New Order (Nazism)
Part of a series on |
Nazism |
---|
![]() |
Part of a series on |
Fascism |
---|
![]() |
The New Order (German: Neuordnung) of Europe was the political and social system that Nazi Germany wanted to impose on the areas of Europe that it conquered and occupied.
Planning for the Neuordnung had already begun long before the start of World War II, but Adolf Hitler proclaimed a "European New Order" publicly on 30 January 1941: "The year 1941 will be, I am convinced, the historical year of a great European New Order!"[1]
Among other things, the New Order envisaged the formation of a
Historians remain divided as to the ultimate New Order goals – some believe that the New Order was to be limited to Nazi German domination of Europe, while others see it as a springboard for eventual world conquest and the establishment of a world government under German control.[4]
The Führer gave expression to his unshakable conviction that the Reich will be the master of all Europe. We shall yet have to engage in many fights, but these will undoubtedly lead to most wonderful victories. From there on the way to world domination is practically certain. Whoever dominates Europe will thereby assume the leadership of the world.
—Reich Minister of Propaganda, 8 May 1943[5]
Origin of the term
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4d/World_War_II_in_Europe%2C_1942.svg/350px-World_War_II_in_Europe%2C_1942.svg.png)
The term Neuordnung originally had a more limited meaning than it did later. It is typically translated as "New Order", but a more correct translation would be more akin to "reorganization".
According to the Nazi government, that principle was pursued by Germany to secure a fair rearrangement of territory for the common benefit of a new, economically integrated Europe,[9] which in Nazi terminology meant the continent of Europe with the exception of the "Asiatic" Soviet Union.[10] Nazi racial views regarded the "Judeo-Bolshevist" Soviet state as both a criminal institution which needed to be destroyed, and as a barbarian place lacking any culture that would give it a "European" character.[11] Therefore, Neuordnung was rarely used in reference to Soviet Russia, because the Nazis believed it did not feature any elements that could be re-organized along Nazi lines.
The objective was to ensure a state of total post-war continental hegemony for Nazi Germany.[12] That was to be achieved by the expansion of the territorial base of the German state itself, combined with the political and economic subjugation of the rest of Europe to Germany. Eventual extensions of the project to areas beyond Europe, as well as on an ultimately global scale, were anticipated for the future period in which Germany would have secured unchallenged control over her own continent, but Neuordnung did not carry that extra-European meaning at the time.
Through its wide use in Nazi propaganda, the phrase quickly gained resonance in Western media. In English-language academic circles especially, it eventually carried a much more inclusive definition, and was increasingly used to refer to the foreign and domestic policies, and the war aims, of the Nazi state, and of its dictatorial leader Adolf Hitler. Therefore, the phrase had approximately the same connotations as the term co-prosperity sphere did in Japanese circles, in reference to their planned imperial domain. Nowadays, it is generally used to refer to all the post-war plans and policies, both in and outside of Europe, that the Nazis expected to implement after the anticipated victory of Germany and the other Axis powers in World War II.[citation needed]
Ideological background
Nazi bio-politics
The
Polish academic Raphael Lemkin wrote in 1944:
"...according to the doctrine of
Germanization can only be carried out with the soil and never with men."[15], "Axis Rule in Occupied Europe", Chapter IX: Genocide, pp. 80, 81
Geopolitical strategy
Hitler's ideas about the eastward expansion that he promulgated in
In Mein Kampf he had envisioned a league with
Anticipated territorial extent of Nazi imperialism
In a subsequently published speech given at
Alfred Rosenberg saw the future structure of Europe in 1934 as the result of a four-power pact formed by the nationalist movements of Italy, France, England, and Germany. The Baltic Sea states (Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania) and the Danube region (Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Yugoslavia and Bulgaria) should also be included to form an "organic Mitteleuropa".[22]
Joseph Goebbels in his diaries was convinced in the formula "Whoever dominates Europe will thereby assume the leadership of the world" and that was the main objective of the fuhrer.[24]
Implementation in Europe
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/25/New_European_Order.jpg/220px-New_European_Order.jpg)
Military campaigns in Poland and Western Europe
The initial phase of the establishment of the New Order was:
- First, the signing of the raw materials due to an expected British naval blockade.
- Second, the Blitzkrieg attacks in northern and western Europe (Operation Weserübung and the Battle of France respectively) to neutralize opposition from the west. This resulted in the conquest of Denmark, Norway, Luxembourg, Belgium, the Netherlands, and France, all of which were under German rule by the early summer of 1940.
Had the British been defeated by Germany, the political re-ordering of Western Europe would have been accomplished. There was to be no post-war general
One of the primary German foreign policy aims throughout the 1930s had been to establish a military alliance with the United Kingdom, and despite anti-British policies having been adopted as this proved impossible, hope remained that the UK would in time yet become a reliable German ally.
William L. Shirer, however, claims that the British male population between 17 and 45 would have been forcibly transferred to the continent to be used as industrial slave labour (although possibly with better treatment than similar forced labor from Eastern Europe) and the remaining British females were to be impregnated by German soldiers ensuring that Britain would be fully Germanised within one or two subsequent generations.[29]
The remaining population would have been terrorized, including civilian hostages being taken and the death penalty immediately imposed for even the most trivial acts of resistance, with the UK being plundered for anything of financial, military, industrial or cultural value, being established a Military Administration of England (applied to all areas of the United Kingdom), with the main objective being the transformation of the British economy into Germany's main war workshop.[30] While German workers sent to England would keep the war machine operating with minimum interruption, with the British industrial production being directed towards the Eastern front. The Germans, according to Shirer, would extract agricultural goods, raw ore, fuel, rubber, textiles, leather and timber.[31] Also, the Einsatzgruppen, led by Dr. Franz Six, were to be unleashed to round up and execute all political, intellectual and public figures who had previously spoken out against the Nazis and other people who might in the future cause problems for the occupying forces.[32]
After the war, Otto Bräutigam of the Reich Ministry for the Occupied Eastern Territories claimed in his book that in February 1943 he had the opportunity to read a personal report by Wagner regarding a discussion with Heinrich Himmler, in which Himmler had expressed the intention to exterminate about 80% of the populations of France and England by special forces of the SD after the German victory.[33]
During the proposed invasion of Great Britain through Operation Sea Lion, there were plans to invade neutral Ireland through Operation Green, in which were instructions to dismantle and liquidate any of Ireland’s remaining indigenous political apparatus, intellectual leadership, and any non-Aryan social institutions, with curfews being imposed on the local population, as well as plans to commandeer resources from locals.[34]
By annexing large
A post-war Britain was to be divided into districts under the charge of army commanders, who were to act as "governors". Subordinated to them were field and town units.
Establishment of a Greater Germanic Reich
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0b/Greater_Germanic_Reich.png/300px-Greater_Germanic_Reich.png)
One of the most elaborate Nazi projects initiated in the newly conquered territories during this period of the war was the planned establishment of a "Greater Germanic Reich of the German Nation" (Großgermanisches Reich Deutscher Nation).
Establishment of German domination in Southeast Europe
Immediately prior to Germany's invasion of the
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/43/South_german_buffer_state_1941.png/290px-South_german_buffer_state_1941.png)
Hitler observed that permanent German bases might be established in Belgrade (possibly to be renamed to Prinz-Eugen-Stadt) and Thessaloniki.[44] The Reichfestung Belgrad had been referred to in a "great secret memorandum" by Secretary of State and SS Brigade Chief Wilhelm Stuckart in 1941, being about the situation and future fate of Germany in the territories of the former Yugoslavia, based on scripts of 1939 from Werner Lorenz and the Hauptamt Volksdeutsche Mittelstelle.[45][46] Names such as Prinz-Eugen-Gau, Reichsgau Banat, Donauprotektorat, Schwabenland, Donaudeutschland or Autonomes Siebenbürgen were proposed to designate said territory. This buffer state of Germans of Serbia would have been for the purpose of ensuring permanent German supremacy over the Danube basin, and then, to plan an economic reorganization of the Balkans. The resettlement of Germans in this administrative division was planned to be the logical consequence.[47][48][49]
Even without the annexation of the Banat to the Greater Germanic Reich, the Southeast European states would have remained only formally independent, while in reality their economic and military domination would have gravitated as satellites in the German hegemonic orbit, in a similar dependency like the Mitteleuropa plans of World War I.
Conquest of Lebensraum in Eastern Europe
And so we National Socialists consciously draw a line beneath the foreign policy tendency of our pre-War period. We take up where we broke off six hundred years ago. We stop the endless German movement to the south and west, and turn our gaze toward the land in the east. At long last we break off the colonial and commercial policy of the pre-War period and shift to the soil policy of the future. If we speak of soil in Europe today, we can primarily have in mind only Russia and her vassal border states.
— Adolf Hitler in Mein Kampf on Lebensraum in the East.[50]
Adolf Hitler in Mein Kampf argued in the chapter "Eastern Orientation or Eastern Policy" that the Germans needed Lebensraum in the East and described it as a "historic destiny" which would properly nurture the future generations of Germans. Hitler believed that "the organization of a Russian state formation was not the result of the political abilities of the Slavs in Russia, but only a wonderful example of the state-forming efficacity of the German element in an inferior race." Hitler spoke on 3 February 1933 to the staff of the army and declared that Germany's problems could be solved by "the conquest of new living space in the east and its ruthless Germanization".[51] His earlier invasions of Czechoslovakia and Poland can be directly connected to his desire for Lebensraum in Mein Kampf.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/36/Operation_Barbarossa_corrected_border.png/250px-Operation_Barbarossa_corrected_border.png)
Implementation of the long-term plan for the New Order was begun on June 22, 1941 with
Furthermore, Hitler hoped to turn Germany into a total blockade-proof
By 1942, the quasi-colonial regimes called the
German women were encouraged to have as many children as possible to populate the newly acquired Eastern territories. To encourage this fertility policy, the
Rosenberg viewed the political goal of Operation Barbarossa as not merely the destruction of the Bolshevik regime, but the "reversing of Russian dynamism" towards the east (Siberia) and the freeing of the Reich of the "eastern nightmare for centuries to come" by eliminating the Russian state, regardless of its political ideology.[57] The continued existence of Russia as a potential instigator of pan-Slavism and its suggestive power over other Slavic peoples in the fight between "Germandom" and "Slavism" was seen as a major threat.[58] This was to be solved by exploiting ethnic centrifugal forces and limiting the influence of "Greater Russiandom" (Großrussentum) by promoting segmentation in the manner of divide and conquer.
In a memorandum sent to Rosenberg in March 1942, Nazi anthropologist
A series of "semantic guidelines" published by the
Re-settlement efforts
By 1942, Hitler's empire encompassed much of Europe, but the territories annexed lacked population desired by the Nazis.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1c/Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-J09397%2C_Lodz%2C_Millionster_Umsiedler_im_Wartheland.jpg/250px-Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-J09397%2C_Lodz%2C_Millionster_Umsiedler_im_Wartheland.jpg)
At the end of 1942 a total of 629,000 Volksdeutsche had been re-settled, and preparations for the transfer of 393,000 others were underway.
Territory of origin | Total | Re-settled in annexed eastern territories |
---|---|---|
Estonia and Latvia | 76,895 | 57,249 |
Lithuania | 51,076 | 30,315 |
Volhynia , Galicia, Narew |
136,958 | 109,482 |
Eastern Government-General | 32,960 | 25,956 |
Bessarabia | 93,342 | 89,201 |
Northern Bukovina | 43,670 | 24,203 |
Southern Bukovina | 52,149 | 40,804 |
Dobruja | 15,454 | 11,812 |
Romania, Regat | 10,115 | 1,129 |
Gottschee and Ljubljana | 15,008 | 13,143 |
Bulgaria | 1,945 | 226 |
Residual Serbia |
2,900 | 350 |
Russia |
350,000 | 177,146 |
Greece | 250 | |
Bosnia |
18,437 | 3,698 |
Slovakia | 98 | |
South Tyrol | 88,630 | Reich, Protectorate, Luxembourg: 68,162 |
France | 19,226 | Alsace, Lorraine, Luxembourg, Reich, Protectorate: 9,572 |
Total | 1,009,113 | 662,448 |
SS State of Burgundy
According to Felix Kersten's memoirs, Himmler planned to create an SS state in the region of Burgundy, with its own laws, army, government, currency, and its own embassy in Berlin. The state was supposed to have access both to the English Channel and the Mediterranean, and was going to include the old Burgundian possessions, Artois, Hainault, Luxembourg, Lorraine, Franche-Comté, the old Duchy of Burgundy, Dauphiné, Provence, Pícardy, Amiens, Champagne, Reims and Troyes. It would have been governed by a Reich administrator and a Chancellor, and the Order of the Golden Fleece was to be revived, with its grand master being a French SS leader. The state's official languages would be German and French. Burgundy was supposed to be a model Aryan, pan-European state.[65]
Spain and Portugal
Spanish dictator General
About a hypothetical
During the summer of 1940, Hitler considered the possibility of occupying the Portuguese territories of
After the Spanish refusal to join the war after Meeting at Hendaye (in which Hitler threatened Franco with a possible annexation of Spanish territory by Vichy France), Spain and Portugal were expected to be invaded and become puppet states. They were to turn over coastal cities and islands in the Atlantic to Germany as part of the Atlantic Wall and to serve as German naval facilities. Portugal was to cede Portuguese Mozambique and Portuguese Angola as part of the intended Mittelafrika colonial project.[74]
Also, Nazis supported with propaganda the Latin Bloc proposed by Mussolini and approved by Francisco Franco to create a "Rome-Madrid axis" with Vichy French leader Petain.[75] Their main objective was to defy Britain domain in the Mediterranean region.[76] However, Mussolini and Franco hoped to balance the power between Latin countries to avoid a German preponderance.[77]
Plans for other parts of the world outside Europe
Plans for the establishment of an African colonial dominion
Hitler's geopolitical thoughts about Africa always occupied a secondary position to his expansionist aims in Europe itself. His public announcements prior to outbreak of the war that Germany's former colonies be returned to it served primarily as bargaining chips to further territorial goals in Europe itself. Africa was nevertheless expected to fall under German control in some way or another after Germany had first achieved supremacy over its own continent.[78]
Hitler's overall intentions for the future organization of Africa divided the continent into three overall. The northern third was to be assigned to its
In 1940 the
In contrast to territories that were to be acquired in Europe itself (specifically
The area included all pre-1914 German colonial territories in Africa, as well as additional parts of the French, Belgian and British colonial holdings in Africa. These included the
A second part of the plan entailed the construction of a huge string of fortified naval and air bases for future operations against the Western hemisphere, spanning much of the Atlantic coastline of Europe and Africa from Trondheim in Norway all the way down to the Belgian Congo, as well as many off-lying islands such as Cape Verde and the Azores. A less extensive but similar initiative was intended for the east coast of Africa.
Division of Asia between the Axis powers
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d5/Yeniseirivermap.png/200px-Yeniseirivermap.png)
In 1942, a secret diplomatic conference was held between Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan in which they agreed to divide
The treaty proved to be detrimental for Axis strategic cooperation in the Indian Ocean, as crossing the boundary line required tedious prior consultation.
Concession of Oceania to Japan
Germany's
Middle East and Central Asia
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9d/Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-1987-004-09A%2C_Amin_al_Husseini_und_Adolf_Hitler.jpg/300px-Bundesarchiv_Bild_146-1987-004-09A%2C_Amin_al_Husseini_und_Adolf_Hitler.jpg)
After the projected fall of the Soviet Union, Hitler planned to intensify the
Also, some Nazi leaders were convinced of the necessity of restoring Armenia as an independent country (with German protection) against the menace of the Soviet Union, the Armenian Legion being promised the restoration of Greater Armenia. This project could have been a balancing idea against Turkish aspirations in the Caucasus about an unification with Azerbaijan under the name of "Büyük Turan" [Great Turan, with would pose a threat to Germany and their aspirations.[100][101] However, Hitler did not trust to Armenian aspirations, considering as very risky the formation of purely Caucasian battalions and making these kinds of promises to the Ostlegionen, preferring instead to support Muslims.[102]
Allied-occupied Iran was also to be drawn into the Axis camp, possibly by the means of an uprising.[92] The possibility of Iran as an anti-Soviet bastion was already considered in the 1930s, and coincided with Hitler's declaration of Iran as an "Aryan country" (the name Iran literally means "homeland of the Aryans" in Persian). The changing of Persia's name to Iran in 1935 was done by the Shah at the suggestion of the German ambassador to Iran as an act of "Aryan solidarity".[103] However the Iranians had always called their country "Iran", a name that predated the rise of Nazi Germany by more than a thousand years.[104] In 1936, the Hitler cabinet declared Iranians to be immune to the Nuremberg Laws, as they were considered to be "pure Aryans".[105] On the eve of World War II Germany was already Iran's single-biggest trading partner, followed by the Soviet Union, United Kingdom, and the United States.[103] In 1939, Nazi Germany sent over 7500 books with racial tones advocating for greater collaboration between Persians and Germans. The German Scientific Library contained over 7500 books selected "to convince Iranian readers... of the kinship between the National Socialist Reich and the Aryan culture of Iran".[106] In the new order, Hitler personally promised that, after the defeat of Soviet Union, he would return all of the Persian land taken by Russians (during the Russo-Persian Wars of nineteenth and twentieth centuries). Also, the economic plans of Hjalmar Schacht for the global outreach of the Nazi economy coincided with the nationalist desires of Reza Shah's Iran for industrial modernization, investing a lot of capital for Iranian infrastructure. Iran, Afghanistan, and Turkey were planned to be part of a "northern tier" of buffer states, against the Soviet global menace, in which economic interests of each country were of primary importance, instead of only German interests.[107][108] The Aryan sense of friendship also assisted in political rapprochement between Iran and Germany.[109] Also, according to Operation Orient, Germans wanted to march through Iran and Iraq in force, finally converging in India.
During pre-war diplomatic maneuvers, the
The
Although initially intending to concede Italy control of the region, after that country
In the nature of things, this territory was becoming an Italian preserve and it was as such that the Duce laid claim to it. Had we been on our own, we could have emancipated the Moslem countries dominated by France; and that would have had enormous repercussions in the Near East, dominated by Britain, and in Egypt. But with our fortunes linked to those of the Italians, the pursuit of such a policy was not possible. All Islam vibrated at the news of our victories. The Egyptians, the Iraqis and the whole of the Near East were all ready to rise in revolt. Just think what we could have done to help them, even to incite them, as would have been both our duty and in our own interest! But the presence of the Italians at our side paralyzed us; it created a feeling of malaise among our Islamic friends, who inevitably saw in us accomplices, willing or unwilling, of their oppressors.
Despite this, Hitler saw Arab support as a mere asset for his plans of conquest. He "wanted nothing from the Arabs"[116] and found genuine cooperation between Aryans and Arabs to be implausible due to the latter's racial inferiority:[117]
Exploitation of the Arab Freedom Movement. The situation of the English in the Middle East will be rendered more precarious, in the event of major German operations, if more British forces are tied down at the right moment by civil commotion or revolt. All military, political, and propaganda measures to this end must be closely coordinated during the preparatory period. As central agency abroad I nominate Special Staff F, which is to take part in all plans and actions in the Arab area, whose headquarters are to be in the area of the Commander Armed Forces South-east. The most competent available experts and agents will be made available to it. The Chief of the High Command of the Armed Forces will specify the duties of Special Staff F, in agreement with the Foreign Minister where political questions are involved.[118]
Plans for India
Hitler's views on India were generally disparaging, and his plans for the region were heavily influenced by his racial views, especially related to India's subdued status under British rule.
Nazi theorist
During the first years of the war in Europe, as Hitler sought to reach an arrangement with the British, he held the notion that India should remain under British control after the war, as in his mind the only alternative was a Soviet occupation of the subcontinent.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/62/Planned_partition_of_Asia.png/220px-Planned_partition_of_Asia.png)
Indian revolutionary
On 18 January 1942, it was decided that the Indian subcontinent was to be divided between the Axis powers. Germany was to take the part of British India roughly corresponding to the western part of modern-day Pakistan, while the rest of British India, along with Afghanistan, was marked for Japan.[127][128]
Plans for North America
Before completing the expected German conquest of Europe, the Nazi leadership hoped to keep the United States out of the war.[129] In an interview with Life in the spring of 1941, Hitler stated that a German invasion of the Western Hemisphere was as fantastic as an invasion of the moon, and he said he was convinced that the idea was being promoted by men who mistakenly thought that war would be good for business.[130]
U.S. pro-Nazi movements such as the
As a boy, Hitler had been an enthusiastic reader of Karl May westerns[13] and he told Albert Speer that he still turned to them for inspiration as an adult when he was in a tight spot.[137] The influence of Karl May's writing in Hitler Youth and German society generated the belief that native people somehow possessed a quasi-Aryan nature in its Volk (however, they were still Untermensch).[138] Nazis pragmatically utilized popular tropes of Indian imagery (Indianthusiasm) to use against the US.[139] Also, in the late 1930s, Nazis even attempted to enlist American Indian support, mostly from Sioux and Lakota peoples, for Nazi Germany,[140] The Nazis had hoped to incite an uprising by the "hemispheric Indian" against their brutal treatment, creating allies and instability to undermine American arguments for the moral superiority of democracy.[141]
Approximately nine months before the United States joined the Allies, U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt made a reference to the New Order in a speech he gave on March 15, 1941, recognizing Hitler's hostility towards the United States and the destructive potential it represented, about which Roosevelt was quite acutely aware:
...Nazi forces are not seeking mere modifications in colonial maps or in minor European boundaries. They openly seek the destruction of all elective systems of government on every continent, including our own. They seek to establish systems of government based on the regimentation of all human beings by a handful of individual rulers who seize power by force.
Yes, these men and their hypnotized followers call this a "New Order." It is not new, and it is not order. For order among nations presupposes something enduring, some system of justice under which individuals over a long period of time are willing to live. Humanity will never permanently accept a system imposed by conquest, and based on slavery. These modern tyrants find it necessary to their plans to eliminate all democracies—eliminate them one by one. The nations of Europe, and indeed we, ourselves, did not appreciate that purpose. We do now.[142]
Hitler held U.S. society in contempt, stating that the United States (which he consistently referred to as the "American Union") was "half Judaized, and the other half Negrified"
Hitler also considered the occupation of the Portuguese Azores, Cape Verde, and Madeira and the Spanish Canary Islands to deny the British a staging ground for military actions against
In July 1941, Hitler approached Japanese ambassador Ōshima with an offer to wage a joint struggle against the U.S.
In this final battle for world domination, Hitler expected the defeated British to eventually support the Axis forces with its large navy.[148] He stated that "England and America will one day have a war with one another, which will be waged with the greatest hatred imaginable. One of the two countries will have to disappear."[152] and "I shall no longer be there to see it, but I rejoice on behalf of the German people at the idea that one day we will see England and Germany marching together against America".[153]
The actual physical conquest of the United States was unlikely, however, Further decisions down the line were left up to future generations of German rulers.
This lack of policy direction from the top meant that Nazi politicians concerned with representing Germany's interests and relations with Canada had to resort to an improvised line of policy which they believed to be in accordance with Hitler's wishes.[159] The country was noted for its abundance of natural resources, and because of its great geographic size coupled with a low population density was characterized as "a country without people", in contrast to Germany which was considered "a people without space".[159] In his 1934 travelogue account of Canada, Zwischen USA und dem Pol (English: Between the U.S. and the North Pole), German journalist Colin Ross described Canadian society as artificial because it was composed of many different parts that weren't tied together by either blood or long-standing traditions (highlighting the differences between the French and English Canadians in particular), and that for this reason one could not speak of either a Canadian nation or Volk.[161] As a result, the country's political system was also considered mechanical and non-organic, and that Ottawa did not constitute "the heart of the nation". Because of both these factors the Canadians were deemed incapable of comprehending "true culture", and German immigration in Canada was considered a mistake because they would be forced to live in an "empty civilization".[162]
Plans for the economic domination of South America
Neither Hitler nor any other major Nazi leader showed much interest towards
On 27 October 1941 Roosevelt stated in a speech "I have in my possession a secret map, made in Germany by Hitler's government, by planners of the new world order. It is a map of South America and part of Central America as Hitler proposes to organize it" into five countries under German domination. The speech amazed both the United States and Germany; the latter claimed the map was a forgery. While
Plans for future wars against Asia
Although it pursued an alliance with Imperial Japan in the battle against the "Western Plutocracies" and Soviet Bolshevism which was based on Realpolitik, the Nazi leadership believed that its alliance with Japan was only temporary. The racial ideology of Nazism predicted that the fate of human civilization depended on the ultimate triumph of the Germanic-Nordic peoples, and according to it, the populous Asian continent was seen as the greatest threat to the hegemony of the white race. The Japanese people were characterized as 'culture-bearers', which meant that they could make use of the technological and civilizational achievements of the Aryan race and by so doing, they could maintain an advanced society, but they could not truly create a 'culture' themselves.[173] Gerhard Weinberg asserts that the historical evidence points to the conclusion that Hitler, like he had done with the Soviets in the 1939–1941 period, employed a tactic of conceding to the Japanese whatever they desired until they in turn could be defeated in a subsequent war.[174] In early 1942, Hitler is quoted as saying to Ribbentrop: "We have to think in terms of centuries. Sooner or later there will have to be a showdown between the white and the yellow races."[175]
In July 1941, as plans were being laid out for post-Barbarossa military operations, the Wehrmacht's naval top-level command, the Oberkommando der Marine, was not ready to exclude the possibility of a war between Germany and Japan.[176] In 1942, NSDAP official Erhard Wetzel (Reich Ministry for the Occupied Eastern Territories) predicted that "the self-determination of the numerically strong Asian peoples after this war" would challenge German-controlled Europe with Japanese instigation, and stated that "a Greater Asia and an independent India are formations that dispose over hundreds of millions of inhabitants. A German world power with 80 or 85 million Germans by contrast is numerically too weak".[177] Wetzel further pondered on Germany's choices on the population policies in occupied Russia: if the Russians were restricted to having as few children as possible in the interest of German colonization, this would further "weaken the white race in view of the dangers of Asia".[177]
As the Japanese were conquering one European colonial territory after another in
In his speech which he made during the meeting of SS major generals in Posen on 4 October 1943, Heinrich Himmler commented on future conflicts between Nazi-controlled Europe and Asia:
[W]e will create the necessary conditions for the whole Germanic people and the whole of Europe, controlled, ordered and led by us, the Germanic people, to be able, in generations, to stand the test in her battles of destiny against Asia, who will certainly break out again. We do not know when that will be. Then, when the mass of humanity of 1 to 1½ [billion] lines up against us, the Germanic people, numbering, I hope, 250 to 300 million, and the other European peoples, making a total of 600 to 700 million – (and with
an outpost area stretching as far as the Urals, or, a hundred years, beyond the Urals) – must stand the test in its vital struggle against Asia. It would be an evil day if the Germanic people did not survive it. It would be the end of beauty and "Kultur", of the creative power of this earth. That is the distant future. It is for that that we are fighting, pledged to hand down the heritage of our ancestors.[179]
Himmler addressed this apocalyptic vision in an earlier speech which he made in the presence of SS generals at the
These clashes are the only
evolutionary possibility which will enable us one day, now that Fate has given us the Führer Adolf Hitler, to create the Germanic Reich. They are the necessary condition, for our race, and our blood to create for itself and put under cultivation, in the years of peace (during which we must live and work austerely, frugally and like Spartans), that settlement area in which new blood can breed, as in a botanical garden so to speak. Only by this means can the Continent become a Germanic Continent, capable of daring to embark, in one or two or three or five or ten generations, on the conflict with this Continent of Asia which spews out hordes of humanity.[180]
End of the New Order project
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d1/1945-03-01GerWW2BattlefrontAtlas.jpg/250px-1945-03-01GerWW2BattlefrontAtlas.jpg)
After the decisive German defeat at the end of the
Late in the war, after the failure of the final
See also
- Areas annexed by Nazi Germany
- Greater Germanic Reich, the dominion which the Nazis attempted to create by merging all of the Germanic-populated countries in Europe into one state.
- Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, the envisioned Japanese economic equivalent of the New Order and the Greater Germanic Reich.
- A-A line
- Jewish settlement in the Japanese Empire
- The Ural Mountains in Nazi planning
- Wehrbauer
- Italian imperialism under fascism, the Fascist Italian project for securing domination of the Mediterranean area.
- Axis power negotiations on the division of Asia during World War II
- Grossdeutschland
- Drang nach Osten ("The Drive Eastward")
- Lebensborn
- Lebensraum
- Final solution
- Generalplan Ost
- The Holocaust
- Romani Holocaust
- European theater of World War II
- German-occupied Europe
- Nazi eugenics
- Nazi racial theories
- Racial policy of Nazi Germany
- New World Order (conspiracy theory) – a conspiracy theory that hypothesizes a secretly emerging totalitarian world government
- New world order (an international relations theory)
- Posen speeches – In two notable speeches delivered in October 1943, Himmler details the tasks of the SS in implementing the New Order.
- Hegemony
- Hypothetical Axis victory in World War II
Citations
- ^ Adolf Hitler speech at Berlin Sportpalast. [1]
- ^ a b c Gumkowski, Janusz; Leszczyński, Kazimierz (1961). Poland Under Nazi Occupation. Polonia Pub. House. [2]
- ^ Yoder, Fred Roy (1944). Introductory Sociology. State College of Washington. p. 248. Retrieved 12 August 2023.
[...] expansion policies and practices of Germany in southeastern Europe and Japan in Asia were likewise a major cause of World War II.
- ^ Lee, Stephen J. (1987). The European Dictatorships, 1918–1945, p. 196. Cambridge University Press.
- ^ The Goebbels Diaries, 1942–1943, p. 359
- ^ "Dict.cc | Neuordnung | English Dictionary".
- ISBN 9781935487593. Retrieved 21 February 2023.
The Black International, which operated under the name of the European New Order, held a summit at Barcelona on behalf of the Palestinians. The organization was composed of various Nazis and fascists from Nazi Germany, Vichy France, Franco's Spain, Salazar's Portugal, Mussolini's Italy, and the Greek colonels' military junta.
- ISBN 9780333981153. Retrieved 21 February 2023.
[...] the misguided belief in the existence of an international conspiracy often referred to as the 'black international' which allegedly co-ordinated neo-Nazi activity on a world-wide scale.
- ^ Spielvogel, Jackson J. (2006). Western Civilization Since 1789, Volume 3. Clark Baxter, p. 855. [3]
- ^ Martin Bormann's Minutes of a Meeting at Hitler's Headquarters (July 16, 1941). German History in Documents and Images. Retrieved 5 June 2011. Quoting Hitler: The Führer emphasized that we had to understand that the Europe of today was nothing but a geographical term; in reality Asia extended up to our frontiers.
- ^ Rich, Norman (1972). Hitler's War Aims: Ideology, the Nazi State and the Course of Expansion, p. 212.
- ^ Haffner, Sebastian (1979). The Meaning of Hitler. Macmillan Publishing Company Inc., p. 100. [4]
- ^ a b Hitler, Adolf Mein Kampf
- ^ Rosenberg, Alfred Der Mythus des 20. Jahrhunderts, 1930 ("The Myth of the 20th Century")
- ISBN 978-1-58477-901-8.
- ^ Geopolitics and Globalization in the Twentieth Century By Brian W. Blouet (2001):
- ^ Derwent, Whittlesey German Strategy for World Conquest New York: 1942 Farrar and Rinehart
- ^ Walsh, p. 9.
- JSTOR 3019298.
- ^ Weinberg, Gerhard L (2005). Visions of Victory: The Hopes of Eight World War II Leaders. Cambridge, England Cambridge University Press, pp. 8–9. [5]
- ISBN 0-521-56626-6.
- ^ Alfred Rosenberg: Krisis und Neubau Europas. Berlin 1934.
- ^ Heinrich Himmler's Posen Speech from 04.10.1943
- ISBN 9780837138152. Retrieved 17 May 2023.
- ^ Weinberg, A world at arms (2005), p. 175
- ^ a b c Rich 1974, p. 396.
- ^ Strobl 2000, p. 61.
- ^ Strobl 2000, pp. 202–208.
- ^ Shirer, p. 949
- ^ Shirer, pp. 782 & 943
- ^ a b "Now It Can Be Told! – This Was Hitler's Amazing Plan for Britain – The War Illustrated". www.tracesofwar.com. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
- ^ a b "Hitler's Dark Vision for the UK". Sky History TV channel. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
- ^ Bräutigam, Otto (1968). So hat es sich zugetragen... Germany: Holzner Verlag. p. 590.
- ^ "The strange history of the Nazi plans to invade Ireland". IrishCentral.com. 8 November 2022. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
- ^ ISBN 3-11-009724-9.
- ^ "The IRA's links with Nazi Germany | Frank Ryan | Queen's University Belfast". www.qub.ac.uk. 3 May 2012. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
- ^ "Irish Republicanism and Nazi Germany | Frank Ryan | Queen's University Belfast". www.qub.ac.uk. 31 January 2012. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
- ISSN 0029-7712. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
- ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
- Institut für Zeitgeschichte. 1999. Archived from the originalon 14 December 2013. Retrieved 27 January 2012.
- ^ Rich, Norman (1974). Hitler's War Aims: the Establishment of the New Order, p. 26. W. W. Norton & Company Inc., New York.
- ^ Rich (1974), pp. 24–25, 140.
- ISBN 0-389-20400-5.
- ^ Kroener et al. (2003), p. 165
- ^ Arnold Suppan: Hitler-Beneš-Tito. Konflikt, Krieg und Völkermord en Ostmittel- und Südosteuropa. Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien 2014, S. 1030
- ^ Österreichische Ostefte. Band 11–12, Österreichisches Ost- und Südosteuropa-Institut, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Ost, 1969, S. 22.
- ^ Hans-Ulrich Wehler , "Reichsfestung Belgrad". S. 73
- ISBN 978-3-525-01322-9.
- ^ "a) Umsiedlungspläne und -maßnahmen". doku.zentrum-gegen-vertreibung.de. Retrieved 17 May 2023.
- ^ Ian Kershaw, Hitler, 1889–1936: Hubris, p. 263
- ^ Ian Kershaw, Hitler, 1889–1936: Hubris, p. 472
- ISBN 0-7864-2054-5.
- ^ Padfield, Peter (1990) Himmler New York, Henry Holt. See under Rosenberg in index
- ISBN 0-19-822887-2.
- ^ Padfield, Peter, Himmler: Reichsführer-SS (Macmillan, 1990), p. 317
- ISBN 0-15-602754-2.
- ^ Förster 1998, p. 489.
- ^ ISBN 0-521-35120-0.
- ^ a b (German) Reinhard Kühnl (1978). Der deutsche Faschismus in Quellen und Dokumenten, 3rd Edition, p. 328. Einige Gedanken über die Behandlung der Fremdvölkischen im Osten. Köln.
- ^ Dallin, Alexander (1981). German rule in Russia, 1941–1945: a study of occupation policies. Westview. p. 185.
- ^ ISBN 0-19-161989-2
- ^ ISBN 0-19-820873-1.
- ^ a b c d e f Kroener et al. (2003), p. 251
- ^ Kroener et al. (2003), p. 252
- ^ Kersten, Felix (1956). The Kersten memoirs, 1940–1945, London. London: Hutchinson and Co. Ltd. pp. 184–185. Retrieved 19 March 2024.
- ^ Stanley G. Payne, Franco and Hitler: Spain, Germany, and World War II
- ^ a b c Preston, Paul "Franco and Hitler: The Myth of Hendaye 1940" pp. 1–16 from Contemporary European History, Volume 1, Issue # 1, March 1992 p. 5.
- ^ Weinberg, Gerhard A World In Arms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005 p. 177.
- ^ Norman Rich, Hitler's War Aims: Ideology, the Nazi State and the Course of Expansion
- ^ Glyn Stone, The Oldest Ally: Britain and the Portuguese Connection, 1936–1941: Britain and the Portuguese Connection, 1936–41 (Royal Historical Society Studies in History)
- ^ "Maitland – Sara –?Hallinan collection". wdc.contentdm.oclc.org. Retrieved 17 May 2023.
- ^ Fest 1973, p. 210.
- ^ a b c Stegemann & Vogel 1995, p. 211.
- ^ Gerhard L. Weinberg, Visions of Victory: The Hopes of Eight World War II Leaders
- ^ Patrick Allitt. Catholic Converts: British and American Intellectuals Turn to Rome. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, 1997. p. 228.
- ^ Nicholas Atkin, Michael Biddiss, Frank Tallett. The Wiley-Blackwell Dictionary of Modern European History Since 1789. John Wiley & Sons, 2011. p. 155.
- ^ John Lukacs. The Last European War: September 1939 – December 1941. p. 364.
- ^ a b Weinberg 2005, p. 14.
- ^ a b Rich (1974), pp. 500–501.
- ^ Padfield (1990), p. 309
- ^ Stegemann & Vogel 1995, p. 295.
- ^ a b Weinberg 2005, p. 13.
- ^ ISBN 1-84545-047-7.
- ^ a b c Martin (2006), p. 271.
- ^ Weinberg (2005), p. 13
- ^ a b Rich (1974), p. 415
- ^ People Against Nazism, Communism, and Authoritarianism. Nazi plans for Australia. Retrieved 2 January 2011. [6]
- ^ a b "Hitler branded us as apes – New Zealand News". NZ Herald. Retrieved 17 January 2023.
- ^ Weinberg (2005), pp. 15–16.
- ISBN 0-15-602754-2.
- ^ a b Stegemann & Vogel 1995, p. 625.
- ^ a b Stegemann & Vogel 1995, p. 631.
- ^ ISBN 1-55876-298-1.
- ^ a b Weinberg (2005), p. 19
- ^ Stegemann & Vogel 1995, p. 178.
- ^ a b c Rich (1974), p. 402.
- ^ Hitler (2000), p. 208.
- ^ Rich (1974), p. 383.
- ^ Les plans secrets de la Seconde Guerre mondiale, lignes 16 et 17, p. 96
- ^ Forgotten Legion: Sonderverbande Bergmann in World War II, 1941–1945 by Armin Abramian
- ^ Freiwillige vom Kaukasus. A. Jeloschek, F. Richter, E. Schutte, J. Semler, L. S. Verlag, Graz-Stuttgart, 2003.
- ^ Auron, Yair. The Banality Of Denial: Israel And The Armenian Genocide. Transaction Publishers: 2004: p. 263
- ^ a b Hiro, Dilip. Iran under the ayatollahs. Routledge & Kegan Paul Inc., p. 296. [7]
- ^ Iran's etymology.
- ^ Alireza Asgharzadeh. Iran and the Challenge of Diversity: Islamic Fundamentalism, Aryanist Racism, and Democratic Struggles. pp. 91–94.
The Nazis found a favorable climate amongst the Iranian elite to spread fascistic and racist propaganda. The Nazi propaganda machine advocated the (supposedly) common Aryan ancestry of "the two Nations." In order to further cultivate racist tendencies, in 1936 the Reich Cabinet issued a special decree exempting Iranians from the restrictions of the Nuremberg Racial Laws on the grounds that they were 'pure-blooded' Aryans ... In various pro-Nazi publications, lectures, speeches, and ceremonies, parallels were drawn among Reza Shah, Hitler, and Mussolini to emphasize the charismatic resemblance among these leaders.
- ^ Lenczowski. 1944, p. 161
- ^ "Iran in the Nazi New Order, 1933–1941". Sharmin and Bijan Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Iran and Persian Gulf Studies. Retrieved 16 May 2023.
- ^ "Iran in the Nazi New Order, 1934–1941 | Association for Iranian Studies (AIS) | انجمن ایران پژوهی". associationforiranianstudies.org. Retrieved 16 May 2023.
- ^ Lenczowski. 1944, pág. 161
- ^ a b Stegemann & Vogel 1995, p. 162.
- ^ a b Stegemann & Vogel 1995, p. 163.
- ^ a b Stegemann & Vogel 1995, p. 164.
- ^ Stegemann & Vogel 1995, p. 165.
- ^ Stegemann & Vogel 1995, p. 591.
- ^ a b Hitler's Last Will and Political Testament, 17 February 1945
- ^ "Hajj Amin al-Husayni: Wartime Propagandist". Holocaust Encyclopedia. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.
- S2CID 152671129.
- ^ "Blitzkrieg to Defeat: Hitler's War Directives, 1939–1945" edited with an Introduction and Commentary by H. R. Trevor-Roper (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1964), pp. 80–81.
- ^ ISBN 0-8147-3111-2.
- ^ a b c d e f g Ghose, Sankar (1992). Jawaharlal Nehru, A Biography, pp. 138–139. Allied Publishers Limited.
- ISBN 143913233X.
- ^ ISBN 3-89930-064-5.
- ^ Stegemann & Vogel 1995, p. 607.
- ^ Stegemann & Vogel 1995, p. 608.
- ^ Goodrick-Clarke (2000), p. 85.
- ^ ISBN 0-7864-1265-8.
- ISBN 9780962832451.
- ^ Weinberg (2005), p. 13.
- ^ Rich 1972, pp. 237–246.
- ^ "Hitler on Americas", Life, 9 June 1941
- ^ "American Bund: The Failure of American Nazism: The German-American Bund's Attempt to Create an American "Fifth Column"". Archived from the original on 25 May 2018. Retrieved 1 March 2011.
- ISBN 1-57441-065-2.
- ^ "American Indian Federation" at the Encyclopedia of Oklahoma History & Culture Archived October 18, 2010, at the Wayback Machine
- ISBN 9780806131849.
- ISBN 9780803205840.)
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link - ^ Jere Bishop Franco's Crossing the Pond: The Native American Effort in World War II. (1999).
- ^ Grafton, Anthony, "Mein Buch", The New Republic, December 2008
- ^ Kenneth Townsend. World War II and the American Indian. University of New Mexico Press, 2002.
- ^ Himmler, Heinrich (1944). Amerikanismus eine Weltgefahr (in German). SS Hauptamt.
- ^ "Nazi Germany's Race Laws, the United States, and American Indians".
- ^ Berger, Knute. "The strange case of the Northwest's Native American Nazi | Crosscut". crosscut.com. Retrieved 14 May 2023.
- ^ Speech by FDR to the White House Correspondents' Association on U.S. involvement in the war in Europe [8]
- ^ Hitler (2000) p. 188
- ^ Hitler (2000) p. 282
- ISBN 0-275-96684-4.
- ^ ISBN 0-87451-216-6.
- ^ Stegemann & Vogel 1995, p. 211.
- ^ ISBN 0-520-02528-8.
- ^ Duffy (2004), p. 17
- ISBN 978-1-59228-934-9.
- ^ Stegemann & Vogel 1995, p. 632.
- ^ Hitler (2000) p. 14
- ^ Hitler (2000) p. 26
- ^ Stoakes, Geoffrey (1986). Hitler and the Quest for World Dominion. Berg, pp. 221–222. [9]
- ^ Weinberg 2005, p. 15.
- ^ Frank Capra (1943). Why We Fight – The Nazis Strike (YouTube). Public Domain Free Movies. Event occurs at 3:15 to 6:58. Archived from the original (YouTube) on 30 June 2014. Retrieved 7 April 2014.
- ^ Stoakes, p. 235.
- ^ Hillgruber, Andreas. Germany and the Two World Wars, Harvard University Press: Cambridge, 1981; pp. 50–51
- ^ a b c d e Wagner, Jonathan Frederick (1981). Brothers beyond the sea: national socialism in Canada, pp. 23–24. Wilfrid Laurier University Press, Waterloo, Ontario.
- ^ Frye, Alton (1967). Nazi Germany and the American Hemisphere, p. 183. Yale University Press.
- ^ Wagner (1981), p. 25.
- ^ Wagner (1981), p. 26.
- ISBN 0-415-17423-6.
- ^ Leitz (2004), p. 115
- ^ Leitz (2004), pp. 118–119
- ISBN 0-521-82246-7.
- ^ Historia de las Relaciones Exteriores Argentinas. Las actividades del nazismo en la Argentina. http://www.argentina-rree.com/9/9-027.htm Archived 2020-10-01 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 03/09/2013 (Spanish)
- ISBN 0-521-61826-6.
- ^ Rich (1974), p. 329.
- ^ Friedman (2003), p. 46
- ISBN 0-19-508566-3.
- ^ "Imperial German Territorial Aspirations – Latin America".
- ^ Rich, Norman (1973). Hitler's War Aims: Ideology, the Nazi State, and the Course of Expansion, 224. W. W. Norton & Company, New York.
- ^ Weinberg (2005), p. 10.
- ^ Echternkamp, Jörg. ed. Germany and the Second World War Volume IX/I: German Wartime Society 1939–1945: Politicization, Disintegration, and the Struggle for Survival (2008). p. 331
- ^ Stegemann & Vogel 1995, p. 636.
- ^ ISBN 0-300-10098-1, p. 455
- ^ a b Rich (1974), p. 415.
- ^ Archived 24 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Himmler Speech at Kharkow, April 1943". Archived from the original on 24 March 2012. Retrieved 22 August 2011.
- ^ a b Weinberg 2005, p. 35.
- ^ a b Weinberg 2005, p. 37.
- Joachim C. Fest(2005). Inside Hitler's Bunker: The Last Days of the Third Reich. Margot Bettauer Dembo.
References
- Stegemann, Bernd; Vogel, Detlef (1995). Germany and the Second World War: The Mediterranean, South-East Europe, and North Africa, 1939–1941. ISBN 0-19-822884-8.
Further reading
- Evans, Richard J. The Third Reich at War (2009) pp 321–402
- Förster, Jürgen (1998). "Operation Barbarossa as a War of Conquest and Annihilation". In Boog, Horst; ISBN 0-19-822886-4.
- Fritz, Stephen G. Ostkrieg: Hitler's War of Extermination in the East (2011)
- Longerich, Peter. Heinrich Himmler: A Life (2012)
- Lund, Joachim. "Denmark and the 'European New Order', 1940–1942," Contemporary European History, (2004) 13#3 pp 305–321,
- Mazower, Mark. Hitler's Empire: How the Nazis Ruled Europe (2009)
- Mazower, Mark. "Hitler's New Order, 1939–45," Diplomacy and Statecraft (1996) 3#1 pp 29–53,
- Snyder, Timothy. Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin (2010)