Organism

Edit links
This is a good article. Click here for more information.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
(Redirected from
Organisms
)

An organism is defined in a medical dictionary as any

siphonophore, a jelly-like marine animal, is composed of organism-like zooids, but the whole structure looks and functions much like an animal such as a jellyfish
, the parts collaborating to provide the functions of the colonial organism.

The evolutionary biologists David Queller and Joan Strassmann state that "organismality", the qualities or attributes that define an entity as an organism, has evolved socially as groups of simpler units (from cells upwards) came to cooperate without conflicts. They propose that cooperation should be used as the "defining trait" of an organism. This would treat many types of collaboration, including the fungus/alga partnership of different species in a lichen, or the permanent sexual partnership of an anglerfish, as an organism.

Etymology

The term "organism" (from the Ancient Greek ὀργανισμός, derived from órganon, meaning instrument, implement, tool, organ of sense or apprehension)[2][3] first appeared in the English language in the 1660s with the now-obsolete meaning of an organic structure or organization.[3] It is related to the verb "organize".[3] In his 1790 Critique of Judgment, Immanuel Kant defined an organism as "both an organized and a self-organizing being".[4][5]

Whether criteria exist, or are needed

One criterion proposes that an organism cannot be divided without losing functionality.[6] This basil plant cutting is however developing new adventitious roots from a small bit of stem, forming a new plant.

Among the criteria that have been proposed for being an organism are:

  • autonomous reproduction, growth, and metabolism[7]
  • noncompartmentability – structure cannot be divided without losing functionality.[6] Richard Dawkins stated this as "the quality of being sufficiently heterogeneous in form to be rendered non-functional if cut in half".[8] However, many organisms can be cut into pieces which then grow into whole organisms.[8]
  • individuality – the entity has simultaneous holding of genetic uniqueness, genetic homogeneity and autonomy[9]
  • an immune response, separating self from foreign[10]
  • "anti-entropy", the ability to maintain order, a concept first proposed by Erwin Schrödinger;[11] or in another form, that Claude Shannon's information theory can be used to identify organisms as capable of self-maintaining their information content[12]

Other scientists think that the concept of the organism is inadequate in biology;[13] that the concept of individuality is problematic;[14] and from a philosophical point of view, question whether such a definition is necessary.[15][16][8]

Problematic cases include

eusocial insects fulfills criteria such as adaptive organisation and germ-soma specialisation.[17] If so, the same argument, or a criterion of high co-operation and low conflict, would include some mutualistic (e.g. lichens) and sexual partnerships (e.g. anglerfish) as organisms.[18] If group selection occurs, then a group could be viewed as a superorganism, optimized by group adaptation.[19]

Another view is that attributes like autonomy, genetic homogeneity and genetic uniqueness should be examined separately rather than demanding that an organism should have all of them; if so, there are multiple dimensions to biological individuality, resulting in several types of organism.[20]

Organisms at differing levels of biological organisation

fungi, with unicellular algae or cyanobacteria (green) interspersed within the structure, and a bacterial microbiome. The species are mutually interdependent, like cells within a multicellular organism.[21]

A

bacterium, or archaean, composed of a single cell, which may contain functional structures called organelles.[22]

A

alga is composed of many cells, often specialised.[22]

A

siphonophore is a being which functions as an individual but is composed of communicating individuals.[8]

A

social unit.[23][17]

A mutualism is a partnership of two or more species which each provide some of the needs of the other. A lichen consists of fungi and algae or cyanobacteria, with a bacterial microbiome; together, they are able to flourish as a kind of organism, the components having different functions, in habitats such as dry rocks where neither could grow alone.[18][21]

The evolutionary biologists David Queller and Joan Strassmann state that "organismality" has evolved socially, as groups of simpler units (from cells upwards) came to cooperate without conflicts. They propose that cooperation should be used as the "defining trait" of an organism.[18]

Queller and Strassmann's view of organisms as cooperating entities at differing levels of biological organisation[18]
Level Example Composition Metabolism,
growth,
reproduction		 Co-operation
Virus Tobacco mosaic virus Nucleic acid, protein No No metabolism, so not living, not an organism, say many biologists;[7] but they evolve, their genes collaborating to manipulate the host[18]
Unicellular organism Paramecium One cell, with organelles e.g. cilia for specific functions Yes Inter-cellular (inter-organismal) signalling[22]
Swarming protistan Dictyostelium (cellular slime mould) Unicellular amoebae Yes Free-living unicellular amoebae for most of lifetime; swarm and aggregate to a multicellular slug, cells specialising to form a dead stalk and a fruiting body[18]
Multicellular organism Mushroom-forming fungus Cells, grouped into organs for specific functions (e.g. reproduction) Yes Cell specialisation, communication[22]
Permanent sexual partnership Anglerfish Male and female permanently fastened together Yes Male provides male gametes; female provides all other functions[18]
Mutualism Lichen Organisms of different species Yes Fungus provides structure, absorbs water and minerals; alga photosynthesises[18]
Joined colony
Siphonophore
 Zooids joined together Yes Organism specialisation; inter-organism signalling[8]
Superorganism Ant colony Individuals living together Yes Organism specialisation (many ants do not reproduce); inter-organism signalling[23]

Samuel Díaz‐Muñoz and colleagues (2016) accept Queller and Strassmann's view that organismality can be measured wholly by degrees of cooperation and of conflict. They state that this situates organisms in evolutionary time, so that organismality is context dependent. They suggest that highly integrated life forms, which are not context dependent, may evolve through context-dependent stages towards complete unification.[24]

Boundary cases: viruses

Main article: Virus
A virus such as tobacco mosaic virus is not a cell; it contains only its genetic material, and a protein coat.

Viruses are not typically considered to be organisms, because they are incapable of autonomous reproduction, growth, metabolism, or homeostasis. Although viruses have a few enzymes and molecules like those in living organisms, they have no metabolism of their own; they cannot synthesize the organic compounds from which they are formed. In this sense, they are similar to inanimate matter.[7] Viruses have their own genes, and they evolve. Thus, an argument that viruses should be classed as living organisms is their ability to undergo evolution and replicate through self-assembly. However, some scientists argue that viruses neither evolve nor self-reproduce. Instead, viruses are evolved by their host cells, meaning that there was co-evolution of viruses and host cells. If host cells did not exist, viral evolution would be impossible. As for reproduction, viruses rely on hosts' machinery to replicate. The discovery of viruses with genes coding for energy metabolism and protein synthesis fuelled the debate about whether viruses are living organisms, but the genes have a cellular origin. Most likely, they were acquired through horizontal gene transfer from viral hosts.[7]

Radosław Piast compares viruses to cellular organisms. He comments that whereas in 1983, Claudiu Bandea claimed that a virus "shows the major physiological properties of other organisms: metabolism, growth, and reproduction. Therefore, life is an effective presence",[12][25] viruses do not possess these capabilities but rely exclusively on their hosts for all such cellular processes.[12]

Radosław Piast's comparison of cellular organisms and viruses[12]
Capability Cellular organism Virus
Metabolism Yes No, rely entirely on host cell
Growth Yes No, just self-assembly
Reproduction Yes No, rely entirely on host cell
Store
genetic information
about themselves		 DNA DNA or RNA
Able to evolve
recombination, natural selection
 Yes: high mutation rate, natural selection

Boundary cases: organism-like colonies

Apolemia, a colonial siphonophore that functions as a single individual

The philosopher Jack A. Wilson examines some boundary cases to demonstrate that the concept of organism is not sharply defined.[8] In his view, sponges, lichens, siphonophores, slime moulds, and eusocial colonies such as of ants or naked molerats, all lie in the boundary zone between being definite colonies and definite organisms (or superorganisms).[8]

Jack A. Wilson's analysis of the similar organism-like nature of siphonophores and jellyfish[8]
Function Colonial siphonophore Jellyfish
Buoyancy Top of colony is gas-filled Jelly
Propulsion Nectophores co-ordinate to pump water Body pulsates to pump water
Feeding
Palpons and gastrozooids
ingest prey, feed other zooids		 Tentacles trap prey, pass it to mouth
Functional structure Single functional individual Single functional individual
Composition Many zooids, possibly individuals Many cells

Boundary cases: synthetic organisms

Insect cyborg

Scientists and bio-engineers are experimenting with different types of synthetic organism, from chimaeras composed of cells from two or more species, cyborgs including electromechanical limbs, hybrots containing both electronic and biological elements, and other combinations of systems that have variously evolved and been designed.[26]

An evolved organism takes its form by the partially understood mechanisms of evolutionary developmental biology, in which the genome directs an elaborated series of interactions to produce successively more elaborate structures. The existence of chimaeras and hybrids demonstrates that these mechanisms are "intelligently" robust in the face of radically altered circumstances at all levels from molecular to organismal.[26]

Synthetic organisms already take diverse forms, and their diversity will increase. What they all have in common is a teleonomic or goal-seeking behaviour that enables them to correct errors of many kinds so as to achieve whatever result they are designed for. Such behaviour is reminiscent of intelligent action by organisms; intelligence is seen as an embodied form of cognition.[26]

References

  1. ISBN 978-0-3232-2205-1
    .
  2. Perseus Project
  3. ^ a b c "organism (n.)". Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved 11 April 2024.
  4. ^ Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Judgment: §65, 5:374.
  5. JSTOR 26370801
    .
  6. ^
    ISSN 0007-4985
    .
  7. ^
    S2CID 3907750
    .
  8. ^
    S2CID 84168536
    .
  9. PMID 10322523
    .
  10. PMID 21162370
    .
  11. ISSN 0218-3390
    .
  12. ^
    S2CID 80625250
    .
  13. S2CID 26656790
    .
  14. S2CID 28501709
    .
  15. S2CID 4942890
    .
  16. ^ Wilson, R. (2007). "The biological notion of individual". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  17. ^
    S2CID 19816447.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link
    )
  18. ^
    PMID 19805423
    .
  19. S2CID 8413751
    .
  20. PMID 10322523
    .
  21. ^
    ISSN 1560-2745
    .
  22. ^
    ISBN 978-0-19-920462-5
    .
  23. ^
    ISBN 978-0-201-48340-6
    .
  24. PMID 27704542
    .
  25. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(83)90221-7
    .
  26. ^
    ISSN 0024-4066
    .

External links
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Organism&oldid=1219543649"