Cattle feeding
Agriculture |
---|
Agriculture portal |
This article's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. (August 2021) |
There are different systems of feeding cattle in
Types of feeding
Grazing
Grazing by cattle is practiced in
Integrated livestock-crop farming
In this system, cattle are primarily fed on pastures,
Feedlot and intensive finishing
Feedlot and intensive finishing are
Types of cattle feeds
Grass-fed
Grass and other forage compose most or the majority of a grass-fed diet. There is debate whether cattle should be raised on diets primarily composed of pasture (grass) or on a concentrated diet of grain,
Corn-fed
Cattle called corn-fed, grain-fed or corn-finished are typically raised on maize, soy and other types of feed. Some corn-fed cattle are raised in concentrated animal feeding operations known as feed lots.
In the United States, dairy cattle are often supplemented with grain to increase the efficiency of production and reduce the area needed to support the energy requirements of the herd.
A high-energy diet increases milk output, measured in pounds or kilograms of milk per head per day.[9]
Barley-fed
In Western Canada beef cattle are usually finished on a barley-based diet.[10]
Flax
In some parts of the world
Other supplements
There are many alternative feeds and
Medicinal and synthetic products
Cattle feed may also include various substances such as
Antibiotics
Antibiotics are used in the cattle industry for therapeutic purposes in the clinical treatment of infections and
A critical journalist has claimed that the lower population density in free-range animals need decreased antibiotics usage, and has conjectured that cattle would not get sick if they were not fed a corn-based diet.[9] However, bovine respiratory disease, the most common reason for antibiotic therapy, has risk factors common in both forms of production (feedlot and pasture finished).[19]
Safety
Due to concerns about antibiotics residues getting into the milk or meat of cattle, there are regulatory agencies and measures in place in order to ensure that foods produced do not contain antibiotics at a level which will cause harm to consumers in the United States and Canada.[17][20]
Growth stimulants
The use of supplemental growth hormones is controversial. The benefits of using growth hormones includes improved feed efficiency, carcass quality and rate of muscle development. The cattle industry takes the position that the use of growth hormones allows plentiful meats to be sold for affordable prices.[21] Using hormones in beef cattle costs $1.50 and adds between 40 and 50 lb (18 and 23 kg) to the weight of a steer at slaughter, for a return of at least $25.[22]
Safety
There exists customer concern about growth hormone use being linked to a number of human health problems, such as
There are three natural hormones (estradiol, progesterone, and testosterone), naturally present in cattle and humans, their synthetic alternatives (zeranol, melengestrol acetate, and trenbolone acetate) have been approved by the VDD for use in Canadian beef production.[25] Studies show that the contribution of hormones from beef consumption is minuscule compared to the quantities produced naturally in the human body.[17][25] For comparison, an adult male will produce 136,000 ng of estrogen on a given day; whereas the estrogen levels present in a 6-ounce serving of beef from a treated animal is only approximately 3.8 ng. In other words, a human being will produce almost 36,000 times the amount of estrogen in one day that would be present in a piece of beef produced with the growth hormones.[25] Thus, current scientific evidence is insufficient to support the hypothesis that any diseases are caused by ingested hormones due to hormonal substance use in animals.[17][21][25] However, the differences between levels in treated and non-treated animals were deemed significant enough for the EU to ban imports of U.S. beef.[citation needed]
Drought fodder for extensive rangeland agriculture
Increasing intensities and frequencies of drought events put rangeland agriculture under pressure in semi-arid and arid geographic areas. Innovative emergency fodder production concepts have been reported, such as bush-based animal fodder production in Namibia. During extended dry spells, farmers have turned to use woody biomass fiber from encroacher bush as a primary source of cattle feed, adding locally available supplements for nutrients as well as to improve palatability.[26][27][28][29]
Effects of feed on health
Flax seeds suppress inflammatory effects from bovine respiratory disease (BRD) often affecting stressed cattle during transport and processing. BRD can lead to lung tissue damage and impair the performance of the cattle leading to a low final body mass at slaughter, or premature death.[11]
Effects of feed on product
Marbling and fats
Most grass-fed beef is leaner than feedlot beef, lacking
A study showed that tissue lipids of North American and African ruminants were similar to pasture-fed cattle, but dissimilar to grain-fed cattle. The lipid composition of wild ruminant tissues may serve as a model for dietary lipid recommendations in treating and preventing chronic disease.[31]
Dairy
In 2021, food management system expert Sylvain Charlebois remarked on the industry's use of palm oil, given as palmitic acid supplements, to augment the output of milk product: they "are marketed as a way to increase milk output and boost fat content" but a "review by the Dairy Research and Extension Consortium of Alberta found that butter made from cows fed palm oil remains difficult to spread at room temperature."[32] Consumers were dismayed because the physical characteristics of the dairy products had undergone a significant change, notably in increased hardness and increased melting point of the palm oil supplemented butter, although an item published in The Globe and Mail attempted to blame the consumer for the actions of the producer.[33] Charlebois noted that this was not beneficial to the consumer, who was surprised and had not been notified of the social contract variation to his disadvantage.[32]
Taste
The cow's diet affects the flavor of the resultant meat and milk. A 2003 Colorado State University study found that 80% of consumers in the Denver-Colorado area preferred the taste of United States corn-fed beef to Australian grass-fed beef, and negligible difference in taste preference compared to Canadian barley-fed beef, though the cattle's food was not the only difference in the beef tested,[34] nor is Denver a representative sample of the world beef market, so the results are inconclusive.
Remarkably, in some circumstances, cattle are fed wine or beer. It is believed that this improves the taste of the beef. This technique has been used both in Japan and France.[35]
Nutrition
Animal products for human consumption from animals raised on pasture have shown nutritional differences from those of animals raised on other feedstuffs.[36][37][38][39]
Health
E. coli
Bovine spongiform encephalopathy
Meat and bone meal can be a risk factor for bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), when healthy animals consume tainted tissues from infected animals. People concerned about Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD), which is also a spongiform encephalopathy, may favor grass-fed cattle for this reason. In the United States, this risk is relatively low as feeding of protein sources from any ruminant to another ruminant has been banned since 1997.[44] The problem becomes more complicated as other feedstuffs containing animal by-products are still allowed to be fed to other non-ruminants (chickens, cats, dogs, horses, pigs, etc.). Therefore, at a feed mill mixing feed for pigs, for instance, there is still the possibility of cross-contamination of feed going to cattle.[45] Since only a tiny amount of the contaminating prion begins the cascading brain disease, any amount of mixed feed could cause many animals to become infected.[citation needed] This was the only traceable link among the cattle with BSE in Canada that led to the recent US embargo of Canadian beef.[citation needed] No cases of BSE have been reported so far in Australia. This is largely due to Australia's strict quarantine and biosecurity rules that prohibit beef imports from countries known to be infected with BSE.
However, according to a report filed in The Australian on February 25, 2010, those rules were suddenly relaxed and the process to submit beef products from known BSE-infected countries was allowed (pending an application process).[46] But less than a week later, Tony Burke, the Australian Minister For Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry swiftly overturned the decision and placed a 'two year stop' on all fresh and chilled beef products destined for Australia from BSE known countries of origin, thereby relaxing fears held by Australians that contaminated US beef would find its way onto Australian supermarket shelves after a long absence.[47][48]
Soybean meal is cheap and plentiful in the United States. As a result, the use of animal byproduct feeds was never common, as it was in Europe. However, U.S. regulations only partially prohibit the use of animal byproducts in feed. In 1997, regulations prohibited the feeding of mammalian byproducts to ruminants such as cattle and goats. However, the byproducts of ruminants can still be legally fed to pets or other livestock such as pigs and poultry such as chickens. In addition, it is legal for ruminants to be fed byproducts from some of these animals.[49]
Campylobacter
Campylobacter, a bacterium that can cause another foodborne illness resulting in nausea, vomiting, fever, abdominal pain, headache and muscle pain, was found by Australian researchers to be carried by 58% of cattle raised in feedlots versus only 2% of pasture raised and finished cattle.[50]
Environmental concerns
For environmental reasons, a study by Burney et al. advocates
Country-specific
The examples and perspective in this section may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. (August 2021) |
Beef production tends to be concentrated, with the top six producers—the U.S., the European Union, Brazil, Australia, Argentina, and Russia—accounting for about 60% of global production. Significant shifts among producers have occurred over time. Cattle production worldwide is differentiated by animal genetics and feeding methods, resulting in differing quality types. Cattle are basically residual claimants to crop or land resources. Those countries with excess or low-value land tend to grass-feed their cattle herds, while those countries with excess feed grains, such as the U.S. and Canada, finish cattle with a grain ration. Grain-fed cattle have more internal fat (i.e., marbling) which results in a more tender meat than forage-fed cattle of a similar age. In some Asian countries such as Japan, which is not a grain-surplus country, tastes and preferences have encouraged feeding grain to cattle, but at a high cost since the grain must be imported.[55]
Canada
The majority of beef cattle in
Regulations on
The Animal Nutrition Association of Canada has developed a comprehensive
A complete HACCP system is mandatory for all federally inspected establishments. These systems include prerequisite programs, which are general procedures or good manufacturing practices that enhance food safety for all meat production processes. HACCP plans build on this foundation and are designed to control potential hazards for specific production processes.[56]
Alberta beef
Alberta has become the center of the western Canadian beef industry and has 70% of the feedlot capacity and 70% of the beef processing capacity in Canada.[57]
The Canadian province of
The Alberta beef label found on some beef is not an
United States
According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) there are 25–33 million feed cattle moving through custom and commercial cattle feed yards annually. The monthly USDA "Cattle on Feed Report" is available for public viewing.[63]
Labelling
The USDA's Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) released a revised proposal for a grass-fed meat label for its process-verified labelling program in May 2006.[64] This established a standard definition for the "grass-fed" claim which required continuous access to pasture and animals not being fed grain or grain-based products.[65] The Union of Concerned Scientists, which in general supported the labelling proposal, claimed that the label, which contained the clause "consumption of grain in the immature stage is acceptable", allowed for "feed harvesting or stockpiling methods that might include significant amounts of grain" because the term "immature" was not clearly defined.[66] The label was revoked by the USDA on January 12, 2016, claiming it had no jurisdiction over what should be FDA regulations.[67]
Until 2015, the US had
See also
References
- ^ de Haan, Cees; Steinfeld, Henning; Blackburn, Harvey. "Chapter 2: Livestock grazing systems & the environment". Livestock & the Environment: Finding a Balance. Food and Agriculture Organization.
- ^ de Haan, Cees; Steinfeld, Henning; Blackburn, Harvey. "Chapter 3: Mixed farming systems & the environment". Livestock & the Environment: Finding a Balance. Food and Agriculture Organization.
- PMID 25384155. Retrieved October 4, 2019.
- ^ "Lotfeeding and intensive finishing". Meat & Livestock Australia. 2019. Retrieved October 4, 2019.
- ^ Cross, Kim (March 29, 2011). "The grass-fed vs. grain-fed beef debate". cnn.com. Cooking Light. Retrieved June 15, 2015.
- ^ a b Brissette, Christy (December 19, 2018). "Perspective | Your 'grass-fed' beef may not have come from a cow grazing in a pasture. Here's why". Washington Post. Retrieved February 14, 2019.
- ^ a b Sosnowski, Pamela. "Grass-Fed Cattle Feeding". Verde Farms. Retrieved March 6, 2016.
- ^ "Not All Grass Fed Beef Is Legit. Here's What To Look Out For". HuffPost Canada. July 24, 2019. Retrieved November 20, 2019.
- ^ a b c Pollan, Michael (March 31, 2002). "This Steer's Life". The New York Times Magazine: 44–.
- ^ a b c "Corn or Barley for feeding Steers". Virtual Beef Newsletter. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food. August 20, 2004. Retrieved November 8, 2009.
- ^ a b c Maddock, Travis D.; Anderson, Vernon L.; Lardy, Greg P. "Using Flax in Livestock Diets". North Dakota State University. pp. 53–62. Archived from the original on February 22, 2012.
- PMID 16699112.
- ^ a b Lardy, Greg P.; Anderson, Vern L.; Dahlen, Carl (October 2015). Alternative feeds for ruminants (PDF) (Report). North Dakota State University Extension Service. p. 1–28. AS1182 (Revised). Retrieved October 4, 2019.
- PMID 18348709.
- ^ Mellon, M. (2001). "Hogging It!: Estimates of Antimicrobial Abuse in Livestock" (PDF) (1st ed.). Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 3, 2012. Retrieved December 25, 2013.
- ISSN 0362-4331.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Canadian Cattlemen's Association and Beef Information Centre (2003). "Understanding Use of Antibiotic and Hormonal Substances in Beef Cattle". Nutrition Perspective. Archived from the original on May 17, 2016. Retrieved October 29, 2009.
- ^ Prince, Stephen D. (April 11, 2003). Ionophores (PDF) (Student Research Summary). Texas A&M University. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 26, 2013. Retrieved December 25, 2013.
- PMID 15086084. Archived from the original(PDF) on September 27, 2006.
- ^ USDA. "Beef...from Farm to Table". Fact Sheets. Archived from the original on February 24, 2013.
- ^ a b c "Consumer Concerns About Hormones in Food". Archived from the original on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 20, 2011.
- ^ a b Pollan, Michael (March 31, 2002). "Power Steer". The New York Times. p. 7.
- ISBN 9781610692335.
- ^ ISBN 9781412996808.
- ^ a b c d e f Canadian Animal Health Institute (2003). "Hormones: A Safe, Effective Production Tool for the Canadian Beef Industry" (PDF). Retrieved October 30, 2009.
- ^ Ministry of Agriculture, Water and Forestry (2018). Report on the Bush-to-Feed Pilot Projet in the African Wild Dog Community Forest. http://www.forestry.gov.na/documents/32982/937523/NAFOLA+Report+on+bush/8be204be-eb4f-4156-bac7-610ae9c35315?version=1.0
- ^ "Manual on how to produce animal feed from local encroached bush launched". Namibia Economist. November 30, 2018. Retrieved June 22, 2020.
- ^ "Turning bush to feed in face of drought". The Namibian. October 18, 2016. Retrieved June 22, 2020.
- ISBN 978-981-99-2427-1, retrieved October 13, 2023
- ^ Union of Concerned Scientists. "Greener Pastures: How grass-fed beef and milk contribute to healthy eating" (PDF): 58. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 14, 2006.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - PMID 11960292.
- ^ a b CHARLEBOIS, SYLVAIN (February 21, 2021). "The dairy industry's use of palm oil breaches its moral contract with Canadians". The Globe and Mail Inc.
- ^ VAN ROSENDAAL, JULIE (February 20, 2021). "Is your butter not as soft as it used to be? The pandemic and our urge to bake is partly to blame – along with palm oil". The Globe and Mail Inc.
- ^ Umberger, Wendy; Thilmany, Dawn; Ziehl, Amanda Ziehl (2003). "Consumer Tastes & Preferences: What Research Indicates". Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, Colorado State University. Archived from the original on September 7, 2006.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - ^ "Why Is France Feeding Wine to Their Cows?". Discovery News. July 16, 2012. Retrieved July 16, 2012.
- PMID 8376232. Archived from the original(PDF) on 8 December 2015. Retrieved 27 April 2013.
- PMID 18641180. Retrieved April 27, 2013.
- PMID 23048149. Retrieved April 27, 2013.
- PMID 15636165.
- ^ Russell, James B. (2002). Rumen Microbiology and Its Role in Ruminant Nutrition. Ithaca, New York: Dept. of Microbiology, Cornell University.
- ISBN 9781101147177.
- PMID 10717540.
- ^ Scott, Tony; Wilson, Casey; Bailey, Doreen; Klopfenstein, Terry; Milton, Todd; Moxley, Rod; Smith, Dave; Gray, Jeff; Hungerford. "Influence of Diet on Total and Acid Resistant E. coli and Colonic pH" (PDF). 2000 Nebraska Beef Report: 39–41. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 13, 2006.
- ^ "2004.01.26: Expanded "Mad Cow" Safeguards Announced To Strengthen Existing Firewalls Against BSE Transmission". US Department of Health and Human Services. January 26, 2004. Archived from the original on July 14, 2008. Retrieved November 8, 2009.
- PMID 17520050.
- ^ Cresswell, Adam (February 25, 2010). "Mad scramble over beef imports". The Australian.
- ^ Jamie (March 11, 2010). "Agriculture minister overturns beef import decision". Slow Food in Australia. Archived from the original on March 28, 2011.[self-published source]
- Toowoomba Chronicle.
- ]
- ^
Bailey, Graham D; Vanselow, Barbara A; Hornitzky, Michael A; Hum, Steven I; Eamens, Graeme J; Gill, Paul A; Walker, Keith H; Cronin, John P (2003). "A study of the foodborne pathogens: Campylobacter, Listeria and Yersinia, in faeces from slaughter-age cattle and sheep in Australia". Communicable Diseases Intelligence Quarterly Report. 27 (2): 249–257. PMID 12926738.
- PMID 20551223.
- ^ Hoorman, James; McCutcheon, Jeff. "Negative Effects of Livestock Grazing Riparian Areas". ohioline.osu.edu. Ohio State University School of Environment and Natural Resources. Archived from the original on June 17, 2015. Retrieved June 15, 2015.
- ^ Kauffman, J. Boone. "Lifeblood of the West". Archived from the original on August 22, 2007. Retrieved August 8, 2007.
- Sierra.
- ^ Schnepf, Randy; Economic Research Service/USDA (December 1997). "World Beef & Cattle Trade: Evolving & Expanding" (PDF). Agricultural Outlook. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 13, 2010. Retrieved December 4, 2009.
- ^ "Canada Beef Inc". Archived from the original on December 26, 2013. Retrieved November 30, 2009.
- ^ a b What is Alberta Beef, Alberta Beef Producers, archived from the original on May 3, 2016, retrieved May 1, 2016
- ^ Alberta - Province, Climate, Geography, Government of Alberta, archived from the original on May 3, 2016, retrieved May 1, 2016
- ^ Total farm area, land tenure and land in crops, by province, Statistics Canada, 2006, retrieved May 1, 2016
- ^ Cattle inventories, by province (Alberta), Statistics Canada, March 3, 2016, retrieved May 1, 2016
- ^ Beef herd numbers continue to fall in Canada, The Western Producer, May 14, 2014, retrieved May 1, 2016
- ^ The Potential for Grain Corn in Alberta, Alberta Department of Agriculture and Forestry, August 26, 2014, retrieved May 1, 2016
- ^ Cattle on Feed Report by USDA
- ^ Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA (May 12, 2006). "United States Standard for Livestock and Meat Marketing Claim, Grass (Forage) Fed Claim". The Federal Register. Retrieved August 2, 2006.
- ^ "Agricultural Marketing Service". News room. USDA. October 31, 2008. Archived from the original on December 22, 2007. Retrieved November 8, 2009.
- ^ Clancy, Kate. "What's At Stake?". Union of Concerned Scientists. Archived from the original on September 29, 2007. Retrieved August 2, 2006.
- ^ "USDA Revokes Grass Fed Label Standard". News room. USDA. January 12, 2016. Retrieved January 12, 2016.
- ^ WTO Disputes, Canadian Cattlemen's Association, May 18, 2015, retrieved May 1, 2016