M3 half-track

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Carrier, Personnel, Half-track, M3
armored personnel carrier
Place of originUnited States
Service history
WarsWorld War II
Chinese Civil War
1948 Arab–Israeli War
Greek Civil War
Korean War
First Indochina War
Costa Rican Civil War
Vietnam War
Laotian Civil War
Algerian War[1]
Cambodian Civil War
Suez Crisis
1958 Lebanon crisis
Six-Day War
1973 Arab–Israeli War
Lebanese Civil War
Salvadoran Civil War
Nicaraguan Revolution
Production history
Designed1940–1941
ManufacturerAutocar
Diamond T
White Motor Company
Unit cost$10,310[2]
Produced1941-1945
No. built53,000 (including variants)
Specifications
Mass17,650 pounds (8.01 t) (M3),
18,425 pounds (8.357 t) (M3A1)
Length20 ft 3 in (6.17 m) with roller
Width7 ft 3.5 in (2.223 m)
Height7 ft 5 in (2.26 m)
Crew1
Passengers12

Armor6–12 mm (0.25–0.50 in)
Main
armament
.30 caliber Browning M1919A4 machine gun (M3, M3A1),
.50 caliber Browning M2HB machine gun (M3A1)
EngineWhite 160AX
148 hp (110 kW) at 3,000 rpm
Power/weight18.5 hp/metric ton (M3),
17.7 hp/metric ton (M3A1)
TransmissionSpicer 3461 constant mesh
SuspensionFront: semi-elliptic longitudinal leaf spring
Rear: Vertical volute spring
Fuel capacity60 US gallons (230 litres)
Operational
range
200 mi (320 km)
Maximum speed 45 mph (72 km/h) on road

The M3 half-track was an American

armored personnel carrier half-track widely used by the Allies during World War II and in the Cold War. Derived from the M2 half-track car
, the M3 was extensively produced, with about 15,000 standard M3s and more than 38,000 variant units manufactured.

The M3 was extensively modified with several dozen variant designs produced for different purposes. During World War II, the M3 and its variants were supplied to the

British Commonwealth and Soviet Red Army forces, serving on all major fronts throughout the war. The M3 and its variants were produced by many manufacturers including Diamond T, White Motor Company, and Autocar. They were adapted for a wide variety of uses, such as a self-propelled anti-aircraft weapon or self-propelled artillery
. Although initially unpopular due to its lack of significant armor or a roof to protect the crew from shrapnel, it was used by most of the Allies during the war.

In the Cold War era, the vehicle was used by a variety of state and non-state operators in conflicts in South America, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia, remaining in service until as late as the mid-1990s.

Specifications

The M3 half-track was 20 ft 3 in (6.17 m) long, 7 ft 3.5 in (2.223 m) wide, 7 ft 5 in (2.26 m) high and had a gross weight of either 17,650 pounds (8.01 t) (M3) or 18,425 pounds (8.357 t) (M3A1). The wheelbase was 135.5 in (3.44 m) long. The suspension consists of a leaf spring for the two front wheels, while the rear treads had vertical volute springs. With a fuel capacity of 60 US gallons (230 L), the M3 could carry its crew (one driver) and a squad of 12 soldiers 220 miles (350 km) before refueling, while protecting them from small arms with light armor (6–12 mm of armor[3]). The vehicle was powered by a 148 hp (110 kW) White 160AX, 386 in3 (6,330 cc), 6-cylinder gasoline engine.[4][5]

Design

The design, which used many commercial components to improve reliability and the rate of production, was standardized in 1940 and built by the Autocar Company, Diamond T Motor Company, and the White Motor Company.[6] With a White 160AX engine, the M3 was driven through a manual constant-mesh (non-synchromesh) transmission with four forward and one reverse gear, as well as a two-speed transfer case. The front suspension uses leaf springs, while the tracks use vertical volute springs. Braking was hydraulic assisted while steering was manual. Onboard electronics run on a 12-volt system.[3] The vehicle uses two tracks made of molded rubber over steel cabling with metal track guides.[7]

Infantry rifles were held in brackets behind the seats while ammunition and rations were generally stored underneath. In 1942, the vehicles were fitted with small racks for land mines on the outside of the hull, just above the tracks. In combat, many squads found it necessary to stow additional rations, rucksacks and other crew stowage on the outside of the vehicle. Luggage racks were often added in the field, and later vehicles were fitted with rear-mounted racks for this purpose.[8]

Early vehicle had a

M2 Browning machine gun. The later M3A1 adopted a raised, armored "pulpit" mount for the .50-caliber machine gun over the front passenger seat, and additional mounts for .30-caliber (7.62 mm) machine guns along the sides of the passenger compartment. Many M3s were later converted to M3A1s. The vehicle body was fully armored, with an adjustable armored shutter for the engine radiator, and adjustable bulletproof panels with vision slits for the windshield, driver windows, and passenger windows.[9]

Development

On display in Ursel (Northwest of Ghent), Belgium

The development of an armored

M1919 machine guns and one M2 Browning machine gun operated by a crew of eight. Tests at Aberdeen Proving Ground in 1938 demonstrated unsatisfactory performance due to the front-wheel drive. The T7 was converted back into a scout car and returned to the Army.[10]

Throughout 1939 and 1940, the M2 half-track car was prototyped and developed by the Army at Aberdeen Proving Grounds. The M3 was developed as a larger version of the M2 equipped with two M1919 machine guns and an M2 Browning machine gun for combat usage. The M3 also added a rear door and five additional seats in the rear. The M3 was tested at Aberdeen Proving Grounds in the summer of 1941 and was accepted into service soon after.[11]

Service history

Rommel in Tunisia speaking with troops riding a captured American built M3 half-track during Battle of Kasserine Pass.

In US service, it was intended that the M3 would be issued to armored infantry regiments. It was also quickly put into action with the Provisional Tank Group when the Japanese Army began their invasion of the Philippines. At first, there were multiple complaints due to several mechanical difficulties. These were rectified by the Ordnance Department after receiving field reports from the Philippines. The M3s first use in its intended role was during Operation Torch. Each armored division had 433 M2s or M3s, 200 in the armored regiments and 233 in the armored infantry regiment.[12]

The half-tracks were initially unpopular and nicknamed "Purple Heart boxes" (a grim reference to the US Army decoration for combat wounds) by American troops. The chief complaints centered on the complete lack of overhead protection from artillery shells bursting overhead and that the armor was inadequate against machine gun fire. Omar Bradley quoted in his report about half-tracks that it was "a competent and dependable contrivance. Its bad name resulted from the inexperience of our troops who attempted to use it for too many things".[12] Another major issue with the M3 was its fixed rear idler, which often broke on rough terrain. Commanders in North Africa bought parts to build spring-loaded rear idlers that could handle the rough terrain, which the Ordnance Department then approved as an official fix.[13][14] In 1943, the M3 served in Sicily and Italy and received positive reports of it in action. It operated in Operation Overlord and served in Europe for the remainder of the war.[15]

The vehicle was generally considered very mechanically reliable, although there were two major complaints: the vehicle had a wide turning radius and lacked power steering, the latter especially evident when using narrow European streets. The unique design of the track, made up of steel bands with a rubber contact surface vulcanized to them, made replacement difficult; if the track became damaged or the steel bands stretched out, the entire track had to be replaced. A track with replaceable blocks was suggested as an alternative.[16]

Total production of the M3 and its variants ran to nearly 54,000 vehicles.[17] To supply the Allied nations, International Harvester produced several thousand of a very similar vehicle, the M5 half-track, for Lend-Lease.[18]

Variants

Armored personnel carriers

  • M3 – White and Autocar half-track with White 386 in3 (6,330 cc) 160AX engine. Fitted with either an M32 anti-aircraft machine gun mount or a pedestal mount, both featuring an M2HB machine gun.[3]
    • M3A1 – A M3 with the improved M49 machine gun ring mount over the right hand front seat. Between 1942 and 1943 all M3 half-tracks (standard and A1s) were continually upgraded. These improvements included a number of drive train, engine, and stowage improvements.[3]
    • T29/M3A2 – Developed in 1943 to combine features such that existing M2 and M3 production could be switched to a common vehicle. The need for additional half-tracks was not as large as predicted, and the M3A2 was never built.[3]
  • The M5 personnel carrier
    M3E2/M5 half-track – International Harvester half-track, externally largely identical to the M3, but with 450 in3 (7,400 cc),[3] IHC RED-450-B engine, different drive train and fuel and electrical system. The chassis, bogies, track, idler and drive sprockets, wheels, winches, transfer case, rollers, and machine gun mount are interchangeable with the M3. The M5 was heavier than the M3, due in part to heavier armor. The body of the vehicle was welded, rather than bolted. The M5 was primarily built for Lend-Lease to the European allies.[19]
    • M5A1 – Similar to the M3A1, the M5A1 was an M5 with the M49 machine gun mount. It could fit one .50-caliber (12.7 mm) and two .30-caliber (30.06) machine guns.[19] The IHC models had a slightly lower top speed (only 42 mph (68 km/h)) and lower range (125 mi (201 km)).[3]
    • T31/M5A2 – Similar in principle to the M3A2, the M5A2 was a vehicle developed by the US Ordnance Department to combine the production of the M5 and M9 into a single vehicle. As with the M3A2, the project was never needed, and was never produced.[20]
    • M9 half-track – Same body as the M5, but with stowage arranged as in the M2 half-track car, access to radios from inside (as opposed to outside) and rear doors, plus an pedestal MG mount.[19]
    • M9A1 – Same as M9, with ring mount and three MG pintles.[19]

Self-propelled guns

A M3 GMC on the Bougainville Island, in the Solomon Islands, November 1943
A T48 57 mm GMC / SU-57 in the Museum of the Great Patriotic War, Poklonnaya Hill Victory Park

Anti-aircraft variants

  • T1E4/
    M13 Half-track – M3 based Multiple Gun Motor Carriage equipped with the Maxson M33 mount with two M2HB machine guns (5,000 rounds). The T1E4 prototypes had the hull sides removed for ease of working with the mount. These were reintroduced on production M13s. This was a development of previous T1s that had all been based on the M2 half-track car.[28]
    • M14 Half-track – M13 MGMC variant, based on the M5 chassis. Supplied under lend-lease to Britain (5,000 rounds).[28]
An M16 MGMC in action in Korea, 1953

40 mm experiments

Various attempts were made to mate the

40 mm Bofors L/50 gun to the M3 chassis. In most cases the weapon's recoil was too severe or the mounting too heavy, and the attempts were finally stopped with the adoption of the M19 MGMC on the M24 light tank chassis.[35]

Post-war Israeli variants

An Israeli modified M3 Half-track, armed with a 20 mm cannon
  • M3 Mk. A (M3 Degem Alef) – M5 APC. Israeli Half-tracks were all designated M3, even M2/M9 variants and known as Zachlam זחל"ם in Hebrew. The Mk. An APCs were identified as IHC M5s by the use of RED-450 engines for the most part. While the M49 mount was retained, a variety of machine guns were used.[38]
  • M3 Mk. B (M3 Degem Bet) – M5 converted as a command carrier with extra radios and a front winch bumper. Mk. Bs featured M2HB machine guns.[38]
  • M3 Mk. C (M3 Degem Gimel) – Similar to M21 MMC, an M3 type (assumed from the common use of the White 160AX engine) Half-track with an M1 81 mm Mortar.[38] Development began in 1950. A prototype underwent trials in December 1951. First vehicles were issued to units in September 1953.[39]
  • M3 Mk. D (M3 Degem Dalet) – Another M3 based mortar carrier, fitted with the 120 mm Soltam mortar. Development began in 1952.[39] Entered service in 1960.[38]
  • M3 Mk. E (M3 Degem He) - M3 fitted with Krupp 75 mm gun. A single prototype was built by may 1951, underwent trials in July 1951 and again in August 1953. By 1955 IDF Artillery Corps lost interest in the project.[39]
  • M3 Mk. F (M3 Degem Waw) - A proposed configuration of M3 with two 20 mm anti-aircraft cannons. The project was abandoned in 1952 after a preliminary check.[39]
  • M3 TCM-20 – M3/M5 Half-tracks fitted with the Israeli
    TCM-20 armament turret with two 20 mm Hispano-Suiza HS.404 cannon fitted to old Maxson turrets. The right hand vision port was often replaced with a ball mount for a machine gun. They proved to be very effective fighting anti-tank missile teams; their cannons proved effective in forcing the teams to take cover or suppress them so they could not use their missiles accurately.[40]

Operators

Non-state former operators

See also

  • List of U.S. military vehicles by supply catalog designation
  • List of U.S. military vehicles by model number
  • Sd.Kfz. 251

References

Citations

  1. ^ Windrow (1997), p. 33.
  2. ^ Zaloga, Stephen J. M3 Infantry Half-Track 1940–73. Osprey Publishing
  3. ^ a b c d e f g Berndt (1993), p. 152.
  4. U.S. War Department (23 February 1944). TM 9-710 Basic Half-Track Vehicles (White, Autocar, and Diamond T). Washington, D.C. pp. 20, 133.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link
    )
  5. U.S. War Department (1 September 1943). TM 9-2800 Standard Military Motor Vehicles. Washington, D.C. pp. 30–33.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link
    )
  6. ^ a b Zaloga (1994), pp. 3–5
  7. ^ Mesko (1996), p. 8.
  8. ^ Zaloga (1994), p. 11
  9. ^ Zaloga (1994), pp. 6–7
  10. ^ Hunnicutt (2001), p. 25.
  11. ^ Hunnicutt (2001), p. 33.
  12. ^ a b Zaloga (1994), p. 8.
  13. ^ Zaloga (1994), p. 11.
  14. ^ Hunnicutt (2001), p. 40.
  15. ^ Zaloga (1994), pp. 15–16.
  16. ^ Moran, Nicholas (17 February 2018). "The Chieftain's Hatch: ETO Equipment Reviews". The Chieftain's Hatch. Wargaming. Retrieved 26 November 2021.
  17. ^ Zaloga (1994), p. 42
  18. ^ Zaloga (1994), p. 12.
  19. ^ a b c d Berndt (1993), p. 147.
  20. ^ Hunnicutt (2001), p. 52.
  21. ^ a b Hunnicutt (2001), p. 98.
  22. ^ a b c Zaloga (1994), pp. 36–37
  23. ^ Hunnicutt (2001), p. 112.
  24. ^ a b Hunnicutt (2001), p. 96.
  25. ^ Hunnicutt (2001), p. 121.
  26. ^ Zaloga (1994), pp. 35–36
  27. ^ Mesko (1996), p. 22.
  28. ^ a b Zaloga (1994), p. 38.
  29. ^ a b c d Hunnicutt (2001), pp. 123–126
  30. ^ a b c d e f g Zaloga (1994), p. 42.
  31. ^ "Hit-Run Ack-Ack Guns Mounted on a Half-Track". Popular Mechanics. New York, NY: Hearst Corporation. December 1943. Retrieved 3 August 2011. (including "cover artwork")
  32. ^ a b Berndt (1994), p. 33.
  33. ^ Hunnicutt (2001), p. 131.
  34. ^ Zaloga (1994), p. 39.
  35. ^ a b c d Gander (2013), p. 231.
  36. ^ a b Gander (2013), p. 232.
  37. ^ Hunnicutt (2001), p. 194.
  38. ^ a b c d Zaloga (1994), p. 24.
  39. ^ a b c d Brezner (1999), p. 172-3.
  40. ^ Zaloga (1994), p. 40.
  41. ISSN 1765-0828
    .
  42. .
  43. ^ "Rearming Austria: WWII weapons". wwiiafterwwii.wordpress.com. 14 June 2015.
  44. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Zaloga (1994), pp. 21–22.
  45. ^ Grandoloni (1998), p. 11.
  46. ^ a b c d e f "Trade Registers". Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Retrieved 23 April 2019.
  47. .
  48. ^ Zaloga (1994), p. 13.
  49. ^ Library of Congress. "El Salvador > Appendix". Country-data.com. Retrieved 3 August 2019.
  50. ^ Zaloga (1994), p. 23.
  51. .
  52. ^ Grandoloni (1998), p. 12.
  53. .
  54. .
  55. ^ "Een M16 half-track (half-track met een M55 vierlingmitrailleur) met personeel". NIMH beeldbank. 1955. Retrieved 8 February 2018.
  56. ISSN 0459-7222
    .
  57. ^ International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) (2021). "The Military Balance 2021". The Military Balance.
  58. .
  59. .
  60. ^ Grandoloni (1998), pp. 3–4.
  61. ^ Grandoloni (1998), pp. 8&16.
  62. ^ Bishop (1998), p. 81.
  63. ^ Abbott (2014), pp. 21–24
  64. ^ Kassis (2003), pp. 41–47.
  65. ^ Abi-Chahine (2019), p. 122.
  66. ^ Kassis (2003), pp. 85–89.
  67. ^ Kassis (2003), p. 63.

Bibliography

Further reading

External links