Epidural administration: Difference between revisions

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Content deleted Content added
Extended confirmed users
5,387 edits
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v1.6.1) (Balon Greyjoy)
Line 163: Line 163:
* High block, as described above (uncommon, less than 1 in 500).
* High block, as described above (uncommon, less than 1 in 500).
* Catheter misplaced into the subarachnoid space (rare, less than 1 in 1000). If the catheter is accidentally misplaced into the subarachnoid space (e.g. after an unrecognised accidental dural puncture), normally cerebrospinal fluid can be freely aspirated from the catheter (which would usually prompt the anaesthetist to withdraw the catheter and resite it elsewhere). If, however, this is not recognised, large doses of anaesthetic may be delivered directly into the cerebrospinal fluid. This may result in a high block, or, more rarely, a ''total spinal'', where anaesthetic is delivered directly to the brainstem, causing unconsciousness and sometimes [[seizures]].
* Catheter misplaced into the subarachnoid space (rare, less than 1 in 1000). If the catheter is accidentally misplaced into the subarachnoid space (e.g. after an unrecognised accidental dural puncture), normally cerebrospinal fluid can be freely aspirated from the catheter (which would usually prompt the anaesthetist to withdraw the catheter and resite it elsewhere). If, however, this is not recognised, large doses of anaesthetic may be delivered directly into the cerebrospinal fluid. This may result in a high block, or, more rarely, a ''total spinal'', where anaesthetic is delivered directly to the brainstem, causing unconsciousness and sometimes [[seizures]].
* Neurological injury lasting less than 1 year (rare, about 1 in 6,700).<ref name=ox>{{cite web|url=http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/band159/b159-3.html|title=Epidurals and risk: it all depends [May 2007; 159–3]}}</ref>
* Neurological injury lasting less than 1 year (rare, about 1 in 6,700).<ref name=ox>{{cite web|url=http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/band159/b159-3.html|title=Epidurals and risk: it all depends [May 2007; 159–3]|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://archive.is/20121223031725/http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/band159/b159-3.html|archivedate=December 23, 2012|df=mdy-all}}</ref>
* [[Epidural abscess]] formation (very rare, about 1 in 145,000).<ref name=ox/> Infection risk increases with the duration catheters are left in place, although infection was still uncommon after an average of 3 to 5 days' duration.<ref name=Scott1995>{{cite journal |vauthors=Scott DA, Beilby DS, McClymont C | title = Postoperative analgesia using epidural infusions of fentanyl with bupivacaine. A prospective analysis of 1,014 patients | journal = Anesthesiology | volume = 83 | issue = 4 | pages = 727–37 | year = 1995 | pmid = 7574052 | doi = 10.1097/00000542-199510000-00012 }}</ref>
* [[Epidural abscess]] formation (very rare, about 1 in 145,000).<ref name=ox/> Infection risk increases with the duration catheters are left in place, although infection was still uncommon after an average of 3 to 5 days' duration.<ref name=Scott1995>{{cite journal |vauthors=Scott DA, Beilby DS, McClymont C | title = Postoperative analgesia using epidural infusions of fentanyl with bupivacaine. A prospective analysis of 1,014 patients | journal = Anesthesiology | volume = 83 | issue = 4 | pages = 727–37 | year = 1995 | pmid = 7574052 | doi = 10.1097/00000542-199510000-00012 }}</ref>
* [[Epidural haematoma]] formation (very rare, about 1 in 168,000).<ref name=ox/>
* [[Epidural haematoma]] formation (very rare, about 1 in 168,000).<ref name=ox/>

Revision as of 06:46, 20 December 2017

Epidural administration
A freshly inserted lumbar epidural catheter. The site has been prepared with tincture of iodine, and the dressing has not yet been applied. Depth markings may be seen along the shaft of the catheter.
ICD-9-CM03.90
MeSHD000767
OPS-301 code8-910

Epidural administration (from

nerve fibres
in or near the spinal cord.

The technique of "single-shot" lumbar epidural anaesthesia was first developed in 1921 by Spanish military surgeon Fidel Pagés (1886–1923).[1]

Difference from spinal anaesthesia

Epidural Anesthesia.

Spinal anaesthesia is a technique whereby a local anaesthetic drug is injected into the cerebrospinal fluid. This technique has some similarity to epidural anaesthesia, and lay people often confuse the two techniques. Important differences include:

  • To achieve epidural analgesia or anaesthesia, a larger dose of drug is typically necessary than with spinal analgesia or anaesthesia.
  • The onset of analgesia is slower with epidural analgesia or anaesthesia than with spinal analgesia or anaesthesia.
  • An epidural injection may be performed anywhere along the vertebral column (cervical, thoracic, lumbar, or sacral), while spinal injections are typically performed below the second lumbar vertebral body to avoid piercing and consequently damaging the spinal cord.
  • It is easier to achieve segmental analgesia or anaesthesia using the epidural route than using the spinal route.
  • An indwelling catheter is more commonly placed in the setting of epidural analgesia or anaesthesia than with spinal analgesia or anaesthesia.
  • There is less chances of hypotension after epidural anesthesia as compared to spinal anesthesia
  • Epidural catheter can be continued post operatively to continue analgesia while spinal anesthesia is generally a single shot injection.
  • Epidural anesthesia can be continued for longer duration during longer surgeries by either giving top ups of local anesthetics or by continuous infusion of local anesthetics by infusion pumps.

Indications

Injecting medication into the epidural space is primarily performed for analgesia. This may be performed using a number of different techniques and for a variety of reasons. Additionally, some of the side-effects of epidural analgesia may be beneficial in some circumstances (e.g.,

peripheral vascular disease
). When a catheter is placed into the epidural space (see below) a continuous infusion can be maintained for several days, if needed. Epidural analgesia may be used:

  • For analgesia alone, where surgery is not contemplated. An epidural injection or infusion for pain relief (e.g. in childbirth) is less likely to cause loss of muscle power, but has to be augmented to be sufficient for surgery.
  • As an adjunct to general anaesthesia. The anaesthetist may use epidural analgesia in addition to general anaesthesia. This may reduce the patient's requirement for opioid analgesics. This is suitable for a wide variety of surgery, for example gynaecological surgery (e.g. hysterectomy), orthopaedic surgery (e.g. hip replacement), general surgery (e.g. laparotomy) and vascular surgery (e.g. open aortic aneurysm repair).
  • As a sole technique for surgical anaesthesia. Some operations, most frequently Caesarean section, may be performed using an epidural anaesthetic as the sole technique. This can allow the patient to remain awake during the operation. The dose required for anaesthesia is much higher than that required for analgesia.
  • For post-operative analgesia, after an operation where the epidural technique is employed as the sole anaesthetic, or in conjunction with general anaesthesia. Analgesics are administered into the epidural space typically for a few days after surgery, provided a catheter has been inserted. Through the use of a patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) infusion pump, a person can supplement an epidural infusion with occasional doses of pain medication through an epidural catheter.
  • For the treatment of back pain. Injection of analgesics and steroids into the epidural space may improve some forms of back pain. See below.
  • For the treatment of chronic pain or palliation of symptoms in terminal care, usually in the short- or medium-term.

The epidural space is more difficult and risky to access as one ascends the spine (because the spinal cord gains more nerves as it ascends and fills the epidural space leaving less room for error), so epidural techniques are most suitable for analgesia anywhere in the lower body and as high as the chest. They are (usually) much less suitable for analgesia for the neck, or arms and are not possible for the head (since sensory innervation for the head arises directly from the brain via cranial nerves rather than from the spinal cord via the epidural space.)

Anatomy

subarachnoid space. Superficial to the arachnoid is the dura mater (pink) and although they are unattached, they are kept firmly pressed against one another because of pressure exerted by the CSF. Superficial to the dura mater is a space (pale green), known as the epidural space, that exists between it and the internal surfaces of the vertebral bones and their supporting ligamentous
structures. This space is likewise pressed closed by surrounding tissue pressure, so it is called a 'potential' space. The vertebral bones (taupe) are attached to one another by the interspinous ligaments (teal).

The epidural space is the space inside the bony spinal canal but just outside the dura mater ("dura"). In contact with the inner surface of the dura is another membrane called the arachnoid mater ("arachnoid"). The cerebrospinal fluid that surrounds the spinal cord is contained by the arachnoid mater. In adults, the spinal cord terminates around the level of the disc between L1 and L2 (in neonates it extends to L3 but can reach as low as L4), below which lies a bundle of nerves known as the cauda equina ("horse's tail"). Hence, lumbar epidural injections carry a low risk of injuring the spinal cord.

Insertion of an epidural needle involves threading a needle between the bones, through the ligaments and into the epidural potential space taking great care to avoid puncturing the layer immediately below containing CSF under pressure.

Technique

Procedures involving injection of any substance into the epidural space require the operator to be technically proficient in order to avoid complications.

The subject may be in the seated, lateral or prone positions.

lamina until just before reaching the ligamentum flavum
and the epidural space.

Along with a sudden loss of resistance to pressure on the plunger of the syringe, a slight clicking sensation may be felt by the operator as the tip of the needle breaches the ligamentum flavum and enters the epidural space. Practitioners commonly use air or saline for identifying the epidural space. However, evidence is accumulating that saline is preferable to air, as it is associated with a better quality of analgesia and lower incidence of post-dural-puncture headache.[3][4] In addition to the loss of resistance technique, realtime observation of the advancing needle is becoming more common. This may be done using a portable ultrasound scanner, or with fluoroscopy (moving X-ray pictures).[5]

After placement of the tip of the needle into the epidural space, a catheter is often threaded through the needle. The needle is then withdrawn over the catheter. Generally the catheter is inserted 4–6 cm into the epidural space.[6] The catheter is typically secured to the skin with adhesive tape or dressings to prevent it becoming dislodged.

The catheter is a fine plastic tube, through which anaesthetics may be injected into the epidural space. Many epidural catheters have a blind end but have three or more orifices along the shaft near the distal tip (far end) of the catheter. This not only disperses the injected agents more widely around the catheter, but also reduces the incidence of catheter blockage.

Choice of agents A person receiving an epidural for pain relief may receive local anaesthetic, an opioid, or both. Common local anaesthetics include lidocaine, mepivacaine, bupivacaine, ropivacaine, and chloroprocaine. Common opioids include hydromorphone, morphine, fentanyl, sufentanil, and pethidine (known as meperidine in the United States). These are injected in relatively small doses, compared to when they are injected intravenously. Other agents such as clonidine or ketamine are also sometimes used.

Epidural infusion pump with opioid (sufentanil) and anesthetic (bupivacaine) in a locked box

Bolus or infusion?

For a short procedure, the anaesthetist may introduce a single dose of medication (the "bolus" technique). This will eventually dissipate. Thereafter, the anaesthetist may repeat the bolus provided the catheter remains undisturbed. For a prolonged effect, a continuous infusion of drugs may be employed. There is some evidence that an automated intermittent bolus technique provides better analgesia than a continuous infusion technique, though the total doses are identical.[7][8][9]

Level and intensity of block Typically, the effects of the epidural block are noted below a specific level on the body. This level may be determined by the anaesthetist. A high insertion level may result in sparing of nerve function in the lower spinal nerves. For example, a thoracic epidural may be performed for upper abdominal surgery, but may not have any effect on the perineum (area around the genitals) or pelvic organs.[10] Nonetheless, giving very large volumes into the epidural space may spread the block both higher and lower.

The intensity of the block is determined by the concentration of local anaesthetic solution used. For example, 0.1% bupivacaine may provide adequate analgesia for a woman in labour, but would likely be insufficient for surgical anaesthesia. Conversely, 0.5% bupivacaine would provide a more intense block, likely sufficient for surgery.

Removing the catheter

The catheter is usually removed when the subject is able to take oral pain medications. Catheters can safely remain in place for several days with little risk of bacterial infection,[11][12][13] particularly if the skin is prepared with a chlorhexidine solution.[14] Subcutaneously tunneled epidural catheters may be left in place for longer periods, with a low risk of infection or other complications.[15][16][17]

Special situations

Epidural analgesia during childbirth

Epidural analgesia provides rapid pain relief in most cases. It is more effective than

randomized controlled studies involving 9658 women, wherein all but five studies compared epidural analgesia with opiates, epidural analgesia in childbirth was associated with the following advantages and disadvantages:[18]

Advantages Disadvantages
  • More use of instruments to assist with the birth
  • Increased risk of Caesarean section for fetal distress
  • Longer delivery (second stage of labour)
  • Increased need for oxytocin to stimulate uterine contractions
  • Increased risk of very low blood pressure
  • Increased risk of muscular weakness for a period of time after the birth
  • Increased risk of
    fluid retention
  • Increased risk of fever

However, the review found no difference in overall Caesarean delivery rates, nor were there effects on the baby soon after birth. Also, the occurrence of long-term backache was no different whether an epidural was or was not used.[18]

Though complications are rare, some women and their babies will experience them. Some side effects for the mother include headaches, dizziness, difficulty breathing and seizures. The child may experience slowed heartbeat, temperature regulation issues and there could be high levels of drugs in the child's system from the epidural.[22]

Differing outcomes in frequency of Cesarean section may be explained by differing institutions or their practitioners: epidural anesthesia and analgesia administered at top-rated institutions does not generally result in a clinically significant increase in caesarean rates, whereas the risk of caesarean delivery at poorly ranked facilities seems to increase with the use of epidural.[23]

Regarding early or late administration of epidural analgesia, there is no overall difference in outcomes for first-time mothers in labor.[24] Specifically, the rates of caesarean section, instrumental birth, and duration of labor are equal, as are baby Apgar scores and cord pH.[24]

Epidurals (other than low-dose ambulatory epidurals[25]) preclude maternal movement, but "walking, movement, and changing positions during labor help labor progress, enhance comfort, and decrease the risk of complications."[26]

One study concluded that women whose epidural infusions contained fentanyl were less likely to fully breastfeed their infant in the few days after birth and more likely to stop breastfeeding in the first 24 weeks.[27] However, this study has been criticized for several reasons, one of which is that the original patient records were not examined in this study, and so many of the epidural infusions were assumed to contain fentanyl when almost certainly they would not have.[28] In addition, all those who had received epidural infusions in this study had also received systemic pethidine, which would be much more likely to be the cause of any effect on breastfeeding due to the higher amounts of medication used via that route. If this were the case, then early epidural analgesia which avoided the need for pethidine would be expected to improve breastfeeding outcomes rather than worsen them. Traditional epidural for labor relieves pain reliably only during first stage of labor (uterine contractions until cervix is fully open). It does not relieve pain as reliably during the second stage of labor (passage of the fetus through the vagina).

Epidural analgesia after surgery

Epidural analgesia has been demonstrated to have several benefits after surgery, including:

  • It provides effective analgesia without the need for systemic opioids.[29]
  • The incidence of postoperative respiratory problems and chest infections is reduced.[30]
  • The incidence of postoperative myocardial infarction ("heart attack") is reduced.[31][32]
  • The stress response to surgery is reduced.[31][33]
  • Motility of the intestines is improved by blockade of the sympathetic nervous system.[31][34]
  • Use of epidural analgesia during surgery reduces blood transfusion requirements.[31]

Despite these benefits, no survival benefit has been proven for high-risk individuals.[35]

Caudal epidural analgesia

The caudal approach to the epidural space involves the use of a Tuohy needle, an intravenous catheter, or a hypodermic needle to puncture the

regional anaesthesia
is employed as the sole modality.

Combined spinal-epidural techniques

For some procedures, the anaesthetist may choose to combine the rapid onset and reliable, dense block of a

subarachnoid space
. The spinal dose is then given, the spinal needle withdrawn, and the epidural catheter inserted as normal. This method, known as the "needle-through-needle" technique, may be associated with a slightly higher risk of placing the catheter into the subarachnoid space.

Epidural steroid injection

Epidural steroid injection may be used to treat radiculopathy, radicular pain and inflammation caused by such conditions as spinal disc herniation, degenerative disc disease, and spinal stenosis. Steroids may be injected at the cervical, thoracic, lumbar, or caudal/sacral levels, depending on the specific area where the pathology (disease, condition, or injury) is located.

Side effects

In addition to blocking the nerves which carry pain, local anaesthetic drugs in the epidural space will block other types of nerves as well, in a dose-dependent manner. Depending on the drug and dose used, the effects may last only a few minutes or up to several hours. Epidural analgesia typically involves using the opiates fentanyl or sufentanil, with bupivacaine or one of its congeners. Fentanyl is a powerful opioid with a potency 80 times that of morphine and side effects common to the opiate class. Sufentanil is another opiate, 5 to 10 times more potent than Fentanyl. Bupivacaine is markedly toxic if inadvertently given intravenously, causing excitation, nervousness, tingling around the mouth, tinnitus, tremor, dizziness, blurred vision, or seizures, followed by depression: drowsiness, loss of consciousness, respiratory depression and apnea. Bupivacaine has caused several deaths by cardiac arrest when epidural anaesthetic has been accidentally inserted into a vein instead of the epidural space.

Sensory nerve fibers are more sensitive to the effects of the local anaesthetics than motor nerve fibers. This means that an epidural can provide analgesia while affecting muscle strength to a lesser extent. For example, a labouring woman may have a continuous epidural during labour that provides good analgesia without impairing her ability to move. If she requires a Caesarean section, she may be given a larger dose of epidural local anaesthetic.

The larger the dose used, the more likely it is that side effects will be evident. For example, very large doses of epidural anaesthetic can cause paralysis of the

intercostal muscles and thoracic diaphragm
(which are responsible for breathing), and loss of sympathetic nerve input to the heart, which may cause a significant decrease in heart rate and blood pressure. This may require emergency intervention, which may include support of the airway and the cardiovascular system.

The sensation of needing to urinate is often significantly diminished or even abolished after administration of epidural local anaesthetics and/or opioids. Because of this, a urinary catheter is often placed for the duration of the epidural infusion. People with continuous epidural infusions of local anaesthetic solutions typically ambulate only with assistance, if at all, in order to reduce the likelihood of injury due to a fall.

Large doses of epidurally administered opioids may cause troublesome

itching, and respiratory depression.[36][37][38][39]

Complications

These include:

The figures above relate to epidural anaesthesia and analgesia in healthy individuals.

Evidence to support the assertion that epidural analgesia increases the risk of anastomotic breakdown following bowel surgery is lacking.[34][54]

Controversial claims:

  • "epidural anaesthesia and analgesia significantly slows the second stage of labour". The following are a few plausible hypotheses for this phenomenon:[citation needed]
    • The release of oxytocin, which stimulates the uterine contractions that are needed to move the child out through the vagina, may be decreased with epidural anaesthesia or analgesia due to factors involving the reduction of stress, such as:
      • Epidural analgesia may reduce the endocrine stress response to pain[55]
        • Diminished release of epinephrine from the adrenal medulla slows the release of oxytocin[56]
      • Diminished blood pressure, accommodated by both decreased stress and less adrenal release, may decrease the release of oxytocin as a natural mechanism to avoid hypotension.[57] It may also affect the heart-rate of the fetus.[58]
  • Still plausible (though less studied without a documented reproduction in a laboratory setting) are the effects of the reclined position of the woman on the fetus, both immediately prior to and during delivery.[citation needed]
    • These hypotheses generally posit an interaction with the force of gravity on fetal position and movement, as demonstrated by the following examples:[citation needed]
      • Transverse or posterior fetal positioning may become more likely as a result of the shift in orientation to gravitational force.[citation needed]
      • Diminished gravitational assistance is present in building pressure for commencing delivery and for progressing the fetus along the vagina.[citation needed]
    • It is important to note that the orientation of the fetus can be established by ultrasonic stenography prior to, during, and after the administration of an epidural block. This would seem a fine experiment for testing the first hypothesis. It should also be noted that the majority of fetal movement through the vagina is accomplished by cervical contractions, and so the role of gravity and its force relative to the position of the woman in labour (on delivery, not development) is difficult to establish.[citation needed]
  • There has been a good deal of concern, based on older observational studies, that women who have epidural analgesia during labour are more likely to require a cesarean delivery.[59] However, the preponderance of evidence now supports the conclusion that the use of epidural analgesia during labour does not have a significant effect on rates of cesarean delivery. A Cochrane review of twenty trials involving a total of 6534 women estimated that women undergoing labour using epidural analgesia were only slightly more likely (1.07 times as likely) to undergo cesarean delivery than those in whom epidural analgesia was not used.

Epidural analgesia does increase the duration of the second stage of labour by 15 to 30 minutes and may increase the rate of instrument-assisted vaginal deliveries as well as that of oxytocin administration.[60][61] Some people have also been concerned about whether the use of epidural analgesia in early labour increases the risk of cesarean delivery. Three randomized, controlled trials showed that early initiation of epidural analgesia (cervical dilatation, <4 cm) does not increase the rate of cesarean delivery among women with spontaneous or induced labour, as compared with early initiation of analgesia with parenteral opioids.[62][63][64]

History

Fidel Pagés visiting injured soldiers at the Docker Hospital in Melilla in 1909.

In 1885, American neurologist James Leonard Corning (1855–1923), of Acorn Hall in Morristown, NJ, was the first to perform neuraxial blockade, when he injected 111 mg of cocaine into the epidural space of a healthy male volunteer[65] (although at the time he believed he was injecting it into the subarachnoid space).[66]

In 1921, Spanish military surgeon Fidel Pagés (1886–1923) developed the technique of "single-shot" lumbar epidural anaesthesia,[1] which was later popularized by Italian surgeon Achille Mario Dogliotti (1897–1966).[67]

In 1941, Robert Andrew Hingson (1913–1996) and Waldo B. Edwards developed the technique of continuous caudal anaesthesia using an indwelling needle.[68] The first use of continuous caudal anaesthesia in a labouring woman was in 1942.[69]

In 1947, Manuel Martínez Curbelo (1906–1962) was the first to describe placement of a lumbar epidural catheter.[70]

References

  1. ^ a b Pagés, F (1921). "Anestesia metamérica". Revista de Sanidad Militar (in Spanish). 11: 351–4.
  2. ^ "Epidural Steroid Injections". Pain Management Specialists.
  3. PMID 15098532
    .
  4. .
  5. .
  6. .
  7. .
  8. .
  9. .
  10. .
  11. .
  12. .
  13. .
  14. .
  15. .
  16. .
  17. .
  18. ^
    PMID 22161362.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link
    )
  19. ^ Buckley, Sarah. "Epidurals: risks and concerns for mother and baby". Mothering No.133. Retrieved April 18, 2014.
  20. .
  21. .
  22. ^ "Anesthesia". Harvard University Press. Retrieved April 18, 2014.
  23. PMID 8826170
    .
  24. ^ .
  25. ^ Dr Hayley Willacy; Dr Colin Tidy (June 16, 2014). "Pain relief in labour". Patient.info. EMIS. Retrieved September 2, 2014.
  26. PMID 19750214
    .
  27. PMID 17134489.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link
    )
  28. .
  29. .
  30. .
  31. ^ .
  32. .
  33. .
  34. ^ .
  35. .
  36. .
  37. .
  38. .
  39. .
  40. ^ Agaram R, Douglas MJ, McTaggart RA, Gunka V. Inadequate pain relief with labour epidurals: a multivariate analysis of associated factors. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009.18(1):10–4.
  41. PMID 2655500
    .
  42. .
  43. ^ .
  44. ^ Wang, Yen-Feng; Wang, Shuu-Jiun (March 10, 1994). "Headache associated with low CSF pressure". MedLink.
  45. PMID 19210132
    .
  46. .
  47. .
  48. .
  49. .
  50. ^ a b c d "Epidurals and risk: it all depends [May 2007; 159–3]". Archived from the original on December 23, 2012. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  51. PMID 7574052
    .
  52. ^ .
  53. .
  54. .
  55. .
  56. ^ Gregory M. "Endocrine System: Posterior Pituitary". Archived from the original on December 13, 2007. Retrieved July 5, 2011. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  57. PMID 16249339
    .
  58. ^ Mayo Clinic Staff. "Labor and Delivery: Pain Medications – Epidural Block". Retrieved July 5, 2011.
  59. PMID 10511367
    .
  60. .
  61. .
  62. .
  63. .
  64. .
  65. ^ Corning, JL (1885). "Spinal anaesthesia and local medication of the cord". New York Medical Journal. 42: 483–5.
  66. PMID 7848956
    .
  67. .
  68. .
  69. .
  70. .

Further reading

External links