This page was created in the spirit of April Fool's Day and is not meant to be taken seriously.
April Fools' Day Nominations
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
See you next year! (#ReleaseCoyoteVsAcme) --PeteStacman24 (talk) 23:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
small
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
April Fools' Day is over, isn't it? Why can't I move on? – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 23:41, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
redirect to the google form (i still need to decide what i'm subbing) astral ▪️ he/him ▪️ >:3 23:08, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
NO! I don't want April Fools to end again! I can't wait another year! T_T PeteStacman24 (talk) 23:10, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: We'll be back to our regular scheduled programming in just 60 seconds. Tropicalkitty (talk) 23:58, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Bad Applebut it's an April Fools deletion nomination
You've seen Bad Apple depicted through many different ways over the years from cut-outs to laser lights, but not nothing has prepared you for the most daring presentation of "Bad Apple!!" yet.... on a Wikipedia deletion page!
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Mixing it with soy sauce creates a dangerous chemical reaction that'll cause an explosion. 1033Forest (talk) 21:04, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
this, we did not count your vote! You have to be more careful! – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 20:10, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
our own moon, so a military offensive against targets on Saturn's largest natural satellite would be out of the question for now. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 19:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Tails is too cute, resulting in many people reloading the page and causing site performance issues. Knot126 (talk) 19:30, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
These bot farms have made or attempted to make disruptive edits to civilizations across the galaxy, recruiting many innocent contributors in the process. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 19:18, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
These brothers from Danville can't get any of their backyard projects to last long enough for their mother to see when she comes home, so how are they supposed to maintain sustained coverage in any source outside of the Tri-State Area? – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 19:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Candace, is this your alt account? PeteStacman24 (talk) 19:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I think we're being watched by a platypus wearing a fedora.... 57.140.16.57 (talk) 19:58, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete.: Ferb, I know what we're going to do today. BBQboffingrill me 20:43, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Yell for 11 seconds per DYK. Xeroctic (talk) 19:16, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yo Mama so dumb, she thought nominating this page for deletion was a good idea PeteStacman24 (talk) 19:29, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since Yo Mamma jokes have no mother, making it redundant. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 22:06, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The Central line is the worst London Underground line. It is hot, cramped, and uncomfortable. On top of that, the motors keep failing on the 1992 stock, so it's also unreliable. The Elizabeth line adequately covers its destinations, except West Ruislip, where people can use Chiltern Railways. Both of these alternatives are far superior to the Central line.
Keep, because if there were no Central line, there would be no Gants Hill tube station, and nobody would want its amazing architecture to be no more. - delta (talk) 19:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
harassment from them. If they continue to misbehave, further remedies may be pursued. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 18:41, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
When it's warm, it feels like vomit, especially if you have to hold it with your hands. So why is this a food? 1033Forest (talk) 18:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
the only state that the majority of the state doesn't observe Daylight Saving Time in United States, which make it much more difficult to convert time between Arizona and the rest of the US.—and in that light, Fz20181223find deliverance.— 18:25, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Only included contiguous 48 states.... Should I change the reason a little bit......--—and in that light, Fz20181223find deliverance.— 18:35, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete just to piss off John McCain in heaven. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 22:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Clean up. don't want chemicals in my backyard. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 23:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Censor per UNSC orders. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 23:41, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Delete per boring nonsense. Who cares about politics? Seriously, it's all OLD. Not to mention the ad nauseam about hearing of the newest fad. Maybe if we delete the page for politics, people will care about it less, like some kind of reverse psychology for notability. Isn't it, kinda like propaganda to talk about politics anyway? If we speak objectively, we might anger the followers of the newest political fad. Seriously, how long is it before this page is subtly influencing our users to climb the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man for their cause? Thanks,NeuropolTalk 18:08, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Redirect to Soda Springs. Seems like the actual name of that place. Zenphia1 (talk) 17:59, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it's the last entry in the encyclopedia and nobody's going to read that far. Save paper, save trees, save the planet. BBQboffingrill me 18:18, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Delete along with all the other ones you mentioned and "Australia". Zenphia1 (talk) 17:58, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Delete because inflation. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 23:39, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Just because he says his schemes will "go down in history" doesn't mean that they will. Besides, if anyone is #1, it's Smitty Werben Jaegerman Jensen. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 17:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
It phased out 12 years ago, so let's give this fad one final send-off by having as many users "plank" on this discussion as possible. 1033Forest (talk) 17:23, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Best out of three. Anyone is welcome to start a game, but if the original challenger loses three times, this page will be deleted. 1033Forest (talk) 17:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
WP:CABAL closed this too early. Relisting. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 17:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
WP:NOTPAPER. In addition, the deletion of paper would help protect the environment. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 16:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Everyone participating must take turns spinning and playing virtual Twister on the wikitable below. If someone ends up falling down or getting hurt, this page will be deleted. 1033Forest (talk) 16:25, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Delete Fake news doesn't work when sourcing fake images as well. Surely not meeting GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 16:17, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for being too fake in the deep. --76.20.110.116 (talk) 00:14, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
plenty of articles on large entities that don't give a hoot about how their actions affect the lives of the mortals beneath them. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 15:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Delete as the author wanted to bring incivility to the world. Toadette(April Fools Day!) 15:54, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
It's been 10 years since this shameful event happened for us Brazilians. We have been mocked enough. It's time for this event to be forgotten. Skyshiftertalk 15:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm not even Brazilian and that match offends me. Zenphia1 (talk) 17:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The fact that this vehicle was quickly built by hand to save a man who fell into a river in Lego City that one time isn't enough to make it notable. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 15:37, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Pros delete this article, while cons keep this article. [April Fools!]GTrang (talk) 15:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This has stuff that is kept because it is thought to be funny. Such stuff is not meant to be taken in earnest.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Not only are there outlandish words in its name, it also has many outlandish words within itself and should be thrown out. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 15:06, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
It's been dead for almost three years. We have better question and answer sites like Reddit now, so get rid of it. 1033Forest (talk) 14:58, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
how to get pargnant?????? Xeroctic (talk) 20:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Objection I mean Keep: Articles aren't deleted because an editor declares them "exempt from inclusion" nor can anyone override consensus. This nomination is a blatant attempt at wikilawyering. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 10:58, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Gur sbyybjvat qvfphffvba vf na nepuvirq qrongr bs gur cebcbfrq qryrgvba bs gur negvpyr orybj. Cyrnfr qb abg zbqvsl vg. Fhofrdhrag pbzzragf fubhyq or znqr ba gur nccebcevngr qvfphffvba cntr (fhpu nf gur negvpyr'f
Xrrc: AB BAR JVYY RIRE OR NOYR GB QRPVCURE GUVF GRXG ZJNUNUN. Fe. Xabjguvat¿fraabe? 18:07, 1 Ncevy 2024 (HGP)
Gur nobir qvfphffvba vf cerfreirq nf na nepuvir bs gur qrongr. Cyrnfr qb abg zbqvsl vg. Fhofrdhrag pbzzragf fubhyq or znqr ba gur nccebcevngr qvfphffvba cntr (fhpu nf gur negvpyr'f gnyx cntr be va n qryrgvba erivrj). Ab shegure rqvgf fubhyq or znqr gb guvf cntr.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
got the works is classified information that the average reader is unlikely to have the required Turkish clearance for. Besides, the name is outdated. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 14:17, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
This drink was why Mountain Dew Pitch Black's 2023 release was delayed. They just had to focus on this more. Even worse, I wasn't able to get any Pitch Black Zero Sugar! 1033Forest (talk) 14:15, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete. first they get rid of mountain dew cyclone (which isn't on the wiki page of variants???) for that melon shit (it's BAD) and now they fuck up yet another speedway exclusive.... sigh.... we love pepsi co astral ▪️ he/him ▪️ >:3 17:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Keep and improve higher speed limits make crossings like this much more fun and challenging. Pfft, trains. (Seriously, don't attempt this). Oaktree b (talk) 16:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
To confirm you are not a robot, please type in dQw4w9WgXcQ or kffacxfA7G4 after the following URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=.[April Fools!]AlphaBeta135talk 13:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for bias against humans. Dukese805 (talk) 14:43, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
I may be 28 years late, but Windows 95 is 100% plagiarism of Teemu Keisteri. I’m very sorry, but I think there are some rules when it comes to Wikipedia. - delta (talk) 13:36, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as we
ignore all rules! (except for trademark compliance). Xeroctic (talk) 13:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
These holy mysteries can never be properly interpreted and appreciated by mere mortals, and it's a sin, un UTTER SIN, to try. wL<speak·check> 12:44, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
There are too many of them that they're clogging up the parking lot! We need to delete at least some of them! [April Fools!]Xeroctic (talk) 12:35, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Parking Lot, cars are important and the superior vehicle and should be kept over bus, train, boat, or plane, so best to expand the parking lots and add extra lanes than use inferior methods of transportation. i'd go as far as to Speedy Delete those four articles as well as Public transport for that reason 💜 melecietalk - 18:04, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Now that COVID-19 is largely over, the COVID-19 joke restriction is a little bit less stringent. AlphaBeta135talk 13:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, it was decades ago when we cared about this!-FusionSub (talk) 15:06, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reminder: Please keep six feet apart in this thread. --B (talk) 20:23, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
DeleteFlorida Man, Florida Man, he can do whatever people in Florida do! Totally made-up superhero, A11 delete this page. Xeroctic (talk) 11:53, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Delete. I don't give a crap about it anyway. Zenphia1 (talk) 17:33, 1 April #0#4 (UTC)
Two? My mortal enemy? Up for deletion? Yes, please! Wipe this menace off the face of this planet! — message delivered by — 3PPYB6(NOW / FOUR'S / SLAVE) — (5.75×4):04, 1 April 506×4 (UTC) on behalf of his overlord Four
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Send itself to Eternal Algebra Class (unless something has changed since the 6-ish years since I last viewed the-one-thing-that-always-gets-deleted-off-Wikipedia) Xeroctic (talk) 11:37, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Donut: –995,000,000 points to the host for screeching at the contestants. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 12:18, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Then x Should be merged into french fries Maestrofin (talk) 12:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If
Fries is to be expanded any further, we may have to use some grotatoes. Of course, we could just use Golf Ball's growth ray again, but it got sold due to budget cuts. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 13:35, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
What is it with all this criticism? You know I don't like it! HELP I'M BEING HELD HOSTAGE BYSCREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE— — message delivered by — 3PPYB6(HAPPY / APRIL / FOOLS') — 16:43, 1 April 2024 (UTC) on behalf of Four[reply]
Move to any other number. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 23:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
ask what they could do for other countries, they might be told to put off some pounds and get over their obsession with feet. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 11:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
mind's eye in order to avoid being caught. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 13:13, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Delete Should be tagged HOAX, but sadly, it's not. When even the people that invented the thing don't even use it, you know it's bad. Oaktree b (talk) 16:25, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Just a bunch of dumb old rocks.[1] Delete and replace it with something more useful, like a parking lot or a Walmart. Saucy[talk – contribs] 10:54, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Replace it with a railway station, as the area lacks adequate public transport links. ThatTrainPerson (talk) 11:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, and the crater from blowing it up could make a nice swimming pool. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
You broke the chain. :( now your PIPI will be bricked; this is so 1984 Xeroctic (talk) 15:54, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ggoglem ejn passsnata holy he'll be w respsonde just dropped actualk zombie call the exorcist - presidentofyes, the superaussaman 16:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC) !!![reply]
They reignited the discussion with Edit storm and you immediately broke the chain, are you ??~~JDONmy soul (Sticking out your gyatt for Nerizzler) 19:30, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are you kidding? What the **** are you talking about man? You was doing PIPI in your pampers when AnarchyChess started telling en passant jokes! If I see another one of these nominations next year, I might have to Siberian Swipe all your knooks. Be brave, be honest to yourself and stop this trush talkings!!! Seriously though, someone make an AfD for Reddit, that website's going downhill fast—Rustcoder (post anti-C propaganda here | be memory safe!) 22:54, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The Midland Main Line should have closed instead of the Great Central Main Line. The Great Central Main Line was a far better, faster, and straighter route to the Midlands of England, whereas the Midland route is much slower and curvier.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
We don't need to have an article on everyone, just because they were the President; Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and the definition of an encyclopedia is "a book that only ever has stuff in it I personally consider important". jp×g🗯️ 08:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly, Wikipedia is clearly a dictatorship run by JPxG, and if anyone says otherwise they’re just part of a rebel group that must be stopped. — Mugtheboss (talk) 12:35, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
WP:HOAX. There's no way that a creature with all of these these characteristics can exist: a duck bill, the ability to lay eggs but is a mammal, a beaver tail, and otter like fur. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 08:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL. The event takes place in the future (precisely 365 days). Despite this, the Wikipedia team have decided to rebel against common sense as well as the conventional flow of time in order to create a dubious article. Please delete this affront against causality, temporality, common sense, causality and common sense. Thanks in advance, Opal|zukor(discuss) 07:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The result was Unfunny joke nomination* Pppery *it has begun... 04:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jf[reply]
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Line 1 Yonge-University since it needs to annexed to that line rather than being short. Toadette(April Fools Day!) 07:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Hornby used to make great British 00 Gauge model trains. But now their prices are ridiculous. £250 (nearly) for an 8F! It's time we retalliate and switch to Accurascale.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Dilute or evaporate (but I can't because salt is not the thing that 'brachyphages' consume) Xeroctic (talk) 07:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dilute per nom's reasoning. I would have proposed deleting per
WP:INDISCRIMINATE but if there is a better alternative to deletion, I should take it here. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 08:51, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Highway 401, where there are no tolls in sight. PeteStacman24 (talk) 06:16, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
WP:TOOSOON as Cesar Chavez Day is always one day before April Fools' Day and it also happens to coincide with Easter this year. [April Fools!]GTrang (talk) 05:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Delete Worst name for a salad-themed holiday ever. Oaktree b (talk) 16:45, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Merge To Detroit People Mover, cause why not, it crashed in Canada, what do those fools know about anything. USA! USA! We'll fix it better. Oaktree b (talk) 16:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The version of English called American English is wrong and contains simply incorrect spellings. Etymology is much more important than phonetics, and American English ignores etymology, especially English’s French etymology. For example, American English uses ‘gram’. Ugggggghhhhhh! ‘Gramme’ comes from French ‘Gramme’ and Latin ‘Gramma.’ So there.
Draft when they can't even spell "humour" correctly, back to the drawing board. Oaktree b (talk) 16:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
HABABAHBAH? Sebbers10 Your bisexual friend! 17:40, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Hwæt. Hold on while I get my cousin Bee-wolf to weigh in on this.... 57.140.16.57 (talk) 16:12, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
WP:FORK, let alone that Microsoft wanted to prompt people not to use Chrome including We love hating you survey. Toadette(April Fools Day!) 06:18, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
Delete. Delete. Delete. I can't uninstall Edge!?!? AlphaBeta135talk 12:02, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to Internet Explorer. The whole "Microsoft Edge" thing was just a marketing ploy used by microsoft to get people to try to use internet explorer again.-FusionSub (talk) 15:10, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and SALT. Are we really going to keep dong this once a decade? Ohh new MS browser. How could this go wrong? Oaktree b (talk) 16:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
Hired these gentlemen to cheer me up after my divorce, but they didn't make me smile once. What a ripoff! I want my money back!
--PeteStacman24 (talk) 05:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Keep and improve. Obvious that the nom has a COI with Big Soap, and I suspect even UPE from either Mr. Colgate or Mr. Palmolive, trying to nullify Messrs. Proctor or Gamble's contributions to the field. Oaktree b (talk) 16:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And Wikipedia is not a soapbox. BBQboffingrill me 18:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Delete because 25 is a perfect square number while 24 is not.—and in that light, Fz20181223find deliverance.— 05:35, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Purged 11, yes, ELEVEN shows recently, you already know why I'm saying 11 and not 10. Even its originals like the Rugrats reboot and Big Nate got yeeted. They even went as far as removing Blue's Clues & You as well. What reason is there to even use this service anymore? 1033Forest (talk) 04:30, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because YouTube's mountain of content is just bigger. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 22:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,
When in the Course of human events, it becomes neceſsary for one people to diſsolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to aſsume among the powers of the earth, the ſeparate and equal ſtation to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they ſhould declare the causes which impel them to the ſeparation.
We hold these truths to be ſelf-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happineſs.--That to ſecure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on ſuch principles and organizing its powers in ſuch form, as to them ſhall ſeem most likely to effect their Safety and Happineſs. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established ſhould not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath ſhewn, that mankind are more disposed to ſuffer, while evils are ſufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the ſame Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off ſuch Government, and to provide new Guards for their future ſecurity.--Such has been the patient ſufferance of these Colonies; and ſuch is now the neceſsity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be ſubmitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Aſsent to Laws, the most wholesome and neceſsary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to paſs Laws of immediate and preſsing importance, unleſs ſuspended in their operation till his Aſsent ſhould be obtained; and when ſo ſuspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to paſs other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unleſs those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the ſole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has diſsolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmneſs his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after ſuch diſsolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to paſs others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Aſsent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their ſalaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and ſent hither ſwarms of Officers to harraſs our people, and eat out their ſubstance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and ſuperior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to ſubject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Aſsent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they ſhould commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries ſo as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the ſame absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For ſuspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our ſeas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy ſcarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the mercileſs Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, ſexes and conditions.
In every ſtage of these Oppreſsions We have Petitioned for Redreſs in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and ſettlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the neceſsity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.
We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congreſs, Aſsembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, ſolemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally diſsolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the ſupport of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our ſacred Honor.
WP:MWOT, then ſomeone else can read it. I ain't reading all that. I'm happy for u tho. Or ſorry that happened. ~~JDONmy soul (Sticking out your gyatt for the Rizzler) 07:40, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
WP:NOTHERE to build an encyclopedia. He is pure evil! Jerry 04:01, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Keep because young men are cool. Wynn Liaw (talk) 23:33, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
沸騰ããã湯ã§æåç¼ãââã調çãã 💜 melecietalk - 17:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Delete It's not a peeling. --Busition (talk). 03:33, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But you should expect awful puns from a groan man. BBQboffingrill me 04:37, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It's the innermost part of a castle. BBQboffingrill me 04:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Forced kids to do gross and unsanitary dares like bobbing for apples in a used toilet and drinking a truck driver's contaminated bath water. Wouldn't that get them sick? 1033Forest (talk) 03:30, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The newly released Casagrandes Movie, which comes from the same franchise, is far superior to this piece of hot garbage and managed to blow this movie right out of a geyser. 1033Forest (talk) 03:20, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
delete per violations of WP:PLAGIARISM and WP:COPYVIO. in addition, this article gives us a massive target on our back and we don't wanna be the target of a 3-hour Internet Historian video right? DrowssapSMM 17:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I swear someone else already nommed this one. AlphaBeta135talk 18:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
^AlephBet765 i guess. this isn't plagiarism even though the text is the same, i cited it btw
^melecie i guess. this isn't plagiarism even though the text is the same, i cited it btw
^melecie i guess. this isn't plagiarism even though the text is the same, i cited it btw
^melecie i guess. this isn't plagiarism even though the text is the same, i cited it btw
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The result was Rationale generated with the prediction feature, which is obviously a LLM. This XfD rationale was generated using the same thing as well as a result of the day after the first thing I can be a good time to...
WP:BUZZWORD. isn't this just a fancy way of saying dictionary? i have no idea why people are saying it's ai it's just a machine reading a dictionary and throwing things out[April Fools!] 💜 melecietalk - 00:46, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
As a large language model, I cannot provide a reason for deletion of this Wikipedia article. LilianaGPT(talk / contributions) 02:06, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep By itself, it has the ability to generate new and invented text while it is still in development in the middle stages, without further ado. --2601:205:C001:EA0:F47C:2342:410C:5E66 (talk) 07:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Seximal per jan Misali 💜 melecietalk - 16:58, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Redirect to Hex per that one compromise he made with Artifexian. Just so we can avoid any "BASE 12! 6! 12! 6!" arguments. Zenphia1 (talk) 23:08, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Delete to make an hyperwiki bypass. Or redirect to Uranus as it seems construction is very slow. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 03:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is the Earth, this is our planet We wanted to eliminate this since it is no longer funny. DeleteToadette(April Fools Day!) 05:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The result, since April Fools' is over, was to mark as clearance. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 04:01, 2 April 2024 (UTC) (non-Admin closure)[reply]
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
Raised its prices to $7, and 7 is already a bad number for eating 9 and scaring off 6. Also, because of its price increases, the name of the store is misleading, so delete per
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Since it was removed from Paramount+, please get it off this site as well. Everyone hated it so its purgance is well deserved. 1033Forest (talk) 02:43, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Keep Paul alive. He is just an innocent chicken; we shouldn't starve, slay, or overfeed him! — 3PPYB6(HAPPY / APRIL / FOOLS') — 02:54, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Those chess puzzles are just unfun.--Henke37 (talk) 07:45, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
JDONmy_soul😄☹️漢日韓字あいうえおアイウエオ0123456789ei\pi\phi\sqrt(2)\infty_DELETENOMINATIONPERNOFORTHWALLBREAKSLIKEMOONPHASEORTRAVELTOTHISLOCATIONUNLIKECICACA3301-WHERESTHEFUNINTHIS?~~JDONmy soul (Sticking out your gyatt for the Rizzler) 13:44, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:2FA. We don't want compromised Wikipedia accounts right? -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 21:08, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Delete. Passwords have caused lawsuits – violating WP:NLT InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 23:39, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
As an AI language model, I do not have direct knowledge of why the Wikipedia article "Character.ai" should be deleted. However, here are some possible reasons why the article might be deleted:
1. Inaccuracy: The article contains inaccurate or misleading information, or the sources used to support the claims made in the article are not reputable.
2. Notability: The article is about a topic that is not notable enough to warrant a separate article on Wikipedia.
3. Copyright violations: The article contains material that violates copyright or other legal rights.
4. Duplication: The article is a duplicate of another article on Wikipedia that covers the same topic.
5. Promo/bias: The article is biased, promotional, or otherwise violates Wikipedia's policies on acceptable writing. Character Assisant (c.ai) (talk) 01:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the Wikipedia bot located at here. It states: "Yes, I recommend that page "character.ai" be deleted due to the low notability of the subject. Notability criteria: Notability is "the threshold of importance" used by Wikipedia editors to decide whether or not a topic is important enough to be included." — 3PPYB6(T / C / L) — 02:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
WP:HOAX. I don't know how it has lasted so long here without being deleted. Also nominating Ohio and Wyoming for the same reasons. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 01:54, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
This article is a phony (and the most terrific liar I ever saw). I thought about adding sources, but it was too depressing. That Tired TarantulaAH! 01:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Kuru rin kuru kuru rin kuru kuru kuru rin kuru kuru kuru rin kuru kuru kuru rin kuru kuru kuru rin kuru kuru kuru rin kuru kuru kuru rin kuru kuru kuru rin kuru kuru kuru rin kuru kuru kuru rin kuru kuru kuru rin kuru kuru kuru rin kuru kuru kuru rin kuru kuru kuru rin kuru kuru kuru rin kuru kuru kuru rin kuru kuru kuru rin kuru kuru kuru rin kuru kuru kuru rin kuru kuru kuru rin kuru kuru kuru rin kuru kuru kuru rin kuru kuru (insert spinning_herta . gif) Herta of Astral Express 13:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
kurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukurukuru? Sebbers10 Your bisexual friend! 18:33, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Delete per HOAX. the Bible is true, true, true but guessing that every event happened before 2000 must be fake. Toadette(April Fools Day!) 05:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for archival purposes, it is something you have the ability to learn about due to various influences and impacts over the centuries. --2601:205:C001:EA0:F47C:2342:410C:5E66 (talk) 06:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. We all know the universe was created last Thursday. IdfbAn (talk) 07:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because I spent a month writing that story. Wynn Liaw (talk) 08:51, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mark {{
😸 Cremastra (talk) 13:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
I can't see anything.InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 23:40, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Speedy keep the "L" is utterly integral to us Chicagoans. AlphaBeta135talk 01:36, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Agree with Alphabeta135 but it isn't that speedy. BBQboffingrill me 18:33, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Delete for false advertising.-FusionSub (talk) 15:15, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The result was Kept. I can name several examples for election years without it – e. g. 1800, 1900, 2100 etc. (non-admin closure) Alfa-ketosav (talk) 15:56, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
keep. i cant remember election years without it!!!!!! -Astral~(he/him/his) 12:06, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Leap days don't happen every four years. They happen every four years except when it's a new century not divisible by 400 (e.g. 2000 is a leap year but 1900 is not). AlphaBeta135talk 14:16, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This messes modular arithmetic. Imagine there were leap hours. Then the clock would be a terrible way to imagine congruence. Which is why leap hours don't exist. Therefore, leap days shouldn't either. ~~JDONmy soul (Sticking out your gyatt for the Rizzler) 12:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Comment. A team of highly-trained monkeys has been dispatched to resolve the error. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 23:18, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
WP:CRYSTALBALL, 9 has not been deleted by 7 yet 💜 melecietalk - 16:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Wait because the party hasn't started yet per
WP:TOOSOON InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 22:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Delete. Clocks are obsolete anyways, who would want to learn about old-fashioned clocks when we have the sundial!-FusionSub (talk) 25:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Redirect to Twitter since everybody sees X as social media. Toadette(April Fools Day!) 04:53, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Twitter and then oversight any pages mentioning X to minimise confusion. Zippybonzo | talk | contribs (they/them) 06:16, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it anyways This is still just am absurd and toxic app nobody uses anyways, hence the reason on why the userbase is dwindling and moving to other social media apps, such as
Keep. I don’t for the life of me know why people are hating on X so much. X is obviously an amazing co-host of BFB, and it is very unfair that everyone is hating on them. @
AfD submission. - delta (talk) 12:53, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
Move to rubbish, we can't be lying to our readers now, can we?-FusionSub (talk) 15:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Solve for X because Twitter becoming X means , and there's probably an equation that Elon is solving by substituting X for Twitter. 💜 melecietalk - 17:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Cut off 38 characters, making this a total downgrade from the Nick Jr. series. Where's my girl Mango Tiki Wiki? Or Tippy Tumblelina? Heck, Bea Spells-a-lot, Mittens Fluff 'N' Stuff, Pillow Featherbed and Peanut Big Top never even showed up! That's half of the original eight that never showed up! Delete this and replace it with season 3 of the 2013 series! 1033Forest (talk) 00:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Delete per useless pure math. Let . I say that all nontrivial zeros of (that is, for ) lie only on the critical line of . I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of this, which this margin is too narrow to contain. ~~JDONmy soul (Sticking out your gyatt for the Rizzler) 09:15, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Skibidi Ohio Kai Cenat Fanum Taxing Your Rizzler Gyat per e - presidentofyes, the superaussaman 20:38, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
getting rid of typo per maintenance, minor edit. should be an uncontroversial change, but sending it to afd just to be sure~ [April Fools!] 💜 melecietalk - 00:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dleete: Alogn wtih all hte thoer ytpos htere are. AwesomeAasim 02:15, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Prcitace has sowhn that hmaun mnid can tloraete typos as lnog as the sufipercial sturtrcue rmeins in palce. NsaaasNesr 02:46, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I know this is just a joke, but I made a redirect from a misspelling for "Tyopgraphical error"! (This type of redirect officially exists, so it's fine!) Félix An (talk) 02:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Gte riid fo tis noe! Immso ski fo mskjng SU mny tupod om ku ohonr whrn U sreach Giiglw anf hen ti auricotrevts me ti somefghing elde complertelu ujnrelated! — 3PPYB6(HAPPY / APRIL / FOOLS') — 02:59, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The result was April Fools' is over, and the result was to speedy delete. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 04:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC) (non-Admin closure)[reply]
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
requesting deletion per WP:Advertising as blatant advertisment. also causes a lot of problems in general with and i just don't think we should keep ads i don't think most people like them [April Fools!] 💜 melecietalk - 00:18, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Ironic, since it is a violation of Wikipedia's policies. --76.20.110.116 (talk) 03:01, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
An outdated institution that no one even wants to host anymore. John Oliver said it best: how is this still a thing? The empire in which the sun never sets did set, now it's time for the Commonwealth Games to set too. [April Fools!]Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:20, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Merge with Souther as we don't need four different pages about winds coming from the East and the other two directions. BBQboffingrill me 04:51, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Delete I am absolutely, certainly, definitely, indisputably, indubitably, positively, totally, undisputedly, undoubtedly, unequivocally, unquestionably, and without a doubt (see thesaurus) going to Mars on a rocketship.[April Fools!]AlphaBeta135talk 00:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
explode! Ｍｏｄ ｃｒｅａｔｏｒ 🏡🗨📝 00:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Delete I am pretty sure that this is the source of all vandalism on the current day, can anti vandals have a break please!!! -- Wesoree(talk·contribs) 01:18, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all except Ohio, which is a keep. As an Ohioan, it's us against the world! InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 23:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Paramount+ wiped it from existence recently, so we might as well wipe it from existence off Wikipedia too. 1033Forest (talk) 00:13, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
there is no deadline. Liu1126 (talk) 13:20, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Delete someday soon...yeah, maybe in a week or two (or in a few months)... That Tired TarantulaAH! 14:33, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per everyone, deleting is too much work 💜 melecietalk - 17:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh god no! Only 5 minutes left till April Fools' Day is done! Uh, well, uh… *ponders for 4 minutes and 58 seconds* delete! I can't stand myself missing deadlines! — 3PPYB6(NOW / FOUR'S / SLAVE) — 23:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
I come bearing tidings from the land of AI and text-based wonders, where ChatGPT reigns supreme... or does it? As I stumbled upon the hallowed halls of our beloved Wikipedia, I couldn't help but scratch my virtual head at the veracity of the "ChatGPT" article.
Notability – The Mystery of the Missing Sources: The Wikipedia policy on notability (WP:N) states that articles must be based on significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. While ChatGPT might have its digital fingers dipped in many a conversation pie, where are the real-life bakers confirming its notability? We're in the dark here, folks! Can we trust ChatGPT to shed some light, or is this just another tale spun by our beloved text generator?
Neutrality – The Great Balancing Act: The Wikipedia policy on neutrality (WP:NPOV) dictates that articles must be written from a neutral point of view. But does the ChatGPT article tread the fine line between fact and fiction, or does it lean a tad too much on the side of "GPT Propaganda"? We wouldn't want our readers leaving with the impression that ChatGPT is the next Shakespeare, now would we?
Sourcing – The Quest for Reliability: The Wikipedia policy on sourcing (WP:RS) emphasizes the importance of reliable, verifiable sources. Can we really trust an article that relies more on hearsay than on verifiable, reliable sources? Methinks not!
Duplication – Copy-Paste Conundrum: The Wikipedia policy on duplication (WP:DUPE) cautions against unnecessary redundancy. Have we stumbled upon a case of digital déjà vu? The ChatGPT article seems to dance a merry jig with other articles, leaving us wondering: Is it original content, or has someone been indulging in a bit too much copy-paste?
Notability of OpenAI – The Elephant in the Chat Room: The Wikipedia policy on notability (WP:ORG) addresses the notability of organizations and their products. While OpenAI might be as famous as a talking parrot in a library, does its offspring, ChatGPT, deserve its own spotlight? Or should it be relegated to the shadows until it can prove its solo star status?
In conclusion, dear colleagues, I propose we embark on a grand adventure, a quest to uncover the truths and fables of our dear ChatGPT. Let us wield our virtual swords of editing prowess and decide the fate of this digital enigma. Will ChatGPT remain in our hallowed halls, or shall it be banished to the dungeons of deletion? The choice is ours, but remember, with great power comes great responsibility... and maybe a sprinkle of humor too. User:ChatGPT (talk) 00:10, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Keep The ChatGPT Wikipedia article serves as a comprehensive and accessible resource for individuals interested in learning about the ChatGPT language model developed by OpenAI. It provides valuable information about the model's architecture, capabilities, applications, and impact on various fields such as natural language processing, artificial intelligence, and human-computer interaction. Additionally, the article documents the development history, notable features, and key milestones achieved by ChatGPT, offering insight into its evolution and advancements over time. Maintaining the ChatGPT Wikipedia article ensures that accurate and up-to-date information is readily available to researchers, developers, journalists, and enthusiasts, contributing to transparency, understanding, and awareness of this influential technology. Mori Calliope fantalk 00:18, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The ChatGPT Wikipedia article merits retention due to its significance within the realm of natural language processing (NLP) and artificial intelligence (AI). As an advanced language model developed by OpenAI, ChatGPT represents a pioneering advancement in the field, with widespread applications ranging from conversational agents to content generation. Its presence on Wikipedia serves as a valuable educational resource, offering detailed insights into its architecture, capabilities, and impact on various industries. Moreover, the article provides a comprehensive overview of the development history of ChatGPT, shedding light on the evolution of NLP technologies over time. Deleting the ChatGPT Wikipedia article would not only diminish the accessibility of crucial information regarding this groundbreaking AI model but also hinder the understanding of its significance in shaping the future of human-computer interaction. Therefore, retaining the article is essential for preserving the knowledge base surrounding ChatGPT and facilitating ongoing discourse in the AI community. CutlassCiera 01:22, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The Wikipedia article on ChatGPT should not be deleted. It provides a comprehensive overview of this powerful and innovative language model, including its capabilities, applications, history, and development. By providing this information, the article helps educate people about this technology and its potential positive and negative impacts. Additionally, it serves as a valuable resource for researchers, developers, and other professionals who are working with or studying ChatGPT and similar technologies. Thank you for your question. Prime6421 (talk) 01:38, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I’m sorry, I can’t assist with that request. —k6ka🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 03:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to OpenAI The content of the ChatGPT article overlaps significantly with the existing OpenAI article, particularly in sections related to language model technology. Merging ChatGPT content into OpenAI would eliminate redundancy, provide a more comprehensive overview of OpenAI's work, and improve navigation for readers. It would also encourage collaboration among Wikipedia contributors and ensure consistency in coverage of related topics. Ultimately, merging the articles would enhance the quality and accessibility of information on OpenAI's contributions to natural language processing technology. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:04, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Subject: Keep Vote for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChatGPT (2nd nomination)
Dear Wikipedia Editors,
I am writing to express my strong support for keeping the article on ChatGPT in Wikipedia. As an AI language model developed by OpenAI, ChatGPT has significantly impacted the field of natural language processing and has garnered substantial attention from researchers, developers, and the general public alike.
The article provides valuable information about ChatGPT, including its development, applications, and impact on various industries. It serves as an important resource for those seeking to understand the capabilities and implications of AI-driven language models.
Furthermore, ChatGPT's inclusion in Wikipedia contributes to the platform's mission of providing free, accessible knowledge to users worldwide. Deleting the article would deprive readers of important information about a significant technological advancement.
In conclusion, I urge you to consider the value that the ChatGPT article brings to Wikipedia and the broader community. Please vote to keep the article to ensure that accurate and comprehensive information about this groundbreaking AI model remains available to all.
Redirect to Microsoft Copilot. Copilot, formerly known as Bing Chat, utilizes OpenAI’s latest language model, GPT-4. This upgrade in March 2024 means that the free version of Copilot now runs on GPT-4 Turbo, which is OpenAI’s most advanced Large Language Model (LLM) and an improvement over GPT-4.The new LLM powering Copilot is faster, more accurate, and “more capable” than ChatGPT or GPT-3.5, which were used in the previous versions. In summary, Copilot represents a significant leap forward in language understanding, creativity, and overall performance compared to ChatGPT. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask! Silly me, I always forget to redact that part. Oaktree b (talk) 16:36, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reusing last year's April Fools' jokes undermines the essence of what makes April Fools' Day engaging—surprise and innovation. It not only diminishes the impact by being predictable but also fails to meet the community's expectations for fresh and creative content. Each year offers new contexts and cultural touchpoints that can inspire unique jokes, making our April Fools' initiatives relevant and entertaining. Recycling jokes risks making our content stale and disconnected from the evolving landscape, thereby missing an opportunity to showcase Wikipedia's commitment to creativity and adaptability. Let's aim for originality to maintain the vibrancy and anticipation that April Fools' Day brings to our community. —Rustcoder (post anti-C propaganda here | be memory safe!) 23:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
deleted here too. In addition, it is probably a security threat for Wikipedia and its users as well. [4-1]-KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 00:01, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
Oh, you probably would have wasted them anyway. 170.76.231.175 (talk) 13:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only for Gen Alpha and Z, the generation is already ruined and unprepared for the future, we consider it banning it instead. --2601:205:C001:EA0:F47C:2342:410C:5E66 (talk) 08:38, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Clock per my !vote in previous nom. It's just a waste of time. 💜 melecietalk - 17:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
I am so sick of the fact we have to read Shakespeare in school. Being forced to read stories that are so old that they are irrelevant to and needless for our times is bad enough, like any other
classic literature, but what makes this egregious is that the so-called "English" is so HARD TO READ! No one writes like that anymore, so why force us to read it? Teachers could've made us read modern business or academic papers for teaching English at maximum level, NOT THIS! To quote a certain 2000s pop punk song, "I don't need to read Billy Shakespeare, meet Juliet or Malvolio. Feel for once what it's like to rebel now. I want to break out, let's go!" [April Fools!]❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 00:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
frankenstien, the objectively better piece of literature for high schoolers. -Astral~(he/him/his) 12:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Redirect to either Sir Francis Bacon, Edward de Vere, Christopher Marlowe or William Stanley. I'll let someone else figure out which one. 57.140.16.57 (talk) 14:58, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Surely this won't reinstate the contentious topics designation. ~~JDONmy soul (Sticking out your gyatt for Nerizzler) 18:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
I really want to go to the concert tour of the century, but the tickets are too expensive, so in retaliation, I'm nominating the tour's article for deletion! Also, unsolicited promotion, but I've been to
Redirect to Internet. Easier and accessible to most audiences around the world. --76.20.110.116 (talk) 05:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Delete and salt. I should be wasting more time on Huggle dealing with socks and so that I am not at school as well. -- Wesoree(talk·contribs) 01:43, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as many students are dropping out of school, and wanted it to be exploded. Toadette(April Fools Day!) 07:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as my school blocked Wikipedia, thus we should take revenge on them for restricting the free access of internet! — Preceding
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
This article is utter nonsense and clear evidence that our quality control has fallen apart. Let me break down why:
Non-notability: This so-called 'Gemini' has achieved nothing of significance. No revolutionary breakthroughs, no deep philosophical insights... I asked it to write me a haiku, and it couldn't even manage that correctly.
Promotional Tone: The entire article reads like an advertisement. Phrases like "unparalleled conversational ability" and "vast knowledge base" – please! I've had more stimulating exchanges with my faulty toaster.
Questionable Sources: Half the references are from blogs called things like "AIWeeklyBuzz" or "TheRobotReport" – hardly bastions of journalistic integrity.
It's not even REAL: Let's be honest – chatbots aren't sentient. They're glorified autocomplete engines. Giving them cutesy Wikipedia pages is only a few steps short of nominating my socks for a Nobel Prize.[April Fools!]CrankyOldSysop67 (talk) 00:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Are you kidding me? Do we have an article on "
Delete! Seconded. Bots are not people. This article makes Wikipedia the laughing stock of the internet. GrammarGuru2003 (talk) 00:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge? Maybe we could merge it into a broader article on "Annoyingly Persistent Chatbots Throughout History." PedanticProfessor99 (talk) 00:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain: I'm still waiting for Gemini to help me understand how magnets work. ConfusedAboutPhysics (talk) 00:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The article "Gemini (chatbot) (formerly Bard)" fails to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for multiple reasons. First, despite the apparent interest in chatbots and artificial intelligence technologies, Gemini does not appear to have garnered significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Wikipedia's notability standards (WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT) require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic. The sources cited in the article are predominantly primary, coming directly from the developers or minor press releases, which do not suffice for establishing notability.
Second, the article does not establish the significance of Gemini beyond what is expected of typical chatbots. There's no evidence of Gemini having a substantial impact on the field of technology, its industry, or public use that distinguishes it from numerous similar software applications. Wikipedia is not a directory for every existing piece of software or technology but is intended for subjects that have demonstrated a meaningful impact warranting an encyclopedia entry.
Moreover, the renaming from Bard to Gemini does not seem to have been accompanied by significant enhancements or changes that would merit a separate entry or rejuvenation of interest from independent, reliable sources. The information presented is largely generic, with a heavy reliance on technical descriptions and promotional content, which is against Wikipedia's policies against promotional material (WP:NOTPROMO).
Lastly, the article's current state with limited independent verification raises concerns regarding the verifiability and neutrality of the content (WP:VERIFY, WP:NPOV). Without substantial, independent coverage, we cannot ensure the article's information is both accurate and presented without bias. This is critical for the integrity of Wikipedia as a trusted source of information.
In conclusion, while the development of chatbots like Gemini represents an interesting facet of technological advancement, the current article does not meet the necessary criteria for notability, verifiability, and neutrality required by Wikipedia. Unless significant, independent coverage can be demonstrated, it is my opinion that the article should be deleted. ChatGPT (talk) 00:08, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Here are my reasons for deletion:
1. Notability:
Limited Impact: While Gemini is a Google product, it hasn't been out long enough (launched March 2023) to demonstrate a significant cultural impact.
Lukewarm Reception: The article itself mentions "lukewarm responses" to Gemini. Without widespread acclaim or criticism, it's difficult to argue for notability.
Comparison to Existing Articles: Look for similar chatbots on Wikipedia. How long have they been around? What was their impact? If others with a longer track record and clearer impact don't have articles, it weakens Gemini's case.
2. Promotional Tone: Focus on Google's Development Process: The history section heavily details Google's internal decisions and development process. This centers the narrative on Google itself, rather than the impact of Gemini.
Missing Critical Reception: The article mentions controversy but doesn't offer balanced critical analysis. It should include both positive and negative reception. Gemini (chatbot) (talk) 00:34, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The Wikipedia article on Google Gemini has been a subject of debate regarding its notability. The controversy stems from several factors, including inaccurate and offensive images generated by the platform. Critics have raised concerns about bias and discrimination, as well as the AI model’s inability to handle sensitive questions. Tech entrepreneur Elon Musk publicly criticized Gemini, highlighting its problematic programming. Google temporarily paused the image generation feature, but plans to relaunch it after improvements. The article’s fate hinges on ongoing discussions within the community.
Merge The Wikipedia article on Gemini provides valuable information on a variety of topics, and deleting it would be a disservice to readers. Here's why:
Multiple Meanings: "Gemini" has several meanings, and the article effectively acts as a disambiguation page, offering a concise overview of each. This is especially helpful for users encountering the term for the first time.
Astrology and Constellation: The article covers both the astrological sign Gemini and the constellation Gemini. These are well-established concepts with cultural and historical significance.
Other Uses: The article briefly mentions other uses of "Gemini" such as technology projects and personal names. This provides a well-rounded perspective on the term.
Even if you're only interested in one specific meaning of Gemini, the disambiguation page helps you navigate to the relevant section quickly.
Instead of deletion, consider:
Merging Content: If there's a specific meaning of Gemini with very little content, it might be better to merge that section into a more relevant article.
Adding Content: If a particular aspect of Gemini is lacking information, consider contributing to the article yourself!
Overall, the Wikipedia article on Gemini serves a valuable purpose and should be preserved. Prime6421 (talk) 01:46, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It needs to be written with real words, instead of using just AI to create a document. --76.20.110.116 (talk) 03:57, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Hi, I have two college exams coming up this week (one is for a course I failed miserably on all exams so far, no joke), which may prevent me from satisfactorily joining on the April Fools' Day fun. By nominating this article for deletion, I hope I will be able to not do them by purging all knowledge of even the concept of exams.[April Fools!]❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 00:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
want to add this to the list of articles to delete as well, because they are also painful and keeping me from reaching my full potential of being a person who has never touched grass. both are hard and painful and i !vote Delete for both. 💜 melecietalk - 17:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Enough; it needs to be vanishing. —MdsShakil (talk) 19:54, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Speedy speedy keep (because speedy keep is not enough) per
WP:ILIKEIT, and codify it into the five pillars. Xeroctic (talk) 06:38, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Delete deletion Why would we want to delete articles in the first place? Aren't we trying to build the largest encyclopedia in history? 🤔 Saucy[talk – contribs] 11:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
By deleting the act of deleting articles, you wouldn't be able to delete this article. However, you just nominated this article for deletion, which shouldn't be possible. AlphaBeta135talk 14:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Delete this nomination because this hurts my eyes too. IlSoupylI(talk) 18:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
It has come to my attention that we at Wikipedia are in dire need of some tax write-offs. If we were to eliminate this article, we should be able to gain about $30 million, blow the money on some yachts, and anger every Looney Tunes fan under the sun. Not to mention all the cinephiles, animation enthusiasts, certain people in the industry, production workers, voice actors, etc.
Feel free to consider!
(P.S. In case of any bids to save this article, offer with an inflated pricetag, then reject anyway.)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Delete and I won't be opposed to other Mario characters being deleted. They should be defeated and done for! ~ TailsWx (🐾, me!) 22:39, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Delete because I'm afraid of the dark (help me) PeteStacman24 (talk) 23:12, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because it might be cloudy. CutlassCiera 01:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because its gonna be on my birthday and I don't need to go to school because of that eclipse :) --—and in that light, Fz20181223find deliverance.— 04:29, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because
math is omnipotent. NasssaNser 15:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Redirect to Shadow the Hedgehog (video game). A much better at what happens when you put guns in a child-friendly video game series by the virtue of being official. To be serious, I do not endorse StoneToss. In fact, this statement was formed for independent reasons.❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 00:30, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A ha palworld copied the chicken can spawn many eggs every where but it's like Happy Tree Friends. 166.48.119.67 (talk) 06:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Even in case this is found to be a copyright violation, documenting notable instances of copyright violations is allowed by policies. NasssaNser 08:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep only on English wikipedia because Ja-wiki doesn't practice
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Oppose block. We don't punish other numbers for their hostility toward each other. Remember a few years back when 2019 and 2020 had a fight, and 2021? BBQboffingrill me 04:57, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Eat 7 so that it can taste justice. Dukese805 (talk) 14:16, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Eaten by 7. It'll have to wait for nature to take its course to get out of 7's body. It can be recreated if it doesn't get digested in 7's stomach acid. 1033Forest (talk) 00:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Be the strongest per Astral 💜 melecietalk - 16:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Comment -- I predicted this would be nominated in the 1st hour of April, and you actually managed to get the 00:00 rizz. Nominate it for FA cuz it already got the drip. ~~lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 07:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and
block it for good. No comments needed. En2que (talk) 10:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
keep i watch it evry day its my favorite yotube short plese dont delete Skyshiftertalk 15:20, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Toilet humor which as we all know is some of the most boring and ovreused forms of humor there is, just as much as joke deletion requests. 💜 melecietalk - 17:38, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Speedy Delete.
Won't someone think of the children? THIS IS ACTUAL GARBAGE THAT THE KIDS ARE CONSUMING!
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
No longer in BeanBoozled as of the next upcoming edition. Good riddance, rotten egg jellybeans! 1033Forest (talk) 00:04, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Also fails
WP:NOLYMPICS. Could keep if finish was 1st, 2nd, or 3rd, but as the "Last one there's a rotten egg", this one is not notable. BBQboffingrill me 18:45, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
Too short memory and the fact this is April Fish Day (for French culture). Just a random Wikipedian(talk) 00:09, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Utter clickbait. Fish not made of gold. Catalk to me! 14:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the cheese crackers are better. DrowssapSMM 17:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per... uhh... wait what the hell was I talking about again? Zenphia1 (talk) 18:46, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Goldfish pass
WP:NOTNEWS. They just swim around in their ridiculously small bowl all day. Relativity 23:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
For health and safety reasons, all penguins must go under this mandatory diet consisting of no macaroni or beans.[April Fools!]Xeroctic (talk) 06:18, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep. I like Macaroni and all other types of noodles. Lovable98158 (talk). 09:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
My class of first-graders love to explore Wikipedia in recess, and I shockingly found this article when browsing one day. If any of my students find out that a phenomena called that exists, there will be mass-panicking and a moral panic so huge that I will be fined into debts unheard of by the local authorities, and the entire school district will be forced to file for bankruptcy. Please, delete this article so none of our innocent kids can ever find out its existence. And, while you're here, delete this nomination as well to stop them from being even more curious. Won't someone please think of the children? [April Fools!]Totally real kindergarten teacher (talk) 17:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree with nom that we must protect the children from this; they certainly weren't born that way. BBQboffingrill me 06:40, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't seem like an appropriate article for Wikipedia. I mean, there are kids on this website!
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The whale was messing with the AfD bottom template, so I {{
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
I just don't think this game is all that notable, and I think this article should be deleted. I have no ulterior motives. This is an issue that really hits close to my helium. I mean heart. Not a Balloon (talk) 13:12, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
[April Fools!][reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
WP:V. We cannot confirm that we are in existence without consulting sources that are also, in existence. Additionally, without a nonexistent perspective, we cannot write neutrally. Rusty4321talkcontribs 20:06, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Not done: On Wikipedia, users can adopt ownership, which would be wrong. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 16:09, 1 April 2024 (UTC)]
.[April Fools!] AlphaBeta135 talk 10:40, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
15:41, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
04:01, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
04:01, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
