Marwan ibn Abi Hafsa

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Abu'l-Simt Marwan al-Akbar ibn Sulayman ibn Yahya ibn Abi Hafsa (

Arabic poet at the court of the Abbasid Caliphate during the second half of the 8th century. He was born to a non-Arab family.[1]

Biography

Marwan belonged to what the 11th-century anthologist

Marwan was born in

Abbasid caliphs al-Mansur (r. 754–775) and al-Mahdi (r. 775–785) are said to have taken offence at the lavish praise, and to have excluded him from their presence for one year thereafter.[2] Nevertheless he always returned to favour, not least because he shared his family's hostility to the Alids and was a staunch propagandist of the Abbasids' legitimacy.[2] He was assassinated in c. 797/8 under unclear circumstances.[2][3] The story that his assassin was an Alid supporter angry about his attacks on their claims to the caliphate may be apocryphal, but as the historian H. Kilpatrick notes, it nevertheless "suggests the impact that his poetry had".[3]

His brother Idris also wrote poetry, but it was Marwan's grandson, Marwan ibn Abi'l-Janub, who was the last notable poet of the family.[2]

Assessment

Bencheikh considers Marwan "a great classical poet" and "a master of the well-turned utterance", with a "supple and lexically straightforward vocabulary" and "clear syntax" that lent themselves to striking formulations in his panegyrics.[2] According to H. Kilpatrick, he was "a master of the classical style associated with the great Umayyad panegyrists".[3]

He was meticulous in the composition and preparation of his poems, first showing them to grammarians to improve his language.

al-Asma'i (d. 828/833) scorned him as a half-Arab (muwallad) who never properly learned the language, and anecdotes tell of his giving incorrect explanations of words.[2] At the same time, this was typical of the poets of his time, and did not prevent other philologists from praising his work: Ibn al-A'rabi (d. 846) considered him the last of the great poets.[2] The bulk of his work is panegyric or elegiac in nature, but a few compositions on private, everyday affairs, have also survived.[3]

References

  1. ^ .
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Bencheikh 1991, pp. 625–626.
  3. ^ a b c d e Kilpatrick 1998, p. 511.

Sources