Constantine Laskaris
Constantine Laskaris Κωνσταντίνος Λάσκαρις | |
---|---|
Byzantine Emperor) | |
Successor | Theodore I Laskaris |
Born | 1170 Constantinople (now Istanbul, Turkey) |
Died | 1205 |
House | Laskaris |
Father | Manuel Laskaris |
Mother | Ioanna Karatzaina |
Constantine Laskaris (
Early years
Constantine Laskaris was born of a noble but not particularly renowned Byzantine family.[citation needed] Virtually nothing is known of him prior to the events of the Fourth Crusade. He found favour after his brother Theodore married into the imperial family, becoming the son-in-law of Emperor Alexios III Angelos.[citation needed]
During the first siege of Constantinople by the Crusaders in 1203 he was given command of the best body of troops available and led the Roman defenders on sorties against the entrenched Crusaders. None were successful in their goal of lifting the siege, and finally Constantine was ordered to attack the Burgundians who were on guard at the time.[1]
The Romans issued forth from the city, but were soon driven back to the gates, notwithstanding the stones that the defenders on the walls threw down onto the advancing Crusaders. Constantine himself was captured whilst mounted on his horse by William of Neuilly[1] and probably kept for ransom, which was the usual practice of the times. At some point he was released, as he was soon swept up in the events of the second siege of Constantinople in 1204.
Elevation as Emperor
After the Crusaders entered
Two nominees presented themselves – Constantine Laskaris and Constantine Doukas (probably the son of John Angelos Doukas, and thus a first cousin to Isaac II Angelos and Alexios III).[3] Both presented their case to be nominated emperor, but the people could not decide between them, as both were young and had proven military skills. Eventually lots were cast and Laskaris was selected by what remained of the army as the next emperor.
Laskaris refused to accept the
Historical uncertainty of coronation
The primary source for the elevation of Constantine Laskaris is
This uncertainty, plus the fact that Constantine remained uncrowned, means that he is not always counted among the Byzantine emperors.[7] Therefore, the convention when it comes to Constantine Laskaris is that he is not usually assigned a numeral. If he is counted as Constantine XI, then Constantine XI Palaiologos, the last Emperor, is counted as Constantine XII.[8]
Career at Nicaea
Greek resistance to the Latin conquerors began almost immediately under the leadership of Theodore Laskaris, and he was soon joined by Constantine. They were hard pressed at first, and by early 1205 they had lost the important city of Adramyttion to the new Latin Emperor, Henry of Flanders. Theodore was keen to reverse this setback, and so he sent Constantine at the head of a large body of troops towards the city.[9]
Henry of Flanders had advance warning of the attack via an Armenian source, and prepared his forces to meet the Greeks. The two armies fought the Battle of Adramyttion on Saturday, 19 March 1205[9] outside the city walls, and the result was a massive defeat for Constantine Laskaris and the Greeks, with most of the army either perishing or being captured.[10]
Nothing more is heard of Constantine Laskaris after this battle, so it is presumed that he either perished in the defeat, or was captured.[citation needed]
Family
Constantine had six brothers: Manuel Laskaris (died after 1256), Michael Laskaris (died 1261/1271), Georgios Laskaris, Theodore, Alexios Laskaris, and Isaac Laskaris. The last two fought with the Latin Empire against Theodore Laskaris' successor, John III Doukas Vatatzes, and were imprisoned and blinded.[citation needed]
According to "The Latins in the Levant. A History of Frankish Greece (1204–1566)" by William Miller, the seven brothers may also have had a sister, the wife of Marco I Sanudo and mother of Angelo Sanudo. He based this theory on his own interpretation of Italian chronicles. However, the Dictionnaire historique et Généalogique des grandes familles de Grèce, d'Albanie et de Constantinople (1983) by Mihail-Dimitri Sturdza rejected the theory based on the silence of Byzantine primary sources.[citation needed]
References
- ^ a b Geoffrey De Villehardouin, 'Memoirs Or Chronicle of the Fourth Crusade and the Conquest of Constantinople', Echo Library, 2007, pg 31
- ^ ISBN 978-0-8143-1764-8.
- ^ Donald E. Queller, Thomas F. Madden, Alfred J. Andrea, 'Fourth Crusade: The Conquest of Constantinople', University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999, pg 189
- ^ ISBN 978-0-521-42894-1.
- ^ Steven Runciman, 'A History of the Crusades, Vol. 3: The Kingdom of Acre and the Later Crusades', Cambridge, 1954, pg 122
- ^ Donald E Queller, 'The Fourth Crusade: The Conquest of Constantinople 1201–1204', University Park, 1977, pg 147; 216–217
- ^ a b Donald Nicol, 'The Last Centuries of Byzantium: 1261–1453', Cambridge University Press, 1993, pg 369
- ^ Britannica
- ^ a b Geoffrey De Villehardouin, 'Memoirs Or Chronicle of the Fourth Crusade and the Conquest of Constantinople', Echo Library, 2007, pg 63
- ISBN 978-0-8143-1764-8.
Sources
- ISBN 0-246-10559-3.