Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/June-2023

Promoted File:Philippe Chaperon by Atelier Nadar.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Female cardinal butterfly

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2023 at 20:59:44 (UTC)

Reason

High quality large image. FP on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Argynnis pandora

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:59, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:19, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 18:55, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 12:07, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Choliamb (talk) 23:13, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Aviafanboi (talk) 14:40, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Cardinal (Argynnis pandora) female underside Dobruja.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:02, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Male hairy dragonfly

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2023 at 21:07:44 (UTC)

Reason

High quality large image. FP on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Hairy dragonfly

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:07, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:19, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 18:54, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 12:08, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Choliamb (talk) 23:15, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Aviafanboi (talk) 14:39, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Hairy dragonfly (Brachytron pratense) male Burren.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:09, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Sagan and a Viking lander

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2023 at 16:21:46 (UTC)

Reason

High quality photo

Articles in which this image appears

Carl Sagan, Viking program

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Getting there

Creator

NASA/JPL, photo from the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum collection

• Support as nominator – Artem.G (talk) 16:21, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Sadly, a LOT of compression artifacts. A better version must exist somewhere... --Janke | Talk 16:33, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Not going to lie - I'm very disappointed that I was unable to find anything better online. This appears to be from the same event, but the LOC is not actually indicating whether the photographer was officially with NASA/JPL (and thus the image is free) or if he was a private-sector photographer who happened to be there (and thus non-free). It's a shame, too - this is an excellent image.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:07, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  LoC photo is credited to Bill Ray here [2]. Artem.G (talk) 14:22, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  It's also credited to him on the LOC page. It doesn't specify anything that would help us determine whether the image is free. For comparison, the images Pete Souza took for the White House would be PD, but anything he's done in the private sector are copyrighted unless released under a copyleft license.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:49, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Withdrawing nomination. I wasn't able to find a clearer photo, and though it's a great photo its quality is mediocre at best. Artem.G (talk) 13:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:11, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Withdrawn nomination. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:11, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lesser violetear

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2023 at 21:14:38 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image. FP on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Lesser violetear

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:14, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:19, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 18:53, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – DreamSparrow ^Chat 19:22, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 12:09, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Snehrashmi (talk) 03:57, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Choliamb (talk) 11:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Lesser violetear (Colibri cyanotus cabanidis).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:15, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sergei Prokofiev

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2023 at 14:03:48 (UTC)

Reason

Another great Bain image of a composer with a high EV

Articles in which this image appears

Sergei Prokofiev, his symphonies 1 and 2, War and Peace (opera), Music of the Soviet Union

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment

Creator

Bain News Service, uploaded by Materialscientist

• Support as nominator – MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 14:03, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Looks like Prokofiev was not sitting still for the camera. Not quite sure how I feel about it; for 1918, I can forgive it, but at the same time it is a major flaw in the image.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:43, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• (ec) Comment – I was about to say the same thing when Chris's comment went up. At small sizes this looks okay, but at higher resolutions the face is pretty badly out of focus, so much so that I think it probably fails to meet the criteria for FP. Prokofiev was photographed a lot, so I would think that it shouldn't be too hard to find a better image. But then I haven't actually tried, and the number of photos without copyright restrictions may be much smaller than I imagine. Choliamb (talk) 15:51, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a series, these two looks sharper File:Sergei Prokofiev 04.jpg and File:Prokofieff (i.e. Prokofiev) LCCN2014708412.jpg, and these two are out of focus File:Prokofieff (i.e. Prokofiev) LCCN2014708410.jpg, File:Sergei Prokofiev 03.jpg

• File:Sergei Prokofiev 04.jpg is a nice image... a recrop (current crop is too close on the shoes) might be featurable — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see then, I'll get started on File:Sergei Prokofiev 04.jpg and reupload the original. Withdrawing nomination. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 12:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Crisco 1492 and @Choliamb, thoughts on this crop? I tried following what File:Sergei Prokofiev 04.jpg did by keeping the fireplace in frame, but it may be odd having him off center. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 16:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MyCatIsAChonk: I may be wrong, but I don't think that's what Chris had in mind when he mentioned recropping. I suspect he was suggesting that you go back to the original full version of no. 4 from the Library of Congress (File:Prokofieff (i.e. Prokofiev) LCCN2014708419.tif) and make a more generous crop than the one by Materialscientist that you originally linked to (File:Sergei Prokofiev 04.jpg), which is very tight at the bottom. It's a good full-length portrait and worth preserving, rather than cutting him off at the thighs, which to me at least looks a little odd (although maybe that's because I've already seen the original). Cheers, Choliamb (talk) 21:28, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Yeah, I was thinking more like File:Prokofieff (i.e. Prokofiev) LCCN2014708419 Crop 2.tif (I'm a sucker for full portraits). If we were to go for a 3/4 crop, I'd definitely want more space by the elbows to give him some breathing room.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  That makes more sense, I'll get started soon. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 01:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @Crisco 1492, just uploaded a restored version. Before I send it to FPC, what're your thoughts? MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 02:25, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @MyCatIsAChonk, that looks excellent. I'd definitely support that.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:04, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing in favor of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Prokofieff (i.e. Prokofiev) LCCN2014708419 Crop 2.jpg. MER-C 11:26, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted MER-C 11:26, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

David Livingstone

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2023 at 00:31:31 (UTC)

Reason

This is one of the most stunningly detailed photos I've seen in a while - probably need to look at George N. Barnard or Mathew Brady et al. to get similar. While that does definitely make the narrow focus planes of 1860s cameras a little more obvious, this is stunningly well reproduced. Admittedly, there was A. a drop in quality when the long exposure cameras gave way to the quicker exposure ones, so the 1860s is a bit of a sweet spot as that goes, but also B. the quality of prints from the photos generally wasn't as good as this - the recent George N. Barnard photo shows others could do it, but it was rarer and certainly not in wide-distribution prints like cabinet cards. Anyway, restoration notes on the file description page.

Any suggestions, leave 'em here, I'm going to bed and will review them in the morning. I find image restoration a good treatment for anxiety, so, yet again, Wikipedia benefits from my stress and panic. But now that I'm done - Sleep.

Articles in which this image appears

David Livingstone +3

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Religious figures, I guess?

Creator

Thomas Annan, restored by Adam Cuerden

• Support as nominator –
  FPs. 00:31, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support – a few spots in top right corner? Bammesk (talk) 03:01, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Uploading a fix now.
    FPs. 07:16, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:25, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Historically notable; face shows strong character. – Sca (talk) 12:40, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• I completely agree with you. I am new around, not a professional user in the field of image reviewing, and just have relative knowledge about the topic. The image, which is taken in 1864, seems totally solid, completely worthy, and is certainly adequate for being a "Featured picture". – Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:34, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Bremps... 14:19, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 11:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Snehrashmi (talk) 03:55, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Choliamb (talk) 23:11, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:David Livingstone by Thomas Annan.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:29, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sitar, late 19th Century

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2023 at 16:16:44 (UTC)

Reason

Good quality

Articles in which this image appears

Sitar (infobox photo)

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment

Creator

unknown, MET museum

• Support as nominator – Artem.G (talk) 16:16, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Below the minimum threshhold of 1,500 px on the one side. Which is a shame, too, because this is a beautiful example. If only the MET had released the original resolution of the file. 13:53, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

(Unsigned entry by Crisco 1492)

• Thanks, Janke. Signed now.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:28, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:41, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Brett Kissel

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2023 at 13:49:18 (UTC)

Canada Summer Games

Reason

Dynamic image of a performer on stage - he still plays his guitar raised over his head like this during concerts

Articles in which this image appears

Brett Kissel +2 lists

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment

Creator

Matt Duboff on Flickr

• Support as nominator –  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:49, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's a surprising number of white specks at the bottom of the image. Was this a film photo?

FPs. 01:04, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

It's not a film photo. It was shot with this. The specks might be dead camera sensor pixels?! They can be removed. Bammesk (talk) 01:14, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'd have to look at the layout of the venue, but they could be phone screens or something similar. Whenever I had dead pixels they wouldn't really blur into the background like that.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:08, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, looking on a PC I'm seeing a couple that are certainly dead pixels (right above his arm, near the hat). I can deal with these after I get home from the office.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:56, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

•  Done — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Support There's arguably still a bluish dead pixel on his butt, though.

  FPs. 11:21, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

  ]

• Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:08, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:32, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:32, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Garlic

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 09:56:17 (UTC)

Reason

Featured on Commons last week. Illustrates article well.

Articles in which this image appears

Garlic

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Others

Creator

Ivar Leidus

• Support as nominator – MER-C 09:56, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:08, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support I'm not sure this is Leidus' best work, but his very good is still excellent.
  FPs. 01:08, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Choliamb (talk) 15:31, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Garlic bulbs and cloves.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:21, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Three-spot grass yellow/2

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 09:59:37 (UTC)

Phuket, Thailand

Reason

High quality large image. FP on Commons. Nominated July 22. Received 4 support votes; no opposes.

Articles in which this image appears

Eurema blanda

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:52, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Timer reset due to delayed transclusion (was going to nominate this myself). MER-C 09:57, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:07, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support
  FPs. 01:10, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support – Choliamb (talk) 13:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Three-spot grass yellow (Eurema blanda blanda) underside Phuket.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:26, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Red-whiskered bulbul/2

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 09:59:37 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image. FP on Commons. Nominated in Jan 2023; received 3 support votes; no opposes.

Articles in which this image appears

Red-whiskered bulbul

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Timer reset due to delayed transclusion. MER-C 09:57, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Choliamb (talk) 13:06, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - can something be done about the ca. 3-pixel wide halo seen mainly on head and left of body? Looks like a masking artifact (maybe during de-noising the sky?) --Janke | Talk 19:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Focus is on tail, should be on the head. And too dark, exposure should be added. --Petar Milošević (talk) 09:51, 22 June 2023 (UTC)--Petar Milošević (talk) 09:51, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Focus is on the head. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Good EV and I find the focus to be proper as well --Muhammad(talk) 17:01, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:28, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Viperine water snake (Natrix maura)/2

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 09:59:37 (UTC)

Reason

High quality large image. FP on Commons. Nominated June 22 by TheFreeWorld. Received 4 support votes; no opposes.

Articles in which this image appears

Natrix maura

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:47, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Timer reset due to delayed transclusion. MER-C 09:57, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:07, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support
  FPs. 01:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:30, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:30, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sol de Mañana 2018

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 11:48:07 (UTC)

Reason

It's a high quality image that depicts most components of the fumarole field in one photo: There is a steam vent along with rising steam, a mud pool with grey mud in the centre, several ponds of hot water rimmed by yellow sulfur deposits. One also sees the brown and white rocks, colours originating presumably from hydrothermal alteration.

Articles in which this image appears

Sol de Mañana

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes

Creator

Kallerna

• Support as nominator – Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:48, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:20, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment The panorama may have more EV Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:55, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  In the panorama the fine details are less visible, though. Especially the mud pools and steam emission. Also, maybe it's just me but it seems like there is a weird distortion in the middle. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 20:57, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Thanks for the nomination! —kallerna 06:40, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – --Janke | Talk 19:49, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 17:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Aviafanboi (talk) 13:51, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Sol de Mañana 2018.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:34, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anemonoides blanda

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 16:58:03 (UTC)

Reason

Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously.

Articles in which this image appears

Anemonoides blanda

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Flowers

Creator

Reinhold Möller

• Support as nominator – MER-C 16:58, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 18:13, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:02, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Choliamb (talk) 15:36, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Snehrashmi (talk) 02:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Nythar (💬-🍀) 20:18, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Balkan Windröschen (Anemone blanda)-20230407-RM-124525.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:23, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ludwig van Beethoven

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 18:01:19 (UTC)

Reason

appropriate quality

Articles in which this image appears

Ludwig van Beethoven, Joseph Karl Stieler, etc.

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment

Creator

Joseph Karl Stieler (painter; 1781–1858)

• Support as nominator – Hamid Hassani (talk) 18:01, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Resolution is below the minimum, and far below the resolution threshhold that's been common for painting nominations. I'm also not sure on the colours - the pure white on Beethoven's forehead looks like blown highlights, for example. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:02, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  There's a version on Google Art Project. A moment.

  FPs. 00:38, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

  ]

• Support alt 1. Alt 1 looks much better.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:03, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• @
  FPs. 00:48, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• @Adam Cuerden: Thank you indeed for uploading this much larger, clearer image. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 07:04, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Alt 1, much better. The file description is missing the author: Joseph Karl Stieler. Bammesk (talk) 01:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Fixed. It was sort of there, just a bad typo ( {{Creator| instead of {{Creator: )

  FPs. 09:29, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

  ]

• Comment Oppose – Well, I'm not sure about against altering the saturation in this very famous portrait. The Joseph Karl Stieler article notes that it's "possibly Stieler's most reproduced work," and indeed it's been reproduced zillions of times (including on a CD I have of the Ninth Symphony by the Leipzig Gewandhaus Orchestra). One tends to think the Beethoven House in Bonn's version would be authoritative. As to which is more 'lifelike,' that's not the point. For encyclopedic purposes, it's which is more accurate? (FWIW, German Wiki also uses the orig.) – Sca (talk) 13:21, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  The Google Art Project is the same as on the museum's website

  FPs. 15:17, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

  ]

  Not to mention that this is an entirely different digitization than the one originally nominated.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:54, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Alt 1 – Choliamb (talk) 15:34, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Alt 1 Artem.G (talk) 06:57, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• comment the only problem with Alt 1 is that it's not used in any article... Artem.G (talk) 07:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Alta get switched in on promotion

  FPs. 10:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

  ]

• Support Alt 1 --Janke | Talk 19:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support alt 1. MER-C 11:20, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Joseph Karl Stieler's Beethoven mit dem Manuskript der Missa solemnis.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:26, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Theodore von Kármán at Arnold Air Force Base

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 12:25:13 (UTC)

Reason

High quality photo

Articles in which this image appears

Theodore von Kármán, SM-65 Atlas, AGARD-B, AGARD

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Vehicles/Air or maybe Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Engineering and technology/Weaponry

Creator

U.S. Air Force

• Support as nominator – Artem.G (talk) 12:25, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - There is minor damage to the image. Restoration should be quick and painless, but should be done before featuring this image. Aside from that... this is a very well staged picture, and honestly it probably has more EV for the two testing models.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:05, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I can do it if you don't feel like it.

  FPs. 01:06, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

  ]

  I haven't restored anything in ages. I can have a go tonight, though. It should only take a few minutes.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:05, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• ALT 1 uploaded, support ALT 1 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:38, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

great, thanks for the restoration. I'll also support clean version. Artem.G (talk) 06:56, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Alt 1 – What a great photo. When I was growing up in the 1960s and making plastic models of Sealab and Mercury space capsules, this is exactly what I thought working at NASA would look like. Choliamb (talk) 15:28, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support ALT 1 – Bammesk (talk) 01:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Alt 1 – --Janke | Talk 19:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support alt 1. MER-C 17:49, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Theodore von Kármán 230419-F-F3405-0001 (restored).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Považský hrad

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2023 at 21:22:13 (UTC)

Reason

Good EV, nice quality, good composition, FP on Commons

Articles in which this image appears

Považský hrad

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture

Creator

Ximonic

• Support as nominator – Tomer T (talk) 21:22, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Question - The other images in the article make it look like there's more to the castle. Is this just a different piece, or is it the angle, or...? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:43, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• I checked the site on Google Earth and although the details weren't clear, I am pretty sure the nom image is shot with the camera pointing east, and the infobox image is the other side of the same dwelling with the camera pointing west. Bammesk (talk) 01:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Okay, thanks.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:41, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a great shot, technically, but (at thumbnail size, at least) it doesn't really look like a castle. The other images have higher EV in my view.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:41, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kinda have to agree about angles here. It's a quality image, and I'm glad we have it, but... Weak support. If it was part of a set shot at different angles, it'd be clearer.

FPs. 13:01, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

• Support — Aviafanboi (talk) 13:50, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support — Vinícius O. (talk) 18:30, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]