Acute radiation syndrome
Acute radiation syndrome | |
---|---|
Other names | Radiation poisoning, radiation sickness, radiation toxicity |
stem cell transplant)[3] | |
Prognosis | Depends on the exposure dose[4] |
Frequency | Rare[3] |
Acute radiation syndrome (ARS), also known as radiation sickness or radiation poisoning, is a collection of health effects that are caused by being exposed to high amounts of ionizing radiation in a short period of time.[1] Symptoms can start within an hour of exposure, and can last for several months.[1][3][5] Early symptoms are usually nausea, vomiting and loss of appetite.[1] In the following hours or weeks, initial symptoms may appear to improve, before the development of additional symptoms, after which either recovery or death follow.[1]
ARS involves a total dose of greater than 0.7
Treatment of ARS is generally
ARS is generally rare.[3] A single event can affect a large number of people,[7] as happened in the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the Chernobyl nuclear power plant disaster.[1] ARS differs from chronic radiation syndrome, which occurs following prolonged exposures to relatively low doses of radiation.[8][9]
Signs and symptoms
Classically, ARS is divided into three main presentations:
- Hematopoietic. This syndrome is marked by a drop in the number of rad), though they might never be felt by the patient if the dose is below 1 gray (100 rad). Conventional trauma and burns resulting from a bomb blast are complicated by the poor wound healing caused by hematopoietic syndrome, increasing mortality.
- Gastrointestinal. This syndrome often follows absorbed doses of 6–30 grays (600–3,000 rad).[3] The signs and symptoms of this form of radiation injury include nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, and abdominal pain.[10] Vomiting in this time-frame is a marker for whole body exposures that are in the fatal range above 4 grays (400 rad). Without exotic treatment such as bone marrow transplant, death with this dose is common,[3] due generally more to infection than gastrointestinal dysfunction.
- Neurovascular. This syndrome typically occurs at absorbed doses greater than 30 grays (3,000 rad), though it may occur at doses as low as 10 grays (1,000 rad).decreased level of consciousness, occurring within minutes to a few hours, with an absence of vomiting, and is almost always fatal, even with aggressive intensive care.[3]
Early symptoms of ARS typically include nausea, vomiting, headaches, fatigue, fever, and a short period of skin reddening.[3] These symptoms may occur at radiation doses as low as 0.35 grays (35 rad). These symptoms are common to many illnesses, and may not, by themselves, indicate acute radiation sickness.[3]
Dose effects
Phase | Symptom | Whole-body absorbed dose (Gy) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1–2 Gy | 2–6 Gy | 6–8 Gy | 8–30 Gy | > 30 Gy | ||
Immediate | Nausea and vomiting | 5–50% | 50–100% | 75–100% | 90–100% | 100% |
Time of onset | 2–6 h | 1–2 h | 10–60 min | < 10 min | Minutes | |
Duration | < 24 h | 24–48 h | < 48 h | < 48 h | — (patients die in < 48 h) | |
Diarrhea | None | None to mild (< 10%) | Heavy (> 10%) | Heavy (> 95%) | Heavy (100%) | |
Time of onset | — | 3–8 h | 1–3 h | < 1 h | < 1 h | |
Headache | Slight | Mild to moderate (50%) | Moderate (80%) | Severe (80–90%) | Severe (100%) | |
Time of onset | — | 4–24 h | 3–4 h | 1–2 h | < 1 h | |
Fever | None | Moderate increase (10–100%) | Moderate to severe (100%) | Severe (100%) | Severe (100%) | |
Time of onset | — | 1–3 h | < 1 h | < 1 h | < 1 h | |
CNS function | No impairment | Cognitive impairment 6–20 h | Cognitive impairment > 24 h | Rapid incapacitation | ||
Latent period |
28–31 days | 7–28 days | < 7 days | None | None | |
Illness |
Mild to moderate Fatigue
Weakness |
Moderate to severe | Severe Electrolyte disturbance
|
Nausea Vomiting Severe diarrhea High fever Electrolyte disturbance Shock |
— (patients die in < 48h) | |
Mortality | Without care | 0–5% | 5–95% | 95–100% | 100% | 100% |
With care | 0–5% | 5–50% | 50–100% | 99–100% | 100% | |
Death | 6–8 weeks | 4–6 weeks | 2–4 weeks | 2 days – 2 weeks | 1–2 days | |
Table source[11] |
A similar table and description of symptoms (given in rems, where 100 rem = 1 Sv), derived from data from the effects on humans subjected to the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the indigenous peoples of the Marshall Islands subjected to the Castle Bravo thermonuclear bomb, animal studies and lab experiment accidents, have been compiled by the U.S. Department of Defense.[12]
A person who was less than 1 mile (1.6 km) from the
The doses at the hypocenters of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombings were 240 and 290 Gy, respectively.[17]
Skin changes
Cause
ARS is caused by exposure to a large dose of ionizing radiation (> ~0.1 Gy) over a short period of time (> ~0.1 Gy/h). Alpha and beta radiation have low penetrating power and are unlikely to affect vital internal organs from outside the body. Any type of ionizing radiation can cause burns, but alpha and beta radiation can only do so if radioactive contamination or nuclear fallout is deposited on the individual's skin or clothing. Gamma and neutron radiation can travel much greater distances and penetrate the body easily, so whole-body irradiation generally causes ARS before skin effects are evident. Local gamma irradiation can cause skin effects without any sickness. In the early twentieth century, radiographers would commonly calibrate their machines by irradiating their own hands and measuring the time to onset of erythema.[26]
Accidental
Accidental exposure may be the result of a
Exposure may also come from routine spaceflight and
Intentional
Part of a series on |
Pollution |
---|
Intentional exposure is controversial as it involves the use of
Scientific testing on humans within the United States occurred extensively throughout the atomic age. Experiments took place on a range of subjects including, but not limited to; the disabled, children, soldiers, and incarcerated persons, with the level of understanding and consent given by subjects varying from complete to none. Since 1997 there have been requirements for patients to give informed consent, and to be notified if experiments were classified.
Pathophysiology
The most commonly used predictor of ARS is the whole-body
In most of the acute exposure scenarios that lead to radiation sickness, the bulk of the radiation is external whole-body gamma, in which case the absorbed, equivalent, and effective doses are all equal. There are exceptions, such as the Therac-25 accidents and the 1958 Cecil Kelley criticality accident, where the absorbed doses in Gy or rad are the only useful quantities, because of the targeted nature of the exposure to the body.
DNA damage
Exposure to high doses of radiation causes
Somatic mutations cannot be passed down from parent to offspring, but these mutations can propagate in cell lines within an organism. Radiation damage can also cause chromosome and chromatid aberrations, and their effects depend on in which stage of the mitotic cycle the cell is when the irradiation occurs. If the cell is in interphase, while it is still a single strand of chromatin, the damage will be replicated during the S1 phase of cell cycle, and there will be a break on both chromosome arms; the damage then will be apparent in both daughter cells. If the irradiation occurs after replication, only one arm will bear the damage; this damage will be apparent in only one daughter cell. A damaged chromosome may cyclize, binding to another chromosome, or to itself.[43]
Diagnosis
Diagnosis is typically made based on a history of significant radiation exposure and suitable clinical findings.[3] An absolute lymphocyte count can give a rough estimate of radiation exposure.[3] Time from exposure to vomiting can also give estimates of exposure levels if they are less than 10 Gray (1000 rad).[3]
Prevention
A guiding principle of radiation safety is as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA).[44] This means try to avoid exposure as much as possible and includes the three components of time, distance, and shielding.[44]
Time
The longer that humans are subjected to radiation the larger the dose will be. The advice in the nuclear war manual entitled Nuclear War Survival Skills published by Cresson Kearny in the U.S. was that if one needed to leave the shelter then this should be done as rapidly as possible to minimize exposure.[45]
In chapter 12, he states that "[q]uickly putting or dumping wastes outside is not hazardous once fallout is no longer being deposited. For example, assume the shelter is in an area of heavy fallout and the dose rate outside is 400 roentgen (R) per hour, enough to give a potentially fatal dose in about an hour to a person exposed in the open. If a person needs to be exposed for only 10 seconds to dump a bucket, in this 1/360 of an hour he will receive a dose of only about 1 R. Under war conditions, an additional 1-R dose is of little concern." In peacetime, radiation workers are taught to work as quickly as possible when performing a task that exposes them to radiation. For instance, the recovery of a radioactive source should be done as quickly as possible.[citation needed]
Shielding
Matter attenuates radiation in most cases, so placing any mass (e.g., lead, dirt, sandbags, vehicles, water, even air) between humans and the source will reduce the radiation dose. This is not always the case, however; care should be taken when constructing shielding for a specific purpose. For example, although high atomic number materials are very effective in shielding photons, using them to shield beta particles may cause higher radiation exposure due to the production of bremsstrahlung x-rays, and hence low atomic number materials are recommended. Also, using material with a high neutron activation cross section to shield neutrons will result in the shielding material itself becoming radioactive and hence more dangerous than if it were not present.[citation needed]
There are many types of shielding strategies that can be used to reduce the effects of radiation exposure. Internal contamination protective equipment such as respirators are used to prevent internal deposition as a result of inhalation and ingestion of radioactive material. Dermal protective equipment, which protects against external contamination, provides shielding to prevent radioactive material from being deposited on external structures.[46] While these protective measures do provide a barrier from radioactive material deposition, they do not shield from externally penetrating gamma radiation. This leaves anyone exposed to penetrating gamma rays at high risk of ARS.
Naturally, shielding the entire body from high energy gamma radiation is optimal, but the required mass to provide adequate attenuation makes functional movement nearly impossible. In the event of a radiation catastrophe, medical and security personnel need mobile protection equipment in order to safely assist in containment, evacuation, and many other necessary public safety objectives.
Research has been done exploring the feasibility of partial body shielding, a radiation protection strategy that provides adequate attenuation to only the most radio-sensitive organs and tissues inside the body. Irreversible stem cell damage in the bone marrow is the first life-threatening effect of intense radiation exposure and therefore one of the most important bodily elements to protect. Due to the regenerative property of hematopoietic stem cells, it is only necessary to protect enough bone marrow to repopulate the exposed areas of the body with the shielded supply.[47] This concept allows for the development of lightweight mobile radiation protection equipment, which provides adequate protection, deferring the onset of ARS to much higher exposure doses. One example of such equipment is the 360 gamma, a radiation protection belt that applies selective shielding to protect the bone marrow stored in the pelvic area as well as other radio sensitive organs in the abdominal region without hindering functional mobility.
More information on bone marrow shielding can be found in the "Health Physics Radiation Safety Journal". article Waterman, Gideon; Kase, Kenneth; Orion, Itzhak; Broisman, Andrey; Milstein, Oren (September 2017). "Selective Shielding of Bone Marrow: An Approach to Protecting Humans from External Gamma Radiation". Health Physics. 113 (3): 195–208.
Reduction of incorporation
Where radioactive contamination is present, an elastomeric respirator, dust mask, or good hygiene practices may offer protection, depending on the nature of the contaminant. Potassium iodide (KI) tablets can reduce the risk of cancer in some situations due to slower uptake of ambient radioiodine. Although this does not protect any organ other than the thyroid gland, their effectiveness is still highly dependent on the time of ingestion, which would protect the gland for the duration of a twenty-four-hour period. They do not prevent ARS as they provide no shielding from other environmental radionuclides.[48]
Fractionation of dose
If an intentional dose is broken up into a number of smaller doses, with time allowed for recovery between irradiations, the same total dose causes less cell death. Even without interruptions, a reduction in dose rate below 0.1 Gy/h also tends to reduce cell death.[36] This technique is routinely used in radiotherapy.[citation needed]
The human body contains many types of
Management
Treatment usually involves supportive care with possible symptomatic measures employed. The former involves the possible use of
Antimicrobials
There is a direct relationship between the degree of the neutropenia that emerges after exposure to radiation and the increased risk of developing infection. Since there are no controlled studies of therapeutic intervention in humans, most of the current recommendations are based on animal research.[citation needed]
The
Antimicrobials that reduce the number of the strict anaerobic component of the gut flora (i.e., metronidazole) generally should not be given because they may enhance systemic infection by aerobic or facultative bacteria, thus facilitating mortality after irradiation.[51]
An empirical regimen of antimicrobials should be chosen based on the pattern of bacterial susceptibility and nosocomial infections in the affected area and medical center and the degree of neutropenia. Broad-spectrum empirical therapy (see below for choices) with high doses of one or more antibiotics should be initiated at the onset of fever. These antimicrobials should be directed at the eradication of Gram-negative aerobic bacilli (i.e., Enterobacteriace, Pseudomonas) that account for more than three quarters of the isolates causing sepsis. Because aerobic and facultative Gram-positive bacteria (mostly alpha-hemolytic streptococci) cause sepsis in about a quarter of the victims, coverage for these organisms may also be needed.[52]
A standardized management plan for people with neutropenia and fever should be devised. Empirical regimens contain antibiotics broadly active against Gram-negative aerobic bacteria (
Prognosis
The prognosis for ARS is dependent on the exposure dose, with anything above 8
History
Acute effects of ionizing radiation were first observed when
Ingestion of radioactive materials caused many radiation-induced cancers in the 1930s, but no one was exposed to high enough doses at high enough rates to bring on ARS.
The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki resulted in high acute doses of radiation to a large number of Japanese people, allowing for greater insight into its symptoms and dangers. Red Cross Hospital Surgeon Terufumi Sasaki led intensive research into the syndrome in the weeks and months following the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings. Sasaki and his team were able to monitor the effects of radiation in patients of varying proximities to the blast itself, leading to the establishment of three recorded stages of the syndrome. Within 25–30 days of the explosion, Sasaki noticed a sharp drop in white blood cell count and established this drop, along with symptoms of fever, as prognostic standards for ARS.[59] Actress Midori Naka, who was present during the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, was the first incident of radiation poisoning to be extensively studied. Her death on 24 August 1945 was the first death ever to be officially certified as a result of ARS (or "Atomic bomb disease").
There are two major databases that track radiation accidents: The American
Notable cases
The following table includes only those known for their attempted survival with ARS. These cases exclude chronic radiation syndrome such as Albert Stevens, in which radiation is exposed to a given subject over a long duration. The table also necessarily excludes cases where the individual was exposed to so much radiation that death occurred before medical assistance or dose estimations could be made, such as an attempted cobalt-60 thief who reportedly died 30 minutes after exposure.[62] The "result" column represents the time of exposure to the time of death attributed to the short and long term effects attributed to initial exposure. As ARS is measured by a whole-body absorbed dose, the "exposure" column only includes units of Gray (Gy).
Date | Name | Exposure (Gy or Sv) | Incident/accident | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
August 21, 1945 | Harry Daghlian | [19] | 3.1 GyHarry Daghlian criticality accident | Death in 25 days |
May 21, 1946 | Louis Slotin | [63] | 11 GySlotin criticality accident | Death in 9 days |
Alvin C. Graves | [19] | 1.9 GyDeath in 19 years | ||
December 30, 1958 | Cecil Kelley | [64] | 36 GyCecil Kelley criticality accident | Death in 38 hours |
July 24, 1964 | Robert Peabody | [65][66] | ~100 GyRobert Peabody criticality accident | Death in 49 hours |
April 26, 1986 | Aleksandr Akimov | [67] | 15 GyChernobyl disaster | Death in 14 days |
September 30, 1999 | Hisashi Ouchi | [68] | 17 SvTokaimura Nuclear Accident | Death in 83 days |
December 2, 2001 | Patient “1-DN” | [69] | 3.6 GyLia radiological accident | Death in 893 days |
Other animals
Thousands of scientific experiments have been performed to study ARS in animals.[citation needed] There is a simple guide for predicting survival and death in mammals, including humans, following the acute effects of inhaling radioactive particles.[70]
See also
References
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o "A Fact Sheet for Physicians". CDC. CDC Radiation Emergencies Acute Radiation Syndrome. 22 April 2019. Archived from the original on 18 May 2019. Retrieved 17 May 2019.
- ^ "Beir VII: Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation" (PDF). The National Academy. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-03-07. Retrieved 2019-12-02.
- ^ from the original on 2019-06-26. Retrieved 2019-06-24.
- ^ a b c d e f g "Radiation Sickness". National Organization for Rare Disorders. Archived from the original on 12 August 2019. Retrieved 6 June 2019.
- PMID 20021452.
- PMID 17379083.
- from the original on 2022-09-22. Retrieved 2023-05-09.
- ISBN 978-3642451171.
- ISBN 978-1420037197.
- PMID 24275177.
- ^ "Radiation Exposure and Contamination - Injuries; Poisoning - Merck Manuals Professional Edition". Merck Manuals Professional Edition. Retrieved 2017-09-06.
- ^ Glasstone, Samuel (1962). The Effects of Nuclear Weapons. U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. pp. 588–597.
- ^ Geggel, Laura (2018-05-01). "Human Bone Reveals How Much Radiation Hiroshima Bomb Released – And It's Staggering". livescience.com. Archived from the original on 2019-12-27. Retrieved 2019-12-27.
- ^ Phillips, Kristine (2018-05-02). "A single jawbone has revealed just how much radiation Hiroshima bomb victims absorbed". Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2019-12-27. Retrieved 2019-12-27.
- S2CID 32660773.
- PMID 29553058.
- OCLC 872115191.
- ^ McLaughlin, Thomas P.; Monahan, Shean P.; Pruvost, Norman L.; Frolov, Vladimir V.; Ryazanov, Boris G.; Sviridov, Victor I. (May 2000), A Review of Criticality Accidents (PDF), Los Alamos, New Mexico: Los Alamos National Laboratory, pp. 74–75, LA-13638, archived (PDF) from the original on September 27, 2007, retrieved April 21, 2010
- ^ Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. LA-UR-79-2802. Archived(PDF) from the original on September 12, 2014. Retrieved January 5, 2013. Patient numbers in this document have been identified as: 1 – Daghlian, 2 – Hemmerly, 3 – Slotin, 4 – Graves, 5 – Kline, 6 – Young, 7 – Cleary, 8 – Cieleski, 9 – Schreiber, 10 – Perlman
- ^ The medical handling of skin lesions following high-level accidental irradiation, IAEA Advisory Group Meeting, September 1987 Paris.
- ISBN 978-0-9508123-0-4
- PMID 23723213.
- S2CID 604569.
- ^ Chang, Kenneth (30 May 2013). "Data Point to Radiation Risk for Travelers to Mars". New York Times. Archived from the original on 31 May 2013. Retrieved 31 May 2013.
- from the original on July 15, 2013. Retrieved July 8, 2013.
- ^ Inkret, William C.; Meinhold, Charles B.; Taschner, John C. (1995). "A Brief History of Radiation Protection Standards" (PDF). Los Alamos Science (23): 116–123. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 October 2012. Retrieved 12 November 2012.
- ISBN 92-0-129088-8. Archived(PDF) from the original on 2016-03-12. Retrieved 2005-08-22.
- ^ "Grozny orphaned source, 1999". www.johnstonsarchive.net. Archived from the original on 2022-05-16. Retrieved 2022-04-02.
- ^ "Superflares could kill unprotected astronauts". New Scientist. 21 March 2005. Archived from the original on 27 March 2015.
- ISBN 978-0-309-10264-3. Archivedfrom the original on 2010-03-28.
- ^ "Nuclear Bomb Effects". The Atomic Archive. solcomhouse.com. Archived from the original on 5 April 2014. Retrieved 12 September 2011.
- ^ "Range of weapon effects". johnstonarchive.net. Archived from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 7 March 2022.
- ^ "Human Radiation Experiments". www.atomicheritage.org. July 11, 2017. Archived from the original on December 30, 2019. Retrieved December 1, 2019.
- ^ Федоров, Юрий. "Живущие в стеклянном доме". Радио Свобода (in Russian). Archived from the original on 2015-09-01. Retrieved 2015-08-31.
- ^ "Slow Death In Kazakhstan's Land Of Nuclear Tests". RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. 2011-08-29. Archived from the original on 2016-09-20. Retrieved 2015-08-31.
- ^ ISBN 978-0-7020-3048-2. Archivedfrom the original on 16 November 2012. Retrieved 17 May 2012.
- ^ The Effects of Nuclear Weapons (Revised ed.). US Department of Defense. 1962. p. 579.
- PMID 27989142.
- ^ PMID 21130102.
- PMID 24486235.
- PMID 7905912.
- PMID 15494449.
- ^ Hall, E.; Giaccia, A. (2006). Radiobiology for the Radiobiologist (6th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
- ^ a b "Radiation Safety". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 7 December 2015. Archived from the original on 7 May 2020. Retrieved 23 April 2020.
- ISBN 978-0-942487-01-5. Archivedfrom the original on 17 October 2017.
- ^ "Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in a Radiation Emergency". www.remm.nlm.gov. Radiation Emergency Medical Management. Archived from the original on 21 June 2018. Retrieved 26 June 2018.
- S2CID 3300412.
- ^ "Radiation and its Health Effects". Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Archived from the original on 14 October 2013. Retrieved 19 November 2013.
- from the original on 2020-09-25. Retrieved 2019-06-24.
- PMID 8239601.
- from the original on 2020-09-23. Retrieved 2019-06-24.
- PMID 1524673.
- PMID 15080238.
- ^ "Time Phases of Acute Radiation Syndrome (ARS) – Dose >8 Gy". Radiation Emergency Medical Management. Archived from the original on June 28, 2019. Retrieved December 1, 2019.
- ^ ISBN 0-7216-2921-0.
- PMID 10580952.
- PMID 15486177.
- PMID 20757183.
- ISBN 978-0-88363-991-7.
- ^ Turai, István; Veress, Katalin (2001). "Radiation Accidents: Occurrence, Types, Consequences, Medical Management, and the Lessons to be Learned". Central European Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 7 (1): 3–14. Archived from the original on 15 May 2013. Retrieved 1 June 2012.
- (PDF) from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 13 June 2012.
- ^ "Criminal Dies Stealing Radioactive Material". Nuclear Threat Initiative. Archived from the original on 2021-10-06. Retrieved October 30, 2023.
- ^ Lawrence, James N. P. (6 October 1978). Internal Memorandum on Los Alamos Criticality Accidents, 1945–1946, Personnel Exposures (Report). Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. H-l-78.
- OCLC 475981026.
- ^ McLaughlin, Thomas P.; Monahan, Shean P.; Pruvost, Norman L.; Frolov, Vladimir V.; Ryazanov, Boris G.; Sviridov, Victor I. (2000). A Review of Criticality Accidents: 2000 Revision (PDF). Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory. pp. 33–34. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-09-11. Retrieved October 30, 2023.
- ^ [United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission], Division of Compliance, Region I (September 16, 1964). UNC Recovery Sytems [sic]: Compliance Investigation Report (PDF). Vol. 3 - Supplemental Report with Exhibits. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-01-07. Retrieved October 30, 2023.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ISBN 978-1541617087.
- ^ "World's most radioactive man 'cried blood' as his skin melted in 83-day nightmare". TimesNow. 29 March 2023. Retrieved 21 May 2023.
- OCLC 900016880.
- ISSN 0368-2595.
- This article incorporates public domain material from websites or documents of the U.S. Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
External links
- "Emergency preparedness and subject matter expertise on the medical management of radiation incidents". U.S. Radiation Emergency Assistance Center Training Site REACts. Archived from the original on 2023-05-05.
- "Fact sheet on Acute Radiation Syndrome". U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Archived from the original on 16 July 2006. Retrieved 22 July 2006.
- "The criticality accident in Sarov" (PDF). International Atomic Energy Agency. 2001. – A well documented account of the biological effects of a criticality accident.
- "Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute". Archived from the original on 2015-03-03. Retrieved 2011-07-01.