User:PericlesofAthens/Sandbox2

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

SANDBOX2

Hello, this one of my sandboxes.

The others can be found here:

Here are my article drafts:

The Arts, Archaeology, and Architecture

Liu's Introductory Essay

Liu, Cary Y. (2005). "The 'Wu Family Shrines' as a Recarving of the Past," in Recarving China's Past: Art, Archaeology, and Architecture of the 'Wu Family Shrines', 23–74. Edited by Naomi Noble Richard. New Haven and London: Yale University Press and Princeton University Art Museum.

.

  • Page 23-24: The carved reliefs of the 'Wu family shrines' of southwestern
    Qing Dynasty
    came across the tomb site in Jiaxing County, Shandong, in 1786 where he discovered the many pictorial scenes carved in stone. The carved images from the 2nd century AD display QUOTE: "legendary rulers, paragons of filial peity and loyalty, historical and mythological stories, and scenes of feasting, homage, processions, omens, and other figural and decorative subjects."
  • Page 24: Stephen W. Bushell (1844–1908) acquired in Beijing a set of rubbings from the Wu family shrines and in 1881 brought them to the International Congress of Orientalists in Berlin. Since 1961, the Wu family shrines have been under government protection as a heritage site by the State Council of the PRC.
  • Page 26: The pictorial stone carvings and calligraphy inscriptions of the Wu family shrines are documented in the Record of Collected Antiquities by Ouyang Xiu (1007–1072), the Catalogue of 'Record of Collected Antiquities' by Ouyang Fei (1047–1113), the Records of Metal and Stone by Zhao Mingcheng (1081–1129), and the Explications of Clerical Script by Hong Gua (1117–1184). QUOTE: "Ouyang Xiu and Ouyang Fei only partly transcribed or listed two stele inscriptions and never related them to the same Wu family in Shandong, to shrines, or to each other. Zhao Mingcheng partly transcribed three stele inscriptions and was the first to record the existence of a Wu family gate-pillar inscription and pictorial carvings belonging to a 'Wu family stone chamber' (Wushi shishi). With Hong Gua, the assemblage finally comprises four stele inscriptions, dedicated respectively to Wu Liang (courtesy name Suizong, 78–151), his brother Wu ? (courtesy name Kaiming 92–148), and the latter's sons, Wu Ban (courtesy name Xuanzhang, d. 145) and Wu Rong (courtesy name Shehe [or Hanhe]; d. 167); a gate-pillar inscription dated to 147, and several pictorial stones including, for the first time, the 'Confucius Meeting Laozi' slab. It is also with Hong Gua that the architectural chamber first becomes known as the 'Wu Liang Shrine' (Wu Liang Ci or Wu Liang Citang)."
  • Page 27: However, Ouyang Xiu, Ouyang Fei, Zhao Mingcheng, and Hong Gua never personally traveled to the Jiaxiang County cemetary assemblage attributed as a whole to the Wu Family Shrine complex, thus they never directly matched the rubbings that were allegedly made there with actual carved pictorial stone or stele.
  • Page 28: The scholars of the Song and Qing dynasties were largely concerned with the rubbings of inscriptions written in Han Dynasty clerical script and not so much the pictorial carvings. Zhao Mingcheng allegedly wrote five chapters on the pictorial stone carvings, but these have not survived. Hong Gua created the first reproduction of the stone carvings in his book, but the illustration from Hong Gua's surviving written works perhaps do not date to the Song period (and are possibly reproductions of reproductions!). Clerical script was studied by epigraphists of the Song Dynasty, and in the Qing Dynasty the scholarship concerning clerical script was revived. In his work of 1787, the Qing archaeologist Huang Yi wrote of his excitement when he realized that a few stones from the Wu Liang Shrine and Wu Ban stele were recorded in the works of Zhao Mingcheng and Hong Gua. Cary Y. Liu is not sure which versions of the Song texts Huang Yi would have consulted.
  • Page 29-30: There is some doubt that these shrines were ever dedicated to the Wu family or managed by them at all, due to the story of the two surviving steles (i.e. those for Wu Ban and Wu Rong). Huang Yi asserted that the one for Wu Ban was moved to the site decades before. The one for Wu Rong was also located in the Minglun Tang hall of the Jining Prefectural Academy at the same time Huang Yi was busy exploring the cemetary site in 1786. As Huang Yi noted, the steles for Wu Liang and Wu Kaiming have yet to be found.
  • Page 30: In the late 19th century, Western and Japanese historians began taking photographs of the rubbings and the actual carved pictorial scenes at the site. However, from these photographs there is no way to get a sense of the sequential dates of the rubbings or the architectural context.
  • Page 34: With the work of Wilma Fairbank in 1941 and the work of Jiang Yingju and Wu Wenqi in 1981, the way that the stones were once fit together architecturally were discerned, something which could not have been accomplished with mere individual rubbings or photographs. Jiang Yingju and Wu Wenqi argeed with Fairbank that there were originally three halls, but removed her assertion that there was a central column for the single-bay structure that was the Wu Liang Shrine. The front and left shrines were defined as two-bay structures by Fairbank, but were renamed Front Stone Chamber and Left Stone Chamber by Jiang Yingju and Wu Wenqi. Cary Y. Liu, however, is doubtful that the original structures represented "shrines" at all, and is not even sure that the cemetary belonged to the Wu family. In the Han Dynasty, a "shrine" meant a funerary offering hall built for aristocrats or high officials; Wu Liang, Wu Kaiming, Wu Ban, and Wu Rong were only low-ranking local officials.
  • Page 35: Jiang and Wu were able to reconstruct Wu Liang's shrine and the two separate chambers by analyzing the differences in the stylistic carvings on the many scattered sets of stones. They found that the pictorial stones that should be put together to form Wu Liang's shrine all featured figrues with a certain type of nose, while the other two chambers featured human figures with a unique style of nose. This allowed them to successfully reconstruct the five roof slabs in the Rear Group Stones 1–5 (R.1–R.5) in the Front and Left chambers. These stones, showing mythological scenes, were originally thought to represent stones of a separate fourth chamber, but now the issue has been cleared up. QUOTE: "From carved roof tiles on the back of these stones, dimensions, and mortise-and-tenon joint locations, Jiang and Wu matched Stones R.4 and R.5 to the Front Chamber, and R.1–R.3 to the Left Chamber."
  • Page 35: QUOTE: "Building on the work of Fairbank as well as Jiang and Wu, in 1989 Wu Hung in his Wu Liang Shrine: The Ideology of Early Chinese Pictorial Art proposed a 'Fourth Chamber.' Recognizing similarities among four pictorial stones in the remaining group of miscellaneous slabs, he was able to partially reconstruct a fourth structure that may or may not have been originally connected with the cemetery site (discussed below). Wu Hung also developed a detailed iconographical study focusing on the pictorial images in the structure traditionally believed to be dedicated to Wu Liang. He suggested that the carvings exhibit a coherent pictorial and architectural program in accord with Eastern Han cosmology."

Loewe's Keynote Essay

Loewe, Michael. (2005). "Funerary Practice in Han Times," in Recarving China's Past: Art, Archaeology, and Architecture of the 'Wu Family Shrines', 23–74. Edited by Naomi Noble Richard. New Haven and London: Yale University Press and Princeton University Art Museum.

.

Liu's Chapter on Brilliant Artifacts

Liu, Cary Y. (2005). "The Concept of 'Brilliant Artifacts' in the Han Dynasty Burial Objects and Funerary Architecture: Embodying the Harmony of the Sun and the Moon," in Recarving China's Past: Art, Archaeology, and Architecture of the 'Wu Family Shrines', 204–221. Edited by Naomi Noble Richard. New Haven and London: Yale University Press and Princeton University Art Museum.

.

Bower's Chapter on the Nude Figurines

Bower, Virginia (2005). "Standing man and woman," in Recarving China's Past: Art, Archaeology, and Architecture of the 'Wu Family Shrines', 242–245. Edited by Naomi Noble Richard. New Haven and London: Yale University Press and Princeton University Art Museum.

.

Bower's Chapter on the Kneeling Female Attendant

Bower, Virginia (2005). "Kneeling female attendant," in Recarving China's Past: Art, Archaeology, and Architecture of the 'Wu Family Shrines', 246–247. Edited by Naomi Noble Richard. New Haven and London: Yale University Press and Princeton University Art Museum.

.

  • NOTE: The female figurine illustrated on page 246 is of the Western Han, made of dark gray clay with pigments over white slip, and is 39.4 cm tall.
  • Page 247: QUOTE: "A number of kneeling figures similar to the present one were excavated in 1966 from various pits at a site known as Renjiapo in the eastern suburb of Xi'an. This site is believed to be the necropolis of Empress Dou (d. 135 BCE), the wife of the early Western Han emperor Wendi (r. 180–157 BCE). Its dark gray clay, once covered with white slip and pigments, as well as its serene oval face, make this is [sic] a very typical example of early Western Han mortuary sculpture, most likely created in the Xi'an area, where the Western Han capital Chang'an was located. As noted in Sleeve dancer (cat. no. 6), a large number of figures of women with oval faces and similar coiffures, made of gray earthenware and painted in white slip, have been recovered from the Xi'an area. These figures have generally been dated to the early Western Han period."
  • Page 247: QUOTE: "In its respectful kneeling posture this figure is comparable with the many kneeling male and female figures seen in the Wu rubbings (fig. 1). In the rubbings almost all the figures that can be identified as female wear elaborate lobed headdresses, whereas this figure, like many Western Han female figures, is shown with no headdress and hair hanging down in back and bound below the nape of the neck. The kneeling posture is generally interpreted as a show of respect, presumably for the deceased. Note, however, that in this era before the advent of the chair in China, even high-ranking persons knelt rather than sat, and that kneeling did not necessarily indicate low rank, let alone servility. The large male figures who kneel while receiving homage in the central pavilion scenes in the Wu rubbings (cat. nos. 1.9, 1.26, 1.36) are evidently of high status."

Bower's Chapter on the Sleeve dancer

Bower, Virginia (2005). "Sleeve dancer," in Recarving China's Past: Art, Archaeology, and Architecture of the 'Wu Family Shrines', 248–251. Edited by Naomi Noble Richard. New Haven and London: Yale University Press and Princeton University Art Museum.

.

White cranes gliding by;
A cocoon unwinding its threads.
Their long sleeves, twirling and twisting, fill the hall;
Gauze-stockinged feet, taking mincing steps,
move with slow and easy gait.
They hover about long and continuously as if
stopped in mid-air...
  • Page 250: Bower goes on to write, QUOTE: "Textual accounts of sleeve dancing are also recorded in pre-Western and early Western Han texts such as the
    Han Feizi
    , and even include one historical reference involving the founder of the Han dynasty. Su Yan correlated many of these textual references to all the various types of sleeve dancing with a variety of images from Sichuan, Henan, and Shandong."

Ruitenbeek's Chapter on the Triangular Hollow Tomb Tile

Ruitenbeek, Klaas. (2005). "Triangular hollow tomb tile with dragon design," in Recarving China's Past: Art, Archaeology, and Architecture of the 'Wu Family Shrines', 252–254. Edited by Naomi Noble Richard. New Haven and London: Yale University Press and Princeton University Art Museum.

.

  • NOTE: This is the chapter on the image you already scanned and uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, the one with the dragon and the warrior with the sword and shield.
  • Page 253: QUOTE: "The period during which large hollow tiles were used for tomb construction coincides fairly precisely with the dates of the Qin and Western Han dynasties, with the majority dating to the first century BCE. The tiles are of two main types: the more common bear relief designs composed of many repeated impressions of different small stamps; less commonly are very large tiles with geometric borders framing large motifs executed in intaglio by a few large stamp impressions. Most of both types are rectangular; a few are triangular and were used in pairs to form the gables of house-shaped tomb chambers. All the intaglio tiles were found in Luoyang and vicinity; all share a natrualistically styled repertoire of large birds, human figures, horses, dogs, wild animals, dragons, and trees; and all seem to come from one workshop or a small number of closely related workshops. The Royal Ontario Museum owns about sixty intaglio tiles, purchased from the hundreds that were on the market in Luoyang in the 1920s and 1930s. About sixty more have been published in China since the 1980s. All are scattered finds; none have been properly excavated from a known site."
  • Page 253: QUOTE: "This gable tile is exceptional in that its decoration does not consist of a number of repeated motifs, but of one large stamped dragon on each face; one with a rider, one without (fig. 1). Both dragons measure about seventy centimeters from snout to tail, and thus are by far the largest single stamped design found on any tomb tile. They were not produced, however, by one giant stamp, but by carefully aligning a number of partial stamps. Five stamps were used for the dragon with a rider: head and breast; middle section with sword- and shield-brandishing rider; withers with hind leg; and the tail in two sections. We know that a single stamp rendered the dragon's midsection and the rider, because the rider's right foot covers a dragon tentacle without any crossing of lines. Exactly the same dragon with rider is found on another, rectangular, tile in the Royal Ontario Museum's collection; the riderless dragon is also stamped on a rectangular tile in the Carnegie Museum of Art in Pittsburgh."
  • Page 253-254: QUOTE: "Hollow tomb tiles were formed in a wooden trough of the same size and shape as the tile. It was lined with cloth to allow for easy removal of the formed clay. First a large slab of clay, cut with a string from a block, was pressed against the bottom of the form to fashion one face of the tile. At right angles to this slab were attached narrower strips of clay; these would form the narrower sides of the tile. A sandbag was then laid inside the clay-lined form and the top slab put in place over it; the sandbag prevented the top slab from sagging. After the assembled tile had dried to a leather-hard consistency, it was removed from the form. Almost all rectangular tomb tiles have one or two round holes cut into one of the two narrow sides, and an oblong aperture in the other. The aperture allowed for easy opening of the sandbag, pouring out the sand, and removing the bag. Some tiles, including this triangular one, have only the round holes, which means that the bag was sacrificed. According to W.C. White, the holes were used for connecting the tiels with rods or ropes. There is no evidence for this, and it seems much more likely that the holes were cut to permit good circulation of hot air during firing. After the tiles were wetted to soften the surface and carefully smoothed with a spatula to remove the impression of the lining cloth, the stamped designs were impressed."
  • Page 254: QUOTE: "On its longer vertical side this tile bears an inscription, scratched before firing, that reads nan he xi ("west of the south gable"). He is the technical term for the head- and footboards of a wooden coffin, and apparently was also used for the gables of tile tombs with a vault in the shape of an inverted V. The inscription provides linguistic evidence that tomb chambers of hollow tiles were originally conceived as ceramic versions of wooden outer coffins. Perhaps a further indication of this is the fact that all hollow tomb tiles of this type with intaglio lines are decorated on both sides. A hollow-tile tomb of the simpler type, with a flat ceiling, might be compared with an outer coffin of the Mawangdui type, with its richly decorated exterior (but undecorated interior). In Eastern Han tomb chambers such as Zuo Biao's tomb (cat. no. 12), the lining stones are carved on the interior only. This may indicate a chronological transition from other coffins decorated primarily ont he exterior (like the Mawangdui coffin), to tile chambers decorated on both sides (like the present one), and finally to stone burial chambers decorated only on their interior, visible, face."
  • Page 254: "Only one face of this triangular tomb tile is colored. Thanks to the inscription, we know that it was the interior face; evidently the tomb's interior was more important than its exterior. Hollow-tile tombs thus seem to be a transitional stage between the tombs of the Warring States and Western Han, constructed of heavy logs containing nested coffins, and the brick and stone chambers of the Eastern Han and later."

Beningson's Chapter on the Tomb Wall Tile

Beningson, Susan L. (2005). "Tomb wall tile stamped with designs of an archer, trees, horses, and beasts," in Recarving China's Past: Art, Archaeology, and Architecture of the 'Wu Family Shrines', 258–260. Edited by Naomi Noble Richard. New Haven and London: Yale University Press and Princeton University Art Museum.

.

A drawn diagram in this chapter shows cross sections of a tomb with a roof that is identical to this one, and the stamped wall tiles in this picture by Gary Lee Todd look exactly like the one on page 258 of this chapter by Beningson. On page 259, the caption for the drawn illustration of the tomb layout reads as thus: "Fig. 1 Diagram of layout of hollow-brick Tomb 61 at Luoyang. View looking from east to west toward back of the burial chamber (top). View looking from west to east toward the tomb entrance (bottom). Western Han dynasty, second half of first century BCE. After Kaogu xuebao 1964.2, p. 110."
The style of artwork on this tomb brick picture taken by Gary Lee Todd is identical to the stamp style on the long tile shown on page 258 of Beningson's chapter quoted here. Of the image on page 258, the caption for this chapter on page 259 reads: "Eastern Han dynasty. Henan Province. Earthenware with traces of pigment; h. 50 cm, w. 153 cm."
  • Page 259: QUOTE: "Hollow bricks came into use in tomb construction during the late Warring States period. During the Han dynasty they became an integral part of tomb architecture and imagery, particularly around modern-day Luoyang and Zhengzhou, Henan province. Hundreds of bricks, many stamped with intaglio designs, were unearthed from 1925 to 1932, during the construction of the Longhai Railroad. The hollow pictorial brick in the Princeton collection became the first known in 1936 as part of the C.T. Loo collection."
  • Page 259: QUOTE: "Hollow bricks were made from gray clay that was made into thick slabs and formed in large draw molds. The two large faces of the brick were attached with narrower pieces of clay which formed the sides, to create the hollow box. While still wet, the clay was impressed with molds or stamps, which created both the pictures and the geometric designs in intaglio lines. Unintentionally overlapping of stamps was quite common, and can be seen in the inner border of the Princeton tile on the upper left side. Hollow bricks were ligher and less prone to fissuring during firing than solid bricks. They were used in conjunction with carved bricks, and were often left unstamped to accomodate painting, as in Bu Qianqiu's tomb. They remained popular until the late Han dynasty, when tomb architecture became more complex, including long passageways or arches, which hollow-brick construction could not support. At that time they were replaced almost entirely by decorated solid bricks."
  • Page 259: QUOTE: "Hollow bricks were used for the doorframe on either side of the tomb door, for the top of the door lintel, and to seal the door (fig. 1). They were also included in the walls of the main tomb chamber, as well as for the ceiling ridge and the ceiling itself (cat. no. 8). The hollow bricks for the ceiling supports were triangular sections that followed the ceiling slope and were often painted (cat. no. 7). Both these triangular slabs and the doorway lintel were supported on pillars. Usually the hollow bricks used for the tomb floor have plain surfaces and those for the ceiling have geometric designs. Typically bricks in other locations have pictures bordered by geometric designs. Hollow bricks were also used outside the main tomb structure in the construction of stairways and in other locations."
  • Page 259-260: QUOTE: "The picture on the Princeton brick is divided into three sections that are demarcated by fruit-bearing trees whose roots extend beyond the lower border. At far left a hunter sprints leftward while looking back over his shoulder to shoot an arrow from his bow. The upper arc of the bow mirrors the shape of his elongated and hooked nose, a feature perhaps intended to indicate a foreigner. To the upper right of each tree is a bird with two elongated tail feathers, facing left while flying to the right. Under the left-hand bird a crane both walks and faces right. In the center is a pair of deer, the male in front charging to the right, the doe also moving rightward but looking toward the left. To the right of the deer is a second, identical, crane. To the right of the second tree a tiger pounces to the right while looking back to the left, its neck arched in the same curve as that of the bird above it. Bordering and framing these images top and bottom are two bands of geometric designs, an inner band of lozenge and an outer band of wave patterns. The outermost borders are similar to the uppermost border on all four sides of the third layered coffin from Tomb 1 at Mawangdui, Changsha, Hunan Province. The present hollow-brick tile may display auspicious imagery of the Han cosmological universe. The hunter, tiger, and deer all inhabit the celestial landscape on the bronze chariot fitting (cat. no. 29) in this exhibition, and archers, cranes, and birds can be found in the rubbings of the 'Wu family shrines.'"

Steinhardt's Chapter on the Pleasure Tower Model

Steinhardt, Nancy N. (2005). "Pleasure tower model," in Recarving China's Past: Art, Archaeology, and Architecture of the 'Wu Family Shrines', 275–281. Edited by Naomi Noble Richard. New Haven and London: Yale University Press and Princeton University Art Museum.

.

Steinhardt's Chapter on the Tower Model

Steinhardt, Nancy N. (2005). "Tower model," in Recarving China's Past: Art, Archaeology, and Architecture of the 'Wu Family Shrines', 283–285. Edited by Naomi Noble Richard. New Haven and London: Yale University Press and Princeton University Art Museum.

.

Juliano's Chapter on a Model Farm

Juliano, Annette L. (2005). "Model of a farm compound with human figure, sow and suckling pig, chickens, trough, and basin," in Recarving China's Past: Art, Archaeology, and Architecture of the 'Wu Family Shrines', 286–289. Edited by Naomi Noble Richard. New Haven and London: Yale University Press and Princeton University Art Museum.

.

  • Page 287: QUOTE: "During the Han Dynasty the quantity and variety of clay mingqi proliferated, so that the tomb furnishings record the prosperous lives of upper class landowners. Tombs were fully equipped to sustain the deceased in the afterlife, and included models of servants, entertainers, musicians, and garden pavilions; oil lamps, guardians, and striking watch towers illuminated and protected the tomb. Included also were the more mundane necessities of life, such as stoves, wellheads, lamps, and storage jars. Often the mingqi paralleled pictorial images painted, carved in stone, or stamped on tiles to decorate the walls of tombs and shrines. Underlining the importance of agriculture in Han life and economy, the many types of architectural models that came into use then included farm buildings, ranging from modest single-story structures and granaries to large farm compounds with attached animal pens and yards."
  • Page 287: QUOTE: "This farmyard or compound, fashioned out of dark clay, has high walls topped with simulated tile roofs along the back, one side, and part of the other side and the front. On the unwalled front, steps lead up to a wide walkway, patterned with decorative circular tiles stamped into the clay...The main walkway with its circles leads in one direction to a small roofed building with a door and two windows, perhaps a privy; in the other direction to a low parapet facing the courtyard. Along the bottom of the inside walls of this clay model, four parallel horizontal lines with periodic vertical scoring suggest a brick-like foundation that would have supported the stucco walls. Inside the enclosed farmyard is a sow suckling piglets, chickens, and a trough and basin for water and feed. Many very similar structures, containing pigs or a mix of animals, have been excavated from tombs across north China (fig. 1), and a fragment of one such example was recovered from Tomb 1 at the cemetery associated with the 'Wu shrines' (fig. 2)."
  • Page 287: QUOTE: "Complementing clay models of stoves, wellheads, and farmyards with animals, lively kitchen scenes painted or carved on tomb walls, including those of the 'Wu family shrines' (fig. 3), showed the preparation of food, from the butchering of the animals to the roasting. In these scenes, victuals hung on racks usually include fish, fowl, and meat. Many Han tombs, especially those of the Eastern Han, contained ceramic pigs, pigsty, and chickens. Meat, inclding chicken, pork, and beef, was certainly part of the diet of the rich but not readily made available to the ordinary Chinese. Although beef was highly prized, oxen were so important as draft animals that the government occasionally prohibited their slaughter. Chicken was probably the most accessible form of meat for average Chinese, though not for the very poor."

Hiromi's Chapter on the Storehouse Model

Hiromi, Kinoshita. (2005). "Storehouse model," in Recarving China's Past: Art, Archaeology, and Architecture of the 'Wu Family Shrines', 290–291. Edited by Naomi Noble Richard. New Haven and London: Yale University Press and Princeton University Art Museum.

.

Liu's Chapter on the Green-glazed Wellhead

Liu, Cary Y. (2005). "Green-glazed wellhead," in Recarving China's Past: Art, Archaeology, and Architecture of the 'Wu Family Shrines', 292–295. Edited by Naomi Noble Richard. New Haven and London: Yale University Press and Princeton University Art Museum.

.

Thompson's Chapter on the Wellhead

Thompson, Lydia. (2005). "Wellhead with dragon, bird, and guardian designs" in Recarving China's Past: Art, Archaeology, and Architecture of the 'Wu Family Shrines', 296–299. Edited by Naomi Noble Richard. New Haven and London: Yale University Press and Princeton University Art Museum.

.

Hiromi's Chapter on the Stove Model

Hiromi, Kinoshita. (2005). "Stove model," in Recarving China's Past: Art, Archaeology, and Architecture of the 'Wu Family Shrines', 300–301. Edited by Naomi Noble Richard. New Haven and London: Yale University Press and Princeton University Art Museum.

.

  • Page 301: QUOTE: "Model stoves made of bronze, and especially of earthenware, appear in tombs from the Western Han into the Six Dynasties. Their appearance in early Han tombs, along with the utilitarian objects such as braziers, lamps, incense burners, and mirrors, signals not merely the introduction of a new category of grave godos, but, more importantly, a change in the conception of the afterlife. Beginning in the third century BCE, ritual vessels—containers for food and wine offerings to the ancestors of the deceased, which were of paramount importance in tombs of late
    Zhou
    —appear to have decreased in importance. At this time new categories of objects were being made that were not necessarily used for ritual practice—that is, in offering food and wine for ancestor worship—but were part of secular banqueting."
  • Page 301: QUOTE: "This animal-shaped stove illustrates the imagination and creativity of Han bronze makers. Raised on four slender horse-hoofed feet, the body of the animal functions as the firebox, into which fuel would have been placed through a rectangular opening at the back. The elongated neck of the tortoise-like creature would have vented the smoke from the firebox out through its open mouth. In the top surfacee of the stove body are three circular openings, one large, upon which two bronze flat-rimmed basins sit, and two smaller ones. A very similar example was excavated in 1983 from a late Western Han tomb in Shuo County, Shanxi."

Central Asian Transmission of Buddhist Texts to China

Zhang, Guanuda. (2002). "The Role of the Sogdians as Translators of Buddhist Texts," in Silk Road Studies VII: Nomads, Traders, and Holy Men Along China's Silk Road, 75–78. Edited by Annette L. Juliano and Judith A. Lerner. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers.

.

Roman Glass in China

An, Jiayao. (2002). "When Glass Was Treasured in China," in Silk Road Studies VII: Nomads, Traders, and Holy Men Along China's Silk Road, 79–94. Edited by Annette L. Juliano and Judith A. Lerner. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers.

.

This cosmetic Roman glass bottle from Istria, dated 1st century AD, looks strikingly similar to the Roman glass bottle in Fig. 5 of An Jiayou's chapter, page 84, i.e. the Roman glass bottle which was excavated from an Eastern Han tomb in Luoyang.
  • NOTE: Although you are unable to see the pictures, the two cups foundfrom the Jiangsu tomb dated 128 B.C.E. look like short, stubby cylinders. The double-handled cup from the tomb at Mancheng, Hebei, dated 113 B.C.E., looks a lot like this double-handled jade cup, a picture you took at the Freer Gallery, although the jade cup seems taller and less wide.
  • Page 82: QUOTE: "We have seen that glass was treasured in China, but only glass that came from far away was treasured—and not until the importation of Roman glass was glass truly treasured. Roman glass, that is, glass manufactured in the Roman Empire from the first century B.C.E. to the fifth century C.E., was exotic and considered of special quality. Early Roman glass coincides with the flourishing of the Han Empire. The emperor Han Wudi (140–86 B.C.E.) sent emissaries to the Southern Sea to buy such glass."
  • Page 83: QUOTE: "A glass bowl (fig. 4) was found in Guangzhou, in a Western Han tomb and is dated to the early first century B.C.E. It was cast and its surface is crude. When held to a light, the surface is a beautiful deep blue color. X-ray fluorescence analysis shows that it is soda-lime glass. This is the earliest Roman glass found in China. Since Guangzhou is near the South China Sea, it is possible that this glass bowl came along the maritime trade route."
  • Page 83: QUOTE: "Similarly, fragments of a Roman mosaic-glass ribbed bowl may have come via the sea route. They were found in a prince's tomb near Nanjing. They belong to a type that was popular throughout the Mediterranean in the first centuries B.C.E. and C.E. The tomb dates to 67 C.E., not much later than the bowl's manufacture in the West."
  • Page 83-84: QUOTE:
    Western Asian
    traders settling in Luoyang at this time."

Iranian Luxury Vessels in China

Harper, P.O. 2002). "Iranian Luxury Vessels in China From the Late First Millennium B.C.E. to the Second Half of the First Millennium C.E.," in Silk Road Studies VII: Nomads, Traders, and Holy Men Along China's Silk Road, 95–113. Edited by Annette L. Juliano and Judith A. Lerner. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers.

.

Dionysos
resting on a feline creature

Wang's Book Chapters on the Capitals

Wang, Zhongshu. (1982). Han Civilization. Translated by K.C. Chang and Collaborators. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

.

Chang'an, Capital of the Western Han

Luoyang, Capital of the Eastern Han

Wang's Miscellaneous Book Chapters

Wang, Zhongshu. (1982). Han Civilization. Translated by K.C. Chang and Collaborators. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

.

Han Agriculture

  • Page 52: The most important agricultural food staples during the Han Dynasty were
    Yangzi River region, wheat, barley, and rice were mostly produced, while rice paddies dominated southern agricultural fields. The Han Chinese ate long-grain rice, short-grain rice, and glutinous rice
    .
  • Page 53: The Han Chinese also consumed
    Job's Tears, taro, mallow, mustard green, melon, bottle gourd, bamboo shoot, the roots of lotus plants, and ginger. Some of the fruits the Han ate included the chestnut, jujube, pear, peach, plum (including the plum of prunus salicina and Prunus mume), apricot, and the red bayberry
    .
  • Page 53: Hemp was grown and commonly used for weaving cloth.
  • Page 53: The use of iron agricultural implements was widespread during the Han, found even on the frontiers from
    plow, all used for tillage; the hoe used for weeding; and the sickle, used for harvesting." There were also rakes
    used for loosening the soil.
  • Page 53: Han
    Warring States Period
    plowshares made almost entirely out of wood except for the blade.
  • Page 54: Moldboards have been found in several sites excavated and dated to the Han Dynasty. They were attached to the top of the plowshare and were used alongside the plowshare to turn the soil.
  • Page 54: The Han Chinese used oxen as draft animals for driving the plow, and they are depicted as such in numerous Han tomb brick stampings and painted murals. The plow could be driven by one or two oxen.
  • Page 54-55: The Han Chinese used the three-legged seed drill, made of iron, and pulled along by an ox like a plow.
  • Page 55: The Wei and Jin Chinese employed the harrow (tool) drawn by oxen, and it is very possible it existed since the Eastern Han. The farmer stood on the harrow as the ox dragged it, to increase downward pressure. After the plows turned the soil, the lumps of earth had to be broken apart with the teeth of the harrow. After the seeds were sown, they had to be covered by a leveler, which was also pulled by an ox. The leveler, like the harrow, was depicted in Wei and Jin art, but may have been used as early as Eastern Han.
  • Page 55-56: The
    Dujiangyan Irrigation System built during the Qin. In 1974, a Han Dynasty stone statue of Li Bing
    standing almost 3 m (10 ft) tall was found at the bottom of the Dujiangyan. Apparently, QUOTE: "It was placed in the middle of the water not only to commemorate Li Bing's deeds but also to serve as a gauge of the water level."
  • Page 56: The Chinese made extensive use of wells to irrigate farm fields. In addition to river water, artificial ponds and embankments were made to store irrigation water. Sluice gates were used to regulate water levels flowing from artificial reservoirs into nearby fields.
  • Page 56-57: After grains were harvested using iron sickles, QUOTE: "threshing and winnowing had to be done.; these are also featured on certain pictorial bricks and murals. It is noteworthy that in the Han tombs in Luoyang and Jiyuan of Henan we have also found pottery models of winnowing machines. Generally speaking, millet and wheat were planted in the North, and the threshing process was necessary to separate out the chaff; whereas in the South, where rice was cultivated, the winnowing machine was needed to separate out the husks. However, from the Han tombs excavated at Luoyang and Jiyuan, we see that some winnowing machines were also used in the northern Central Plains area."
  • Page 57: QUOTE "To process grains, a jiandui (treadle-operated tilt hammer) was commonly used. It was a simple machine operated by a foot whose purpose was to pound grain. Pictures of this machine appear on pictorial stones and bricks as well as in pottery models found in many places. From historical records we know that during the Wei and Jin dynasties there was also widespread use of water-powered tilt hammers. Mills, consisting of two rotating stone slabs, were also common during the Han. Actual mills as well as pottery models of them have been discovered at many archaeological sites and tombs. The earliest stone mill was found in a Han tomb in Mancheng. Underneath the mill there was a large bronze bowl, used to catch the flour ground out by the mill."
  • Page 57: The Han Chinese domesticated and ate
    cows, sheep, pigs, and dogs
    . QUOTE: "In pottery models found in Han tombs, pigpens are often connected to the privies, the arrangement indicating that pig excrement was used to fertilize the fields."
  • Page 58: The type of game animals hunted during the Han included . Fish and turtles from natural rivers and lakes and artificial ponds were also hunted.
  • Page 58: Obviously, there was widespread cultivation of the mulberry tree and silkworm to produce silk, a product made to supplement agricultural production of small-time private village farmers and by large-scale manufacturers.
  • Page 58-59: From census records found in Han tombs, the average family in Eastern Han had 24.6 mou of land, or 6 mou per person (each mou is equivalent to 456 square m). According to Han records, 6 mou of land could only produce about 20 piculs (each picul equivalent to roughly 20 liters). A person's daily food requirement necessitated the consumption of 18 piculs a year, leaving the farmer with little surplus. To make matters worse, Han records also show heavy demands from taxes and for corvée labor service. This no doubt drove many small-time farmers into bankruptcy, forcing them to seek aid, shelter, and tenant jobs from large-scale landowners. QUOTE: "Some even had to sell themselves as slaves." The rise of rich, privately owned country manors swallowing up once independent farms and collecting all of the bankrupt farmers who used to work them could be seen by as early as the late Western Han.
  • Page 59-60: Due to the lenient laws of the Eastern Han, this land aggrandizement became more severe as QUOTE "manors became both more numerous and larger. Agricultural production on the manors was carried out by the landowners' slaves and others who were personally dependent upon them; that is, the so-called bond-servants." At the same time, the manors of wealthy landowners became self-sufficient, as a varied work force could produce enough food for everyone and enough side industries to sell non-agricultural products for extra profit. This includes the production of hemp and silk for clothing, wine for ritual or beverage drinking, and vinegar for food.
  • Page 60: As seen in Han tomb murals of Holinger, Inner Mongolia where a prominent official, landowner and colonel of the Wuhuan Army was buried, the murals depict all the labor processes of agriculture, as well as the layout of the manor. On the manor is a walled fort with a tall watchtower. QUOTE: "Hence we can see that the manor's buildings included those used for military or defensive purposes. The farmers who worked on the estate were not only the wards of the powerful landlord, they were also members of his private militia." In addition to clues in late Eastern Han historical texts about farmers who were given martial duties, QUOTE "From a late Eastern Han tomb in Tianhuishan in Chengdu, Sichuan, archaeologists found clay figures of farmers and soldiers; they not only are wearing the same kind of clothes, the farmers are also shown wearing large battle knifes [sic]. This evidence further corroborates the military roles of the farmers at that time."
  • Page 61: During the late Eastern Han, Cao Cao curbed the power of landlords by prohibiting land aggrandizement and establishing the tuntian or "agricultural colony" system. QUOTE: "There were two kinds of tuntian, the commoners' and the soldiers'. In the first, common farmers who did not ahve their own land or oxen were recruited to farm government land under the direction of various agriculture officials. Fifty to sixty percent of their harvest had ot be turned over to the government. In the second kind of tuntian, soldiers were organized to engage in agricultural production and the harvest was used by the military." Two Wei or Jin dynasty wall murals of a military tuntian were found at Jiayuguan, Gansu province.

Lacquerware Crafts

Bronzes

  • Page 100: Here he talks about the great amount of luxury bronzewares found in Prince Liu Sheng and Dou Wan's tomb at Mancheng in Hebei, which included the gilt bronze sculpture of a maid holding a real lamp which could be adjusted so that rays of light could be projected in different directions or made bright or dim; the smoke from the lamp also went into the body of the sculpture, leading Wang Zhongshu to conclude that this was an antipollution device.
  • Page 101-102: In a strange phase of degeneration, the rich and sophisticated patterns achieved in bronzeware production during the Warring States and Western Han became rare during the Eastern Han, as even palace utensils became no exception. "Instead, plain bronzes became popular," that is bronzewares with little decoration. There is speculation as to why this came about. It could have simply been a fashion statement. Or, the refinement of decoration on lacquerwares and the increasing use of the latter might have pushed bronzewares onto a level of lesser importance in terms of daily use as vessels, utensils, etc. However, evidence to the contrary shows that the bronze industry had in now way been diminished in Eastern Han; in fact, the scale of production was further developed. Others speculate that the plainness in most Eastern Han vessels indicates a decline in professional bronze craftsmanship, but this does not sit well with the fact that some Eastern Han bronzewares were still highly decorative.
  • Page 102: Bronzewares were used not only within the palace by the imperial family, as the nobility, government officials, and even mid-to-small landowners purchased and used bronzes. QUOTE: "Their popularity has been substantiated by the excavation of many Han tombs. It is fair to say that precisely because of the simplification of bronze patterns it was possible to produce large quantities of bronzes, thus making them widely popular during the Han."
  • Page 103: Han bronze items included lamps, incense burners, tables, irons, stoves, and dripping jars. "Although bronze lamps existed during the Warring States period, Han lamps greatly exceeded those of the Warring States in variety, quantity, and popularity."
  • Page 103: Even as plain bronzewares became popular, gilded bronzes with thin engraved lines became equally so. Relief casting decoration on bronzes was known in the Han but not before; on a Western Han goblet found in Shanxi and dated to 26 BC, there is relief castings popping out and representing monkeys, camels, oxen, rabbits, sheep, deer, tigers, foxes, bears, wild geese, crows, ducks, birds, and other animals. The Han continued the Warring States practice of inlaying with gold, silver, and precious stones, such as with corals, turqouise and blue gems.
  • Page 103-104: Bronze was also used to make intricate models of carriages, horses, and mounted horsemen. Chinese civilization was one of the first to create bronze mirrors, and there was no shortage of them made during the Han.
  • Page 104-105: The Warring States style of bronze mirrors was the mainstay during the early Western Han, but by the time of Emperor Wu of Han there were mirror types and decorations that were unique and distinctively Han, such as the grass-leaf pattern mirror and star-cloud pattern mirror. Many Western Han mirrors had decorations of the Four Deities (Green Dragon, White Tiger, Red Bird, and Black Turtle). Mirrors with dated inscriptions (of the production date) appear during the Wang Mang interregnum, as this trend persisted in Eastern Han. A new style emerged during Eastern Han as well, with mirrors having cast designs in relief. These new relief mirrors featured decorations of deities, spiritual beasts, human figures on horses or in carriages, etc. Whereas Western Han styles were uniform throughout China, the latter Eastern Han style was developed first in Zhejiang and diffused slowly throughout the country, so that a variety of styles could be found in north and south China.
  • Page 105: QUOTE: "In 1953 an investigation of a Western Han copper-mine site in Xinglong, Hebei Province, disclosed shafts, ore-selection ground, and smelting workshops. The mine shafts were more than 100 m below the ground surface, and led to spacious mining areas. Iron hammers and pegs found near the shafts were the mining tools. Tunnels were dug around the mining area. Ores were selected near the exits of the tunnels and then taken to four nearby smelting workshops. The furnaces seem to have been round brick structures, according to what is left of them."
  • Page 106-107: In addition to the central government and prefectural government production of bronzes for the palace or for government offices, private bronze smelting was also quite common. "Private mirror producers often made use of mirror inscriptions to advertise the superior quality and elegant design of the mirrors they made."

Iron Implements, Weapons, Armor

Ceramics

  • Page 141-142: Gray Pottery. Although gray pottery had existed during the Shang and Zhou, during the Han it surpassed previous gray pottery in quality. Wang states that "It is no exaggeration to say taht in succeeding periods the techniques of gray pottery manufacture did not advance beyond the level attained by the Han potters." The firing was uniform, the firing temperatures reached beyond 1000° C (1832° F), and the finished product was very hard. The larger gray pottery wares ranged from 50 to 70 cm (20 to 28 in) in height. Warring States, Western Han, and Eastern Han kilns found at Wuji in Wu'an County, Hebei province were examined by archaeologists, and it was found that Han kilns had larger chambers, longer fire tunnels, and improved chimney designs compared to earlier kilns. Except for some having parallel bowstring lines, incised geometric patterns, or stamped patterns, most gray pottery was plain and without decoration. The old Neolithic cord mark pattern was rare by Western Han, and virtually died out after that era. Its continued use was not seen in vessels, but it was seen in roof tiles. Some gray pottery vessels had painted designs applied after firing, so the paint on these usually has not survived, flaking easily. Since none of the painted wares were found in residential areas, only in tombs, it is safe to say they were of a funerary use. Some pottery vessels were even covered in lacquer.
  • Page 143: Hard Pottery. Coexisting with the gray pottery was a southern Chinese ceramic type called ying tao, or "hard pottery", made from a strong and dense adhesive clay native only to southern China. (i.e. Guangdong, Guangxi, Hunan, Jiangxi, Fujian, Zhejiang, and southern Jiangsu). Hard pottery was fired at an even higher temperature than gray pottery, while the ceramic paste was harder. They often had a stamped checkerboard pattern or an incised wave or sawtooth pattern.
  • Page 143-145: Glazed Pottery. A new type of glazed pottery with a thick brown or green glaze became prominent, appearing first around Guanzhong in Shaanxi province the mid Western Han Dynasty as well as Luoyang in Henan, and afterwards became widespread and even common by the late Western Han. The brown glazes were the earliest, while the green glazes were an even newer type. The green glaze wares trumped the popularity of brown glaze wares by the Eastern Han period. The glazes of these contain oxidized lead. The firing temperature was relatively low at about 800° C (1472° F). The Shang Dynasty and Zhou Dynasty had glazed ceramics, but these were a lighter green and were fired under much higher temperatures. Han glazed wares imitate some Han bronze wares, while models of granaries, stoves, water wells, towers, and depictions of humans and animals were often made from glazed pottery.
  • Page 145: Celadon. The light-green-glazed stoneware known as celadon was thought to exist only since the Three Kingdoms, but now there are shards of celadon wares that are thought to have been invented during the Eastern Han period in Zhejiang province, in the region of Shaoxing and Shangyu.
  • Page 146-147: The ceramics industry was mostly in the hands of private owners of workshops. However, local governments also operated their own ceramics workshops who stamped their goods to identify which government workshop they were derived from.
  • Pages 147-148: The making of bricks and roof tiles was an important part of the overall ceramics industry in Han. Brick-making began in the Warring States Period, and were used mostly in constructing tombs. The bricks used in tombs had characteristically hollow cores, and were often very large, more than a meter (3.28 ft) in length. In contrast, a smaller brick type that measured 20 to 30 cm (8 to 12 in) long was used for many types of buildings. The square type was used most often for paved floors. The rectangular type was used to build dwellings, granaries, the walls of water wells, water drain holes, and replaced the larger hollow brick in vaulted tomb architecture by the Eastern Han period (a trend which actually began in the Western Han, but did not supersede the use of the large hollow brick at that point). Bricks were not used for building city walls, as the Chinese were content with stamped and rammed earth structures. Han tomb architecture included the feature of wedge-shaped-brick arches and archways. Some bricks featured mortise and tenon joints. Some tomb bricks had decorative motifs stamped onto them.
  • Page 148-149: The oldest pottery roof tiles archaeologists have discovered in China date to the
    Warring States Period, the faces (or eaves) of cylindrical tiles were often semicircular, with plain faces or decorated faces. During the Han, cylindrical roof tiles were often stamped with a cord-pattern decor. The semicircular faces were gradually replaced by full circle ones. Decorations on the face became uniform in design and decoration, from the large cities to the small towns. A common eave pattern was the scrolling cloud motif. Palaces and government halls had impressed character decorations on them indicating the name of the building. Some tiles had auspicious phrases in Chinese characters impressed onto them for decoration. Buildings of a ceremonial nature during the reign of Wang Mang
    had tiles which showed one of the Four Deities on their eave faces.

Tombs

Expansion, Trade, and Foreign Relations

Davis's book

Davis, Paul K. (2001). 100 Decisive Battles: From Ancient Times to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press.

.

Chu-Han Contention

Battle of Gaixia

  • Page 45: This arrangement was short-lived, though, since Liu Bang's advisers urged him that he had enough support from the various kings to assault and destroy Xiang Yu in the east. Add to this the advantage that Chu troops were almost totally exhausted at this point from constant marching and lack of supplies.
  • Page 45: At Gaixia in modern Anhui province, the two forces met. Liu Bang coerced his subordinates to follow him into battle by enticing them with the prospect that they would be given fiefs. Xiang Yu erected a walled camp at Gaixia, while Liu Bang's forces surrounded in the twelfth month of 202 BC. The forces arrayed were allegedly 300,000 under Liu's banner and 100,000 under Xiang's banner. General Han Xin attempted to attack Xiang Yu's center when he led his army out on the field, but his assault was not successful in breaking Chu's formation. However, when two other Han generals attacked from the flanks, the Chu army began to falter, allowing Han Xin to renew his attack on the center. This forced the Chu forces to retreat within their fortified camp.
  • Page 45: After a night of heavy drinking, Xiang Yu fled his camp with 800 cavalry in the early morning. When Liu Bang was awoken and told what had happened, he despatched 5,000 cavalry to pursue them. With only 100 horsemen left, Xiang Yu crossed the Huai River. Since he was completely lost, he stopped to ask a farmer where he was. The farmer tricked him by telling Xiang Yu to go in one direction that actually led to a swamp. It was here that Han cavarly finally reached him and cornered him.
  • Page 45-46: Xiang Yu was convinced that Heaven was against him and that it was no personal fault of his own that he was now in this predicament. To prove this, he planned to ride through the enemy formation and kill an enemy general while also severing banners. He divided his remaining cavalry into four squadrons which departed from the hilltop in different directions. This threw the Han troops into confusion, Xiang Yu did manage to kill a Han officer, and the Chu troops and Xiang Yu managed to meet up on the east side of the river. Then Xiang Yu divided his men into three divisions and attacked the Han troops again. The Han troops responded by dividing their own troops into three and pursuing these three enemy bodies, not knowing which one contained Xiang Yu. Again, Xiang Yu was able to kill another Han officer. Allegedly, he only lost 2 men in this melee, while the Han lost some 50 to 100.
  • Page 46: This moving battle continued southward towards the
    Yangzi River
    , where a boatman offered to ferry Xiang Yu to escape to the other side to safety, but Xiang Yu was not interested in avoiding Heaven's eventual judgment. He gave the boatman his prized horse (which he rode out into combat for the last 5 years), and then led his men (now all dismounted) to face Han for the last time. Xiang Yu became surrounded and was wounded several times. Knowing that there was a price for anyone who brought back his head, he decided to kill himself out of defiance.
  • Page 46: All the forces of Chu surrendered to Liu Bang after Xiang Yu's death, except for those in the city of Lu. Liu Bang was impressed with the city's defiance and courage. He rode up to the city walls himself with the head of Xiang Yu. The city surrendered once they saw the severed head, and Liu Bang treated the surrendered inhabitants courteously. Liu Bang buried Xiang Yu with full honors and did not harm Xiang's family.
  • Page 46: With power vested in him, Liu Bang's followers urged him to take the title huangdi, which he accepted and became Emperor Gaozu of Han, reigning from 202 to 195 BC. Liu Bang became a very well-respected ruler, reversing the ban on books imposed by Qin. However, he did retain the political organization left behind by the Qin empire with its various province administered by governors appointed by the imperial government. Liu Bang also rewarded his faithful generals with fiefs for their services.

Yü's Book

Yü, Ying-shih. (1967). Trade and Expansion in Han China: A Study in the Structure of Sino-Barbarian Economic Relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Introduction: The Problem and Its Origins

  • Page 2: As Ying-shih Yü points out, trade and expansion in the Han Dynasty period was a result of the court's offensive against the Xiongnu and their desire to control various tribal and nomadic groups on the frontiers, so that disturbances and unwanted incursions could be kept to a minimum. The eventual direct trade with Central Asia and indirect trade with states further west was a side benefit, but not the chief goal, which was to suppress hostile components across China's vast frontier borders. In this case, Han expansion was QUOTE: "a means to an end rather than an end in itself." Emperor Wu's expansion of the empire brought about a wave of posthumous criticism by later Western Han ministers. As for Emperor Wu, QUOTE: "Even the expansionist emperor himself issued a decree toward the end of his life expressing his regrets."
  • Page 2-3: Later Emperors, such as Emperor Xuan and Emperor Guangwu, were reluctant to follow the expansionist policy in the Western Regions. This is displayed in many examples, such as the Eastern Han Dynasty's annual aid of 74,800,000 cash given to the states of the Western Regions in comparison to the 100,900,000 cash given yearly to the Southern Xiongnu alone.
  • Page 3: The Han Chinese state's interaction with foreign peoples will also be analyzed in regards to its relation with Confucian thought and the so-called Confucian state.
  • Page 4: The Chinese had a long history of relations and predicaments with northern barbarian groups. For example, the abandonment of the Zhou capital at Hao (near what was to be
    Rong people
    's invasion.

Policy Background and Foundations of Trade

Foreign Policy

  • Page 9-10: Foreign policy decisions in the Western Han Dynasty were focused chiefly on the
    shanyu
    , with a Chinese princess bride. In return, the Xiongnu pledged that they would no longer raid beyond Han China's borders.
  • Page 10-11: Despite this agreement, China's leaders from Emperor Gaozu to Emperor Wu were plagued by the Xiongnu menace, which the heqin policy did not abate.
  • Page 11: During the reign of Emperor Wen of Han, the statesman Jia Yi wrote a long memorial to the throne criticizing the heqin policy, which follows as thus:
The situation of the empire may be described just like a person hanging upside down. The Son of Heaven is the head of the empire. Why? Because he should remain on top. The barbarians are the feet of the empire. Why? Because they should be placed at the bottom. Now, the Hsiung-nu are arrogant and insolent on the one hand, and invade and plunder us on the other hand, which must be considered as an expression of extreme disrespect toward us. And the harm they have been doing to the empire is extremely boundless. Yet each year Han provides them with money, silk floss and fabrics. To command the barbarians is the power vested in the Emperor on the top, and, to present tribute to the Son of Heaven is a ritual to be performed by vassals at the bottom. Hanging upside down like this is something beyond comprehension. . .In your minister's estimation, the population of the Hsiung-nu does not exceed that of a large Chinese hsien or district. That a great empire has come under the contorl of the population of a district is something your minister feels very much ashamed for those who are in charge of the affairs of the empire. Why doesn't Your Majesty try to employ me, your minister, as an official in charge of the shu-kuo or subject states? Should your minister's plan be adopted, your minister would be able to, on the one hand, tie the neck fo the Shan-yü and put his life at our mercy, and, on the other hand, force Chung-hang Yüeh to prostrate himself in order to receive flogging on his back. Moreover, the entire Hsiung-nu people would also be made to obey only the Emperor's order.
  • Page 11: Note, Chung-hang Yüeh QUOTE: "was a Chinese eunuch who was sent to the Hsiung-nu against his will as an escort with a Chinese princess under the reign of Emperor Wen. Out of hatred he therefore devoted himself to the interests of the Hsiung-nu as against those of Han China. He was very much hated by the Chinese as a traitor."
  • Page 12: Jia Yi's suggestions (i.e. that the defensive policy should be changed to an offensive one and that the heqin system should be replaced by a tributary system favoring China) were rejected by the court in his day. However, when the process of renewing the heqin agreement arose in 135 BC, a Court Conference was called into session on how to act. There were two competing factions present at this conference, one led by the Imperial Secretary Han Anguo and the other by Wang Hui, an official who served on the frontier and was knowledgeable in foreign affairs with the nomads. Han Anguo defended the heqin policy while Wang Hui desired to abolish it in favor of an offensive strategy. Han Anguo won the majority consensus of ministers, so the heqin policy was retained by Emperor Wu.
  • Page 12: It would take another court conference in 134 BC to finally convince the majority of ministers present that Wang's policy of attacking the Xiongnu should be implemented; the Emperor bowed to consensus. Thus the break with the Xiongnu and the final end of the heqin agreement occurred the following year in 133 BC.
  • Page 12: The second court conference shifted foreign policy in part because of the enormous financial burden on the Chinese state caused by the flow of tribute into the hands of the Xiongnu. Furthermore, Han generals were constantly defecting to the Xiongnu, weakening the power of the empire to fight back. There was no lasting peace in sight.
  • Page 13: In order to separate the Xiongnu from the peoples they dominated in Central Asia, the Han Dynasty sent diplomats to the Western Regions. Thus an expansionist policy was retained, with some Reformist modification, until the end of Western Han. During Eastern Han, a very different scenario existed since the Xiongnu had already been split between the Northern Xiongnu and Southern Xiongnu. The latter was a tributary of China and living across its frontiers. The former was the enemy faction located further north. Living within the Eastern Han Dynasty's frontiers were tribes of Qiang, Wuhuan, and Xianbei. Thus, the immediate concern was not to expand the empire, but to maintain the various peoples already living within it. Emperor Guangwu of Han did not accept hostages from the states of the Western Regions and rejected any suggestion of mounting an offense against the Northern Xiongnu, deeming interior issues to be much more important.
  • Page 14: As seen in his long memorial in 169 BC presented to Emperor Wen of Han, the statesman Chao Cuo was an advocate of "using barbarians to attack barbarians," a policy of incorporating surrendered Xiongnu horsemen into the Han military, which was eventually adopted (at least by the time of Emperor Wu of Han).
  • Page 14-15: During the Eastern Han, this policy of "using barbarians to attack barbarians" was modified to fit a new situation. The Eastern Han abolished the mandatory military service and conscription systems in favor of volunteer forces. Yet the Han also employed the surrendered nomads living on their frontiers (i.e., the Southern Xiongnu, Wuhuan, Qiang) in the Eastern Han's wars of expansion and suppression of local barbarian rebellions. Surrendered nomads living in Han's frontiers were also put to work doing heavy labor services for local governments. These nomadic barbarians also played a significant role during the wars of the subsequent Three Kingdoms.
  • Page 15: The Han also employed the "divide and rule" technique, which is similar or virtually the same thing as "using barbarians to fight barbarians". For example, when the people of Tonkin revolted in 137 AD, the Han minister Li Gu suggested that the Han should send money and honor one faction of the Vietnamese rebels, so that they would turn and fight each other, a suggestion which worked to the success of Han strategy. Money was used in the same way in dividing the Qiang people when they fougth with Han.
  • Page 16: Enticed by the prospect of imperial rewards, the Xianbei were used by Han to defeat the Northern Xiongnu in 88 AD, a victory gained for Han that did not employ a single Han Chinese soldier. In the same year, when the Yuezhi turned to the Han court for aid in light of the Qiang people's assault on them, the Han court decided it was best not to intervene and just let the barbarians exhaust each other in a fight. The Eastern Han court was comfortable enough to make these decisions, because they faced a multitude of troublesome but small and divided barbarians, whereas the Western Han had faced a gigantic and unified Xiongnu Empire spanning their entire northern border.

Economic and Commercial Policy

  • Page 16-17: Emperor Wu of Han decided not to sit by passively as the Xiongnu raided the borders and took captives; instead he launched military campaigns against them, erected forts and watchtowers along a new frontier, sent garrisons of troops to defend these new fortifications, and when the treasury could no longer support these ventures, he established government monopolies on salt, iron, and liquor. He also established the system of equable marketing. For the time being, these economic reforms were a success and helped pay for the expansionist policies under him.
  • Page 17-18: The economic policy of the Western Han era stressed the importance of agriculture over what it deemed secondary pursuits of commerce and industry. Therefore, the economic policies under Emperor Wu maintained the principle that the government should control industry and regulate commerce. Although this might appear to be unfavorable to merchants, both domestic and foreign trade continued to grow unabated throughout Western Han.
  • Page 18-19: The Eastern Han economic policies were also favorable to the merchants and trade. In defeating his rivals and consolidating his hold over China,
    county
    governments.
  • Page 20-21: However, the local governments' control over salt and iron only existed in intervals. It is apparent from edicts of the Eastern Han that during the reigns of Emperor Guangwu of Han and his successor Emperor Ming of Han, there was an open market and private competition (among merchants) for salt and iron production and distribution. A discussion was made in 81 AD during Emperor Zhang of Han's reign to restore the local government's monopolies, which was instituted sometime between 84 and 86 AD. However, Emperor Zhang apparently regretted reinstituting the local salt and iron monopolies, which turned out to be a failure. The local government's salt and iron monopolies were disbanded when Emperor He of Han took the throne in 88 AD, who stated in his edict that Emperor Zhang had given him posthumous orders to abolish the, QUOTE: "salt and iron monopolies of the various provinces and principalities. The people should be given freedom to engage in salt production and iron casting and pay taxes to the Emperor, as in former cases."

Agricultural and Industrial Resources

  • Page 21: The spread and intensification of agriculture during the Han were owed to the widespread availability of quality iron tools such as the ox-drawn plough capable of turning up deep soil. The Han government even hired experts to teach people how to use agricultural implements.
  • Page 22:
    water wells
    which were used to feed irrigation channels.
  • Page 22: Han farmers cultivated rice, barley, wheat, millet, and soybean. Millet and rice in particular were Han agricultural products in high demand by the Xiongnu.
  • Page 23: Sericulture and the production of silk was handled by the private sphere and government authorities simultaneously. The Western Han central government had two important silk workshops in the capital Chang'an, the East Weaving Chamber and West Weaving Chamber, both of which consumed about 50,000,000 cash annually. Due to government expenses, the East Weaving Chamber had to be shut down in 25 BC while the West Weaving Chamber was renamed simply the Weaving Chamber. The Eastern Han central government also maintained a silk workshop. In addition to central authority, local governments in silk-producing regions also maintained workshops, the most renowned one located in Qi (what is now Shandong). It is recorded that during the reign of Emperor Yuan of Han, the workshops of Qi employed several thousand workers each season and cost the government tens of thousands of cash coins. Sichuan province also had a renowned workshop which produced a fine brocade; it was a central government workshops, since no local government ones are known to have existed there.
  • Page 23-24: Private household businesses selling silk were largely concentrated in Sichuan, especially by the beginning of the Eastern Han. Sichuan was actually well known for its production of hemp clothes during Western Han, in addition to silk.
  • Page 24: Besides silk, lacquerware was an important export item. The lac tree which produced lacquer was found mostly in Sichuan and Henan, which became the main centers of trade for this item. Ten government workshops making lacquer existed during Han, while three of these were located in Sichuan. Although many bear inscriptions, most of them do not; it is believed that the ones which do not were produced by private merchants and household businesses.
  • Page 24-25: The iron industry in China was of supreme importance, as it QUOTE: "not only indirectly accelerated agricultural development, but also directly strengthened the military power of the empire." By the beginning of Western Han, iron weaponry had already outphased that of bronze weaponry. Contemporary Chinese strategists recognized that this made Han China a superior military force. Government workshops for iron under Emperor Wu were established in 40 different provinces. Iron workshops employed several hundred to a thousand workers a day. Convicts and conscripts alike provided the manpower for these iron works. They would receive food and clothing from the government while working. Some iron work sites had as many as twenty furnaces for smelting.
  • Page 26: Before the government takeover of the iron industry in 117 BC, private iron smelters could likewise employ about a thousand workers a day in their workshops. Private iron manufacture existed during Eastern Han, at least in some areas where local authorities did not take over.
  • Page 26-27: The bronze industry was not a government monopoly, but the government did play a role in it. The gathering of copper ore was used to make large amounts of mirrors and coins. During the Western Han, Anhui and Jiangsu were the main areas where copper ores were gathered for bronze production. In the Eastern Han, Sichuan became a major area for gathering copper ore for the same purpose. The Han government established workshops in the capital and in other localities for the production of bronze items, especially mirrors. The Privy Treasurer, one of the Nine Ministers, supervised the government workshops that produced bronzewares.
  • Page 28: Besides the salt and iron industries, the Han government at least played a limited role in all the other major industries, a practice of balancing government and private interaction in industry that remained a hallmark of China's imperial system. The government workshops furnished the emperor's quarters, provided imperial gifts to barbarians, and provided the empire with a steady flow of goods to promote tributary trade.

Transportation System

  • Page 28-29: Although there was a considerable amount of road-building prior to 221 BC, the Qin and Han dynasties surpassed this with their heavy centralized control. During the Han, it was the responsibility of all local governments to look after the maintenance, repair, and construction of their roads. If a local official failed to upkeep the road system in his jurisdiction, he was subject to impeachment.
  • Page 29: Canals were just as useful for agricultural irrigation as they were for transporting the grain produced. The
    Yangzi River
    valley region, all by water travel.
  • Page 30: Trade could also be done by sea. Up until the year 83 AD, tribute from
    Yangzi River, where it would be forwarded to the capital at Luoyang
    .
  • Page 30-31: People on land got around on horseback or riding in carts. It was common for people in the north to own private horses. Carts could be pulled by horses or by donkeys and oxen. Carts pulled by horses were used by government employees for official purposes. During the reign of Emperor Gaozu of Han, the merchants were forbidden to ride in carts pulled by horses, but Yü says this prohibition did not survive after his reign. While horse-drawn carts were used to haul around people, ox- or donkey-drawn carts were used to haul cargo and goods. It was the latter type of cart used by the merchants, since oxen could haul much larger capacities (for commercial goods).
  • Page 31: For example, when a force of Wuhuan nomads halted a Chinese trade caravan in 135 AD on the northwestern frontier, the caravan was said to have more than one thousand carts pulled by oxen.
  • Page 31: Donkeys, oxen, and horses were also made to carry goods on their backs; donkeys were the prime animal used for this purpose. Donkeys were actually imported to China from the Xiongnu, soon to become a favorite animal of the Chinese due to its low price, its patience during travel, and ability to carry heavy loads.
  • Page 31-32: As seen in pottery tomb models, for river transport the Chinese had considerably large ships, which had
    lou chuan
    . For simple means of transport, the Chinese also had the bamboo raft.
  • Page 32-33: For a long time, the public housing facilities along public highways were reserved for official lodging only. However, over time they also came to accomodate private itinerants simultaneously. Since markets sometimes sprang up in the neighborhoods they were located in, it can be hardly doubted that merchants began to lodge in these public houses.
  • Page 33-34: As for the counterpart of private inns, they had a long history in China, known as "traveler's lodge" and "guest house" and "hostel". By the Eastern Han Dynasty, the public housing facilities became largely replaced by private inns and lodges. The growth of private inns in Eastern Han times can be seen as a correlation with the general growth and lack of restrictions placed on commerce and merchant activity.

Sino-Barbarian Economic Relations under the Tributary System

The Xiongnu

  • Page 36-37: As seen in the written evidence of both Jia Yi and the Chinese traitor Zhonghang Yue, both the Han Chinese and Xiongnu were well aware what the heqin agreement was capable of: corrupting Xiongnu customs so that they would forget their nomadic way of life and become enticed by Han material culture, ultimately becoming subdued by the Han. For example, relying on tasty Chinese foodstuffs, instead of relying solely on practical foodstuffs like milk and kumiss which were readily available to the nomads.
  • Page 41: Besides their reliance on their own pastoral herds, the Xiongnu relied on the Chinese economy and acquired goods from it by raiding their borders and stealing the goods directly, by accepting gifts through tribute, or trading with Chinese merchants. Starting in 198 BC and not ending until 133 BC, the second of these categores (i.e. tribute) dominated the means of which the Xiongnu acquired necessary Chinese goods.
  • Page 41-42: The heqin agreement included the following:
    • A Chinese princess was to be married to the
      shanyu
      .
    • The Chinese were to make annual payments to the Xiongnu, which included silk, wine, rice, and other items in fixed amounts.
    • The Han Dynasty and Xiongnu Empire were to treat each other as equal ("brotherly") states.
    • The Great Wall of China would be the demarcation line between their two respective worlds.
  • Page 42: Of all the tribute items which showed the Xiongnu were economically insufficient, the Xiongnu relied most heavily on food and clothes. During the reign of Emperor Wen of Han, the amount of tribute items were increased as cash (in gold or coins) were also added to the list of tributes. During Wen's reign the heqin agreement also incorporated an agreement for the first time on border trade. The exchange of tribute between the Xiongnu and Chinese was largely a one-way traffic, as the meager amount of Xiongnu gifts given to the Han court did not match the exorbitant amount of imperial gifts given to the shanyu. Furthermore, the Xiongnu continually raided Han borders while at the same time demanding increases in tribute. On some occasions the Xiongnu would give the Chinese emperor a couple camels or horses, as a token of "friendship".
  • Page 43: After the heqin agreement broke down and the Xiongnu became severely weakened, they were eventually forced to accept partnership in a tributary system which made China the superior partner. This means that the Xiongnu would have to send hostages to China, would be forced to come to China to pay homage, and had to send tribute in return for the imperial gifts they received.
  • Page 43: After the Xiongnu suffered many defeats by China, Emperor Wu of Han sent his ambassador Yang Xin to negotiate with the shanyu in 107 BC, demanding that the shanyu send his heir apparent to live in Chang'an as a hostage. The shanyu rebuked this and continued to use the language of outdated heqin terms.
  • Page 43-44: After the Xiongnu had suffered a round of defeats, they respectfully called on the Chinese to resume
    shanyu
    to dictate the new terms, the shanyu was outraged and imprisoned the Chinese envoy.
  • Page 44-45: Sour relations continued in this manner until the time of Emperor Xuan of Han (r. 74–49 BC), when the Xiongnu were finally brought into the tributary system that Emperor Wu had tried to implement. After 60 BC, the Xiongnu Empire broke apart into five warring factions. By 54 BC, the Xiongnu became divided into two large branches (Northern and Southern, the former in Outer Mongolia and the latter in Inner Mongolia) that would never coalesce with the same strength to threaten Han China as they had before (they did unite briefly during the reign of Wang Mang, but broke apart into Southern and Northern branches during the reign of Emperor Guangwu of Han, see page 49). When the Southern Xiongnu were defeated and hard pressed by the Northern Xiongnu, the former offered its allegiance to the Han Dynasty for protection in 53 BC. By doing so, they had to abandon the equal "brotherly" status with the Chinese and accept tributary state status instead. The Xiongnu nobles were largely against the idea, which became hotly debated, but in the end their shanyu Huhahye accepted Han tributary terms.
  • Page 45: Under the terms of the new agreement, Huhanye Shanyu sent his son to Chang'an in 53 BC as a hostage while he personally made an appearance at the court in 51 BC, presenting tribute to Emperor Xuan of Han. QUOTE: "The surrender of the Hsiung-nu was by far the most important single event in the history of foreign relations of the Han period. On the one hand, it enhanced the prestige of Han China in the Western Regions to an unprecedented degree, and, on the other hand, it also marked the formal establishment of tributary relations between the Hsiung-nu and Han China. This probably explains why Hu-han-yeh, the Shan-yü of the southern branch, was treated with unusual honors during his stay in the Han capital."
  • Page 45: With the establishment of the tributary system, Han Chinese goods began to flow into the hands of the Xiongnu freely, after over eighty years of interruption. While Huhanye was in the capital in 51 BC, he received 20 catties of gold, 200,000 cash, 77 suits of clothes, 8,000 pieces of various kinds of silk fabrics, and 6,000 catties of silk floss. After he returned home, the Han sent to him 34,000 hu of rice.
  • Page 45-46: When Huhanye came to the Han court again in 50 BC, he was given 110 suits of clothes, 9,000 pieces of silken fabrics, and 8,000 catties of silk. There were many other items, but they are too numerous to mention here (Yü doesn't want to get off-topic!).
  • Page 46: Although the Chinese still granted the Xiongnu with enormous amounts of gifts like in the heqin system, the tributary system was different in that the shanyu was inferior to the Han emperor, he could only receive goods upon written request or when he visited the capital, and goods were no longer in predetermined amounts; instead the emperor used his own discretion when choosing the size of gifts or aid to be given to the Xiongnu.
  • Page 46-47: Here's an example of how an emperor could be swayed to reverse a decision of his based upon a Court Conference majority consensus. The shanyu realized that by visiting the court in person, he was given a greater amount of gifts than when he merely sent in a written petition requesting aid. In 3 BC a Court Conference was called into session when the shanyu requested to come and pay homage the next year in the capital. The majority of ministers agreed that the visit should be turned down since the shanyu's trips were costing China too much. Emperor Ai of Han then approved of the Court Conference's decision and decided to turn down the shanyu's request. However, the Emperor changed his mind when Yang Xiong sent in a lengthy memorial to the throne saying that such an unfriendly attitude would be hurtful to relations and that QUOTE: "political necessity weighed far above its economic undesirability."
  • Page 47-48: The shanyu's retinue usually numbered around 200 each time he came to pay homage, but in 1 BC he requested permission to bring a retinue of 500, which the Emperor reluctantly agreed to, thus the amount of gifts bestowed on the Xiongnu was increased dramatically. This can be seen in the table tabulated below; it was keenly recognized by the
    Song Dynasty historian Sima Guang in his Zizhi Tongjian
    , who noted a trend of ever increasing amounts of silk tribute to the Xiongnu on each visit to the capital:
Imperial gifts given to the shanyu during his visits to the capital
Year (BC) Silk Floss (measured in catties) Silk Fabrics (measured in pieces)
51 6,000 8,000
49 8,000 9,000
33 16,000 18,000
25 20,000 20,000
1 30,000 30,000
  • Page 47-48 continued: As shown here, the amount reached its peak and probably remained at that amount during the reign of Wang Mang. Ying-shih Yü says that it must be pointed out that these numbers are the only ones clearly indicated in the Book of Han. The figures in the table above cannot be viewed as the total amount of silk given to the Xiongnu in this period, since every payment was likely not to be recorded in the Book of Han.
  • Page 48: Han Chinese silk goods and lacquerwares dating to the late 1st century BC/early 1st century AD were found in Xiongnu tombs of northern Mongolia, at the
    Noin-Ula kurgans
    .
  • Page 49: The increasing amounts of silk given to the Xiongnu show how important the tributary system was to the Chinese, so much so that they were willing to pay a heavy price (literally). From scanty amount of evidence it has been proven that the heqin agreement actually had the Chinese handing over less silk than in the tributary system (whatever 10,000 pi of silk means, which was the shanyu's suggested increase in 89 BC).
  • Page 49-50: During the end of Wang Mang's rule, the Xiongnu reunited and took advantage of the Chinese Empire's internal chaos. They began raiding the Chinese frontiers once more, and even attempted to reestablish heqin relations. However, they broke apart into two branches (Northern and Southern) again in 47 AD, while Emperor Guangwu of Han had consolidated the Chinese Empire once more and brought the Southern Xiongnu back into the tributary system in 50 AD (i.e., the shanyu of the Southern Xiongnu sent a hostage prince to the capital, sent tribute, and appeared in the capital to pay homage). This second split of the Xiongnu in 47 AD was a permanent one, because the Northern Xiongnu were a few decades later decimated by the Han Dynasty. In the visit to the capital in 50 AD, the Southern Shanyu received 10,000 pieces of silk fabric, 10,000 catties of silk, 25,000 hu of rice, and 36,000 head of cattle.
  • Page 50: From this point on, Han-Xiongnu relations became regularized. At the end of each year, the Shanyu sent his tribute bearers and a hostage prince, and in return the Chinese handed over the hostage prince of the previous year. Xiongnu envoys received their own set of gifts, as well as the mass of Xiongnu nobility under the shanyu (so not just the shanyu himself was bestowed with gifts).
  • Page 50-51: Evidence that the Xiongnu economy had broken down by this point is the fact that they required gifts of tens of thousands of sheep and cattle from the Han court. The administrator Yuan An (d. 92) remarked in 91 AD that the Later Han provisions given to the Xiongnu amounted to the cash equivalent of 90,000 to 100,000 annually. This is confirmed by a memorial sent by the shanyu in 88 AD, who said that the Xiongnu relied on China for food and each year received gifts numbering in the hundreds of millions. Furthermore, the Xiongnu were required to give the Chinese tribute in return.
  • Page 51: This increase in goods and dependence on these goods most likely correlate with a population expansion. In Huhanye's time (i.e. mid 1st century BC), it is estimated by Yü that the Southern Xiongnu population did not exceed 60,000, but by 90 AD, the total number of Southern Xiongnu is given in the
    Book of Later Han
    as 237,300 people.

The Qiang, Wuhuan, and Xianbei

  • Page 51-52: The Xiongnu defeated and subjugated the Qiang people of Gansu around the same time that the Han Chinese lost at the Battle of Baideng in 200 BC. When the later Emperor Wu of Han invaded the Hexi Corridor, one of his main objectives was to split apart the Xiongnu-Qiang alliance and to befriend the Qiang people.
  • Page 52: The Qiang were a scattered people who began moving into the Chinese frontier to make contact during Emperor Xuan of Han's reign, but they were too scattered to incorporate into the tributary system effectively. Nevertheless, in 98 AD one of the more powerful Qiang tribes paid homage to the Han court during the reign of Emperor He of Han, and in return they received imperial gifts.
  • Page 52-53: As early as the 1st century BC during Western Han, Qiang people were employed to guard the Chinese frontier and interacted with the Chinese on a daily basis. Yet some Chinese took advantage of the language barriers and different customs of their people in order to steal their cattle, women, children, and rob them of other belongings. This enraged the Qiang, who then revolted against Chinese authority. As early as 88 BC, the Xiongnu tried to persuade the Qiang to revolt against the Han under the pretext that the Han were draining their manpower due to the labor services the Chinese had the Qiang perform. As written by Ban Biao in 33 AD and many other Eastern Han writers, the problems of Chinese robbing the Qiang, overworking the Qiang, and the Qiang subsequently revolting against Han continued into the Eastern Han period.
  • Page 53-54: The Wuhuan people, living mostly in southern Manchuria, were subjugated by the Xiongnu during the beginning of the Western Han. They were forced to pay tribute of cattle and furs to the Xiongnu. When the armies of Emperor Wu defeated the Xiongnu, the Wuhuan people were incorporated into the Chinese tributary sphere and regularly paid homage to the Chinese court.
  • Page 54: However, during the end of Western Han, when conditions in China were breaking down, the Xiongnu imposed a tax on the Wuhuan, forcing them to hand over cloth and fur. When the Chinese persuaded the Wuhuan not to pay the Xiongnu any tax, the Xiongnu captured some 1,000 Wuhuan women and children and forced the Wuhuan to pay a steep ransom in cattle, cloth, and fur.
  • Page 54: The Wuhuan became a Xiongnu ally during the reign of Emperor Guangwu of Han, and partook in the raids on Chinese territory. When the Xiongnu realm was split and became weakened in 46 AD, Emperor Guangwu won the Wuhuan back over to the side of Han with gifts of silk and cash. A large group of Wuhuan came to the Han court in 49 AD to pay homage, presenting tribute of slaves, cattle, bows, and animal hides that were complimented by imperial Han gifts given in return. Many Wuhuan became settled across the frontier and were given provisions of Chinese food and clothes.
  • Page 54-55: During Eastern Han, an office was reestablished at Ningcheng in
    Chahar (province) (what is now eastern Inner Mongolia) which dealt with the affairs of Wuhuan and Xianbei tribes. The office was responsible for forwarding gifts to them and forwarding their hostages to Luoyang
    . By the mid 2nd century AD, however, relations began to break down.
  • Page 55: The Xianbei people were also active in Manchuria, but did not become active along the Han Chinese frontier boundaries until the Eastern Han period. Like the Wuhuan, the Xianbei were conquered by the Xiongnu during the beginning of Western Han and were forced to pay tribute. They were militarily stronger than the Wuhuan but were just as economically weak as the Wuhuan. As late as the 2nd century AD, some Xianbei were forced to render military service for the Xiongnu. The Xianbei alternated between submission and rebellion in their relations with Han China, engaging in trade as often as they did plunder along China's northern provinces.
  • Page 55-56: Two Xianbei chieftains paid homage to the Han court in 54 AD, and when it was learned that the Han Chinese were willing to dispense a large amount of gifts, many more Xianbei chieftains submitted in 58 AD. After this, the Han provided them with annual gifts that were valued at 270,000,000 cash! This was three times the value in gifts given to the Southern Xiongnu, a testament to the military strength of the Xianbei.
  • Page 56: However, relations broke down after the Han forces led by general Dou Xian defeated the Northern Xiongnu in 91 AD, forcing them to flee westward. The Xianbei took the opportunity to occupy former Northern Xiongnu lands and absorbed some 100,000 Xiongnu people into their forces. With a sudden and gigantic expansion in land and manpower, the Xianbei began their incursions of northern China. They were not incorporated back into the tributary system until the Yongchu Period (107–113), when they were offered even better economic terms than they were before. The Han regularized trade with them and built two "hostage hostels" in Ningcheng, eastern Inner Mongolia, for hostages of the Xianbei to reside. It is recorded that 121 Xianbei tribes became part of China's tributary system at this time, meaning a lot of hostages had to be overseen. When Eastern Han authority began to break down, the Xianbei became aggressive once more and attacked the northeastern and northern frontiers.

Surrendered Barbarians and Their Treatment

  • Page 65: When a barbarian surrendered to the Han Dynasty, they were subjects of the Chinese emperor but had a unique status. They were seen as candidates to become full members of Chinese society, but in the meantime they were viewed as half-barbarian and half-Chinese.

The Inner and Outer Dichotomy

The Classification of Surrendered Barbarians

Chang's Book

Chang, Chun-shu. (2007). The Rise of the Chinese Empire: Volume II; Frontier, Immigration, & Empire in Han China, 130 B.C. – A.D. 157. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

.

Intro: Virgin Land, National Security, Agricultural Colonization

  • Page 1: The conquests of Emperor Wu brought the limits of the Chinese empire, for the first time in Chinese history, all the way to what is now modern Xinjiang. Yet little about the newly conquered territories is discussed in the official and standard histories. For example, the Hexi Corridor is only given brief mentioning in the Records of the Grand Historian and Book of Han. However, excavated wood and bamboo records which were long lost to history have surfaced to show a nuanced history of the Hexi Corridor, which Chang will use in his book as an example for how the Tarim region may have been administered as well under a colonial system. Documents found from around the Juyan Lake Basin will also form a core part of Chang's analysis.
  • Page 3: In Han times, the Hexi Corridor comprised four prefectures (NOTE: this is 郡jun, which means Chang translates COMMANDERY as PREFECTURE), those being Wuwei, Zhangyi, Jiuquan, and Dunhuang. The Hexi Corridor stretched from the westernmost edges of the Yellow River to the Tarim Basin, located in what is now the modern provinces of Gansu, Ningxia, and Xinjiang (at one time, also a small part of northwestern Qinghai). The Qilian Mountains (also Nan Shan) marked the southern edge of this region, while the northern edges are formed by the Bei ("Northern") Mountains and Heli Mountains.
  • Page 4: Before the Han conquest of the region in 121 BC, the area was inhabited by the
    Qin Dynasty collapsed, the Yuezhi were still the most powerful group in this region, taking voluntary hostages from the others. However, this was upsetted by the Xiongnu (numbering about a million strong), who battled with them from 204 to 203 BC and pushed their community of some 400,000 westward first into Saka territory (around Lake Balkhash) and then later to Daxia (Bactria) in Central Asia (i.e., into the basin of Amu Darya in what is now modern Afghanistan
    ).
  • Page 4-5: Before moving into Bactria, the Yuezhi occupied the Saka territory and in 176 BC fought and killed the leader of the Wusun named Nandoumi (in a place between the
    shanyu
    of the Xiongnu. Lajiaomi accepted Xiongnu dominance while he trained his Wusun in strict military arts. With the consent of the shanyu of the Xiongnu, Kunmo Lajiaomi led his Wusun warriors to fight the Yuezhi in Saka territory from 161 to 160 BC, killing the Yuezhi king and forcing them to move west to Bactria. Kunmo Lajiaomi then occupied Saka territory for his Wusun peoples who were now declared independent from the Xiongnu. The latter had occupied the Hexi Corridor from 177 to 176 BC, and by now had became the sole ruler of that region.
  • Page 5: After the Xiongnu occupied Hexi Corridor in 177 BC, they used it as a staging ground to assault the Chinese border regions of Longxi (in modern southern Gansu) and Beidi (modern northeastern Gansu and southeastern Ningxia). Due to these raids, the Han government maintained heavy garrison defenses along the western edges of the Yellow River.
  • Page 5-6: It was the martial reforms under Emperor Wu of Han in establishing a large cavalry-based army for long-range campaigns that brought about the Chinese conquest of the Hexi Corridor beginning in 121 BC. Two campaigns were led in that year by Huo Qubing, who advanced as far as the middle of the Qilian Mountains, each time with over ten thousand cavalry. Huo allegedly killed or captured 40,000 Xiongnu in these campaigns, which would make up roughly one-third to one-half of all Xiongnu in the Hexi Corridor. The shanyu was outraged and sought to execute the two Xiongnu wise kings in charge of the region, King Hunye and King Xiuchu (both subordinates of the Worthy King of the Right), although these two surrendered their remaining forces to Han before the shanyu could have them killed.
  • Page 6: However, Xiongnu King Xiuchu changed his mind halfway to leading his surrendered forces to Han, splitting off with a rebel detachment of 8,000 Xiongnu. The combined forces of Xiongnu King Hunye and Han general Huo Qubing crushed King Xiuchu's forces and killed him. King Hunye then formally surrendered to Han with 40,000 Xiongnu. Thus, the Hexi Corridor was conquered by Han, incorporated into the Empire, and there was a scarce amount of Xiongnu raids as far as Longxi, Beidi, or Shang (in modern Shanxi) after that point.
  • Page 6: The Han government moved approximately 725,000 people from the Guandong region of central China to the region south of the northern bend of the Yellow River. After further successful campaigns by Huo Qubing and Wei Qing, the Han government moved 60,000 farming officials and soldiers to populate the western side of the Yellow River and build new irrigation works in 119 BC.
  • Page 6-8: The Han built watch stations and forts in Hexi Corridor, but this would not be enough to consolidate such a vast new region that was largely unsettled still by Han Chinese. The Xiongnu posed a constant threat still, so the Han plotted to ally with the Wusun and have them reenter the western areas of the region to block a Xiongnu advance. The diplomat Zhang Qian was even sent out to Wusun territory in 116 BC to convince them to move, but the Wusun leader had no desires to repopulate the old homeland. Therefore the Han had to make concerted efforts to populate the region, with convicts sent as far as Dunhuang in 114 BC in order to cultivate new lands.
  • Page 8: The Qiang people, who numbered some 50,000 at this point, made an alliance with the Xiongnu in 112 BC to push the Han Chinese out of the Hexi Corridor. In a general flank, the Qiang assaulted from the south and the Xiongnu from the north, squeezing in on the Han position. In 111 BC the Han made a massive counterattack of some 100,000 infantry and cavalry to face the Qiang and another 25,000 cavalry—led by Gongsun He and Zhao Ponu—to face the Xiongnu. Both of the latter commanders were successful. After this the Han successfully populated Hexi with garrisoned troops and farming officials to ensure security and growth of agricultural cultivation. Zhangyi and Jiuquan commanderies were settled first, while the commandery of Dunhuang was established in 98 BC and then Wuwei commandery in 72 BC, the latter signifying the full colonization of the region.
  • Page 9: When the Han people spoke of establishing a new frontier, such as in the proposal headed by Sang Hongyang in 89 BC to populate what is now Luntai County, they always referred to the establishment of watch stations. New frontiers were commanded by a military officer, yet civilian laborers working for the government migrated there to cultivate new lands in order to create self-supporting communities on the new frontier. When a chief commandant (duwei) was assigned to a frontier region, that was a sign that the area had become cultivated and populated enough to warrant his presence and command.
  • Page 9-10: A chief commandant was assigned to an area that already harbored many fortresses, each under a single commandant who had their own subordinate officers.
  • Page 11-12: When a
    county (xian)
    was established in an area once solely commanded by a chief commandant, a new county magistrate then handled all civilian affairs, while the chief commandant was relegated to handling only military affairs.
  • Page 13: From 108 to 101 BC, the Han built an effective system of watchtowers and signal stations stretching from
    Jade Gate in Gansu, and into the Lop Nur area. By 103 BC, the Han had built a cluster of watch stations that could be found at Khara-Khoto in what is now Inner Mongolia. When Zhangyi and Jiuquan
    were established in 111 BC, the first known buildings erected in these territories were for watch stations.

Han Frontier System: Origins, Theories, and Patterns

Han Colonists: Organization, Composition, and Character

Interesting Facts About Social Class

  • Page 62: An interesting little fact here about monetary prerequisites to become a government official, QUOTE: "There was a property qualification for official appointment, the philosophical rationale for which was that wealthy officials were less vulnerable to corruption. At the beginning of the dynasty, the Han Court made total assessed taxable wealth of one hundred thousand coins (the average wealth of a "middle class" family) the minimum property qualification for official appointment, but in 142 B.C. it lowered the requirement to forty thousand coins. Beginning with Wu-ti's reign, this rule was no longer strictly enforced. But the Chü-yan document confirms its practice on the frontier, though probably in a modified fashion."
  • Page 68: QUOTE: "In ancient China, as in modern times, old age was a source of great respect because the Chinese, then as now, regarded old age as a source of wisdom, on one hand, and were guided by the moral imperative of filial piety on the other. This ethical and social ideology was ingrained in the Chinese political culture. In Han times, not only was respect for the elderly mandated through legal instruments, but emperors frequently decreed that the elderly of the empire be given special treatment by government officials and be granted special privileges. Exemption from severe punishment was one such privilege. In 195 B.C., Emperor Hui issued an edict, ordering that commoners aged seventy and over be declared exempt from mutilating punishment. Several other emperors decreed that people age eighty and over were to be exempt even from severe interrogation and adjudication for crimes other than false accusation and murder. But for all such special privileges granted to the elderly the lower age limited was always seventy." However, a person who was demoted from aristocratic rank was not treated as a commoner who was only exempt at age 70, since a former aristocrat (now a commoner) had the privilege of being exempt from mutilating punishment at age 60.
  • Page 69: QUOTE: "As we discussed in an earlier chapter, the rank holders corresponded in many respects to the gentry class of the later period, except that those holding a high rank were more privileged and influential. The social stratification sketched in table 13 represents a transitional class structure between the Chou feudal system, which was based on birth and kinship, and the rising new system mainly based on landownership and education. In the Chou feudal system, the class structure was the society itself; in the later system, the class structure was first the creation of and then the basis for the political culture, particularly the bureaucratic system, which was baded on the idea of meritocracy. The Former Han social stratification lies between the two in time and structure. In recruitment, mobility, institutional means of perpetuation, and political awareness and function, the Former Han ruling class represented a transition from the Chou feudal nobility to a landed class of literati-gentry."

Construction and Structure of Han Settlements

  • Page 91-92: The walled district or city was the largest type of settlement in the frontier region, and there were really only two of them in the region of Juyan. These was Juyan City located in what is now Khara-Khoto. The other was Jianshui City located at modern Taralingin-durbeljin. Juyan city had a rectangular grid design, covering an area of 171,000 square meters (1,840,628 square feet), or 380 meters (1,246 feet) by 450 meters (1,476 feet). Qianshui occupied a lesser area of 87,500 square meters (941,842 square feet), or 350 meters (1,148 feet) by 250 meters (820 feet). Both cities were constructed of stamped clay bricks, not rammed earth like in most other cities of the interior.
  • Page 92: Fortresses were more irregularly shaped, considerably smaller, and also built of stamped clay bricks. The surface area of the fortresses ranged from 500 square meters (5,381 square feet) to a meager 23 square meters (247 square feet). Fortresses served as the headquarters for commandants (ranked just below a chief commandant), who oversaw commandant areas.
  • Page 92: The smallest fortified unit was the watch station, with a watchtower as its central building and a surrounding wall. The areas of some watch stations were about 60 square meters (645 square feet). The watchtower at the center had a base that measured 6.5 m (21 ft) on each side and had a height of 12 m (39 ft). The watch station was built of stamped clay, while wood, hay, and other materials were used. Watchtowers could be headed by a commander or a subcommandant, and in some cases both.
  • Page 94: Residential buildings were often built alongside the walls of these settlements.
  • Page 94: A li was a ward, and was both an administrative unit and residential division in Han times. It was administered by the county government, and each ward had about fifty families. It often had low-lying walls and two entryways or gates, one gate located along the southern wall and one along the northern wall. Furthermore, a walled ward was partitioned into two sections (northern and southern) with a wall running east to west that had a passage gate called a yan.

Conclusion

Di Cosmo's Book

Di Cosmo, Nicola. (2002). Ancient China and Its Enemies: The Rise of Nomadic Power in East Asian History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

.

Miscellaneous

Modun's Rise to Power

Conflict during Liu Bang's reign

  • Page 190-192: In 200 BC, the Xiongnu attacked Taiyuan, then under the control of King Xin of Hán; note that this "Hán" was just a kingdom, not the main ruling dynasty "Hàn". The Han Kingdom's character is 韩 while the Han Dynasty's character is 漢, the latter named after Hanzhong. Anyways, King Xin made a pact with the Xiongnu to rebel against the Han Dynasty. The Xiongnu then invaded Taiyuan Commandery. Liu Bang personally led Han Dynasty forces against the Xiongnu and the rebellious Kingdom of Han. Despite the frigid cold weather, Liu's troops pushed on to Pingcheng (located northeast of modern Datong, Shanxi).
  • Page 192: Modu allegedly moved with 400,000 cavalrymen (this number is almost certainly bloated beyond realistic logistics) to surround Liu Bang's troops at Pingcheng by blocking them at Baideng Mountain; what ensued was the Battle of Baideng. After seven days of fighting, Han troops were allowed to withdraw. Later, a treaty was made between both sides where the Xiongnu extracted tribute from Han as part of the conditions.
  • Page 192: Meanwhile, King Xin became a Xiongnu general. He disobeyed the terms of the treaty and raided Tai and Yunzhong commanderies. Other Han generals and nobles then began to revolt against Liu Bang, who was forced to suppress them in a campaign led by Fan Kuai (not to be confused with this Fan Kuai, who died earlier in 204 BC).
  • Page 192: It was all apparent to Liu Bang that Han's charioteers and infantry were no match for Xiongnu cavalry, so diplomatic means had to be employed. By paying a large amount of tribute to the Xiongnu and acknowleding an inferior position, Liu Bang initiated the heqin (harmonious kinship) system in 198 BC.
  • Page 193: The councillor Liu Jing (劉敬) had, from the onset, advised Liu Bang not to attack the Xiongnu. It was this minister who was the architect of the
    Modu Shanyu
    . The scheme was to have Modu become the Liu Bang's son-in-law. Modu's son and heir to the Xiongnu throne would thus be a grandson of Liu Bang, thus this half-Chinese and half-Xiongnu grandson would be in a subordinate position to the Emperor of Han. The other strategy was to corrupt the Xiongnu values by sending them lavish luxury items as tribute, which the Han already had in exorbitant amounts. Yet the third strategy involved indoctrination; Han rhetoricians would be sent to the Xiongnu where they would teach them Chinese Confucian values of how youths should respect and bow to the demands of their elders, especially a grandson to his grandfather, thus ensuring that Liu Bang's grandson-to-be would be under his control. This policy was accepted by Liu Bang in 199 BC, and was implemented in 198 BC.
  • Page 193-194: Although the Chinese accepted an inferior position, the terms of the treaty actually made both sides equal in status. An official marriage alliance bound both houses of Xiongnu and Han, while the Han agreed to send annual tribute of silk, cloth, wine, grains, and other foodstuffs. The diplomatic status of
    shanyu became equal to that of huangdi, as evidenced by the rulers defining their relationship as "brotherly". In 162 BC, Emperor Wen of Han
    even made the analogy that the shanyu of Xiongnu and emperor of China were like the father and mother of the people, and that Heaven does not cover just one side, and "Earth is not partial to anyone."
  • Page 194-195: However, the relationship was unequal in that the Han continued to pay tribute to a powerful military state. The Chinese were deeply insulted by Modu's marriage proposal to the Empress Dowager Lü Hou (or
    Empress Lü Zhi
    , wife of Liu Bang), yet even this affront did not stop the heqin relationship.
  • Page 195: A Court Conference debate was held in 135 BC during Emperor Wu of Han's reign (see chapter 6), where the initial consensus was to retain the heqin system, yet it was soon after abandoned for an aggressive military policy.
  • Page 195: The Xiongnu were effective because they had absorbed tons of different tribes which were placed under a heavily centralized command. On the other hand, Han soldiers did not have experience fighting nomads and there was a general lack of discipline among commanders who were drawn from the aristocratic order and QUOTE: "whose loyalty to the emperor could not be taken for granted."
  • Page 195: Even though sending the Xiongnu "brides and bribes" appeased the Xiongnu to the piont where open warfare was not an issue, there were still many times when the Xiongnu asked the tribute amount to be increased and where Xiongnu raided Han borders.

Relations during Wen and Jing's reigns

  • Page 196: During the reign of
    Great Wall
    would be ruled by the Xiongnu, while everyone south of the Great Wall would be ruled by Han China.
  • Page 197: The implementation of this concept of a dual world order can be seen even in the capture of Zhang Qian by the Xiongnu in 138 BC. Zhang had been sent north to seek an anti-Xiongnu alliance with the Yuezhi. The displeased shanyu of the Xiongnu explained to Zhang, QUOTE: "The Yüe-chih lie to the north of us, how can the Han send their envoys there? If I wished to send envoys to Yüeh [a state to the south of China] would the Han allow me to do so?" With this statement, it becomes clear that Zhang had violated the terms of the 162 BC treaty; don't fuck with things outside your sphere of influence.
  • Page 197: The Xiongnu came to dominate the Western Regions (i.e. Tarim Basin) when their offensive against the Yuezhi displaced the later from their original base which was near Dunhuang. They fled and escaped west to conquer Daxia (Bactria), and afterwards the Yuezhi king established his official court north of the Gui River in Guangxi.
  • Page 197-198: The tiny states east of
    Loulan
    , paid tribute to the Xiongnu and acted as their eyes and ears when Han envoys visited. Any state found to submit to Han was punished by ruthless military action, hence envoys sent by the shanyu were treated cordially and provided escorts, while Han envoys couldn't even acquire horses and food from their hosts. The Xiongnu obviously regarded the Western Regions as their domain, and their domination of it feuled their economic strength.
  • Page 198: However, the Han continued to compete with the Xiongnu over the Western Regions. For example, the oasis state of
    Loulan
    sent prominent hostages to both the Xiongnu and Han courts (this was a common practice of an overlord state's demand of its lesser state, as the lesser state was less likely to rebel if, let's say, one of its princes were in the hands of the overlord state). The Xiongnu beat the Han to the punch by installing a Loulan king who was friendly to their side, but the Han counteracted this by sending in a secret agent to assassinate the king.
  • Page 198-199: To undermine the paramountcy of the Xiongnu in the north, Zhang Qian suggested to Emperor Wu of Han that a brotherly alliance be made with the Wusun, which would be like cutting off a right arm of the Xiongnu, and states as far away as Bactria could be induced to become a Han vassal. Indeed, Emperor Wu then sent a bride to wed the leader of the Wusun.
  • Page 199-200: Long before this, though Emperor Wen of Han set forth a reform to put Han on equal footing with the Xiongnu, that is, converting a significant proportion of his infantry into cavalry forces. However, much of these forces were stationed in the capital for defending the heart of the empire, and were not meant to garrison the far frontier or even lead offensive expeditions into Xiongnu soil. For now, Wen resorted to the heqin system of tribute and intermarriage. In essence, the Han built a permanent standing army at the capital, while Emperor Wen did beef up border garrisons a bit due to constant Xiongnu raids, some of which involved tens of thousands of Xiongnu invading a commandery for a given time then retreating some months later after sufficient plunder. In 166 BC and 158 BC, the word "invasion" would be better than "raid" to describe the Xiongnu movements of tens of thousands and the Chinese armies drawn up to repel these movements.
  • Page 201: The level of plunder propagated by the Xiongnu during Emperor Wen's reign was significantly reduced during the subsequent reign of Emperor Jing of Han. This is because Emperor Jing decided to establish border markets and loosen restrictions on contraband trade at the border. The result was a reduction in raids and the size of the raids became mere skirmishes instead of invasions of tens of thousands of cavalry.
  • Page 201-202: The statesman Jia Yi (200–168 BC) represented the court faction during Emperor Wen's time which was in favor of a vertical relationship with the Xiongnu and attacking them instead of paying tribute. Jia Yi believed that Chinese civilization, with its refined rituals, was inarguably superior to the Xiongnu, and any Han Chinese statesman who aided and abeted the Xiongnu cause was a traitor to the Han Dynasty. Furthermore, he urged the emperor to make the Xiongnu submit, yet did not come up with a formal proposal on how to achieve this. His ideas were dismissed and the heqin policy prevailed under Emperor Wen. However, Jia Yi's attitude about vertical diplomacy could surely be paralleled with how Wang Mang addressed the Xiongnu leader (i.e. "Submitted Caitiff of the Surrendered Slaves").
  • Page 202-203: The advisor Chao Cuo (晁錯, d. 154 BC) advised the court of
    Chinese culture
    was unequivocally superior, but because it failed to produce the results that it set out to achieve, which was peace, stability, and equal relationship with the Xiongnu. Chao was a master military strategist, and he studied Sino-Xiongnu relations and ways to improve the outdated Chinese military, border defenses, and socio-economic frontier management.
  • Page 203: Displaying his extensive knowledge of the Han and Xiongnu military weaknesses and advantages, Chao Cuo wrote in a memorial presented to Emperor Wen's throne in 169 BC, QUOTE: "The configuration of terrain and fighting ability fo the Hsiung-nu differ from those of China. Going up and down mountain slopes, and crossing torrents and streams, the Hsiung-nu horses are better than the Chinese. On dangerous roads and sloping narrow passages they can both ride and shoot arrows; Chinese mounted soldiers cannot match that. They can withstand the wind and rain, fatigue, hunger and thirst; Chinese soldiers are not as good. These are the qualities of the Hsiung-nu. However, on a level terrain in the plains, using light chariots and swift cavalry, the Hsiung-nu rabble would easily be utterly defeated. Even with strong crossbows that shoot far, and long halberds that hit at a distance, the Hsiung-nu would not be able to ward them off. If the armors are sturdy and the weapons sharp, if the repetition crossbows shot far, and the platoons advance together, then the leather outfit and wooden shields of the Hsiung-nu will not be able to protect them. If they dismount and fight on foot when swords and halberds clash as [the soldiers] come into close quarters, the Hsiung-nu, who lack infantry training, will not be able to cope. These are the advantages of China. If we look at this situation, the Hsiung-nu have three advantages, while China has five." This entire memorial was quoted in the Records of the Grand Historian.
  • Page 203-204: Moreover, Chao Cuo suggested in the same memorial that light infantry should be used against the Xiongnu, not infantry or charioteers. He also proposed that surrendered nomadic peoples, whether they be Xiongnu or Yuezhi, should be incorporated into the defensive military units of Han border garrisons, led by Chinese generals who understood their langauge and customs. This was the strategy of "using 'barbarians' to control the 'barbarians'" in Western Han, otherwise known as "using foreigners to attack foreigners".
  • Page 204-205: To make matters worse for the Western Han central government, the continual Xiongnu raids at the border not only necessitated moving tens of thousands of Han Chinese cavalry to repel them, but each time they did more Han nobles from the semi-autonomous kingdoms difected to the Xiongnu or used the chaos as an opportunity to rebel.

The Case for War

  • Page 206: Discarding decades of
    Zhizhi Chanyu, who fought against the Han Dynasty until he was killed at the Battle of Zhizhi
    in 36 BC). Moreover, the duality of two great powers in East Asia was no more, as China became the greatest power of the East.
  • Page 210: Statesmen such as Jia Yi and Chao Cuo provided some of the earliest arguments for scrapping the heqin policy and installing an aggressive military policy, but the latter wasn't seriously considered by the court until the scholarly debates of 135–134 BC during Emperor Wu of Han's reign. This Court Conference is used as a prologue in the Book of Han before discussing the misguided venture of the Battle of Mayi (133 BC), where Han troops failed to capture the shanyu of the Xiongnu.
  • Page 210-211: The Xiongnu shanyu sent word to Chang'an in 135 BC, as the heqin treaty was about to expire and needed to be renewed, an event which sparked debate in the capital. Leading the debate at the Court Conference on either factional side were ministers Wang Hui and Han Anguo. Wang Hui argued that the heqin arrangement did not stop the Xiongnu from performing massive raids into Han territory, thus military force should be used against them. Han Anguo argued that heqin should be continued since it would be futile to send Han armies far into the wilderness to pursue the Xiongnu, as northern nomads were never conquered since even antiquity and the Xiongnu were better fighters in their own territory, able to trounce Han troops as proven before. Han Anguo argued that if Han armies spent too much time in the field, they would easily become exhausted and fall prey to bandits. Wang Hui rebutted by saying heqin was no permanent solution either. In this first Court Conference of 135 BC, Han Anguo gained the support of the majority of the ministers, so consensus in favor of his proposal to retain heqin won the day.
  • Page 211: In the second Court Conference taken place in 134 BC, when Nie Wengyi of Mayi convinced the high minister Wang Hui present his proposal that the Xiongnu shanyu should be lured to Mayi with the promise of gifts, where Han troops waiting in ambush would slaughter him. Di Cosmo writes that this Court Conference was most likely called into session due to the Emperor's aggrieved position with the Xiongnu, who were busy raiding the Chinese border while waiting for the Han to ratify a new heqin treaty.
  • Page 211-212: In the debate, Wang Hui presented pretty much the same argument, only slightly different. He noted that the Dai state during the Warring States Period was able to defend itself from the nomads and keep them from pillaging, but the great Han which united a gigantic empire could do barely anything to stop their raids. In his view, there was no other alternative but to stage an offensive. Han Anguo introduced his argument by first pointing out the humiliation of Emperor Gaozu of Han at the Battle of Baideng, a futile act which led to the very heqin policy being discussed, a policy that had so far provided relative peace for five generations. Han Anguo argued that it was wise to know one's limits, and even the Han Empire had its limits; hence, potentially disastrous conquests should be avoided. He praised Emperor Wen of Han for not conquering an inch of Xiongnu territory and renewing the treaty with them.
  • Page 212: To these points of Han Anguo, Wang Hui made this rebuttal, QUOTE: "Not so! I have heard that the Five Emperors did not follow each other's rituals, and the Three Kings did not repeat each other's music. This is not because they antagonized each other, but because every one followed what was appropriate to the epoch. Moreover, Kao-ti personally dressed in a strong armor, and armed with sharp weapons, hiding in fogs and mists, immersed in snow and frost had fought continuously for over ten years, and therefore he could not avenge the outrage of P'ing-ch'eng. Without force there is no ability, and therefore he put the hearts of the empire at rest. Today, however, there are frequent alarms along the frontiers, the soldiers are wounded and killed, and in China funerary processions follow one after the other. This is what grieves the benevolent man. For this reason I say that it is appropriate to strike."
  • Page 212: Di Cosmo clarifies that one point made by Wang Hui about Liu Bang, explaining that Liu had fought a long civil war and was in no position to continue fighting with the lack of resources and instability of his realm. Therefore he could not seek revenge for Baideng.
  • Page 212-213: Han Anguo replied to this by saying it would be nearly impossible to try and capture the Xiongnu, as they "arrive like a sudden wind and leave like a disappearing lightning. Their occupation is raising animals, they go hunting with bow and arrow; they follow their animals according to the availibility of pasture, and their abode is not permanent; they are difficult to capture and control. As for the present, since long they have caused the border regions to abandon tilling and weaving in order to support the common activities of the nomads. Their strength cannot be matched in a balanced way. For this reason I say it is not convenient to attack." Di Cosmo comments here that Han Anguo effectively displayed knowledge of the nomads' advantages and their absorbing of China's northern frontier regions into their sphere of economic influence.
  • Page 213: Wang Hui retorted by saying wise men act according to circumstance; when given the chance, Emperor Mu of Zhou defeated the Rong people and expanded his territory; the Qin general Meng Tian was able to take the Ordos region, opening up thousands of miles of land and building fortresses so that the Xiongnu "did not dare water their horses in the Yellow River". Furthermore, he said that the Xiongnu could not be cultivated with benevolence extended by the Chinese court; they could only be dealt with by using force. Wang Hui also pointed out that the Xiongnu's political position was rather unstable, as northern peoples dissatisfied with their subjugation by the Xiongnu could be persuaded to turn against their overlords, and explicitly mentioned the Yuezhi as a potential ally in such a scheme.
  • Page 213-214: Di Cosmo says that Han Anguo began to lose ground in the debate after Wang made this point, as Han merely repeated and reinforced his point about how the Xiongnu could not be fought in their own territory. Wang rebutted this by saying that penetrating deep into Xiongnu territory was not his proposal at all. It is at this moment where he introduced Nie Wengyi's plot to have the Xiongnu shanyu ambushed at Mayi under false pretense of providing him with gifts. In this way, Wang recognized that Han Anguo made a great point that prolonged wars fought in Xiongnu territory would be disastrous, but a limited engagement along the border with the capture of their leader would bring about political chaos for the Xiongnu, who would be likely to submit if not be severely weakened.
  • Page 213-214: Wang's idea, unfortunately, did not work in the field, as the botched Battle of Mayi proved to be disastrous for Han, since the shanyu did not fall into the intended trap and humiliated the Han armies. However, the unintended effect of this battle was that it proved to the Han ministers debating the subject that the Xiongnu did not obey peace treaties, they remained a constant threat, and limited engagement like the approach seen at Mayi did not work, so full-scale military action was the only other solution.

Heqin and Weakness of the Shanyu

  • Page 217-218: Di Cosmo states QUOTE: "A close examination of the actual treaty violations by the Hsiung-nu suggests that in various instances it was not the ch'an-yü himself who violated a particular agreement, but his subordinate leaders or Chinese commanders who had defected to the Hsiung-nu. Possibly, then, the central point in this matter could be identified in the discrepancy in the power that each of the parties 'singing' the treaty had to guarantee that the letter of the treaty would be respected by the entire body politic formally under his authority."
  • Page 221: Unlike the near absolute authority of the Han emperor in his centralized system of government, Di Cosmo says that the Xiongnu shanyu never had parallel absolute authority over his subjects; rather, he was a QUOTE: "first among equals, whose position of primacy rested ultimately on the consent obtained from other chieftains and members of the tribal aristocracy. This consent could be coerced, but the ultimate foundation of the charismatic leader was the voluntary consensus obtained from his closest advisors, military commanders, and family members, without whom his rise to power would be impossible. These 'electors' could not be kept in a position of absolute subordination." In other words, despite the fact that he was able to mobilize all the tribes from the center during war campaigns, he could not force everyone to obey him at every moment.
  • Page 224: The wise king of the right was in clear violation of the treaty between the shanyu and Emperor Wen of Han when in 176 BC he crossed the Yellow River and raided Chinese territory. The shanyu was frustrated about this too, putting part of the blame on Han officials who provoked him, but the wise king failed to inform the shanyu of his intentions and instead followed the advice of other Xiongnu leaders to invade.
  • Page 225: During the reigns of Emperor Jing of Han and Junchen Shanyu (r. 159–126 BC), the Xiongnu invasions and raids of Han territory were most likely not instigated by Junchen Shanyu, since the heqin agreement did not break down and border markets continued to stay open.
  • Page 225-226: Huyenti Shanyu (r. 85–68) desired to form a new heqin agreement with Han, but his two aristocratic subordinates, the wise king on the left and wise king on the right, opposed him due to their jealousy and resentment of not becoming shanyu themselves. They first sought to create an alliance with the Han Dynasty, then figured they should side with the Wusun and attack Huyenti Shanyu, then thought best just to stay in their territories and ignore Huyenti Shanyu. Thus, the heqin system was still used to divide the Xiongnu. This is made most explicit with the reign of Huhanye (r. 58–31 BC), who split the Xiongnu to lead the Southern Xiongnu in order to retain the right to receive Chinese goods. "This was possible because of the relative ease with which members of the Hsiung-nu aristocracy could secede from the larger political union. Going back to one's own territory was an option open to the nobility that the ch'an-yü had no legal power to oppose, and one that reveals the inherent weakness of his authority."

War and Expansion

  • Page 227-228: From 121 to 112 BC, the armies of Emperor Wu conquered and expanded Han territory far beyond what any previous state had achieved, while the unity of the Xiongnu became forever broken by the 1st century BC.
  • Page 228-229: In the Discourses on Salt and Iron, the "ministerial" faction argued that interventionism and expansionism by Han was a matter of using offense as your best defense, as fighting the enemy in their territory meant keeping the realm of Han safe. At the same time, the surplus of Chinese goods could be traded in new trade routes leading west for immense profits. The "literati" faction argued against expansion, saying that the state would exploit the welfare of the people for its own ends and prolonged war campaigns that would drain the economy. They argued that the importation of foreign goods did not match the quality of domestic goods already produced in China.
  • Page 229: However, the limited objectives of these positions failed to address the justification of the enormous expansion under Emperor Wu and subjugation of states which were either hostile or not hostile. The reasons for subjugating states along the way can be seen as the Han Dynasty's need for a line of fortifications providing logistical support as Han armies pushed farther northwest in their offensive against the Xiongnu. In order to truly defeat the Xiongnu, the Han also had to sever the economic and political links which the Xiongnu had with various polities in the Western Regions, which feuled the power of the Xiongnu. It was the implementation of this strategy which eventually broke the Xiongnu Empire apart.
  • Page 230-231: Up until the reign of Emperor Wu, the powerful Xiongnu offered a viable alternative to the nobles' allegiance to Han, as many subordinate kings and generals desired autonomy, and when their revolt did not succeed, the Xiongnu could provide sanctuary. The conflict of Liu Bang with his once trusted general Han Xin and then Lu Wan (the latter the King of Yan who fled to the Xiongnu) clearly demonstrates this.
  • Page 231: Although the Chinese had been using
    Liu Bang which fought the Xiongnu were primarily composed of infantry and charioteer
    forces. When Chao Cuo requested in his memorial of 169 BC that cavalry forces should be used against the Xiongnu, this was a clear indication that the Han armies still had not sufficiently adopted a strong cavalry-based army. This would change under Emperor Wu.
  • Page 232: The problem facing early Western Han rulers was the amount and availability of horses. The Han imported horses from the Xiongnu and other northern peoples along the border, but this would become insufficient in times of war with the Xiongnu, as the Xiongnu could simply cut off the trade when it was most needed. The Han thus had to breed horses in China, preferably in frontier areas with little inhabitation or agricultural cultivation. By 140 BC, during the early reign of Emperor Wu of Han, the mass-breeding of horses had finally become established, as thirty-six breeding grounds on the frontiers maintained some 300,000 horses.
  • Page 232: However, when the military campaigns of 129 to 119 BC deep into Xiongnu territory depleted a large amount of the horses that the Han required, the breeding grounds were simply not enough to solve the problem. The Han government then decided to establish a simultaneous system with the breeding grounds that would involve all of China, that is, the encouragement of private breeding. Individual subjects could breed their own horses anywhere, which the state could then purchase as needed. Under Emperor Wu, QUOTE: "A new tax law stipulated that up to three men in any family could be exempted from military duties by presenting one horse each for the army. Finally, a portion of the revenues from the poll tax on children (k'ou-fu) was earmarked specifically for the purchase of horses for the military. Already in 146 B.C. the export of horses under ten years of age was forbidden, and horses remained a much sought-after commodity."
  • Page 233: For some time the Chinese had imported superior, tall and high-quality stallions from Central Asia, while the campaign of Li Guangli in 104–101 BC (against Dayuan) was specifically intended to gain this type of horse through tribute. Beyond trade and tribute, the Han also gained the superior Central Asian stallion by means of capturing them from the Xiongnu during battle.
  • Page 233-234: It was one thing to have horses, and another to train professional cavalrymen. The creation of cavalry forces intended specifically for frontier service was established as far back as 178 BC. In the campaigns of 129 to 119 BC they became essential for victory against the Xiongnu. From 130 BC to 23 AD, there were two types of Han soldiers: the bing who were salaried volunteers providing temporary or permanent service; the zu were conscripts used primarily for labor and guard duty. The bing established under Emperor Wu were essentially specially trained soldiers who could serve as infantry or cavalry, accompanied by auxiliary troops of mounted nomads (the latter often used as frontier guards).
  • Page 234: The great amount of horses and newly trained cavalrymen were supplemented by the Western Han defensive trends of replacing old-style copper-and-hide armor with iron-plated armor and helmets. Plus the Han Dynasty Chinese had the handheld
    Li Ling (Han Dynasty)
    (d. 74 BC) where he succeeded despite having only infantry who were completely outnumbered by the Xiongnu cavalry.
  • Page 234-235: There was one great disadvantage to offset these new advantages, and that was the continual problem of logistical support and supplies. On the frontiers, the state managed farms run by conscripts to provide food, built garrisoned forts far into the wilderness, and lit beacon fires for communication. However, the range of effectiveness of frontier defenses and supports were limited, and once an army ventured far into Xiongnu territory, they had no support. They could pillage Xiongnu livestock and other items, but this was a marginal supplement to the needs of a large army. To improve logistical support and supplies, the Han built a string of forts where garrisons protected granaries full of food and warehouses full of money and weapons. In addition, temporary storehouses could be set up for campaigns, filled with money, weapons, and food. This strategy also fit into the scheme of eventually transforming recently conquered frontiers into viable Han commanderies.

Phases of Conquest under Emperor Wu

FIRST PHASE OF CONQUEST (133–119 BC)
  • Page 236-237. The first phase of conquest under Emperor Wu was aimed at recovering and consolidating all the land lost south of the western bend of the Yellow River. The defeat at Mayi was a setback, but a large offensive began in 129 BC which was led by four commanders.
  • Page 237: The 129 BC campaign was directed by General of Chariots and Cavalry Wei Qing, the General of Light Chariots Gongsun He, the Grand Palace Grandee Gongsun Ao, and Commandant of the Guards Li Guang. It was recorded that each general commanded a force of ten thousand cavalry. Wei Qing was the only general who achieved success, in that he ventured as far as Longcheng, sacred site of the Xiongnu, where he killed and captured several hundred. However, Gongsun He did not achieve anything of merit, Gongsun Ao lost seven thousand of his cavalry, and Li Guang was taken prisoner (he later escaped). The latter two generals were demoted to commoner status.
  • Page 237-238: The Xiongnu went on the counteroffensive in 128 BC, invading what is today's Liaoning where they killed the governor of Liaoxi Commandery (west of Daling River) and invaded Yanmen where several thousand were killed or captured. Wei Qing was sent to repel them while Han Anguo was given command to guard Yuyang (he later quit this position after the Xiongnu fled far away). A month later, the Xiongnu assaulted Shanggu Commandery in northern Hebei. In 127 BC, the Han then made another offensive led by Wei Qing, who crossed the Yellow River heading west and reached Gaoque Pass in the Yin Mountains, where he killed and captured 2,300 Xiongnu.
  • Page 238: General Wei Qing then pacified the area south of the Yellow River in the Ordos Desert, crossed the Ziling Mountains, and built a bridge over the Wujia River of today's Inner Mongolia (the Wujia once flowed into the Yellow River). Near Wujia River, he defeated the local Xiongnu lord Puni at Fuli (located northwest of today's Wuyuan County of Inner Mongolia), killing his soldiers and taking 3,075 of his scouts as prisoners.
  • Page 238-239: In 126 BC, the Xiongnu retaliated once more by invading Tai Commandery and killing its administrator Gong Yu. The Xiongnu once again invaded Yanmen and took over a thousand hostages. In that same year, the Han Dynasty established the Shuofang Commandery just south of the far western bend of the Yellow River, an area that was recently controlled by the Xiongnu but now was dotted with new Han forts. This outraged the Xiongnu.
  • Page 239: In 125 BC, the Xiongnu invaded Dai, Dingxiang, and Shang commanderies, killing and capturing several thousand. These two empires now supported long-range expeditions of an enormous scale. In the Spring of 123 BC, commander Wei Qing, at the head of an army of one hundred thousand cavalry and six subordinate generals, proceeded hundreds of miles north of Dingxiang to assault the Xiongnu. In 122 BC, the Xiongnu again invaded Shanggu Commandery. In 121 BC, General Huo Qubing set off from Longxi with ten thousand cavalry rode a distance of over a thousand li (if the Han li was 415 meters, then his travel distance was 415 km, or 258 miles), crossed the Yanzhi Mountains in what is now Gansu, and assaulted the Xiongnu.
  • Page 239: In the summer of 121 BC,
    tuqi
    and lesser chieftains.
  • Page 239-240: After these incredibly long-range campaigns which damaged the Xiongnu considerably, now Xiongnu chieftains and aristocrats started to defect to Han, including the Hunye King. The Longxi, Beidi, and Hexi areas suffered less from Xiongnu raids. The Han were also able to populate the area south of the Great Bend of the Yellow River with Chinese settlers from Guandong (which was east of the Hangu Pass in Shanxi).
  • Page 240: In 119 BC, Han General Huo Qubing led another large expedition, reaching the Tianyan Mountains (just southeast of the Khangai Mountains in Mongolia). They attacked the Wise King on the Left, who fled after the Han army killed or captured some 70,000 Xiongnu. After this disastrous defeat, the Xiongnu fled to the northern steppe of Mongolia, as their royal court was no longer safe at its previous location south of the Gobi Desert.
  • Page 240-241: In the aftermath of this campaign, two new commanderies were established on the frontier, Shoufang and Wuyuan, as well as a number of Dependent States (Shuguo) overseen by a Director of Independent States (Dianshuguo) inhabited by non-Chinese nomads who had switched allegiance to Han. These Dependent States would act as buffers between the Han Empire and the regions controlled by hostile Xiongnu and Qiang peoples. Furthermore, the borders were stable and the Han Dynasty no longer paid tribute to the Xiongnu.
SECOND PHASE OF CONQUEST (119–104 BC)
  • Page 241 & 244 (map stretched out on pages 242 and 243): In these years, the Han Dynasty rationalized and centralized its financial administrations to meet the problem of depleted state resources following these monumental campaigns. The state monopolies exacted over salt and iron were part of a large and widespread economic reform effort to build up the strength of the central government and prepare it for war. With the Xiongnu Empire defeated and forced to retreat north, the Han set out to annihilate its political power. After several campaigns, by 110 BC the Han had established a new commandery of Jiuquan (located east of the Shule River in Gansu province) that served the strategic purpose of cutting off the communication route between the Xiongnu and the Qiang tribesmen. The new frontier extended as far as Xianlei (in modern Dacheng County, Xinjiang), which was put under cultivation. The Xiongnu were forced to fully retreat from not only the areas south of the northwestern Great Bend of the Yellow River, but also the entire region south of the Gobi Desert.
  • Page 244: Between 112 and 108 BC, the Han established fourteen new border commanderies on their southern and northern frontiers, showing that they had consolidated the areas they recently conquered. Commercial expeditions and military expeditions were sent into Central Asia. A defensive line of self-supporting garrisons were permanently stationed along the new borders. They not only protected lines of communication, but also turned their areas into small but productive agricultural communities.
THIRD PHASE OF CONQUEST (104–87 BC)

The Western Regions

  • Page 247: Zhang Qian, China's first explorer of the Western Regions, departed in 139 or 138 BC to find allies who would side with Han against the Xiongnu, but instead was captured by the Xiongnu for many years before finally meeting the Yuezhi, who rejected his offer of allegiance against the Xiongnu. Although this mission was a failure, it provided the Chinese with the first detailed information of the Western Regions, the wealth it produced and the means of the hegemonic Xiongnu to control it.
  • Page 248-249: The Han expansion into the Western Regions was not brought about by a desire to expand commercial trade with far-flung people; it was part of a grand Han strategy to undermine the Xiongnu. After military expansion, the Han then sought the obvious benefits of extending commercial relations with the sedentary states of Dayuan (Fergana) and Daxia (Bactria, formerly the Greco-Bactrian Kingdom) during the 1st century BC.
  • Page 249-250: By moving in to subjugate and extract tribute from the oasis city-states of the Hexi Corridor and Tarim Basin, the Han Dynasty cut off a vital supply of provisions to the Xiongnu, namely agricultural foodstuffs and crafts made in these urban centers. That was the impetus for Han expansion into the Western Regions, as well as southern Manchuria. After the Han discontinued its trade, shut down its border markets, and forced the Xiongnu to flee the areas south of the Gobi Desert, the Xiongnu had to rely more and more on the products made by the oasis city-states (located now in Xinjiang). As for the new settlements established by the Chinese on their new frontiers, QUOTE: "These military-agricultural settlements had multiple functions: to prevent the Hsiung-nu from gaining access to agricultural products, to serve as advanced logistic support for Chinese expeditionary armies, and to protect the trade that China was starting to organize with the west."
  • Page 250-251: As proven by Chinese records and archaeological excavations, the Xiongnu did have a few agricultural settlements of their own where they put nomads to work farming, but these were marginal compared to the amount of agricultural products that could be gained from the western city-states as soon as the heqin relations broke down.