Baylis–Hillman reaction

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
(Morita–)Baylis–Hillman reaction
Named after Ken-ichi Morita
Anthony B. Baylis
Melville E. D. Hillman
Reaction type Coupling reaction
Identifiers
Organic Chemistry Portal baylis-hillman-reaction
RSC ontology ID RXNO:0000076

In

allylic alcohol).[1][2]

Baylis-Hillman reaction
Baylis-Hillman reaction

The reaction is named for Anthony B. Baylis and Melville E. D. Hillman, two of the chemists who developed the reaction at Celanese; and K. Morita, who published earlier work[3] on the same.

The MBH reaction offers several advantages in organic synthesis:

  1. It combines easily prepared
    starting materials with high atom economy
    .
  2. It requires only mild conditions and does not require any transition metals.
  3. prochiral
    electrophiles.
  4. The product's dense functionalization enables many further transformations.

Its disadvantage is that the reaction is extremely slow.

Common reagents

The most frequently-used catalyst for the reaction is the tertiary amine

phosphines
.

Reaction mechanism

As of 2012, certain questions about MBH reaction's mechanism remain open.

Hill and Isaacs performed the first kinetic experiments in the 1990s, discovering that the

Deuterated acrylonitrile exhibited no kinetic isotope effect, but the product appeared to catalyze its own generation.[4]

In a model Hoffmann proposed seven years prior,

proton shift then generates the final MBH adduct, which eliminates
the catalyst.

If Hoffmann's model were correct, then the aldol addition would be the

aryl aldehydes with acrylates) the considerable generation of a dioxanone
byproduct.

In more recent work, McQuade et al and Aggarwal et al reevaluated the MBH mechanism, focusing on the proton-transfer and autocatalysis.

DMSO
, but ≥2 in all solvents), which would imply that proton abstraction is the rate-determining step.

To account for this reanalysis, McQuade proposed modifying Hoffman's proposal, such that after the first aldol addition, a second aldol adds to form a hemiacetal alkoxide. Then the rate-determining proton transfer releases the adduct A via a six-membered transition state, which further reacts to produce the MBH product B or a dioxanone byproduct C.

In a further modification, Aggarwal noted that observed that methanol inhibited autocatalysis in the MBH reaction. Thus he proposed that in the reaction's early stages, a mechanism equivalent to McQuade's proposal operates, but after 20% conversion, reaction with an alcoholic solvent can replace the second aldol addition. In support of this contention, Aggarwal and Harvey modeled the two pathways using density functional theory calculations and showed that the computed energy profile matches the experimental kinetic isotope effects and observed rate of reaction.[8] Also they showed that the overall enthalpic barrier of the alcohol-catalyzed pathway is slightly smaller than that of the non-alcohol-catalyzed pathway, rationalizing that as the alcohol (MBH product) concentration increases the alcohol-catalyzed pathway starts to dominate.

While McQuade's and Aggarwal's studies received much attention, unequivocal proof of intermediate A's role remained elusive as of 2012. Because A could be formed by separate addition of B to an aldehyde, any isolated A and C could be the result of side reactions, rather than the MBH itself. Nor has a convincing explanation yet been presented for Hill and Isaac's original first-order data.

Aggarwal's modification has its own controversies. If it is correct, then the rate-determining step changes from proton transfer to aldol addition over the course of the reaction

mass-spectroscopy data that is structural evidence for two different forms of the reaction's proton transfer step.[9]

Scope and limitations

The MBH reaction is extremely general. In most cases the electrophile is an aldehyde,

γ carbon rather than at the α.[13]

At the same time, it can be challenging to develop suitable reaction conditions. The reaction is slow (times of a

t-butyl acrylate and benzaldehyde with catalytic DABCO
in the absence of solvent required 4 weeks to give moderate conversion to the final product.

In aprotic solvents, the reaction rate is even slower, although recovery is possible with protic additives (e.g. alcohols and carboxylic acids).[15]

At such low rates, the activity of the substrates may induce competing side-reactions:

Michael addition to another molecule of the aryl vinyl ketone, which then adds to the aldehyde to form a double-MBH adduct.[16]

Due to the highly negative volume of activation, sluggish Baylis–Hillman reactions — including ketonic ones — can be realized by conducting the reaction under high pressure (up to 20 kbar).[14]

Variants

Sila-MBH reaction

In the sila-MBH reaction, α-silylated vinyl aryl ketones couple to aldehydes in the presence of catalytic

enone
and release the catalyst.

Rauhut-Currier reaction

The

Michael acceptor, not an aldehyde or an imine. Intermolecular Rauhut-Currier reactions typically exhibit poor chemoselectivity, because the reaction couples two activated alkenes, but intramolecular Rauhut-Currier reactions have been employed. For example, cyclization of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes can be performed in the presence of proline derivative and acetic acid, affording enantioenriched products.[18]

Tandem strategies

As mentioned above, the slow rate of the MBH reaction often enables side-reactions on its activated substrates. In

TiCl4, triphenylphosphine, and triethylamine:[19]

Likewise, activated acetylenes can undergo

phenolate nucleophile adds to a functionalized enyne before aza-MBH ring closure catalyzed by a chiral amine base.[20]

Asymmetric synthesis

Chiral auxiliaries

Oppolzer's sultam can be used as a chiral auxiliary for an asymmetric MBH reaction. When an acrylate substituted with the Oppolzer's sultam reacted with various aldehydes in the presence of DABCO catalyst, optically pure 1,3-dioxan-4-ones were afforded with cleavage of the auxiliary (67-98% yield, >99% ee). The cyclic products could be converted into desired MBH products by use of camphorsulfonic acid and methanol.[21]

A related hydrazide auxiliary is the chiral acryloylhydrazide, which reacts diastereoselectively with aldehydes.[22] Both diastereomers could be obtained with different choice of solvents (DMSO vs. mixed THF and H2O), suggesting that the transition structure conformation is solvent-influenced.

Chiral allenes and imines can also be employed for an asymmetric DABCO-catalyzed aza-MBH reaction.[23] Optically active 10-phenylsulfonylisobornyl buta-2,3-dienoate reacts with an aryl imine to afford α-allenylamine in a diastereoselective manner (37-57% yield).

Chiral Lewis-basic catalyst

Some enantioselective MBH reactions employ chiral tertiary amine catalysts. For example, β-ICD, a cinchona alkaloid derivative, is famous among the quinidine framework-based catalysts, and catalyzed an enantioselective MBH reaction with 1,1,1,3,3,3,-hexafluoroisopropyl acrylate as the activated alkene:[24]

The phenolic oxygen of β-ICD was shown to be important in the reaction, implying that β-ICD acts as a Bronsted acid, not just a nucleophile.

Cyclopentenone and various aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes undergo an asymmetric reaction using Fu's planar chiral DMAP catalyst in isopropanol (54-96% yield, 53-98% ee). In this case, magnesium iodide as a Lewis acid cocatalyst was required to accelerate the reaction.[25]

P-Chiral phosphines have been investigated.[26]

Simple diamines can also be employed as MBH catalysts. Methyl vinyl ketone and various substituted benzaldehydes were found to undergo asymmetric MBH reaction. The chiral pyrrolidine catalyst was effective for ortho- and para-substituted electron-deficient benzaldehydes (75-99% yield, 8-73% ee).[27]

Chiral phosphine MBH catalysts often contain Bronsted acid moieties in their backbones. For example, chiral phosphines containing a Lewis base, a Bronsted acid, and an acid-activated Bronsted base were developed for an asymmetric aza-MBH reaction (86-96% yield, 79-92% ee). The Bronsted acid and base moieties were proposed to be involved in the stabilization of zwitterionic species in a stereoselective manner.[28]

BINOL-derived chiral phosphine catalyst is also effective for an asymmetric aza-MBH reaction of N-tosyl imines with activated alkenes such as methyl vinyl ketone and phenyl acrylate.[29]

In addition, a distinct class of chiral phosphine-squaramide molecules could effectively catalyze an intramolecular asymmetric MBH reaction. ω-formylenones reacted to afford enantioenriched cyclic products at ambient temperature (64-98% yield, 88-93% ee).[30]

Chiral Lewis acid catalyst

Chiral Lewis acid catalysts have been given interests as they could activate the electron-withdrawing group in an enantioselective manner. Chiral cationic oxazaborolidinium catalysts were shown to be effective in the three-component coupling of α,β-acetylenic esters, aldehydes, and trimethylsilyl iodide (50-99% yield, 62-94% ee). Both enantiomeric products could be obtained by using different enantiomers of the catalyst.[31]

Complex of metal salt and chiral ligand is a viable strategy, too. La(OTf)3 and camphor-derived chiral ligands could induce enantioselectivity in a DABCO-catalyzed MBH reaction of various aldehydes and acrylates (25-97% yield, 6-95% ee). For these cases, multidentate ligands were usually employed to chelate with the metal, which activates both the zwitterionic enolate and the aldehyde.[32]

La(O-iPr)3 and BINOL-derived ligand system, in conjunction with catalytic DABCO, also works for an asymmetric aza-MBH reaction of various N-diphenylphosphinoyl imines and methyl acrylate. Aryl, heteroaryl, and alkenyl imines were all suitable for good yield and enantioselectivity.[33]

Chiral palladium(II) pincer complexes function as Lewis acid in the enantioselective DABCO-catalyzed aza-MBH reaction of acrylonitrile and various tosyl imines to afford functionalized α-methylene-β-aminonitriles (75-98% yield, 76-98% ee). Silver acetate is required to activate the palladium bromide precatalyst in the catalytic cycle.[34]

Chiral Bronsted acid cocatalyst

A variety of chiral thiourea catalysts are under investigation for asymmetric MBH reactions. Chiral thiourea and bis(thiourea) catalysts can be effective in DABCO-catalyzed MBH and aza-MBH reactions.[35][36] Jacobsen's thiourea catalyst performs an enantioselective aza-MBH reaction, for example (25-49% yield, 87-99% ee).

While simple thiourea requires a nucleophilic catalyst in conjunction, bifunctional catalysts such as phosphine-thioureas can be used alone for asymmetric MBH reactions. For example, various acrylates and aromatic aldehydes react in the presence of these catalysts to afford either enantiomeric MBH adducts (32-96% yield, 9-77% ee).[37]

MBH reaction can involve proline derivative as a cocatalyst. It was proposed that imidazole nucleophilic catalyst and proline effect the reaction via iminium intermediate.[38] With (S)-proline and DABCO, α-amido sulfones and α,β-unsaturated aldehydes undergo a highly enantioselective aza-MBH reaction (46-87% yield, E/Z 10:1-19:1, 82-99% ee).[39]

Applications in organic synthesis

The Baylis–Hillman adducts and their derivatives have been extensively utilized for the generation of heterocycles and other cyclic frameworks.[40]

MBH reactions are widely used in organic synthesis. For example, this reaction was used to construct key cyclic intermediates for syntheses of salinosporamide A, diversonol, and anatoxin-a.[41][42][43]

Further reading

Many reviews have been written, including:

References

  1. ^ Baylis, A. B.; Hillman, M. E. D. German Patent 2155113, 1972.
  2. doi:10.1002/0471264180.or051.02
  3. ^ K. Morita, Z. Suzuki and H. Hirose, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.,1968, 41, 2815.
  4. ^ a b J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1990, 3, 285.
  5. ^ Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1983, 22, 795.
  6. ^ Organic Letters, 2005, 7, 1, 147-150.
  7. ^ a b Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1706-1708.
  8. ^ J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15513.
  9. ^ J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74(8), 3031-3037
  10. ^ Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 85.
  11. ^ Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2418.
  12. ^ Chem. Commun. 2006, 2977.
  13. ^ J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 4196.
  14. ^ a b Basavaiah, Rao & Satyanarayana 2003.
  15. doi:10.1016/s0040-4020(01)88227-2
    .
  16. doi:10.1002/anie.201204891
  17. doi:10.1021/ol8026522
    .
  18. hdl:10261/113980
    .
  19. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(02)02263-3
    .
  20. doi:10.1002/chem.201001293
    .
  21. ^ J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 4317-4318
  22. ^ Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 6, 729-731
  23. ^ Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 3249-3256
  24. ^ J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10219-10220
  25. ^ Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 2644-2646
  26. PMID 25246969
    .
  27. ^ J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2010, 1511.
  28. ^ Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 331
  29. ^ Chem. Commun. 2003, 1310
  30. ^ Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 1012
  31. ^ Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 4398
  32. ^ J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 915-919
  33. ^ J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 11988
  34. ^ Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 10337-10341
  35. ^ Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347, 1701-1708
  36. ^ Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 6234
  37. ^ Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 8185
  38. ^ Chem. Eur, J. 2009, 15, 1734
  39. ^ J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 1096
  40. ^ Tetrahedron, 2008, 64(20), 4511-4574.
  41. ^ J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 6230-6231.
  42. ^ Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 307–309.
  43. ^ Chem. Commun. 2008, 3432.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baylis–Hillman_reaction&oldid=1207306389"