Sulindac

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Sulindac
Clinical data
Trade namesClinoril
AHFS/Drugs.comMonograph
MedlinePlusa681037
Pregnancy
category
  • AU: C
Routes of
administration
By mouth
ATC code
Legal status
Legal status
  • AU: S4 (Prescription only)
  • UK: POM (Prescription only)
  • US: ℞-only
Pharmacokinetic data
BioavailabilityApproximately 90% (Oral)
Metabolism?
Elimination half-life7.8 hours, metabolites up to 16.4 hours
ExcretionRenal (50%) and fecal (25%)
Identifiers
  • {(1Z)-5-fluoro-2-methyl-1-[4-(methylsulfinyl)benzylidene]-1H-indene-3-yl}acetic acid
JSmol)
Melting point182 to 185 °C (360 to 365 °F) (decomp.)
  • O=S(c1ccc(cc1)\C=C3/c2ccc(F)cc2\C(=C3C)CC(=O)O)C
  • InChI=1S/C20H17FO3S/c1-12-17(9-13-3-6-15(7-4-13)25(2)24)16-8-5-14(21)10-19(16)18(12)11-20(22)23/h3-10H,11H2,1-2H3,(H,22,23)/b17-9- checkY
  • Key:MLKXDPUZXIRXEP-MFOYZWKCSA-N checkY
 ☒NcheckY (what is this?)  (verify)

Sulindac is a

mebaral
) is another name for this drug. Its name is derived from sul(finyl)+ ind(ene)+ ac(etic acid) It was patented in 1969 and approved for medical use in 1976.[1]

Medical uses

Like other NSAIDs, it is useful in the treatment of

COX-2 inhibitor class.[2] The exact mechanism of its NSAID properties is unknown, but it is thought to act on enzymes COX-1 and COX-2, inhibiting prostaglandin
synthesis.

Its usual

peptic ulcer
disease. Sulindac is much more likely than other NSAIDs to cause damage to the liver or pancreas, though it is less likely to cause kidney damage than other NSAIDs.

Sulindac seems to have a property, independent of COX-inhibition, of reducing the growth of polyps and precancerous lesions in the colon, especially in association with familial adenomatous polyposis, and may have other anti-cancer properties.[3][4]

Adverse effects

In October 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) required the drug label to be updated for all nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications to describe the risk of kidney problems in unborn babies that result in low amniotic fluid.[5][6] They recommend avoiding NSAIDs in pregnant women at 20 weeks or later in pregnancy.[5][6]

Society and culture

Litigation

In September 2010 a federal jury in New Hampshire awarded $21 million to Karen Bartlett, a woman who developed Stevens–Johnson syndrome/Toxic epidermal necrolysis as a result of taking a generic brand of sulindac manufactured by Mutual Pharmaceuticals for her shoulder pain. Ms. Bartlett sustained severe injuries including the loss of over 60% of her surface skin and permanent near-blindness. The case had been appealed to the United States Supreme Court, where the main issue was whether federal law preempts Ms. Bartlett's claim.[7] On June 24, 2013, the Supreme Court ruled 5–4 in favor of Mutual Pharmaceuticals, throwing out the earlier $21 million jury verdict.[8] [9]

Synthesis

Sulindac synthesis:[10][11][12][13]

Rxn of p-fluorobenzyl chloride (1) with the anion of diethylmethyl malonate (2) gives intermediate diester (3), saponification of which and subsequent decarboxylation leads to 4. {Alternatively it can be formed by

catalytic hydrogenation
of the olefinic bond using a palladium on carbon catalyst.}

tosic acid to indene 6. {Alternatively, this step can be performed in a Knoevenagel condensation with cyanoacetic acid
, which is then further decarboxylated.}

The active methylene group is condensed with p-

antiinflammatory
agent sulindac.

References

  1. .
  2. .
  3. PMID 17401459. Archived from the original
    on 2012-09-05.
  4. .
  5. ^ a b "FDA Warns that Using a Type of Pain and Fever Medication in Second Half of Pregnancy Could Lead to Complications". U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (Press release). 15 October 2020. Retrieved 15 October 2020. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  6. ^ a b "NSAIDs may cause rare kidney problems in unborn babies". U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 21 July 2017. Retrieved 15 October 2020. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  7. ^ Thomas K (2013-03-04). "Justices to Take Up Case on Generic Drug Markers' Liability". New York Times. Retrieved 4 March 2013.
  8. ^ Kendall B. "Supreme Court Again Limits Product-Liability Suits on Generic Drugs". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 24 June 2013.
  9. ^ Bartlett v. Mut. Pharm. Co., Inc., 678 F.3d 30 (D.C. Cir. March 19, 2013).
  10. .
  11. ^ DE 2039426, Greenwald RB, Witzel EB, "Indenyl acetic acid and process for its preparation", issued 20 February 1975, assigned to Merck and Co Inc. 
  12. ^ US 3647858, Conn JB, Hinkley DF, "Process for preparing 1-benzylidene-3-indenyl acetic acids", issued 7 March 1972, assigned to Merck and Co Inc. 
  13. ^ US 3654349, Greenwald RB, Jones H, "Substituted indenyl acetic acids", issued 4 April 1972, assigned to Merck and Co Inc. 

External links