Palingenetic ultranationalism

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Palingenetic ultranationalism is a

myth of fascism, namely that of the need for a social revolution to occur first before a "national rebirth", palingenesis, could then take place.[1][2]

Griffin argues that the unique synthesis of palingenesis, populism and

nationalist ideologies.[1][2] He asserts that this is the "fascist minimum" without which, according to his definition, there can be no "true fascism".[1][2] Griffin himself describes fascism as a political philosophy built on the "perverse mythic logic" of destruction, which the fascist believes will then be followed by some form of political rebirth.[1]

History

The idea was first put forth in the 1991 book The Nature of Fascism[1] and was expanded in the paper "Staging the Nation's Rebirth: The Politics and Aesthetics of Performance in the Context of Fascist Studies" in the 1994 volume Fascism and Theatre: The Politics and Aesthetics in the Era of Fascism.[2] Griffin's theory of "true fascism" is a recent philosophical development and is not explicitly stated in earlier political treatises on fascism, such as in Mussolinni's "Doctrine of Fascism", and others. While earlier works do describe the idea of fascism as being "revolutionary", they do not list a "revolution" as being a necessary precursor to fascism.[3][4]

golden age in the country's history so that the past can be a guidebook to a better tomorrow, with an associated regime that superficially resembles a reactionary one.[1][2]
Fascism distinguishes itself by being the only ideology that focuses strongly on the revolution in its myth or, as Griffin puts it:

the mythical horizons of the fascist mentality do not extend beyond this first stage. It promises to replace gerontocracy, mediocrity and national weakness with youth, heroism and national greatness, to banish anarchy and decadence and bring order and health, to inaugurate an exciting new world in place of the played-out one that existed before, to put government in the hands of outstanding personalities instead of non-entities.

Through all of that, there would be one great leader who would battle the representatives of the old system with

mass of people will supposedly appear who have only one goal: to create their new future.[1][2] Such a fascist movement would ideally have infinite faith in its mythical hero who would stand for everything the movement believes in.[1][2] According to this utopian ideology, under the guidance of their leader the country would then rise like a phoenix from the ashes of corruption and decadence.[1][2]

Contemporary examples

National-anarchism has been argued to be a syncretic political ideology that was developed in the 1990s by former Third Positionists to promote a "stateless palingenetic ultranationalism".[5]

See also

References

  1. ^ .
  2. ^ . Retrieved 7 October 2013 – via Library of Social Science.
  3. ^ “The Doctrine of Fascism” (1932) by Benito Mussolini.
  4. ^ "The Ethics of Fascism" (1935) by T.V. Smith
  5. ^ Sunshine, Spencer (Winter 2008). "Rebranding Fascism: National-Anarchists". Public Eye. Retrieved 12 November 2009.

External links