Permian–Triassic extinction event

Marine extinction intensity during Phanerozoic

%

Millions of years ago

(H)

K–Pg

Tr–J

P–Tr

Cap

Late D

O–S

Plot of extinction intensity (percentage of marine genera that are present in each interval of time but do not exist in the following interval) vs time in the past.^[1] Geological periods are annotated (by abbreviation and colour) above. The Permian–Triassic extinction event is the most significant event for marine genera, with just over 50% (according to this source) perishing. (source and image info)

Approximately 251.9 million years ago, the Permian–Triassic (P–T, P–Tr) extinction event (PTME; also known as the Late Permian extinction event,

The precise causes of the Great Dying remain unknown. The scientific consensus is that the main cause of extinction was the flood basalt volcanic eruptions that created the Siberian Traps,^[19] which released sulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide, resulting in euxinia,^[20][21] elevating global temperatures,^[22][23][24] and acidifying the oceans.^[25][26][3] The level of atmospheric carbon dioxide rose from around 400 ppm to 2,500 ppm with approximately 3,900 to 12,000 gigatonnes of carbon being added to the ocean-atmosphere system during this period.^[22] Important proposed contributing factors include the emission of much additional carbon dioxide from the thermal decomposition of hydrocarbon deposits, including oil and coal, triggered by the eruptions,^[27][28] emissions of methane from the gasification of methane clathrates,^[29] emissions of methane possibly by novel methanogenic microorganisms nourished by minerals dispersed in the eruptions,^[30][31][32] an extraterrestrial impact creating the Araguainha crater and consequent seismic release of methane,^[33][34][35] and the destruction of the ozone layer and increase in harmful solar radiation.^[36][37][38]

Dating

Previously, it was thought that rock sequences spanning the Permian–Triassic boundary were too few and contained too many gaps for scientists to reliably determine its details.^[44] However, it is now possible to date the extinction with millennial precision. U–Pb zircon dates from five volcanic ash beds from the Global Stratotype Section and Point for the Permian–Triassic boundary at Meishan, China, establish a high-resolution age model for the extinction – allowing exploration of the links between global environmental perturbation, carbon cycle disruption, mass extinction, and recovery at millennial timescales. The first appearance of the conodont Hindeodus parvus has been used to delineate the Permian-Triassic boundary.^[45][46]

The extinction occurred between 251.941 ± 0.037 and 251.880 ± 0.031 million years ago, a duration of 60 ± 48 thousand years.

Uncertainty exists regarding the duration of the overall extinction and about the timing and duration of various groups' extinctions within the greater process. Some evidence suggests that there were multiple extinction pulses[66]^[67][15] or that the extinction was long and spread out over a few million years, with a sharp peak in the last million years of the Permian.^[68][62][69] Statistical analyses of some highly fossiliferous strata in Meishan, Zhejiang Province in southeastern China, suggest that the main extinction was clustered around one peak,^[18] while a study of the Liangfengya section found evidence of two extinction waves, MEH-1 and MEH-2, which varied in their causes,^[70] and a study of the Shangsi section showed two extinction pulses with different causes too.^[71] Recent research shows that different groups became extinct at different times; for example, while difficult to date absolutely, ostracod and brachiopod extinctions were separated by around 670,000 to 1.17 million years.^[72] Palaeoenvironmental analysis of Lopingian strata in the Bowen Basin of Queensland indicates numerous intermittent periods of marine environmental stress from the middle to late Lopingian leading up to the end-Permian extinction proper, supporting aspects of the gradualist hypothesis.^[73] Additionally, the decline in marine species richness and the structural collapse of marine ecosystems may have been decoupled as well, with the former preceding the latter by about 61,000 years according to one study.^[74]

Whether the terrestrial and marine extinctions were synchronous or asynchronous is another point of controversy. Evidence from a well-preserved sequence in east Greenland suggests that the terrestrial and marine extinctions began simultaneously. In this sequence, the decline of animal life is concentrated in a period approximately 10,000 to 60,000 years long, with plants taking an additional several hundred thousand years to show the full impact of the event.^[75] Many sedimentary sequences from South China show synchronous terrestrial and marine extinctions.^[76] Research in the Sydney Basin of the PTME's duration and course also supports a synchronous occurrence of the terrestrial and marine biotic collapses.^[77] Other scientists believe the terrestrial mass extinction began between 60,000 and 370,000 years before the onset of the marine mass extinction.^[78][79] Chemostratigraphic analysis from sections in Finnmark and Trøndelag shows the terrestrial floral turnover occurred before the large negative δ¹³C shift during the marine extinction.^[80] Dating of the boundary between the Dicynodon and Lystrosaurus assemblage zones in the Karoo Basin indicates that the terrestrial extinction occurred earlier than the marine extinction.^[81] The Sunjiagou Formation of South China also records a terrestrial ecosystem demise predating the marine crisis.^[82] Other research still has found that the terrestrial extinction occurred after the marine extinction in the tropics.^[83]

Studies of the timing and causes of the Permian-Triassic extinction are complicated by the often-overlooked

Marine invertebrates suffered the greatest losses during the P–Tr extinction. Evidence of this was found in samples from south China sections at the P–Tr boundary. Here, 286 out of 329 marine invertebrate genera disappear within the final two sedimentary zones containing conodonts from the Permian.^[18] The decrease in diversity was probably caused by a sharp increase in extinctions, rather than a decrease in speciation.^[92]

The extinction primarily affected organisms with calcium carbonate skeletons, especially those reliant on stable CO₂ levels to produce their skeletons.^[93] These organisms were susceptible to the effects of the ocean acidification that resulted from increased atmospheric CO₂. There is also evidence that endemism was a strong risk factor influencing a taxon's likelihood of extinction. Bivalve taxa that were endemic and localised to a specific region were more likely to go extinct than cosmopolitan taxa.^[94] There was little latitudinal difference in the survival rates of taxa.^[95]

Among

Ostracods experienced prolonged diversity perturbations during the Changhsingian before the PTME proper, when immense proportions of them abruptly vanished.[107] At least 74% of ostracods died out during the PTME itself.^[108]

Bryozoans had been on a long-term decline throughout the Late Permian epoch before they suffered even more catastrophic losses during the PTME.^[109]

Deep water sponges suffered a significant diversity loss and exhibited a decrease in spicule size over the course of the PTME. Shallow water sponges were affected much less strongly; they experienced an increase in spicule size and much lower loss of morphological diversity compared to their deep water counterparts.^[110]

Foraminifera suffered a severe bottleneck in diversity.^[5] Approximately 93% of latest Permian foraminifera became extinct, with 50% of the clade Textulariina, 92% of Lagenida, 96% of Fusulinida, and 100% of Miliolida disappearing.^[111] The reason why lagenides survived while fusulinoidean fusulinides went completely extinct may have been due to the greater range of environmental tolerance and greater geographic distribution of the former compared to the latter.^[112]

Cladodontomorph sharks likely survived the extinction because of their ability to survive in refugia in the deep oceans. This hypothesis is based on the discovery of

The Lilliput effect, the phenomenon of dwarfing of species during and immediately following a mass extinction event, has been observed across the Permian-Triassic boundary,^[115][116] notably occurring in foraminifera,^{[117][118][119]} brachiopods,^{[120][121][122]} bivalves,^{[123][124][125]} and ostracods.^[126][127] Though gastropods that survived the cataclysm were smaller in size than those that did not,^[128] it remains debated whether the Lilliput effect truly took hold among gastropods.^{[129][130][131]} Some gastropod taxa, termed "Gulliver gastropods", ballooned in size during and immediately following the mass extinction,^[132] exemplifying the Lilliput effect's opposite, which has been dubbed the Brobdingnag effect.^[133]

Terrestrial invertebrates

The Permian had great diversity in insect and other invertebrate species, including the largest insects ever to have existed. The end-Permian is the largest known mass extinction of insects;^[16] according to some sources, it may well be the only mass extinction to significantly affect insect diversity.^[134][135] Eight or nine insect orders became extinct and ten more were greatly reduced in diversity. Palaeodictyopteroids (insects with piercing and sucking mouthparts) began to decline during the mid-Permian; these extinctions have been linked to a change in flora. The greatest decline occurred in the Late Permian and was probably not directly caused by weather-related floral transitions.^[44]

Terrestrial plants

The geological record of terrestrial plants is sparse and based mostly on pollen and spore studies. Floral changes across the Permian-Triassic boundary are highly variable depending on the location and preservation quality of any given site.^[136] Plants are relatively immune to mass extinction, with the impact of all the major mass extinctions "insignificant" at a family level.^{[42][dubious – discuss]} Even the reduction observed in species diversity (of 50%) may be mostly due to taphonomic processes.^[137][42] However, a massive rearrangement of ecosystems does occur, with plant abundances and distributions changing profoundly and all the forests virtually disappearing.^[138][42] The dominant floral groups changed, with many groups of land plants entering abrupt decline, such as Cordaites (gymnosperms) and Glossopteris (seed ferns).^[139][140] The severity of plant extinction has been disputed.^[141][137]

The Glossopteris-dominated flora that characterised high-latitude Gondwana collapsed in Australia around 370,000 years before the Permian-Triassic boundary, with this flora's collapse being less constrained in western Gondwana but still likely occurring a few hundred thousand years before the boundary.^[142]

The Cordaites flora, which dominated the Angaran floristic realm corresponding to Siberia, collapsed over the course of the extinction.[143] In the Kuznetsk Basin, the aridity-induced extinction of the regions's humid-adapted forest flora dominated by cordaitaleans occurred approximately 252.76 Ma, around 820,000 years before the end-Permian extinction in South China, suggesting that the end-Permian biotic catastrophe may have started earlier on land and that the ecological crisis may have been more gradual and asynchronous on land compared to its more abrupt onset in the marine realm.^[144]

In North China, the transition between the Upper Shihhotse and Sunjiagou Formations and their lateral equivalents marked a very large extinction of plants in the region. Those plant genera that did not go extinct still experienced a great reduction in their geographic range. Following this transition, coal swamps vanished. The North Chinese floral extinction correlates with the decline of the Gigantopteris flora of South China.^[145]

In South China, the subtropical Cathaysian gigantopterid dominated rainforests abruptly collapsed.^{[146][147][148]} The floral extinction in South China is associated with bacterial blooms in soil and nearby lacustrine ecosystems, with soil erosion resulting from the die-off of plants being their likely cause.^[149] Wildfires too likely played a role in the fall of Gigantopteris.^[150]

A conifer flora in what is now Jordan, known from fossils near the Dead Sea, showed unusual stability over the Permian-Triassic transition, and appears to have been only minimally affected by the crisis.^[151]

Terrestrial vertebrates

The terrestrial vertebrate extinction occurred rapidly, taking 50,000 years or less.

The groups that survived suffered extremely heavy losses of species and some terrestrial vertebrate groups very nearly became extinct at the end of the Permian. Some of the surviving groups did not persist for long past this period, but others that barely survived went on to produce diverse and long-lasting lineages. However, it took 30 million years for the terrestrial vertebrate fauna to fully recover both numerically and ecologically.[156]

It is difficult to analyze extinction and survival rates of land organisms in detail because few terrestrial fossil beds span the Permian–Triassic boundary. The best-known record of vertebrate changes across the Permian–Triassic boundary occurs in the Karoo Supergroup of South Africa, but statistical analyses have so far not produced clear conclusions.^[157] One study of the Karoo Basin found that 69% of terrestrial vertebrates went extinct over 300,000 years leading up to the Permian-Triassic boundary, followed by a minor extinction pulse involving four taxa that survived the previous extinction interval.^[158] Another study of latest Permian vertebrates in the Karoo Basin found that 54% of them went extinct due to the PTME.^[159]

Biotic recovery

In the wake of the extinction event, the ecological structure of present-day biosphere evolved from the stock of surviving taxa. In the sea, the "Palaeozoic evolutionary fauna" declined while the "modern evolutionary fauna" achieved greater dominance;

A cosmopolitanism event began immediately after the end-Permian extinction event.[171] Marine post-extinction faunas were mostly species-poor and were dominated by few disaster taxa such as the bivalves Claraia, Unionites, Eumorphotis, and Promyalina,^[172] the conodonts Clarkina and Hindeodus,^[173] the inarticulate brachiopod Lingularia,^[172] and the foraminifera Earlandia and Rectocornuspira kalhori,^[174] the latter of which is sometimes classified under the genus Ammodiscus.^[175] Their guild diversity was also low.^[176]

The speed of recovery from the extinction is disputed. Some scientists estimate that it took 10 million years (until the Middle Triassic)^[177] due to the severity of the extinction. However, studies in Bear Lake County, near Paris, Idaho,^[178] and nearby sites in Idaho and Nevada^[179] showed a relatively quick rebound in a localized Early Triassic marine ecosystem (Paris biota), taking around 1.3 million years to recover,^[178] while an unusually diverse and complex ichnobiota is known from Italy less than a million years after the end-Permian extinction.^[180] Additionally, the complex Guiyang biota found near Guiyang, China also indicates life thrived in some places just a million years after the mass extinction,^[181][182] as does a fossil assemblage known as the Shanggan fauna found in Shanggan, China^[183] and a gastropod fauna from the Al Jil Formation of Oman.^[184] Regional differences in the pace of biotic recovery existed,^[185] which suggests that the impact of the extinction may have been felt less severely in some areas than others, with differential environmental stress and instability being the source of the variance.^[186][187] In addition, it has been proposed that although overall taxonomic diversity rebounded rapidly, functional ecological diversity took much longer to return to its pre-extinction levels;^[188] one study concluded that marine ecological recovery was still ongoing 50 million years after the extinction, during the latest Triassic, even though taxonomic diversity had rebounded in a tenth of that time.^[189]

The pace and timing of recovery also differed based on clade and mode of life. Seafloor communities maintained a comparatively low diversity until the end of the Early Triassic, approximately 4 million years after the extinction event.

Whereas most marine communities were fully recovered by the Middle Triassic,[208]^[209] global marine diversity reached pre-extinction values no earlier than the Middle Jurassic, approximately 75 million years after the extinction event.^[210]

Prior to the extinction, about two-thirds of marine animals were

Linguliform brachiopods were commonplace immediately after the extinction event, their abundance having been essentially unaffected by the crisis. Adaptations for oxygen-poor and warm environments, such as increased lophophoral cavity surface, shell width/length ratio, and shell miniaturisation, are observed in post-extinction linguliforms.[219] The surviving brachiopod fauna was very low in diversity and exhibited no provincialism whatsoever.^[220] Brachiopods began their recovery around 250.1 ± 0.3 Ma, as marked by the appearance of the genus Meishanorhynchia, believed to be the first of the progenitor brachiopods that evolved after the mass extinction.^[221] Major brachiopod rediversification only began in the late Spathian and Anisian in conjunction with the decline of widespread anoxia and extreme heat and the expansion of more habitable climatic zones.^[222] Brachiopod taxa during the Anisian recovery interval were only phylogenetically related to Late Permian brachiopods at a familial taxonomic level or higher; the ecology of brachiopods had radically changed from before in the mass extinction's aftermath.^[223]

Ostracods were extremely rare during the basalmost Early Triassic.^[224] Taxa associated with microbialites were disproportionately represented among ostracod survivors.^[108] Ostracod recovery began in the Spathian.^[225] Despite high taxonomic turnover, the ecological life modes of Early Triassic ostracods remained rather similar to those of pre-PTME ostracods.^[226]

Bryozoans in the Early Triassic were not diverse, represented mainly by members of Trepostomatida. During the Middle Triassic, there was a rise in bryozoan diversity, which peaked in the Carnian.^[227]

Crinoids ("sea lilies") suffered a selective extinction, resulting in a decrease in the variety of their forms.^[228] Though cladistic analyses suggest the beginning of their recovery to have taken place in the Induan, the recovery of their diversity as measured by fossil evidence was far less brisk, showing up in the late Ladinian.^[229] Their adaptive radiation after the extinction event resulted in forms possessing flexible arms becoming widespread; motility, predominantly a response to predation pressure, also became far more prevalent.^[230] Though their taxonomic diversity remained relatively low, crinoids regained much of their ecological dominance by the Middle Triassic epoch.^[216]

Stem-group echinoids survived the PTME.^[231] The survival of miocidarid echinoids such as Eotiaris is likely attributable to their ability to thrive in a wide range of environmental conditions.^[232]

Conodonts saw a rapid recovery during the Induan,^[233] with anchignathodontids experiencing a diversity peak in the earliest Induan. Gondolellids diversified at the end of the Griesbachian; this diversity spike was most responsible for the overall conodont diversity peak in the Smithian.^[234] Segminiplanate conodonts again experienced a brief period of domination in the early Spathian, probably related to a transient oxygenation of deep waters.^[235] Neospathodid conodonts survived the crisis but underwent proteromorphosis.^[236]

Microbial reefs predominated across shallow seas for a short time during the earliest Triassic,

Ichnocoenoses show that marine ecosystems recovered to pre-extinction levels of ecological complexity by the late Olenekian.[247] Anisian ichnocoenoses show slightly lower diversity than Spathian ichnocoenoses, although this was likely a taphonomic consequence of increased and deeper bioturbation erasing evidence of shallower bioturbation.^[248]

In East Greenland, lycophytes replaced gymnosperms as the dominant plants. Later, other groups of gymnosperms again become dominant but again suffered major die-offs. These cyclical flora shifts occurred a few times over the course of the extinction period and afterward. These fluctuations of the dominant flora between woody and herbaceous taxa indicate chronic environmental stress resulting in a loss of most large woodland plant species. The successions and extinctions of plant communities do not coincide with the shift in δ¹³C values but occurred many years after.^[61]

In what is now the Barents Sea of the coast of Norway, the post-extinction fauna is dominated by pteridophytes and lycopods, which were suited for primary succession and recolonisation of devastated areas, although gymnosperms made a rapid recovery, with the lycopod dominated flora not persisting across most of the Early Triassic as postulated in other regions.^[256]

In Europe and North China, the interval of recovery was dominated by the lycopsid Pleuromeia, an opportunistic pioneer plant that filled ecological vacancies until other plants were able to expand out of refugia and recolonise the land. Conifers became common by the early Anisian, while pteridosperms and cycadophytes only fully recovered by the late Anisian.^[257]

During the survival phase in the terrestrial extinction's immediate aftermath, from the latest Changhsingian to the Griesbachian, South China was dominated by opportunistic lycophytes.^[258] Low-lying herbaceous vegetation dominated by the isoetalean Tomiostrobus was ubiquitous following the collapse of the gigantopterid-dominated forests of before. In contrast to the highly biodiverse gigantopterid rainforests, the post-extinction landscape of South China was near-barren and had vastly lower diversity.^[148] Plant survivors of the PTME in South China experienced extremely high rates of mutagenesis induced by heavy metal poisoning.^[259] From the late Griesbachian to the Smithian, conifers and ferns began to rediversify. After the Smithian, the opportunistic lycophyte flora declined, as the newly radiating conifer and fern species permanently replaced them as the dominant components of South China's flora.^[258]

In Tibet, the early Dienerian Endosporites papillatus–Pinuspollenites thoracatus assemblages closely resemble late Changhsingian Tibetan floras, suggesting that the widespread, dominant latest Permian flora resurged easily after the PTME. However, in the late Dienerian, a major shift towards assemblages dominated by cavate trilete spores took place, heralding widespread deforestation and a rapid change to hotter, more humid conditions. Quillworts and spike mosses dominated Tibetan flora for about a million years after this shift.^[260]

In Pakistan, then the northern margin of Gondwana, the flora was rich in lycopods associated with conifers and pteridosperms. Floral turnovers continued to occur due to repeated perturbations arising from recurrent volcanic activity until terrestrial ecosystems stabilised around 2.1 Myr after the PTME.^[261]

In southwestern Gondwana, the post-extinction flora was dominated by bennettitaleans and cycads, with members of Peltaspermales, Ginkgoales, and Umkomasiales being less common constituents of this flora. Around the Induan-Olenekian boundary, as palaeocommunities recovered, a new Dicroidium flora was established, in which Umkomasiales continued to be prominent and in which Equisetales and Cycadales were subordinate forms. The Dicroidium flora further diversified in the Anisian to its peak, wherein Umkomasiales and Ginkgoales constituted most of the tree canopy and Peltaspermales, Petriellales, Cycadales, Umkomasiales, Gnetales, Equisetales, and Dipteridaceae dominated the understory.^[142]

Coal gap

No

On the other hand, the lack of coal may simply reflect the scarcity of all known sediments from the Early Triassic. Coal-producing ecosystems, rather than disappearing, may have moved to areas where we have no sedimentary record for the Early Triassic.^[42] For example, in eastern Australia a cold climate had been the norm for a long period, with a peat mire ecosystem adapted to these conditions.^[262] Approximately 95% of these peat-producing plants went locally extinct at the P–Tr boundary;^[263] coal deposits in Australia and Antarctica disappear significantly before the P–Tr boundary.^[42]

Terrestrial vertebrates

Land vertebrates took an unusually long time to recover from the P–Tr extinction; palaeontologist

Sauropsids

birds

(only extant dinosaurs) and mammals (only extant synapsids) would diversify and share the world.

Temnospondyls

Temnospondyl amphibians made a quick recovery; the appearance in the fossil record of so many temnospondyl clades suggests they may have been ideally suited as pioneer species that recolonised decimated ecosystems.^[287] During the Induan, tupilakosaurids in particular thrived as disaster taxa,^[288] including Tupilakosaurus itself,^[289] though they gave way to other temnospondyls as ecosystems recovered.^[288] Temnospondyls were reduced in size during the Induan, but their body size rebounded to pre-PTME levels during the Olenekian.^[290] Mastodonsaurus and trematosaurians were the main aquatic and semiaquatic predators during most of the Triassic, some preying on tetrapods and others on fish.^[291]

Terrestrial invertebrates

Most fossil insect groups found after the Permian–Triassic boundary differ significantly from those before: Of Paleozoic insect groups, only the

protodonates became extinct by the end of the Permian. Though Triassic insects are very different from those of the Permian, a gap in the insect fossil record spans approximately 15 million years from the late Permian to early Triassic. In well-documented Late Triassic deposits, fossils overwhelmingly consist of modern fossil insect groups.^[134]

Microbially induced sedimentary structures (MISS) dominated North Chinese terrestrial fossil assemblages in the Early Triassic.^[292][293] In Arctic Canada as well, MISS became a common occurrence following the Permian-Triassic extinction.^[294] The prevalence of MISS in many Early Triassic rocks shows that microbial mats were an important feature of post-extinction ecosystems that were denuded of bioturbators that would have otherwise prevented their widespread occurrence. The disappearance of MISS later in the Early Triassic likely indicated a greater recovery of terrestrial ecosystems and specifically a return of prevalent bioturbation.^[293]

Hypotheses about cause

Pinpointing the exact causes of the Permian–Triassic extinction event is difficult, mostly because it occurred over 250 million years ago, and since then much of the evidence that would have pointed to the cause has been destroyed or is concealed deep within the Earth under many layers of rock. The

sea floor is completely recycled each 200 million years or so by the ongoing processes of plate tectonics and seafloor spreading

, leaving no useful indications beneath the ocean.

Yet, scientists have gathered significant evidence for causes, and several mechanisms have been proposed. The proposals include both catastrophic and gradual processes (similar to those theorized for the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event).

• The catastrophic group includes one or more large
  methane hydrate deposits or metabolism of organic carbon deposits by methanogenic
  microbes.
• The gradual group includes sea level change, increasing
  aridity
  .

Any hypothesis about the cause must explain the selectivity of the event, which affected organisms with calcium carbonate skeletons most severely; the long period (4 to 6 million years) before recovery started, and the minimal extent of biological mineralization (despite inorganic carbonates being deposited) once the recovery began.^[93]

Volcanism

Siberian Traps

The flood basalt eruptions that produced the Siberian Traps constituted one of the largest known volcanic events on Earth and covered over 2,000,000 square kilometres (770,000 sq mi) with lava (roughly the size of Saudi Arabia).^{[295][296][297][298]} Such a vast areal extent of the flood basalts may have contributed to their exceptionally catastrophic impact.^[299] The date of the Siberian Traps eruptions and the extinction event are in good agreement.^[47][300]

The timeline of the extinction event strongly indicates it was caused by events in the large igneous province of the Siberian Traps.^{[301][19][302]} A study of the Norilsk and Maymecha-Kotuy regions of the northern Siberian platform indicates that volcanic activity occurred during a small number of high intensity pulses that exuded enormous volumes of magma, as opposed to flows emplaced at regular intervals.^[303]

The rate of carbon dioxide release from the Siberian Traps represented one of the most rapid rises of carbon dioxide levels in the geologic record,^[304] with the rate of carbon dioxide emissions being estimated by one study to be five times faster than the rate during the already catastrophic Capitanian mass extinction event,^[305] which occurred as a result of the activity of the Emeishan Traps in southwestern China at the end of the Middle Permian.^{[306][307][308]} Carbon dioxide levels prior to and after the eruptions are poorly constrained, but may have jumped from between 500 and 4,000 ppm prior to the extinction event to around 8,000 ppm after the extinction according to one estimate.^[21]

Another study estimated pre-PTME carbon dioxide levels at 400 ppm that then rose to around 2,500 ppm during the extinction event, with approximately 3,900 to 12,000 gigatonnes of carbon being added to the ocean-atmosphere system.^[22] As carbon dioxide levels shot up, extreme temperature rise would have followed,^[309] though some evidence suggests a lag of 12,000 to 128,000 years between the rise in volcanic carbon dioxide emissions and global warming.^[310] During the latest Permian, before the PTME, global average surface temperatures were about 18.2 °C.^[311] Global temperatures shot up to as much as 35 °C, and this hyperthermal condition may have lasted as long as 500,000 years.^[22] Air temperatures at Gondwana's high southern latitudes experienced a warming of ~10–14 °C.^[23] According to oxygen isotope shifts from conodont apatite in South China, low latitude surface water temperatures skyrocketed by about 8 °C.^[24] In Iran, tropical SSTs were between 27 and 33 °C during the Changhsingian but jumped to over 35 °C during the PTME.^[312]

So much carbon dioxide was released that inorganic carbon sinks were overwhelmed and depleted, enabling the extremely high carbon dioxide concentrations to persist in the atmosphere for much longer than would have otherwise been possible.^[313] The position and alignment of Pangaea at the time made the inorganic carbon cycle very inefficient at returning volcanically emitted carbon back to the lithosphere and thus contributed to the exceptional lethality of carbon dioxide emissions during the PTME.^[314] In a 2020 paper, scientists reconstructed the mechanisms that led to the extinction event in a biogeochemical model, showed the consequences of the greenhouse effect on the marine environment, and concluded that the mass extinction can be traced back to volcanic CO₂ emissions.^[315][9] Further evidence based on paired coronene-mercury spikes for a volcanic combustion cause of the mass extinction has also been found.^[316][30] The synchronicity of geographically disparate mercury anomalies with the environmental enrichment in isotopically light carbon confirms a common volcanogenic cause for these mercury spikes.^[317] Te/Th values increase twentyfold over the PTME, further indicating it was concomitant with extreme volcanism.^[318] A major volcanogenic influx of isotopically light zinc from the Siberian Traps has also been recorded, further confirming that volcanism was contemporary with the PTME.^[319]

The Siberian Traps had unusual features that made them even more dangerous. The Siberian lithosphere is significantly enriched in

aerosols, which would have blocked out sunlight and thus disrupted photosynthesis both on land and in the photic zone of the ocean, causing food chains to collapse. These volcanic outbursts of sulphur also induced brief but severe global cooling that interrupted the broader trend of rapid global warming,^[322] leading to glacio-eustatic sea level fall.^[320][323]

The eruptions may also have caused acid rain as the aerosols washed out of the atmosphere.

mollusks and planktonic organisms which had calcium carbonate shells. Pure flood basalts produce fluid, low-viscosity lava, and do not hurl debris into the atmosphere. It appears, however, that 20% of the output of the Siberian Traps eruptions was pyroclastic (consisted of ash and other debris thrown high into the atmosphere), increasing the short-term cooling effect.^[325] When all of the dust and ash clouds and aerosols washed out of the atmosphere, the excess carbon dioxide emitted by the Siberian Traps would have remained and global warming would have proceeded without any mitigating effects.^[309]

The Siberian Traps are underlain by thick sequences of Early-Mid

fly ash slurries developed. ... Mafic megascale eruptions are long-lived events that would allow significant build-up of global ash clouds."^[331][332] In a statement, Grasby said, "In addition to these volcanoes causing fires through coal, the ash it spewed was highly toxic and was released in the land and water, potentially contributing to the worst extinction event in earth history."^[333] However, some researchers propose that these supposed fly ashes were actually the result of wildfires instead, and were not related to massive coal combustion by intrusive volcanism.^[334] A 2013 study led by Q.Y. Yang reported that the total amounts of important volatiles emitted from the Siberian Traps consisted of 8.5 × 10⁷ Tg CO₂, 4.4 × 10⁶ Tg CO, 7.0 × 10⁶ Tg H₂S, and 6.8 × 10⁷ Tg SO₂. The data support a popular notion that the end-Permian mass extinction on the Earth was caused by the emission of enormous amounts of volatiles from the Siberian Traps into the atmosphere.^[335]

The sill-dominated mode of emplacement of the Siberian Traps made their warming effects more prolonged; whereas extrusive volcanism generates an abundance of subaerial basalts that efficiently sequester carbon dioxide via the silicate weathering process, underground sills cannot sequester atmospheric carbon dioxide and mitigate global warming.^[336]

Mercury anomalies corresponding to the time of Siberian Traps activity have been found in many geographically disparate sites,

nickel aerosols were also released by Siberian Traps volcanic activity,^[343][344] further contributing to metal poisoning.^[345] Cobalt and arsenic emissions from the Siberian Traps caused further still environmental stress.^[338]

The devastation wrought by the Siberian Traps did not end following the Permian-Triassic boundary. Stable carbon isotope fluctuations suggest that massive Siberian Traps activity recurred many times over the course of the Early Triassic;[346] this episodic return of severe volcanism caused further extinction events during the epoch.^[347] Additionally, enhanced reverse weathering and depletion of siliceous carbon sinks enabled extreme warmth to persist for much longer than expected if the excess carbon dioxide was sequestered by silicate rock.^[202] The decline in biological silicate deposition resulting from the mass extinction of siliceous organisms acted as a positive feedback loop wherein mass death of marine life exacerbated and prolonged extreme hothouse conditions.^[348]

Choiyoi Silicic Large Igneous Province

A second flood basalt event that emplaced what is now known as the Choiyoi Silicic Large Igneous Province in southwestern Gondwana between around 286 Ma and 247 Ma has also been suggested as a possible extinction mechanism.^[142] Being about 1,300,000 cubic kilometres in volume^[349] and 1,680,000 square kilometres in area, this flood basalt event was approximately 40% the size of the Siberian Traps and thus may have been a significant additional factor explaining the severity of the end-Permian extinction.^[142] Specifically, this flood basalt has been implicated in the regional demise of the Gondwanan Glossopteris flora.^[350]

Indochina-South China subduction-zone volcanic arc

Mercury anomalies preceding the end-Permian extinction have been discovered in what was then the boundary between the South China Craton and the Indochinese plate, which was home to a subduction zone and a corresponding volcanic arc. Hafnium isotopes from syndepositional magmatic zircons found in ash beds created by this pulse of volcanic activity confirm its origin in subduction-zone volcanism rather than large igneous province activity.^[351] The enrichment of copper samples from these deposits in isotopically light copper provide additional confirmation of the felsic nature of this volcanism and that its origin was not a large igneous province.^[352] This volcanism has been speculated to have caused local episodes of biotic stress among radiolarians, sponges, and brachiopods that took place over the 60,000 years preceding the end-Permian marine extinction, as well as an ammonoid crisis manifested in their decreased morphological complexity and size and their increased rate of turnover that began in the lower C. yini biozone, around 200,000 years prior to the end-Permian extinction.^[351]

Methane clathrate gasification

Main article: Clathrate gun hypothesis

Further information:

clathrates fairly close to the surface of permafrost and, in much larger quantities, on continental shelves and the deeper seabed close to them. Oceanic methane hydrates are usually found buried in sediments where the seawater is at least 300 m (980 ft) deep. They can be found up to about 2,000 m (6,600 ft) below the sea floor, but usually only about 1,100 m (3,600 ft) below the sea floor.^[353]

The release of methane from the clathrates has been considered as a cause because scientists have found worldwide evidence of a swift decrease of about 1% in the ¹³C ⁄ ¹²C

carbonate rocks from the end-Permian.^[75][354] This is the first, largest, and most rapid of a series of negative and positive excursions (decreases and increases in ¹³C ⁄ ¹²C ratio) that continues until the isotope ratio abruptly stabilised in the middle Triassic, followed soon afterwards by the recovery of calcifying life forms (organisms that use calcium carbonate to build hard parts such as shells).^[102] While a variety of factors may have contributed to this drop in the ¹³C ⁄ ¹²C ratio, a 2002 review found most of them to be insufficient to account fully for the observed amount:^[29]

• Gases from volcanic eruptions have a ¹³C ⁄ ¹²C ratio about 0.5 to 0.8% below standard (δ¹³C about −0.5 to −0.8%), but an assessment made in 1995 concluded that the amount required to produce a reduction of about 1.0% worldwide requires eruptions greater by orders of magnitude than any for which evidence has been found.^[355] (However, this analysis addressed only CO₂ produced by the magma itself, not from interactions with carbon bearing sediments, as later proposed.)
• A reduction in organic activity would extract ¹²C more slowly from the environment and leave more of it to be incorporated into sediments, thus reducing the ¹³C ⁄ ¹²C ratio.
  Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) concluded that even transferring all the organic carbon (in organisms, soils, and dissolved in the ocean) into sediments would be insufficient: Even such a large burial of material rich in ¹²C would not have produced the 'smaller' drop in the ¹³C ⁄ ¹²C ratio of the rocks around the PETM.^[355]
• Buried sedimentary organic matter has a ¹³C ⁄ ¹²C ratio 2.0 to 2.5% below normal (δ¹³C −2.0 to −2.5%). Theoretically, if the sea level fell sharply, shallow marine sediments would be exposed to oxidation. But 6,500–8,400 gigatonnes (1 gigatonne = 10¹² kg) of organic carbon would have to be oxidized and returned to the ocean-atmosphere system within less than a few hundred thousand years to reduce the ¹³C ⁄ ¹²C ratio by 1.0%, which is not thought to be a realistic possibility.^[44] Moreover, sea levels were rising rather than falling at the time of the extinction.^[309]
• Rather than a sudden decline in sea level, intermittent periods of ocean-bottom
  anoxia (high-oxygen and low- or zero-oxygen conditions) may have caused the ¹³C ⁄ ¹²C ratio fluctuations in the Early Triassic;^[102] and global anoxia may have been responsible for the end-Permian blip. The continents of the end-Permian and early Triassic were more clustered in the tropics than they are now, and large tropical rivers would have dumped sediment into smaller, partially enclosed ocean basins at low latitudes. Such conditions favor oxic and anoxic episodes; oxic/anoxic conditions would result in a rapid release/burial, respectively, of large amounts of organic carbon, which has a low ¹³C ⁄ ¹²C ratio because biochemical processes use the lighter isotopes more.^[356] That or another organic-based reason may have been responsible for both that and a late Proterozoic/Cambrian pattern of fluctuating ¹³C ⁄ ¹²C ratios.^[102]

Prior to consideration of the inclusion of roasting carbonate sediments by volcanism, the only proposed mechanism sufficient to cause a global 1% reduction in the ¹³C ⁄ ¹²C ratio was the release of methane from methane clathrates.^[357][44] Carbon-cycle models confirm that it would have had enough effect to produce the observed reduction.^[29][358] It was also suggested that a large-scale release of methane and other greenhouse gases from the ocean into the atmosphere was connected to the anoxic events and euxinic (i.e. sulfidic) events at the time, with the exact mechanism compared to the 1986 Lake Nyos disaster.^[359]

The area covered by

methane hydrate deposits, and the lava caused the deposits to dissociate, releasing vast quantities of methane.^[360]

A vast release of methane might cause significant global warming since methane is a very powerful greenhouse gas. Strong evidence suggests the global temperatures increased by about 6 °C (10.8 °F) near the equator and therefore by more at higher latitudes: a sharp decrease in oxygen isotope ratios (¹⁸O ⁄ ¹⁶O);^[361] the extinction of Glossopteris flora (Glossopteris and plants that grew in the same areas), which needed a cold climate, with its replacement by floras typical of lower paleolatitudes.^[362]

However, the pattern of isotope shifts expected to result from a massive release of methane does not match the patterns seen throughout the Early Triassic. Not only would such a cause require the release of five times as much methane as postulated for the PETM, but would it also have to be reburied at an unrealistically high rate to account for the rapid increases in the ¹³C ⁄ ¹²C ratio (episodes of high positive δ¹³C) throughout the early Triassic before it was released several times again.^[102] The latest research suggests that greenhouse gas release during the extinction event was dominated by volcanic carbon dioxide,^[363] and while methane release had to have contributed, isotopic signatures show that thermogenic methane released from the Siberian Traps had consistently played a larger role than methane from clathrates and any other biogenic sources such as wetlands during the event.^[22] Adding to the evidence against methane clathrate release as the central driver of warming, the main rapid warming event is also associated with marine transgression rather than regression; the former would not normally have initiated methane release, which would have instead required a decrease in pressure, something that would be generated by a retreat of shallow seas.^[364] The configuration of the world's landmasses into one supercontinent would also mean that the global gas hydrate reservoir was lower than today, further damaging the case for methane clathrate dissolution as a major cause of the carbon cycle disruption.^[365]

Hypercapnia and acidification

Marine organisms are more sensitive to changes in CO₂ (carbon dioxide) levels than terrestrial organisms for a variety of reasons. CO₂ is 28 times more

Mathematical models of the Late Permian and Early Triassic atmospheres show a significant but protracted decline in atmospheric oxygen levels, with no acceleration near the P–Tr boundary. Minimum atmospheric oxygen levels in the Early Triassic are never less than present-day levels and so the decline in oxygen levels does not match the temporal pattern of the extinction.^[157]

In addition, an increase in CO₂ concentration is inevitably linked to ocean acidification,[367] consistent with the preferential extinction of heavily calcified taxa and other signals in the rock record that suggest a more acidic ocean.^[26] The decrease in ocean pH is calculated to be up to 0.7 units.^[25] Ocean acidification was most extreme at mid-latitudes, and the major marine transgression associated with the end-Permian extinction is believed to have devastated shallow shelf communities in conjunction with anoxia.^[3] Evidence from paralic facies spanning the Permian-Triassic boundary in western Guizhou and eastern Yunnan, however, shows a local marine transgression dominated by carbonate deposition, suggesting that ocean acidification did not occur across the entire globe and was likely limited to certain regions of the world's oceans.^[368] One study, published in Scientific Reports, concluded that widespread ocean acidification, if it did occur, was not intense enough to impede calcification and only occurred during the beginning of the extinction event.^[369] The relative success of many marine organisms that were very vulnerable to acidification has further been used to argue that acidification was not a major extinction contributor.^[370] The persistence of highly elevated carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere during the Early Triassic would have impeded the recovery of biocalcifying organisms after the PTME.^[371]

Acidity generated by increased carbon dioxide concentrations in soil and sulphur dioxide dissolution in rainwater was also a kill mechanism on land.^[372] The increasing acidification of rainwater caused increased soil erosion as a result of the increased acidity of forest soils, evidenced by the increased influx of terrestrially derived organic sediments found in marine sedimentary deposits during the end-Permian extinction.^[373] Further evidence of an increase in soil acidity comes from elevated Ba/Sr ratios in earliest Triassic soils.^[374] A positive feedback loop further enhancing and prolonging soil acidification may have resulted from the decline of infaunal invertebrates like tubificids and chironomids, which remove acid metabolites from the soil.^[375] The increased abundance of vermiculitic clays in Shansi, South China coinciding with the Permian-Triassic boundary strongly suggests a sharp drop in soil pH causally related to volcanogenic emissions of carbon dioxide and sulphur dioxide.^[376] Hopane anomalies have also been interpreted as evidence of acidic soils and peats.^[377] As with many other environmental stressors, acidity on land episodically persisted well into the Triassic, stunting the recovery of terrestrial ecosystems.^[378]

Anoxia and euxinia

See also: Anoxic event

Evidence for widespread ocean

Panthalassic Oceans, evidence for anoxia appears at the extinction event, including small pyrite framboids,^[382] negative δ²³⁸U excursions,^[383][384] negative δ¹⁵N excursions,^[385] positive δ^82/78Se isotope excursions,^[386] relatively positive δ¹³C ratios in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons,^[387] high Th/U ratios,^[383] positive Ce/Ce* anomalies,^[388] and fine laminations in sediments.^[382] However, evidence for anoxia precedes the extinction at some other sites, including Spiti, India,^[389] Shangsi, China,^[390] Meishan, China,^[391] Opal Creek, Alberta,^[392] and Kap Stosch, Greenland.^[393] Biogeochemical evidence also points to the presence of euxinia during the PTME.^[394] Biomarkers for green sulfur bacteria, such as isorenieratane, the diagenetic product of isorenieratene, are widely used as indicators of photic zone euxinia because green sulfur bacteria require both sunlight and hydrogen sulfide to survive. Their abundance in sediments from the P–T boundary indicates euxinic conditions were present even in the shallow waters of the photic zone.^[395] Negative mercury isotope excursions further bolster evidence for extensive euxinia during the PTME.^[396] The disproportionate extinction of high-latitude marine species provides further evidence for oxygen depletion as a killing mechanism; low-latitude species living in warmer, less oxygenated waters are naturally better adapted to lower levels of oxygen and are able to migrate to higher latitudes during periods of global warming, whereas high-latitude organisms are unable to escape from warming, hypoxic waters at the poles.^[397] Evidence of a lag between volcanic mercury inputs and biotic turnovers provides further support for anoxia and euxinia as the key killing mechanism, because extinctions would be expected to be synchronous with volcanic mercury discharge if volcanism and hypercapnia was the primary driver of extinction.^[398]

The sequence of events leading to anoxic oceans may have been triggered by carbon dioxide emissions from the eruption of the Siberian Traps.

sulfate-reducing bacteria to thrive, causing the production of large amounts of hydrogen sulfide in the anoxic ocean, turning it euxinic.^[399] In some regions, anoxia briefly disappeared when transient cold snaps resulting from volcanic sulphur emissions occurred.^[407]

This spread of toxic, oxygen-depleted water would have devastated marine life, causing widespread die-offs. Models of

ocean chemistry suggest that anoxia and euxinia were closely associated with hypercapnia (high levels of carbon dioxide).^[408] This suggests that poisoning from hydrogen sulfide, anoxia, and hypercapnia acted together as a killing mechanism. Hypercapnia best explains the selectivity of the extinction, but anoxia and euxinia probably contributed to the high mortality of the event. The persistence of anoxia through the Early Triassic may explain the slow recovery of marine life and low levels of biodiversity after the extinction,^{[409][410][411]} particularly that of benthic organisms.^[412][204] Anoxia disappeared from shallow waters more rapidly than the deep ocean.^[413] Reexpansions of oxygen-minimum zones did not cease until the late Spathian, periodically setting back and restarting the biotic recovery process.^[414] The decline in continental weathering towards the end of the Spathian at last began ameliorating marine life from recurrent anoxia.^[415] In some regions of Panthalassa, pelagic zone anoxia continued to recur as late as the Anisian,^[416] probably due to increased productivity and a return of aeolian upwelling.^[417] Some sections show a rather quick return to oxic water column conditions, however, so for how long anoxia persisted remains debated.^[418] The volatility of the Early Triassic sulphur cycle suggests marine life continued to face returns of euxinia as well.^[419]

Some scientists have challenged the anoxia hypothesis on the grounds that long-lasting anoxic conditions could not have been supported if Late Permian thermohaline ocean circulation conformed to the "thermal mode" characterised by cooling at high latitudes. Anoxia may have persisted under a "haline mode" in which circulation was driven by subtropical evaporation, although the "haline mode" is highly unstable and was unlikely to have represented Late Permian oceanic circulation.[420]

Oxygen depletion via extensive microbial blooms also played a role in the biological collapse of not just marine ecosystems but freshwater ones as well. Persistent lack of oxygen after the extinction event itself helped delay biotic recovery for much of the Early Triassic epoch.^[421]

Aridification

Increasing continental aridity, a trend well underway even before the PTME as a result of the coalescence of the supercontinent Pangaea, was drastically exacerbated by terminal Permian volcanism and global warming.^[422] The combination of global warming and drying generated an increased incidence of wildfires.^[423] Tropical coastal swamp floras such as those in South China may have been very detrimentally impacted by the increase in wildfires,^[150] though it is ultimately unclear if an increase in wildfires played a role in driving taxa to extinction.^[424]

Aridification trends varied widely in their tempo and regional impact. Analysis of the fossil river deposits of the floodplains of the Karoo Basin indicate a shift from meandering to braided river patterns, indicating a very abrupt drying of the climate.^[425] The climate change may have taken as little as 100,000 years, prompting the extinction of the unique Glossopteris flora and its associated herbivores, followed by the carnivorous guild.^[426] A pattern of aridity-induced extinctions that progressively ascended up the food chain has been deduced from Karoo Basin biostratigraphy.^[153] Evidence for aridification in the Karoo across the Permian-Triassic boundary is not, however, universal, as some palaeosol evidence indicates a wettening of the local climate during the transition between the two geologic periods.^[427] Evidence from the Sydney Basin of eastern Australia, on the other hand, suggests that the expansion of semi-arid and arid climatic belts across Pangaea was not immediate but was instead a gradual, prolonged process. Apart from the disappearance of peatlands, there was little evidence of significant sedimentological changes in depositional style across the Permian-Triassic boundary.^[428] Instead, a modest shift to amplified seasonality and hotter summers is suggested by palaeoclimatological models based on weathering proxies from the region's Late Permian and Early Triassic deposits.^[429] In the Kuznetsk Basin of southwestern Siberia, an increase in aridity led to the demise of the humid-adapted cordaites forests in the region a few hundred thousand years before the Permian-Triassic boundary. Drying of this basin has been attributed to a broader poleward shift of drier, more arid climates during the late Changhsingian before the more abrupt main phase of the extinction at the Permian-Triassic boundary that disproportionately affected tropical and subtropical species.^[144]

The persistence of hyperaridity varied regionally as well. In the North China Basin, highly arid climatic conditions are recorded during the latest Permian, near the Permian-Triassic boundary, with a swing towards increased precipitation during the Early Triassic, the latter likely assisting biotic recovery following the mass extinction.^[267][266] Elsewhere, such as in the Karoo Basin, episodes of dry climate recurred regularly in the Early Triassic, with profound effects on terrestrial tetrapods.^[422]

The types and diversity of ichnofossils in a locality has been used as an indicator measuring aridity. Nurra, an ichnofossil site on the island of Sardinia, shows evidence of major drought-related stress among crustaceans. Whereas the Permian subnetwork at Nurra displays extensive horizontal backfilled traces and high ichnodiversity, the Early Triassic subnetwork is characterised by an absence of backfilled traces, an ichnological sign of aridification.^[430]

Ozone depletion

A collapse of the atmospheric ozone shield has been invoked as an explanation for the mass extinction,

ultraviolet radiation, which would have been more intense after hydrogen sulfide emissions weakened the ozone layer.^[433][38] Malformed plant spores from the time of the extinction event show an increase in ultraviolet B absorbing compounds, confirming that increased ultraviolet radiation played a role in the environmental catastrophe and excluding other possible causes of mutagenesis, such as heavy metal toxicity, in these mutated spores.^[36]

Multiple mechanisms could have reduced the ozone shield and rendered it ineffective. Computer modelling shows high atmospheric methane levels are associated with ozone shield decline and may have contributed to its reduction during the PTME.

Chlorobiaceae (green sulfur bacteria) from the Late-Permian into the Early Triassic indicates that hydrogen sulphide did upwell into shallow waters because these bacteria are restricted to the photic zone and use sulfide as an electron donor.^[437]

Asteroid impact

Evidence that an

impact craters of the appropriate age, however, suggestions that an asteroid impact was the trigger of the Permian-Triassic extinction are now largely rejected.^[438]

Reported evidence for an impact event from the P–Tr boundary level includes rare grains of

plastic deformation, consistent with formation in a tectonic environment such as volcanism.^[448] Iridium levels in many sites straddling the Permian-Triassic boundaries are not anomalous, providing evidence against an extraterrestrial impact as the PTME's cause.^[449]

An impact crater on the seafloor would be evidence of a possible cause of the P–Tr extinction, but such a crater would by now have disappeared. As 70% of the Earth's surface is currently sea, an

siderophilic elements (such as iridium

) would be expected in formations from the time.

A large impact might have triggered other mechanisms of extinction described above,[309] such as the Siberian Traps eruptions at either an impact site^[451] or the antipode of an impact site.^[309][452] The abruptness of an impact also explains why more species did not rapidly evolve to survive, as would be expected if the Permian–Triassic event had been slower and less global than a meteorite impact.

Bolide impact claims have been criticised on the grounds that they are unnecessary as explanations for the extinctions, and they do not fit the known data compatible with a protracted extinction spanning thousands of years.^[453] Additionally, many sites spanning the Permian-Triassic boundary display a complete lack of evidence of an impact event.^[454]

Possible impact sites

Possible impact craters proposed as the site of an impact causing the P–Tr extinction include the 250 km (160 mi) Bedout structure off the northwest coast of Australia^[440] and the hypothesized 480 km (300 mi) Wilkes Land crater of East Antarctica.^[455][456] An impact has not been proved in either case, and the idea has been widely criticized. The Wilkes Land geophysical feature is of very uncertain age, possibly later than the Permian–Triassic extinction.

Another impact hypothesis postulates that the impact event which formed the Araguainha crater, whose formation has been dated to 254.7 ± 2.5 million, a possible temporal range overlapping with the end-Permian extinction,^[33] precipitated the mass extinction.^[457] The impact occurred around extensive deposits of oil shale in the shallow marine Paraná–Karoo Basin, whose perturbation by the seismicity resulting from impact likely discharged about 1.6 teratonnes of methane into Earth's atmosphere, buttressing the already rapid warming caused by hydrocarbon release due to the Siberian Traps.^[34] The large earthquakes generated by the impact would have additionally generated massive tsunamis across much of the globe.^[457][35] Despite this, most palaeontologists reject the impact as being a significant driver of the extinction, citing the relatively low energy (equivalent to 10⁵ to 10⁶ of TNT, around two orders of magnitude lower than the impact energy believed to be required to induce mass extinctions) released by the impact.^[34]

A 2017 paper noted the discovery of a circular gravity anomaly near the Falkland Islands which might correspond to an impact crater with a diameter of 250 km (160 mi),^[458] as supported by seismic and magnetic evidence. Estimates for the age of the structure range up to 250 million years old. This would be substantially larger than the well-known 180 km (110 mi) Chicxulub impact crater associated with a later extinction. However, Dave McCarthy and colleagues from the British Geological Survey illustrated that the gravity anomaly is not circular and also that the seismic data presented by Rocca, Rampino and Baez Presser did not cross the proposed crater or provide any evidence for an impact crater.^[459]

Methanogens

A hypothesis published in 2014 posits that a genus of

gene transfer at about that time, enabling them to efficiently metabolize acetate into methane. That would have led to their exponential reproduction, allowing them to rapidly consume vast deposits of organic carbon that had accumulated in the marine sediment. The result would have been a sharp buildup of methane and carbon dioxide in the Earth's oceans and atmosphere, in a manner that may be consistent with the ¹³C/¹²C isotopic record. Massive volcanism facilitated this process by releasing large amounts of nickel, a scarce metal which is a cofactor for enzymes involved in producing methane.^[31] Chemostratigraphic analysis of Permian-Triassic boundary sediments in Chaotian demonstrates a methanogenic burst could be responsible for some percentage of the carbon isotopic fluctuations.^[32] On the other hand, in the canonical Meishan sections, the nickel concentration increases somewhat after the δ¹³C concentrations have begun to fall.^[460]

Supercontinent Pangaea

In the mid-Permian (during the

epoch), Earth's major continental plates joined, forming a supercontinent called Pangaea, which was surrounded by the superocean, Panthalassa

.

Oceanic circulation and atmospheric weather patterns during the mid-Permian produced seasonal monsoons near the coasts and an arid climate in the vast continental interior.^[461]

As the supercontinent formed, the ecologically diverse and productive coastal areas shrank. The shallow aquatic environments were eliminated and exposed formerly protected organisms of the rich continental shelves to increased environmental volatility.

Pangaea's formation depleted marine life at near catastrophic rates. However, Pangaea's effect on land extinctions is thought to have been smaller. In fact, the advance of the

therapsids

and increase in their diversity is attributed to the late Permian, when Pangaea's global effect was thought to have peaked.

While Pangaea's formation initiated a long period of marine extinction, its impact on the "Great Dying" and the end of the Permian is uncertain.

Interstellar dust

dusty gas clouds may have caused a dimming of the Sun, which combined with the effect of Pangaea to produce an ice age.^[462]

Comparison to present global warming

The PTME has been compared to the current

anthropogenic global warming situation and Holocene extinction due to sharing the common characteristic of rapid rates of carbon dioxide release. Though the current rate of greenhouse gas emissions is more than an order of magnitude greater than the rate measured over the course of the PTME, the discharge of greenhouse gases during the PTME is poorly constrained geo-chronologically and was most likely pulsed and constrained to a few key, short intervals, rather than continuously occurring at a constant rate for the whole extinction interval; the rate of carbon release within these intervals was likely to have been similar in timing to modern anthropogenic emissions.^[304] As they did during the PTME, oceans in the present day are experiencing drops in pH and in oxygen levels, prompting further comparisons between modern anthropogenic ecological conditions and the PTME.^[463] Another biocalcification event similar in its effects on modern marine ecosystems is predicted to occur if carbon dioxide levels continue to rise.^[371] The similarities between the two extinction events have led to warnings from geologists about the urgent need for reducing carbon dioxide emissions if an event similar to the PTME is to be prevented from occurring.^[304]

See also

• Carbon dioxide
• Extinction event
• Climate change
• List of possible impact structures on Earth
• Silurian hypothesis

References

1. ^
   S2CID 32520208
   . Retrieved 14 January 2023.
2. doi:10.3389/feart.2020.600976
   .
3. ^
   doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.06.014
   . Retrieved 2024-03-26.
4. PMID 36473862
   .
5. ^
   S2CID 226405085
   .
6. ^ ""Great Dying" lasted 200,000 years". National Geographic. 23 November 2011. Archived from the original on November 24, 2011. Retrieved 1 April 2014.
7. ^ St. Fleur, Nicholas (16 February 2017). "After Earth's worst mass extinction, life rebounded rapidly, fossils suggest". The New York Times. Retrieved 17 February 2017.
8. ^ Algeo, Thomas J. (5 February 2012). "The P–T Extinction was a Slow Death". Astrobiology Magazine. Archived from the original on 2021-03-08.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
9. ^
   S2CID 224783993
   . Retrieved 8 November 2020.
10. ^
    doi:10.1146/annurev.es.21.110190.000441
    .
11. ^
    S2CID 135139479
    . Retrieved 28 October 2022.
12. PMID 27698119
    .
13. ^
    ISBN 978-0-500-28573-2
    .
14. ISBN 978-0-393-92592-0
    .
15. ^
    PMID 18198148
    .
16. ^
    doi:10.1093/ae/51.1.14
17. S2CID 255710815
    .
18. ^
    PMID 10903200
    . Retrieved 5 March 2023.
19. ^
    PMID 26601239
    .
20. S2CID 240076553
    .
21. ^
    doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.04.007
    .
22. ^
    S2CID 233200774
    . Retrieved 2024-03-26.
23. ^
    S2CID 236381390
    . Retrieved 2024-03-26.
24. ^
    doi:10.1130/G32707.1
    . Retrieved 2024-03-26.
25. ^
    S2CID 28891777
    .
26. ^
    PMID 20421502
    .
27. ^
    S2CID 3312150
    .
28. ^
    PMID 22184229
    .
29. ^ ^{a b c} Berner, R.A. (2002). "Examination of hypotheses for the Permo-Triassic boundary extinction by carbon cycle modeling".
    PMID 11917102
    .
30. ^
    ISSN 0091-7613. Available under CC BY 4.0
    .
31. ^
    PMID 24706773. – Lay summary: Chandler, David L. (March 31, 2014). "Ancient whodunit may be solved: Methane-producing microbes did it!"
    . Science Daily.
32. ^
    doi:10.3389/feart.2020.596178
    .
33. ^
    doi:10.1016/j.gca.2012.03.005
    .
34. ^
    doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.07.010
    . Retrieved 2024-03-26.
35. ^
    doi:10.1130/B31626.1
    . Retrieved 2024-03-26.
36. ^
    PMID 36608140
    .
37. ^
    PMID 29441357
    .
38. ^
    PMID 15282373
    .
39. PMID 36758082
    .
40. PMID 28246643
    .
41. ^
    S2CID 35498132
    .
42. ^
    PMID 17919771
    .
43. ^
    doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1996)108<0195:GCGBPT>2.3.CO;2
    .
44. ^
    ISBN 978-0-231-07467-4
    .
45. doi:10.18814/epiiugs/2001/v24i2/004
    .
46. ISBN 978-0-521-54573-0
    . Retrieved 3 July 2023.
47. ^
    PMID 24516148
    .
48. doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2014.03.026
    . Retrieved 10 August 2023.
49. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1989)017<0337:CMFEEA>2.3.CO;2
    .
50. doi:10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00398-3
    . Retrieved 3 July 2023.
51. doi:10.1016/S0009-2541(00)00368-5
    .
52. doi:10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.01.005
    . Retrieved 26 June 2023.
53. ISSN 0031-0182
    . Retrieved 20 September 2023.
54. S2CID 134060610
    . Retrieved 20 September 2023.
55. ^ "Daily CO₂". Mauna Loa Observatory.
56. ^
    PMID 11607638
    .
57. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.08.018
    . Retrieved 26 May 2023.
58. doi:10.2113/0260035
    .
59. doi:10.1016/j.revpalbo.2010.09.003
    . Retrieved 8 January 2023.
60. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.06.028
    .
61. ^
    PMID 11427710
    . See image 2
62. ^
    S2CID 46198018
    .
63. doi:10.1130/B25215.1
    .
64. doi:10.1130/G30096A.1
    .
65. doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2017.06.005
    . Retrieved 24 December 2022.
66. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.06.003
    . Retrieved 20 September 2023.
67. S2CID 129653925
    . Retrieved 20 September 2023.
68. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.06.005
    . Retrieved 29 October 2022.
69. ISSN 0091-7613
    .
70. PMID 33758284
    .
71. S2CID 252697822
    . Retrieved 20 April 2023.
72. S2CID 2729020
    .
73. S2CID 247514266
    .
74. S2CID 257186215
    .
75. ^
    ISSN 0091-7613
    .
76. S2CID 970244
    . Retrieved 26 May 2023.
77. doi:10.1016/j.gr.2014.09.002
    . Retrieved 31 May 2023.
78. S2CID 247013868
    . Retrieved 20 December 2022.
79. S2CID 250417358
    . Retrieved 24 November 2023.
80. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.10.007
    . Retrieved 10 August 2023.
81. S2CID 129258297
    .
82. S2CID 256920630
    .
83. PMID 38295161
    .
84. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.03.056
    .
85. ^
    doi:10.1130/B26011.1
    .
86. arXiv:1212.4229 [q-bio.PE
    ].
87. S2CID 39256134
    .
88. doi:10.1016/j.jseaes.2005.04.001
    .
89. S2CID 35611701
    .
90. doi:10.1080/002411600750053853
    .
91. doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(99)00089-9
    .
92. S2CID 17279135
    .
93. ^ ^{a b} Knoll AH (2004). "Biomineralization and evolutionary history". In Dove PM, DeYoreo JJ, Weiner S (eds.). Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-06-20.
94. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2022.111362
    . Retrieved 20 February 2023.
95. S2CID 256801383
    .
96. S2CID 83713101
    . Retrieved 2008-05-13.
97. S2CID 86014119
    .
98. S2CID 13473769
    .
99. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.03.036
    . Retrieved 19 December 2022.
100. ^ "Permian: The Marine Realm and The End-Permian Extinction". paleobiology.si.edu. Retrieved 2016-01-26.
101. ^ ^{a b} "Permian extinction". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 2016-01-26.
102. ^
     S2CID 35498132
     .
103. S2CID 35958753
     .
104. S2CID 86843206
     .
105. S2CID 17304091
     .
106. S2CID 83650272
     .
107. S2CID 85986762
     . Retrieved 3 July 2023.
108. ^
     doi:10.5852/ejt.2012.19
     . Retrieved 3 July 2023.
109. ISSN 0091-7613
     . Retrieved 30 December 2023.
110. S2CID 128751510
     . Retrieved 31 May 2023.
111. S2CID 130765890
     . Retrieved 23 March 2023.
112. S2CID 130620805
     . Retrieved 23 March 2023.
113. S2CID 205320689
     .
114. S2CID 257498390
     .
115. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.11.038
     . Retrieved 13 January 2023.
116. S2CID 18552375
     . Retrieved 13 January 2023.
117. S2CID 224855811
     .
118. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.10.036
     . Retrieved 13 January 2023.
119. S2CID 17284750
     . Retrieved 23 March 2023.
120. S2CID 23096333
     . Retrieved 13 January 2023.
121. S2CID 134806479
     . Retrieved 13 January 2023.
122. hdl:10536/DRO/DU:30080099
     .
123. S2CID 253368808
     . Retrieved 13 January 2023.
124. PMID 22319562
     .
125. S2CID 213294384
     . Retrieved 13 January 2023.
126. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.06.003
     . Retrieved 13 January 2023.
127. S2CID 140198533
     . Retrieved 23 May 2023.
128. S2CID 7367192
     . Retrieved 23 March 2023.
129. doi:10.1130/G30553.1
     . Retrieved 13 January 2023.
130. doi:10.1130/G31614C.1
     .
131. doi:10.1130/G31765Y.1
     .
132. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.03.005
     . Retrieved 20 January 2023.
133. S2CID 134070316
     . Retrieved 20 January 2023.
134. ^
     PMID 11536548
     .
135. ISBN 978-0-470-85361-0
     .
136. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0827:LPDATE>2.0.CO;2
     . Retrieved 31 May 2023.
137. ^
     PMID 30674875
     .
138. ^ "The Dino Directory – Natural History Museum".
139. PMID 35610472
     .
140. S2CID 42308183
     .
141. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.2011.00262.x
     .
142. ^
     S2CID 233810158
     . Retrieved 24 December 2022.
143. ^
     doi:10.1016/j.revpalbo.2005.09.007
     . Retrieved 24 December 2022.
144. ^
     S2CID 235530804
     . Retrieved 19 December 2022.
145. S2CID 240118558
     . Retrieved 28 March 2023.
146. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.07.002
     . Retrieved 20 January 2023.
147. hdl:1983/2d475883-42ea-4988-b01c-0a56912e6aec
     . Retrieved 12 November 2022.
148. ^
     S2CID 216433847
     .
149. S2CID 224900905
     . Retrieved 21 December 2022.
150. ^
     S2CID 214468383
     .
151. S2CID 56582195
     .
152. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<1147:POVEAA>2.0.CO;2
     . Retrieved 23 May 2023.
153. ^
     doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.01.002
     . Retrieved 23 May 2023.
154. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.06.027
     .
155. ^ Maxwell, W.D. (1992). "Permian and Early Triassic extinction of non-marine tetrapods". Palaeontology. 35: 571–583.
156. ^ "Bristol University – News – 2008: Mass extinction".
157. ^
     doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2007.02.018
     . Retrieved 13 December 2021.
158. doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2005.07.005
     . Retrieved 26 May 2023.
159. doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2006.04.006
     . Retrieved 26 May 2023.
160. S2CID 85595559
     .
161. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2007.02.003
     . Retrieved 2 April 2023.
162. ^
     PMID 17664426
     .
163. S2CID 5332637
     .
164. PMID 24647136
     .
165. S2CID 131144468
     . Retrieved 6 November 2022.
166. S2CID 132467749
     .
167. PMID 11344284
     .
168. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.04.008
     .
169. S2CID 84457522
     .
170. doi:10.1093/mollus/eyx018
     .
171. S2CID 251174662
     . Retrieved 26 May 2023.
172. ^
     S2CID 88450377
     . Retrieved 23 March 2023.
173. ISSN 0921-8181
     . Retrieved 24 November 2023.
174. S2CID 32920409
     . Retrieved 23 March 2023.
175. S2CID 233858016
     . Retrieved 24 November 2023.
176. doi:10.1016/0031-0182(94)00093-N
     . Retrieved 2 April 2023.
177. ^ "It took Earth ten million years to recover from greatest mass extinction". ScienceDaily. 27 May 2012. Retrieved 28 May 2012.
178. ^
     PMID 28246643
     .
179. PMID 34608207
     .
180. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2011.07.014
     . Retrieved 20 December 2022.
181. S2CID 256738043
     . Retrieved 23 February 2023.
182. S2CID 256697946
     .
183. doi:10.1016/j.geobios.2010.07.004
     . Retrieved 2 April 2023.
184. doi:10.1080/0024116051003150
     . Retrieved 8 April 2023.
185. PMID 35585069
     .
186. ISSN 0091-7613
     . Retrieved 24 November 2023.
187. ^
     doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.05.014
     . Retrieved 20 December 2022.
188. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.06.002
     . Retrieved 2 April 2023.
189. PMID 30324133
     .
190. S2CID 6247479
     .
191. S2CID 250114146
     .
192. S2CID 1287762
     .
193. doi:10.1038/ngeo1475
     . Retrieved 28 March 2023.
194. S2CID 140688908
     .
195. ^
     S2CID 135442906
     . Retrieved 8 April 2023.
196. PMID 34322318
     .
197. doi:10.1016/j.palwor.2007.05.013
     . Retrieved 3 July 2023.
198. PMID 19721005
     .
199. ISSN 0031-0182
     . Retrieved 24 November 2023.
200. S2CID 225301237
     . Retrieved 24 November 2023.
201. S2CID 134149088
     . Retrieved 2 December 2022.
202. ^
     S2CID 252708876
     . Retrieved 20 April 2023.
203. S2CID 207103048
     . Retrieved 20 April 2023.
204. ^
     S2CID 35032406
     .
205. doi:10.1111/let.12121
     .
206. PMID 28296886
     .
207. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2015.08.001
     . Retrieved 2 April 2023.
208. S2CID 134192673
     .
209. S2CID 208555999
     .
210. S2CID 27430390
     .
211. ^
     S2CID 26957610
     .
212. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.01.029
     . Retrieved 24 November 2023.
213. S2CID 134649495
     . Retrieved 2 April 2023.
214. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.03.011
     . Retrieved 6 November 2022.
215. PMID 37689772
     . Retrieved 24 November 2023.
216. ^
     doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.08.019
     . Retrieved 2 April 2023.
217. ^ Clapham ME, Bottjer DJ, Shen S (2006). "Decoupled diversity and ecology during the end-Guadalupian extinction (late Permian)". Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. 38 (7): 117. Archived from the original on 2015-12-08. Retrieved 28 March 2008.
218. ISSN 0091-7613
     . Retrieved 20 September 2023.
219. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.01.028
     . Retrieved 14 January 2023.
220. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.09.049
     . Retrieved 3 July 2023.
221. S2CID 128441580
     .
222. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.05.020
     . Retrieved 26 June 2023.
223. doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(02)00507-2
     . Retrieved 18 April 2023.
224. S2CID 128739624
     . Retrieved 23 May 2023.
225. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.01.006
     . Retrieved 23 May 2023.
226. S2CID 128700856
     . Retrieved 23 May 2023.
227. S2CID 130929034
     . Retrieved 30 December 2023.
228. S2CID 85586709
     .
229. doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2005.02.006
     . Retrieved 2 April 2023.
230. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.36.031207.124116
     .
231. PMID 29410858
     .
232. PMID 31531267
     .
233. ISSN 1367-9120
     . Retrieved 24 November 2023.
234. S2CID 53364944
     . Retrieved 24 November 2023.
235. ISSN 1367-9120
     . Retrieved 24 November 2023.
236. ISSN 0035-1598
     . Retrieved 24 November 2023.
237. doi:10.1038/ngeo1264
     . Retrieved 8 May 2023.
238. ^
     doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.05.015
     . Retrieved 8 May 2023.
239. S2CID 219090219
     . Retrieved 24 November 2023.
240. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.11.056
     . Retrieved 8 May 2023.
241. ^
     S2CID 135338869
     . Retrieved 2 December 2022.
242. S2CID 247491746
     . Retrieved 8 May 2023.
243. doi:10.3389/feart.2021.586210
     .
244. S2CID 129651368
     . Retrieved 20 September 2023.
245. S2CID 134828705
     . Retrieved 20 February 2023.
246. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.04.045
     . Retrieved 8 May 2023.
247. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.04.008
     . Retrieved 20 January 2023.
248. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.09.004
     . Retrieved 20 January 2023.
249. S2CID 128837115
     . Retrieved 20 January 2023.
250. S2CID 128722898
     . Retrieved 20 January 2023.
251. S2CID 210169203
     . Retrieved 8 April 2023.
252. S2CID 229416157
     . Retrieved 20 January 2023.
253. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2021.103621
     .
254. PMID 27340926
     .
255. PMID 10570163
     .
256. ^
     doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.10.004
     . Retrieved 24 December 2022.
257. doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2005.07.002
     . Retrieved 24 December 2022.
258. ^
     S2CID 251031028. Archived from the original on 14 January 2023. Retrieved 26 June 2023.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link
     )
259. ^
     S2CID 234074046
     .
260. S2CID 225585090
     .
261. doi:10.1016/j.gr.2011.01.008
     . Retrieved 31 May 2023.
262. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1999)111<0052:PGPRBE>2.3.CO;2
     . Retrieved 31 May 2023.
263. doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(01)00413-8
     .
264. S2CID 244900399
     . Retrieved 31 May 2023.
265. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2021.103618
     . Retrieved 10 August 2023.
266. ^
     doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2022.103914
     .
267. ^
     S2CID 239498183
     . Retrieved 6 November 2022.
268. S2CID 4388173
     . Retrieved 31 May 2023.
269. S2CID 249186414
     . Retrieved 8 January 2023.
270. PMID 23630295
     .
271. doi:10.3389/feart.2020.610463
     .
272. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.08.015
     . Retrieved 31 May 2023.
273. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00601.x
     .
274. PMID 27044713
     .
275. S2CID 20557454
     . Retrieved 31 May 2023.
276. S2CID 133781923
     .
277. ^
     PMID 24498335
     .
278. PMID 28716184
     .
279. S2CID 109228166
     . Retrieved 31 May 2023.
280. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.2007.00011.x. Archived from the original
     (PDF) on 2008-09-10. Retrieved 2008-07-02.
281. S2CID 129242450
     . Retrieved 31 May 2023.
282. PMID 24765566
     .
283. PMID 37126508
     .
284. ISBN 978-0-632-05614-9
     .
285. doi:10.1093/icb/40.4.585
     .
286. S2CID 222247711
     .
287. ProQuest 1030963218
     . Retrieved 20 September 2023.
288. ^
     S2CID 85411546
     .
289. ISSN 0031-0182
     . Retrieved 24 November 2023.
290. S2CID 53234826
     . Retrieved 31 May 2023.
291. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2000.tb00650.x
     .
292. S2CID 254207982
     . Retrieved 8 April 2023.
293. ^
     hdl:1983/95966174-157e-4814-b73f-6901ff9b9bf8
     . Retrieved 23 December 2022.
294. S2CID 202194000
     .
295. ^ Andy Saunders; Marc Reichow (2009). "The Siberian Traps – area and volume". Retrieved 2009-10-18.
296. ^ "Largest Countries in the World (by area)". 2023. Retrieved 2023-05-25.
297. S2CID 1736350
     .
298. hdl:2381/4204
     .
299. PMID 31822688
     .
300. doi:10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00347-9
     .
301. ISSN 0016-7606
     .
302. ^ Fischman, Josh. Giant eruptions and giant extinctions. Scientific American (video). Retrieved 2016-03-11.
303. S2CID 134521010
     . Retrieved 20 February 2023.
304. ^
     PMID 35878029
     .
305. S2CID 254660567
     .
306. S2CID 206519019
     . Retrieved 20 February 2023.
307. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.06.009
     . Retrieved 19 December 2022.
308. doi:10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00608-2
     . Retrieved 20 February 2023.
309. ^
     S2CID 18078072. Archived from the original
     (PDF) on 2020-11-11. Retrieved 2008-01-12.
310. S2CID 197561486
     . Retrieved 26 May 2023.
311. PMID 29340852
     .
312. doi:10.1016/j.gr.2013.07.019
     . Retrieved 31 May 2023.
313. S2CID 52152614
     .
314. S2CID 247298020
     . Retrieved 31 May 2023.
315. ^ "Driver of the largest mass extinction in the history of the Earth identified". phys.org. Retrieved 8 November 2020.
316. ^ "Large volcanic eruption caused the largest mass extinction". phys.org. Retrieved 8 December 2020.
317. S2CID 204262451
     . Retrieved 26 May 2023.
318. ISSN 1525-2027
     . Retrieved 13 March 2024.
319. doi:10.1130/G38644.1
     . Retrieved 28 March 2023.
320. ^
     S2CID 133833819
     . Retrieved 28 March 2023.
321. S2CID 205226146
     . Retrieved 20 September 2023.
322. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.06.015
     . Retrieved 5 March 2023.
323. PMID 28262815
     .
324. doi:10.1016/S0012-821X(02)01087-7
     . Retrieved 31 May 2023.
325. ^ "Volcanism". Hooper Museum. hoopermuseum.earthsci.carleton.ca. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Carleton University.
326. doi:10.1130/G47365.1
     .
327. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2008.11.015
     . Retrieved 13 January 2023.
328. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2014.03.029
     .
329. PMID 36371500
     .
330. PMID 32528009
     .
331. ^ Verango, Dan (24 January 2011). "Ancient mass extinction tied to torched coal". USA Today.
332. doi:10.1038/ngeo1069
     .
333. ^ "Researchers find smoking gun of world's biggest extinction: Massive volcanic eruption, burning coal and accelerated greenhouse gas choked out life" (Press release). University of Calgary. January 23, 2011. Retrieved 26 January 2011.
334. hdl:10871/20251
     . Retrieved 31 May 2023.
335. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.08.031
     .
336. ISSN 0031-0182
     . Retrieved 12 January 2024 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
337. PMID 36596767
     .
338. ^
     doi:10.1130/B31197.1
     . Retrieved 14 January 2023.
339. S2CID 85549730
     .
340. doi:10.1130/G32596.1
     . Retrieved 14 January 2023.
341. S2CID 219495628
     .
342. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.05.022
     . Retrieved 31 May 2023.
343. PMID 28223492
     .
344. PMID 28963524
     .
345. PMID 33795666
     .
346. doi:10.1016/j.gr.2012.10.002
     . Retrieved 26 May 2023.
347. S2CID 135330761
     . Retrieved 13 November 2022.
348. PMID 35717338
     .
349. S2CID 135130436
     .
350. ISSN 0718-7106
     . Retrieved 20 September 2023.
351. ^
     S2CID 230524628
     . Retrieved 28 March 2023.
352. PMID 34788084
     .
353. doi:10.1016/S0146-6380(01)00086-9
     .
354. ^ Palfy J, Demeny A, Haas J, Htenyi M, Orchard MJ, Veto I (2001). "Carbon isotope anomaly at the Triassic–Jurassic boundary from a marine section in Hungary".
     ISSN 0091-7613
     .
355. ^
     doi:10.1029/95PA02087
     .
356. doi:10.1029/2001GC000219
     . Preliminary abstract at Schrag, D.P. (June 2001). "On the initiation of a snowball Earth". Geological Society of America. Archived from the original on 2018-04-25. Retrieved 2008-04-20.
357. ISSN 0016-7606
     . Retrieved 3 July 2023.
358. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00093-4
     .
359. doi:10.1130/G19518.1
     .
360. S2CID 28964473
     .
361. S2CID 8035040
     .
362. doi:10.1016/0031-0182(87)90007-1
     .
363. PMID 34493684
     .
364. doi:10.1016/j.palwor.2006.03.005
     . Retrieved 26 May 2023.
365. ISSN 0012-821X
     . Retrieved 12 January 2024 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
366. S2CID 211074044
     . Retrieved 26 March 2023.
367. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.09.001
     . Retrieved 26 June 2023.
368. S2CID 216302513
     .
369. PMID 35075151
     .
370. ISBN 978-0-691-14209-8
     .
371. ^
     doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.11.041
     . Retrieved 31 May 2023.
372. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2008.04.013
     . Retrieved 26 May 2023.
373. hdl:10044/1/31566
     . Retrieved 23 December 2022.
374. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.09.001
     . Retrieved 24 April 2023.
375. S2CID 233616369
     . Retrieved 23 December 2022.
376. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.07.036
     . Retrieved 23 December 2022.
377. doi:10.1016/j.orggeochem.2006.08.014
     . Retrieved 23 May 2023.
378. S2CID 134704729
     . Retrieved 18 December 2022.
379. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2023.111569
     . Retrieved 31 May 2023.
380. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2012.07.005
     . Retrieved 13 January 2023.
381. S2CID 240076553
     . Retrieved 8 January 2023.
382. ^
     OL 11351081M
     . Retrieved 17 February 2024.
383. ^
     PMID 21987794
     .
384. S2CID 250941149
     . Retrieved 31 May 2023.
385. doi:10.1130/G32024.1
     . Retrieved 26 May 2023.
386. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.05.021
     . Retrieved 13 March 2024 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
387. doi:10.1016/j.orggeochem.2007.07.001
     . Retrieved 31 May 2023.
388. S2CID 256800036
     . Retrieved 26 June 2023.
389. S2CID 134724104
     .
390. S2CID 224881713
     . Retrieved 2 March 2023.
391. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2009.02.012
     .
392. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2011.10.019
     . Retrieved 21 December 2022.
393. hdl:20.500.11937/26597
     .
394. doi:10.1016/j.palwor.2007.05.008
     . Retrieved 23 May 2023.
395. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2016.12.015
     . Retrieved 4 January 2023.
396. S2CID 258577845
     .
397. S2CID 54456989
     .
398. PMID 30952859
     .
399. ^
     S2CID 131273374
     . Retrieved 26 May 2023.
400. doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(03)00667-9
     . Retrieved 23 May 2023.
401. doi:10.1130/G21784.1
     . Retrieved 26 May 2023.
402. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.02.008
     . Retrieved 3 July 2023.
403. ISSN 0091-7613
     .
404. S2CID 221146234
     . Retrieved 8 January 2023.
405. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.11.012
     . Retrieved 8 May 2023.
406. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2010.09.001
     . Retrieved 24 April 2023.
407. S2CID 236780878
     . Retrieved 27 December 2023.
408. doi:10.1130/g24618a.1
     .
409. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.11.002
     . Retrieved 20 January 2023.
410. doi:10.1016/0031-0182(92)90182-5
     . Retrieved 20 January 2023.
411. hdl:1983/d2b89cc3-b0a8-41b5-a220-b3d7d75687e0
     . Retrieved 14 January 2023.
412. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.02.011
     . Retrieved 2 April 2023.
413. ISSN 0031-0182
     . Retrieved 24 November 2023.
414. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.07.018
     . Retrieved 8 May 2023.
415. ISSN 0012-821X
     . Retrieved 24 November 2023.
416. ISSN 0031-0182
     . Retrieved 24 November 2023.
417. ISSN 2296-6463
     .
418. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.09.050
     . Retrieved 26 May 2023.
419. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.02.025
     . Retrieved 26 May 2023.
420. doi:10.1029/2000PA000522
     .
421. PMID 34535650
     .
422. ^
     S2CID 251781291
     . Retrieved 23 May 2023.
423. S2CID 249857664
     . Retrieved 23 May 2023.
424. doi:10.1016/j.gr.2012.12.010
     . Retrieved 26 May 2023.
425. doi:10.1016/0031-0182(94)00119-S
     .
426. ISBN 978-0-253-35697-0
     .
427. S2CID 221865490
     . Retrieved 31 May 2023.
428. S2CID 225605914
     . Retrieved 30 October 2022.
429. PMID 30674880
     .
430. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.05.034
     . Retrieved 8 April 2023.
431. S2CID 131750128
     . Retrieved 26 May 2023.
432. PMID 30177561
     .
433. ^
     S2CID 128829042
     . Retrieved 26 May 2023.
434. doi:10.1029/2006PA001276
     .
435. doi:10.1130/G34875.1
     . Retrieved 31 May 2023.
436. S2CID 55812439
     .
437. doi:10.1130/G21295.1
     . Retrieved 2 April 2023.
438. PMID 38116094
     .
439. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1998)026<0979:SFEOIA>2.3.CO;2
     .
     
440. ^
     S2CID 17927307
     .
441. S2CID 45230096
     .
442. S2CID 15912467
     .
443. ISSN 0091-7613
     .
444. PMID 11577203
     .
445. ISSN 0091-7613
     .
446. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1999)027<0859:SFEOIA>2.3.CO;2
     .
447. doi:10.1130/G20907.1
     .
448. ^ Langenhorst F, Kyte FT, Retallack GJ (2005). "Reexamination of quartz grains from the Permian–Triassic boundary section at Graphite Peak, Antarctica" (PDF). Lunar and Planetary Science Conference XXXVI. Retrieved 2007-07-13.
449. doi:10.1016/0012-821X(88)90139-2
     . Retrieved 31 May 2023.
450. doi:10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00824-5
     .
451. ^ AHager, Bradford H. (2001). "Giant Impact Craters Lead To Flood Basalts: A Viable Model". CCNet 33/2001: Abstract 50470. Archived from the original on 2008-04-22. Retrieved 2008-04-06.
452. ^ Hagstrum, Jonathan T. (2001). "Large Oceanic Impacts As The Cause Of Antipodal Hotspots And Global Mass Extinctions". CCNet 33/2001: Abstract 50288. Archived from the original on 2008-04-22. Retrieved 2008-04-06.
453. S2CID 225066013
     . Retrieved 4 January 2023.
454. S2CID 134324242
     . Retrieved 2 April 2023.
455. Bibcode:2006AGUSM.T41A..08V
     .
456. ISSN 1525-2027
     .
457. ^ ^{a b} "Biggest extinction in history caused by climate-changing meteor". University News (Press release). University of Western Australia. 31 July 2013.
458. S2CID 134484465
     .
459. S2CID 133781924
     . Retrieved 26 March 2023.
460. doi:10.1093/nsr/nwu047
     .
461. doi:10.1080/00241160310004657
     .
462. ISBN 978-1-118-14797-9
     .
463. doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-042711-105329
     . Retrieved 31 May 2023.

Further reading

• Huang, Yuangeng; Chen, Zhong-Qiang; et al. (2023). "The stability and collapse of marine ecosystems during the Permian-Triassic mass extinction".
  S2CID 257186215
  .
• Mays, Chris; McLoughlin, Stephen; et al. (September 17, 2021). "Lethal microbial blooms delayed freshwater ecosystem recovery following the end-Permian extinction".
  PMID 34535650
  .
• Over, Jess (editor), Understanding Late Devonian and Permian–Triassic Biotic and Climatic Events (Volume 20 in series Developments in Palaeontology and Stratigraphy (2006)). The state of the inquiry into the extinction events.
• Sweet, Walter C. (editor), Permo–Triassic Events in the Eastern Tethys : Stratigraphy Classification and Relations with the Western Tethys (in series World and Regional Geology)

External links

• "Siberian Traps". Retrieved 2011-04-30.
• "Big Bang In Antarctica: Killer Crater Found Under Ice". Retrieved 2011-04-30.
• "Global Warming Led To Atmospheric Hydrogen Sulfide And Permian Extinction". Retrieved 2011-04-30.
• Morrison, D. "Did an Impact Trigger the Permian-Triassic Extinction?". NASA. Archived from the original on 2011-06-10. Retrieved 2011-04-30.
• "Permian Extinction Event". Retrieved 2011-04-30.
• Ogden, DE; Sleep, NH (2012). "Explosive eruption of coal and basalt and the end-Permian mass extinction".
  PMID 22184229
  .
• "BBC Radio 4 In Our Time discussion of the Permian-Triassic boundary". Retrieved 2012-02-01. Podcast available.
• Zimmer, Carl (2018-12-07). "The Planet Has Seen Sudden Warming Before. It Wiped Out Almost Everything". The New York Times. Retrieved 2018-12-10.
• "The Great Dying: Earth's largest-ever mass extinction is a warning for humanity". CBS News. Retrieved 2021-03-05.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Permian–Triassic_extinction_event&oldid=1220494583"