because they use an insecure way to connect to them. This means that we get less security for everyone else too. This affects about 0.08% of all traffic to the Wikimedia wikis. This affects for example those who read Wikipedia on a PlayStation 3. [60][61]
The new filters for edit review tools and interface for watchlists will leave beta. Because there is no new MediaWiki version this week it will happen on 25 June for most wikis. For the rest it will happen in early July. [62][63]
The third round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
Courcelles, a first time contestant, with 1756 points, a tally built largely on 27 GAs related to the Olympics
Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three GAs on natural history and astronomy topics
SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with a variety of submissions related to transport in the state of Washington
Contestants managed 7 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 120 good articles, 1 good topic, 124 DYK entries, 15 ITN entries, and 132 good article reviews. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 458 GA reviews, in comparison to 244 good articles submitted for review and promoted. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process; several submissions, particularly in abstruse or technical areas, have needed additional work to make them completely verifiable.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
The database for tags will be changed. This will happen on 2 July on French Wikipedia and 9 July on all other wikis. Please report if recent changes get slower or you can't save edits. This could especially affect editors who use the database on ToolForge. [65]
Problems
Last week's MediaWiki update was rolled back. This was because of a database problem. [66]
Changes later this week
There is no new MediaWiki version this week.
Meetings
You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 3 July at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 4 July at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
WebM video files have smaller file size but still be of the same quality. Creating WebM files will take longer time. [67]
The new filters for edit review tools and interface for watchlists will leave beta. This was supposed to already have happened but was delayed. For most wikis this will happen on 9 July. For the rest it will happen on 16 July. [68]
When you rolled back an edit it could get both the Rollback and Undo tags. This has been fixed. [70]
Rollbacks from autopatrolled users were not marked as patrolled. This has been fixed. [71]
Changes later this week
When you edit a link in the visual editor there will be two separate buttons to change which page the link goes to (target) or its text (label). [72][73]
On the mobile version you can find a link to an editor's contributions from their user page. Now this will work even if they haven't created a user page. [74]
When you edit a discussion on the mobile version you sometimes get your signature automatically added. This will now not happen if you have already added a signature manually. This is to avoid double signatures. [75]
When you look at Wikimedia code in Gerrit there will be a new interface. It is on by default for new users. This is also true for developers. This is to make it easier to understand what is happening. [77]
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 10 July. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 11 July. It will be on all wikis from 12 July (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 10 July at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 11 July at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
Today all administrators can edit CSS and JavaScript for the entire wiki. There will be a new user group for editing CSS and JavaScript. Administrators will no longer automatically be able to do this. This is because it is a security risk when all administrator accounts can edit JavaScript even if they never plan to or do not know how it works. You can read more. [78]
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
You can now see a new log of pages being created at Special:Log/create. It includes pages which are later deleted. It is now available on all Wikimedia wikis except Commons and Wikidata. [81]
You can see how many pageviews a wiki had from specific countries. The Wikistats2 maps have now been updated. [82]
Changes later this week
Your watchlist will show changes from the last seven days instead of three. If you have already set a length preference it will not change. [83]
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from July 17. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from July 18. It will be on all wikis from July 19 (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on July 17 at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on July 18 at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
Some articles have messages to readers about problems with the article. For example that it does not cite sources or might not be neutral. Readers do not see these messages on the mobile version. The developers now want to show them. You can read more and leave feedback.
You can use <inputbox> to create search boxes for specific pages. For example to search the archives of a community discussion page. Instead of prefix:Page name you will see a text that explains which pages are being searched. You can read more and leave feedback.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
When you log in to your account you can choose to keep being logged in. This checkbox now works better than before on the mobile version for users without JavaScript. [84]
Wikis that use
Swedish public service radio. More will come. Others could use this to add news sites in other languages in the future. [85]
Editors can do max 90 edits per minute. This is new since last month. This does not affect bots or administrators. [86]
Changes later this week
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 24 July. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 25 July. It will be on all wikis from 26 July (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 25 July at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
The design on Special:Log has changed. It will change again soon. Developers are working on fixing problems. [87]
Problems
Deployment of 1.32.0-wmf.13 has been partially delayed. All deployments have been resumed and successfully done after bug fixes. [88][89]
Deployment of 1.32.0-wmf.14 has been partially delayed. [90][91]
Changes later this week
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 31 July. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 1 August. It will be on all wikis from 2 August (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 31 July at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 1 August at 15:00 (UTC) as well as at 23:00 (UTC). See how to join.
go through Narada sting operation and check whether you can improve the prose or other aspect(s) any further:) A GA review might be in order........ At any case, I was wishing for a digital collage of all the accused but regrettably, many of the accused don't have a picture either at en-wiki or at Commons.Any ideas?
P.S.--Have you seen any recently-published scholarly-book on Indian political scapes that has touched the sting?~
Winged Blades of Godric - I'll take a look in far more detail on Thursday. However, try to avoid CS1 errors and bare links wherever possible. — FR+ 11:55, 31 July 2018 (UTC) reping — FR+ 11:56, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
This is a very active project. We are in the process of completely revamping the entire portal system, and cleaning up the portal namespace. After these are done, we'll be greatly expanding the collections of portals.
We have a newsletter, that covers the progress of portal development, and the latest toys.
By the way, I'm very interested in what you think of portals. What do you like most about them? What do they lack that they should have? What can't they do, that you would like them to be able to do?
I look forward to your replies. — The Transhumanist 08:14, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
The MediaWiki version that was released two weeks ago was late to some Wikimedia wikis. This was because of bugs. It was on all wikis 30 July. [93][94]
Changes later this week
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 7 August. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 8 August. It will be on all wikis from 9 August.
Meetings
You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 7 August at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 8 August at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
To keep you charged up in the cleaning up work that you have been doing recently. Good work. DBigXray 11:56, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
adding
Wikipedia:REFILL to your WP:SKIN will make your job easier. Do try it. --DBigXray
11:58, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Reply
Thank you for your posts. I'm not interested only in church articles. I'm involved all kind of articles in Wikipedia. Most of the are related to India, my country. It has places, churches, institutions etc. I didn't try for a biased editing. I think that articles are needed because I think Wikipedia is not only for articles of such as things have great history and features, but also for small places and institutions. They have only small things to say comparing to others. So we can't say that it is not needed. It have only a small data in internet so we can't say that it is not existed or biased. That have sources in books and publications. Sometimes they haven't ISBN or international accept. So kindly please understand about that articles and keep it in Wikipedia. So kindly don't see me as biased editor.--PATH SLOPU (Talk) 16:19, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
conflict of interest guidelines. On a side note having conflict of interest is not something bad, in fact almost every editor has his/her own area of conflict of interest which he/she tries to avoid (even I do). If you have any more doubts you are free to ask. Regards. — FR+
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
CSS in templates can now be stored in a separate page on all wikis. This is called TemplateStyles. This is to make it easier to edit how templates look. [95]
Changes later this week
There is no new MediaWiki version this week.
Meetings
You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 14 August at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 15 August at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
The developers are planning more ways to block users. This could be blocking someone from just a page or a namespace. You can read more. You can leave feedback on the talk page. [96]
Discussions are underway on the design of a portal tool (user script) that will hopefully have features for modifying portals at the click of a menu item, to make editing them easier. It might do things like change the color for you, add to a selection, add a new section, move a section, and so on.
If you'd like to be involved and suggest features for the tool, please join us at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Portals/Design#What would you want a portal tool to be able to do?
.
Progress report: upgrade of portals
As new portal components are built by our Lua gurus, those components are being used to upgrade portals. Each component automates a section of a portal in a particular way.
The sections that are mostly upgraded so far are the Intro, and the Associated Wikimedia section.
The sections currently undergoing upgrade are: Selected image, Categories, and the Intro.
The Intro? Isn't that done already?
Yes, and no.
The upgrade of the excerpt in intros is mostly complete (there are about 70 non-standard portals that still need it).
Now we are doing another upgrade of intros in the form of adding a panoramic picture at the top of the intro, on portals for which such a picture is available on Commons:. Dozens of panoramas have been added so far, and they are really starting to affect the look of portals — the portals that have them look really good.
Regions are the most likely subjects to have panoramas, but a surprising number of other subjects have banner-shaped pictures too. Some examples of non-geographic portals that they have been added to are:
Speaking of pictures, several hundred Selected image sections have been upgraded to include image slideshows.
Progress report: design
The push for automation continues, with new components under continuous testing in the field. As problems are spotted, they are reported to our programmers, who have done a fantastic job of keeping up with bug reports and fixing the relevant Lua modules fast. I am highly impressed.
Construction time on new portals is now down to as little as a minute or less. Though not in general. If you are lucky enough to spot portals that fit the profile of the new tools (their strengths), then a portal can be complete almost as soon as it is created, with the added time it takes to find and add a panorama. Source page titles are not generally standardized, and so it source pages in many cases must be entered manually. Where source page titles follow a standard naming convention, portal creation for those subjects goes quickly.
So, we still have some hurdles, but the outlook on portals is very good. New features, and many improvements to features are on the horizon. I'll be sure to report them when they become available.
What will the portal of the future look like? That is up to you!
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes later this week
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 21 August. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 22 August. It will be on all wikis from 23 August (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 22 August at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
The 2018 Community Wishlist Survey begins on 29 October. The survey decides what the Community Tech team will work on. You can post proposals from 29 October to 11 November. You can vote on proposals from 16 November to 30 November.
Legacy JavaScript global variables have been deprecated for seven years. They will soon be removed from all wikis. Gadgets and scripts that use them will stop working. You can test your community's gadgets on "group0" wikis. For example Test Wikipedia or mediawiki.org. The legacy JavaScript global variables are already disabled there. You can read the migration guide to fix old scripts. [97]
I think you edited logged out when this edit was made. The edit originally had an IP address. I changed the IP address to your username and then suppressed the edit and the IP address so others can not see your IP. If I was wrong let me know and I will revert myself. ~ GB fan 12:44, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
GB fan - It was me. Sorry for the inconvenience caused . — fr+ 12:46, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Not a problem. I happened to see it and was able to fix it. If you edit logged out in the future, you can fix the signature yourself and if you want the IP address hidden you can email
oversight and someone will take care of removing the IP address. I just happened to be in the right place at the right time. The quicker the edit signature is fixed the easier the suppression of the edits is. ~ GB fan
Myself and others have been testing and experimenting with the new components in upgrading existing portals and in building new portals. They have now been applied in hundreds of portals.
The templates are ready for general use for portal creation.
They are still a bit buggy, but the only way we are going to work the rest of the bugs out is by using them and reporting the bugs as we come across them.
I look forward to seeing what new portals you create!
Placing a panorama (banner picture) at the top of the intro section is a nice touch, and really makes a portal look good. {{box portal skeleton}} doesn't automatically insert panoramas. So, you will need to do that by hand. They can be found at Commons:. For some examples, check out Portal:Sharks, Portal:Cheese, and Portal:Florence
Check the In the news and Did you know? sections for mismatches. That is, sometimes entries come up that shouldn't be displayed. If there are any, refine the search strings further, so they don't return such results.
Finish each portal you've created before creating a new one. We don't want unfinished portals sitting around.
@Amankadd:- Go ahead and do it..Only this time update the |title= part — fr+ 08:35, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Thank You for the approval. I have updated the relevant information link — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amankadd (talk • contribs) 08:38, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
WP:UAA
reports on users with no edits
Generally, there is no reason to report usernames with no edits whatsoever. Per
WP:UAAI
: "Wait until the user edits. Do not report a user that hasn't edited unless they are clearly a vandal. We do not want to welcome productive editors with a report at UAA, nor do we want to waste our time dealing with accounts that may never be used." The exceptions are obvious hate speech or names that attack a living person/Wikipedia editor, those are blockable even without any edits, but other run-of-the-mill violations need not be reported unless and until they at least attempt to edit, and you should be able to clearly explain what the problem is if it is not immediately evident.
For whatever reason, every day dozens, if not hundreds of accounts are created that never make one single edit. It is our responsibility as admins to conscientiously review every report a user makes at UAA, so we have to check for contribs, deleted contribs, and tripping of the edit filter for every one of these reports, only to find out there's nothing there and therefore no problem to be solved. So we add the {{
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
You can now see moved paragraphs in diffs in the mobile view. It also works on all languages in the desktop view. [98]
Bureaucrats on all Wikimedia wikis can now remove the interface admin user right. [99]
Problems
Some diffs show lines in the wrong order. The developers are working on fixing it. [100]
Changes later this week
The message you see when you thank a user will change. This is to make it easier to understand. [101]
AWB will stop adding using AWB in the edit summary. Instead it will add a tag that says AWB. [102]
Some abuse filter variables have changed. They are now easier to understand for non-experts. The old variables will still work but filter editors are encouraged to replace them with the new ones. You can find the list of changed variables on mediawiki.org. They have a note which says Deprecated. Use ... instead. An example is article_text which is now page_title. [103]
Abuse filters can now use how old a page is. The variable is page_age. [104]
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 28 August. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 29 August. It will be on all wikis from 30 August (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 28 August at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 29 August at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
Because of a data centre test you will be able to read but not edit the wikis for up to an hour on 12 September and 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time. The time when you can't edit might be shorter than an hour. You can read more about this.
Hello, FR30799386. You have new messages at Path slopu's talk page. Message added 14:21, 29 August 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Please see my talk page. PATH SLOPU (Talk) 14:21, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
The fourth round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The eight users who made it to the final round had to score a minimum of 422 points to qualify, with the top score in the round being 4869 points. The leaders in round 4 were:
Courcelles scored a magnificent 4869 points, with 92 good articles on Olympics-related themes. Courcelles' bonus points alone exceeded the total score of any of the other contestants!
Kees08 was second with 1155 points, including a high-scoring featured article for Neil Armstrong, two good topics and some Olympics-related good articles.
Cas Liber, with 1066 points, was in third place this round, with two featured articles and a good article, all on natural history topics.
During round four, 6 featured articles and 164 good articles were promoted by WikiCup contestants, 13 articles were included in good topics and 143 good article reviews were performed. There were also 10 "in the news" contributions on the main page and 53 "did you knows". Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on
Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best editor win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
There is a new user right for users who can edit CSS and JavaScript for the entire wiki. Before this all admins could edit CSS and JavaScript. This was a security risk. This group is called interface administrators. Administrators can delete user CSS and JavaScript pages. [105][106]
There will be an A/B test on the Wikipedia mobile website. It starts this week. It tests how we show templates that show information about an article. The test will last two weeks. [107][108]
You can now use different CSS rules for different skins when you edit templates. This is because of TemplateStyles. [109]
You can get a notification when a link is made to a page you created. This has not worked since June. It was fixed last week. [113]
Changes later this week
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 4 September. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 5 September. It will be on all wikis from 6 September (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 5 September at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
The Wikimedia Foundation Readers department will work on advanced mobile editing. You can read more about this and other things they plan to work on over the next year. You can also see the presentation.
As you know, portals are now supported by a number of new templates, which are in turn supported by some new
Lua modules
.
Those templates and modules are being put to the test, in the new portals that have been created since this WikiProject rebooted, plus a number of existing portals that have been revamped.
Please browse the new portals at your leisure, and report any and all problems that you spot. Post bug and other portal problem reports at
WT:WPPORTD
. Please report bugs, quirks, awkward aspects, or anything weird or off that you notice. Compliments and suggestions are also welcome. :)
When you report a bug, please indicate the portal's name, the section that the problem appeared in, and the name of the article appearing (first) in the section with the problem. Most problems will likely be encountered in the Selected general articles" section, due to quirks in a displayed article's wikicode that the lua modules don't handle yet. Your help in spotting those is of utmost value. Thank you.
Don't delete portal subpages just yet
For portals that have been converted to the single-page design, we are not deleting their subpages at this time, because we are working on ways to harvest the data from those pages. For example, the Selected picture subpages include filenames and captions that would be valuable for the image slideshows. Please don't delete portal subpages, for now. They'll be slated for d-batch speedy deletion after harvesting. Thank you.
Development notes
We are currently testing a feature added to {{Transclude files as random slideshow}} that allows it to accept both sourcepages and filenames. Courtesy of Evad37. This will pave the way for harvesting files and their captions from portal subpages, for use in image slideshows.
We need your help
The bulk of the work is being done by a handful of editors. But we can't do it all. We need help with spotting bugs, refining the search parameters in new/revamped portals (in the "Did you know..." and "In the news" sections), adding images to slideshows for a broader selection (they default to showing the images on the root article page but are capable of showing so much more), adding panoramic pictures at the top of the intro section of region portals (cities, counties, states, provinces, countries, continents, and other regions), to name but a few task types.
It is rewarding to be a part of the growing portal phenomenon. And you get to see its expansion and refinement up close.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
When you added or edited a template with the visual editor the input boxes were very big. This has been fixed. The input boxes will now be smaller until you click on them. Then they will change size to fit the text. [115]
Problems
Some diffs showed lines in the wrong order. This was fixed last week. [116]
Marking a cross-wiki notification as read didn't work every time. The other wiki was not updated. This has now been fixed. [117]
<maplink> did not work for a few days. This was because of a bug. This has now been fixed. [118]
{{subst:REVISIONUSER}} is used by some templates. For a period edits saved with {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} would save the previous user's name and not your username. This is now fixed. Edits made before the bug was fixed will still be wrong and need to be corrected. [119]
When you move a page the title still shows the old page name. The developers are working on fixing this. [120]
Changes later this week
Because of a data centre test you will be able to read but not edit the wikis for up to an hour on 12 September and 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time. The time when you can't edit might be shorter than an hour. You can read more about this.
Because of the data centre test there will be no new version of MediaWiki this week. Changes for this week will come next week instead.
Meetings
You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 11 Septmber at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 12 September at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Hello, FR30799386. It has been over six months since you last edited the
Trinetra scam
".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission
and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
this link
. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. SamSailor 06:17, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Sam Sailor The last time I checked, it still had not passed the notability guidelines comfortably enough for me to create an article on it (It is on the borderline of notability). Would it be okay if it were userfied to me? Ping @Fastily: as the deleting admin. — fr+ 11:46, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
The Wikimedia Commons mobile app has a new version. Images uploaded using Nearby are now automatically added to the associated Wikidata item. You can browse other images on Commons. You can see your achievements and your upload statistics. It has also fixed some bugs. [121]
MediaWiki web requests now have a time limit of 60 seconds for GET requests and 200 seconds for POST requests. [122]
Problems
You could not see the menu on the notifications page on the mobile version. This has now been fixed. [123]
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 18 September. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 19 September. It will be on all wikis from 20 September (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 19 September at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
A {{Portal}} box in the See also section of the corresponding root article for each portal. If there is no See also section, create one and place the portal template in that. (Rather than placing them in an external links section -- they're not external links).
A {{Portal}} template placed at the top of the category page corresponding to each portal.
Nearly 2,000 of the new portals need to be listed here.
They can be found at
Portal talk:Contents/Portals#These are not listed yet
. Instructions are included there.
Customized Portal Rating system is now in place
Portals now have a new rating system of their own designed specifically to support portal evaluation! We were trying to use the standard assessment system for articles, but that doesn't fit portals very well.
The new system can be found at the top of all portal talk pages, in the WikiProject portals box. Those with "???" ratings need to be assessed, which makes up most of the older portals.
Most of the new portals were started out with an initial "Low" level of importance when their talk pages were created. Those deserving higher importance should be promoted as you come across them.
Improving the new portals
The starting point for new portals included minimal parameters and content, in the form of default values in the template(s) used for their creation.
Embellishing embedded search strings
So, for the search strings in the "Did you know..." and "In the news" sections, this was the magic word {{PAGENAME}}, which represents the portal's name. Unfortunately, the resulting term is alway capitalized, which limits its effectiveness as a search string for anything but proper nouns. Results for those two sections can be improved, by replacing the "PAGENAME" magic word with multiple search strings, and search strings that begin with lower case letters. There is no inherent limit as to how many search parameters may be included. Lua search notation is used. The more general the subject, the more subtopic search terms you may want to include. For example, on Portal:Avengers (comics), {{PAGENAME}} turned up nothing. But, when more parameters were added, as in the wikicode below...
{{Transclude selected recent additions | {{PAGENAME}} | Iron Man | Spiderman | Antman | Hawkeye | The Hulk | Incredible Hulk | David Banner | Captain America | Scarlet Witch | Black Widow | Tony Stark | Nick Fury | Age of Ultron | Infinity War | months=36 | header={{Box-header colour|Did you know... }}|max=6}}
... that returned several results in the portal's DYK section.
Be sure you make the improvements to both the DYK section and the "In the news" section, as they both require the search strings.
Expanding the slideshow contents
The default starting selection for the image slideshow in most new portals is whatever images happen to be in the corresponding root article (via the PAGENAME magic word). You can improve image slideshows by adding more sourcepages and filenames as parameters in the "Selected images" section of portals.
Portals used to take about 6 hours or more to create. Now, for subjects that have particular navigation support, we've got that down to about one minute each, with even more content displayed than ever. True, that means the new portals pick you, rather than the other way around. Creating a specific portal that doesn't happen to have the requisite navigation support is still pretty time consuming. But, we are working on extending our reach beyond the low-hanging fruit.
And efforts are ongoing to keep shaving time off of the creation process. Eventually, we may get it down to seconds each.
In addition to improving automation, we're always looking for new features and improvements that we can add to portals, and there is plenty of potential to expand on the standard design so that new portals are even better right out of the starting gate. Additional designs are also possible.
On the horizon, there are many more portals waiting to be created. And we can expect to see at least a few more section types emerge. I never expected slideshows, for example, especially not for excerpts. Who knows where innovation will take us next?
If you like, you can join this wikiproject. Please help to make it a good wikiproject. Thank you--PATH SLOPU (Talk) 15:32, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Path slopu Sorry, I will have to decline your invitation. I am not really knowledgeable about Kollam in particular though I try to my best to edit and keep certain topics relating to India in shape. — fr+ 11:15, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 25 September. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 26 September. It will be on all wikis from 27 September (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 26 September at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Path slopu has given you batteries! Batteries promote WikiLove (📖💞) and hopefully this one has made your day more powerful. It is the power source best preferred by bots. 🤖 Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else batteries, whether it be someone you have had robot wars with in the past or a good friend.
This batteries are for FRadical Bot to boost its efforts in contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you for your valuable efforts. Thank you.--PATH SLOPU (Talk) 12:59, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Spread the goodness of batteries by adding {{subst:Batteries for you}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
Path slopu Thank you . I'll certainly use them to charge up the bot. — fr+ 05:21, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Technical Barnstar
This is for your valuable contributions and efforts in the technical area like bot building, AWB, etc. Thank you for your help. PATH SLOPU (Talk) 13:44, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Ordinary pages can no longer be loaded as javascript. You could do this using ?action=raw&ctype=text/javascript in the URL. Only fully protected pages in the MediaWiki: namespace or user javascript subpages can be loaded as javascript now. This is for better security. [126][127]
Problems
New and updated translations from translatewiki.net will not reach the wikis for a while. You can still translate messages on translatewiki.net. The Wikimedia wikis will be updated with the new translations later. This is because of work on the translation system. [128][129]
Changes later this week
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 2 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 3 October. It will be on all wikis from 4 October (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 3 October at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
You can join the meeting with the Wikimedia Foundation Search Platform team. The meeting will be on 3 October at 15:00 UTC. See how to join if you want to know how the search function works or have questions.
Future changes
Because of a data centre test you will be able to read but not edit the wikis for up to an hour on 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time. The time when you can't edit might be shorter than an hour. You can read more about this.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
There was a problem when you copied and pasted from a table with the visual editor. It could add href where it shouldn't be. This has now been fixed. [131]
Changes later this week
Because of a data centre test you will be able to read but not edit the wikis for up to an hour on 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time. The time when you can't edit might be shorter than an hour. You can read more about this.
Because of the data centre test there will be no new version of MediaWiki this week. Changes for this week will come next week instead.
Meetings
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 10 October at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
There was also some discussion of creation criteria for portals. The result was that one of the participants in the discussion reverted the portal guidelines to the old version, which has the minimum number of articles for a portal included in there: "about 20 articles", a guideline that was in place since 2009.
Many of the portals that existed prior to April 2018 do not have that many (being limited to however many subpages the portal creator created), and therefore, these portals need to be upgraded to the new design (which automatically provides many articles for display). Using the new design, exceeding 20 articles for display is very easy.
Linking to the new portals
Efforts have been underway to place links to new portals (all 2200 of them created since April).
Link (portal button) from corresponding category pages. Done
Link from See also section on corresponding root articles. Partially implemented
Link from bottom of corresponding templates. Partially implemented
Link for each portal on
Portal:Contents/Portals.
Partially implemented
Your help is needed. It is easy to access the page mentioned in #1, #2, & #3 from the portals themselves.
AWBers could do these tasks even faster (that's how the category pages were done), except #4...
Item #4 above pretty much has to be done by hand. (If you can find a way to speed that up, I would be very impressed). The links needing placement can be found at
Portal talk:Contents/Portals#These are not listed yet
. Instructions are included there.
The conversion effort: news sections
There are still around 1200 old-style portals that have only undergone partial conversion to the new design concepts, still relying on subpages with copied/pasted excerpts that have been going stale for years, out of date (manually posted) news entries, etc.
The section currently being tackled on these is news. You can help by deleting any news section on the old-style portals that has news entries that are years old (that is the dead giveaway to a manual news section). Be sure not to delete the news sections of portals that have up-to-date news, or active maintainers. For maintainers, look at the portal's categories, and/or check the participants list at
WP:WPPORT
.
Eventually, conditional news sections (that appear only when news items are available for display) will be added using AWB to all portals without a news section.
News items (and even the news sections themselves) are automatically generated for portals that were created using the Basic portal start page. On those portals, there is a hidden comment at the top of the page (that you can see in the edit window), that says this:
<!-- This portal was created using subst:Basic portal start page -->
Design development
Presently, we are in the process of implementing the new design features, creating new portals with them, and installing them in existing portals.
But, what about development of new new design features?
We have a wish department.
Post your wishes at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Portals/Design#Discussions about possible cool new features
, and they might come true. Many have already, and for many of those, this is where they were posted.
Cascade effect
A resource that has been elusive so far will be obtained eventually: categories. That is, the ability to pull category member links to populate a page.
Rather than populate portals directly with such links, it may be more beneficial to the encyclopedia to utilize them in navigation footers, because portals already have the ability to generate themselves based on those.
So, this would create a cascade effect: auto-gathering entries from categories, would enable the construction of new navigation footers, that would in turn support the development of new portals.
The cascade effect would also be felt by existing portals, as existing navigation footers could be expanded using the category harvesting methods, which would in turn expand the coverage of portals that access those navigation footers.
You can help by providing leads about any potential category harvesting methods. Please report anything you know about harvesting categories at
WT:WPPORTD
. Thank you.
Looking into the future: the quantum portal?
One idea that has been floating around is the concept of a pageless portal. That is, a portal that isn't stored anywhere, instead being generated when you click on a menu item or button.
Many of the new portals were generated by a single click, and then saved via a second click.
Therefore, it seems likely that the portals of the future will employ the one-click concept.
Because of the need for customization by users, this concept would need to be augmented with a way to integrate user contributions. This could be done in at least two ways: posting an existing portal, autogenerating one from scratch if such does not yet exist, or have a special data page for user contributions that is folded into the auto-generated portal.
How soon? That is up to you. All that is needed are persons to implement it.
Until next time...
Keep up the good work on portals. They are improving daily. Thank you. — The Transhumanist 04:18, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
Some pages, edits and users disappeared for a short while after the server switch. Missing content and users was fixed within a day. Some preferences and other things might take a few more days to fix. [132]
Wikis are updated with new and updated translations from translatewiki.net again. This will happen once a week. The developers are working on fixing the problem so we can have translation updates more often again. [133]
Changes later this week
When you create an abuse filter that prevents edits you can now write a specific error message for it. Before this all abuse filters that prevented edits had the same error message. [134]
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 16 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 17 October. It will be on all wikis from 18 October (calendar).
Meetings
There will be no more meetings with the Editing team. This is because not enough Wikimedians were interested. To tell developers which bugs you think are the most important you can use Phabricator as normal. [135]
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 17 October at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes later this week
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 23 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 24 October. It will be on all wikis from 25 October (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 24 October at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
The Community Wishlist Survey begins on 29 October. The survey decides what the Community Tech team will work on. You can post proposals from 29 October to 11 November. You can vote on proposals from 16 November to 30 November.
Please inspect these portals, report problems or suggest improvements at
WT:WPPORTD
, or develop them further (see below). Thank you.
What's next?
There is still lots to do...
There are many subject gaps that need to be filled. This can be done by creating new portals, or by adding Selected article sections to existing portals. To create a new portal, simply place {{subst:Basic portal start page}} on an empty portal page, and click "Preview". If the portal is complete, click "Save". After you try it, come share your experience and excitement at
WT:WPPORTD
.
Each new portal is just a starting point. Each portal of the new design can be further developed by:
refining the search parameters to improve the results displayed in the Did you know and In the news sections.
adding more specific Selected articles sections, like Selected biographies.
inserting a Recognized content section.
adding more pictures to the image slideshow.
placing a panoramic picture at the top of the intro section (especially for geographic portals).
Besides the new portals, there are still about 1200 portals of the old design that need to be converted to the new design.
Many portals need to be de-orphaned, by placing links to them (in the See also section of the corresponding root articles, at the bottom of the corresponding navigation footer templates, and on the corresponding category pages).
Many of the new portals still need to be listed at
Portal:Contents/Portals
.
Bugs keep popping up in portals. These need to be tracked down and reported at
WT:WPPORTD
.
Tools are needed to make developing and maintaining portals quicker and easier.
Dreaming up new features and capabilities. Innovation needs to continue, to design the portal of tomorrow, and the portal development-maintenance-system of the future. Automation!
So, if you find yourself with a little (or a lot) of free time, pick an area (or more) above and...
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
You can post proposals for the Community Wishlist Survey. The survey decides what the Community Tech team will work on. You can post proposals until 11 November. You can vote on proposals from 16 November to 30 November.
The wikis now have a content security policy report. This means that you might get a warning in your javascript console when you load external resources in your user scripts. For security reasons it is recommended that you don't do this. It might not be possible to load external resources in your scripts in the future. [136]
Problems
Your watchlist can show which changes you have already seen. This did not work for a few days. It has been fixed. [137]
Changes later this week
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 30 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 31 October. It will be on all wikis from 1 November (calendar).
The 2006 wikitext editor is no longer available. It will be removed from Special:Preferences. It has not been the standard editor for a long time. It was replaced by the 2010 wikitext editor. [138][139]
Meetings
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 31 October at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
You can now use TemplateWizard to edit templates. This works only with the 2010 wikitext editor and not in the visual editor or the 2017 wikitext editor. If you click on you can enter the information in a pop-up. You can turn on TemplateWizard in your beta feature preferences. [140]
Changes later this week
You can choose to see edit conflicts in a two-column view. This is a beta feature. You can find it in your preferences. The interface for the two-column edit conflict will change. You can read more.
When you edit with the visual editor you can use the "Automatic" citation tab. This helps you generate citations. You will now be able to write plain text citations or the title of a journal article or a book in this tab. This will search the Crossref and WorldCat databases and add the top result. [141]
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 6 November. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 7 November. It will be on all wikis from 8 November (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 7 November at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Next time you are unwell, be sure to tell us so we can remind you not to nominate articles for AFD! I hope you are feeling better. Jack N. Stock (talk) 09:32, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Jacknstock I am much better now. However, I am still to fully recover. I am still at a loss as to how I missed the names of the schools yesterday despite having checked the list using the Crtl+F function of the browser.Facepalm — fr+ 14:04, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Give a hearty welcome to AmericanAir88, who has adopted working on portals as one of his main purposes on Wikipedia. So far, he has created the following portals:
He has been, and will continue to be, sorely missed.
Hopefully, he is okay, on a Caribbean cruise or something.
The conversion continues
Portals of the old design, are slowly but surely being converted to the new single-page design.
One factor that has slowed things down is that for many sections, the section header call and section contents call are integrated into a template and buried in a lua module, locking them in on each portal. They have been that way for years.
This means that these sections can't be directly edited like the other sections on the same portal. So, search/replaces affect all the sections except those. So, upgrading headers on these portals, for example, misses the integrated sections and inadvertently results in 2 different header colors.
Before we can continue with the upgrade of these portals, the headers and section contents calls need to be restored to each portal, so that those can be edited in concert with the other sections on the portal, and worked on independently of each other.
This is underway, with a solution implemented on about 1/4 of the affected portals so far. Around 300 of them. The remaining 900 should be done within a couple weeks or so.
Going wide...
We now have banner-shaped pictures included in the introduction sections of 180 portals. The rarity of such pictures has made it difficult to find suitably narrow images for display across the tops of portals.
We have a solution for this, courtesy of FR30799386...
Most pictures are not banner-shaped. But, you can still use them as banners. Here's how:
Using both maxheight=120px and overflow=Hidden produces this:
Project's status
There are now 4,140 portals, with more being created almost daily. Prior to this project's reboot, portals were created at about the rate of 80 per year. Since April of this year, we've created about 2,600 new portals, or 32.5 years' worth at the old rate.
Of those new portals, about 3/4 of them need links leading to them. Almost all of them are linked to from the category system, but they still need links in article see also sections, at the bottom of navigation templates, and on the main portals list at
Portal:Contents/Portals
.
Of the 1500 portals created before the reboot, about 300 have been completely converted to the new design so far. About 1100 more have been partially converted, with intros, image slideshows, and associated wikimedia sections getting the most attention.
Discussion has resumed on the portal guidelines.
Until next issue...
See ya round the portal system! — The Transhumanist 11:42, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Some old mobile browsers can use the watchlist again. This has not worked for a while. These browsers are called grade C browsers. This helps for example Windows Phone 8.1 with Internet Explorer and Lumia 535 with Windows 10. [142]
Problems
You can choose to see edit conflicts in a two-column view. This is a beta feature. You can find it in your preferences. Users who use this view saw the edit conflict resolution page when they wanted to see a preview. This has been fixed. [143][144][145]
Changes later this week
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 13 November. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 14 November. It will be on all wikis from 15 November (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 14 November at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
You can use the content translation tool to translate articles. The developers are working on a new version. One of the changes will be a maintenance category. Articles where users add a lot of text from machine translation without changing it will be in that category. This is so the community can review it. The users will also have been warned before they publish the article that it has a lot of unchanged text from machine translations. [146]
When arriving here on User talk:FR30799386 (only available link Talk page), it states "FR30799386 will be taking an indefinite semi-wikibreak from editing.".
Please, could both of these be corrected with up-to-date information. —Sladen (talk) 09:21, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Sladen Thanks for informing me that you were having issues with the operation of my bot. AFAIK, we are not required to link to the BRFA in the edit summary. Additionally, trying to include a link in the edit summary will actually compromises the general readability of the edit summary since I will have to resort to using symbols to reduce the length of my summary(AWB doesn't allow many characters...). With regards to my user talk page, I intend to keep it the way it is, unless you can find a replacement sentence which means "has reduced editing activity to about two to three edits a day when available". If you did read the grey message box underneath and the edit notice of this page, it very clearly states that I am always available to respond to queries with 48 hours latest. Regards. — fr+ 09:43, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Diffs show names of unrelated second bot (MiszaBot), to an unrelated third bot (Lowercase sigmabot III)
No wiki link
No obvious STOP mechanism
Bot Talk page redirects elsewhere
Redirect end point states editor/bot owner is retired
When looking from the outside, these edits look(ed) extremely suspect—perhaps a case of a hijacked account of some retired editor being used to manipulate archives. So yes, the BRFA did not require linking to the task being done, but it is the easy minimum which would make the edits look less suspect, and thus save time and stress all around. Bot edits should be transparent and self-documenting, not obfuscated. —Sladen (talk) 09:56, 14 November 2018 (UTC) (The BRFA was found via a search engine).
Great to see the proactive adjustment in the edit summary at ~09:11–09:12 Special:Diff/868767540/868767738. An incomplete link to ([[Wikipedia:Bots/Reques) does not reveal which BRFA might be relevant. Please consider prioritising the link and moving it to the front to avoid truncation—perhaps space could be saved by replacing "MiszaBot, MiszaBot I,MiszaBot II, MiszaBot III" with "MiszaBot.*". Thank you also for the Special:Diff/865059798/868771474 updates to the User:FRadical Bot. —Sladen (talk) 10:18, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Sladen, Done. Thanks for bringing up the concerns with the bot. I think have resolved adequately both issues that you brought up in your original cmt. If you have any more queries, you are most welcomed to ask them here. — fr+ 10:40, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, FR30799386. Voting in the
2018 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
There is an A/B test for sameAs data. This is to make it easier to find the right information with a search engine. This changes the metadata for a wiki page. It doesn't change how the page looks. [147]
Changes later this week
There is no new MediaWiki version this week.
Meetings
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 21 November at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
The Wikimedia wikis use templates to show readers there are problems with the content on some pages. For example if there are no sources or the page needs to be rewritten. The mobile website will soon show more information when you use these templates. Some templates may need to be updated. [148]
The Education Program extension was removed from all Wikimedia projects. The database tables used by the extension will be archived. This will happen in a month. If you want the information on your wiki you should move it to a normal wiki page. [149]
While I understand that you care about that proposal, it is one of more than 200 proposals, all of them important to some (or many) people, many of them relevant directly or indirectly to enwiki as well. We have general pointers to the wishlist survey, but we don't need hundreds of people all trying to rally votes for their proposal all over the place. I note that the wishlist survey page states "A reasonable amount of canvassing is acceptable. You've got an opportunity to sell your idea to as many people as you can reach. Feel free to reach out to other people in your project, WikiProject or user group. Obviously, this shouldn't involve sockpuppets, or badgering people to vote or to change their vote. But a good-faith "get out the vote" campaign is absolutely okay." However, while they may feel this is a good idea, it isn't, and they have no say on what is acceptable canvassing on enwiki (or elsewhere, but elsewhere is not my concern).
This isn't about spite. When you revert someone next time, take care to make sure that you apply policy uniformly and not on a depending-on-my-mood basis. — fr+ 08:45, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, pardon, but I do not recal having spammed this talk page, or anyone else's for that matter - yet. And if I were to, it would only be to people who are already on mailing lists. 08:52, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
It's not a "depending on my mood" situation. When I revert personal attacks, or copyvio, or delete articles, it usually won't help to claim that I should then also do the same with other pages or edits which may or may not have the same problems, but which I hadn't seen.
Fram, The situation you are referring to doesn't match with today's scenario. There is no readable way you could have overlooked his canvassing while reverting my post. — fr+
, so, you're telling me that I can reinstate the posts provided I use a far more neutral edit summary(something of the type of "new section") ?
No, please don't. Not only was the message itself far from the neutral message you pretend it to be, I also have already explained that having 200 proposals posted on all noticeboards is not what these boards are for.
I would like to note, that I am not pretending anything. There was nothing in the proposal that was out of the line with the canvassing guidelines. However, out of respect for your tenure and experience I will desist from reverting your edit. Additionally, I would prefer that you open a discussion at the relevant noticeboard seeking wider input from the community as to the consensus position on "canvassing" for the Community Wishlist Survey. Regards — fr+ 10:21, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Fram Please open a discussion at the relevant noticeboard so that this issue can be resolved....Is it allowed to canvass or is it disallowed ? — fr+
11:12, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Uninvolved editor here: It was definitely canvassing. You weren’t just notifying people of the proposal, you were actively showing your support of it. The message was clearly written in hopes that people would participate AND support it. You can notify of existence and encourage participation. You cannot encourage support of it. Sergecross73msg me 11:28, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Sergecross73 I guess the words VOTE NOW are extremely appropriate ? — fr+ 11:33, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Sergecross73, What I was telling Fram just above was that we need a clear consensus position with regards to this fact not the whims and fancies of three administrators and one non-admin. — fr+ 11:36, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The problem is that your post literally says:
I would like to invite all interested editors (particularly those who edit from mobile devices) to vote for the proposal to add a revert functionality to the mobile interface, so that a strong message may be sent out to the Wikimedia Foundation and its employees to take its mobile user-base seriously and eventually bring the mobile interface at par with other major websites of the internet.
That wording is very clearly advocating a specific position, not just participation or urgency. Sergecross73msg me 12:32, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
( New portals are created with {{subst:Basic portal start page}} or
{{subst:bpsp}} )
Happy Holidays
Hello everyone! Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice (if it's occurring in your area of the world), and thanks for your work in maintaining, improving, and expanding portals. Cheers, — The Transhumanist 06:51, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
By the way, the above list was generated using
this Petscan query. It can be easily modified by changing the date. The data page (under the Output tab) also has options for receiving the data in CSV or tabbed format, which some operating systems automatically load into a spreadsheet program for ease of use, such as copying and pasting the desired column (like page names).
There seems to be a need to more precisely control color. During the conversion of existing portals to the one-page model, customized colors are being lost.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
On wikis with translatable pages you could create a mess when you moved a page that had translatable subpages. A subpage is when you use / to create a new page: /wiki/Page/Subpage. The subpages would be moved but not the translations. The subpages are no longer automatically be moved. This is to make it safer to move pages. [150]
Changes later this week
The advanced search interface will be available by default on all Wikimedia wikis. It makes it easier to use some of the special search functions that most editors don't know exist. It's already active on German, Farsi, Arabic and Hungarian Wikipedia. [151]
Special:UnusedCategories show empty categories with no files or other categories. You can soon choose to not show soft redirect categories or some maintenance categories there. You can do this with the magic word__EXPECTUNUSEDCATEGORY__. [152]
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 27 November. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 28 November. It will be on all wikis from 29 November (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 28 November at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
The mw.util.jsMessage() function was deprecated in 2012. It will be removed next week. Look for the warningUse of "mw.util.jsMessage" is deprecated in the JavaScript console to know if you use an affected script or gadget. If you are a gadget maintainer you should check if your JavaScript code contains mw.util.jsMessage. There is a migration guide. It explains how to use mw.notify instead. [153]
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Admins will not be able to unblock themselves if they are blocked by someone other than themselves. This is because it can cause damage if someone else takes over an admin account and other admins can't block them. If this is a problem for your community you can report it on Phabricator. You can also ask questions on Meta. There is a discussion on Phabricator about how to solve this if two admins fight with each other on a small wiki. [154]
Small
SVG images are now bigger when you see them in MediaViewer. [155]
You can go to a section from the edit summary by clicking on the section name. Before this you had to click on the arrow. [156]
When you jumped to a footnote that was referenced several times in an article it could be difficult to see where you were in the text. Now there are jump marks and highlights to help you find your way back. [157][158]
For creating an "Undo" button for the mobile editing interface. This will be really helpful when dealing with vandalism, can this code also be used on Wikimedia Commons? Donald Trung (talk) 15:38, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
Donald Trung Thank you..... The script should work in Commons. — fr+ 07:46, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes later this week
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 11 December. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 12 December. It will be on all wikis from 13 December (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 12 December at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
New accounts will need passwords that are at least 8 characters long. Admins, interface admins, bureaucrats, oversighters, CentralNotice admins, global renamers, check users, stewards and some other user groups will need passwords that are at least 10 characters long. This is because an attacker could cause damage to the wikis if they took over these accounts. [159][160]
When you hover over a footnote it will show you the reference as a pop-up. This is so you don't have to jump down to the bottom of the page to see a reference. This will happen in 2019. Some wikis already have gadgets that do this. You will be able to turn it off. [161]
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Tech News
Because of the holidays the next issue of Tech News will be sent out on 7 January 2019.
Recent changes
Some templates that show notices about the content of the page will now be shown on the mobile website. In many cases they were hidden before. [162][163]
Admins can no longer unblock themselves, except for self-blocks. A blocked admin can block the user who blocked them but no one else. This is so no one can block all admins on a wiki without being stopped. [164]
The ParserMigration extension has been removed. It compared the result of two versions of the MediaWiki wikitext parsing pipeline. It was used when we moved to the Remex parsing library instead of Tidy.
Problems
<ref> tags can use parameters such as "name" or "group". For example <ref name="adams" group="books">. If a <ref> tag has more than two parameters all parameters are ignored. You don't get a warning that they don't work. This will soon be fixed. [165]
Changes later this week
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 18 December. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 19 December. It will be on all wikis from 20 December (calendar).
Meetings
You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 19 December at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
The Wikimedia Foundation Android app team are working on making it easier to edit on mobile phones. You can read more about these plans. If you have an Android phone and speak at least two languages you can help testing in English. Tell Dchen (WMF) you want to be part of the testing by writing on her talk page or email her.
tiles.wmflabs.org and wma.wmflabs.org will stop working. They have no maintainers and run an old operating system. Tools which use it could stop working. This includes the mapnik gadget, hill shading, and hike and bike layers. New maintainers could help out and keep it going. [166]
Adequate measures have been taken. — fr+ 09:51, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Regarding this edit; I've temporarily blocked your account to prevent whoever you lent your phone to from editing Wikipedia until they give it back to you, hopefully within the next 24 hours. -- The Anome (talk) 11:52, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.
The Anome, You can unblock, I am in control of the account and the phone. Additionally, could you please delete/oversight that edit(I mean remove all traces of it)? The person(my 17 year old cousin) has been dealt with and given a strong talking to. I will take adequate measures to prevent such an incident in the future. Regards. — fr+ 13:58, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Unblocking. I will also hide the edit. -- 15:14, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Ouch. Well, if the Secret Service come calling, at least you'll know why. — The Transhumanist 13:50, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi FR30799386. Apart from adding your account to the list of Afc reviewers, your account has also been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Minor user rights can now be accorded on a time limited or probationary period, so do check back at
WP:PERM/NPR in case this concerns your application. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page
. In addition, please remember:
usually
not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance. so that they are aware.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Lourdes 03:19, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Last issue, I mentioned there would be a flood, and so, here it is...
Portals status
We now have 4,620 portals.
And the race to pass 5,000 by year's end is on...
Can we make it?
The New Year, and the 5,001st portal, await.
( New portals are created with {{subst:Basic portal start page}} or
{{subst:bpsp}} )
Evad is back!
After disappearing in mid-thread, Evad37 has returned from a longer than expected wikibreak.
Be sure to welcome him back.
Improved cropping is coming to Portal image banner
User:FR30799386 is working on making {{Portal image banner}} even better by enabling it to chop the top off an image as well as the bottom.
Many pictures aren't suitable for banners because they are too tall. Therefor, User:FR30799386 added cropping to this template, so that an editor could specify part of a picture to be used rather than the whole thing.
Upgrade of flagship portals is underway
Work has begun on upgrading Wikipedia's flagship portals (those listed at the top of the
Work continues on the other five. Feel free to join in on the fun.
Spotting missing portals that are redirects
In place of many missing portals, there is a redirect that leads to "the next best topic", such as a parent topic.
Most of these were created before we had the tools to easily create portals (they used to take 6 hours or more to create, because it was all done manually). Rather than leave a portal link red, some editors thought it was best that those titles led somewhere.
The subjects that have sufficient coverage should have their own portals rather than a redirect to some other subject.
Unfortunately, being blue like all other live links, redirects are harder to spot than redlinks.
I really like and appreciate this template/lua module you created. It really makes a difference in the appearance of portals (see Portal:Blackberries and Portal:Blueberries). I was wondering if I could make a request/suggestion for improving it further...
To make this template fully versatile, could you modify the lua module to accept a parameter to set the starting pixel amount from the top? Then, between that and the max height parameter (working from the specified top, down), an editor of a portal could set the exact portion of a picture that he wants to display as a banner.
Then, skyline pics with too much sky could be cropped closer to the city's skyline, for example. There would be many other situations where editors would like to set the range displayed in a pic to get the best cropping to produce a banner from a non-banner picture.
Transhumanist I am trying to mockup a proof-of concept in my sandbox, it isn't going as per plan though. — fr+
06:58, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
A banner that could benefit from better cropping control...
And here is Niagara Falls!
Niagara falls
, from the Canadian side
Well, if you look closely, you can see the reflection of the falls in the clouds. — The Transhumanist 08:52, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
I can make the waterfall appear by adding the style margin-top: -450px to class portal-banner-image in Template:Portal image banner/styles.css. Of course, that would mess up hundreds of other pictures by chopping people's heads off, etc. I don't know whether there is any way to parameterise this as something like margin-top: -{{{croptop|0}}}px. Things I've tried that don't work but may have potential:
<span style="margin-top: -450px">{{Portal image banner…}}</span> — no effect
<style> portal-banner-image {margin-top: -450px} </style> — no effect (only works in the HTML head, not the body)
crop: rect(…) within .portal-banner-image in styles.css — no effect
It's not a solution but I hope that I'm on the right track and have some detail wrong which FR can fix. Certes (talk) 12:16, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Certes, I did mockup a basic proof-of-concept at my User:FR30799386/sandbox, however the problem is with displaying the cropped area reliably over devices with different veiwport sizes, the moment I try to resize my browser window with the current setup, it scrolls downwards thus ruining the whole thing. — fr+ 10:44, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Agreed. That looks great to me by default, but I can easily make it look awful by messing around with window sizes (in Firefox on Ubuntu). CSS is probably the weakest area of my web skills; anything I produce tends to be functional rather than pretty. Certes (talk) 13:12, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
The Transhumanist, could you provide more examples of images needing cropping? The proof-of-concept works on the image (after a lot of brainstorming) but I'd like to test it some more images before I put it live. — fr+ 05:59, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
The Transhumanist, does it work as expected ? — fr❄ 10:27, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
I thought you wanted some pics to try it out on. Now I know by "test case" you mean something the other person did. I've added parameters to the pics above. — The Transhumanist 11:31, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Transhumanist
, I used them in preview mode, to test my proof-of-concept, so you actually didn't see me using them
By the way, the caption doesn't show up when maxheight is used
Note, that the above example includes a caption. It has just disappeared for some reason. Just a heads up. I hope you find this bug report helpful. Cheers. — The Transhumanist 08:56, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
I have resolved it. — fr+ 06:58, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Missing XfD notice
So, you Reviewed a page (a page I created) [167], but I did not get a notice you also put it up for speedy deletion. How come this is (not) in the screening process? -DePiep (talk) 05:02, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Please stop spending Good Editors Time on this. -DePiep (talk) 05:05, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
DePiep, it must be an error with the software, cause I checked the "Notify the creator" checkbox on twinkle.... — fr❄ 05:06, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Additionally, please answer the query which I made on your t/p. Regards. — fr❄ 05:08, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
OK, I forget all about this by now. -DePiep (talk) 05:09, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
User:FR30799386 has pulled it off, and made the upgrade to {{Portal image banner}}...
So, this:
Niagara falls
, from the Canadian side
Becomes this:
Niagara falls
, from the Canadian side
Here's the code for the above banner:
{{Portal image banner|File:American Falls from Canadian side in winter.jpg | [[Niagara falls]], from the Canadian side |maxheight=175px |overflow=Hidden|croptop=10}}
...there is plenty else to do in addition to building new portals:
The new portals need to be linked to from the encyclopedia.
On those portals about subjects that are not typically capitalized, the search parameters need to be refined/expanded, to maximize the chances of Did you know and In the news items being found and displayed.
A Recognized content section needs to be added to each portal that has a corresponding WikiProject.
Addition of a category on those portals that lack a subject category.
Implement the portal category system, adding the appropriate categories to each portal.
Upgrade, and complete (as per the tasks enumerated above), the old-style portals that are not regularly maintained, which have not been converted yet (about 1,100 of them).
Find and fix the remaining bugs in the underlying lua modules.
Build portal tools (scripts) to assist in the creation, development, and maintenance of portals.
Build a script to help build navbox footer templates, via the harvesting of categories, amongst other methods.
Update the portal building instructions.
Update the portal guideline.
Refine the programming of the portals to reduce their load time.
Design and develop the next generation of portals and portal components.
Wishing you a happy new year, --DannyS712 (talk) 20:01, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
About the newsletter
Subscription options
Discuss this issue
Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup!
Hello and Happy New Year!
Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup, the competition begins today. If you have already joined, your submission page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and we will set up your submissions page. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2019, and which you have nominated this year, is eligible for points in the competition, the judges will be checking! Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk·contribs·email), Godot13 (talk·contribs·email), Vanamonde93 (talk·contribs·email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk·contribs·email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
FR30799386, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
PATH SLOPU (Talk) 08:48, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Wishing you a prosperous and happy new year. Good to see that you are back from your wikibreak. — fr❄ 11:58, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Script
Please have a talk with Earwig aprior to mass-deployment; because AFAIK, there's a finite bound on mass-calling &use_engine=1 through the API per credit-limitations. I note that he has said The tool's current API may not scale to the amount of traffic that the New Pages Feed would require. over T193809. FWIW, though the WMF integrated the alternate CopyPatrol engine into the PageTriage; per T203012, they had been careful enough to exclude certain low-byte pages from being screened for copyvio; to avoid meaningless usage of credits. ∯WBGconverse 15:57, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Tech News writers, editors and translators wish you a pleasant 2019 year.
Recent changes
RelatedSites extension has been undeployed. It was used to create interwiki links on Wikivoyage, now handled by Wikidata. [168]
MediaWiki logstash logging is moving to a new infrastructure. This is an ongoing deployment. [169]
codesearch.wmflabs.org has been updated, with new and updated repositories and a new search options for code. [170]
On several wikis, an account named "Edit filter" has been created on December 17 to perform some technical maintenance on AbuseFilter. This account has sysop rights but it's a system user and no human can use it. The account already existed on wikis where AbuseFilter can perform blocks, which are issued using this account. See T212268 for more information and future plans.
Problems
In AbuseFilter, the "Throttle" action takes three parameters: count, period and groups. They must now strictly respect the requirements listed on mediawiki.org. A list of broken filters is on Phabricator. If you're familiar with AbuseFilter, please take a look and fix them. [171]
Changes later this week
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from January 8. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from January 9. It will be on all wikis from January 10 (calendar).
Meetings
Search Platform Office Hours is rescheduled to January 9. Check the details for time and date.
Hi. I noticed you removed the "beta" warning from this script's page, here, but didn't change the infobox's status from "beta" to something else. Can I ask why? I was going to highlight the release in the updated section of
User:DannyS712/SPP 02, but if its not actually out of beta I wouldn't. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk
I already am planning on mentioning the gadget discussion. Was there something else? --DannyS712 (talk) 05:35, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Nah, the gadget discussion about it... << FR 05:37, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
January 2019
I'm at a loss of words.....I'll try my best to go for a self imposed sort of a one-way interaction ban (not commenting on this user or their actions).....At the worst.....we'll see how it goes.... << FR 14:18, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
To claim that the relisting admin has comprehension issues is unproductive and should be dealt on their talk page than spam something which has been already admitted by the creator. Aside from this recent edit war, your bludgeoning has been unproductive. Consider refraining from any further misconduct. Qualitist (talk) 06:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
WP:ANI is that way. Additionally, don't template the regulars .Regards. — fr+
07:01, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
You are replying everyone who has voted for keep and you are failing to convince anyone to change their vote, your comments often include personal attacks. That's textbook of bludgeoning and disruption. Now stop edit warring. Qualitist (talk) 07:05, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
WP:ANI is that way. If you don't, I certainly will when I have time. Regards. — fr+
07:45, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
You can now add captions to files on Commons. Captions are short descriptions of the file. They can be translated to all languages we use. They can't use wikitext markup.
Earlier a quoted HTML attribute had to be followed by a space. Now it doesn't. This means that some pages could look different when you save them even if you didn't edit that part of the text. [174][175]
Templates with <templatestyles> could not show the difference between the live template and the sandbox version when they were tested. This has now been fixed. <templatestyles> has a new wrapper parameter now. You can use it for selectors like .mw-parser-output <wrapper parameter value> <selector from CSS page>. [176]
Problems
When you see an edit in the recent changes feed or in the history of a page some of them have tags. Some tags are added automatically. You can also add tags manually. Tags for edits that have been added manually can be edited. This didn't work for a little while. This has now been fixed. [177]
Users who could cause more damage to the wikis if someone took over their account have to have more secure passwords. This includes administrators and other user groups. They can't use passwords that are in a list of common passwords. Accounts with common passwords are easy to take over. The list of common passwords was made longer a few weeks ago and has a different error message. Some user groups have been added to those who can't use common passwords. This is to protect all accounts with user rights that could cause damage. [178]
The AbuseFilter variable minor_edit has been removed. It was deprecated in 2016. Now you can't use it. You can fix the filters using it. You can find them if you use the search bar on Special:AbuseFilter.
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from January 15
DannyS712 has created a user script prototype, User:DannyS712/Cat links, that can pull members from a category, a functionality we've been after since the project's revamp last Spring. Now, it's a matter of applying this technique to scripts that will place the items where needed, such as with a section starter script and/or portal builder script.
DreamyJazz is working on a bot to place links to portals on root articles, category pages, and navigation footer templates.
Portal bugs are getting dealt with soon after they are reported.
Lots of wikignome activity (using Hotcat, etc.).
Keep up the good work. — The Transhumanist 09:37, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Budham Singh vandalizer
Howdy. I wonder, when is the Wikimedia going to 'range block' that mobile editor on the India related articles. GoodDay (talk) 16:23, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
<< FR(mobileUndo) 06:22, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Signed for archive bot << FR(mobileUndo)