Zachlumia

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Principality of Zachlumia
Захумље
Zahumlje
9th century–1054
Ljutovid
(last independent)
History 
• Established
9th century
• Conquered by Duklja
1054
Preceded by		 Succeeded by
Principality of Serbia
Byzantine Empire
Duklja
Today part ofCroatia
Bosnia and Herzegovina

Zachlumia or Zachumlia (

Kingdom of Croatia, Principality of Serbia) and later was subjected (temporarily or for a longer period) to Kingdom of Hungary, Kingdom of Serbia, Kingdom of Bosnia, and at the end to the Ottoman Empire
.

Etymology

Zachlumia is a derivative of Hum, from Proto-Slavic

Bona, at the mouth of the Buna.[citation needed] The principality is named Zahumlje or Hum in Serbo-Croatian (Serbian Cyrillic: Захумље, Хум). It is Zachlumia in Latin, Хлъмъ in Old Church Slavonic
, and Ζαχλούμων χώρα ("land of Zachlumians") in Greek. The names Chelmania, Chulmia and terra de Chelmo appear in later Latin and Italian chronicles.

Geography

De Administrando Imperio described the polity of Zachlumia as: "From Ragusa begins the domain of the Zachlumi (Ζαχλοῦμοι) and stretches along as far as the river Orontius: and on the side of the coast it is neighbour to the Pagani, but on the side of the mountain country it is neighbour to the Croats on the north and to Serbia at the front ... Those who live there now, Zachlumi, are Serbs, from the time of that prince who claimed the protection of the Emperor Heraclius. In the territory of the Zachlumi are the inhabited cities of Stagnon, Mokriskik, Iosli, Galoumainik, Dobriskik".[2]

The

Dabar, Žapska, Gorička and Večenik around Neretva. Zahumlje had access to the Adriatic Sea with the Pelješac peninsula and faced Serbia northwards.[citation needed
]

Slavic settlement

Slavs invaded Balkans during

Thessalonica. The Western Balkans was settled with Sclaveni (Sklavenoi), the east with Antes.[3] The Sklavenoi plundered Thrace in 545, and again the next year. In 551, the Slavs crossed Niš initially headed for Thessalonica, but ended up in Dalmatia.[4] In 577 some 100,000 Slavs poured into Thrace and Illyricum, pillaging cities and settling down.[5] Hum had also a large number of Vlachs who were descendent from a pre-Slavic population. Related to Romanians and originally speaking a language related to Romanian, the Vlachs of what was Hum are today Slavic speaking.[6]

History

Part of a series on the
History of Herzegovina
flag Bosnia and Herzegovina portal

7th century

See also:
Migration period

In the second decade of the 7th century, the

Byzantine province of Dalmatia, including the territory of what would become Zahumlje, sacking towns and enslaving or displacing the local population. Some of the Slavs and Avars might have permanently settled in the occupied areas. They attacked Constantinople in 626 but were defeated by the Byzantines, after which the Avars ceased to play a significant role in the Balkans.[7]

Around 630, during the reign of

White Serbs,[16] and it's unclear whether the Zachlumians "in the migration period to the Balkans really were Serbs or Croats or Slavic tribes which in alliance with Serbs or Croats arrived in the Balkans".[17] According to Francis Dvornik the Zachlumians "had a closer bond of interest with the Croats than with the Serbs, since they seem to have migrated to their new home not with the Serbs, but with the Croats".[18] Michael's tribal origin is related to the oral tradition from Historia Salonitana by Thomas the Archdeacon about seven or eight tribes of nobles called Lingones who arrived from Poland and settled in Croatia.[19][20][21][22] Much of Dalmatia was sometime earlier settled by the Croats, and Zahumlje bordered their territory on the north.[23] According to Thomas the Archdeacon, when describing the reign of Croatian king Stephen Držislav
in the late 10th century, notes that Duchy of Hum (Zachlumia or Chulmie) was a part of the Kingdom of Croatia, before and after Stjepan Držislav:

"Istaque fuerunt regni eorum confinia: ab oriente Delmina, ubi fuit civitas Delmis, ... ab occidente Carinthia, versus mare usque ad oppidum Stridonis, quod nunc est confinium Dalmatie et Ystrie; ab aquilone vero a ripa Danubii usque ad mare Dalmaticum cum tota Maronia et Chulmie ducatu."

"The boundaries of that kingdom were as follows. To the east: Delmina. ... To the west: Carinthia, towards the sea up to the town of Stridon, which now marks the boundary between Dalmatia and Istria. To the north, moreover: from the banks of the Danube down to the Dalmatian sea, including all of Maronia and the Duchy of Hum."

— Thomas the Archdeacon.[24]

9th century

See also:
Byzantine–Arab Wars (780–1180)
Slavic principalities in ca. 814 AD.
Slavic principalities in ca. 850 AD.

Dalmatian Croatia and Zahumlje) in the period from the 820s through 840s.[27]

In 866, a major

Dyrrachium) did not stretch into the hinterlands, and had none military capacity, thus Basil I paid a tax of '72 gold coins' to the princes of Zahumlje and Travunia.[29]

In 879, the Pope asked for help from duke Zdeslav Trpimirović for an armed escort for his delegates across southern Dalmatia and Zahumlje. Later in 880, the Pope ask the same from Zdeslav's successor, prince Branimir.[citation needed]

10th century

See also: Michael of Zahumlje
Kingdom of Croatia and the Bulgarian Empire
.

The history of Zahumlje as a greater political entity starts with the emerging of

Croatian Kingdom and Principality of Serbia as well as an ally of Bulgaria, he was nevertheless able to maintain independent rule throughout at least a good part of his reign.[10]

Michael have come into territorial conflict with the neighbouring prince

Peter Gojniković, the ruler of inner Serbia, who was extending his power westwards.[30][31] To eliminate that threat and as a close ally of Bulgaria, Michael warned the Bulgarian Tsar Simeon I about the alliance between Peter and Symeon's enemy, the Byzantine Empire.[30] In 912 Michael kidnapped the Venetian Doge's son Peter Badoari that was returning to Venice from Constantinople and sent him to Czar Simeon as a sign of loyalty. Symeon attacked inner Serbia and captured Peter, who later died in prison, and Michael was able to restore the majority of control.[32]

The Historia Salonitana maior, whose composition may have begun in the late 13th century,[33] cites a letter of Pope John X to Tomislav, "king (rex) of the Croats", in which he refers to the first council in some detail. If the letter is authentic, it shows that the council was attended not only by the bishops of Croatian and Byzantine Dalmatia, but also by Tomislav, whose territory also included the Byzantine cities of Dalmatia, and by a number of Michael's representatives. Zahumlje may have been under Croatian influence, but remained a separate political entity. Both Zahumlje and Croatia were under the religious jurisdiction of the Archbishopric of Split. In this letter, John describes Michael as "the most excellent leader of the Zachlumi" (excellentissimus dux Chulmorum),[34][35] and is mentioned the Ston bishopric (ecclesia Stagnensis) which jurisdiction remained under Split until 1022.[36] It is uncertain whether the inscription and depiction of a Slavic ruler in the Church of St. Michael in Ston is a reference to Michael of Zahumlje, the 12th century Mihailo I of Duklja or St. Michael himself.[37]

After the Italian city of

patrikios).[32] He remained as ruler of Zahumlje into the 940s, while maintaining good relations with the Papacy.[39]

Post-Michael of Zahumlje period

After the death of Michael (after c. 930s or 940s), the fate of Zahumlje is uncertain due to lack of historical sources about it.

Stephen Držislav (969–997), but that's also disputable.[40]

In the late 990s, Bulgarian Tsar Samuel made client states out of most of the Balkans, including Duklja and Zahumlje.

Split, Trogir and Zadar, then northeast through Bosnia and Raška and returned to Bulgaria.[43][42]

11th century

By 1020, Byzantine Emperor Basil I expanded control in the whole region, but the Byzantines used local elite to rule over local polities although under Byzantine vassalage and supervision of Byzantine officials.[44] In the Pope Benedict VIII's bull from 27 September 1022 is mentioned Zahumlje kingdom (regno Lachomis), and would be again in the bull of Pope Gregory VII from 1076 (as regno Zaculmi), which confirmed the jurisdiction of the archdiocese of Dubrovnik.[44]

In a charter dated July 1039, Ljutovid of Zahumlje who was an independent Slavic ruler of Zahumlje, styled himself "Ljutovit, protospatharios epi tou Chrysotriklinou, hypatos, strategos" of Serbia and Zahumlje. According to historian Paul Stephenson, it "suggests that he had been courted by the emperor, and awarded nominal rights neighbouring lands, including Duklja, which was at the time at war with the empire.[45]

According to historical sources, the Serbian lands were under Byzantine control or vassalage until 1040s, but not under a direct control.

Vojislavljević to head the local structure as Prince or Duke.[47] Zahumlje subsequently became part of the Grand Principality of Serbia
.

12th century

Zahumlje in 1190 as a lower part of Kingdom of Hungary

Uroš II Prvoslav ruled Serbia together 1149–1153; Desa had the title of 'Prince of Duklja, Travunija and Zahumlje', mentioned in 1150 and 1151.[citation needed
]

About 1150, the Byzantine Emperor Manuel I Komnenos displeased with king Radoslav of Duklja, divided up his lands between princes of the old Serbian family of Zavida, and Stefan Nemanja secured the land of Hum.[50] After 1168 when Nemanja was raised to the Serbian throne with Manuel's favor, Hum passed to his brother Miroslav.[50] He married a sister of Ban Kulin, who in meantime acquired the throne of Bosnia.[50] The subjects of Miroslav and Kulin included both Catholic and Orthodox.[50] Prince Miroslav himself was Orthodox.[51] In meantime, both Bosnia and Hum had been fought between Kingdom of Hungary and Byzantine Empire.[50] The Catholics supported the former and the Orthodox the latter.[50] A support of the growing heresy seemed the best solution for both Kulin and Miroslav.[50]

Miroslav Gospel, one of the oldest surviving documents written in Serbian recension of Old Church Slavonic, was created by order by prince Miroslav of Hum

Following the death of Emperor Manuel in 1180 Miroslav started ecclesiastical superior of Hum.

Lim region with Bijelo Polje.[53] Rastko however took monastic vows and Miroslav continued ruling Hum after 1192.[53]

Latin vengeance came in March 1198, when

Miroslav Gospels are the oldest surviving documents written in Serbian recension of Old Church Slavonic, very likely produced for the Church of St Peter in Lima, commissioned by prince Miroslav.[54]

13th century

Medieval Serbian Kingdom
in 1265

Until beginning of the 13th century, areas of Zahumlje were under jurisdiction of the Roman Church.

archbishop of Serbia in 1219, he appointed Ilarion as the Orthodox bishop of Hum
.

Stephen Uroš I of Serbia, at the same time swearing allegiance to Béla IV of Hungary. Following an earthquake in the Hum capital of Ston, the Serbian Orthodox bishop of Hum moved to the church of St Peter and St Paul built on the Lim River near the Serbian border in the 1250s.[56]

Stephen Uroš I of Serbia tried to stamp out regional differences by dropping references to Zahumlje (Hum), Trebinje and Duklja (Zeta), and called himself "King of all Serbian land and the Coast".[59] Miroslav's descendants dropped to the level of other local nobles.[59]

14th century

Further information: Kingdom of Bosnia

Šubić family.[29] In the war that followed Milutin took one of Mladen's brother captive, and to get him back Mladen Šubić had to agree to restore a part of Hum to Milutin.[29] After this agreement in 1313 the Neretva again became the border between eastern and western Hum.[29]

By 1325, the

Stephen Uroš IV Dušan sold Ston and Pelješac to Dubrovnik, and turned to the east to acquire all of Macedonia.[64]

The region was overwhelmed by the

House of Kotromanić from Bosnia in 1322–1326. By the mid-14th century, Bosnia apparently reached a peak under Ban Tvrtko I who came into power in 1353.[citation needed
]

15th century

Sandalj Hranić
around 1412 – the principality toward its end

In the beginning of the 15th century,

Sandalj Hranić Kosača ruled over its eastern part, while the Neretva river remain a border between their possessions.[65]

The territory on the right bank of the Lower Neretva was at the time controlled by Kosača vassals, a local clan and magnates of

Radivojević–Jurjević–Vlatković.[66]

Bosnian regional lord Stjepan Vukčić Kosača ruled over Zahumlje, or Humska zemlja as it was called at this point. In 1448 he assumed the title herzog and styled himself Herzog of Hum and the Coast, Grand Duke of Bosnia, Knyaz of Drina, and the rest,[67][68] and since 1450, Herzog of Saint Sava, Lord of Hum, Grand Duke of Bosnia, Knyaz of Drina, and the rest.[69] This "Saint Sava" part of the title had considerable public relations value, because Sava's relics were consider miracle-working by people of all Christian faiths.[69] Stjepan's title will prompt the Ottomans to start calling Humska zemlja by using using the possessive form of the noun Herceg, Herceg's land(s) (Herzegovina), which remains a long-lasting legacy in the name of Bosnia and Herzegovina to this day.[70][67][71]

In 1451 he attacked Dubrovnik, and laid siege to the city.[72] He had earlier been made a Ragusan nobleman and, consequently, the Ragusan government now proclaimed him a traitor.[72] A reward of 15,000 ducats, a palace in Dubrovnik worth 2,000 ducats, and an annual income of 300 ducats was offered to anyone who would kill him, along with the promise of hereditary Ragusan nobility which also helped hold this promise to whoever did the deed.[72] Stjepan was so scared by the threat that he finally raised the siege.[72]

Demographics

12th–13th centuries

Most of Hum's territory was inhabited by

Catholics and Orthodox.[51][74]

14th–15th centuries

In contrast to Bosnia, where Roman Catholicism and

Dabar, to Kotor. The people from Hum were mostly girls from Gacko, who took up working as servants to wealthy families.[76]

List of rulers

Part of a series on the
History of
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Sclavonia Croatia Bosnia cum Dalmatiæ parte
Early history
Middle Ages
  • Bosnia in the Early Middle Ages
    (before 10th c.)
  • Zachumlia
    (~9th–14th c.)
  • Podrinje
    )
  • Bosansko Krajište (1451-1463)
  • Duchy of Herzegovina
    (1463–1482)
Ottoman era
  • Ottoman conquest
  • (Bosansko Krajište (1451-1463))
  • Herzegovina Uprising
    (1875–1877))
Habsburg era
  • Bosnian crisis
    )
Yugoslavia
Contemporary
Republika Srpska)
flag Bosnia and Herzegovina portal
Part of a series on the
History of Croatia
ILIYRICVM HODIERNVM, Quod Scriptores communiter SCLAVONIAM, Itali SCHIAVONIAM nuncupare solent, in Dalmatiam, Croatiam, Bosnam, et Slavoniam, from Atlas Van der Hagen
Early history
Middle Ages
Modernity
20th century
Contemporary Croatia
Timeline
flag Croatia portal
Part of a series on the
History of Serbia
Map of Balkans, Byzantine Empire and Anatolia, 1355. -- Velhagen & Klasing atlas of history, Berlin 1931 (english version)
By century
Prehistory
Pre-Roman
Early Roman
Late Roman
Early Middle Ages
White Serbia around 600 AD
Principality of Serbia
Bosnia
 7th–10th century
Catepanate of Ras around 969–976
Grand Principality
 1071–1217
Kingdom of Serbia 1217–1346
King Dragutin's realm 1282–1325
 1346–1371
Lordship of Prilep 1371–1395
Prince Lazar's Serbia 1371–1402
Vuk's Land 1371–1412
Despotate of Serbia 1402–1537
Koča's frontier
 1788–1791
Serbia 1804–1918
Serbian Revolution 1804–1815
Principality of Serbia 1815–1882
Serbian Vojvodina 1848–1849
Serbia and Banat 1849–1860
Kingdom of Serbia 1882–1918
Serbia since 1918
Kingdom of Yugoslavia 1918–1941
Axis occupation 1941–1944
Federal unit of Socialist Yugoslavia 1944–1992
Constituent state with Montenegro 1992–2006
Republic of Serbia 2006–present
flag Serbia portal

Legacy

The historical name of the region is officially represented in the name of the

Petrović-Njegoš dynasty that ruled in Montenegro until 1918. The last grand duke of Zahumlije was Prince Peter of Montenegro, who died in 1932.[80]

See also

References

Footnotes

  1. ^ Entry "холм" in М. Фасмер (1986), Этимологический Словарь Русского Языка (Москва: Прогресс), 2-е изд. — Перевод с немецкого и дополнения О.Н. Трубачёва.
  2. ^ Moravcsik 1967, p. 145, 161, 163.
  3. ^ Hupchick 2002.
  4. ^ Janković 2004, p. 39-61.
  5. ^ J B Bury, History of the Later Roman Empire from Arcadius to Irene, Vol 2 L
  6. ^ Fine 1994, p. 19.
  7. ^ Fine 1991, p. 25.
  8. ^ Ćirković 2004, p. 12.
  9. ^ Dvornik et al. 1962, pp. 139, 142: He probably saw that in his time all these tribes were in the Serb sphere of influence, and therefore called them Serbs, thus ante-dating by three centuries the state of affairs in his day... It is obvious that the small retinue of the Serbian prince could not have populated Serbia, Zachlumia, Terbounia and Narenta.
  10. ^ a b Curta 2006, p. 210: According to Constantine Porphyrogenitus, the Slavs of the Dalmatian zhupanias of Pagania, Zahumlje, Travounia, and Konavli all "descended from the unbaptized Serbs."51 This has been rightly interpreted as an indication that in the mid-tenth century the coastal zhupanias were under the control of the Serbian zhupan Časlav, who ruled over the regions in the interior and extended his power westwards across the mountains to the coast.
  11. ^ Živković 2006, p. 60–61:Data on the family origin of Mihailo Višević indicate that his family did not belong to a Serbian or Croatian tribe, but to another Slavic tribe who lived along the Vistula River and who joined the Serbs during the migration during the reign of Emperor Heraclius. The introduction of Mihajlo Višević and his family by Porphyrogenitus suggests that the rulers of Zahumlje until his time belonged to this ruling family, so that, both in Serbia and Croatia, and in Zahumlje, there would be a very early established principle of inheriting power by members of one family. Constantine Porphyrogenitus explicitly calls the inhabitants of Zahumlje Serbs who have settled there since the time of Emperor Heraclius, but we cannot be certain that the Travunians, Zachlumians and Narentines in the migration period to the Balkans were Serbs or Croats or Slavic tribes which in alliance with Serbs or Croats arrived in the Balkans. The emperor-writer says that all these principalities are inhabited by Serbs, but this is a view from his time when the process of ethnogenesis had already reached such a stage that the Serbian name became widespread and generally accepted throughout the land due to Serbia's political domination. Therefore, it could be concluded that in the middle of the 10th century the process of ethnogenesis in Zahumlje, Travunija, and Paganija was probably completed, because the emperor's informant collected data from his surroundings and transferred to Constantinople the tribal sense of belonging of the inhabitants of these archons ... The Byzantine writings on the De Ceremoniis, which were also written under the patronage of Constantine Porphyrogenitus, listed the imperial orders to the surrounding peoples. The writings cite orders from the archons of Croats, Serbs, Zahumljani, Kanalites, Travunians, Duklja and Moravia. The above-mentioned orders may have originated at the earliest during the reign of Emperor Theophilus (829 - 842) and represent the earliest evidence of the political fragmentation of the South Slavic principalities, that is, they confirm their very early formation. It is not known when Zahumlje was formed as a separate principality. All the news that Constantine Porphyrogenitus provides about this area agrees that it has always been so - that is, since the seventh-century settlement in the time of Emperor Heraclius. It is most probable that the prefects in the coastal principalities recognized the supreme authority of the Serbian ruler from the very beginning, but that they aspired to become independent, which took place according to the list of orders preserved in the book De Ceremoniis, no later than the first half of the 9th century. A falsified and highly controversial papal charter from 743 also mentions Zahumlje and Travunija as separate areas. If the basic information about these countries were correct, it would mean that they formed as very early principalities that were practically independent of the archon of Serbia.
  12. ISBN 953-169-032-4. Archived from the original
    (PDF) on 2019-05-04. Retrieved 2019-05-04. Pri tome je car dosljedno izostavljao Dukljane iz ove srpske zajednice naroda. Čini se, međutim, očitim da car ne želi govoriti ο stvarnoj etničkoj povezanosti, već da su mu pred očima politički odnosi u trenutku kada je pisao djelo, odnosno iz vremena kada su za nj prikupljani podaci u Dalmaciji.
  13. ^ Gračanin, Hrvoje (2008), "Od Hrvata pak koji su stigli u Dalmaciju odvojio se jedan dio i zavladao Ilirikom i Panonijom: Razmatranja uz DAI c. 30, 75-78", Povijest U Nastavi (in Croatian), VI (11): 67–76, Izneseni nalazi navode na zaključak da se Hrvati nisu uopće naselili u južnoj Panoniji tijekom izvorne seobe sa sjevera na jug, iako je moguće da su pojedine manje skupine zaostale na tom području utopivši se naposljetku u premoćnoj množini ostalih doseljenih slavenskih populacija. Širenje starohrvatskih populacija s juga na sjever pripada vremenu od 10. stoljeća nadalje i povezano je s izmijenjenim političkim prilikama, jačanjem i širenjem rane hrvatske države. Na temelju svega ovoga mnogo je vjerojatnije da etnonim "Hrvati" i doseoba skrivaju činjenicu o prijenosu političke vlasti, što znači da je car političko vrhovništvo poistovjetio s etničkom nazočnošću. Točno takav pristup je primijenio pretvarajući Zahumljane, Travunjane i Neretljane u Srbe (DAI, c. 33, 8-9, 34, 4-7, 36, 5-7).
  14. ISBN 978-953-340-061-7, archived from the original
    on 2022-10-03, retrieved 2020-12-27, Sporovi hrvatske i srpske historiografije oko etničkoga karaktera sklavinija između Cetine i Drača bespredmetni su, jer transponiraju suvremene kategorije etniciteta u rani srednji vijek u kojem se identitet shvaćao drukčije. Osim toga, opstojnost većine sklavinija, a pogotovo Duklje (Zete) govori i u prilog ustrajanju na vlastitom identitetu kojim su se njihove elite razlikovale od onih susjednih ... Međutim, nakon nekog vremena (možda poslije unutarnjih sukoba u Hrvatskoj) promijenio je svoj položaj i prihvatio vrhovništvo srpskog vladara jer Konstantin tvrdi da su Zahumljani (kao i Neretvani i Travunjani) bili Srbi od vremena onog arhonta koji je Srbe, za vrijeme Heraklija, doveo u njihovu novu domovinu. Ta tvrdnja, naravno, nema veze sa stvarnošću 7. st., ali govori o političkim odnosima u Konstantinovo vrijeme.
  15. ^ Malcolm 1995, p. 10-11.
  16. ^ Živković, Tibor (2001). "О северним границама Србије у раном средњем веку" [On the northern borders of Serbia in the early middle ages]. Zbornik Matice srpske za istoriju (in Serbian). 63/64: 11. Plemena u Zahumlju, Paganiji, Travuniji i Konavlima Porfirogenit naziva Srbima,28 razdvajajuči pritom njihovo političko od etničkog bića.29 Ovakvo tumačenje verovatno nije najsrećnije jer za Mihaila Viševića, kneza Zahumljana, kaže da je poreklom sa Visle od roda Licika,30 a ta je reka isuviše daleko od oblasti Belih Srba i gde bi pre trebalo očekivati Bele Hrvate. To je prva indicija koja ukazuje da je srpsko pleme možda bilo na čelu većeg saveza slovenskih plemena koja su sa njim i pod vrhovnim vodstvom srpskog arhonta došla na Balkansko poluostrvo.
  17. ^ Živković 2006, p. 60.
  18. ^ Dvornik et al. 1962, p. 139: Even if we reject Gruber's theory, supported by Manojlović (ibid., XLIX), that Zachlumje actually became a part of Croatia, it should be emphasized that the Zachlumians had a closer bond of interest with the Croats than with the Serbs, since they seem to have migrated to their new home not, as C. says (33/8-9), with the Serbs, but with the Croats; see below, on 33/18-19 ... If this is so, we must regard the dynasty of Zachlumje and at any rate part of its people as neither Croat nor Serb, It seems more probable that Michael’s ancestor, together with his tribe, joined the Croats when they moved south; and settled on the Adriatic coast and the Narenta, leaving the Croats to push on into Dalmatia proper.
  19. ^ Dvornik et al. 1962, p. 139.
  20. ^ Uzelac, Aleksandar (2018). "Prince Michael of Zahumlje – a Serbian ally of Tsar Simeon". In Angel Nikolov; Nikolay Kanev (eds.). Emperor Symeon's Bulgaria in the History of Europe's South-East: 1100 years from the Battle of Achelous. Sofia: Univerzitetsvo izdatelstvo "Sveti Kliment Ohridski". p. 237. ...the enigmatic Litziki were associated with the archaic names of Poles(Lendizi, Liakhy),7 or with the Slavic tribe of Lingones mentioned by chronicler Adam of Bremen.8 Be that as it may, it is certain that, although his subjects were perceived as Serbs, the family of Prince Michael of Zahumlje did not descend from Serbs or Croats, and was not related to their dynasties.
  21. ^ Živković 2006, p. 75.
  22. ^ Lončar, Milenko; Jurić, Teuta Serreqi (2018). "Tamno more u spisu De administrando imperio: Baltičko ili Crno?" [The Dark Sea in De administrando imperio: The Baltic or the Black Sea?]. Povijesni prilozi (in Croatian). 37 (54): 14. Kao potporna analogija može poslužiti i podrijetlo Mihaela Viševića, vladara Zahumljana s područja Visle.21 Teško da je netko drugi (osim njega samoga i njegova roda) iznosio takvu obavijest. Ista hrvatska tradicija, ponešto izmijenjena, zadržala se u Dalmaciji sve do 13. stoljeća kada ju spominje Toma Arhiđakon: "Iz krajeva Poljske došlo je s Totilom sedam ili osam uglednih plemena, koji se zovu Lingoni."2
  23. ^ Fine 1991, p. 32-33.
  24. ^ a b Thomas of Split 2006, p. 60–61.
  25. ^ a b Ross 1945, p. 212–235.
  26. ^ a b Fine 1991, p. 253.
  27. ^ a b c d e f g h i Fine 1991, p. 257.
  28. ^ Norris 1993, p. 24.
  29. ^ a b c d e f g Fine 1991, p. 258.
  30. ^ a b Fine 1991, p. 149.
  31. ^ Ćirković 2004, p. 18.
  32. ^ a b Moravcsik 1967, p. 152-162.
  33. ^ Fine 2005, pp. 54–55: "John the Deacon [...] makes no mention of either council", "manuscript from the 16th century Historia Salonitana maior has long descriptions of the two councils" and "the labels of identity [...] represent views from no earlier than the late 13th century, and possibly the 14th, 15th and 16th"
  34. ^ Vlasto 1970, p. 209.
  35. ^ Ćirković 2004, p. 17.
  36. ^ Dzino 2023, p. 168.
  37. ^ Dzino 2023, p. 168–169.
  38. ^ Omrčanin 1984, p. 24.
  39. ^ a b Fine 1991, p. 160.
  40. ^ a b c Dzino 2023, p. 169.
  41. ^ Fine 1991, p. 274.
  42. ^ a b Dzino 2023, p. 170.
  43. ^ a b Шишић 1928, p. 331.
  44. ^ a b Dzino 2023, p. 172.
  45. ^ a b Stephenson 2003, p. 42-43.
  46. ^ Zlatar 2007, p. 572.
  47. ^ Fine 1991, p. 223.
  48. ^ Fine 1991, p. 231.
  49. ^ Fine 1994, p. 3.
  50. ^ a b c d e f g Runciman 1982, p. 101.
  51. ^ a b Fine 1975, p. 114.
  52. ^ a b c d e f g h Runciman 1982, p. 102.
  53. ^ a b Fine 1994, p. 20-21.
  54. ^ Ćirković 2004, p. 19.
  55. doi:10.47960/2712-1844.2016.2.65
    . Do početka 20-ih godina 13. stoljeća prostori Humske zemlje bili su pod jurisdikcijom zapadne, odnosno rimske Crkve.
  56. ^ a b Fine 1994, p. 52-54.
  57. ^ Ćirković 2004, p. 37.
  58. ^ Runciman 1982, p. 107.
  59. ^ a b c Fine 1994, p. 203.
  60. ^ Fine 1994, p. 207-208.
  61. ^ a b Fine 1994, p. 209-210.
  62. ^ Karbić 2004, p. 17.
  63. ^ a b c d Fine 1994, p. 266.
  64. ^ a b Fine 1994, p. 267.
  65. ^ Zlatar 2007, p. 555.
  66. ISSN 1330-0474
    . Retrieved 2012-07-09.
  67. ^ a b Vego 1982, p. 48.
  68. ^ Ćirković 1964a, p. 106.
  69. ^ a b Fine 1994, p. 578.
  70. ^ Vego 1982, p. 48: "Tako se pojam Humska zemlja postepeno gubi da ustupi mjesto novom imenu zemlje hercega Stjepana — Hercegovini."
  71. ^ Ćirković 1964a, p. 272.
  72. ^ a b c d Viator (1978), pp. 388–389.
  73. ISBN 978-0-472-02560-2
    . Retrieved 21 July 2021.
  74. ^ a b Fine 1994, p. 20.
  75. ^ Velikonja 2003, p. 38.
  76. ^ Тошић 2005, p. 221-227.
  77. ^ a b "Ranokršćanske i predromaničke crkve u Stonu" [Early Christian and pre-romanesque churches in Ston] (PDF). Građevinar (in Serbo-Croatian). 58. Zagreb: Croatian Society of Civil Engineers: 757–766. 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-21. Retrieved 2011-02-18.
  78. ^ Fine 1994, p. 258.
  79. ^ a b Runciman 1982, p. 111.
  80. ^ Ulla Tillander-Godenhielm (2005): The Russian Imperial Award System During the Reign of Nicolas II, p. 446.

Bibliography

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Zahumlje.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zachlumia&oldid=1220983188"