Background of the Spanish Civil War
The background of the Spanish Civil War dates back to the end of the 19th century, when the owners of large estates, called
The revolutionary committee headed by
Events in the period following November 1933, called the "black biennium", seemed to make a civil war more likely.
Constitutional monarchy
19th century
The
In 1868,
The most traditionalist sectors of the
Periodically, anarchism became popular among the working class, and was far stronger in Spain than anywhere else in Europe at the time.[5] Anarchists were easily defeated in clashes with government forces.[13]
20th century
In 1897, an Italian anarchist assassinated Prime Minister
Spain's
In 1912 the
The military was keen to avoid the break-up of the state and was increasingly inward-looking following the loss of Cuba. Regional
Increasing exports during the
Second Republic
The Second Republic was a source of hope to the poorest in Spanish society and a threat to the richest, but had broad support from all segments of society.[37] Niceto Alcalá-Zamora was the first prime minister of the Republic.[38] The wealthier landowners and the middle class accepted the Republic because of the lack of any suitable alternative.[37] Elections to a constituent Cortes in June 1931 returned a large majority of Republicans and Socialists, with the PSOE gaining 116 seats and Lerroux's Radical Party 94.[39] Lerroux became foreign minister.[40] The government was controlled by a Republican–Socialist coalition, whose members had differing objectives. Some more conservative members believed that the removal of the monarchy was enough by itself, but the Socialists and leftist Republicans demanded much wider reforms.[37]
The state's financial position was poor. Supporters of the dictatorship attempted to block progress on reforming the economy.
Effective opposition was led by three groups. The first group included Catholic movements such as the
On 11 May 1931 rumours that a taxi driver was supposedly killed by monarchists sparked a wave of anti-clerical violence throughout south west urban Spain beginning. An angry crowd assaulted and burned ABC newspaper. The government's reluctance to declare martial law in response and a comment attributed to Azaña that he would "rather all the churches in Spain be burnt than a single Republican harmed" prompted many Catholics to believe that the Republic was trying to prosecute Christianity.[51] Next day the Jesuit Church in the Calle de La Flor was also burned. Several other churches and convents were burned throughout the day. Over the next days some hundred churches were burned all over Spain. The government blamed the monarchists for sparking the riots and closed the ABC newspaper and El Debate.[52]
Parties in opposition to Alcalá-Zamora's provisional government gained the support of the church and the military.
Constitution of 1931
In October 1931 The conservative Catholic Republican prime-minister Alcalá-Zamora and the Interior Minister Miguel Maura resigned from the provisional government when the controversial articles 26 and 27 of the constitution, which strictly controlled Church property and prohibited religious orders from engaging in education were passed. During the debate held on 13 October, a night that Alcalá-Zamora considered the saddest night of his life, Azaña declared that Spain had "ceased to be Catholic"; although to an extent his statement was accurate,[nb 3] it was a politically unwise thing to say.[56] Manuel Azaña became the new provisional Prime Minister. Desiring the job for himself, Lerroux became alienated, and his Radical Party switched to the opposition,[57] leaving Azaña dependent on the Socialists for support. The Socialists, who favoured reform, objected to the lack of progress. The reforms that were made alienated the land-holding right.[58] Conditions for labourers remained dreadful; the reforms had not been enforced.[59] Rural landowners declared war on the government by refusing to plant crops.[60] Meanwhile, several agricultural strikes were harshly put down by the authorities.[59] Reforms, including the unsuccessful attempt to break up large holdings, failed to significantly improve the situation for rural workers.[60] By the end of 1931, King Alfonso, in exile, stopped attempting to prevent an armed insurrection of monarchists in Spain, and was tried and condemned to life imprisonment in absentia.[61]
A new constitution was approved on 9 December 1931.[62] The first draft, prepared by Ángel Ossorio y Gallardo and others, was rejected, and a much more daring text creating a "democratic republic of workers of every class" was promulgated.[63] It contained much in the way of emotive language and included many controversial articles, some of which were aimed at curbing the Catholic Church.[64][65] The constitution was reformist, liberal, and democratic in nature, and was welcomed by the Republican–Socialist coalition. It appalled landowners, industrialists, the organised church, and army officers.[62] At this point once the constituent assembly had fulfilled its mandate of approving a new constitution, it should have arranged for regular parliamentary elections and adjourned.[66] However fearing the increasing popular opposition the Radical and Socialist majority postponed the regular elections, therefore prolonging their way in power for two more years. This way the provisional republican government of Manuel Azaña initiated numerous reforms to what in their view would "modernize" the country.[66]
As the provisional government believed it was necessary to break the control the church had over Spanish affairs, the new constitution removed any special rights held by the Catholic Church.
Restrictions on Christian iconography in schools and hospitals and the ringing of bells came into force in January 1932. State control of cemeteries was also imposed. Many ordinary Catholics began to see the government as an enemy because of the educational and religious reforms.[57][72] Government actions were denounced as barbaric, unjust, and corrupt by the press.[73]
In August 1932 there was an unsuccessful uprising by General José Sanjurjo, who had been particularly appalled by events in Castilblanco.[74] The aims of the insurrection were vague,[74] and it quickly turned into a fiasco.[75][51] Among the generals tried and sent to Spanish colonies were four men who would go on to distinguish themselves fighting against the Republic in the civil war: Francisco de Borbón y de la Torre, Duke of Seville, Martin Alonso,[nb 4] Ricardo Serrador Santés, and Heli Rolando de Tella y Cantos.[75]
Azaña's government continued to ostracized the church. The Jesuits who were in charge of the best schools throughout the country were banned and had all their property confiscated. The army was reduced. Landowners were expropriated. Home rule was granted to Catalonia, with a local parliament and a president of its own.[66] In November 1932, Miguel de Unamuno, one of the most respected Spanish intellectuals, rector of the University of Salamanca, and himself a Republican, publicly raised his voice to protest. In a speech delivered on 27 November 1932, at the Madrid Ateneo, he protested: "Even the Inquisition was limited by certain legal guarantees. But now we have something worse: a police force which is grounded only on a general sense of panic and on the invention of non-existent dangers to cover up this over-stepping of the law."[76] In June 1933 Pope Pius XI issued the encyclical Dilectissima Nobis, "On Oppression of the Church of Spain", raising his voice against the persecution of the Catholic Church in Spain.[76]
The political left became fractured, whilst the right united.
The "black biennium"
Following the elections of November 1933, Spain entered a period called the "black biennium" (Spanish: bienio negro)[81] by the left. The CEDA had won a plurality of seats, but not enough to form a majority. President Niceto Alcalá-Zamora declined to invite the leader of the most voted party, Gil Robles, to form a government, and instead invited the Radical Republican Party's Alejandro Lerroux to do so.[82] Immediately after the election, the Socialists alleged electoral fraud; they had, according to the PSOE, needed twice as many votes as their opponents to win each seat. They identified the lack of unity in the left as another reason for their defeat.[83] The Socialist opposition began to propagate a revolutionary ideal.[82] Stanley Payne asserts that the left demanded the cancellation of the elections not because the elections were fraudulent but because in its view those that had won the elections did not share the republican ideals.[84]
The government, with the backing of CEDA, set about removing price controls, selling state favours and monopolies, and removing the land reforms—to the landowners' considerable advantage. This created growing malnourishment in the south of Spain.[85] The agrarian reforms, still in force, went tacitly unenforced.[86] Radicals became more aggressive and conservatives turned to paramilitary and vigilante actions.
The first working class protest came from the anarchists on 8 December 1933, and was easily crushed by force in most of Spain; Zaragoza held out for four days before the
Lerroux resigned in April 1934, after President Zamora hesitated to sign an Amnesty Bill which let off the arrested members of the 1932 plot. He was replaced by
On 26 September, the CEDA announced it would no longer support the RRP's minority government. It was replaced by an RRP cabinet, again led by Lerroux, that included three members of the CEDA.
The 1934 strike was unsuccessful in most of Spain.[103] However, in Asturias in northern Spain, it developed into a bloody revolutionary uprising, trying to overthrow the legitimate democratic regime. Around 30,000 workers were called to arms in ten days.[104] Armed with dynamite, rifles, carbines and light and heavy machine guns, the revolutionaries managed to take the whole province of Asturias committing numerous murders of policemen, clergymen and civilians and destroying religious buildings including churches, convents and part of the university at Oviedo.[105][106][107] In the occupied areas the rebels officially declared the proletarian revolution and abolished regular money.[108]
The war minister, Diego Hidalgo wanted General Franco to lead the troops. However, President Alcalá-Zamora, aware of Franco's monarchist sympathies, opted to send General López Ochoa to Asturias to lead the government forces; hoping that his reputation as a loyal Republican would minimize the bloodshed.[109] Franco was put in informal command of the military effort against the revolt.[110]
Government troops, some brought in from Spain's Army of Africa,[111] killed men, women and children and carried out summary executions after the main cities of Asturias were retaken.[112][3] About 1,000 workers were killed, with about 250 government soldiers left dead.[113] Atrocities were carried out by both sides.[114] The failed rising in Asturias marked the effective end of the Republic.[115] Months of retaliation and repression followed; torture was used on political prisoners.[116] Even moderate reformists within the CEDA became sidelined. The two generals in charge of the campaign, Franco and Manuel Goded Llopis, were seen as heroes.[117] Azaña was unsuccessfully made out to be a revolutionary criminal by his right-wing opponents.[118] Gil Robles once again prompted a cabinet collapse, and five positions in Lerroux's new government were conceded to CEDA, including one awarded to Gil Robles himself. Farm workers' wages were halved, and the military was purged of republican members and reformed. Those loyal to Robles were promoted, and Franco was made Chief of Staff.[119] Stanley Payne believes that in the perspective of contemporary European history the repression of the 1934 revolution was relatively mild and that the key leaders of the rebellion were treated with leniency.[120] There were no mass killing after the fighting was over as was in the case of the suppression of the Paris Commune or the Russian 1905 revolution; all death sentences were commuted aside from two, army sergeant and deserter Diego Vásquez, who fought alongside the miners, and a worker known as "El Pichilatu" who had committed serial killings. Little effort was actually made to suppress the organisations that had carried out the insurrection, resulting in most being functional again by 1935. Support for fascism was minimal and did not increase, while civil liberties were restored in full by 1935, after which the revolutionaries had a generous opportunity to pursue power through electoral means. [121]
With this rebellion against established political legitimate authority, the Socialists showed identical repudiation of representative institutional system that anarchists had practiced.[122] The Spanish historian Salvador de Madariaga, an Azaña's supporter, and an exiled vocal opponent of Francisco Franco asserted that: "The uprising of 1934 is unforgivable. The argument that Mr Gil Robles tried to destroy the Constitution to establish fascism was, at once, hypocritical and false. With the rebellion of 1934, the Spanish left lost even the shadow of moral authority to condemn the rebellion of 1936"[123][124][nb 8]
In 1935 Azaña and Indalecio Prieto started to unify the left and to combat its extreme elements. They staged large, popular rallies of what would become the
The government was weak, and the influence of the revolutionary
CEDA turned its campaign chest over to army plotter Emilio Mola. Monarchist José Calvo Sotelo replaced CEDA's Gil Robles as the right's leading spokesman in parliament.[132][135] The Falange expanded rapidly, and many members of the Juventudes de Acción Popular joined. They successfully created a sense of militancy on the streets to try to justify an authoritarian regime.[136] Prieto did his best to avoid revolution by promoting a series of public works and civil order reforms, including of parts of the military and civil guard. Largo Caballero took a different attitude, continuing to preach of an inevitable overthrow of society by the workers.[137] Largo Caballero also disagreed with Prieto's idea of a new Republican–Socialist coalition.[138] With Largo Caballero's acquiescence, communists alarmed the middle classes by quickly taking over the ranks of socialist organisations.[137] This alarmed the middle classes.[139] The division of the Popular Front prevented the government from using its power to prevent right-wing militancy.[138] The CEDA came under attack from the Falange, and Prieto's attempts at moderate reform were attacked by the Socialist Youth. Sotelo continued to do his best to make conciliation impossible.[138] Casares failed to heed Prieto's warnings of a military conspiracy involving several generals who disliked professional politicians and wanted to replace the government to prevent the dissolution of Spain.[140] The military coup of July that started the Spanish Civil War was devised with Mola as director and Sanjurjo as a figurehead leader.[141]
See also
Notes
- ^ His statement included the sentence "I am determined to have nothing to do with setting one of my countrymen against another in a fratricidal civil war." from Thomas (1961). pp. 18–19.
- ^ See also: es:Asociación Católica de Propagandistas (in Spanish)
- ^ According to (Thomas 1961, p. 31), it was estimated that around two-thirds of Spaniards were not practising Catholics.
- ^ See also: es:Pablo Martín Alonso (in Spanish)
- ^ Thomas (1961). p. 66. allocates 207 seats to the political right.
- ^ See also: es:Rafael Salazar Alonso (in Spanish)
- ^ See also: es:Domingo Batet (in Spanish)
- ^ In the original: "El alzamiento de 1934 es imperdonable. La decisión del presidente de la República de llamar al poder a la CEDA era inatacable y hasta debida desde hacía ya tiempo. El argumento de que el señor Gil Robles intentaba destruir la Constitución para instaurar el fascismo era, a la vez, hipócrita y falso. ….. Con la rebelión de 1934, la izquierda española perdió hasta la sombra de autoridad para condenar la rebelión de 1936."
Citations
- ^ a b (Beevor 2006, p. 23)
- ^ (Beevor 2006, pp. 25–26)
- ^ a b (Beevor 2006, pp. 31–32)
- ^ a b c (Beevor 2006, p. 8)
- ^ a b c d (Fraser 1979, pp. 38–39)
- ^ (Beevor 2006, p. 7)
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 18)
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 19)
- ^ a b c (Thomas 1961, p. 13)
- ^ a b (Preston 2006, p. 21)
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 22)
- ^ (Thomas 1961, p. 14)
- ^ a b (Preston 2006, p. 24)
- ^ a b c (Preston 2006, p. 25)
- ^ (Beevor 2006, p. 9)
- ^ (Thomas 1961, p. 25)
- ^ (Thomas 1961, p. 26)
- ^ Avilés Farré 2002, pp. 255–263.
- .
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 26)
- ^ a b (Beevor 2006, p. 13)
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 28)
- ^ a b (Thomas 1961, p. 15)
- ^ a b (Preston 2006, p. 29)
- ^ a b (Thomas 1961, p. 16)
- ^ a b (Preston 2006, p. 30)
- ^ (Preston 2006, pp. 32–33)
- ^ (Beevor 2006, p. 15)
- ^ a b c d e f (Preston 2006, pp. 34–35)
- ^ a b c (Beevor 2006, p. 20)
- ^ (Beevor 2006, p. 17)
- ^ (Thomas 1961, p. 17)
- ^ a b (Preston 2006, p. 36)
- ^ a b (Preston 2006, p. 37)
- ^ (Beevor 2006, p. 18)
- ^ (Thomas 1961, pp. 18–19)
- ^ a b c (Preston 2006, pp. 38–39)
- ^ (Thomas 1961, p. 21)
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 50)
- ^ (Thomas 1961, pp. 21–22)
- ^ a b (Preston 2006, pp. 41–42)
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 42)
- ^ a b (Beevor 2006, p. 22)
- ^ a b (Preston 2006, p. 43)
- ^ (Beevor 2006, p. 21)
- ^ a b (Preston 2006, p. 44)
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 45)
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 49)
- ^ (Thomas 1961, p. 61)
- ^ (Thomas 1961, pp. 48–49)
- ^ a b (Beevor 2006, p. 26)
- ^ (Thomas 2013, Chapter 5)
- ^ a b c (Preston 2006, pp. 46–47)
- ^ (Thomas 1961, p. 36)
- ^ (Preston 2006, pp. 47–48)
- ^ (Thomas 1961, p. 31)
- ^ a b (Thomas 1961, p. 47)
- ^ (Preston 2006, pp. 54–55)
- ^ a b (Preston 2006, p. 57)
- ^ a b (Preston 2006, p. 58)
- ^ (Thomas 1961, p. 60)
- ^ a b c d e (Preston 2006, p. 53)
- ^ (Lannon 1987, p. 181)
- ^ a b (Thomas 1961, p. 46)
- ^ a b (Beevor 2006, p. 24)
- ^ a b c (Hayes 1951, p. 91)
- ^ (Vincent 2007, p. 122)
- ^ (Smith 2009, p. 195)
- ^ (Paz 2001, p. 2)
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 54)
- ^ (Payne 1973, p. 632)
- ^ (Preston 2006, pp. 59–60)
- ^ a b (Preston 2006, p. 61)
- ^ a b (Thomas 1961, p. 62)
- ^ a b (Thomas 1961, p. 63)
- ^ a b (Hayes 1951, p. 93)
- ^ a b (Thomas 1961, p. 67)
- ^ (Beevor 2006, p. 28)
- ^ (Preston 2006, pp. 63–65)
- ^ (Thomas 1961, p. 71)
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 66)
- ^ a b (Preston 2006, p. 67)
- ^ (Preston 2006, pp. 66–67)
- ^ (Preston 2012, p. 84)
- ^ (Preston 2006, pp. 67–68)
- ^ a b (Thomas 1961, p. 75)
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 68)
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 69)
- ^ (Preston 2006, pp. 69–70)
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 70)
- ^ (Brincat 2005, p. 80)
- ^ "abc.es: "La quema de iglesias durante la Segunda República" 10 May 2012". Archived from the original on 26 October 2018. Retrieved 13 June 2014.
- ^ (Thomas 1961, p. 76)
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 71)
- ^ a b (Preston 2006, p. 72)
- ^ (Preston 2006, pp. 73–74)
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 75)
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 76)
- ^ (Thomas 1961, p. 78)
- ^ (Payne & Palacios 2014, p. 88)
- ^ a b c (Beevor 2006, p. 33)
- ^ (Thomas 1961, p. 79)
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 77)
- ^ (Thomas 1961, p. 80)
- ^ Orella Martínez|Mizerska-Wrotkowska, 2015
- ^ (Thomas 2001, pp. 131–132)
- ^ (Hayes 1951, p. 96)
- ^ (Payne 2004, p. 55)
- ^ (Payne & Palacios 2014, p. 90)
- ^ (Preston 2006, pp. 78–79)
- ^ (Thomas 1961, p. 81)
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 79)
- ^ (Thomas 1961, p. 84)
- ^ (Payne 1973, pp. 637–638)
- ^ (Preston 2006, pp. 79–80)
- ^ (Thomas 1961, pp. 84–85)
- ^ (Thomas 1961, p. 85)
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 80)
- ^ a b (Preston 2006, p. 81)
- ^ (Payne & Palacios 2014, p. 92)
- ^ (Payne 2006, pp. 100–103)
- ^ (Casanova 2010, p. 138)
- ^ Madariaga – Spain (1964) p. 416
- ^ Orella Martínez & Mizerska-Wrotkowska (2015)
- ^ (Preston 2006, pp. 82–83)
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 83)
- ^ a b (Preston 2006, p. 84)
- ^ (Thomas 1961, p. 99)
- ^ a b (Preston 2006, p. 85)
- ^ (Payne 1973, p. 643)
- ^ (Payne 1973, p. 642)
- ^ a b (Preston 1999, pp. 17–23)
- ^ (Trotsky 1936, pp. 125–126)
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 86)
- ^ (Thomas 1961, p. 100)
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 89)
- ^ a b (Preston 2006, p. 90)
- ^ a b c (Preston 2006, p. 92)
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 91)
- ^ (Preston 2006, p. 93)
- ^ (Beevor 2006, p. 49)
Sources
Books
- ISBN 978-0-297-84832-5.
- Casanova, Julián (2010). The Spanish Republic and Civil War. Cambridge University Press.
- ASIN B0014JCVS0.
- Fraser, Ronald (1979). Blood of Spain. London: ISBN 978-0-7126-6014-3.
- Lannon, Frances (1987). Privilege, Persecution, and Prophecy: The Catholic Church in Spain, 1875–1975. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0-19-821923-1.
- ISBN 978-0-299-06280-4. Archivedfrom the original on 18 February 2019. Retrieved 7 May 2011.
- ISBN 978-0300110654.
- JSTOR j.ctt1npgf9.
- ISBN 978-0-521-17470-1. Archivedfrom the original on 24 February 2021. Retrieved 8 June 2020.
- Payne, Stanley G.; Palacios, Jesús (2014). Franco: A Personal and Political Biography (1st ed.). University of Wisconsin Press.
- ISBN 978-0299302146.
- ISBN 978-0-00-723207-9.
- ISBN 978-0007404230.
- Smith, Angel (2009). Historical Dictionary of Spain. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-5849-7. Archivedfrom the original on 19 January 2023. Retrieved 17 October 2016.
- OCLC 395987.
- ISBN 978-0375755156.
- ISBN 978-0-7181-9293-8.
- Vincent, Mary (2007). Spain, 1833–2002. Oxford, UK; New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-873159-7.
Journals
- Brincat, Leo (4 November 2005). "Need for international condemnation of the Franco regime". Documents: working papers, 2006 ordinary session (first part) (Report). ISBN 978-92-871-5932-8. Document 10737.
- Paz, Jose Antonio Souto (1 January 2001). "Perspectives on religious freedom in Spain". from the original on 17 November 2010. Retrieved 25 October 2011.
- Preston, Paul (May 1999). "Franco and Azaña". OCLC 95360332.
- Trotsky, Leon (1936). "The Task in Spain". New International. 5 (4). New York: Marxists Internet Archive. Archived from the original on 25 August 2011. Retrieved 4 September 2011.
Further reading
- Brenan, Gerald (2014). The Spanish labyrinth : an account of the social and political background of the Civil War. First published 1943. (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1107431751.