Equality before the law

Part of a series on |
Liberalism |
---|
![]() |
Equality before the law, also known as equality under the law, equality in the eyes of the law, legal equality, or legal egalitarianism, is the principle that all people must be equally protected by the law.
Article 7 of the
History

The legalist philosopher Guan Zhong (720–645 BC) declared that "the monarch and his subjects no matter how great and small they are complying with the law will be the great order".[7]
The 431 BC
If we look to the laws, they afford equal justice to all in their private differences; if to social standing, advancement in public life falls to reputation for capacity, class considerations not being allowed to interfere with merit; nor again does poverty bar the way.[8]
The Bible says that "You and the foreigner shall be the same before the Lord: The same laws and regulations will apply both to you and to the foreigner residing among you." (Numbers 15:15f)
The US state of
The fifth demand of the South African Freedom Charter, adopted in 1955, is "All Shall Be Equal Before The Law!"[12]
Article 200 of the
Liberalism
In his
In 1774, Alexander Hamilton wrote: "All men have one common original, they participate in one common nature, and consequently have one common right. No reason can be assigned why one man should exercise any power over his fellow creatures more than another, unless they voluntarily vest him with it".[15]
In Social Statics, Herbert Spencer defined it as a natural law "that every man may claim the fullest liberty to exercise his faculties compatible with the possession of like liberty to every other man". Stated another way by Spencer, "each has freedom to do all that he wills provided that he infringes not the equal freedom of any other".[16]
Feminism
Equality before the law is a tenet of some branches of feminism. In the 19th century, gender equality before the law was a radical goal, but some later feminist views hold that formal legal equality is not enough to create actual and social equality between women and men. An ideal of formal equality may penalize women for failing to conform to a male norm while an ideal of different treatment may reinforce sexist stereotypes.[17]
In Reed v. Reed, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg highlighted the evolving the nature of the phrase, "We, the People" in the U.S Constitution emphasizing how it has become more inclusive over time. She discussed the progression of women's roles in society, noting that women were fully recognized as citizens and gained the right to vote, which allowed them to be treated equally under the Fourteenth Amendment. Ginsburg's comments focus on the historical and legal advancements regarding gender equality without promoting a specific ideological stance. [18]
In 1988, prior to serving as a Justice of the Supreme Court, Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote: "Generalizations about the way women or men are – my life experience bears out – cannot guide me reliably in making decisions about particular individuals. At least in the law, I have found no natural superiority or deficiency in either sex. In class or in grading papers from 1963 to 1980, and now in reading briefs and listening to arguments in court for over seventeen years, I have detected no reliable indicator or distinctly male or surely female thinking – even penmanship".[19] In an American Civil Liberties Union's Women's Rights Project in the 1970s,[20] Ginsburg challenged in Frontiero v. Richardson the laws that gave health service benefits to wives of servicemen, but not to husbands of servicewomen.[21] There are over 150 national constitutions that currently mention equality regardless of gender.[22]
See also
- Anti-discrimination law
- Civil and political rights
- Equal justice under law
- Equality of opportunity
- Global justice
- Isonomia
- Law of equal liberty
- Meritocracy
- Political egalitarianism
- Prerogative, the inverse of equality before the law
- Rule according to higher law
- Rule of law
- Selective enforcement
- Social equality
- List of civil rights leaders
- List of suffragists and suffragettes
- List of women's rights activists
- Völkisch equality
References
- ^ a b "Universal Declaration of Human Rights". United Nations. Retrieved 31 March 2018.
- ^ ISBN 0-691-09993-6).
- ^ ISBN 1-57958-339-3).
- ^ "Read about "Equality" on Constitute". constituteproject.org. Retrieved 31 March 2018.
- ^ "Read about "Equality regardless of race" on Constitute". constituteproject.org. Retrieved 31 March 2018.
- ^ "Read about "Equality regardless of nationality" on Constitute". constituteproject.org. Retrieved 31 March 2018.
- ^ Xia Zhang:Further Discussion on the Spirit of Rule of Law Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 233. 3rd International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2018).
- ^ Thucydides, The History of the Peloponnesian War, Written 431 BCE, Translated by Richard Crawley (1874), retrieved via Project Gutenberg.
- ^ Nebraska State Motto 50 State Guide, eReferenceDesk.
- ^ Potter, James E. (2010). ""Equality Before the Law": Thoughts on the Origin of Nebraska's State Motto" (PDF). Nebraska History. No. 91. pp. 116–121. Retrieved June 1, 2021.
- ^ Kindschuh, Hilary (April 11, 2002). "Human chain circles Capitol in support of gay community". The Daily Nebraskan. Lincoln, Nebraska. Retrieved June 1, 2021.
- ^ Congress of the People (June 26, 1955). "The Freedom Charter". Walter Sisulu Square. Kliptown. Retrieved June 8, 2021.
- ^ Dean, Meryll (2002). Japanese legal system. Routledge via Google Books. p. 535
- Second Treatise of Government. Chapter 2.
- ^ Alexander Hamilton (15 December 1774). "A Full Vindication of the Measures of the Congress". National Archives of Founders Online. Harold C. Syrett, ed. (1961). The Papers of Alexander Hamilton. 1 (1768–1778). New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 45–78.
- ^ Herbert Spencer. Social Statics. c. 4, § 3.
- ^ Jaggar, Alison. (1994) "Part One: Equality. Introduction." In Living with Contradictions: Controversies in Feminist Social Ethics[permanent dead link ]. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
- ^ American University of Gender, Social Policy, and the Law (2012). "Reed v. Reed at 40: Equal Protection and Women's Rights". Retrieved 2024-09-14.
{{cite web}}
:|last=
has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Jeff Rosen, "The Book of Ruth", New Republic, August 2, 1993, p. 19.
- ^ "Redirecting..." heinonline.org. Retrieved 2024-09-10.
{{cite web}}
: Cite uses generic title (help) - ^ O'Dea, Suzanne. From Suffrage to the Senate: An Encyclopedia of American Women in Politics, ABC-CLIO, 1999
- ^ "Read about "Equality regardless of gender" on Constitute". constituteproject.org. Retrieved 31 March 2018.
Further reading
- Hudson, Adelbert Lathrop (1913). "Equality Before the Law". The Atlantic Monthly. Vol. CXII. pp. 679–688.
- Shenfield, Arthur A. (1973). "Equality Before the Law". Modern Age. Vol. XVII. No. 2, pp. 114–124.