Fatimid dynasty
Fatimid dynasty الفاطميون | |
---|---|
Parent family | Husaynids |
Country | Fatimid Caliphate |
Etymology | Fatima |
Founded | 909 |
Founder | Abd Allah al-Mahdi Billah |
Final ruler | Al-Adid li-Din Allah |
Historic seat | Raqqada (909–921) al-Mahdiya (921–948) al-Mansuriya (948–973) Cairo (973–1171) |
Titles | Imam and Caliph |
Dissolution | 1171 |
Historical Arab states and dynasties |
---|
The Fatimid dynasty (
The Fatimid dynasty emerged as the leaders of the clandestine early Isma'ili missionary movement (
The Fatimids' claimed pedigree of descent from Fatima and Ali was central to their legitimacy as the legitimate imams in an unbroken, divinely ordained line from Ali onwards. Their initial obscurity, and the publication of conflicting and incorrect genealogies by the first Fatimid caliph,
Fatimid expansion into the Levant, and the ideological challenge that the
Origin
Background: early Shi'ism
Since the death of
The sixth of these imams,
Fatimid genealogies and controversies
Official Fatimid doctrine claimed an uninterrupted line of succession between the first Fatimid caliph,
The main problem arises with the succession linking al-Mahdi with Ja'far al-Sadiq. According to Isma'ili doctrine, the imams that followed Muhammad ibn Isma'il were in concealment (satr), but early Isma'ili sources do not mention them, and even later, official Isma'ili genealogies diverge on the number, names and identities of these 'hidden imams' (al-a'imma al-masturin), a problem complicated by the Isma'ili claims that the hidden imams assumed various aliases for safety.[12][13] Thus the pro-Isma'ili Prince Peter Hagop Mamour, in his 1934 apologetic work Polemics on the Origin of the Fatimi Caliphs, lists no fewer than fifty variations of the line of the four hidden imams between Isma'il ibn Ja'far and al-Mahdi, claiming that the various names represent pseudonyms.[14] Early Isma'ili sources tend to be silent on the matter, from a mixture of both religious imperative—since God has decreed his imams to be hidden, they should remain so—and apparent ignorance.[15] Al-Mahdi himself, in a letter sent to the Isma'ili community in Yemen, even claimed not to be descended from Isma'il ibn Ja'far, but from his older brother Abdallah al-Aftah, who is generally held to not have had any descendants at all. Notably, later official Fatimid genealogies rejected this version.[16][17][18] In addition, it appears that the first known ancestor of the Fatimid line, Abdallah al-Akbar, the great-grandfather of the first Fatimid caliph, initially claimed descent not from Ali at all, but from his brother Aqil ibn Abi Talib, and was accepted as such by the Aqilids of Basra.[19] According to Brett, the line of descent claimed by the Fatimid between Ja'far al-Sadiq and al-Mahdi reflects "historical beliefs rather than historical figures, for which there is little or no independent confirmation",[11] as even Isma'il ibn Ja'far is an obscure figure, let alone his supposed hidden successors.[20]
While pro-Fatimid sources emphasize their
Early Isma'ili sources ignore the existence of Maymun al-Qaddah, but later, Fatimid-era sources were forced to confront their opponents' claims about his person, and tried to reconcile the conflicting genealogies accordingly.
Modern authors have tried to reconcile the genealogies. In Origins of Ismāʿı̄lism, the Arabist
The Fatimids and the early Isma'ili da'wa
Part of a series on Islam Isma'ilism |
---|
Islam portal |
Both the Twelvers and the Seveners held that their final imams were not dead, but had simply gone into concealment, and that they would soon return as a messiah, the mahdi ('the Rightly Guided One') or qa'im ('He Who Arises'), to usher in the end times.[1][33] The mahdi would rapidly overthrow the usurping Abbasids and destroy their capital Baghdad, restore the unity of the Muslims, conquer Constantinople, ensure the final triumph of Islam and establish a reign of peace and justice.[34] The Isma'ilis in particular believed that the mahdi would reveal the true, 'inner' (batin) meaning of religion, which was until then reserved for a few select initiates. The mahdi would abolish the 'outer' (zahir) forms and strictures of Islam, since henceforth the true religion, the religion of Adam, would be manifested without the need for symbols and other mediating devices.[35]
While the mahdi Muhammad ibn Isma'il remained hidden, however, he would need to be represented by agents, who would gather the faithful, spread the word (
During the late ninth century,
Qarmatian schism and flight to the Maghreb
In about 899, Abdallah ibn al-Husayn assumed the leadership of the da'wa. Soon, he began making alterations to the doctrine, which worried Hamdan Qarmat. Abdan went to Salamiyah to investigate the matter, and learned that Abdallah claimed that the expected mahdi was not Muhammad ibn Isma'il, as commonly propagated, but Abdallah himself, and that Abdallah's ancestors, far from being simply the hujjas of the imams, were actually the imams themselves. In a letter to the Yemeni community, Abdallah claimed that 'Muhammad ibn Isma'il' was actually a cover name assumed by each incumbent imam, and denied any particular role of Muhammad ibn Isma'il as the expected mahdi who was to usher in the end times.[48] These doctrinal innovations caused a major rift in the movement, as Hamdan denounced the leadership in Salamiyah, gathered the Iraqi da'is and ordered them to cease the missionary effort. Shortly after this Hamdan "disappeared" from his headquarters, and Abdan was assassinated by Zakarawayh ibn Mihrawayh, who had remained loyal to Salamiyah.[49]
The schism left the early Isma'ili da'wa divided into two factions: those who accepted Abdallah's claims, and continued to follow him, and became the Isma'ilis proper, and those who rejected them and continued to believe in the return of Muhammad ibn Isma'il as mahdi, who became known as the
Ruling an empire
Establishment of the Fatimid Caliphate
In the meantime, in Ifriqiya, the da'i Abu Abdallah al-Shi'i had managed to convert the
The first crisis of the new regime occurred quickly. Abu Abdallah al-Shi'i and his brother demanded proof of Abdallah being the mahdi, or resented the limitations on their authority placed by the new ruler. Al-Mahdi Billah was able to eliminate them in 911, but this led to a Kutama revolt, led by a child mahdi as a figurehead. The uprising was defeated, and the Fatimid control over the Kutama consolidated.
Imperial expansion
Given the semi-divine status they claimed as the rightful imams of Islam, the Fatimids' ambitions were not limited to Ifriqiya. The Fatimid caliphs aimed to overthrow not only the rival Muslim monarchs—the Abbasids of Baghdad and the
Fatimid power quickly expanded across the sea to
The Fatimids also expanded west to the rest of the Maghreb, where Fez and Sijilmasa were captured in 920–921, although these conquests were difficult to hold, and brought the Fatimids into conflict with the Umayyads of Cordoba.[63][64] In an attempt to supplant the Abbasids, al-Mahdi's son and heir, al-Qa'im bi-Amr Allah, led campaigns eastward to capture Egypt in 914 and 919. Both endeavours failed, leaving only the Cyrenaica in Fatimid hands.[10][64]
Revolt of Abu Yazid
Between 916 and 921, al-Mahdi built a new residence, the fortified palace city of Mahdiyya, on a rocky promontory on the Ifriqiyan coast.[10] When Al-Mahdi died in 934, he was succeeded by his son, al-Qa'im (r. 934–946), who continued his father's policies.[65] Another attempted invasion of Egypt in 935 was defeated by the country's new strongman ruler, Muhammad ibn Tughj al-Ikhshid.[66]
The most notable event of al-Qa'im's reign was the revolt of the Zenata Berbers under the Khariji preacher
Conquest of Egypt and move of the capital to Cairo
Al-Mu'izz was an excellent planner and organizer, and the state he inherited had regained internal stability, after the turmoils of Abu Yazid's revolt.[70] His early reign saw successes against the Byzantines, where the last remaining Byzantine strongholds were extinguished with the Fall of Rometta in 965,[71] as well as the reconquest of the western Maghreb by the Fatimid general Jawhar in 958–960, temporarily expelling Umayyad influence from the region and extending Fatimid rule to the shores of the Atlantic Ocean.[72]
After these successes, al-Mu'izz once again turned to the abandoned project of the conquest of Egypt. Meticulous military and political preparations were undertaken, and the agents of the Isma'ili da'wa engaged to promote the Fatimid cause in Egypt and suborn officials of the weakened
Jawhar governed Egypt for the next four years as viceroy of al-Mu'izz, restoring the country's finances.[75] It was not until August 972 that al-Mu'izz left Ifriqiya, appointing the Berber Buluggin ibn Ziri as his viceroy there. In June 973, the Fatimid court arrived in Egypt and al-Mu'izz took up residence in Cairo.[76]
Expansion into Syria
In the meantime, immediately after the conquest if Egypt Jawhar had tried to extend Fatimid rule into Syria. The first Fatimid invasion failed largely due to the opposition of the Qarmatians of Bahrayn, who did not hesitate to align themselves with the Abbasid caliph and denounce al-Mu'izz in public. The Qarmatian leader al-Hasan al-A'sam led two invasions of Egypt in 971 and again, despite al-Mu'izz's efforts to win him over, in 974. Both invasions were beaten back at the gates of Cairo, forcing the Qarmatians to retreat to Bahrayn, and opening the path for a renewed Fatimid attempt to conquer Syria.[77] At the same time, around 970/71, the two holy cities of Mecca and Medina, recognized Fatimid suzerainty, an important symbolic victory for the Fatimids.[78]
In 978, Caliph
Reign of al-Hakim
Al-Aziz died in 996, while preparing a major campaign against the Byzantines and Hamdanids. He was succeeded by his eleven-year-old son,
From 1015 on, the Fatimid Caliphate, and the Isma'ili community, were confronted by a rise in sectarianism: a series of preachers who propagated extremist versions of Isma'ilism appeared, preaching the imminence of the end times, the divinity of al-Hakim, and the abolition of the
The dynasty in power
Members of the dynasty were carefully kept out of public affairs; even princes and princesses of the blood did not have a special position at court, let alone being entrusted with the governance of provinces or the command of armies as in other medieval states, which might result in an independent power base that could threaten the orderly father-to-son succession of the imamate and caliphate.
Nevertheless, the members of the dynasty enjoyed immense riches, founded on the possession of properties in the capital, Cairo, and its environs, as well as commerce.
Family trees
Descent from Ali as accepted by the later Isma'ilis
|
Genealogy according to al-Mahdi's letter to the Yemeni community
Descent according to a letter sent to the Isma'ili community in Yemen by al-Mahdi bi'llah, which was reproduced by Ja'far ibn Mansur al-Yaman[86][87] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
denotes imams, regnal names in bold
|
Genealogy as proposed by Bernard Lewis
Mustawda'/Qaddahite (left) and Mustakarr/Alid (right) imams, as proposed by Bernard Lewis[88] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Dynastic family tree
References
- ^ a b c d e Brett 2017, p. 18.
- ^ Brett 2001, p. 31.
- ^ Daftary 2007, pp. 88–89.
- ^ Daftary 2007, p. 89.
- ^ Halm 1991, pp. 27–28.
- ^ Daftary 2007, pp. 89–90.
- ^ Daftary 2007, pp. 90–96.
- ^ a b Canard 1965, p. 850.
- ^ cf. Andani 2016, pp. 199–200 for a summary.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t Halm 2014.
- ^ a b Brett 2001, p. 29.
- ^ Canard 1965, pp. 850–851.
- ^ Daftary 2007, pp. 99–100, 104.
- ^ Brett 2001, p. 34.
- ^ Brett 2001, p. 35.
- ^ a b c d Canard 1965, p. 851.
- ^ Daftary 2007, p. 101.
- ^ Halm 1991, pp. 146–147.
- ^ Halm 1991, pp. 19–20.
- ^ Brett 2001, p. 30.
- ^ a b c d Canard 1965, p. 852.
- ^ Daftary 2007, pp. 8, 101–103.
- ^ Andani 2016, pp. 199–200.
- ^ Daftary 2007, pp. 8–9, 24–25.
- ^ Daftary 2007, pp. 101–103.
- ^ a b c Daftary 2007, p. 105.
- ^ Daftary 2007, pp. 105–106.
- ^ a b Daftary 2007, p. 107.
- ^ Daftary 2007, p. 103.
- ^ Daftary 2007, pp. 104–105.
- ^ Brett 2001, p. 36.
- ^ Andani 2016, p. 200.
- ^ Halm 1991, p. 28.
- ^ Halm 1991, pp. 28–29.
- ^ Halm 1991, p. 29.
- ^ Halm 1991, pp. 29–30.
- ^ Halm 1991, pp. 16–18.
- ^ Halm 1991, pp. 17–20.
- ^ Halm 1991, pp. 22–24.
- ^ Daftary 2007, pp. 99–100.
- ^ a b Daftary 2007, p. 100.
- ^ Brett 2017, p. 17.
- ^ Daftary 2007, p. 108.
- ^ Halm 1991, p. 47.
- ^ Daftary 2007, pp. 108–110.
- ^ Daftary 2007, p. 116.
- ^ Halm 1991, p. 61.
- ^ Daftary 2007, pp. 116–119.
- ^ Daftary 2007, p. 117.
- ^ a b Daftary 2007, p. 120.
- ^ Daftary 2007, pp. 122–124.
- ^ Daftary 2007, pp. 123, 125.
- ^ Daftary 2007, pp. 126–127.
- ^ Daftary 2007, p. 127.
- ^ Daftary 2007, pp. 127–128.
- ^ Daftary 2007, p. 128.
- ^ Daftary 2007, p. 141.
- ^ Daftary 2007, pp. 141–142.
- ^ Canard 1942–1947.
- ^ a b c d Canard 1965, p. 853.
- ^ Daftary 2007, pp. 143–144.
- ^ Lev 1995, pp. 191–192.
- ^ Canard 1965, pp. 852–853.
- ^ a b Daftary 2007, p. 142.
- ^ Daftary 2007, p. 145.
- ^ Daftary 2007, p. 143.
- ^ Daftary 2007, p. 146.
- ^ Daftary 2007, pp. 146–147.
- ^ Daftary 2007, p. 147.
- ^ Daftary 2007, p. 156.
- ^ Daftary 2007, pp. 144–145.
- ^ Daftary 2007, pp. 156–157.
- ^ Daftary 2007, p. 158.
- ^ Daftary 2007, p. 159.
- ^ Daftary 2007, p. 161.
- ^ Daftary 2007, p. 162.
- ^ Daftary 2007, p. 162–164.
- ^ a b c d e f Canard 1965, p. 854.
- ^ a b c Canard 1965, p. 855.
- ^ Canard 1965, pp. 855–856.
- ^ a b Halm 2014, p. 149.
- ^ Halm 2014, pp. 149–150.
- ^ Lev 1991, pp. 65–67.
- ^ Lev 1991, p. 65.
- ^ Lev 1991, pp. 68–69.
- ^ Daftary 2007, pp. 101, 118–119.
- ^ Halm 1991, pp. 145–147.
- ^ Lewis 1940, pp. 71–73.
Sources
- Andani, Khalil (2016). "A Survey of Ismaili Studies (Part 1): Early Ismailism and Fatimid Ismailism". Religion Compass. 10 (8): 191–206. .
- Brett, Michael (2001). The Rise of the Fatimids: The World of the Mediterranean and the Middle East in the Fourth Century of the Hijra, Tenth Century CE. The Medieval Mediterranean. Vol. 30. Leiden: BRILL. ISBN 9004117415.
- Brett, Michael (2017). The Fatimid Empire. The Edinburgh History of the Islamic Empires. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 978-0-7486-4076-8.
- Canard, Marius (1942–1947). "L'impérialisme des Fatimides et leur propagande". Annales de l'Institut d'Études Orientales (in French). VI: 156–193.
- OCLC 495469475.
- ISBN 978-0-521-61636-2.
- Cortese, Delia; Calderini, Simonetta (2006). Women and the Fatimids in the World of Islam. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 0-7486-1733-7.
- ISBN 978-3-406-35497-7.
- Halm, Heinz (2014). "Fāṭimids". In Fleet, Kate; ISSN 1873-9830.
- ISBN 978-90-04-30590-8.
- Lev, Yaacov (1991). State and Society in Fatimid Egypt. Leiden: E. J. Brill. ISBN 90-04-09344-3.
- Lev, Yaacov (1995). "The Fatimids and Byzantium, 10th–12th Centuries". Graeco-Arabica. 6: 190–208. OCLC 183390203.
- Lewis, Bernard (1940). Origins of Ismāʿı̄lism: A Study of the Historical Background of the Fāṭimid Caliphate. Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons.
- Schrier, Omert J. (2006). "The Prehistory of the Fatimid Dynasty: Some Chronological and Genealogical Remarks". Die Welt des Orients. 36: 143–191. JSTOR 25684056.