PNS Ghazi
The Tench-class submarine in the U.S. Navy's service as Diablo in 1964.
| |
History | |
---|---|
United States | |
Name | USS Diablo |
Builder | Maine, United States[1] |
Laid down | 11 August 1944[1] |
Launched | 1 December 1944[1] |
Commissioned | 31 March 1945[1] |
Decommissioned | 1 June 1964[1] |
Stricken | 4 December 1971[2] |
Identification | SS-479 |
Fate | Transferred to Pakistan on 1 June 1964[1] |
Pakistan | |
Name | PNS Ghazi |
Cost | $1.5 million |
Acquired | 1 June 1964 |
Refit | 2 April 1970 |
Homeport | Karachi Naval Base |
Identification | S-130 |
Honours and awards |
|
Fate | Lost under unknown circumstances with 93 personnel onboard on 4/5 December 1971 in Bay of Bengal in East of Indian Ocean.[3][4][5][6][7] |
General characteristics | |
Class and type | |
Displacement | |
Length | 311 ft 8 in (95.00 m)[2] |
Beam | 27 ft 4 in (8.33 m)[2] |
Draft | 17 ft (5.2 m) maximum[2] |
Propulsion | |
Speed | |
Range | 11,000 nautical miles (20,000 km; 13,000 mi) surfaced at 10 knots (19 km/h; 12 mph)[9] |
Endurance |
|
Test depth |
|
Complement |
|
Armament |
|
PNS/M Ghazi (S–130)
She served in the United States Navy from 1945 to 1963 and was loaned to Pakistan under the
In 1968 Ghazi executed a submerged circumnavigation of Africa and southern parts of Europe through the Indian Ocean to the Atlantic Ocean, due to the closure of the Suez Canal, in order to be refitted and updated at Gölcük, Turkey. The submarine could be armed with up to 28 Mk.14 torpedoes and had the capability of mine-laying added as part of her refit.[8][5]
Starting as the only submarine in the Indo-Pakistani war of 1965, Ghazi remained the Pakistan Navy's flagship submarine until she sank under mysterious circumstances near India's eastern coast while conducting naval operations en route to the Bay of Bengal.[17] While the Indian Navy credits Ghazi's sinking to its destroyer INS Rajput,[18][19][20][21][22] the Pakistani military oversights and reviews stated that "the submarine sank due to either an internal explosion or accidental detonation of mines being laid by the submarine off the Visakhapatnam harbour".[23][24][25][26][27]
In 2010, it was revealed the
Diablo, a long-range
She was the only warship of the United States Navy to be named Diablo, which means "devil" in Spanish.: 134–135 [37] The submarine's assigned and issued insignia patch identified the caricature image of the devil running with a torpedo in the sea.[38]
After being commissioned at the
From 15 January 1946 to 27 April 1949, Diablo was based in the
Diablo arrived at Naval Station Norfolk in Virginia, her new home port, on 5 June 1949, and participated in Operation Convex in 1951, and alternated training cruises with duty at the Sonar School at Key West.[1] Her homeport became New London in 1952 and she arrived there 17 September to provide training facilities for the Submarine School.[33]
From 3 May to 1 June 1954, she was attached to the Operational Development Force at Key West for tests of new weapons and equipment.[33] She participated in Operation Springboard in the Caribbean from 21 February to 28 March 1955, and continued to alternate service with the Submarine School with antisubmarine warfare and fleet exercises in the Caribbean and off Bermuda, as well as rendering services to the Fleet Sonar School and Operational Development Force at Key West.[35] Between February and April 1959, she cruised through the Panama Canal along the coasts of Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Chile for exercises with South American navies.[33] On 27 May 1960, she entered Philadelphia Naval Shipyard for an overhaul which continued until October 1960.[36]
In 1962 her hull classification symbol was changed to AGSS-479.[2]
Diablo was decommissioned on 1 June 1964 and was commissioned in the Pakistani Navy the same day.
Awards
- Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal
- World War II Victory Medal
- National Defense Service Medal with star
The procurement and acquisition of Ghazi was a result of lengthy and complicated negotiation between the administrations of Pakistan and the United States.: 57–60 [39] Since the 1950s the Pakistan Navy had been seeking to procure imported submarines, initially negotiating with the Royal Navy and subsequently also with the United States Navy.: 58 [39]
With
Ghazi was the first submarine to be operated by a Navy in
She was fitted with 14 vintage
Western Front of the Indo-Pakistani war of 1965
On 5 August 1965
Notable
- Cdr. K. R. Nyazi– Ofc–in–chrg.of Ghazi.
- Ahmed Tasnim–2nd-in-Cmd.of Ghazi
- Lt-Cdr. Habib Ahmad-Electrical Officerof Ghazi
- Navigation officerin Ghazi
- S-Lt. Fasih Bokhari–then Torpedo officer in Ghazi
She was the only submarine in the conflict arena that was deployed in the
On 17 September 1965 Ghazi made a surface contact and identified INS Brahmaputra and fired three World War II-era Mark 14 torpedoes and increased depth to evade counterattack.[8] According to submarine war logs three distinct explosions were heard at about the time when the torpedoes should have impacted but Brahmaputra was not sunk, neither had it been hit since the warship did not release depth charges nor had it detected the Sonar Emissions of the Ghazi.[8] No ships were sunk or damaged in the area and Ghazi safely reported back to base.[8]
Upon her return she won ten war awards including two decorations of Sitara-e-Jurat, one Tamgha-i-Jurat and the President's citations and six Imtiazi Sanads while her commander, Cdr. K.R. Niazi was decorated with the Sitara-e-Jurat and chief petty officers were decorated with the Tamgha-i-Jurat.[41][42] It is not known what Ghazi's target was or what the three mysterious explosions were since no inquiry report was ever submitted.[8]
After the war in 1965–66 an arms embargo was placed on both India and Pakistan, but was later waived by the United States, strictly based on the
Because of the
During her submerged circumnavigation voyage she briefly stopped at
Refitting and
Eastern Front of Indo-Pakistani war of 1971
Under the command of
In August 1971 the Indian Navy transferred INS Vikrant, its aircraft carrier, to the
Prior to her deployment Ghazi continued to experience equipment failures and reportedly had aging issues. Since it was the only submarine of the Pakistan Navy and had the range and capability to undertake operations in the distant waters controlled by India, Ghazi was pressed into operation to destroy or damage Vikrant.
Another problem faced by PNS Ghazi was the poor conditions of maintenance facilities at Chittagong port in East Pakistan.[45]
Fate
The mysterious sinking of Ghazi took place on 4 December 1971 during its hunt to find Vikrant and/or during the minelaying mission on the Visakhapatnam Port, Bay of Bengal.[44] The cause of the sinking is still unknown, and Indian and Pakistani sources have different views.
On 16 November she was in contact with the Navy NHQ and Commander Khan charted the
On 1 December 1971,
According to Indian claims at 23:40 on 3 December 1971, taking on board a pilot, INS Rajput moved through the channel to the exit from Visakhapatnam.[48][49]
At midnight, shortly after passing the entrance buoy, the starboard lookout reported a breaker on the surface of the water right on the nose. According to the Indian Navy's claims, Captain Singh changed the course at full speed across the specified point and ordered to drop two depth charges, which was done.[48] The explosions were "stunning", and Rajput suffered a serious material concussion to its structure. However, visible results of this attack are not given.[48] INS Rajput for some time surveyed the area dumping bombs, no longer found any contact — either visual or acoustic. A few minutes later the destroyer continued her way to the coast of East Pakistan (now Bangladesh).[48][49]
On the night of 4–5 December 1971, Ghazi sank with all 93 servicemen on board (11 officers and 82 enlisted[50]) under mysterious circumstances: 157 [44][51] off the Visakhapatnam coast, allowing the Indian Navy to effect a naval blockade of East Pakistan.: 157 [51]
Intelligence and deception
According to Indian DNI's director Rear-Admiral Mihir K. Roy, Ghazi's existence was revealed when a signal addressed to naval authorities in Chittagong was intercepted, requesting information on a lubrication oil only used by submarines and minesweepers.[44][52]
Indian Navy intelligence tracked Ghazi with a codename issued as
Vice Admiral Nilakanta Krishnan of the Eastern Naval Command had maintained that it was clear that Pakistan would have deployed Ghazi in the Bay of Bengal and a part of its plan was an attempt to sink the Indian aircraft carrier Vikrant.[8] At the same time concerted action was taken to disseminate misinformation designed to mislead the enemy about the true location of the aircraft carrier, and to foster confidence that the carrier was stationed at Visakhapatnam.[8][48] In particular the D 41 Rajput was instructed to move from Vishakhapatnam to Madras, sending signals as if it were the Vikrant.
All these activities were apparently successful in deceiving Ghazi when on 25 November 1971, the Navy NHQ communicated with Ghazi that stated: "Intel indicates carrier in port".[49]
Aftermath
On 26 November 1971, Ghazi was expected to communicate with the Navy NHQ to submit its mission report but did not communicate with its base.[53] The Navy NHQ repeatedly made frantic efforts to establish the communication and anxiety grew as days passed for her return to the base.[53] Before the naval hostilities broke out, commanding officers had started worrying about Ghazi's fate but the Navy NHQ senior command had replied to their junior officers that several reasons could be attributed to the failure of the submarine to communicate.[53]
On 9 December, the Indian Navy issued a statement about the fate of Ghazi. The first indication of Ghazi's fate came when a message from the Indian NHQ, claiming sinking of Ghazi on the night of 3 December, was intercepted.[53] The Indian NHQ issued the statement a few hours before the loss of INS Khukri, and prior to launch of second missile attack on Karachi port.[53]
Indian version
After the
The claim of sinking Ghazi has been the centre of controversy between the Indian authors, giving doubts in their theories of mysterious sinking of the submarine.[53] With Commodore Ranjit Roy testifying that "very loud explosion effects were heard at the beach that came from underwater."[53] Commodore Roy also concluded that "...at that time, how the Ghazi was sunk remained unclear as it does today."[53]
The official history of the Indian Navy, Transition to Triumph, authored by retired Vice-Admiral G.M. Hiranandani, gave an exhaustive account of the sinking of Ghazi. He quoted naval records and top naval officials who commanded operations on the eastern seafront as saying that INS Rajput was sent from Visakhapatnam to track down Ghazi. The book also noted that the time of dropping of the charges, the explosion which was heard by the people of Visakhapatnam and that of a clock recovered from Ghazi, matched.[55] However, Admiral Hiranandani maintained that the submarine almost certainly suffered an internal explosion but its causes are debatable.[27]
Admiral Roy of India stated: "The theories propounded earlier by some who were unaware of the ruse de guerre (attempt to fool the enemy in wartime) leading to the sinking of the first submarine in the Indian Ocean gave rise to smirks from within our own (Indian) naval service for an operation which instead merited a Bravo Zulu (flag hoist for Well Done)".[52]
Admiral
In 2003, the Indian Navy again sent its divers to overlook its investigation and the divers recovered some items including the
In 2010,
In 2010, it was reported that the Indian Navy had destroyed all records of the sinking of the submarine Ghazi.[28][29][30] Vice Admiral G. M. Hiranandani, who was tasked with writing the official history of the navy, said that he was unable to obtain any old files regarding Ghazi sinking.[59] One of the retired navy officer who saw action in 1971 said that the destruction of the Ghazi papers and those of the army in Kolkata depicts the many instances when Indian war history has been deliberately falsified. He further stated that 'We have enough heroes. In the fog of war, many myths and false heroes may have been created and many honest ones left unsung'.[6]
In 2011, former Indian naval chief, Admiral Arun Prakash quoted in the national security conference that [Ghazi] had sunk under mysterious circumstances, "not by INS Rajput as originally claimed."[60][61] Parkash later published an article in Indian media in 2021 in which he stated that PNS Ghazi sank due to an internal explosion.[62]
Pakistani military oversights
In 1972, the
It was only on 10 February 1972, when the incident was officially recognised by the
The
Pakistan never accepted the theory from the Indian Navy but provided its alternative insights into this disaster based on the investigations on the
- *hydrogen gas during the charging of the submarine's batteries that may have led to a violent internal explosion.[4]
- *Detonation of a mine inside the submarine: This was often cited by the Pakistan Navy as the World War II-era Mk.10/Mk.14 torpedoes may have deep "circular" run, failing to straighten its run once set on its prescribed gyro-angle setting, and instead, to run in a large circle, thus returning to strike the firing ship.[41][64][65][66]
Another theory from foreign experts, also favoured by Pakistan, is that the explosive shock waves from one of the depth charges set off the torpedoes and mines (some of which may have been armed for laying) stored aboard the submarine.[48][53] The Navy NHQ counter-argued: Ghazi itself may have inadvertently passed over the mines during the mine laying operations; patrolling Indian vessels or Indian depth charges might also have tripped the count mechanism of one or more mines.[53] Credibility is added to this story by the later discovery made by Indian Coast Guard divers in 2003, that the damaged parts of the submarine had been blown inside out.[48][67]
From information found in the investigation conducted on the cause of the loss of the American submarine
In addition, the NI's investigations also exposed the deployment of Ghazi when it was indicated that there was no indication that Ghazi's crew had ever practiced with mines, and most of its crew including its commanding officer were relatively new to the submarine for the magnitude of this type of deployment.[8] As opposed to the U.S. Navy service which had restricted to the personnel of 81, the Ghazi's complement was about 93, the award, Star of Courage, acknowledged that were there were 12 extra personnel aboard the boat at the time of its sinking.[69] An increase in the sub's total complement would put a strain on the logistical capabilities of a patrol because it reduces its duration.
In 2006, Pakistan, citing their evidences, rejected India's claim of sinking Ghazi and termed the claims as "false and utterly absurd".[3]
Neutral witnesses and assessments
An independent testimony stems from an Egyptian naval officer who was at that time serving on an Egyptian submarine which was undergoing refit in the harbour. He has confirmed the occurrence of a powerful explosion in the vicinity of the harbor late at night. There were no naval ships, as reported by this officer, outside the harbor at that time and it was not until about an hour after the explosion that two Indian naval ships were observed leaving harbor.[70][71]
Some independent writers and investigators maintained Ghazi was sunk mysteriously not by two depth charges alone, Ghazi may have sunk either by the hydrogen explosion produced when the batteries were charging, or by the detonation of a mine, or either by the sea floor impact while trying to avoid the depth charge released by INS Rajput.[8][27][4]
In 2012, Pakistani
Recovery of sunken vessel
In 1972, both the United States and the Soviet Union offered to raise the submarine to the surface at their expense.[52] The Government of India, however, rejected these offers and allowed the submarine to sink further into the mud off the fairway buoy of Visakhapatnam.[52]
In 2003, Indian Navy
In 2003, additional photos were released by the Indian Navy of the vessel.[27]
Legacy
In memory
In 1972, Ghazi and her serving officers as well as crew members were honoured with
At the Naval Dockyard in Karachi, a 'Ghazi Monument' was built to perpetuate the memory of the submarine and its 93 men.[69] In 1974, the naval base, PNS Zafar, was commissioned and constructed in the memory of Commander Zafar Muhammad Khan that now serves as the headquarter for Northern Naval Command.[69] In 1975, the Navy acquired the Albacora-class submarine from the Portuguese Navy and named it Ghazi (S-134), in memory of PNS Ghazi.[75]
Her loss to the Pakistan Navy through an accident was a watershed and a significant event, leading the Navy's engineering to the implementation of a rigorous submarine safety programme.[53]
In 1998, the
In 2016,
Notable commanders
- Commander Gordon Graham Matheson–U.S. Navy officer and her first commanding officer, commanded from 1945–1946.[78]
- Commander four-starrank admiral, commanded from 1964–66.
- Commander Hangor'scommander in 1971 and later Vice-Admiral, commanded Ghazi from 1966–1969.
- Lieutenant Commander Yousaf Raza– commanded Ghazi from 1969–1971
- Commander Zafar Muhammad– the last commander until her sinking in 1971.
Honours and awards
Sitara-e-Jurat (Awarded in 1965 and 1971) |
President's Citation (Citation in 1965) |
Tamgha-i-Jurat (Awarded in 1965) |
Sword of Honour (Awarded in 1965) |
In popular culture
- Ghazi Shaheed , a 1996 Pakistani film describing the submarine's journey.
- Ghazi, a 2017 Indian film based on sinking of PNS Ghazi.[79]
- Raazi a 2018 Indian spy thriller film directed by Meghna Gulzar about the Indian spy mission that provided intelligence about PNS Ghazi's mission to attack INS Vikrant[80]
See also
- Pakistan Navy Submarine Command
- PNS Hangor
- Soviet submarine K-129 (1960), which sank on 8 March 1968 in the Pacific Ocean under mysterious circumstances
References
- ^ ISBN 1-55750-263-3.
- ^ ISBN 0-313-26202-0.
- ^ a b Staff writer (24 December 2006). "India did not sink Ghazi: Pak commander – Times of India". The Times of India. Times of India, 2006. Times of India. Archived from the original on 4 April 2017. Retrieved 22 November 2016.
- ^ a b c d e Khan, Commander Azam. "Maritime Awareness and Pakistan Navy". www.defencejournal.com. Defence Journal, Azam. Archived from the original on 9 March 2016. Retrieved 20 November 2016.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Tasnim, Vice-Admiral Ahmed (May 2001). "Remembering Our Warriors – Vice Admiral Tasneem". www.defencejournal.com. Vice Admiral A. Tasnim, Defence Journal. Archived from the original on 10 May 2017. Retrieved 17 November 2016.
- ^ a b c "Now no record of navy sinking Pakistani submarine in 1971". Times of India. Retrieved 12 May 2010.
- ^ a b Shabbir, Usman. "List of Gallantry Awardees – PN Officers/CPOs/Sailors « PakDef Military Consortium". pakdef.org. Archived from the original on 10 August 2017. Retrieved 20 November 2016.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa wwiiafterwwii (24 December 2015). "Last voyage of PNS Ghazi 1971". wwiiafterwwii. Archived from the original on 19 November 2016. Retrieved 18 November 2016.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j U.S. Submarines Through 1945 pp. 305–311
- ^ ISBN 978-0-313-26202-9.
- ^ U.S. Submarines Through 1945 pp. 261–263
- ^ U.S. Submarines Through 1945 pp. 305–311
- ^ "PNS/M Ghazi: Officers and Enlisted". pakdef.org. Archived from the original on 7 September 2018. Retrieved 7 September 2018.
- ^ Shabbir, Uman. "PNS/M Ghazi (S-130)". PakDef Military Consortium. Archived from the original on 7 September 2018. Retrieved 22 December 2018.
- ISBN 9781897829233. Retrieved 18 November 2016.
- ^ ISBN 9781897829721. Retrieved 18 November 2016.
- ISBN 0-7146-8436-8. Retrieved 28 May 2010.
- ^ "DAMAGE ASSESMENT [sic] - 1971 INDO-PAK NAVAL WAR" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 May 2010. Retrieved 20 June 2010.
- ^ "Rediff On The NeT: End of an era: INS Vikrant's final farewell". Rediff.com. Archived from the original on 7 January 2012. Retrieved 16 December 2011.
- ^ "The Sunday Tribune – Spectrum – Lead Article". Tribuneindia.com. Archived from the original on 16 January 2012. Retrieved 16 December 2011.
- ^ "Visakhapatnam: Sunk Pakistani submarine Ghazi is an enigma". 24 November 2015. Archived from the original on 18 February 2016. Retrieved 12 February 2016.
- ^ Bhattacharjee, Sumit (25 January 2016). "From a small outpost to a major command". The Hindu – via www.thehindu.com.
- ^ Seapower: A Guide for the Twenty-first Century By Geoffrey Till
- ^ Johnson, Ken. "PNS Ghazi" (PDF). Hooter Hilites (December 2007): 6. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 23 January 2015.
- ^ Joseph, Josy (12 May 2010). "Now, no record of Navy sinking Pakistani submarine in 1971". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 11 August 2011. Retrieved 28 May 2010.
Pakistani authorities say the submarine sank because of either an internal explosion or accidental blast of mines that the submarine itself was laying around Vizag harbour.
- ^ "The truth behind the Navy's 'sinking' of Ghazi". Sify News website. 25 May 2010. Archived from the original on 28 May 2010. Retrieved 29 May 2010.
After the war, however, teams of divers confirmed that it was an internal explosion that sank the Ghazi.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Unnithan, Sandeep (26 January 2004). "New pictures of 1971 war Pak submarine Ghazi renew debate on cause behind blast on vessel". India Today, 2003. India Today. Archived from the original on 19 June 2017. Retrieved 18 November 2016.
- ^ a b Warriors of the waves - Express Tribune
- ^ a b Real story of submarine PNS Ghazi and the mystery behind its sinking - Economic Times
- ^ a b c The Ghazi Attack: Why did India destroy records of one of its greatest naval victories - Indian Defence News
- ^ "What happened to the Pakistani submarine that inspired the movie 'The Ghazi Attack'?". Archived from the original on 27 January 2017. Retrieved 27 January 2017. Initially made in Telugu and later due to good box office performance this movie was dubbed in several other Indian languages.
- ISBN 978-1-136-25555-7.
- ^ a b c d "USS DIABLO (SS-479) Deployments & History". Hull Number. Archived from the original on 20 November 2016. Retrieved 20 November 2016.
- ^ "Diablo (SS-479) of the US Navy - American Submarine of the Tench class - Allied Warships of WWII - uboat.net". uboat.net. Archived from the original on 20 August 2010. Retrieved 20 November 2016.
- ^ a b c "TogetherWeServed – Connecting US Navy Sailors". navy.togetherweserved.com. TogetherWeServed -. Archived from the original on 20 November 2016. Retrieved 20 November 2016.
- ^ a b c "USS Diablo SS-497". www.historycentral.com. USS Diablo SS-497. Archived from the original on 20 November 2016. Retrieved 20 November 2016.
- ^ ISBN 9788172110826. Retrieved 20 November 2016.
- ^ Smolinski, Mike. "Patches of USS Diablo at the Submarine Photo Index". www.navsource.org. Submarine Photo Index. Archived from the original on 9 November 2016. Retrieved 20 November 2016.
- ^ ISBN 9781897829028. Retrieved 19 November 2016.
- ISBN 9781317459552. Retrieved 19 November 2016.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Usman, Tariq. "The Ghazi That Defied The Indian Navy «". pakdef.org. PakDef Military Consortium. Archived from the original on 8 March 2017. Retrieved 19 November 2016.
- ^ ISBN 9789351940999. Retrieved 19 November 2016.
- ISBN 978-1-897829-11-0. Retrieved 8 November 2011.
- ^ ISBN 0-7146-8436-8. Retrieved 2010-05-28.
- ^ "Real story of submarine PNS Ghazi and the mystery behind its sinking - Looking back".
- ^ ISBN 9780807080467. Retrieved 20 November 2016.
- ISBN 9789386141668. Retrieved 20 November 2016.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i "Bharat Rakshak Monitor: Volume 4(2) September–October 2001". Bharat-rakshak.com. Archived from the original on 28 November 2011. Retrieved 16 December 2011.
- ^ a b c "Войны, история, факты. Альманах". Almanacwhf.ru. Archived from the original on 1 February 2012. Retrieved 16 December 2011.
- ^ "PNS/M Ghazi : Officers and Enlisted". pakdef.org. Archived from the original on 7 September 2018. Retrieved 7 September 2018.
- ^ ISBN 9780714655420. Retrieved 20 November 2016.
- ^ ISBN 978-1-897829-11-0
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Shabbir, Usman. "Operations in the Bay of Bengal: The Loss of PNS/M Ghazi« PakDef Military Consortium". pakdef.org. Usman Shabbir, loss of Ghazi. Archived from the original on 20 February 2017. Retrieved 22 November 2016.
- ^ "Victory at Sea memorial at Vizag". Archived from the original on 20 April 2010.
- ISBN 1-897829-72-8
- ^ Sengupta, Ramananda (22 January 2007). "The Rediff Interview/Admiral S M Nanda (retd) 'Does the US want war with India?'". Interview. India: Rediff. Archived from the original on 25 October 2010. Retrieved 26 March 2010.
- ^ Trilochan Singh Trewn (21 July 2002). "Naval museums give glimpse of maritime history". The Tribune. Archived from the original on 30 September 2007. Retrieved 16 May 2007.
- ^ a b c Mulki, Muhammad Abid (27 May 2012). "Warriors of the waves". The Express Tribune. Pakistan: The Express Tribune. Archived from the original on 24 November 2016. Retrieved 23 November 2016.
- ^ "Now, no record of Navy sinking Pakistani submarine in 1971 | India News - Times of India". The Times of India. 12 May 2010.
- ^ "Ghazi sank due to internal explosion: Ex-Navy Chief". News X. News X. 14 September 2011. Archived from the original on 18 June 2016. Retrieved 23 November 2016.
- ^ In 1971 war, Pak Sub sunk for ‘unknown reasons’: Ex-Navy chief - Indian Express
- ^ From Karachi To Bay of Bengal, How the Indian Navy Played a Stellar Role in the 1971 War - The Wire
- ^ "Hamoodur Rahman Commission Report" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2012. Retrieved 19 July 2013.
- ^ The event was visualized in telefilm, Ghazi Shaheed in 1998 during the climax of its script.
- ^ Transition to triumph: history of the Indian Navy, 1965–1975 By G. M. Hiranandani
- ^ ISBN 0-684-87213-7.
- ^ a b c Shabbir, Usman. "Their Name Liveth for Ever More « PakDef Military Consortium". pakdef.org. Usman Shabbir, PakDef. Archived from the original on 11 September 2018. Retrieved 20 November 2016.
- ^ Sankalp Reddy’s ‘The Ghazi Attack’: Things to know about the India-Pak underwater war - Indian Express
- ^ Johnson, Ken. "PNS Ghazi" (PDF). Hooter Hilites (December 2007): 6. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 23 January 2015.
- ^ "The Ghazi Attack: All you need to know about PNS Ghazi".
- ^ Lodhi, Lieutenant-General S.F.S. (January 2000). "An Agosta Submarine for Pakistan". www.defencejournal.com. Defence Journal, General Lodhi. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 22 November 2016.
- ^ See Albacora-class submarine
- ^ "Ghazi Shaheed". Ptv Classics. 13 November 2015. Archived from the original on 23 August 2018. Retrieved 20 November 2016.
- ^ Oversight PNS Zafar
- ^ "Lt.Cdr. Gordon Graham Matheson of the US Navy (USN) - Allied Warship Commanders of WWII - uboat.net". uboat.net.
- ^ Latha Srinivasan (7 January 2016). "Rana Daggubati on India's first Navy film 'Ghazi' and changes in the film industry". Archived from the original on 22 April 2016. Retrieved 3 May 2018.
- ^ "Is Alia Bhatt's Raazi an unofficial prequel to Rana Daggubati's The Ghazi Attack? Here's why we think so". 15 May 2018.
This article incorporates text from the public domain Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships. The entry can be found here.