RTI-274
Identifiers | |
---|---|
| |
Chemical and physical data | |
JSmol) | |
| |
(verify) |
RTI(-4229)-274, or 2β-((3,4-Methyl
Introduction
Very few esters of phenyltropanes are actually known to have been reported.
RTI decided that they wanted to make all 8 stereoisomers of the phenyltropane paroxetine homolog.[1]
MAT IC50 (nM) Nor/tropane-Paroxetine Hybrids | ||||
Compound | [3H]CFT | [3H]Paroxetine | [3H]Nisoxetine | |
Paroxetine | ? → 623 | ? → 0.28 | ? → 535 | |
R | "β,β" | 308 → 835 | 294 → 480 | 5,300 → 37,400 |
α,β | 172 → 142 | 52.9 → 90 | 26,600 → 2,500 | |
β,α | 3.01 → 3.86 | 422 → 5.62 | 123 → 14.4 | |
S | "β,β" | 1,050 → 1,210 | 88.1 → 424 | 27,600 → 17,300 |
α,β | 1,500 → 27.6 | 447→ 55.8 | 2,916 → 1,690 | |
β,α | 298 → 407 | 178 → 19 | 12,400 → 1,990 |
- N-demethylating the S-α,β (1S,2S,3R) isomer resulted in a 54-fold increase in DAT IC50.
In the case of nocaine it is understood that the SR enantiomer is the one that should be demethylated if it is wanted to improve DAT affinity.
That is the same enantiomer that is used in the production of paroxetine.
Skeletal rearrangement
Four years later some unrelated authors cited a skeletal rearrangement accounts for this.[2] Diagram[dead link]
Notice that they are not only interested in ethers, but nitrogen containing Nu's ("TRODAT")[3]
The metal is called "
The authors state that at first the acid is halogenated, the amide is prepared, and reduced.
Erratum
(a) (1) 1-chloroethyl chloroformate, 1,2-dichloroethane, reflux; (2) MeOH reflux; (b) p-toluenesulfonyl chloride, triethylamine; (c) LiAlH4, THF, rt; (d) trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride, pyridine, CH2Cl2; (e) Na, sesamol, THF; (f) 5% Na/Hg amalgam, Na2HPO4, MeOH.
MAT IC50 (Ki) N-Methyl → De-methyl | |||
Compound | [3H]CFT | [3H]Nisoxetine | [3H]paroxetine |
R-β,β | ? → 3 | ? → 2 (0.2) | ? → 6 (4) |
S-β,β | ? → ? | ? → ? (?) | ? → ? (?) |
R-"nonane" | 308 → 835 | 294 (27) → 480 (44) | 5,300 (3200) → 37,400 (22,500) |
S-"nonane" | 1050 → 1210 | 88 (8) → 424 (39) | 27,600 (16,600) → 17,300 (10,400) |
To solve the problem of the unexpected aza-bicyclo[3.2.2]nonane rearrangement product, the original synthesis had to be modified as follows;