User talk:Khanassassin/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Welcome to the 2012 WikiCup

Hello, and welcome to the 2012 WikiCup! The competition officially began at the start of 2012 (UTC), and so you are free to claim any content from after that time. Your submission page, where you must note any content for which you wish to claim points, can be found here, and formatting instructions can be found in hidden comments on the page. A bot will then update the main table, which can be seen on the WikiCup page. The full rules for what will and will not be awarded points can be found at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. There's also a section on that page listing the changes that have been made to the rules this year, so that experienced participants can get up-to-date in a few seconds. One point of which we must remind everyone; you may only claim points for content upon which you have done significant work, and which you have nominated, in 2012. For instance, articles written or good article reviews started in 2011 are not eligible for points. This round will last until late February, and signups will remain open until the middle of February. If you know of anyone who may like to take part, please let them know about the comeptition; the more the merrier! At the end of this round, the top 64 scorers will progress to the next round, where their scores will reset, and they will be split into pools. Note that, by default, you have been added to our newsletter list; we will be in contact at the end of every month with news. You're welcome to remove yourself from this list if you do not wish to hear from us. Conversely, those interested in following the competition are more than welcome to add themselves to the list. Please direct any questions towards the judges, or on the WikiCup talk page. Good luck! J Milburn (talk) and The ed17 (talk) 03:24, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Broken Sword 2

Responded on my talk page. Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 03:41, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Your

GA nomination of Broken Sword II: The Smoking Mirror

The article

good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Broken Sword II: The Smoking Mirror for things which need to be addressed.. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk

) 11:14, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Khanassassin. You have new messages at Talk:Broken Sword II: The Smoking Mirror/GA1.
Message added 00:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Updating Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2012

It's entirely bot-automated, so you don't have to update it manually. I guess you can if you want, but in general people don't. Thanks, - Jarry1250 ^{[Deliberation needed]} 17:48, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Khanassassin. You have new messages at Talk:Broken Sword: The Sleeping Dragon/GA1.
Message added 00:21, 9 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your

GA nomination of Broken Sword: The Sleeping Dragon

The article

review a nominated article

yourself?

Congratulations Mr Assassin. Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 03:46, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you both! --Khanassassin (talk) 09:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Angel of Death

hello,

I am sadly not a great copyeditor due to my lack of specific English skills needed to write good prose. You could ask someone another who is interested in video games and who can write in good English. If I were you, I would write the plot myself and upon completion ask an English-speaker to copyedit it. You could later request a copyedit at

_T^C_N

12:21, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Failing the GANs

As I get it, this and this edits were supposed to indicated that you fail the GAN of League of Legends. If so, you should know, that the proper way to fail GAN is to change {{GA nominee}} to {{FailedGA}} on its talk page (eg. my edit on the same article). If I was wrong on your intent, please revert the my linked edit. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 13:09, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

I would also note, that you are supposed to leave recommendations on further development of the article to provide the editors with a path to further improvements. Just marking the criteria as failing is not enough. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 13:15, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

It didn't look good when I mentioned this to you earlier and you deleted my comment without responding. From your contribs, it seems that you never use edit summaries, which can lead to confusion. Some guy (talk) 13:30, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Re:Broken Sword II

Hey there. Glad to see you made an account! And yeah, I'll see what I can do with Smoking Mirror's plot section. It's in really bad shape, but at least it's not worse than the last one. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 10:15, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

• It may take me awhile to finish on Fate of Atlantis, but I'd definitely be up for a collaboration on The Curse of Monkey Island after I'm done. It's one of my favorite games, and its article is in sad shape. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 09:34, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Heh. I've thought about it before, but I just don't edit enough for it to be worth participating. I put up 1 FA and maybe 2 GAs a year on average--maybe less. Good luck, though. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 20:40, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
    • Nice work! And thanks. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 19:49, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
      • Hey. I've only played the first two Broken Sword games; the 3D ones never caught my eye. As a result, I wouldn't be much help on Angel of Death. Sorry. 23:39, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
        • I might just do that--I got it cheap in a promotion with the other two. Anyway, sorry again for not being able to help with Angel of Death. Good luck. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 07:31, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Your signature

Hey; could you please remove the image from your signature? They are not permitted, as per

Wikipedia:SIG#Images, they are not permitted. As an alternative, if you really want one, you may consider using a text star with a link. Special characters like that are permitted. J Milburn (talk

) 22:16, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Broken Sword: The Shadow of the Templars

I'll see what I can do. Broken Sword is a great game; I'm glad to see someone working on its article. I'm preparing to work on Indiana Jones and the Fate of Atlantis as well, but I'll try to do some work on Broken Sword's Plot section. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 22:56, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

• I managed to condense the section a bit. My schedule is packed right now, so I won't have time to do a copyediting pass; but I hope I helped. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 21:40, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank You, yes you have!

The Video game Barnstar

---

For writing high-quality articles and lightning-fast response to the criticism. Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 08:59, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Nice! One of my favourite games of all time is now a GA!

_T^C_N

14:30, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Hey, this is great news. Nice work. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 01:23, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

I can look at the article for a peer review, but it will take me several days. Thanks, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 04:11, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

I will do what I said I would, but your article is about third in line in my queue. Several days may mean a week. Sorry for the delay, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 19:32, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

I would merge the unique information from Setting and characters to another section, presumably the two plot sections. I did not check all the material in the Setting and characters section, but every character and place I checked was mentioned again in the plot sections. I think the modern day time period was not, but that sentence / information could easily be moved elsewhere. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 12:49, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

PS If the info is already in the plot section, I see no need to have it as part of a separate Setting and characters section. I think a hat link to the list of charaters article is fine, and I can see a few sentences at the top of the Synopsis section that briefly describe the two main characters (Stobbart and Nico) and also make it clear to the reader what the differences are between the two versions of the game. I picked a "character" from later in the list at random, "The Hendersons". They are not mentioned again in the article (at least using that name), and they do not appear to be listed in the

List of Broken Sword characters. So what use is the information and link? As a reader who does not know the game, my understanding of it is not increased by learning that some charater(s) named "The Hendersons" appear in this game. Ruhrfisch _><>°^°

13:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

It looks better. Here's my take on the Hendersons - I know nothing of this game except for what I have read here. A grocery list of characters does not help me to better understand the game, even if all the characters is the list are linked. Here's the real problem - if I follow the link it tells me almost nothing more about these characters. For "The Hendersons", I do not find them under that name in the list of characters article, and even if I had searched for "Henderson" instead, there is no information on them except their names and the games in the series they appear in. Are they husband and wife? Parent and child? Brother and sister? And, more importantly, what is their role in this game and why are they mentioned at all in the article on this game? And yes, I see they are no longer in the article. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 13:46, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Yes I am done with my review. The language needs work and I think the plot section could be made more concise. If you get those taken care of and want me to take a second look, please ping me then, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 13:52, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

If you are going to ask me to do something (like archive a PR) and then do it yourself, what's the point? ;-) Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 14:04, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

No problem - I just went there, tried to archive it and had an edit conflict. Did you archive the PR notice on the article's talk page? Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 14:18, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Edin Osmanović

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs

) 14:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Slovenia

Welcome, Khanassassin, to the

talk page. If you create new articles on Slovenia-related topics, please list them at our announcement page and tag their talk page with our project template {{WikiProject Slovenia

}}. A few features that you might find helpful:

• The project's Navigation box points to most of the pages in the project that might be of use to you.
• Most of the important discussions related to the project take place on the project's main talk page; you may find it useful to watchlist it.

Here are some tasks you can do (watch):

• Requests:
  Protestant Reformation in the Slovene Lands (sl), Metlika black (sl)
• Wikify

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me or any of the more experienced members of the project, and we'll be very happy to help you. Again, welcome, and thank you for joining this project! --

There is something of a problem with the question of whether your good article reviews are eligible for points; they are very short, which is explicitly mentioned in the rules, and points raised seem to frequently be challenged, which raises the question of their accuracy (note that, at this time, I have no opinion on the second issue). Talk:Donkey Kong Country Returns/GA1 is just a rubber-stamping, Talk:League of Legends/GA1 is explicitly a quick-fail, Talk:Call of Duty 2/GA2 makes two recommendations which turn out to be unwarranted and Talk:Warcraft II: Tides of Darkness/GA3 makes a single, simple suggestion, and is then closed when no one carries it out. I'm afraid I don't see any of these as eligible for WikiCup points: Good article reviews are explicitly something that will be judged particularly closely, as per the rules. As such, I have removed all four from your submissions page. This should not affect your chances of getting into the next round, due to your good articles. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me on my talk page. Thanks, J Milburn (talk) 23:00, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello, following a review of

• Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including
  Igloo
  , some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
• Rollback is only for blatant
  vandalism
• Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
• Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
• Please read
  Wikipedia:Rollback feature
  to get to know the workings of the feature
• You can test Rollback at
  Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
• You can display the {{
  Rollback
  }} top icon on your user page

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:10, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

hello,

no, sorry. I just don't have interest in video games at the moment. I am also generally busy in real life, but I might join your project some day. Regards.--

Round 1 is already over! The 64 highest scorers have progressed to round 2. Our highest scorer was Grapple X (submissions), again thanks mostly to a swathe of good articles on The X-Files. In second place was Tigerboy1966 (submissions), thanks an impressive list of did you knows about racehorses. Both scored over 400 points. Following behind with over 300 points were Ruby2010 (submissions), Cwmhiraeth (submissions), Miyagawa (submissions) and Casliber (submissions). February also saw the competition's first featured list: List of colleges and universities in North Dakota, from Ruby2010 (submissions). At the other end of the scale, 11 points was enough to secure a place in this round, and some contestants with 10 points made it into the round on a tiebreaker. This is higher than the 8 points that were needed last year, but lower than the 20 points required the year before. The number of points required to progress to round 3 will be significantly higher.

The remaining contestants have been split into 8 pools of 8, named A through H. Round two will finish in two months time on 28 April, when the two highest scorers in each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers, will progress to round 3. The pools were entirely random, so while some pools may end up being more competitive than others, this is by chance rather than design.

The judges would like to point out two quick rules reminders. First, any content promoted during the interim period (that is, on or after 27 February) is eligible for points in round 2. Second, any content worked on significantly this year is eligible for points if promoted in this round. On a related note, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on

Looking at the FAC page, it seems like the main issue people have relates to comprehensiveness. Only Ruhr mentioned the plot section and prose. I think you should first focus on expanding the article--particularly the Reception section. The online print archive has a few reviews for the original Broken Sword: Computer Games Magazine, Next Generation Magazine, Computer Gaming World and PC Gamer (which is already in the article). If you can get the Reception expanded, that should take care of most of the opposition. If the writing is still an issue after that, hit me up again and I'll copyedit the article. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 21:10, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

• At FAC, people aren't that interested in scores. In one of my past FAs, I didn't even add a list of scores. The reviewers are looking for a lot of prose coverage. Super Meat Boy is a good example of the standard size of FA Reception sections. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 22:09, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Yes, much better. Be sure to tell the reviewers on the FAC page, or your nomination could get prematurely archived. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 20:01, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
    • Not sure what you mean by vote. Do you mean reviewing the article for A-Class? JimmyBlackwing (talk) 21:08, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
      • Ah. Sorry, but I'm not going to have time to edit Wikipedia for awhile--hence my recent inactivity. If it's still up for A-Class by the time I get back to editing, I'll review it for you. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 01:04, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
        • It's a big job and I'm still pretty busy, but I'll see if I can work through it. Don't expect me to be done in time for this FAC, though; there's just too much work to do. A copyediting job this serious takes me a few weeks even when I'm devoting my full attention to it. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 18:27, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the corrections and learning me how to do this stuff. Much better now after your work :-)) Hope I may consult you in the future if needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gamnos (talk • contribs) 14:21, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

I have added some lines to the bio, as suggested. Hope I did that ok (but you will spot it when I made mistakes :-)). No idea yet how I have to add a bio box etc. When you have some spare time, perhaps you can help me out (again, sorry), as you are an expert on this. Otherwise I have to do some serious studying. Best GN — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gamnos (talk • contribs) 22:12, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for all your work and help, looks much better again :-) I feel I am back in school, getting free Wiki lessons from you. Hard stuff! (Will clean up some of my typos). I am thinking too about adding some info about Ince, what do you think? Gamnos (talk) 09:35, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

OK, glad you agree; I will contact him first about this (added the brackets for this reason). Great your are going to add info about the two games you mentioned! It seems you convinced me to replay the games you mentioned next week :-)) Perhaps you can send me an email address at GN, so I can send you a suggestion when ready (don't know if I am good at this), though you may know another way to do this. It seems I didn't quite understand your instruction to press space, but I have the weekend to find out ;-) Nice corrections again at the TW pages (I thought I removed the game list by mistake). Have a nice weekend. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gamnos (talk • contribs) 10:32, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Me too, and I've been around for more than 7 years now....

Lectonar (talk) 13:37, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Possibly- I'm afraid I'm a little busy generally at the moment. Do bear in mind though that asking specific people to do GA reviews can come across badly- there have been issues with people doing tit-for-tat reviews in the past. As you're still in the WikiCup, adding them to

We are over half way through the second round of this year's WikiCup and things are going well! Grapple X (submissions), of Pool B, is our highest overall scorer thanks to his prolific writings on television and film. In second place is Pool H's Cwmhiraeth (submissions), thanks primarily to work on biological articles, especially in marine biology and herpetology. Third place goes to Pool E's Casliber (submissions), who also writes primarily on biology (including ornithology and botany) and has already submitted two featured articles this round. Of the 63 contestants remaining, 15 (just under a quarter) have over 100 points this round. However, 25 are yet to score. Please remember to update your submission pages promptly. 32 contestants, the top two from each pool and the 16 next-highest scorers, will advance to round 3.

Congratulations to Matthewedwards (submissions), whose impressive File:Wacht am Rhein map (Opaque).svg became the competition's first featured picture. Also, congratulations to 12george1 (submissions), who claimed good topic points, our first contestant this year to do so, for his work on Wikipedia:Featured topics/1982 Atlantic hurricane season. This leaves featured topics and featured portals as the only sources of points not yet utilised. However, as recent statistics from Miyagawa (submissions) show, no source has yet been utilised this competition to the same extent it has been previously!

It has been observed that the backlogs at good article candidates are building up again. While the points for good article reviews will be remaining constant, any help that can be offered keeping the backlog down would be appreciated. On a related note, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Currently I only see the issues with layout, though I didn't check in depth yet. Still it seems that this article is going to pass the review with low amount of effort on your side. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk

Hello, Khanassassin. You have new messages at Czarkoff's talk page.
Message added 20:47, 2 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.2.116 (talk) 13:53, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 5, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2012
Previous issue | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q4

2011

, the project has:

145 Featured Articles 48 Featured Lists 6 Featured Topics 2 Featured Pictures

37 A-Class Articles 542 Good Articles 9 Good Topics

---

Content

Changes to Featured and Good content News items and announcements

Feature: Project deletion discussions page No featured editor this issue.

---

Project Navigation

• VG Project Main pages

  • Main project – talk
  • Project category – talk
  • Portal – talk

  VG Project Departments

  • talk
  • Cleanup – talk
  • Peer review – talk

   

  • Reference library – talk
  • Newsletter – talk
  • talk

To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 19:26, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi there! You see, I have never played this game and am not familiar with its plot. I am afraid you have to ask someone else to help... Still, good luck with GA nomination of the article! Best wishes, Electroguv (talk) 15:52, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

I'll see what I can do. Give me a day or two. Electroguv (talk) 15:59, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Having taken a quick look at Plot, I can already name the main problem we have here - it goes into detail too much. I would recommend removing redundant and unnecessary (there are loads of it, generally in the last four paragraphs) and stressing only the plot-important info - take the laconic but precise Plot section of Monkey Island (which I did not write, ironically :)) as an example. I'll look more into it tomorrow. Electroguv (talk) 19:22, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi. I'm afraid that I won't be able to help you as currently I've got a lot of The Real World-related business to finish, and I mostly use my free time to work on own article projects. I'd recommend to contact User:S@bre with your problem - it is actually him who wrote Monkey Island's Plot section. Good luck with the article. Electroguv (talk) 18:06, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thanks for your many great edits to video game-related articles, among other topics. Also, congrats on passing 2,000 edits! Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 18:29, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Just for context, I work at the Wikimedia Foundation but I'm also a volunteer admin here on EN. We were just looking at a list of the Wikipedians who've made lots of edits to articles, and saw you recently passed your 1,000th edit to articles (and 2,000th edit overall). Thanks for contributing so much. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 18:31, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

		The Modest Barnstar
		You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this past month! 67.80.64.128 (talk) 22:48, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Round 2 of this year's WikiCup is over, and so we are down to our final 32, in what could be called our quarter-finals. The two highest scorers from each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers overall, have entered round 3, while 30 participants have been eliminated. Pool B's Grapple X (submissions) remains our top scorer with over 700 points; he continues to gain high numbers of points for his good articles on The X-Files, but also Millennium and other subjects. He has also gained points for a good topic, a featured list, multiple good article reviews and several did you knows. Pool E's Casliber (submissions) was second, thanks primarily to his biology articles, with Pool H's Muboshgu (submissions) coming in third, with an impressive 46 did you knows, mostly on the subject of baseball. Casliber and Cwmhiraeth both scored over 600 points. Pools E and H proved our most successful, with each seeing 5 members qualify for round 3, while Pools C and D were the least, with each seeing only 3 reach round 3. However, it was Pool G which saw the lowest scoring, with a little under 400 points combined; Pool H, the highest scoring group, saw over triple that score.

65 points was the lowest qualifying score for round 3; significantly higher than the 11 required to enter round 2, and also higher than the 41 required to reach round 3 last year. However, in 2010, 100 points were needed to secure a place in round 3. 16 will progress to round 4. In round 3, 150 points was the 16th highest score, though, statistically, people tend to up their game a little in later rounds. Last year, 76 points secured a place, while in 2010, a massive 250 points were needed. Guessing how many points will be required is not easy. We still have not seen any featured portals or topics this year, but, on the subject of less common content types, a small correction needs to be made to the previous newsletter:

Western Jackdaw, now a good article, Dana Boomer (submissions) earned triple points for her work on lettuce and work by Stone (submissions) to ready antimony for good article status earned him triple points. Jarry1250 (submissions) managed to expand Vitus Bering

An article on the WikiCup in the Wikimedia Blog, "Improving Wikipedia with friendly competition", was posted at the end of April. This may be of interest to those who are signed up to this newsletter, as well as serving as another way to draw attention to our project. Also, we would again like to thank

Hello, Khanassassin. You have new messages at Talk:Ed, Edd n Eddy/GA2.
Message added 04:39, 2 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:39, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Khanassassin. You have new messages at Talk:Ed, Edd n Eddy/GA2.
Message added 15:28, 2 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:28, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Need your opinion on a final matter there. I've researched the source myself and I just want your opinion before I go ahead. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:29, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:32, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Your

GA nomination of In Cold Blood (video game)

The article

good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:In Cold Blood (video game) for things which need to be addressed. --十八

04:47, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Your

GA nomination of Broken Sword: The Angel of Death

The article

good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Broken Sword: The Angel of Death for things which need to be addressed. --十八

21:14, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Re: Question

I was and still am a fan of The Powerpuff Girls, The Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy, and Codename: Kids next Door, I also watched a bit of Courage the Cowardly Dog but thats about it. If your question relates to those series I might be able to help if not sorry. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:45, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Sure I will help on those, I will see what I can do for Grim Adventures first (Great show). =) - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:52, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Re: In Cold Blood (video game) GAN

Just a little reminder that the review is now 12 days old, and the article needs little else to be promoted (mainly some copyedits).--十八 22:21, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

The Grimm Adventures of Billy & Mandy

Well I improved on the article about the best I can, I will continue editing it where and when I can and I tried looking up reception for the series. After searching, I got almost nothing though (And I thought The Powerpuff Girls was bad) just a heads up. Happy editing =) - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 04:21, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

GA review request

Hello, Khan. Seeing as how I recently reviewed and passed two of the articles you nominated for GA, I was wondering if you would be willing to review

Wikipedia:Featured topics/Video games developed by Key as a Good Topic.--十八

21:11, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Just wanted to say thanks for the review and pass, as it was a long wait.--十八 20:40, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 May newsletter

We're halfway through round 3 (or the quarter finals, if you prefer) and things are running smoothly. We're seeing very high scoring; as of the time of writing, the top 16 all have over 90 points. This has already proved to be more competative than this time last year- in 2011, 76 points secured a place, while in 2010, a massive 250 was the lowest qualifying score. People have also upped their game slightly from last round, which is to be expected as we approach the end of the competition. Leading Pool A is

Western Jackdaw

, which is now a featured article.

This round has seen an unusually high number of featured lists, with nearly one in five remaining participants claiming one, and one user,

Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email

) 23:36, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Cave Story FAC

Since you reviewed this article for GA, I thought you might like to know that it's currently up for FAC at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cave Story/archive1, if you'd like to comment. Axem Titanium (talk) 18:46, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! I gave you a bunch of comments at your FAC as well. Axem Titanium (talk) 20:21, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Title-card-Mgpam.png

Hey- that image's really too complex to be considered public domain. Could you perhaps change the licensing to non-free and add a non-free use rationale? J Milburn (talk) 15:51, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Ed, Edd n Eddy

Rollback was completely inappropriate here- I am not a vandal, and so my edits should not be reverted without comment. I admit I mistakenly believed that you had not added a rationale to the image page, but this is exactly the kind of thing that should have been explained in the edit summary, but which could not have been, because of the fact you were using the rollback tool. If you are going to use the rollback tool, you need to be familiar with

when to use it; if you continue to use it inappropriately, then you will lose the userright. J Milburn (talk

) 12:33, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Re: Broken Sword

I'm not sure what my availability for a GA review would be (I'd rather not leave reviews languishing) but I'll definitely try and swing by and offer my thoughts on the talk page. Cheers, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 19:05, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Nope, never played :) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 19:51, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

New pictures

I got the new picture of Adam and Jake from My Gym Partner's a Monkey, just like you asked! I also uploaded pictures of Ed and Edd yesterday. Sorry, but I didn't upload the logo. I'm working on that. Here are the pictures! StaleCupcakes (talk) 20:46, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

I finally uploaded the show's logo with out the TV-Y7 symbol. Enjoy! StaleCupcakes (talk) 21:16, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

I uploaded the new Adam and Jake picture. By the way, I recall you mentioning in the EENE talk page that you created a Big Picture Show article. Is it still being reviewed? StaleCupcakes (talk) 19:21, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

EENE Episode Articles

Do you think it's OK to make articles on Ed, Edd n Eddy episodes? I know that every episode will not be able to have an article. I would just like to create episode articles for the specials and episodes nominated for an award. What do you think? StaleCupcakes (talk) 18:07, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

On your user page? That will most likely be my final edit in 3 months. Confused? See my user page... StaleCupcakes (talk) 22:38, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

GA Notice

GA Notice
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. {{{sign}}}
· · ·

GAN

I was wondering if you could you GA review

dley

02:02, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Khanassassin. You have new messages at Ethansmith's talk page.
Message added 20:59, 18 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ethan | talk. 20:59, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

GAN

I was wondering if you could

dley

02:25, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Your

GA nomination of Lupo the Butcher

The article

review a nominated article yourself? Statυs (talk

) 03:46, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:BPS Screenshot.png)

Thanks for uploading

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

talk

) 04:31, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Cave Story GA

Hello, Khanassassin. You have new messages at Talk:Cave Story/GA1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

GA review started

Hello, Khanassassin. You have new messages at Talk:Steve Ince/GA1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ed GA Review

Hello, Khanassassin. You have new messages at Talk:Ed (Ed, Edd n Eddy)/GA1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

FA nomination

Hi, you began a nomination here [1] but did not complete it. As Lists are not eligible for FA, I have reverted the edit.

talk

)

Awake GAN

Hello, Khanassassin. You have new messages at Talk:Awake (TV series)/GA1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

FLC

Hello, Khanassassin. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Sym-Bionic Titan episodes/archive1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your

GA nomination of Infinite (Eminem album)

The article

good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Infinite (Eminem album) for things which need to be addressed. Jonayo! ^{Selena 4 ever}

12:18, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Portal:Ed, Edd n Eddy/Wikipedia

A tag has been placed on

criteria for speedy deletion

, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. – Wdchk (talk) 00:48, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Eddy (Ed, Edd n Eddy)/1

Hello. I'm afraid I have nominated

Eddy (Ed, Edd n Eddy) for reassessment, as I do not believe that the article currently meets the good article criteria. Please see the discussion here. J Milburn (talk

) 22:45, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

After looking at the reassessment and the article I think the best solution would be to merge it to List of Ed, Edd n Eddy characters‎. I have started a proposal regarding this at the talk page. AIRcorn (talk) 01:48, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Lupo the Butcher/1

Hello. I have nominated Lupo the Butcher) for reassessment, as I believe the article currently falls short of the good article criteria. Please see the discussion here. Eshlare (talk) 14:18, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Back for a short amount of time

Hey, Khanassassin! Long time no see. I saw all your articles, and I gotta say, I'm pretty impressed. I also saw that you started an Ed, Edd n Eddy Portal. I'd love to see that, but it's probably not going to survive. Know why? J. Milburn is gonna want to tear it up. I'm pissed about this, and all your hard work is just going to waste. I know that he's just doing his job, but the Ed and Eddy articles were decent, if not good. I'm probably not going to do much, since this is going to be the only day in a while that I'll be on Wikipedia. Well, I hope everything turns better, good luck on that Ed, Edd n Eddy portal and I hope it won't get deleted! StaleCupcakes (talk) 17:06, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Your

GA nomination of My Gym Partner's a Monkey

The article

review a nominated article yourself? Statυs (talk

) 19:18, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

RE: FLC

I have replied to your comments at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Ed, Edd n Eddy episodes/archive3 :) Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 20:06, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 June newsletter

Apologies for the lateness of this letter; our usual bot wasn't working. We are now entering round 4, our semi-finals, and have our final 16. A score of 243 was required to reach this round; significantly more than 2011's 76 points, and only a little behind 2010's 250 points. By comparison, last year, 150 points in round 4 secured a place in the final; in 2010, 430 were needed. Commiserations to Pool A's igordebraga (submissions), who scored 242 points, missing out on a place in the round by a whisker. However, congratulations to Pool B's Grapple X (submissions), whose television articles have brought him another round victory. Pool A's Cwmhiraeth (submissions) came second overall, with an impressive list of biological did you knows, good articles and featured articles. Third overall was Pool D's Muboshgu (submissions), with a long list of contibutions, mostly relating to baseball. Of course, with the points resetting every round, the playing field has been levelled. The most successful Pool was Pool D, which saw seven into the final round. Pool B saw four, C saw three and Pool A saw only the two round leaders.

A quick note about other competitions taking place on Wikipedia which may be of interest. There are 13 days remaining in the

Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email

) 10:59, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Request

I was wondering if you could leave comment on List of Awake episodes FLC? Thanks! --

dley

20:48, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Ed, Edd n Eddy

Hi, Khanassassin, I'm beginning the copy-edit of the above article you requested at the GOCE request page. Please feel free to contact me, or to correct or revert my edits if I'm doing something I shouldn't. Sorry about the wait for the copy-edit. Cheers,

Baffle gab1978 (talk

) 22:12, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Done - feel free to contact me about any ongoing issues with the copy-edit. Good luck with your FA nomination. Cheers,

Baffle gab1978 (talk

) 01:33, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

copyedit

I was wondering if you could copy-edit my Awake (TV series) list for FA status. I notice I have had alot of request, so I can review/GA review/etc. for you. Thanks for your time.

dley

23:16, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

List of Awake episodes FLC

List of Awake episodes has been copy-edited by Davejohnsan, hope you will vote at the

dley

03:07, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Lupo the Butcher

Why haven't you tried to fix up Lupo the Butcher? I even provided an additional source on its reassessment page. Statυs (talk) 20:54, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Khanassassin. You have new messages at Talk:Won't_Back_Down_(Eminem_song)/GA1.
Message added 23:04, 8 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I picked up "Won't Back Down" for review and found several issues that must be solved before passing. Take a look. —

21

23:04, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

im new in wikipedia and i just wanna say hi!

Kcrazy4lps (talk) 16:40, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Review

I have reviewed

dley

00:52, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2012

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 5, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2012
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q2

2012

, the project has:

147 Featured Articles 48 Featured Lists 6 Featured Topics 3 Featured Pictures

37 A-Class Articles 542 Good Articles 9 Good Topics

---

Content

Changes to Featured and Good content News items and announcements

No WikiProject feature this issue. No featured editor this issue.

---

Project Navigation

• VG Project Main pages

  • Main project – talk
  • Project category – talk
  • Portal – talk

  VG Project Departments

  • talk
  • Cleanup – talk
  • Peer review – talk

   

  • Reference library – talk
  • Newsletter – talk
  • talk

To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 21:31, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations!

Hi, Khanassassin! We've never really talked, but I supported Ed, Edd n Eddy at its featured article candidacy. I don't know if you've noticed, but it's been promoted! I have been working on Grey's Anatomy, and I am awaiting a copyedit before taking it to FAC, so it was great to see a TV article pass! Congratulations again, TRLIJC19 (talk) 00:37, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Harmonious with the above message; congratulations on your first featured article! TRLIJC19 (talk) 00:54, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Ed FA

Congrats! Axem Titanium (talk) 03:13, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Well, thanks for your help with it! Axem Titanium (talk) 00:58, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Main page appearance: Ed, Edd n Eddy

This is a note to let the main editors of Ed, Edd n Eddy know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on July 23, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 23, 2012. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

original Cartoon Network series and Canadian-made animated series to date. (more...

)

talk

) 23:02, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For the Eminem article contributions, you deserve a barnstar. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 14:29, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Some links for "Stan"

A little off topic considering you're working on LY now, but I found some nice links for "Stan" as well you may like:

• http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1428065/dido-discusses-her-appearance-on-eminems-stan.jhtml
• http://www.rollingstone.com/music/pictures/the-20-most-memorable-duets-of-all-time-20110118/elton-john-and-eminem-0753224
• http://music.ign.com/articles/565/565974p1.html
• http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1445331/fatboy-slim-leads-vma-nods.jhtml
• Google Book
• Google Book

I have plenty more. Let me know if you want. :-) —WP:PENGUIN · ^{[ TALK ]} 19:03, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

I bookmarked them a long time ago but lost the motivation to work on them. Thanks and I'll have more for you. —WP:PENGUIN · ^{[ TALK ]} 19:13, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

A few more:

• http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists/the-500-greatest-songs-of-all-time-20110407/eminem-feat-dido-stan-19691231
• http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2001/jan/09/schools.jeromemonahan1
• http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1611244/eminems-road-relapse-part-2-stardom.jhtml
• http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1648533/swizz-beatz-lil-wayne-revisit-eminems-stan-with-anne.jhtml
• http://edition.cnn.com/2000/SHOWBIZ/Music/11/15/wb.dido-eminem/index.html

—WP:PENGUIN · ^{[ TALK ]} 21:06, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Precious

	animated real life
	Thank you for your animation on the Main page, Ed, Edd n Eddy, the "strong, dimwitted workhorse, ... the neat freak", and the "loudmouth, self-appointed leader", - you are an awesome Wikipedian! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:04, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

The Barnstar of Good Humor

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		I award you the The Barnstar of Good Humor for your dedication in bringing Ed, Edd n Eddy to GA and then FA. Congratz!Smallman12q (talk) 11:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Ed, Edd n Eddy

Was my favorite show :D How are you? Best, Jonayo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 23:30, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 July newsletter

We're approaching the beginning of 2012's final round. Pool A sees Cwmhiraeth (submissions) as the leader, with 300 points being awarded for the featured article Bivalvia, and Pool B sees Grapple X (submissions) in the lead, with 10 good articles, and over 35 articles eligible for good topic points. Pool A sees Muboshgu (submissions) in second place with a number of articles relating to baseball, while Pool B's Ruby2010 (submissions) follows Grapple X, with a variety of contributions including the high-scoring, high-importance featured article on the 2010 film Pride & Prejudice. Ruby2010, like Grapple X, also claimed a number of good topic points; despite this, not a single point has been claimed for featured topics in the contest so far. The same is true for featured portals.

Currently, the eighth-place competitor (and so the lowest scorer who would reach the final round right now) has scored 332, more than double the 150 needed to reach the final round last year. In 2010, however, 430 was the lowest qualifying score. In this competition, we have generally seen scores closer to those in 2010 than those in 2011. Let's see what kind of benchmark we can set for future competitions! As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on

Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email

) 22:26, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Request

Was wondering if you could leave comments at

dley

16:32, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

FLC

Hello, Khanassassin. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Ed, Edd n Eddy episodes/archive3.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Congrats on FL! Axem Titanium (talk) 17:59, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Khanassassin. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Say Hello to My Little Friend/archive1.
Message added 02:27, 19 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

All of the above comments were addressed, and moved to the talk page of the nomination. So, I now hope you can support/oppose also. Cheers,

dley

02:27, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Broken Sword: The Sleeping Dragon

I noticed you reverted an edit I made to Broken Sword: The Sleeping Dragon. I thought I was maintaining a professional feel on the article. What did I do wrong? Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 03:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Your

GA nomination of Ed, Edd n Eddy's Big Picture Show‎

The article Ed, Edd n Eddy's Big Picture Show‎ you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Ed, Edd n Eddy's Big Picture Show‎ for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:02, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Broken Sword 4 soundtrack.jpg)

Thanks for uploading

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

talk

) 04:15, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Broken Sword DC soundtrack.jpg)

Thanks for uploading

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

talk

) 04:15, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 August newsletter

The final is upon us! We are down to our final 8. A massive 573 was our lowest qualifying score; this is higher than the 150 points needed last year and the 430 needed in 2010. Even in 2009, when points were acquired for mainspace edit count in addition to audited content, 417 points secured a place. That leaves this year's WikiCup, by one measure at least, our most competitive ever. Our finalists, ordered by round 4 score, are:

1. Grapple X (submissions) once again finishes the round in first place, leading Pool B. Grapple X writes articles about television, and especially The X-Files and Millenium, with good articles making up the bulk of the score.
2. Miyagawa (submissions) led Pool A this round. Fourth-place finalist last year, Miyagawa writes on a variety of topics, and has reached the final primarily off the back of his massive number of did you knows.
3. Ruby2010 (submissions) was second in Pool B. Ruby2010 writes primarily on television and film, and scores primarily from good articles.
4. Casliber (submissions) finished third in Pool B. Casliber is something of a WikiCup veteran, having finished sixth in 2011 and fourth in 2010. Casliber writes on the natural sciences, including ornithology, botany and astronomy. Over half of Casliber's points this round were bonus points from the high-importance articles he has worked on.
5. Cwmhiraeth (submissions) came second in Pool A. Also writing on biology, especially marine biology, Cwmhiraeth received 390 points for one featured article (Bivalvia) and one good article (pelican), topping up with a large number of did you knows.
6. Muboshgu (submissions) was third in Pool A. Muboshgu writes primarily on baseball, and this round saw Muboshgu's first featured article, Derek Jeter, promoted on its fourth attempt at FAC.
7. Dana Boomer (submissions) was fourth in Pool A. She writes on a variety of topics, including horses, but this round also saw the high-importance lettuce reach featured article status.
8. Sasata (submissions) is another WikiCup veteran, having been a finalist in 2009 and 2010. He writes mostly on mycology.

However, we must also say goodbye to the eight who did not make the final, having fallen at the last hurdle:

1111tomica (submissions

). We hope to see you all next year.

On the subject of next year, a discussion has been opened

Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email

) 00:17, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Khanassassin. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Megas XLR episodes/archive1.
Message added 15:59, 2 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

dley

15:59, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Request

Hi. Sorry to bother you, yet again, but, if you find time, could you maybe leave comments at

dley

16:03, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:The Ed-Touchables.jpg)

Thanks for uploading

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

talk

) 04:50, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

Megas XLR (season 1), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DMV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Broken Sword: The Shadow of the Templars‎

Would you care to join the discussion I started for that article concerning the dispute between you and the IP editor? It would be more productive if we could figure out why there is a disagreement and establish a consensus to reference in the future. Thanks —Torchiest ^talk_edits 17:45, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your

GA nomination of The Goat Puzzle

The article

✔

) 18:02, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Request

Hi, Khanassassin! I've seen your work at FAC, and was wondering if you could review Sadie Harris at its featured article candidacy? Thanks, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 22:41, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Ed, Edd n Eddy's Big Picture Show

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Yngvadottir (talk