User talk:Wolverine XI/Archive 1
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Megacarnivore
December 2022
Hello, I'm UtherSRG. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Impala, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 12:26, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
146 very small edits
What, may I ask, was the point of making 146 small edits to your user page? UtherSRG (talk) 20:11, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
It's very simple, I'm trying to reach 500 edits so I can edit this protected page
- Which page? You can request edits on an article's talk page. UtherSRG (talk) 01:38, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
December 2022
Just a bit of a warning... your userpage is verging on the borders of what is grounds for deletion via
16:17, 22 December 2022 (UTC)- I suggest taking the 16:19, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
OK, I hear you, I deleted all my unnecessary personal info on my User page.
Your submission at Megaherbivores has been accepted
Thank you, I really appreciate it. I'll continue contributing to Wikipedia and make more articles. This means a lot to me and I'm grateful.
- Good job! I do suggest sticking with the AfC process for at least a few articles to get the hang of it. And I strongly suggest starting all new articles in the Draft namespace so that you have more freedom to put the articles together over time; an incomplete article in the main namespace may easily fall under a 11:59, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
January 2023
Hello, I'm Fieryninja. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Feminism seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fieryninja (talk) 21:58, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Walter Donaldson
Hi. I'm really confused - why have you created a second nomination for Walter Donaldson to FAC when it's already an FA, then pass the nomination and claim WikiCup points? Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:38, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, Upper20. At Walter Donaldson, you created a FAC page in Draft, then moved the Draft to a FAC page, and then indicated the article had been promoted by FACbot, when in fact, the article is already an FAC instructions so you can avoid doing something like this again? Regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:42, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Oh, sorry I didn't mean to cause any disturbances, I really didn't know what I was doing. OK I'll try reading the FAC instructions, again sorry for the disturbances.
Disambiguation link notification for January 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently been editing gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them which has been designated a
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the
Citation needed
Not sure why you see
- See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS; offering an example of similar elsewhere on Wikipedia isn't usually a good idea, as the example could be equally wrong (anyone can edit Wikipedia and it's full of policy-breaching stuff). But those articles don't seem to make the same mistakes, which are:
- List articles are just that, and the criteria for being on the list should be defined early on. See featured lists.
- Yours is an article making an outright claim that: "This is a list that contains 10 of the largest primate species (excluding humans". If you meant the article to be a synthesis, means that you took information from multiple sources and combined it to draw a conclusion not found in the sources. What source states that these particular ten are ten of the largest ?? That is, how can we verify there aren't ten others that are larger than these ten?
- List articles are just that, and the criteria for being on the list should be defined early on. See
- It can always be assumed (unless it's a FL, that lists are incomplete. The way you composed this article, the claim is that these are THE 10 larger, and there are no more larger, but that assertion is uncited.
- SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:11, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
So I should change the name to make it a
- Moving the article to a stand-alone list would be a first step. (I recommend that you personally refrain from moving articles until you have gained more experience, and instead seek assistance from related WikiProjects.) But the lead statement is still original research. The lead would need to define the criteria for list inclusion without making a statement about "10 largest", which is the original research/synthesis part that requires citation. If you consider what the criteria would be, then others will be able to make the necessary adjustments. More pressing is the question of whether you have taken this time to carefully re-read all of the links posted to you throughout your talk page; getting one article fixed is less important than making sure that you are taking on board how your editing needs to adjust so you don't end up blocked again. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:39, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- PS, maybe you're a speed reader :) But I kind of doubt that you really read through every link I listed in my post above in 20 minutes, and it is important when you have breached core policies on Wikipedia that you thoroughly read through the links provided in posts to you. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:44, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
February 2023
Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at
Your submission at Articles for creation: Androphobia (March 1)
Hello, 20 upper!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:12, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
|
<personal attack screed deleted>
- You just lost your talk page editing privileges for making personal attacks while blocked. You do not currently have an unblock request in place. You will have to file for one by emailing the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org with your username and appeal. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:29, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
WikiCup 2023 March newsletter
So ends the first round of the 2023 WikiCup. Everyone with a positive score moved on to Round 2, with 54 contestants qualifying. The top scorers in Round 1 were:
- Unlimitedlead with 1205 points, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with two featured articles on historical figures and several featured article candidate reviews.
- Epicgenius was in second place with 789 points; a seasoned WikiCup competitor he specialises in buildings and locations in New York.
- FrB.TG was in third place with 625 points, garnered from a featured article on a filmmaker which qualified for an impressive number of bonus points.
- TheJoebro64, another WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points gained from two featured articles on video games.
- Iazyges was in fifth place with 532 points, from two featured articles on classical history.
The top sixteen contestants at the end of Round 1 had all scored over 300 points; these included LunaEatsTuna, Thebiguglyalien, Sammi Brie, Trainsandotherthings, Lee Vilenski, Juxlos, Unexpectedlydian, SounderBruce, Kosack, BennyOnTheLoose and PCN02WPS. It was a high-scoring start to the competition.
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. The first round finished on February 26. Remember that any content promoted after that date but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
is declined. Confirmed block evasion as Dancing Dollar. User is now considered
) 16:54, 4 June 2023 (UTC)- Well I'll be. Ya think you know someone. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:07, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
- @WP:AN for consideration by the community. As this is a check user block, a check user must agree to unblock you. Best -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:52, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- @
Concern regarding Draft:Androphobia
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.
Your draft article, Draft:Androphobia
Hello, 20 upper. It has been over six months since you last edited the
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:37, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Email question
You asked via email if you count as a banned user. You do indeed; see
) 16:19, 25 October 2023 (UTC)TPA restored for
- @Yamla: -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:26, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
@
- Sorry for the wait. It is posted. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:16, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
@
- (carried over) -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:14, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
@
- Never mind, a user just voted. talk) 16:08, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Unbanned
Per the community consensus at AN, you have been unbanned under two conditions: you may only use one account, and this is a last-chance unblock; any further misconduct will result in an indefinite block. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 03:02, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Stop
Please stop. You were unblocked to make constructive edits on Wikipedia, not to play around on your user page. Almost all of your edits since having your ban lifted have been to your user space. --Yamla (talk) 14:26, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Okay, I just wanted to start by fixing my userpage in the final days of 2023, before I start creating articles and making useful contributions in the new year.
I'll stop editing for today, then tomorrow I'll do some copyedting on animal articles. I'm just waiting to start afresh in the new year, sorry for any inconveniences.talk) 14:55, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
The article
Your GA nomination of Megaherbivore
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
- I've made you a couple of trees, one of them surely incomplete. Would be grateful if you could mark each item on the GA1 page as done or otherwise actioned so I can see where you feel you've got to in the review. Many thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:59, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Megaherbivore
The article Megaherbivore you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Megaherbivore for comments about the article, and Talk:Megaherbivore/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:43, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
The article Sei whale you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sei whale for comments about the article, and Talk:Sei whale/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 00:01, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Cetacean FA
After tiger I plan on working another cetacean article, interested? Also, the old FA right whale is on my watchlist to work on and clean up. LittleJerry (talk) 23:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- @talk) 08:00, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I was planning on doing beluga whale. LittleJerry (talk) 14:25, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- So, I suppose I'll work with Narwhal for the time being, and after the Tiger FAC, we may collaborate with Beluga whale. talk) 14:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- I brought that article to GA but I didn't write most of it. I mostly rearranged some information, cleaned it up and added some text here and there. You should probably comb through the sources. LittleJerry (talk) 22:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed, talk) 19:34, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Looks good, though I personally think the beluga is more interesting. I don't expect tiger to be ready for PR or FAC until March. I'm taking it one step at a time. LittleJerry (talk) 21:03, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- talk) 20:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, I meant "good so far". I'm not the person to judge whether its ready. I don't do much content reviewing myself. All I'll say is that it is important to make sure all the sources support the text and paraphrasing is appropriate, see here. I would recommend getting a peer review first. LittleJerry (talk) 23:00, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I would certainly take it through peer review first as a first time FAC nomination, to catch anything. FAC isn't a walk in the park. FunkMonk (talk) 06:42, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Even though this will be my first nomination, I am familiar with the FAC procedure. You make FAC seem difficult when it's really not that onerous; I would have been nominating every other week if it weren't for the incredibly delayed process. I'm more than willing to fail and I have no fear of the FAC procedure. You know, character is forged by failure rather than success. I apologise for bothering you, talk) 13:17, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Feel free to bother me, I've nominated 60+ FACs, and while one may be familiar with the subjects, there's a whole lot of formalities and technicalities beside the content itself that need to be adhered to, and it is almost impossible for anyone to get it all right at first try. Very few, if any, take articles directly to FAC without going through GAN or PR first. So this is not to belittle your abilities, it is kind advice from experience. FunkMonk (talk) 14:19, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- You may also what to purchase this book. LittleJerry (talk) 05:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- For the next nine days, I won't be able to buy the book because I'm currently on safari in the African savannah and will be leaving camp soon. talk) 05:56, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, but is online on google books. Have a good trip! LittleJerry (talk) 18:15, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- For the next nine days, I won't be able to buy the book because I'm currently on safari in the African savannah and will be leaving camp soon.
- You may also what to purchase this book. LittleJerry (talk) 05:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Feel free to bother me, I've nominated 60+ FACs, and while one may be familiar with the subjects, there's a whole lot of formalities and technicalities beside the content itself that need to be adhered to, and it is almost impossible for anyone to get it all right at first try. Very few, if any, take articles directly to FAC without going through GAN or PR first. So this is not to belittle your abilities, it is kind advice from experience. FunkMonk (talk) 14:19, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Even though this will be my first nomination, I am familiar with the FAC procedure. You make FAC seem difficult when it's really not that onerous; I would have been nominating every other week if it weren't for the incredibly delayed process. I'm more than willing to fail and I have no fear of the FAC procedure. You know, character is forged by failure rather than success. I apologise for bothering you,
- Yeah, I would certainly take it through peer review first as a first time FAC nomination, to catch anything. FAC isn't a walk in the park. FunkMonk (talk) 06:42, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, I meant "good so far". I'm not the person to judge whether its ready. I don't do much content reviewing myself. All I'll say is that it is important to make sure all the sources support the text and paraphrasing is appropriate, see here. I would recommend getting a peer review first. LittleJerry (talk) 23:00, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Looks good, though I personally think the beluga is more interesting. I don't expect tiger to be ready for PR or FAC until March. I'm taking it one step at a time. LittleJerry (talk) 21:03, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed,
- I brought that article to GA but I didn't write most of it. I mostly rearranged some information, cleaned it up and added some text here and there. You should probably comb through the sources. LittleJerry (talk) 22:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- So, I suppose I'll work with Narwhal for the time being, and after the Tiger FAC, we may collaborate with Beluga whale.
- Thanks, I was planning on doing beluga whale. LittleJerry (talk) 14:25, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Dark mode
Hi, I can't find the function. The Jack (talk) 17:10, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- @talk) 17:25, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Indian rhinoceros
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
Your GA nomination of Indian rhinoceros
The article Indian rhinoceros you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Indian rhinoceros for comments about the article, and Talk:Indian rhinoceros/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:42, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Brown bear
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
Reverting my edits
I understand the need to revert over links. For example, we're not supposed to wiklink dates or city names in citations. However, hyperlinking to the journals and authors in citations seems obviously useful and the kind of thing Wikipedia and the web in general is so useful for compared to paper. Am I wrong in this and somehow violating a Wikpedia policy? As for over-emphasizing one author (Stirling), I was planning to continue with other edits linking to the other authors whom I could find existing articles for, but he was the most prominent, so I started with him. Given the rapid pace of edits for such a prominent article, I don't think it's practical to advise editors to wait until they have a mega-edit of linking to every possible author ready before publishing because that almost guarantees an edit conflict with someone else who's already put in an edit in the meantime. Instead, don't you think it makes more sense to go incrementally? Carney333 (talk) 21:15, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- @talk) 04:11, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Indian rhinoceros
On 29 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Indian rhinoceros, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an Indian rhinoceros, sent as a gift to Pope Leo X in 1515, was immortalised as Dürer's Rhinoceros after dying in a shipwreck? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Indian rhinoceros. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Indian rhinoceros), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Attention needed at username change request
Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 22:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. – DreamRimmer (talk) 05:54, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Message received. talk) 13:35, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- @talk) 19:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- @
- Message received.
FAC
Yo. Don't get discouraged. It took me a few times to get my first FAC passed. LittleJerry (talk) 19:58, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks man. It's hard. I'll give it another go later this year if the nom doesn't end up promoted. I now need to take a nighttime stroll to decompress. Oh! and I still have the Brown Bear GA to complete tomorrow. talk) 20:28, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hey your first FA nom went better than mine, which tanked alot more decisively. Look, it's doable. You get used to it and gets easier. But yeah decompress, have a break and see how you feel. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:54, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- talk) 14:31, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- In general, the narrower the topic/subject, the easier it is. So for narwhal, I too was worried about cultural material, which just isn't an issue in many organisms I've done. Some also "come together" alot easier than others and it's hard to put a finger on it. My writing also got better over time - have a look at User:Tony1/How to improve your writing as this really helped. Gotta run now, but will muse on things today. e.g. my thinking would be that Indian rhinoceros might be more achievable than brown bear...maybe at first glance??? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:18, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hey your first FA nom went better than mine, which tanked alot more decisively. Look, it's doable. You get used to it and gets easier. But yeah decompress, have a break and see how you feel. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:54, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- As I mentioned before, I strongly recommend taking this to WP:peer review before FAC. As I suspected, many of the issues that were brought up during the last FAC were related to various formalities that one mainly pics up after some nominations. FunkMonk (talk) 23:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- @talk) 14:47, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- @
- Best wishes, FAC certainly isn't that important. FunkMonk (talk) 15:14, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- @talk) 18:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- @
- Best wishes, FAC certainly isn't that important. FunkMonk (talk) 15:14, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Snowy albatross
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
GANReviewTool
Hello friend. My error logs indicate that the GANReviewTool script you were using failed to finish promotion, twice. Is it possible you are clicking away from the page before the script says "done" or "error"? If you're clicking away early, it could cause this kind of error. Or another possible cause is a bad internet connection. Could that possibly apply? I'm trying to get to the bottom of this bug since it happens a couple times a month to various people. Thanks a lot. Looking forward to your feedback. –Novem Linguae (talk) 04:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Novem Linguae: For some reason, my browser crashed and loaded a message stating
Error, something unexpected happened upon loading the preview. Please close and try again.
I don't think my wifi is the problem. Wolverine XI (den • 🐾) 13:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
DYK nomination of Brown bear
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
—Femke 🐦 (talk) 20:58, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Snowy albatross
The article Snowy albatross you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Snowy albatross for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AryKun -- AryKun (talk) 15:04, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Million Award for brown bear
The Million Award | |
For your contributions to bring Brown bear (estimated annual readership: 1,270,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 14:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC) |
- Wow! Thanks a lot. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 14:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Fishing cat
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
Your GA nomination of Fishing cat
The article Fishing cat you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Fishing cat for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 00:43, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Hey, Wolverine. I've been asked to look into your behaviour on the GANs for this article. Please take a step back for a little while - two editors have given some good advice on improving the article, and I'm sure they are both willing to give you feedback on your changes. However, comments like this are both unproductive and unfair to the reviewer. Please remember to remain civil and assume good faith on the part of others. Thanks, — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:16, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Fritzmann, I'd like to talk to you to make things okay. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 18:59, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Brown bear
On 29 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Brown bear, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in some rare cases, large Siberian tigers prey on adult brown bears? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Brown bear. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Brown bear), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Wolverine in Oregon!!
Hi!
Just thought you may want to add this to the wolverine article. Wolverine spotted multiple times in Eugene, Oregon. Wolverine’s are not thought to live in Oregon. https://www.koin.com/video/wolverine-spotted-in-eugene-suspected-to-be-same-one-seen-on-oregon-coast/9580910/
Best,
Doug 2601:1C2:4301:2320:352C:91B4:A7D6:B714 (talk) 01:27, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'll see what I can do. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 08:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
RfC
New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive
New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
|
|
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
note re ideas
hi. i like your ideas, for a possible "hall of fame." i left some comments at village pump Sm8900 (talk) 20:22, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- I see them. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 03:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Giant panda
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
Giraffe revert
Apologies, I think it must have been a template issue or something. At the time the infobox was broken in only your (latest) revision but not previous ones, someone else alerted me to it online and the issue was visible for me in multiple browsers and on multiple devices for only that revision which is why I reverted it. I dunno what happened there but whatever it is, it's fixed now (even your original revision I reverted shows up as it should). I thought maybe an odd encoding/parsing issue happened with the comma you added. Sorry for the confusion! Ennuified (talk) 03:25, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- It's OK. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 05:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
WikiProject Tree of Life Newsletter Issue 27
- March and April 2024—Issue 027
- Tree of Life
- Welcome to the Tree of Life newsletter!
News at a glance |
|
March DYKs |
|
April DYKs |
|
You are receiving this because you added your name to the subscribers list of the WikiProject Tree of Life. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)