Isotopes of darmstadtium
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
List of isotopes
Nuclide [n 1] |
Z | N | Isotopic mass (Da) [n 2][n 3] |
Half-life |
Daughter isotope |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Excitation energy | |||||||||||||||||||
267Ds[n 7] | 110 | 157 | 267.14377(15)# | 10(8) µs [2.8+13.0 −1.3 μs] |
α ? | 263Hs ? | 3/2+# | ||||||||||||
269Ds | 110 | 159 | 269.14475(3) | 230(110) µs [170+160 −60 μs] |
α | 265Hs | 3/2+# | ||||||||||||
270Ds[2] | 110 | 160 | 270.14458(5) | 200+70 −40 μs |
α | 266Hs | 0+ | ||||||||||||
270mDs | 1040 keV | 3.9+1.3 −0.8 ms |
α (70%)[3] | 266Hs | 10-# | ||||||||||||||
IT (30%)
|
270Ds | ||||||||||||||||||
271Ds | 110 | 161 | 271.14595(10)# | 210(170) ms | α | 267Hs | 11/2−# | ||||||||||||
271mDs | 29(29) keV | 1.3(5) ms | α | 267Hs | 9/2+# | ||||||||||||||
273Ds | 110 | 163 | 273.14856(14)# | 240(100) µs | α | 269Hs | 13/2−# | ||||||||||||
275Ds[4] | 110 | 165 | 275.15203(45)# | 62 µs | α | 271Hs | |||||||||||||
276Ds[5] | 110 | 166 | 276.15303(59)# | 150+100 −40 μs |
SF (57%) | (various) | 0+ | ||||||||||||
α (43%) | 272Hs | ||||||||||||||||||
277Ds[n 8] | 110 | 167 | 277.15591(41)# | 3.5+2.1 −0.9 ms[6] |
α | 273Hs | 11/2+# | ||||||||||||
279Ds[n 9] | 110 | 169 | 279.16010(64)# | 186+21 −17 ms[7] |
SF (87%)[7] | (various) | |||||||||||||
α (13%) | 275Hs | ||||||||||||||||||
280Ds[n 10] | 110 | 170 | 280.16131(89)# | 360+172 −16 μs[8][9][10] |
SF | (various) | 0+ | ||||||||||||
281Ds[n 11] | 110 | 171 | 281.16451(59)# | 14(3) s | SF (90%) | (various) | 3/2+# | ||||||||||||
α (10%) | 277Hs | ||||||||||||||||||
This table header & footer: |
- ^ mDs – Excited nuclear isomer.
- ^ ( ) – Uncertainty (1σ) is given in concise form in parentheses after the corresponding last digits.
- ^ # – Atomic mass marked #: value and uncertainty derived not from purely experimental data, but at least partly from trends from the Mass Surface (TMS).
- ^
Modes of decay:
SF: Spontaneous fission - ^ ( ) spin value – Indicates spin with weak assignment arguments.
- ^ # – Values marked # are not purely derived from experimental data, but at least partly from trends of neighboring nuclides (TNN).
- ^ Unconfirmed isotope
- ^ Not directly synthesized, occurs in decay chain of 285Fl
- ^ Not directly synthesized, occurs as decay product of 283Cn
- ^ Not directly synthesized, occurs in decay chain of 288Fl
- ^ Not directly synthesized, occurs in decay chain of 289Fl
Isotopes and nuclear properties
Nucleosynthesis
Depending on the energies involved, the former are separated into "hot" and "cold". In hot fusion reactions, very light, high-energy projectiles are accelerated toward very heavy targets (actinides), giving rise to compound nuclei at high excitation energy (~40–50 MeV) that may either fission or evaporate several (3 to 5) neutrons.[12] In cold fusion reactions, the produced fused nuclei have a relatively low excitation energy (~10–20 MeV), which decreases the probability that these products will undergo fission reactions. As the fused nuclei cool to the ground state, they require emission of only one or two neutrons, and thus, allows for the generation of more neutron-rich products.[11] The latter is a distinct concept from that of where nuclear fusion claimed to be achieved at room temperature conditions (see cold fusion).[13]
The table below contains various combinations of targets and projectiles which could be used to form compound nuclei with Z = 110.
Target | Projectile | CN | Attempt result |
---|---|---|---|
208Pb | 62Ni | 270Ds | Successful reaction |
207Pb | 64Ni | 271Ds | Successful reaction |
208Pb | 64Ni | 272Ds | Successful reaction |
209Bi | 59Co | 268Ds | Successful reaction |
226Ra | 50Ti | 276Ds | Planned reaction[14] |
232Th | 44Ca | 276Ds | Failure to date |
232Th | 48Ca | 280Ds | Successful reaction |
233U | 40Ar | 273Ds | Failure to date[15] |
235U | 40Ar | 275Ds | Failure to date[15] |
238U | 40Ar | 278Ds | Failure to date[15] |
244Pu | 34S | 278Ds | Successful reaction |
244Pu | 36S | 280Ds | Reaction yet to be attempted |
248Cm | 30Si | 278Ds | Reaction yet to be attempted |
250Cm | 30Si | 280Ds | Reaction yet to be attempted |
Cold fusion
Before the first successful synthesis of darmstadtium in 1994 by the
In addition to the official discovery reactions, in October–November 2000, the team at GSI also studied the analogous reaction using a lead-207 target in order to synthesize the new isotope 270Ds. They succeeded in synthesising eight atoms of 270Ds, relating to a ground state isomer, 270Ds, and a high-
In 1986, a team at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR) in Dubna, Russia, studied the reaction:
- 209
83Bi + 59
27Co → 267
110Ds + 1
0n
They were unable to detect any darmstadtium atoms. In 1995, the team at LBNL reported that they had succeeded in detecting a single atom of 267Ds using this reaction. However, several decays were not measured and further research is required to confirm this discovery.[23]
Hot fusion
In the late 1980s, the GSI team attempted to synthesize element 110 by bombarding a target consisting of various uranium isotopes—233U, 235U, and 238U—with accelerated argon-40 ions. No atoms were detected;[24] a limiting cross section of 21 pb was reported.[15]
In September 1994, the team at Dubna detected a single atom of 273Ds by bombarding a plutonium-244 target with accelerated sulfur-34 ions.[25]
Experiments were done in 2004 at the Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions (FLNR) in Dubna studying the fission characteristics of the compound nucleus 280Ds, produced in the reaction:
- 232
90Th + 48
20Ca → 280
110Ds* → fission
The result revealed how compound nuclei such as this fission predominantly by expelling
The 232Th+48Ca reaction was attempted again at the FLNR in 2022; it was predicted that the 48Ca-induced reaction leading to element 110 would have a lower yield than those leading to lighter or heavier elements. Seven atoms of 276Ds were reported, with lifetimes ranging between 9.3 μs and 983.1 μs; four decayed by spontaneous fission and three decayed via a two-alpha sequence to 272Hs and the spontaneously fissioning 268Sg.[5] The maximum reported cross section for the production of 276Ds was about 0.7 pb and a sensitivity limit an order of magnitude lower was reached. This reported cross section is lower than that of all reactions using 48Ca as a projectile, with the exception of 249Cf + 48Ca, and it further supports the existence of magic numbers at Z = 108, N = 162 and Z = 114, N = 184.[5] In 2023, the JINR team repeated this reaction at a higher beam energy and also found 275Ds.[4] They intend to further study the reaction to search for 274Ds.[4]
As decay product
Evaporation residue | Observed darmstadtium isotope |
---|---|
277Cn | 273Ds[29] |
285Fl, 281Cn | 277Ds[30] |
291Lv, 287Fl, 283Cn | 279Ds[31] |
288Fl, 284Cn | 280Ds |
288Mc, 284Nh, 280Rg ? | 280Ds ? |
293Lv, 289Fl, 285Cn | 281Ds[32] |
Darmstadtium has been observed as a decay product of copernicium. Copernicium currently has seven known isotopes, four of which have been shown to alpha decay into darmstadtium, with mass numbers 273, 277, and 279–281. To date, all of these bar 273Ds have only been produced by decay of copernicium. Parent copernicium nuclei can be themselves decay products of flerovium or livermorium. Darmstadtium may also have been produced in the electron capture decay of roentgenium nuclei which are themselves daughters of nihonium and moscovium.[28] For example, in 2004, the Dubna team (JINR) identified darmstadtium-281 as a product in the decay of livermorium via an alpha decay sequence:[32]
- 293
116Lv
→ 289
114Fl
+ 4
2He - 289
114Fl
→ 285
112Cn
+ 4
2He - 285
112Cn
→ 281
110Ds
+ 4
2He
Retracted isotopes
- 280Ds
The first synthesis of element 114 resulted in two atoms assigned to 288Fl, decaying to the 280Ds, which underwent spontaneous fission. The assignment was later changed to 289Fl and the darmstadtium isotope to 281Ds. Hence, 280Ds remained unknown until 2016, when it was populated by the hitherto unknown alpha decay of 284Cn (previously, that nucleus was only known to undergo spontaneous fission). The discovery of 280Ds in this decay chain was confirmed in 2021; it undergoes spontaneous fission with a half-life of 360 µs.[8]
- 277Ds
In the claimed synthesis of 293Og in 1999, the isotope 277Ds was identified as decaying by 10.18 MeV alpha emission with a half-life of 3.0 ms. This claim was retracted in 2001. This isotope was finally created in 2010 and its decay data supported the fabrication of previous data.[33]
- 273mDs
In the synthesis of 277Cn in 1996 by GSI (see copernicium), one decay chain proceeded via 273Ds, which decayed by emission of a 9.73 MeV alpha particle with a lifetime of 170 ms. This would have been assigned to an isomeric level. This data could not be confirmed and thus this isotope is currently unknown or unconfirmed.
- 272Ds
In the first attempt to synthesize darmstadtium, a 10 ms SF activity was assigned to 272Ds in the reaction 232Th(44Ca,4n).[15] Given current understanding regarding stability, this isotope has been retracted from the table of isotopes.
Nuclear isomerism
- 281Ds
The production of 281Ds by the decay of 289Fl or 293Lv has produced two very different decay modes. The most common and readily confirmed mode is spontaneous fission with a half-life of 11 s. A much rarer and as yet unconfirmed mode is alpha decay by emission of an alpha particle with energy 8.77 MeV with an observed half-life of around 3.7 min. This decay is associated with a unique decay pathway from the parent nuclides and must be assigned to an isomeric level. The half-life suggests that it must be assigned to an isomeric state but further research is required to confirm these reports.[32] It was suggested in 2016 that this unknown activity might be due to 282Mt, the great-granddaughter of 290Fl via electron capture and two consecutive alpha decays.[34]
- 271Ds
Decay data from the direct synthesis of 271Ds clearly indicates the presence of two nuclear isomers. The first emits alpha particles with energies 10.74 and 10.69 MeV and has a half-life of 1.63 ms. The other only emits alpha particles with an energy of 10.71 MeV and has a half-life of 69 ms. The first has been assigned to the ground state and the latter to an isomeric level. It has been suggested that the closeness of the alpha decay energies indicates that the isomeric level may decay primarily by delayed
- 270Ds
The direct production of 270Ds has clearly identified two nuclear isomers. The ground state decays by alpha emission into the ground state of 266Hs by emitting an alpha particle with energy 11.03 MeV and has a half-life of 0.10 ms. The metastable state decays by alpha emission, emitting alpha particles with energies of 12.15, 11.15, and 10.95 MeV, and has a half-life of 6 ms. When the metastable state emits an alpha particle of energy 12.15 MeV, it decays into the ground state of 266Hs, indicating that it has 1.12 MeV of excess energy.[22]
Chemical yields of isotopes
Cold fusion
The table below provides cross-sections and excitation energies for cold fusion reactions producing darmstadtium isotopes directly. Data in bold represent maxima derived from excitation function measurements. + represents an observed exit channel.
Projectile | Target | CN | 1n | 2n | 3n |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
62Ni | 208Pb | 270Ds | 3.5 pb | ||
64Ni | 208Pb | 272Ds | 15 pb, 9.9 MeV |
Fission of compound nuclei with Z = 110
Experiments have been performed in 2004 at the Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions in Dubna studying the fission characteristics of the compound nucleus 280Ds. The nuclear reaction used is 232Th+48Ca. The result revealed how nuclei such as this fission predominantly by expelling closed shell nuclei such as 132Sn (Z = 50, N = 82).[36]
Theoretical calculations
Decay characteristics
Theoretical calculation in a quantum tunneling model reproduces the experimental alpha decay half-live data.[37][38] It also predicts that the isotope 294Ds would have alpha decay half-life of the order of 311 years.[39][40]
Evaporation residue cross sections
The below table contains various targets-projectile combinations for which calculations have provided estimates for cross section yields from various neutron evaporation channels. The channel with the highest expected yield is given.
DNS = Di-nuclear system; σ = cross section
Target | Projectile | CN | Channel (product) | σmax | Model | Ref |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
208Pb | 64Ni | 272Ds | 1n (271Ds) | 10 pb | DNS | [41] |
232Th | 48Ca | 280Ds | 4n (276Ds) | 0.2 pb | DNS | [42] |
230Th | 48Ca | 278Ds | 4n (274Ds) | 1 pb | DNS | [42] |
238U | 40Ar | 278Ds | 4n (274Ds) | 2 pb | DNS | [42] |
244Pu | 36S | 280Ds | 4n (276Ds) | 0.61 pb | DNS | [43] |
248Cm | 30Si | 278Ds | 4n (274Ds) | 65.32 pb | DNS | [43] |
250Cm | 30Si | 280Ds | 4n (276Ds) | 3.54 pb | DNS | [43] |
References
- .
- . Retrieved 1 July 2023.
- S2CID 233794940.
- ^ a b c "New darmstadtium isotope discovered at Superheavy Element Factory". Joint Institute for Nuclear Research. 27 February 2023. Retrieved 29 March 2023.
- ^ S2CID 261170871.
- .
- ^ S2CID 251759318.
- ^ PMID 33543956.
- S2CID 55598355.
- .
- ^ a b Armbruster, Peter & Munzenberg, Gottfried (1989). "Creating superheavy elements". Scientific American. 34: 36–42.
- .
- .
- ^ http://www1.jinr.ru/Reports/2008/english/06_flnr_e.pdf [bare URL PDF]
- ^ S2CID 101394312.
- ^ S2CID 125020220.
- .
- ^ Ginter, T. N.; Gregorich, K.; Loveland, W.; Lee, D.; Kirbach, U.; Sudowe, R.; Folden, C.; Patin, J.; Seward, N. (8 December 2002). "Confirmation of production of element 110 by the 208Pb(64Ni,n) reaction". LBNL repositories. Retrieved 2008-03-02. (preprint)
- PMID 15601003.
- S2CID 123077512.
- ^ George Johnson (15 October 2002). "At Lawrence Berkeley, Physicists Say a Colleague Took Them for a Ride". The New York Times.
- ^ S2CID 124240926.
- PMID 9970386.
- ISBN 0-415-28496-1.
- PMID 9971385.
- ^ Flerov lab annual report 2004
- ISBN 978-0-19-960563-7.
- ^ a b Sonzogni, Alejandro. "Interactive Chart of Nuclides". National Nuclear Data Center: Brookhaven National Laboratory. Archived from the original on 2017-07-14. Retrieved 2008-06-06.
- ^
Hofmann, S.; Ninov, V.; Heßberger, F. P.; Armbruster, P.; Folger, H.; Münzenberg, G.; Schött, H. J.; Popeko, A. G.; Yeremin, A. V.; Saro, S.; Janik, R.; Leino, M. (1996). "The new element 112". S2CID 119975957.
- ^
Public Affairs Department (26 October 2010). "Six New Isotopes of the Superheavy Elements Discovered: Moving Closer to Understanding the Island of Stability". Berkeley Lab. Retrieved 2011-04-25.
- ^
Yeremin, A. V.; et al. (1999). "Synthesis of nuclei of the superheavy element 114 in reactions induced by 48Ca". S2CID 4399615.
- ^ a b c Oganessian, Y. T.; Utyonkov, V.; Lobanov, Y.; Abdullin, F.; Polyakov, A.; Shirokovsky, I.; Tsyganov, Y.; Gulbekian, G.; Bogomolov, S.; Gikal, B.; et al. (2004). "Measurements of cross sections for the fusion-evaporation reactions 244Pu(48Ca,xn)292−x114 and 245Cm(48Ca,xn)293−x116". Physical Review C. 69 (5): 054607. .
- ^ see Oganesson
- S2CID 254113387.
- S2CID 250756383.
- ^ see Flerov lab annual report 2004
- S2CID 118739116.
- S2CID 7496348.
- S2CID 119207807.
- S2CID 96718440.
- S2CID 711489.
- ^ S2CID 18647291.
- ^ S2CID 118733755.
- Isotope masses from:
- M. Wang; G. Audi; A. H. Wapstra; F. G. Kondev; M. MacCormick; X. Xu; et al. (2012). "The AME2012 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references" (PDF). Chinese Physics C. 36 (12): 1603–2014. .
- Audi, Georges; Bersillon, Olivier; Blachot, Jean;
- Half-life, spin, and isomer data selected from the following sources.
- Audi, Georges; Bersillon, Olivier; Blachot, Jean;
- National Nuclear Data Center. "NuDat 2.x database". Brookhaven National Laboratory.
- Holden, Norman E. (2004). "11. Table of the Isotopes". In Lide, David R. (ed.). ISBN 978-0-8493-0485-9.