Wissenschaft des Judentums
Part of a series on |
Jews and Judaism |
---|
"Wissenschaft des Judentums" (literally in
The Verein für Kultur und Wissenschaft der Juden
The first organized attempt at developing and disseminating Wissenschaft des Judentums was the Verein für Kultur und Wissenschaft der Juden (Society for Jewish Culture and Jewish Studies), founded around 1819 by
The failure of the Verein, attributable largely to the far greater attraction, amongst German Jews, of identification with German culture, was followed, significantly, by the conversion to Christianity of many of its leading figures, including Gans and Heine.[2]
The Wissenschaft des Judentums movement
Goals
Proponents of Wissenschaft des Judentums attempted to place Jewish culture on par with
Leopold Zunz (1794–1886), one of the movement's leading figures, devoted much of his work to rabbinic literature. At the time, Christian thinkers maintained that the Jews' contribution ended with the Bible, and Zunz began to publish in the area of post-biblical rabbinic literature. His essays "Etwas über die rabbinische Literatur" and "Zur Geschichte und Literatur" addressed this issue. His biography of Rashi of Troyes was pivotal. When the Prussian government forbade preaching sermons in German synagogues, on the grounds that the sermon was an exclusively Christian institution, Zunz wrote History of the Jewish Sermon in 1832. This work has been described as "the most important Jewish book published in the 19th century." It lays down principles for the investigation of the Rabbinic exegesis (Midrash) and of the siddur (prayer-book of the synagogue).
Attitude toward religion
Despite the outstanding scholarship of Wissenschaft personalities such as Zunz and Heinrich Graetz (most of whom pursued their scholarly labors on their own time as Privatgelehrte), the Wissenschaft movement as a whole had a tendency to present Judaism as an historical relic [6] with frequently apologetic overtones,[7] and often ignored matters of contemporary relevance:
Zunz felt obliged to assume that Judaism had come to an end, and that it was the task of Wissenschaft des Judentums to provide a judicious accounting of the varied and rich contributions which Judaism had made to civilization. In a similar spirit, Steinschneider is said to have once quipped that Wissenschaft des Judentums seeks to ensure that Judaism will receive a proper burial, in which scholarship amounts to an extended obituary properly eulogizing the deceased.[8]
Nevertheless, throughout most of its existence and despite certain of its most prominent practitioners, such as
Attitude toward earlier scholarship
Indeed, one detects in the writings of many Wissenschaft scholars not only an intense love of scholarship "for its own sake", but also a genuine affinity for the rabbis and scholars of old, whose works they find themselves documenting, editing, publishing, analyzing, and critiquing. Indeed, far from disparaging or despising the Jewish religion and its many generations of rabbinical scholars, the majority of Wissenschaft practitioners are very keen to take ownership of the Jewish scholarly tradition. They see themselves as the rightful heirs and successors to Saadia Gaon and Rashi and Hillel the Elder and Abraham ibn Ezra, and in those prior generations of scholars they see their own Wissenschaft spirit and likeness.
In the Wissenschaft approach to scholarship, then, the earlier generations of scholars become "de-sanctified" and "re-humanized". Wissenschaft scholars feel completely free to pass judgment on the intellectual and scholarly capacities of earlier scholars, evaluating their originality, competence, and credibility, and pointing out their failures and limitations. The Wissenschaft scholars, while respectful of their predecessors, have no patience for a concept such as
Legacy
Although the Wissenschaft movement produced a vast number of scholarly publications of lasting value, and its influence still reverberates through
Opposition
The Wissenschaft movement drew criticism from traditional elements in the Jewish community, who regarded it as sterile at best, and at worst damaging to the religious community. A key opposition leader was Samson Raphael Hirsch. He and other traditional religious scholars representing urban and sophisticated Orthodox constituencies regarded the Wissenschaft movement as failing to meet the needs of the living Jewish community; Mendes-Flohr observes in this context that historians, by virtue of their craft, necessarily "transform traditional knowledge, draining it of its sacral power."[14] The Orthodox orientation of Wissenschaft figures such as David Zvi Hoffmann did not spare them from Hirsch's condemnation.
Guttmann and his Philosophie des Judentums
, etc. The English title is The Philosophy of Judaism: The History of Jewish Philosophy from Biblical Times to Franz Rosenzweig (New York, 1964).Roth sees in this publication "the last product in the direct line of the authentic Judaeo-German 'Science of Judaism'" (more commonly known as Wissenschaft des Judentums).
The original German edition of Philosophie des Judentums ends with
List of Wissenschaft des Judentums personalities
- Hermann Cohen
- Wilhelm Bacher
- Eduard Gans
- Heinrich Graetz
- Julius Guttmann
- Heinrich Heine
- David Zvi Hoffmann
- Moses Moser
- Solomon Judah Loeb Rapoport
- Solomon Schechter
- Moritz Steinschneider
- Leopold Zunz
- Samuel David Luzzatto
- Ismar Elbogen
- Isaiah Sonne
See also
Notes
- ^ Benzion Dinur (Dinaburg), "Wissenschaft des Judentums", Encyclopaedia Judaica (2nd. Ed., 2007)
- ^ VEREIN FÜR CULTUR UND WISSENSCHAFT DER JUDEN in the Jewish Encyclopedia (1901-1906).
- ^ Elon 2003, p. 110.
- ^ Dr. Henry Abramson, Who Was Philo Judaeus of Alexandria?, minutes: 49:41–50:19, speaking on the Wissenschaft des Judentums.
- ^ Langton, Daniel R. "Wandering Jews in England’s Green and Pleasant Land: Wissenschaft des Judentums in an Anglo-Jewish Context" in Wissenschaft des Judentums in Europe: Comparative and Transnational Perspectives Studia Judaica 76. editor Christian Wiese; Mirjam Thulin. Berlin: de Gruyter, Walter GmbH & Co, 2014.
- ^ Mendes-Flohr1998 [page needed]
- ^ Meyer 2004 [page needed]
- ^ Mendes-Flohr 1998, p. 41.
- ^ Meyer 2004, pp. 105–106.
- ^ Elon 2003, p. 112.
- ^ Meyer 2004, p. 106.
- ^ Meyer 2004 [page needed]
- ^ Elon 2003, p. 112.
- ^ Mendes-Flohr 1998, p. 45
- ^ Roth (1999, p. 3).
- ^ Roth (1999).[page needed]
- ^ Werblowsky (1964, p. ix).
References
- Elon, Amos (2003). The Pity of it All. Picador. ISBN 978-0-312-42281-3.
- Glatzer, Nahum N. (1964), "The beginnings of modern Jewish studies", in Altmann, Alexander (ed.), Studies in Nineteenth-Century Jewish Intellectual History, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 27–45.
- Levy, David B. (2002), "The Making of the ENCYCLOPAEDIA JUDAICA and the JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA" (PDF), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Convention of the Association of Jewish Libraries, Denver, CO, retrieved January 1, 2007
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link). - Mendes-Flohr, Paul (1998), "Jewish scholarship as a vocation", in Alfred L. Ivry, Elliot R. Wolfson & Allan Arkush (ed.), Perspectives on ISBN 9789057021947.
- Meyer, Michael A. (2004), "Two persistent tensions within Wissenschaft des Judentums" (PDF), Modern Judaism, 24 (2): 105–119, .
- Roth, Leon (1999) [1962]. Is there a Jewish Philosophy? Rethinking Fundamentals. London: Littman Library of Jewish Civilization.
- ISBN 0-87451-664-1
- Werblowsky, R. J. Zwi (1964). Introduction. Philosophies of Judaism: The History of Jewish Philosophy from Biblical Times to Franz. By Julius Guttmann. Translated by David W. Silverman. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Further reading
- George Y. Kohler, "Judaism Buried or Revitalised? ‘Wissenschaft des Judentums’ in Nineteenth Century Germany – Impact, Actuality and Applicability Today", in: Jewish Thought and Jewish Belief, (ed. Daniel J. Lasker), Beer Sheva 2012, p. 27-63.
- Michael A. Meyer, “Jewish Religious Reform and Wissenschaft des Judentums: The Positions of Zunz, Geiger and Frankel”, in: Leo Baeck Institute Year Book 16 (1971), pp. 19–41.
- Michael A. Meyer, “Two Persistent Tensions within Wissenschaft des Judentums”, in: Modern Judaism and Historical Consciousness, (ed. C. Wiese and A. Gotzmann), Leiden 2007, p. 73-89.
- Ismar Schorsch “Scholarship in the Service of Reform”, Leo Baeck Institute Year Book 35, 1990, pp. 73–101.
External links
- Entry "Wissenschaft Des Judentums" by Benzion Dinur (Dinaburg) in the Encyclopaedia Judaica (2nd. Ed., 2007)
- Goldestein Goren Intl. Center, e-lectures Wissenschaft des Judentums [1]
- Iancu, Carol From the "Science of Judaism" to the "New Israeli historians" - landmarks for a history of Jewish historiography [2]
- "The Freimann Collection." Digitized books based on Aron Freimann’s Wissenschaft des Judentums bibliography (Katalog der Judaica und Hebraica, Erster Band: Judaica, Frankfurt am Main: Stadtbibliothek Frankfurt am Main, 1932), from the collections of the Leo Baeck Institute, American Jewish Historical Society, American Sephardi Federation, YIVO Institute for Jewish Research, and other international collections
- Cultures of Wissenschaft des Judentums at 200. Zeitschrift der Vereinigung für Jüdische Studien e. V. / Journal of the German Association for Jewish Studies Online access to English articles