Immortality

Listen to this article
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The Fountain of Eternal Life in Cleveland, Ohio, United States, is described as symbolizing "Man rising above death, reaching upward to God and toward Peace."[1]

Immortality is the concept of eternal life.[2] Some species possess 'biological immortality' due to an apparent lack of the Hayflick limit.[3][4]

Some scientists,

technologies such as mind uploading (digital immortality).[5] Other advocates believe that life extension is a more achievable goal in the short term, with immortality awaiting further research breakthroughs. The absence of aging would provide humans with biological immortality, but not invulnerability to death by disease or injury. Whether the process of internal immortality is delivered within the upcoming years depends chiefly on research (and in neuron research in the case of internal immortality through an immortalized cell line) in the former view and perhaps is an awaited goal in the latter case.[6]

From at least the time of the

resurrection of the flesh at the end of time has traditionally been at the center of its beliefs.[7][8][9] What form an unending human life would take, or whether an immaterial soul exists and possesses immortality, has been a major point of focus of religion,[10] as well as the subject of speculation and debate. In religious contexts, immortality is often stated to be one of the promises of divinities to human beings who perform virtue or follow divine law.[citation needed
]

Definitions

Scientific

rejuvenation. Cryonics holds out the hope that the dead can be revived in the future, following sufficient medical advancements. While, as shown with creatures such as hydra and Planarian worms, it is indeed possible for a creature to be biologically immortal, these are animals which are physiologically very different from humans, and it is not known if something comparable will ever be possible for humans.[11][12]

Religious

Immortality in religion refers usually to either the belief in physical immortality or a more spiritual

Rebirthers
.

Physical immortality

Physical immortality is a state of life that allows a person to avoid death and maintain conscious thought. It can mean the unending existence of a person from a physical source other than organic life, such as a computer.

Pursuit of physical immortality before the advent of modern science included alchemists, who sought to create the Philosopher's Stone,[15] and various cultures' legends such as the Fountain of Youth or the Peaches of Immortality inspiring attempts at discovering an elixir of life.[16][17]

Modern scientific trends, such as

rejuvenation, or predictions of an impending technological singularity, to achieve genuine human physical immortality, must still overcome all causes of death to succeed.[18][19]

Causes of death

There are three main causes of death:

injury.[20]
Such issues can be resolved with the solutions provided in research to any end providing such alternate theories at present that require unification.

Aging

endocrine changes. Eliminating aging would require finding a solution to each of these causes, a program de Grey calls engineered negligible senescence. There is also a huge body of knowledge indicating that change is characterized by the loss of molecular fidelity.[22]

Disease

Disease is theoretically surmountable by technology. In short, it is an abnormal condition affecting the body of an organism, something the body should not typically have to deal with its natural make up.

stem cells. Breakthroughs in cell biology and telomere research are leading to treatments for cancer. Vaccines are being researched for AIDS and tuberculosis. Genes associated with type 1 diabetes and certain types of cancer have been discovered, allowing for new therapies to be developed. Artificial devices attached directly to the nervous system
may restore sight to the blind. Drugs are being developed to treat a myriad of other diseases and ailments.

Trauma

response remains a determining factor in surviving severe trauma.[24] A body that could automatically repair itself from severe trauma, such as speculated uses for nanotechnology
, would mitigate this factor. The brain cannot be risked to trauma if a continuous physical life is to be maintained. This aversion to trauma risk to the brain would naturally result in significant behavioral changes that would render physical immortality undesirable for some people.

Environmental change

Organisms otherwise unaffected by these causes of death would still face the problem of obtaining sustenance (whether from currently available agricultural processes or from hypothetical future technological processes) in the face of changing availability of suitable resources as environmental conditions change. After avoiding aging, disease, and trauma, death through resource limitation is still possible, such as

.

If there is no limitation on the degree of gradual mitigation of risk then it is possible that the

'actuarial escape velocity'
.

Biological immortality

Human chromosomes (grey) capped by telomeres (white)

Biological immortality is an absence of aging. Specifically it is the absence of a sustained increase in

rate of mortality as a function of chronological age. A cell or organism that does not experience aging, or ceases to age at some point, is biologically immortal.[25]

Biologists have chosen the word "immortal" to designate cells that are not limited by the Hayflick limit, where cells no longer divide because of DNA damage or shortened telomeres. The first and still most widely used immortal cell line is HeLa, developed from cells taken from the malignant cervical tumor of Henrietta Lacks without her consent in 1951. Prior to the 1961 work of Leonard Hayflick, there was the erroneous belief fostered by Alexis Carrel that all normal somatic cells are immortal. By preventing cells from reaching senescence one can achieve biological immortality; telomeres, a "cap" at the end of DNA, are thought to be the cause of cell aging. Every time a cell divides the telomere becomes a bit shorter; when it is finally worn down, the cell is unable to split and dies. Telomerase is an enzyme which rebuilds the telomeres in stem cells and cancer cells, allowing them to replicate an infinite number of times.[26] No definitive work has yet demonstrated that telomerase can be used in human somatic cells to prevent healthy tissues from aging. On the other hand, scientists hope to be able to grow organs with the help of stem cells, allowing organ transplants without the risk of rejection, another step in extending human life expectancy. These technologies are the subject of ongoing research, and are not yet realized.[27]

Biologically immortal species

Life defined as biologically immortal is still susceptible to causes of death besides aging, including disease and trauma, as defined above. Notable immortal species include:

  • Bacteria – Bacteria reproduce through
    PLoS Biology paper[28] suggests that after each division the daughter cells can be identified as the older and the younger, and the older is slightly smaller, weaker, and more likely to die than the younger.[29]
  • indefinite lifespan.[30] Its immortal adaptation has allowed it to spread from its original habitat in the Caribbean to "all over the world".[31][32]

Evolution of aging

As the existence of biologically immortal species demonstrates, there is no thermodynamic necessity for senescence: a defining feature of life is that it takes in free energy from the environment and unloads its entropy as waste. Living systems can even build themselves up from seed, and routinely repair themselves. Aging is therefore presumed to be a byproduct of evolution, but why mortality should be selected for remains a subject of research and debate. Programmed cell death and the telomere "end replication problem" are found even in the earliest and simplest of organisms.[35] This may be a tradeoff between selecting for cancer and selecting for aging.[36]

Modern theories on the evolution of aging include the following:

  • Mutation accumulation is a theory formulated by Peter Medawar in 1952 to explain how evolution would select for aging. Essentially, aging is never selected against, as organisms have offspring before the mortal mutations surface in an individual.
  • George C. Williams, a critic of Medawar, in 1957. In antagonistic pleiotropy, genes carry effects that are both beneficial and detrimental. In essence this refers to genes that offer benefits early in life, but exact a cost later on, i.e. decline and death.[37]
  • The disposable soma theory was proposed in 1977 by Thomas Kirkwood, which states that an individual body must allocate energy for metabolism, reproduction, and maintenance, and must compromise when there is food scarcity. Compromise in allocating energy to the repair function is what causes the body gradually to deteriorate with age, according to Kirkwood.[38]

Immortality of the germline

Individual organisms ordinarily age and die, while the germlines which connect successive generations are potentially immortal. The basis for this difference is a fundamental problem in biology. The Russian biologist and historian

Zhores A. Medvedev[39] considered that the accuracy of genome replicative and other synthetic systems alone cannot explain the immortality of germlines. Rather Medvedev thought that known features of the biochemistry and genetics of sexual reproduction indicate the presence of unique information maintenance and restoration processes at the different stages of gametogenesis. In particular, Medvedev considered that the most important opportunities for information maintenance of germ cells are created by recombination during meiosis and DNA repair; he saw these as processes within the germ cells that were capable of restoring the integrity of DNA and chromosomes from the types of damage that cause irreversible aging in somatic cells
.

Prospects for human biological immortality

Life-extending substances

Some[who?] scientists believe that boosting the amount or proportion of telomerase in the body, a naturally forming enzyme that helps maintain the protective caps at the ends of chromosomes, could prevent cells from dying and so may ultimately lead to extended, healthier lifespans. A team of researchers at the Spanish National Cancer Centre (Madrid) tested the hypothesis on mice. It was found that those mice which were "genetically engineered to produce 10 times the normal levels of telomerase lived 50% longer than normal mice".[40]

In normal circumstances, without the presence of telomerase, if a cell divides repeatedly, at some point all the progeny will reach their Hayflick limit. With the presence of telomerase, each dividing cell can replace the lost bit of DNA, and any single cell can then divide unbounded. While this unbounded growth property has excited many researchers, caution is warranted in exploiting this property, as exactly this same unbounded growth is a crucial step in enabling cancerous growth. If an organism can replicate its body cells faster, then it would theoretically stop aging.

Embryonic stem cells express telomerase, which allows them to divide repeatedly and form the individual. In adults, telomerase is highly expressed in cells that need to divide regularly (e.g., in the immune system), whereas most somatic
cells express it only at very low levels in a cell-cycle dependent manner.

Technological immortality, biological machines, and "swallowing the doctor"

Technological immortality is the prospect for much longer life spans made possible by scientific advances in a variety of fields: nanotechnology, emergency room procedures, genetics,

biological machine). Hibbs suggested that certain repair machines might one day be reduced in size to the point that it would, in theory, be possible to (as Feynman put it) "swallow the doctor". The idea was incorporated into Feynman's 1959 essay There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom.[43]

Cryonics

aging is reversible. Modern cryonics procedures use a process called vitrification which creates a glass-like state rather than freezing
as the body is brought to low temperatures. This process reduces the risk of ice crystals damaging the cell-structure, which would be especially detrimental to cell structures in the brain, as their minute adjustment evokes the individual's mind.

Mind-to-computer uploading

One idea that has been advanced involves

Extropian futurists like Moravec and Kurzweil have proposed that, thanks to exponentially growing computing power, it will someday be possible to upload human consciousness
onto a computer system, and exist indefinitely in a virtual environment.

This could be accomplished via advanced cybernetics, where computer hardware would initially be installed in the brain to help sort memory or accelerate thought processes. Components would be added gradually until the person's entire brain functions were handled by artificial devices, avoiding sharp transitions that would lead to issues of identity, thus running the risk of the person to be declared dead and thus not be a legitimate owner of his or her property. After this point, the human body could be treated as an optional accessory and the program implementing the person could be transferred to any sufficiently powerful computer.

Another possible mechanism for mind upload is to perform a detailed scan of an individual's original, organic brain and simulate the entire structure in a computer. What level of detail such scans and simulations would need to achieve to emulate awareness, and whether the scanning process would destroy the brain, is still to be determined.[a]

It is suggested that achieving immortality through this mechanism would require specific consideration to be given to the role of consciousness in the functions of the mind. An uploaded mind would only be a copy of the original mind, and not the conscious mind of the living entity associated in such a transfer. Without a simultaneous upload of consciousness, the original living entity remains mortal, thus not achieving true immortality.[45] Research on neural correlates of consciousness is yet inconclusive on this issue. Whatever the route to mind upload, persons in this state could then be considered essentially immortal, short of loss or traumatic destruction of the machines that maintained them.[clarification needed][citation needed]

Cybernetics

Transforming a human into a

brain implants or extracting a human processing unit and placing it in a robotic life-support system.[46] Even replacing biological organs with robotic ones could increase life span (e.g. pace makers) and depending on the definition, many technological upgrades to the body, like genetic modifications or the addition of nanobots would qualify an individual as a cyborg. Some people believe that such modifications would make one impervious to aging and disease and theoretically immortal unless killed or destroyed.[citation needed
]

Digital immortality

Religious views

As late as 1952, the editorial staff of the

Syntopicon found in their compilation of the Great Books of the Western World, that "The philosophical issue concerning immortality cannot be separated from issues concerning the existence and nature of man's soul."[47]
Thus, the vast majority of speculation on immortality before the 21st century was regarding the nature of the afterlife.

Abrahamic religion

The viewpoints of

theological interpretations and doctrines on the enduring human nature soul or spirit
.

Christianity

Adam and Eve condemned to mortality. Hans Holbein the Younger, Danse Macabre, 16th century

Christian theology holds that Adam and Eve lost physical immortality for themselves and all their descendants through the Fall, although this initial "imperishability of the bodily frame of man" was "a preternatural condition".[48]

Christians who profess the Nicene Creed believe that every dead person (whether they believed in Christ or not) will be resurrected from the dead at the Second Coming; this belief is known as universal resurrection.[7] Paul the Apostle, in following his past life as a Pharisee (a Jewish social movement that held to a future physical resurrection[49]), proclaims an amalgamated view of resurrected believers where both the physical and the spiritual are rebuilt in the likeness of post-resurrection Christ, who "will transform our lowly body to be like his glorious body" (ESV).[50] This thought mirrors Paul's depiction of believers having been "buried therefore with him [that is, Christ] by baptism into death" (ESV).[51]

Heaven and Earth "joined together in a new creation"
, he said.

Christian apocrypha include immortal human figures such as

Cartaphilus[53] who were cursed with physical immortality for various transgressions against Christ during the Passion. The medieval Waldensians believed in the immortality of the soul.[54] Leaders of sects such as John Asgill and John Wroe taught followers that physical immortality was possible.[55][56]

Many Patristic writers have connected the immortal rational soul to the image of God found in Genesis 1:26. Among them is Athanasius of Alexandria and Clement of Alexandria, who say that the immortal rational soul itself is the image of God.[57] Even Early Christian Liturgies exhibit this connection between the immortal rational soul and the creation of humanity in the image of God.[57]

Islam

Islamic beliefs bears the concept of spiritual immortality within it; following the death of a certain individual, it will be arbitrated consistent with its beliefs as well as actions and will embark on the ever-lasting place where they will abate. The

five pillars of Islam will make an entrance into the Jannah
, where they will inhabit indefinitely.

Al-Baqarah
(2:25): "But give glad tidings to those who believe and work righteousness, that their portion is gardens, beneath which rivers flow. Every time they are fed with fruits therefrom, they say, 'Why, this is what we were fed with before,' for they are given things in similitude; and they have therein companions pure (and holy); and they abide therein forever."

In contrast, the kafir hold the contradictory notion that they abide in Jahannam perpetually.[58][59][60]

including humans
, to die eventually.

كُلُّ نَفْسٍ ذَائِقَةُ الْمَوْتِ (Every soul will taste death)

— Quran 3:185
It symbolize the transient nature of life and challenge the concept of immortality in the physical world. This phrase reflects the impermanence of all things.

Judaism

The traditional concept of an immaterial and immortal soul distinct from the body was not found in Judaism before the

Persian and Hellenistic philosophies. Accordingly, the Hebrew word nephesh, although translated as "soul" in some older English-language Bibles, actually has a meaning closer to "living being".[70][need quotation to verify] Nephesh was rendered in the Septuagint as ψυχή (psūchê), the Greek word for 'soul'.[citation needed
]

The only Hebrew word traditionally translated "soul" (nephesh) in English language Bibles refers to a living, breathing conscious body, rather than to an immortal soul.[b] In the New Testament, the Greek word traditionally translated "soul" (ψυχή) has substantially the same meaning as the Hebrew, without reference to an immortal soul.[c] "Soul" may refer either to the whole person, the self, as in "three thousand souls" were converted in Acts 2:41 (see Acts 3:23).

The

resurrection of the dead. This doctrine of resurrection is mentioned explicitly only in Daniel 12:1–4 although it may be implied in several other texts. New theories arose concerning Sheol during the intertestamental period
.

The views about immortality in Judaism is perhaps best exemplified by the various references to this in

Both Josephus and the New Testament record that the Sadducees did not believe in an afterlife,[76] but the sources vary on the beliefs of the Pharisees. The New Testament claims that the Pharisees believed in the resurrection, but does not specify whether this included the flesh or not.[77] According to Josephus, who himself was a Pharisee, the Pharisees held that only the soul was immortal and the souls of good people will be reincarnated and "pass into other bodies", while "the souls of the wicked will suffer eternal punishment."[78] The Book of Jubilees seems to refer to the resurrection of the soul only, or to a more general idea of an immortal soul.[79]

Tanakh is not specific about the afterlife, so there are wide differences in views and explanations among believers.[citation needed
]

Dharmic religions

The perspectives on immortality within

.

Hinduism

Representation of a soul undergoing punarjanma. Illustration from Hinduism Today, 2004

samsara. If they live their life well, their karma improves and their station in the next life will be higher, and conversely lower if they live their life poorly. After many life times of perfecting its karma, the soul is freed from the cycle and lives in perpetual bliss. There is no place of eternal torment in Hinduism, although if a soul consistently lives very evil lives, it could work its way down to the very bottom of the cycle.[citation needed
]

There are explicit renderings in the

Upanishads alluding to a physically immortal state brought about by purification, and sublimation of the 5 elements that make up the body. For example, in the Shvetashvatara Upanishad
(Chapter 2, Verse 12), it is stated "When earth, water, fire, air and sky arise, that is to say, when the five attributes of the elements, mentioned in the books on yoga, become manifest then the yogi's body becomes purified by the fire of yoga and he is free from illness, old age and death."

Another view of immortality is traced to the Vedic tradition by the interpretation of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi:

That man indeed whom these (contacts)
do not disturb, who is even-minded in
pleasure and pain, steadfast, he is fit
for immortality, O best of men.[80]

To Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, the verse means, "Once a man has become established in the understanding of the permanent reality of life, his mind rises above the influence of pleasure and pain. Such an unshakable man passes beyond the influence of death and in the permanent phase of life: he attains eternal life ... A man established in the understanding of the unlimited abundance of absolute existence is naturally free from existence of the relative order. This is what gives him the status of immortal life."[80]

An Indian Tamil saint known as

Vallalar claimed to have achieved immortality before disappearing forever from a locked room in 1874.[81][unreliable source?][82]

Buddhism

One of the three marks of existence in Buddhism is

Tibetan Buddhist teaching, Dzogchen, individuals can transform the physical body into an immortal body of light called the rainbow body.[83]

Ancient religions

Within the intricate tapestry of ancient religious ideologies, delve into a profound contemplation of the concept of immortality. Simultaneously, broaden the expanse of this intellectual exploration, allowing for a more comprehensive examination of the subject matter.

Ancient Greek religion

Immortality in

Islands of the Blessed
, heaven, the ocean or literally right under the ground. Among those humans made immortal were
Amphiaraus, Ganymede, Ino, Iphigenia, Menelaus, Peleus, and a great number of those who fought in the Trojan and Theban wars. Asclepius was killed by Zeus, and by Apollo's request, was subsequently immortalized as a star.[84][85][86]

In

Aristeas of Proconnesus was first found dead, after which his body disappeared from a locked room. He would reappear alive years later.[87] However, Greek attitudes towards resurrection were generally negative, and the idea of resurrection was considered neither desirable nor possible.[88] For example, Asclepius was killed by Zeus for using herbs to resurrect the dead, but by his father Apollo's request, was subsequently immortalized as a star.[84][85][86]

Writing his Lives of Illustrious Men (

Proconnesian, "for they say Aristeas died in a fuller's work-shop, and his friends coming to look for him, found his body vanished; and that some presently after, coming from abroad, said they met him traveling towards Croton". Plutarch openly scorned such beliefs held in ancient Greek religion, writing, "many such improbabilities do your fabulous writers relate, deifying creatures naturally mortal."[89] Likewise, he writes that while something within humans comes from the gods and returns to them after death, this happens "only when it is most completely separated and set free from the body, and becomes altogether pure, fleshless, and undefiled."[90]

The parallel between these traditional beliefs and the later resurrection of Jesus was not lost on early Christians, as Justin Martyr argued:

"when we say ... Jesus Christ, our teacher, was crucified and died, and rose again, and ascended into heaven, we propose nothing different from what you believe regarding those whom you consider sons of Zeus."[91]

The philosophical idea of an immortal soul was a belief first appearing with either

Orphics, and most importantly advocated by Plato and his followers. This, however, never became the general norm in Hellenistic thought. As may be witnessed even into the Christian era, not least by the complaints of various philosophers over popular beliefs, many or perhaps most traditional Greeks maintained the conviction that certain individuals were resurrected from the dead and made physically immortal and that others could only look forward to an existence as disembodied and dead, though everlasting, souls.[13]

Zoroastrianism

Iranian calendar (near the end of July). The month of Amurdad or Ameretat is celebrated in Persian culture as ancient Persians believed the "Angel of Immortality" won over the "Angel of Death" in this month.[92]

Philosophical religions

Within the realm of philosophical religious paradigms, engage in a profound exploration of the concept of immortality. Simultaneously, expand the breadth and depth of this intellectual inquiry to afford a more intricate examination of the subject matter.

Taoism

It is repeatedly stated in the Lüshi Chunqiu that death is unavoidable.[93] Henri Maspero noted that many scholarly works frame Taoism as a school of thought focused on the quest for immortality.[94] Isabelle Robinet asserts that Taoism is better understood as a way of life than as a religion, and that its adherents do not approach or view Taoism the way non-Taoist historians have done.[95] In the Tractate of Actions and their Retributions, a traditional teaching, spiritual immortality can be rewarded to people who do a certain amount of good deeds and live a simple, pure life. A list of good deeds and sins are tallied to determine whether or not a mortal is worthy. Spiritual immortality in this definition allows the soul to leave the earthly realms of afterlife and go to pure realms in the Taoist cosmology.[96]

Philosophical arguments for the immortality of the soul

Alcmaeon of Croton

Alcmaeon of Croton argued that the soul is continuously and ceaselessly in motion. The exact form of his argument is unclear, but it appears to have influenced Plato, Aristotle, and other later writers.[97]

Plato

Plato's Phaedo advances four arguments for the soul's immortality:[98]

  • The Cyclical Argument, or Opposites Argument explains that Forms are eternal and unchanging, and as the soul always brings life, then it must not die, and is necessarily "imperishable". As the body is mortal and is subject to physical death, the soul must be its indestructible opposite. Plato then suggests the analogy of fire and cold. If the form of cold is imperishable, and fire, its opposite, was within close proximity, it would have to withdraw intact as does the soul during death. This could be likened to the idea of the opposite charges of magnets.
  • The Theory of Recollection explains that we possess some non-empirical knowledge (e.g. The Form of Equality) at birth, implying the soul existed before birth to carry that knowledge. Another account of the theory is found in Plato's Meno, although in that case Socrates implies anamnesis (previous knowledge of everything) whereas he is not so bold in Phaedo.
  • The Affinity Argument, explains that invisible, immortal, and incorporeal things are different from visible, mortal, and corporeal things. Our soul is of the former, while our body is of the latter, so when our bodies die and decay, our soul will continue to live.
  • The Argument from Form of Life or The Final Argument explains that the Forms, incorporeal and static entities, are the cause of all things in the world, and all things participate in Forms. For example, beautiful things participate in the Form of Beauty; the number four participates in the Form of the Even, etc. The soul, by its very nature, participates in the Form of Life, which means the soul can never die.

Plotinus

Plotinus offers a version of the argument that Kant calls "The Achilles of Rationalist Psychology". Plotinus first argues that the soul is simple, then notes that a simple being cannot decompose. Many subsequent philosophers have argued both that the soul is simple and that it must be immortal. The tradition arguably culminates with Moses Mendelssohn's Phaedon.[99]

Metochites

Theodore Metochites argues that part of the soul's nature is to move itself, but that a given movement will cease only if what causes the movement is separated from the thing moved – an impossibility if they are one and the same.[100]

Avicenna

Avicenna argued for the distinctness of the soul and the body, and the incorruptibility of the former.[d]

Aquinas

The full argument for the immortality of the soul and Thomas Aquinas' elaboration of Aristotelian theory is found in Question 75 of the First Part of the Summa Theologica.[106]

Descartes

René Descartes endorses the claim that the soul is simple, and also that this entails that it cannot decompose. Descartes does not address the possibility that the soul might suddenly disappear.[107]

Leibniz

In early work, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz endorses a version of the argument from the simplicity of the soul to its immortality, but like his predecessors, he does not address the possibility that the soul might suddenly disappear. In his monadology he advances a sophisticated novel argument for the immortality of monads.[108]

Moses Mendelssohn

Moses Mendelssohn's Phaedon is a defense of the simplicity and immortality of the soul. It is a series of three dialogues, revisiting the Platonic dialogue Phaedo, in which Socrates argues for the immortality of the soul, in preparation for his own death. Many philosophers, including Plotinus, Descartes, and Leibniz, argue that the soul is simple, and that because simples cannot decompose they must be immortal. In the Phaedon, Mendelssohn addresses gaps in earlier versions of this argument (an argument that Kant calls the Achilles of Rationalist Psychology). The Phaedon contains an original argument for the simplicity of the soul, and also an original argument that simples cannot suddenly disappear. It contains further original arguments that the soul must retain its rational capacities as long as it exists.[109]

Ethics

The possibility of clinical immortality raises a host of medical, philosophical, and religious issues and ethical questions. These include

persistent vegetative states, the nature of personality over time, technology to mimic or copy the mind or its processes, social and economic disparities created by longevity, and survival of the heat death of the universe
.

Undesirability

Physical immortality has also been imagined as a form of eternal torment, as in the myth of Tithonus, or in Mary Shelley's short story The Mortal Immortal, where the protagonist lives to witness everyone he cares about die around him. For additional examples in fiction, see Immortality in fiction.

Kagan (2012)[110] argues that any form of human immortality would be undesirable. Kagan's argument takes the form of a dilemma. Either our characters remain essentially the same in an immortal afterlife, or they do not:

  • If our characters remain basically the same – that is, if we retain more or less the desires, interests, and goals that we have now – then eventually, over an infinite stretch of time, we will get bored and find eternal life unbearably tedious.
  • If, on the other hand, our characters are radically changed – e.g., by God periodically erasing our memories or giving us rat-like brains that never tire of certain simple pleasures – then such a person would be too different from our current self for us to care much what happens to them.

Either way, Kagan argues, immortality is unattractive. The best outcome, Kagan argues, would be for humans to live as long as they desired and then to accept death gratefully as rescuing us from the unbearable tedium of immortality.[110]

Sociology

If human beings were to achieve immortality, there would most likely be a change in the world's

demographic shift of increasingly ageing populations with lower replacement rates.[113]
The social changes that are made to accommodate this new population shift may be able to offer insight on the possibility of an immortal society.

Sociology has a growing body of literature on the sociology of immortality, which details the different attempts at reaching immortality (whether actual or symbolic) and their prominence in the 21st century. These attempts include renewed attention to the dead in the West,[114] practices of online memorialization,[115] and biomedical attempts to increase longevity.[116] These attempts at reaching immortality and their effects in societal structures have led some to argue that we are becoming a "Postmortal Society".[117][118] Foreseen changes to societies derived from the pursuit of immortality would encompass societal paradigms and worldviews, as well as the institutional landscape. Similarly, different forms of reaching immortality might entail a significant reconfiguration of societies, from becoming more technologically oriented to becoming more aligned with nature.[119]

Immortality would increase population growth,[120] bringing with it many consequences as for example the impact of population growth on the environment and planetary boundaries.

Politics

Although some scientists state that radical life extension, delaying and stopping aging are achievable,[121] there are no international or national programs focused on stopping aging or on radical life extension. In 2012 in Russia, and then in the United States, Israel and the Netherlands, pro-immortality political parties were launched. They aimed to provide political support to anti-aging and radical life extension research and technologies and at the same time transition to the next step, radical life extension, life without aging, and finally, immortality and aim to make possible access to such technologies to most currently living people.[122]

Some scholars critique the increasing support for immortality projects. Panagiotis Pentaris speculates that defeating ageing as the cause of death comes with a cost: "heightened stratification of humans in society and a wider gap between social classes".[123] Others suggest that other immortality projects like transhumanist digital immortality, radical life extension and cryonics are part of the capitalist fabric of exploitation and control,[124] which aims to extend privileged lives of the economic elite.[125] In this sense, immortality could become a political-economic battleground for the twenty-first century between the haves and have-nots.[123][124]

Symbols

The ankh

There are numerous symbols representing immortality. The

peacock in Christianity,[126] and the colors amaranth (in Western culture) and peach (in Chinese culture
).

See also

Footnotes

  1. ^ The basic idea is to take a particular brain, scan its structure in detail, and construct a software model of it that is so faithful to the original that, when run on appropriate hardware, it will behave in essentially the same way as the original brain.
    — Sandberg & Boström (2008)[44]
  2. ^ "Even as we are conscious of the broad and very common biblical usage of the term "soul", we must be clear that scripture does not present even a rudimentarily developed theology of the soul. The creation narrative is clear that all life originates with God. Yet the Hebrew scripture offers no specific understanding of the origin of individual souls, of when and how they become attached to specific bodies, or of their potential existence, apart from the body, after death. The reason for this is that, as we noted at the beginning, the Hebrew Bible does not present a theory of the soul developed much beyond the simple concept of a force associated with respiration, hence, a life-force."[71][full citation needed]
  3. ^ In the New Testament, "soul" (orig. ψυχή ) retains its basic Hebrew sense of meaning. "Soul" refers to one's life: Herod sought Jesus' soul (Matt. 2:20); one might save a soul or take it (Mark 3:4); death occurs when God "requires your soul" (Luke 12:20).
  4. ^ For Avicenna's views, see: Moussa, Dunya, & Zayed (1960);[101] Arberry (1964);[102] Michot (1986);[103] Janssen (1987);[104] Marmura (2005)(complete translation).[105]

Notes

  1. ^ Marshall Fredericks (2003). "GCVM History and Mission". Greater Cleveland Veteran’s Memorial, Inc. Archived from the original on 16 February 2009. Retrieved 14 January 2009.
  2. required.)
  3. ^ Berthold, Emma (10 September 2018). "The animals that can live forever". Curious. Retrieved 20 September 2023.
  4. ^ "7 Immortal Animals That Can Basically Live Forever". Reader's Digest. Retrieved 20 September 2023.
  5. ^ "We'll be uploading our entire minds to computers by 2045 and our bodies will be replaced by machines within 90 years, Google expert claims "Kurzweil"". Retrieved 30 December 2021.
  6. ^ Hentrich, Michael (September 2015). "Artificial Neural Command Theory (American English) (US)". Retrieved 11 May 2016.
  7. ^ a b c Perkins 1984, pp. 17–18.
  8. ^ a b af Hällström 1988, pp. 9–10.
  9. ^ Endsjø 2023, pp. 2–5, 28–30, 110–12.
  10. ^ Cullmann 1955.
  11. ^ Alexander 2003, pp. 5–10.
  12. ^ Bolonkin 2010, pp. 2–7.
  13. ^ a b Rohde 1925.
  14. ^ Endsjø 2023, pp. 28–30, 33–39.
  15. ^ Theophrastus Paracelsus. The Book of the Revelation of Hermes. 16th century
  16. ^ Zorea 2017, pp. 35–39.
  17. ^ Endsjø 2023, pp. 88–100.
  18. ^ Alexander 2003, pp. 45–57.
  19. ^ Bolonkin 2010, pp. 72–83.
  20. ]
  21. ^ Garreau, Joel (31 October 2007). "The Invincible Man". The Washington Post. p. C‑01.
  22. ^ "Classification of diseases functioning and disability". 23 July 2021.
  23. League of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies
    .
  24. ^ "What is Aging?". Retrieved 6 November 2020.
  25. PMID 15520642
    .
  26. ^ Wade, Nicholas (26 January 2017). "New Prospects for Growing Human Replacement Organs in Animals". The New York Times. Retrieved 3 March 2018.
  27. ^ "Aging and Death in an Organism That Reproduces by Morphologically Symmetric Division" (PDF).
  28. ^ "Bacteria Death Reduces Human Hopes of Immortality". New Scientist magazine, issue 2485. 5 February 2005. p. 19. Retrieved 2 April 2007.
  29. ^ a b Gilbert, Scott F. (2006). "Cheating Death: The Immortal Life Cycle of Turritopsis". Archived from the original on 21 November 2015. Retrieved 14 June 2009.
  30. ^ "'Immortal' jellyfish swarming across the world". London: Telegraph Media Group. 30 January 2009. Archived from the original on 30 January 2009. Retrieved 14 June 2009.
  31. ^ ""Immortal" Jellyfish Swarm World's Oceans". news.nationalgeographic.com. 29 January 2009. Archived from the original on 2 February 2009. Retrieved 19 August 2017.
  32. ^ Gilberson, Lance, Zoology Lab Manual, 4th edition. Primis Custom Publishing. 1999.
  33. ^ "Hail the Hydra, an Animal That May Be Immortal". Live Science. Retrieved 19 August 2017.
  34. ^ Clark, W.R. 1999. A Means to an End: The biological basis of aging and death. New York: Oxford University Press. "A Means to an End - Why do we age? Is aging inevitable? Questions and Answers are available here by downloading a sample chapter of WR Clark's book. The WRClark Site also features a chat room for you to ask your questions about aging". Archived from the original on 11 May 2008. Retrieved 25 May 2008. About telomeres and programmed cell death.
  35. ^ Harrison, Principles of Internal Medicine, Ch. 69, "Cancer cell biology and angiogenesis", Robert G. Fenton and Dan L. Longo, p. 454.
  36. ^ Williams, G.C. 1957. Pleiotropy, natural selection and the evolution of senescence. Evolution, 11:398–411. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 July 2006. Retrieved 23 July 2006.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) Paper in which Williams describes his theory of antagonistic pleiotropy.
  37. ^ Kirkwood, T.B.L. 1977. Evolution of aging. Nature, 270: 301–304. [1] Origin of the disposable soma theory.
  38. S2CID 35719466
    .
  39. ^ Alleyne, Richard (20 November 2008). "Scientists take a step closer to an elixir of youth". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 1 December 2008. Retrieved 5 May 2010.
  40. ^ Robert A. Freitas Jr., Microbivores: Artificial Mechanical Phagocytes using Digest and Discharge Protocol, self-published, 2001 [2]
  41. ]
  42. ^ Richard P. Feynman (December 1959). "There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom". Archived from the original on 11 February 2010. Retrieved 1 March 2010.
  43. ^ Sandberg, Anders; Boström, Nick (2008). Whole Brain Emulation: A roadmap (PDF). Future of Humanity Institute. Technical Report. Vol. #2008-3. Oxford University. Retrieved 5 April 2009.
  44. ^ Ruparel, Bhavik (30 July 2018). "On achieving immortality". Iva.to. Retrieved 10 September 2018.
  45. ^ Melbourne, Dr Alan Lai, University of (12 September 2017). "Part human, part robot: The future of medical implantables". Pursuit. Retrieved 2 January 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  46. The Great Ideas: A Syntopicon of Great Books of the Western World. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica. p. 788. {{cite book}}: |author= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link
    )
  47. The Great Ideas: A Syntopicon of Great Books of the Western World. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica. p. 784. {{cite book}}: |author= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link
    )
  48. ^ Acts 23:6–8
  49. ^ Philippians 3:20–21
  50. ^ Romans 6:4
  51. ^ Van Biema, David (7 February 2008). "Christians Wrong About Heaven, Says Bishop". Time. Archived from the original on 9 February 2008. Retrieved 5 May 2010.
  52. .
  53. . Retrieved 4 May 2023.
  54. . Retrieved 23 January 2023.
  55. . Retrieved 23 January 2023.
  56. ^
    ISSN
    0039-3207.
  57. ^ "Disbelievers Will Go to Hell - My Religion Islam".
  58. ^ "Degrees and Levels of Paradise and Hell - Islam Question & Answer".
  59. ^ "The people of Hell will abide therein forever - Islam Question & Answer".
  60. ^ "Gender of Angels and do They Die? - Islam Question & Answer".
  61. ^ "Angels - Key beliefs in Islam - GCSE Religious Studies Revision - AQA - BBC Bitesize".
  62. ^ "The Make-Up of the Jinn and Their Common Attributes".
  63. ^ "Is al-Kihdr living on the face of the earth? - Islam Question & Answer".
  64. ^ "Who Was Al-Khadir? - Fiqh". 30 August 2022.
  65. ^ "Surah An-Nisa - 157".
  66. ^ "How Will Jesus Return? Born of a Virgin or from the Sky?".
  67. ^ "Who is the Dajjal? (Comprehensive Answer) - Islam Question & Answer".
  68. ^ "How long will Dajjal live on earth? – Your Guide to get to know the Quran". 31 December 2015.
  69. ^ "Notes". New English Translation. Biblical Studies Press. 2006. Note 23, for Gen 2:7.
  70. ^ Avery-Peck, Alan J. (2000). "Soul". In Neusner; et al. (eds.). The Encyclopedia of Judaism. p. 1343.
  71. ^ 2 Maccabees 7.11, 28
  72. ^ 1 Enoch. 61.2, 5.
  73. 2 Baruch
    . 50.2, 51.5.
  74. ^ Davies, P.R. (2000). "Death, resurrection and life after death in the Qumran Scrolls". In Avery-Peck, Alan J.; Neusner, Jacob (eds.). Judaism in Late Antiquity. Vol. Part Four: Death, life-after-death, resurrection, and the World-to-Come in the Judaisms of antiquity. Leiden. p. 209.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  75. ^ Josephus. Antiquities of the Jews. 18.16; Matthew 22.23; Mark 12.18; Luke 20.27; Acts 23.8
  76. ^ Acts 23.8
  77. ^ Josephus. Jewish War. 2.8.14; cf.
    Josephus. Antiquities of the Jews. 8.14–15.
  78. ^ Book of Jubilees. 23.31.
  79. ^ a b Maharishi Mahesh Yogi on the Bhagavad-Gita, a New Translation and Commentary, Chapter 1–6. Penguin Books, 1969, pp. 94–95 (v 15)
  80. ^ "vallalar.org". vallalar.org. 7 July 2010. Retrieved 4 November 2010.
  81. .
  82. ^ Rangdrol & Matthieu 2001, p. 153.
  83. ^ a b Emma and Ludwig Edelstein, Asclepius: Collection and Interpretation of the Testimonies, Volume 1, Page 51
  84. ^ a b Sabine G. MacCormack Concise Encyclopedia of Greek and Roman Mythology p.47
  85. ^ a b Theony Condos, Star Myths of the Greeks and Romans, p.141
  86. ^ Endsjø, Greek Resurrection Beliefs, 54-64; cf. Finney, Resurrection, Hell and the Afterlife, 13-20.
  87. N.T. Wright
    , The Resurrection of the Son of God (2003), p.53
  88. ^ Parallel Lives, Life of Romulus 28:4-6
  89. ^ Collins, Adela Yarbro (2009), "Ancient Notions of Transferal and Apotheosis", pp 46,51
  90. ^ Justin Martyr. First Apology. 21.
  91. ^ Hoshang, J. Bhadha, Dr. (nd). "Effect of wearing cap on Zarathustri Urvaan". Zoroastrianism. topic 33. Archived from the original on 27 July 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  92. .
  93. ^ Maspero, Henri. Translated by Frank A. Kierman, Jr. Taoism and Chinese Religion (University of Massachusetts Press, 1981), p. 211.
  94. ^ Robinet, Isabelle. Taoism: Growth of a Religion (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997 [original French 1992]), p. 3–4.
  95. ^ Translated by Legge, James. The Texts of Taoism. 1962, Dover Press. NY.
  96. ^ "Alcmaeon". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. 2021.
  97. ^ "Plato". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. 2017.
  98. ^ Henry, D. (2008) "The Neoplatonic Achilles" in "The Achilles of Rationalist Psychology". Springer. Volume 7 of the series Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind pp. 59–74.
  99. ^ "Byzantine Philosophy". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab. Stanford University. 2018.
  100. ^ Moussa, Mohammad Youssef; Dunya, Solayman; Zayed, Sa'id, eds. (1960). Avicenna's Metaphysics: Al-Shifâ', Al-Ilâhiyyât. Vol. II. Cairo, EG: Organisme Général des Imprimeries Gouvernementales. pp. 431–432.
  101. ^ Aspects of Islamic Civilization. Translated by Arberry, A.J. London, UK: George Allen & Unwin. 1964. p. 153.
  102. ^ Michot, Jean R. (1986). La destinée de l'homme selon Avicenne. Louvain: Peeters. pp. 22–56, esp. 26–27, 43.
  103. ^ Janssen, J. (1987). "Ibn Sînâ's ideas of ultimate realities, neoplatonism and the Qur'ân as problem-solving paradigms in the Avicennian system". Ultimate Reality and Meaning. 10: 259–261.
  104. ^ Marmura, Michael (2005). Avicenna: The metaphysics of the healing. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press.
  105. ^ "Saint Thomas Aquinas". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. 2018.
  106. ^ Rozemond, M. (2010). "Descartes and the Immortality of the Soul". in Mind, Method and Morality: Essays in Honor of Anthony Kenny. Oxford University Press.
  107. ^ "Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. 2020.
  108. ^ Sassen, B. (2008). "Kant and Mendelssohn on the Implications of the 'I Think' ".in "The Achilles of Rationalist Psychology". Springer. Volume 7 of the series Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind pp. 59–74.
  109. ^ a b Kagan, Shelly (2012). Death. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. pp. 238–246.
    Kagan notes that his argument is an adaptation of a similar argument given by the British philosopher B. Williams (1973).[111]
  110. ^ Williams, B. (1973). Problems of the Self.
  111. PMID 28108110
    , Database: CINAHL Complete]
  112. ^ He, Goodkind, Kowal, Wan, Daniel, Paul (March 2016). "An Aging World: 2015". International Population Reports: U.S. Census Bureau. 1 (16): 1–30. Retrieved 1 March 2018.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  113. ISSN 1357-6275
    .
  114. .
  115. .
  116. OCLC 1107015985.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: others (link
    )
  117. .
  118. .
  119. .
  120. ^ "Scientists' Open Letter on Aging". Retrieved 20 April 2015.
  121. ^ "A Single-Issue Political Party for Longevity Science". Fight Aging!. 27 July 2012. Retrieved 20 April 2015.
  122. ^ a b Pentaris, Panagiotis (2021). Dying in a transhumanist and posthuman society. Abingdon / New York: Routledge. p. 83.
  123. ^
    ISSN 1357-6275
    .
  124. ^ Huberman, Jenny (2022). "Funding Immortality: Making Futures in the Era of Techno-Philanthropy". Études sur la mort. 157 (1).
  125. ^ Wilson, Ralph F. "Peacock as an Ancient Christian Symbol of Eternal Life". Jesus Walk Bible Study Series. Retrieved 18 January 2011.

References

  • Rangdrol, Shabkar Tsogdruk; Matthieu, Richard, tr. (2001). The Life of Shabkar: The Autobiography of a Tibetan Yogin. Ithaca, New York: Snow Lion Publications.
    ISBN 978-1559391542.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link
    )

Further reading

External links

Religious and spiritual prospects for immortality

In literature