Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive481

Page: Snowdonia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 89.242.251.72 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [1]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [2] (first attempt not technically a revert)
2. [3]
3. [4]
4. [5] (arguably different and not a revert, but all related and it was under discussion and against consensus)
5. [6]
6. [7]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [8] (Clearly seen as it was deleted prior to last revert [9])

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [10]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A89.242.251.72&diff=1217858623&oldid=1217856383

Comments:
Please note that DankJae inadvertantly exceeded 3RR too but immediately self reverted on realising. Therefore there was no violation by that user. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:44, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

• Page protected for 3 days. Aoidh (talk) 09:23, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Reporting for vandalism and spam 154.121.81.65 (talk) 20:56, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Vandalism is reported to

WP:AIV. 331dot (talk

) 21:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Declined – malformed report. Please use the "Click here to create a new report" link at the top of this page, which gives a template report, and provide complete

diffs. – EdJohnston (talk

) 21:16, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: North India (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Katkar123596 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [11]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [12]
2. [13]
3. [14]
4. [15]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [16]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [17]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [18]

Comments:

Blocked – for a period of 24 hoursRegentsPark (comment) 17:17, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Abu al-Abbas al-Nabati (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 91.186.228.246 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 16:17, 9 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1218080302 by R Prazeres (talk)Read carefully the sources in the article. His mother is Roman, not him"
2. 15:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1218078480 by R Prazeres (talk)I have clarified the matter by describing the amendments here more than once, so the problem is with you now because you do not want to see the sources"
3. 12:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1218052635 by Neuropol (talk)Please see the edits and sources before acting in this way"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 16:01, 9 April 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Abu al-Abbas al-Nabati."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Blocked – 48 hours. The IP is reverting the article for unclear reasons and won't explain their edits on Talk. EdJohnston (talk) 17:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: 1945 college football season (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Jeff in CA (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [diff] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1945_college_football_season&diff=prev&oldid=1217618537
2. [diff] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1945_college_football_season&diff=prev&oldid=1217951536
3. [diff] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1945_college_football_season&diff=prev&oldid=1218098083
4. [diff] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1945_college_football_season&diff=prev&oldid=1211283489

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [19]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [diff]

Comments:
Malformed report resulted in failed notification of Jeff in CA , so I notified them. Meters (talk) 18:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

• Page protected for one week.Bbb23 (talk) 18:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
• Puppetmaster DylanPuma20, following recent ban of sock OKState17, is back at it as IP editor 137.48.255.225. See also Oklahoma State Cowboys and Cowgirls.Jeff in CA (talk) 19:01, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Pages: List of attacks on civilians attributed to Sri Lankan government forces (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Sexual violence against Tamils in Sri Lanka (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Cossde (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [20]
2. [21]
3. [22]
4. [23]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [24]
2. [25]
3. [26]
4. [27]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [28]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

User publicly refuses to engage on both talk pages, and continues to revert after declaring this, contrary to Wikipedia consensus building policies:

[29]

[30]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [31]

Comments:

Although the reverts are not all within 24 hours, they are spread out in such a way to "game the system". I request user @Bbb23: to please look into this, as he has previously dealt with this particular editor in the context of edit warring outside of the 3RR rule. Thank you. Oz346 (talk) 13:18, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

This has been an on going

) 13:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Your last edits on both talk pages was a declaration to not further engage. And then you again reverted despite there being opposition by three separate editors. Oz346 (talk) 13:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

@

WP:NAT. Cossde (talk

) 14:58, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

@Cossde, Please show where I engaged in personal attacks in those two talk discussions in question without bringing up old unrelated discussions elsewhere. To continue to falsely accuse me of personal attacks is in itself a personal attack. ---- Petextrodon (talk) 17:01, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

@

WP:CIVIL discussion with you. Cossde (talk

) 14:09, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

No violation – there must be four or more reverts within a 24 hour period for the

3-Revert Rule to apply; the links you have provided do not meet these criteria. This is also getting a little stale right now, although I would agree there are issues here. But they are beyond the scope of this noticeboard to resolve. Daniel Case (talk

) 18:40, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

ok thanks for the clarification. I had previously thought that edit warring even outside of breaking the 3RR was penalized in certain scenarios. As of present, user Cossde has now reverted 3 times within 24 hours in both articles. In the past @Bbb23: penalized 3 reverts within 24 hours, hence my confusion. Going by past behavior, he may revert again after a few days interval to escape the 3RR. Then I assume that again means it would not be suitable to re-report? I don't want to bring up something stale again, hence why I am asking in advance. Thanks. Oz346 (talk) 15:12, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

As I predicted, Cossde has now reverted a 4th time in both articles after waiting for a brief interval to avoid censure and "game the system" (after he reverted a further 3 times in less than 24 hours [38]). Could someone please look into this @Daniel Case:, @Bbb23:. It would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Oz346 (talk) 06:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Oz346 has failed to mention here that, both Oz346 and Petextrodon have themselves have been engaging in edit waring and "game the system" as Oz346 calls it reverting to push through controversial content by brut force without respecting the burden to demonstrate verifiability by the editor who adds or restores material per

WP:PRIMARY sources to cite controversial content. This is why I have raised this issue to WP:ARC. Cossde (talk

) 12:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Battle of Khanwa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Historyonlyfavoursvictors (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [39]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [40]
2. [41]
3. [42]
4. [43]
5. [44]
6. [45]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [46]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [47]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [48]

Comments:

The user has been observed adding infos with a story on edit summary, often with poorly sourced materials [49] [50] [51] [52] etc. Despite not being open to discussion or seeking guidance from experienced editors as advised [53] [54], the user persists in their behavior. There is a need for the user to familiarize themselves with

11:16, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of one week. Bbb23 (talk) 13:10, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: McMahon Line (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 5.181.117.76 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 13:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC) ""
2. 13:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC) ""
3. Consecutive edits made from 13:40, 10 April 2024 (UTC) to 13:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
   1. 13:40, 10 April 2024 (UTC) ""
   2. 13:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC) ""
4. 13:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC) ""
5. 13:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 13:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on McMahon Line."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

This was just mindless disruption, and is continuing. Kautilya3 (talk) 13:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

• WP:AIV in that case. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions
  ) 13:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Johnny Somali (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: RowanJ_LP (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [55]
2. [56]
3. [57]
4. [58]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [59]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [60] User did not tell me to resolve the dispute on the talk page until after he's reported me.]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [61]

Comments:

User continuously erases the Controversies sub paragraph of his somali identity, uses a foreign BBC article that claims he said he was somali in a video while the article did not provide the video, citations i used was a tiktok video of himself stating his father was oromo and his mother was yemeni. there is more evidence for him being Oromo then there is for him being Somali. [62] He also failed to tell me to dispute this on the Johnny Somali talk page until after reporting me. [63]

• Both editors blocked – for a period of 24 hours Aoidh (talk) 17:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

• Declined I looked at the wrong diffs, this falls under
  WP:3RRNO #7. Aoidh (talk
  ) 17:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Johnny Somali (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Jimmybingus (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [64]
2. [65]
3. [66]
4. [67]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [68]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [69] User refused to resolve this through the talk page.

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [70]

Comments:

User continually refuses to compromise and has been warned for his behavior with edit warring.[71] User also attempts to add unreliable and uncredible sources (Reddit, TikTok, YouTube, Twitter) and uses them to edit war in the Johnny Somali article. After looking at his contributions it seems that the whole purpose of this account was just to be created to change the ethnicity of the article.[72]

• Both editors blocked – for a period of 24 hours Aoidh (talk) 17:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
• WP:3RRNO #7, but Jimmybingus did break 3RR. - Aoidh (talk
  ) 17:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Prime Minister of Canada (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 76.64.196.209 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 00:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC) "I explained very clearly. See my edit summaries."
2. 23:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1218059110 by Iwaqarhashmi (talk) - Please explain why you are restoring factually incorrect material that has been reverted."
3. 12:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1217984720 by GoodDay (talk) - Please explain why you are restoring factually-incorrect information that was reverted."
4. 00:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1217943626 by Moxy (talk) - Please explain why you are restoring factually-incorrect information that was reverted."
5. 19:43, 8 April 2024 (UTC) "None of this has anything to do with a prime minister who has resigned after losing the confidence of Parliament."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 23:19, 9 April 2024 (UTC) "Welcome to Wikipedia!"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

No luck with any response to inquiries on their talk page. Moxy🍁 00:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

They are also exhibiting the same behavior over at John Turner John Turner revision history. All we need to do is get their attention get them talking.... or at the very least replying to us. Moxy🍁 00:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of 72 hours from Prime Minister of Canada and John Turner. Daniel Case (talk) 18:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Ail al-Kahiay Campaign (1798) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Skibidi36 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: Special:diff/1217411798

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 18:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision again. I can keep going for a long time."
2. 11:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC) "This was a clear saudi victory. Undoung revision again."
3. 16:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC) "Undoing revision again."
4. 16:48, 9 April 2024 (UTC) "Undoing revision again."
5. 16:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 1st warning issued
2. 2nd warning issued
3. 18:56, 10 April 2024 (UTC) "Complete
   (RW 16.1)
   "

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

User has ignored multiple warnings on their talk page. They received their first warning for edit warring at 16:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC). Shadow311 (talk) 19:02, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

It seems the user also was edit warring on List of wars involving Saudi Arabia yesterday too. Shadow311 (talk) 19:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of 72 hours Daniel Case (talk) 19:21, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Kelly Cooney Cilella (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Exteahans71 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 01:01, 11 April 2024 (UTC) "This has just enough detail, i think this is good enough., also I fixed captiolziation errors."
2. 00:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC) "Just added additional source for this, in order to make sense. Found another article."
3. 00:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 22:26, 3 April 2024 (UTC) "/* April 2024 */ You have been blocked from editing for violation of the three-revert rule on Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken."
2. 21:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC) "/* April 2024 */ Final warning notice on Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/3RRArchive480#User:Exteahans71 reported by User:Lizthegrey (Result: Blocked one week) lizthegrey (talk) 01:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

• Indefinitely blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:32, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Jewish exodus from the Muslim world (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Lotsofsalt (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 05:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC) ""
2. 02:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC) "See talkpage"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

• User_talk:Lotsofsalt#1R_breach_at_Jewish_exodus_from_the_Muslim_world
• User_talk:Lotsofsalt#March_2024

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

After their block expired, they are once again edit warring on the same article. They also violated 1RR in full knowledge of the rule (as specified on their talk page). M.Bitton (talk) 11:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of two weeks. Bbb23 (talk) 12:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Johnny Somali (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: RowanJ_LP (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [73]
2. [74]
3. [75]
4. [76]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [diff]

Comments:
User RowanJ LP, constantly reverting and removing whole sections, trying to hide and distort information, using little to no evidence which are based on "speculative rumors" and removing evidence that are first-hand accounts of the personality Johnny Somali declaring the information for the audience. Making multiple edits removing information within 24 hours --Aurelius5150 (talk) 04:38, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

I've already been over this with another admin, the reverts fall under WP:3RRNO #7 RowanJ LP (talk) 04:41, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

• Reporter indefinitely blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Djong (ship) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Nitekuzee (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [77]
2. [78]
3. [79]
4. [80]
5. [81]
6. [82]
7. [83]
8. [84]
9. [85]
10. [86]
11. [87]
12. [88]
13. [89]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Talk:Djong (ship)#Zhou Qufei, Lingwai Daida

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [diff]

Comments:
Disagreement about removing problematic misinformation quote WP:LIE, which deliberately used a quote out of context to mislead readers. It also tried to fabricate real history by passing off description of Chinese ships to describe the Javanese ships.

I have removed the quote, but was then reverted by user Nitekuzee. This quote was pretty famous and used in many publication to describe Chinese ships so i have provided multiple evidences to show that it was indeed quote of Chinese ships, but Nitekuzee continue to deny it and refuse to reply with logic (as seen from his nonsensical replies on the talk page) while still didn't provide a single credible evidence on how he think it could be Javanese ships and also continue to use the distorted quote rather than the real quote from the real source. (p.s i'm aware that i have made 4 reverts, because i thought the removal of template and misinformation by using real source were obvious vandalism and can be reverted as many times, now i know i was mistaken) Merzostin (talk) 08:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)}}

• Stale. Bbb23 (talk) 12:48, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

  can i ask what does this mean? Merzostin (talk) 13:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

  It means that the edit-warring occurred too long ago, in this case two days ago.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

  so if someone didn't report edit warring fast enough, it's fine for them to do the edits warring? what about the revert? should it be reverted to the original, i'm kinda confused Merzostin (talk) 14:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

  Generally, blocks are intended to prevent ongoing disruption. If the disruption has seemingly stopped, sanctions are no longer necessary. If you believe that there is a persistent problem with the user's conduct, then you can take them to

  WP:ANI. I express no opinion as to the merits of such a complaint, though.--Bbb23 (talk

  ) 14:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

  The User in question, I believe DID cease disruptive editing on the article after I advised on his/her talk page that continuation would lead to a block. Collaboration is the cornerstone of the project. Regards,   Aloha27  talk  19:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Civic Platform (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Max19582 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [90]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 17:34, 10 April 2024‎ (UTC) "Undid revision 1218259691 by Helper201 (talk), please get the consensus yourself as both the policies i provided are currently against what you're doing."
2. 17:29, 10 April 2024‎ (UTC) "Undid revision 1218258819 by Helper201 (talk) that's what neither of the policy says, with your edit the word "center" is inconsistent with the rest."
3. 17:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1218240347 by Helper201 (talk), MOS:ARTCOM, the article should be written in one variety consistently; "centre" is not a valid spelling in American English which is used per MOS:RETAIN."
4. 13:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1217931734 by Helper201 (talk) both main text and infobox are in american english per MOS:RETAIN."

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Both users tried to solve the dispute through a user talk page, but started the reverts again - [91]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [92]

Comments:

• WP:3RR. Why did you report only one of them?--Bbb23 (talk
  ) 22:59, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Right, probably should have reported both. I just saw that the user I did report seems to have started it. Brat Forelli🦊 02:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

@Brat Forelli: It was not my intent to edit war (the fourth edit you linked seems to have been outside the 24-hour window, but I agree the situation could have been handled better) and I dropped from reverting the article as soon as I saw an edit war emerge. No reverts have been made to the article (by neither me nor the other user involved) in the past 22 hours. While I do not agree with the user's changes, I don't think advocating for reverting such a minor dispute is worth time of either of us, so on my part I won't be contributing the article anymore regarding this particular matter. Max19582 (talk) 15:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Declined per above, as user's decision to withdraw from editing the article means, as he says, there is no continuing issue here. Daniel Case (talk) 19:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Vivienne Medrano (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 2600:1002:B03E:1C3B:0:31:3603:5001 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 13:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC) ""
2. 13:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC) ""
3. 12:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 13:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on Vivienne Medrano."
2. 13:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. 13:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC) on User talk:2600:1002:B03E:1C3B:0:31:3603:5001 "Message re.
   HG
   ) (3.4.12)"

Comments: Adding BLP violations sourced to Tumblr and YouTube. —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 13:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

the whole /64. Daniel Case (talk

) 19:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Christianity in Iraq (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: ArezKader (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: Here, user blanked a section of cited text, calling it "supported by no citation" even though it was clearly supported by citation.

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. restored preferred version once (no meaningful summary)
2. .. twice (no meaningful summary)
3. .. thrice (still no meaningful summary)
4. .. and once more for good measure

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: ArezKeder opened a discussion (at my urging) at

, instead ramming their facts down Wikipedia's throats.

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [93]

Comments:

• Partially blocked – for a period of 2 weeks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Punjabi language (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: UnbiasedSN (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [94]
2. [95]
3. [96]
4. [97]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [98]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [99]

Comments: The user has an issue with treating Wikipedia as

and does not bother to open a discussion on talk pages and instead resort to reverts.

Would like to state user نعم البدل is engaged in the same behavior, and reverted my edit first without even reading the source which is factually wrong in this case. Link is to a severely outdated government website that makes no mention of his claim. I also warned them about their behavior first. This is just a case of gotcha first. He also proceeds to curse and get aggressive when confronted otherwise. The user has a pending disruptive editing incident on the Administration Board. UnbiasedSN (talk) 06:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

• Page protected ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Guts (Olivia Rodrigo album) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 83.10.178.213 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 01:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Change of music genres"
2. 01:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Change of music genres"
3. 23:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC) "Genre music change"
4. 22:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC) "Change of music genre"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 01:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Guts (Olivia Rodrigo album)."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Will also include their initial edit under a different IP address, as 83.10.248.79 [100] - undoubtedly the same person. MPFitz1968 (talk) 01:24, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

• Already blocked ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:44, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Russ Cook (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 92.184.104.3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 18:44, 12 April 2024 (UTC) ""
2. 18:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Corrected a false statement again"
3. Consecutive edits made from 18:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC) to 18:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
   1. 18:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Corrected a false claim"
   2. 18:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Running the length of Africa */Corrected a false statement again"
4. Consecutive edits made from 17:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC) to 18:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
   1. 17:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Added precision"
   2. 18:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Corrected a false statement"
5. Consecutive edits made from 17:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC) to 17:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
   1. 17:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Again I corrected a claim being branded as a fact"
   2. 17:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Again corrected a false statement"
   3. 17:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Corrected false statements"
6. Consecutive edits made from 17:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC) to 17:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
   1. 17:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Corrected a false statement"
   2. 17:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "There is no definition of “entire” or “full” length of Africa. The science of geography defines the “length” of teh continent (which is measured at 8000km) but there is no such distinction as “entire” or “full”. A length. Please acknowledge this. Thanks"
   3. 17:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Again I am correcting a claim branded as a fact. For a record to be established, it has to be awarded by the institution or governing body of that discipline. Records cannot be self-awarded - and if they are, they do not belong to Wikipedia"
7. 16:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Corrected another instance where a claim was branded as a fact"
8. Consecutive edits made from 16:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC) to 16:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
   1. 16:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "I corrected earlier. Then it was erased. I wrote the truth again, which is that Mr Cook is not the first and doesnt hold any record (yet) as regards his Africa run."
   2. 16:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Wrote back what had been erased earlier by a third user"
   3. 16:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Corrected a fact that was wrong"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 17:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "General note: Unconstructive editing on Russ Cook."
2. 17:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing on Project Africa."
3. 18:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. 18:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "/* A claim is not a fact */ Reply"

Comments:

IP did finally open a discussion on the talk page but still repeatedly restored to their preferred version rather than letting the discussion proceed to gain consensus. I also tagged the article as disputed on their behalf as they may have valid argument but are going about it the wrong way. Suggest page blocking to allow them to participate on the talk page. S0091 (talk) 19:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

And another after I filed this report. S0091 (talk) 19:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

• Page protected ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Sexual violence against Tamils in Sri Lanka (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Page: List of attacks on civilians attributed to Sri Lankan government forces (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Cossde (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [101]
2. [102]
3. [103]
4. [104]
5. [105]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [106]
2. [107]
3. [108]
4. [109]
5. [110]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [111] [112] [113]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [114] [115]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [116]

Comments: This user was reported recently on here by another user for edit warring on two pages by gaming the system. Since no violation was found, they've been only emboldened to continue their edit warring which has now escalated to the point of vandalism, with cited content being removed. This to me appears to be clear case of gaming the system as defined above: "Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation." Without admin intervention, I fear this issue will continue indefinitely. --- Petextrodon (talk) 04:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

As I have mentioned in the other report, both users Petextrodon and Oz346 have been engaging in

WP:BATTLE to push content without building consensus in the talk page. Due to the disruptive editing by these uses I have request page protection [117], [118] and ARC. Cossde (talk) Cossde (talk

) 06:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

 Note: The closing administrator may be interested in the result of Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case § Sri Lanka motion, independently of how this specific request here is closed. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Declined The case seems stale as talk page discussion continues while edit warring does not, but since interactions between these two editors were a not-inconsiderable part of getting Sri Lanka designated as a contentious topic, it has not been in vain. Daniel Case (talk) 18:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

@Daniel Case Could you please clarify what "gaming the system" means here since I could have misunderstood it? The edit warring stopped when this user was reported last time too and they went back to it which I fear will happen again. Does this mean more than 3 reverts are permitted as long as they are outside the 24-hour period and don't happen while an AN3 report is pending? Also, neither I nor the reported user engaged in talk discussions after the report was filed.--- Petextrodon (talk) 19:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

See

WP:BLOCKP

. Yes, if this happens again, if it involves both of you fearlessly continuing to edit with the unshakeable determination to make Wikipedia's newest contentious topic are, the first one ever designated by ArbCom without an underlying case, its most contentious, will be met with all the sanctions now warranted, with topic bans on the table, as I'm not the only admin who is absolutely sick of seeing your names and the same articles on these noticeboards with absolutely no sign of any awareness on the part of either of you of just how indifferent you seem to community norms.

For the life of you, for the good of the project, I beg you, I beseech you, strongly consider taking at least a month off from these articles and go edit some other, widely different topic area like sewing or golf or something else, whatever, where you can show us all that you can do good for the project. Daniel Case (talk) 23:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

@

WP:1RR apply now? --- Petextrodon (talk

) 00:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

No, unless it becomes part of the standard set of restrictions, which so far is the case only with ARBIPA. But it could easily be imposed by an admin under CTOPS, and CTTOI that might be the better solution to this issue before handing out topic bans. Daniel Case (talk) 02:40, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: International marriage (Japan) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 119.47.250.200 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. Consecutive edits made from 11:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC) to 11:08, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
   1. 11:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC) "Lack of NOTABILITY"
   2. 11:08, 13 April 2024 (UTC) "Lack of NOTABILITY"
2. Consecutive edits made from 10:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC) to 10:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
   1. 10:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Marriage */Lack of NOTABILITY Accurate content also added"
   2. 10:57, 13 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Divorce */Lack of NOTABILITY Accurate content also added"
   3. 10:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC) "/* American-Japanese */Lack of NOTABILITY Accurate content also added"
3. Consecutive edits made from 10:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC) to 10:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
   1. 10:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC) "/* American-Japanese */Lack of NOTABILITY Accurate content also added"
   2. 10:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Marriage */Lack of NOTABILITY Accurate content also added"
   3. 10:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Divorce */Lack of NOTABILITY Accurate content also added"
4. Consecutive edits made from 09:48, 13 April 2024 (UTC) to 09:57, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
   1. 09:48, 13 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Marriage (2017) */Remove incorrect information and add accurate information"
   2. 09:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Marriage (2017) */Remove incorrect information and add accurate information"
   3. 09:54, 13 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Divorce (2012-2018) */Delete unnecessary information and add new information"
   4. 09:57, 13 April 2024 (UTC) "/* American-Japanese */Remove incorrect information and add accurate information"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 10:13, 13 April 2024 (UTC) "/* International marriage (Japan) */ new section"
2. 10:44, 13 April 2024 (UTC) see edit summary

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. 11:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Regarding "Marriage and divorce trends" section */ new section"

Comments:

4th revert is in response to another user. AbsoluteWissen (talk) 11:13, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

User is continuing to edit war. I have reverted them a couple of times at this point, but I am going to refrain from here on out per

) 14:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Continued edit warring even after notification of EW and even notice of this very discussion Q ^{T C} 17:28, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: 2024 Louth County Council election (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 84.203.98.219 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: here

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 11 April, 6:46pm
2. 11 April, 6:48pm
3. 12 April, 7:29pm
4. 12 April, 11:13pm
5. 13 April, 6:21pm
6. 13 April, 7:14pm

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [119]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [120]

Comments:
Consistent breaches of

, repeatedly reverting removals of additions of content without a source. — ser! ^{(chat to me - see my edits)} 18:28, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of 36 hours Daniel Case (talk) 19:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: List of highest-grossing Malayalam films (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: HedCET (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 11:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC) "add Malikappuram based on various news reports from major indian medias"
2. 11:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1218871711 by Ds1480 (talk)"
3. 05:32, 14 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1218773468 by Ds1480 (talk) Unknown reason for this modifications"
4. 17:17, 13 April 2024 (UTC) "add Malikappuram movie report"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 11:48, 14 April 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. 10:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC) on List of highest-grossing Malayalam films "/* Highest-grossing films worldwide */Promotional figures are not considered as legitimate. I have updated the collection in the movie's page. Please check it before editing it back. If you think it is a mistake from my side, please contact me through my talk page."

Comments:

Edit warring to add promotional box office figure to the article after multiple warnings. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 11:57, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

• Indefinitely blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Indigenous peoples of the Americas (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 2001:1388:19:A28B:E960:3B0E:5433:5E74 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

1. [121]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 04:20, 14 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1218838406 by General Ization (talk)"
2. 04:16, 14 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1218835910 by Oncamera (talk) 9.7 "either alone or in combination with another race", 3.7 alone, 9.7 - 3.7 = 6 (or 5.9 with decimals), it clearly says "two or more races (in combination) population 5.9 million""
3. 03:16, 14 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1218783596 by Oncamera (talk) Read the USA article genius"
4. Consecutive edits made from 18:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC) to 18:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
   1. 18:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1218668350 by Oncamera (talk) Learn to do math"
   2. 18:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 04:19, 14 April 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Indigenous peoples of the Americas."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Also

04:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

• Result: Semiprotected two months due to long term edit warring by a fluctuating IP. EdJohnston (talk) 17:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Byzantine–Norman wars (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 68.226.25.24 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 1
2. 2

Other articles

1. 1
2. 2

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Edit warring with

. 00:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of one week for disruptive editing. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 01:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: List of awards and nominations received by Sarah Geronimo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: User:Dha BSMYR (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [122]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [123]
2. [124]
3. [125]
4. [126]
5. [127]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [128],

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [129]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [130]

Comments:

• WP:NOTHERE Itssheenabautista (talk
  ) 13:16, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

• Update, user has been blocked for a week by an admin from the page protection group. Will raise in the future if behavior persists after the block has lapsed. Thank you. Itssheenabautista (talk) 13:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of one week via RFPP, by me, for a pattern of disruptive editing. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 13:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: 2014 Crimean parliamentary election (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Mellk (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version before the edit war: [131]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [132]
2. [133]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [134]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Talk:2014 Crimean parliamentary election#Results

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [135]

Comments:

There is an edit war ongoing at 2014 Crimean parliamentary election‎. Please revert the page to the version before the edit war and encourage editors to seek consensus, not to push their change using an edit war. ManyAreasExpert (talk) 11:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

First revert was made on 16:07, 13 April 2024 and second revert was made on 11:11, 15 April 2024. This is not a 3RR violation. Mellk (talk) 11:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

• Declined. The editor didn't pass the 3RR limit, but more importantly, they are using the talk page now, which is promising. For now, nothing to do. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 13:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: List of I Dream of Jeannie episodes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Chafe66 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [136]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_I_Dream_of_Jeannie_episodes&oldid=1215416501
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_I_Dream_of_Jeannie_episodes&oldid=1215641305
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_I_Dream_of_Jeannie_episodes&oldid=1216102186
4. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_I_Dream_of_Jeannie_episodes&oldid=1216813527

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_I_Dream_of_Jeannie_episodes&action=history

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_I_Dream_of_Jeannie_episodes&action=history

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chafe66&oldid=1218413567#I_Dream_of_Jeannie_plot_rewrites

Comments:
Advised user

) 14:59, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

• Both users are edit-warring; neither has violated 3RR.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:04, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

• Additionally, the two users are the only editors who have edited the article in the last few weeks in a continuous edit war, and neither has discussed the dispute on the article Talk page. I have therefore pblocked both editors for two weeks from editing the article.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

  Can we discuss it here? User Wk3v78k23tnsa sort of masquerades as an auto-message generator or WP admin (using terms above like "advised user" etc), and cites general WP pages without specifics and therefore pretty much uselessly. I believe I have a fairly good case against Wk3v78k23tnsa's bold edits. (A point against their edits, not a justification of an edit war, which I cop to.) Chafe66 (talk) 06:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

• Already blocked by Bbb23. This is not the place for making a case against an editor. Take it to ANI. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 13:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Dum Dum Lok Sabha constituency (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: SGupta2003 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Soumava2002 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [137]

Diffs of the user's reverts: Currently:

1. [138]
2. [139]
3. [140]

Previously:

1. [141]
2. [142]
3. [143]
4. [144]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [145]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [146]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

1. [147]
2. [148]

Comments:
Previously reported at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/3RRArchive480#User:Jack_deGrasse_Tyson,_J._Doe,_et_al;_reported_by_User:Mikeblas_(Result:_Already_blocked), almost immediately closed as "already blocked". Problems persist, and I worry that I'm chasing sock puppets. Am I using the wrong notice board to request help with this issue?

• No violation – there must be four or more reverts within a 24 hour period for the
  3-Revert Rule to apply; the links you have provided do not meet these criteria. Really, this board is for clear 4 reverts in 24 hours or it is very obvious they are gaming the system, not for discussions or deeper analysis. Protracted problems should go to ANI. Dennis Brown - 2¢
  13:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Well, yes, but remember this article is in a designated contentious topic. If edit warring continues, 1RR might be worth considering. Daniel Case (talk) 17:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: John G. Stackhouse Jr. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Pixel-Lead453 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. Consecutive edits made from 20:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC) to 20:48, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
   1. 20:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC) "Intentionally inflammatory section header; Russ Woodroofe engaging in vandalism"
   2. 20:48, 15 April 2024 (UTC) "Content is not sourced; Russ Woodroofe engaging in vandalism"
2. 20:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC) "Intentionally inflammatory section header"
3. 20:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC) "Intentionally inflammatory section header"
4. 20:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC) "Departure from Crandall University: Header improvement"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 20:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC) "/* April 2024 */ 3rr warning"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

No-Falcon-4996 was blocked by

) 20:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Pixel-Lead453 was blocked as a sock. This can be closed. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 22:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

• Already blocked Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Delhi University Students Union (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Jinjin_Sa (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Delhi_University_Students_Union&oldid=1182284806: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [149]
2. [150]
3. [151]
4. [152]
5. [153]
6. [154]
7. [155]
8. [156]
9. [157]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [158] [159] [160]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [diff]

Comments:
User Jinjin Sa is spamming to the level of vandal the unofficial and unsourced information. The information is related to the unofficial office bearers viz. Sports President, Sports Secretary, Cultural Secretary, Cultural President, etc. The DUSU consists of four office bearers and the Office Bearers are not authorised to appoint or create any other post or designation. Further, I am unable to hyperlink the user being reported so the link to her/his talk page is - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jinjin_Sa.

iAshwinDeshmukh Deshmukh.3851 talk 11:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

• Indefinitely pblocked from editing the article. Technically, this report is stale, but the user is an obvious
  WP:SPA who is clearly affiliated with the student union (see their previous username), and shouldn't be editing the article directly at all, let alone edit-warring over changes they wish to make.--Bbb23 (talk
  ) 13:21, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Chikmagalur (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Suyodhana 95 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. Consecutive edits made from 14:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC) to 14:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
   1. 14:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Transport */"
   2. 14:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC) ""
   3. 14:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC) ""
2. Consecutive edits made from 13:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC) to 13:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
   1. 13:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Transport */Non anglicised the names of the towns. Changed Bijapur to Vijayapura, due to multiple "Bijapur" cities across India."
   2. 13:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Transport */"
3. 12:43, 16 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Transport */Removed the anglicised names and replaces them with Native names in ENGLISH. No INDIC SCRIPT"
4. Consecutive edits made from 07:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC) to 07:51, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
   1. 07:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Transport */"
   2. 07:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Transport */"
   3. 07:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Transport */"
   4. 07:51, 16 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Transport */"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 12:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Common name */ new section"
2. 12:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC) "Reply"
3. 12:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Common name */"
4. 12:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Common name */ tweak"
5. 13:22, 16 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Common name */ Reply"
6. 13:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Chikmagalur."
7. 13:51, 16 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Common name */ Reply"
8. 14:04, 16 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Common name */ Reply"
9. 14:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Common name */ Comment"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Keeps repeatedly changing the

) 14:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

• Older diffs of them not following WP:COMMONNAME [163], followed by my edits [164]; [165] (mine [166]). In other articles [167] (mine [168]), [169]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

  Thanks, Fylindfotberserk. Regarding the possible block evasion announcement, I'd say it's more likely that the user thought blocks are generally IP-based rather than account based. To avoid confusion and bad excuses, I have added a warning to the partial block. Please let me know if the disruption continues. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

• Partially blocked – for a period of 2 weeks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

  Absolutely. Thanks ToBeFree. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:51, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Lex Fridman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: FeldmarschallGneisenau (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [170]
2. [171]
3. [172]
4. [173]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [174][175]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [176]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [177]

Comments:

• Repeated attempts to insert FOIA documents / primary material as a source. Zenomonoz (talk) 04:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Public records are reliable sources. Or are you implying that public records contain lies and are not reliable for some reason? Freedom of Information allows us to witness true information from the Government. I suspect this user is engaged in advocacy and whitewashing. His "cabal approved" self-label is telling. Possible breaking of

WP:NOTADVOCACY merits an investigation of its own.FeldmarschallGneisenau (talk

) 01:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Note for investigating admins: there was some discussion with evidence for possible sockpuppetry at [178]. NicolausPrime (talk) 00:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Dear @NicolausPrime, if there was evidence, it wouldn't be closed. Someone tried to frame me as someone else and failed. Idk why you would brag about failure. Despicable well-poisoning.FeldmarschallGneisenau (talk) 01:32, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

RS/N—that these documents might be acceptable sources here. Daniel Case (talk

) 01:52, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Fine. Point taken. Thanks for showing that primary sources can be used in straightforward matters of fact. However just to note, I have not witnessed Zenomonoz's attention to

WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD, the opposite in fact.FeldmarschallGneisenau (talk

) 02:16, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

I believe

WP:BLPPRIMARY, which states "Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public documents, to support assertions about a living person." (bolding mine). NicolausPrime (talk

) 02:29, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

@Daniel Case re: primary source. This wasn't a govt document confirming his birth name. It is a request to the DNI submitted by the journalist Julia Black (see requester column on right). Black is the one alleging this is his birth name, presumably from an old unsourced version of his Wikipedia entry. Black makes no mention of this alleged birth name in her eventual reporting. In summary: no government agency has actually confirmed this is birth name. Zenomonoz (talk) 02:41, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Well, OK, that's different; I wish I had read somebody saying that in edit summaries ... or on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Naagin (2015 TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: OCDD (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [179]
2. [180]
3. [181]
4. [182]
5. [183]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [184]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: discussion

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [185]

Comments:
I have warned them several times [186][187][188] but they never responded to any warning.

) 10:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

• Both users have reverted 3x in the last 24 hours. Neither has started a discussion on the article Talk page. Good job, both of you.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

  I started a discussion on their talk page but they didn't respond.

  Someonewhoisusinginternet (talk

  ) 13:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

  No violation – there must be four or more reverts within a 24 hour period for the

  3-Revert Rule to apply; the links you have provided do not meet these criteria. I think that at this point the best thing to do would be full-protect the article for a while, but I'm not willing to do that without someone requesting it (also, it's necessary to set a watchlist ping when doing so as we cannot currently layer protections, so the existing indef semi will have to be reset when the full protect expires). Daniel Case (talk

  ) 02:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

  @

  Someonewhoisusinginternet (talk

  ) 04:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

  Page protected in full for three days; I have set up a watchlist ping in order to restore the previous indef semi.

  In the future if this continues I might be partial to giving the article a CTOPS tag under

  ARBIPA; while it does not seem like the edit warring here is related to the issues specific to the topic that often trigger long protection under it (and as I've said elsewhere, most of the edit warring we have over Indian TV and cinema is over the same aspects of those areas as cinema and TV elsewhere in the world, so why should that trigger CTOPS by itself for Bollywood when it doesn't for Hollywood?), we have used it in some cases where the disruption has gotten to be too much, and CTOPS would make available possible (emphasis possible) future remedies like 1RR if this keeps being a problem. Daniel Case (talk

  ) 05:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Numerous film pages (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 1.145.35.251 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

IP in Australia is contstantly changing a mass of film pages with their own version of "effects". They have been prevously blocked on 101.180.97.95 and changed from 1.145.121.196. They have not responded to any editors comments and warnings and appear to change from IP numbers to change back to their preferred version. David J Johnson (talk) 10:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

• Blocked Special:contributions/1.145.35.0/24 for two weeks.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:29, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Fakhar-e-Alam (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: CHARLIE INGRAM (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 07:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC) "inaccurate personal information misleading."
2. 07:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC) "inaccurate personal information."
3. 06:52, 17 April 2024 (UTC) "Inaccurate private information"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 07:01, 17 April 2024 (UTC) "Notice: Original research warning on Fakhar-e-Alam."
2. 07:33, 17 April 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Removal of content, blanking on Fakhar-e-Alam."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

A SPI has been initiated at

) 07:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

• Page protected ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

@ToBeFree: Would it be OK to reinstate the sourced material? --—Saqib (talk | contribs) 17:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

WP:BLPRESTORE, but if I had intended to enforce this strictly and technically, I'd have chosen full protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk

) 18:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

I see your point, but the user probably won't participate in the discussion on the talk page. Plus, there's the issue of it being a sock account. --—Saqib (talk | contribs) 19:07, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Naoya Inoue (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 2607:FEA8:63A1:AB00:48A8:B4AE:65C8:6EE9 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [189] – my first attempt to streamline the lead.

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [190]
2. [191]
3. [192]
4. [193]
5. [194]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [195]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: One-sided talk page discussion

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [196]

Comments:
In the past two weeks, a Canada-based IP has reverted on five occasions the streamlining I've made to the article's lead section. As I've noted at the talk page, their revision is poorly written overall:

• "He" this and "He" that for every sentence;
• "He is also the former" is nonsensical, as there have been previous undisputed bantamweight champions;
• It is bereft of paragraphs for readability, yet has an inexplicable double line break after the first huge chunk of text;
• Inoue's athletic intangibles and knockout successes are listed in a highly
  crufty
  manner before his numerous – and historically notable – championship achievements;
• His nickname is unnecessarily in bold and incorrectly places the quotes in bold too;
• The sanctioning organisations (WBA, WBC, IBF, WBO) should all be fully written on the first instance, per
  MOS:ABBR
  ;
• My use of
  efn
  to consolidate the myriad titles Inoue has held is much better than listing each one in separate, clunky year ranges.

I would extend a talk page invitation but they change IPs like a new pair of socks, and they should know about talk pages by now (first time they edited the article was in July 2023). 3RR has not been tripped, but it's a slow edit war nonetheless. DRN is not really an option because of how one-sided it is.

To summarise, my edition of the lead improves readability, is concise, and adheres to various MOS. The IP's edition is an unwieldy, poorly written block of text filled with cruft. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 18:23, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

• Page protected ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Mac Dreamstate, thank you very much for your discussion attempts at Talk:Naoya Inoue. The unregistered editor would be welcome to join the discussion, perhaps preferably with an account so that their user talk page is usable too. If page protection turns out to be insufficient at achieving this, please let me know. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Viggo Mortensen (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 213.233.104.193 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 18:33, 17 April 2024 (UTC) "Has Danish name, his father was Danish, has Danish citizenship, spent a lot of time in Denmark, can speak Danish, he identifies as Danish...some sad lardbucket americucks erase his identity, tragic"
2. 18:29, 17 April 2024 (UTC) ">has Danish name"
3. 18:16, 17 April 2024 (UTC) "You're unsourced"
4. 18:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC) "You're the one being a vandal here"
5. 18:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC) "'Murican appropriation at it's finest, he has Danish citizenship, his father ia Danish, his name is totally Danish and he spent a lot of time in Denmark"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 18:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Viggo Mortensen."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Ignoring existing discussion about topic on talk page but has commented in it. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Also same edit warring using Special:Contributions/2A02:2F0F:F20B:9500::/64. Both now blocked for a day and article got a short protect. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Page protected for three days by Jauerback Daniel Case (talk) 02:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

CTOPS notice added to talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Mike Johnson (Louisiana politician) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Wicorbottt (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 08:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC) "updated Ukraine section"
2. 21:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1218947528 by Pbritti (talk) Every single word is backed up by quotes. Tone is neutral."
3. 20:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC) "restored vandalism by Pbritti"
4. 20:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC) "Ukraine update"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 15:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC) "/* April 2024 */ Final warning"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. 21:15, 14 April 2024 (UTC) "/* NPOV on Ukraine */ new section"

Comments:

Editor was warned for edit warring to restore POV/original research content on the BLP in question. They have been repeatedly warned about falsely accusing other editors of vandalism, an action they have repeated despite these warnings. Further, they engaged in now-oversighted harassment on their talk page. Their only engagement in the article talk page discussion has been to reiterate their accusations of vandalism; after making this accusation, they again restored the content without any consensus to do so. Pbritti (talk) 19:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

• Partially blocked – for a period of 2 weeks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

  @ToBeFree: regarding the indefinite semi-protection to Mike Johnson (Louisiana politician), I can ping you just in case you miss restoring it. ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

  Pbritti, a talk page message would be wonderful. I've set up a calendar entry but who knows if I'll still use the same calendar program in a year. Thank you very much! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

  Here's to all of us being around next year (and remembering!). ~ Pbritti (talk) 00:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

  You can also set up the W-Ping tool to do it automatically. Daniel Case (talk) 03:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Las Mujeres Ya No Lloran World Tour (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: ShakiraFandom (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

1. [197]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [198]
2. [199]

Other Attempts of the user's disruptive reverts:

1. [200]
2. [201]

No violation – there must be four or more reverts within a 24 hour period for the

3-Revert Rule to apply; the links you have provided do not meet these criteria. Daniel Case (talk

) 03:24, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Deng Xiaoping (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Grizi fu (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 08:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1219679141 by Remsense (talk) talk page hasn’t agreed on anything yet + user is edit waring"
2. Consecutive edits made from 13:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC) to 13:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
   1. 13:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC) "I exchanged a confusing term for foreign audiences and exchanged it with simpler English"
   2. 13:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC) "I clarified the term I used. I used a more western term because this page is made for western audiences and only using Chinese terms is not good for western audiences"
3. 10:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1219536179 by Remsense (talk) user is removing edits in good faith"
4. 10:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1219535678 by Remsense (talk) I did give a reason so it wasn’t in good faith, the talk page never agreed on anything"
5. 10:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1219533598 by Remsense (talk) the talk page never agreed on anything"
6. Consecutive edits made from 09:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC) to 09:47, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
   1. 09:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1218041209 by 78.104.180.89 (talk) just because the Chinese government didn’t use this term doesn’t men it’s wrong"
   2. 09:47, 18 April 2024 (UTC) "It’s completely useless to point out that a Chinese president had a Chinese passport. It however helps more to say that he was a politician, that’s why I changed it"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. 05:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Introduction box */ Reply"
2. 08:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Introduction box */ Reply"

Comments:

Presently stonewalling in favor of what is obviously unacceptable prose, after a pattern of edit warring that began several weeks ago but kicked into gear yesterday. Remsense诉 08:32, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

I quite literally never got a good reason to remove my edits. My edits were randomly removed, without a proper reason dragging me into a stupid edit war, where I have tried to make the situation better by changing my edits to compromise. And the first edit skirmish I had, was never resolved as the user I had the skirmish with never responded, thus not allowing there to be a solution. Grizi fu (talk) 08:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Also I agreed to calm down and accept the other position. Grizi fu (talk) 13:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

• Warned given that
  WP:3RR breach here, so Grizi fu you need to stop reverting now and concentrate on dialogue. Further edit warring will be met with a block.  — Amakuru (talk
  ) 13:06, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

ObsessedWithStarship II reported by Me Da Wikipedian

Just about all contributions are edit warring/insisting why they are not. Refuses to listen, has been warned, etc. Pinging other users who have been dealing with them @Redacted II, @IlkkaP, and @Andyjsmith Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Here is a description of all eleven of ObsessedWithStarship II's edits:

Edit 1: Claimed IFT-3 was a failure, despite the (disputed) closing of the RfC, which declared it a success. Reverted by Andyjsmith

Edit 2: Undid closing of previously mentioned RfC. Reverted by Andyjsmith

Edit 3: Claimed IFT-3 propellant transfer results were still pending, despite numerous sources calling the prop-transfer a success. Reverted by me.

Edit 4: Claimed IFT-3 was a partial failure, using misinterpreted source. Reverted by me.

Edit 5: Unreverted Edit 3, citing outdated source. Reverted by Me Da Wikipedian.

Edit 6: Unreverted edit 4, again interpreted source. Reverted by IlkkaP.

Edit 7: Removed statement on Super Heavy Lift Launch Vehicles describing IFT-3 as a success. Reverted by me.

Edit 8: Removed statement on Starship HLS stating IFT-3 successfully reached the desired orbit. Reverted by me.

Edit 9: Response to my Edit Warring warning, denying wrongdoing while accusing me of edit warring.

Edit 10: Another response, further accusation.

Edit 11: Unreverted edit 5. Reverted by me. Redacted II (talk) 22:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

• Declined – malformed report. Please use the "Click here to create a new report" link at the top of this page, which gives a template report, and provide complete
  diffs. Bbb23 (talk
  ) 22:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Pages:
SpaceX Starship (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 3 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Starship HLS (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Super heavy-lift launch vehicle (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: ObsessedWithStarship II (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [202][203][204]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [205]
2. [206]
3. [207]
4. [208]
5. [209]
6. [210]
7. [211]
8. [212]
9. [213]
10. [214]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [215]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [216]

Comments:
Every single edit by the reported user has been to push the IFT-3 failure narrative, with the only two exceptions being reponses to my edit-warring warning.Redacted II (talk) 22:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Here is a description of all eleven of ObsessedWithStarship II's edits:

Edit 1: Claimed IFT-3 was a failure, despite the (disputed) closing of the RfC, which declared it a success. Reverted by Andyjsmith

Edit 2: Undid closing of previously mentioned RfC. Reverted by Andyjsmith

Edit 3: Claimed IFT-3 propellant transfer results were still pending, despite numerous sources calling the prop-transfer a success. Reverted by me.

Edit 4: Claimed IFT-3 was a partial failure, using misinterpreted source. Reverted by me.

Edit 5: Unreverted Edit 3, citing outdated source. Reverted by Me Da Wikipedian.

Edit 6: Unreverted edit 4, again interpreted source. Reverted by IlkkaP.

Edit 7: Removed statement on Super Heavy Lift Launch Vehicles describing IFT-3 as a success. Reverted by me.

Edit 8: Removed statement on Starship HLS stating IFT-3 successfully reached the desired orbit. Reverted by me.

Edit 9: Response to my Edit Warring warning, denying wrongdoing while accusing me of edit warring.

Edit 10: Another response, further accusation.

Edit 11: Unreverted edit 5. Reverted by me. Redacted II (talk) 22:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Support block as orginal reporter. Thanks for fixing this@Redacted II Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 22:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

• Reposting, was declared malformed due to missing a step in filling out template.

  Will repost in a few seconds.

  And @Me Da Wikipedian, thanks! Redacted II (talk) 22:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

A previous report was filed by Me Da Wikipedian, but it was rejected due to not following the template.Redacted II (talk) 22:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

• Indefinitely blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:04, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Purdue University Global (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Ushistorygeek (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [217]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [218]
2. [219]
3. [220]
4. [221]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [222]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [223]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [224]

Comments:

• Blocked indefinitely ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:22, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Battle of Pangal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Sathyashraya (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [225]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [226]
2. [227]
3. [228]
4. [229]
5. [230]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [231]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [232]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [233]

Comments:

Became suddenly active, currently doing disruptive editing at many articles. Potential edit warring at Umayyad campaigns in India too where the user is continuously reverting to a version, which has been reverted by several other editors earlier for its non neutral nature.Imperial^[AFCND] 12:54, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of one week. I almost blocked indefinitely as the user has been disruptive since they created their account on on March 19, 2024.Bbb23 (talk) 14:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

  It is similar to another user. I've reported a sockpuppet investigation on this, with evidences. The pattern is again similar. Imperial^[AFCND] 14:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 92.10.136.207 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [234]
2. [235]
3. [236]
4. [237]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [238]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [239]

Comments:

• Result: The IP editor was blocked 72 hours by User:Ohnoitsjamie. EdJohnston (talk) 03:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: SpaceX Starship (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Redacted II (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: 20:01, 9 April 2024 (UTC) Addition of success outcome in infobox

Diffs of the user's reverts: SpaceX Starship

1. 11:17, 16 April 2024‎ (UTC) Revert of height
2. 21:29, 17 April 2024 (UTC) Revert of outcome to success
3. 11:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC) Revert of specific impulse
4. 11:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC) Revert of outcome to success
5. 20:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC) Revert of outcome to success

SpaceX Starship integrated flight test 3

1. 17:40, 25 March 2024 (UTC) Initial change of status to success
2. 20:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC) Revert to success in table
3. 21:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC) Revert to success in table

Super heavy-lift launch vehicle

1. 12:57, 10 March 2024 (UTC) Revert to partial success in table
2. 14:53, 16 March 2024 (UTC) Revert to success in table
3. 21:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC) Revert to success in table
4. 00:33, 18 March 2024 (UTC) Revert to success in table
5. 12:56, 22 March 2024 (UTC) Revert to success in table
6. 11:15, 27 March 2024 (UTC) Revert to success in table
7. 21:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC) Revert of success in article's body
8. 21:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC) Revert of success in article's body

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: 12:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Super heavy-lift launch vehicle: 13:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: 12:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: 23:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Comments:
Multiple editors have engaged in edit warring across SpaceX Starship-related articles, but Redacted II has performed a large number of reverts with little attempt to engage in discussion or

after their last block. After multiple warnings for edit warring, they are well informed of the rules.

This report is for the SpaceX Starship article, but I provided diffs of two additional articles and the mention of the edit war at SpaceX Starship flight tests to provide the additional context that this editor has and continues to engage in edit warring across the SpaceX Starship topic. A temporary topic ban may be warranted. Redraiderengineer (talk) 23:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Starship Revert 1: the editor who made the reverted edit was clearly vandalizing the article, given that they also added "Going to Mars in may 2024 and going to the moon in may 2024 and there will be 200 people on mars in may 2024 and 160 people on the moon in may 2024 and moon base and mars base will happen in may 2024", with the edit descript being "ben".

Starship Revert 2: An editor removed IFT-3 entirely from the infobox, so I readded it.

Starship Revert 3: An IP made a good-faith edit matching RVac ISP in Starship article to that of Raptor, Since the source they used was almost a decade out of date, I did the opposite, and corrected the value in Raptor to the more recent once.

Starship Revert 4: the edit changing outcome to Partial Failure was mentioned here by Fehér Zsigmond-3, so I reverted it.

Starship Revert 5, IFT-3 Reverts 2 and 3, Super Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle Revert 8, : Look at the report directly above this one. The user who made the reverted edit is now indef-banned.

Super Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle Reverts 1-6: the issue was resolved shortly after, and a misconception I had on edit warring was corrected.

Super Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle Reverts 7: reverted to follow status quo, and reminded editor of that rule in edit descript.

The only connection between these reverts is readding sourced content, and reverting vandalism. The 3RR rule, as mentioned by RedRaider, was never violated, and for many of these reverts, there was already a discussion occurring at SpaceX Starship. Additionally, ignoring the edits by the now-banned disruptive editor, and the reverts prior to being corrected by ToBeFree, no second revert occured. Redacted II (talk) 00:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Tagging @Me Da Wikipedian, @IlkkaP, @Andyjsmith, and @Fehér Zsigmond-03 so that they can give their opinions on this. Redacted II (talk) 00:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Well in my opinion, Redacted II was definitely active, with many of his edits being reverts. And on the outside it does look like an edit war. However, as he said, many of his reverts were of misclassifying of Ift-3, so those are justified. And if people keep on doing something that has to be reverted, he did it. The accusation mainly come from (as far as I can see) from his Bold behaviour. If he saw something, he fixed it. What im trying to say is that he had the best of intentions, but overdid it. So if he tells people about whats happening and doesnt always act immediately, it would be fine.

Thank you for reading my argument defending Redacted II, and I hope this gets resolved soon. Fehér Zsigmond-03 (talk) 09:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

• Redacted II didn't revert the Mars/Moon vandalism. 103.211.18.23 made that revert. (I'm using their word, but editors should
  claims of vandalism
  are not substantiated.
• The rest of the explanations are
  preferred version. For example, at Starship HLS
  , Redacted II reverted an edit referring to IFT-3 as "the most successful [test flight] to date" with a March 2024 article from The Washington Post as the reference. Redacted II replaced that sentence in their revert with "successfully reaching orbit for the first time in March 2024." However, Redacted II's source is from January 2024 (before IFT-3 launched in March 2024) and doesn't support the claim.

21:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

• Redacted II reverted Natg 19 twice on the SpaceX Starship talk page. Including the reverts above, this is four reverts within a 24-hour period between SpaceX Starship and its talk page.

17:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

17:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

• ToBeFree warned Redacted II on 27 March, 2024, but twelve of the nineteen reverts mentioned in this discussion occurred after that warning.
• Redacted II involvement in this edit war was similar to the other editor that was indefinitely blocked (the other editor didn't appear to violate 3RR and this was their first warning), but unlike the other editor, Redacted II has been warned multiple times. Policies should apply
  equally
  .

Redraiderengineer (talk) 01:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

The four reverts of ObsessedWithStarship II were combined with reverts by 3 other editors. When that many editors are reverting something, and no-one else is bringing it back, it isn't a stretch to say that their editing is vandalism.

By your own admission, seven of the reverts occurred before the warning, so including them is rather unfair. And given that the reverts of ObsessedWithStarship II fall under Exception 4, I'll ignore those for now.

This leaves these reverts:

Starship 1: Revert of height. No second revert was conducted, so this is clearly not part of any edit war. Other part of reverted edit was reverted by another user.

Starship 2: Revert to status Quo. Second revert was two days later (Starship 4).

Starship 3: Revert of specific impulse, reasons explained in edit descript. No second revert needed, so again, clearly not part of an edit war.

Starship 4: Revert to Status Quo, as source added by IP did not support their statement. No violation of 3RR, no additional revert conducted until ObsessedWithStarship.

Super Heavy Lift1: Revert to Status Quo, explained status quo rule. No second revert (until almost exactly two weeks later, when ObsessedWithStarship removed that statement. No 3RR violation, and since there was a 14 day gap, its a stretch to say Edit Warring occurred.

Going back to ObsessedWithStarship II's edits, before I decided to also warn them for Edit Warring, I explained why their edits were reverted. So, saying I didn't try to discuss the matter is blatantly false.

Additionally, the editor clearly knew that the success of IFT-3 was being discussed. Looking at their FIRST edit: "The consensus is clear on this". Keep in mind that the RfC was (briefly closed) roughly an hour before. And they clearly knew about this, because their second edit was to revert the closure.

The reverts on the talk page were not mine alone. @Andyjsmith also reverted ObsessedWithStarship II, but by this point I had begun trying to discuss the closer with Natg 19, and later Nemov. Note: no 3RR violation, and attempt to discuss issue on a talk page. Redacted II (talk) 12:20, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the ping. I won't judge here; I semi-protected the page for a year now, though. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:12, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Satanic Verses (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Kecesi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [240]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 05:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC) Using loutsock
2. 06:11, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
3. 06:23, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
4. 07:26, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: 06:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC) Deleted by them.

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [241] On their talk page, as it concerns their violations of

.

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [242]

Comments:

• Blocked – for a period of 48 hours. Bbb23 (talk) 13:52, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Vivienne Martin (actress) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and Carl Weathers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Paper-Ringer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 17:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1220073979 by Jkaharper (talk) revert edit-warring - as mentioned, the probate page does not give us the specifics and the user-edited page which was created today is too recent for an obituary of a person who died over a year ago and whose death was also announced over a year ago! I don't see any consensus mentioned anywhere as yet."
2. 17:35, 21 April 2024 (UTC) "revert edit-warring - as mentioned, the probate page does not give us the specifics and the user-edited page which was created today is too recent for an obituary of a person who died over a year ago and whose death was also announced over a year ago! I don't see any consensus mentioned anywhere as yet."
3. 17:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC) "revert edit-warring - as mentioned, the probate page does not give us the specifics and the user-edited page which was created today is too recent for an obituary of a person who died over a year ago and whose death was also announced over a year ago! I don't see any consensus mentioned anywhere as yet."
4. 17:33, 21 April 2024 (UTC) "reverting - unsourced"
5. 17:32, 21 April 2024 (UTC) "reverting - unsourced"
6. 17:31, 21 April 2024 (UTC) "reverting - unsourced"
7. 17:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC) "reverting - unsourced"
8. 17:28, 21 April 2024 (UTC) "reverting - unsourced"
9. 17:27, 21 April 2024 (UTC) "reverting - unsourced"
10. 17:26, 21 April 2024 (UTC) "reverting - unsourced"
11. 17:25, 21 April 2024 (UTC) "reverting - unsourced"
12. 17:25, 21 April 2024 (UTC) "reverting - unsourced"
13. 17:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC) "reverting - unsourced"
14. 17:23, 21 April 2024 (UTC) "reverting - unsourced"
15. 17:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC) "reverting - unsourced"
16. 17:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC) "reverting - unsourced"
17. 16:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC) "revert edit-warring - as mentioned, the probate page does not give us the specifics and the user-edited page which was created today is too recent for an obituary of a person who died over a year ago and whose death was also announced over a year ago! I don't see any consensus mentioned anywhere as yet."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 17:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC) "ONLY Warning: Edit warring (
   UV 0.1.5
   )"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

• Blocked indefinitely ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Portal:Current events/2024 April 19 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Fuzheado (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: 15:30, 19 April 2024‎

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 17:40, 19 April 2024
2. 20:17, 19 April 2024
3. 18:04, 20 April 2024
4. 18:34, 20 April 2024

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: As an administrator who's blocked others for edit warring in the past, I'd think he wouldn't need one.

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Portal talk:Current events#Dispute over Taylor Swift album in Current events page

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [243]

Comments:
Reverts 3 and 4 are just outside the 24-hour window, so I'm bringing this here for a second opinion. Normally I'd protect, but that's not really an option for recent P:CE subpages. —

20:28, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

The question of whether to include the Taylor Swift material is also being discussed in a thread at Portal talk. EdJohnston (talk) 20:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Disappointed in this being reported when the editing cycle was stopped and a discussion was initiated at Portal_talk:Current_events#Dispute_over_Taylor_Swift_album_in_Current_events_page. My words:

"instead of undoing each other, can we please discuss this in a civil manner here."

The first editors that were removing content were either IP editors or had a very sparse/odd editing history, and were leaving non-useful two word edit summaries, including ones that gave no valid policy reasons: "not important" or "not notable." I treated them as drive-by vandalism. Only when editors such as Alsoriano97 were actually engaging in dialogue did I consider it start verging into "edit war" territory, which is why we stop editing and start a discussion. No 3RR action is warranted or needed. - Fuzheado | Talk 17:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Agree. The discussion was opened to talk about the inclusion or not of that content. It is disproportionate to open a report. _-_Alsor (talk) 17:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Sinhalese people (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Gabrielasirwatham (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [244]
2. [245]
3. [246]
4. [247]
5. [248]
6. [249]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [250]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [251]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [252]

Comments:

The editor has also been filed for a sock puppet report here:

[253]

However, the edit warring seems to be continuing unabated, hence why I have also reported the user here. The user did 4 reverts on the 17 April 2024, and potentially much more if the sock puppet report comes back positive. Metta79 (talk) 12:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

• Page protected – I've closed the sock case as  Unrelated but have put indefinite extended-confirmed protection on the article. (Neither account named in the sock case is extended-confirmed). Arbcom has just designated Sri Lanka as a contentious topic, though the templates for enacting those sanctions aren't set up yet. Let me know if this dispute spreads out to more articles. EdJohnston (talk) 03:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

• EdJohnston I've just indeffed Gabrielasirwatham for their response to my warning about casting aspersions on that talk page. I'm pretty sure we haven't lost a productive editor there. Black Kite (talk) 20:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Brendan O'Neill (columnist) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: LadybugStardust (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 01:23, 21 April 2024 (UTC) "Primary sources are acceptable when they are used to cite the author's POV."
2. 19:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC) "I will discuss this with you, but you had no right to remove the additional sources that I added to the other sections of the article."
3. 18:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC) "What is the "flattery"? Describing him as pro-choice? Also, why did you remove all of my sources as well?"
4. 18:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC) "I didn't use any "heavy-handed promotional language". There's nothing non-neutral about it."
5. 17:44, 20 April 2024 (UTC) ""
6. 20:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC) "Changing some wording to appease PC language police. As for The Oxford Student, in what possible way is it not a reliable source?"
7. 20:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1219788559 by Buidhe (talk) - No, The Oxford Student is widely accepted as a reliable source."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 18:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Brendan O'Neill (columnist)."
2. 19:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Brendan O'Neill (columnist)."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. 19:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Edit warring from LadybugStardust */ new section"

Comments:

Your complaint was regarding supposedly un-

WP:NPOV language in the section that I added about O'Neill's views on abortion. However, when you reverted that edit, you also removed all of the additional sources that I had added to other parts of the article - sources which you had no business removing, as they had nothing to do with your complaints over my supposedly "flattering" language in the abortion section. In my last edit, I restored those sources, but removed the section about abortion until we can work something out regarding the language that I used.--LadybugStardust (talk

) 19:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

As I explained on both your talk page, my talk page, and the article's talk page, the article's talk page is the place to discuss this. You do not have consensus for those changes and you should not be edit warring even if you think you are correct. Grayfell (talk) 19:21, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

And I am discussing it on the article's talk page right now. You still haven't given any reason why you removed my additional sources from the other parts of the article, though.--LadybugStardust (talk) 19:23, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Note that LadybugStardust is now up to 7 reverts (the most recent shortly outside the 24-hour window), this time restoring a self-published source about a third party (Greta Thunberg) that was criticized for his negative comments about her. Woodroar (talk) 01:54, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

• Page protected (already protected) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
• LadybugStardust, if this continues after the protection, I'd probably block. Page protection was a very generous, optimistic response. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Page: Pagoda (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 136.52.0.191 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 02:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC) ""
2. 02:07, 22 April 2024 (UTC) ""
3. 02:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC) ""
4. 01:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 02:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC) "Level 4 warning re.
   HG
   ) (3.4.12)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments: